Master dairy judging’s make-or-break skill: Oral reasons decide 50% of scores. Transform technical precision into career-boosting communication.
The sun beats down on the fairgrounds as a young dairy judge steps into the reasons room, takes a confident stance, and begins to explain why she placed a class of Holstein four-year-olds the way she did. For the next two minutes, she delivers a clear, convincing argument that transforms what could be seen as subjective opinions into logical, evidence-based evaluations. Much like a seasoned herdsman explaining breeding decisions to a farm owner or a nutritionist justifying ration adjustments to a client, her comparative language is precise, her delivery poised, and her justifications compelling. In this moment, she’s not just competing—she’s developing skills that will serve her throughout her dairy career and beyond.
Yet we must ask ourselves: Are we truly maximizing the educational potential of oral reasons, or have we become so focused on the competitive formality that we’ve lost sight of their real-world application?
This scene plays out countless times at dairy judging contests across North America each year—from county fairs to the prestigious World Dairy Expo, from 4-H events to the National Intercollegiate Dairy Cattle Judging Contest. While casual spectators might focus solely on the placings, industry insiders know that oral reasons represent far more than a scoring component—they’re the breeding ground for the next generation of articulate, analytical, and confident dairy leaders.
Why Mastering Oral Reasons Is a Game-Changer for Your Dairy Career
Oral reasons are crucial for judges to explain and defend their decisions when placing a class of dairy cattle or heifers. In most contests, reasons account for 50% of a contestant’s overall score, equal in weight to the accuracy of the placings themselves. This equal emphasis reflects a fundamental truth about evaluation: knowing what you’re seeing is only half the battle; being able to articulate and defend your observations is equally valuable.
“Dairy judging teaches decision making better than anything else I know. Oral reasons are necessary for that decision-making process,” explains a veteran coach. “It’s a classic situation of identifying a problem, exploring alternatives, collecting information, and making a final decision.”
The skills developed through crafting and delivering compelling oral reasons extend well beyond the competition ring. Just as a skilled herd manager must communicate clearly with employees about cow management protocols or a dairy nutritionist must explain complex ration adjustments to producers, former judging team members consistently report that these abilities—making keen observations, organizing thoughts logically, speaking confidently under pressure, and persuasively defending decisions—have proven invaluable throughout their professional lives.
“Public speaking causes students to be concise and make a point,” notes Dr. Les Hansen. These skills translate directly to farm management, veterinary practice, sales, consulting, and virtually every other aspect of the dairy industry where clear communication is paramount.
The Elements of Excellence: What Separates Average Reasons from Outstanding Ones
Judges evaluating oral reasons typically focus on two primary components: content and delivery. While both matter, content carries greater weight—after all, even the most eloquent presentation can’t compensate for inaccurate observations or poor analysis, much like how a state-of-the-art milking parlor won’t overcome poor mastitis management practices.
Content That Convinces: The Foundation of Winning Reasons
Accuracy Above All
The cardinal rule of oral reasons is absolute honesty—what many coaches bluntly call the “don’t lie” principle. Every statement must be based on actual, careful observations of the animals. If you didn’t see it, don’t say it. Like DHI records that reflect actual production rather than wishful thinking, this integrity is non-negotiable, as an experienced judge can quickly detect fabricated or exaggerated differences.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: How many judges, particularly at youth levels, are fabricating differences they don’t actually observe because they feel pressured to fill their time allotment with “sufficient” detail?
Accuracy is the most essential thing in a reason set. Your credibility is shot when you mention traits that aren’t accurate for the animals.
Specific, Detailed, and Comparative
Vague generalizations like “better udder” or “nice dairy character” fail to demonstrate keen observation or understanding, similar to how a generic recommendation to “improve herd health” would be unhelpful to a dairy producer without specific protocols to implement. Elite judges use specific, comparative language that explains precisely how one animal differs from another.
Instead of saying “Cow 1 has a better udder than Cow 2,” compelling reasons might state: “1 shows a higher, wider rear udder attachment that’s more firmly attached, along with a stronger median suspensory ligament that creates more clearly defined halves, and a fore udder that blends more smoothly into the body wall compared to 2.”
This level of detail paints a vivid picture for the official, much like how a comprehensive genomic analysis provides specific trait data rather than just an overall ranking.
Prioritized by Importance
When comparing animals, leading with the most significant differences demonstrates sound judgment. While the PDCA Unified Scorecard assigns specific weightings to trait categories (Udder 40%, Dairy Strength 25%, Feet & Legs 20%, and Frame 15%), oral reasons should reflect the actual animals being evaluated—just as a herd manager must prioritize daily tasks based on immediate needs rather than following a rigid protocol.
“Within each pair, you must start with the most important and obvious difference between the two cows,” advises a successful coach. “If two cows have similar udders but one clearly excels in feet and legs, lead with that more apparent distinction rather than forcing an udder comparison.”
This isn’t to say scorecard priorities are ignored; instead, the initial attack on a pair focuses on the most glaring differences, while the overall emphasis given to traits like udder quality across the entire set of reasons should still reflect their fundamental importance.
We should ask this: Have we become so focused on the scorecard weightings that we’re creating artificial hierarchies for reasons that don’t reflect what we saw in the ring?
Organized for Clarity
Well-structured reasons follow a logical framework, similar to how a well-designed barn facilitates cow flow. The standard format includes an opening statement identifying the class and placing, systematic comparisons of each pair (1 over 2, 2 over 3, and 3 over 4), grants acknowledging where lower-placed animals excel, and a concise conclusion.
Within each pair comparison, address trait categories completely rather than bouncing between them. For instance, discuss all udder traits before moving to dairy strength or feet and legs. This organization makes it easier for the judge to follow your thought process. It evaluates your ability to organize information logically—a skill valued throughout the industry, whether developing breeding strategies or creating standard operating procedures for employees.
While this traditional structure provides an excellent foundation for learning, we must also ask if its rigid application always serves us best in developing the adaptable communication skills needed in today’s fast-paced dairy industry—a point we’ll explore further.
Breaking the Mold: When Traditional Approaches Fall Short
The tradition of highly structured, formal oral reasons has served the industry well for generations. But is this rigid format always the most effective way to develop real-world communication skills?
Professionals rarely have two minutes to deliver a perfectly structured comparison in the commercial dairy world. They need to make quick, incisive points that cut to the heart of the matter. A veterinarian explaining treatment options, a sire analyst justifying mating recommendations, or a nutritionist defending ration changes must be clear, persuasive, and efficient—often in less than 30 seconds.
Consider whether our emphasis on memorized structure sometimes produces contestants who can recite a perfect format but struggle to adapt their communication style to real-world scenarios. The most successful dairy professionals can adjust their approach based on the audience and situation, whether explaining complex concepts to fellow professionals or simplifying ideas for less technical listeners.
This doesn’t mean abandoning structure entirely. Instead, it suggests teaching students to understand the purpose behind the structure, so they can flexibly apply those principles in various professional contexts. Perhaps the next evolution in oral reasoning training should include practice scenarios that mimic real-world time constraints and audience needs.
Mastering the Language of Champions: Speaking in Dairy Terms
The dairy industry has developed a rich vocabulary for precisely describing cattle conformation. This specialized language allows judges to communicate subtle but significant differences that directly impact functional longevity and lifetime milk yield.
Comparative Language: The Heart of Effective Reasons
The fundamental rule of oral reasons is always comparing animals rather than merely describing them. This comparison provides necessary context and demonstrates evaluative judgment, much like how DHIR records are most valuable when viewed as comparisons within a herd rather than isolated numbers.
The simplest method for ensuring comparative language is using adjectives ending in “-er” (taller, wider, deeper, sharper, cleaner) or adding “more” when an “-er” form isn’t grammatically correct (more dairy, more capacious, more correct).
Avoid the general term “better,” which lacks specificity. Instead of saying “1 has a better udder than 2,” specify exactly how the udder is superior: “1 has a higher, wider rear udder attachment and a more strongly attached fore udder than 2.”
Essential Vocabulary for Each Scorecard Category
Udder Terminology (40% of scorecard) For discussing the most heavily weighted trait category, effective terms include:
- “Stronger fore udder attachment with less bulging at the quarter junctions”
- “Higher rear udder attachment with the secretory tissue starting well above the hock”
- “Deeper crease in her udder indicating a stronger median suspensory ligament”
- “Carries her udder higher above the hocks with more youthful suspension”
- “More symmetry and balance of quarters with teats more centrally placed beneath each quarter”
Dairy Strength Terminology (25%) When evaluating a cow’s capacity for milk production and feed efficiency:
- “More angularity with a longer, leaner neck transitioning smoothly into the shoulder”
- “Cleaner about the head, neck, and withers with more defined bone structure”
- “More open and well-sprung in her ribs with greater chest capacity”
- “More incurving thigh providing evidence of adipose mobilization for milk production”
- “Sharper over her topline while maintaining adequate width across the loin”
But let’s be honest: How often do we see significant differences in these traits that genuinely impact production, versus manufacturing differences to fit our predetermined placings?
Ringside to Reasons Room: The Critical Note-Taking Process
Effective note-taking forms the foundation of compelling oral reasons, serving as the critical bridge between evaluation in the ring and presentation in the reasons room. Without comprehensive, well-organized notes, even the most experienced judge will struggle to recall specific comparative details that substantiate their placings, just as a dairy producer without thorough herd records struggles to make informed management decisions.
Capturing What Matters Most
Strategic note-taking focuses on recording the key differences most significantly impacting placement decisions. Begin by noting any distinctive characteristics to help identify each animal (e.g., “the roan cow” or “tallest in class”).
Once a preliminary placing is determined, concentrate on documenting the major comparative differences between animals in each pair, prioritizing the most critical distinctions first. Be specific in recording details that support the main comparison points.
The hard truth many coaches won’t tell you: Great note-taking is often more valuable than a photographic memory. Even the most experienced judges can forget crucial details in the hour between viewing the class and delivering reasons. Your ability to capture the right observations in the moment often determines your success more than natural talent or speaking ability.
Delivering with Impact: The Performance Aspect of Oral Reasons
Even the most accurate and well-structured reasons can fall flat without effective delivery. The presentation style significantly influences how reasons are received and scored, much like how the same nutritional information can be received differently depending on whether a confident nutritionist or an uncertain feed representative delivers it.
Projecting Confidence Through Voice and Body Language
Non-verbal cues powerfully influence how oral reasons are perceived. Stand squarely on both feet, maintaining an upright posture approximately 5 to 8 feet from the judge. Many competitors choose to clasp their hands behind their backs to avoid distracting gestures.
Project a clear, distinct, and confident voice—strong enough to be easily heard without shouting. Maintain consistent eye contact with the judge throughout the presentation, as this conveys conviction and establishes a connection.
But we must confront an uncomfortable reality: We sometimes reward overly rehearsed, artificial delivery over genuine knowledge and passion. Are we teaching students to be theatrical performers rather than articulate professionals?
Training for Excellence: Practice Techniques That Create Champions
Mastering oral reasons requires dedicated practice using effective techniques that target both content development and delivery skills, not unlike how developing a high-producing herd requires both genetic selection and proper management.
Repeat Sets: The Power of Immediate Application
One particularly effective technique is “repeat sets,” where the speaker gives reasons for a class, receives specific feedback, and then immediately delivers the reasons again, incorporating the suggestions.
This iterative approach rapidly improves content and delivery, building confidence through tangible progress. The immediate application of feedback helps to reinforce correct techniques and correct errors before they become ingrained habits, similar to how immediate correction of milking technique prevents the development of bad habits that could lead to elevated somatic cell counts.
Recording for Self-Assessment
Video or audio recording practice sessions enable objective self-critique, allowing analysis of posture, eye contact, pacing, and terminology use. Many coaches recommend reviewing these recordings with specific focus areas in mind—first watching for content organization, then for delivery aspects like volume and enthusiasm, and finally for specific word choices and transitions.
This multi-layered review process helps isolate different components of the reasons for targeted improvement, much like how dairy farmers analyze milk components, reproductive performance, and health records separately to gain comprehensive insights into herd performance.
The practice technique most coaches overlook: Having students deliver reasons in real-world scenarios. Try having them explain a class to someone with no dairy background in just 30 seconds, or justify their decision to a skeptical farm owner who disagrees with their placing. These exercises develop adaptability that formal contest preparation often neglects.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Being aware of frequent mistakes helps judges at all levels refine their technique. Here are some of the most common errors and their solutions:
Using “Better” Without Specificity
Replace with specific comparative terms that detail exactly how one animal is superior (e.g., “1 is higher in the rear udder attachment” instead of “1 has a better rear udder”), just as specific breeding goals (“increasing component percentages”) are more actionable than general ones (“improving the herd”).
Describing Instead of Comparing
Always compare animals within a pair directly (e.g., “1 is taller than 2”) rather than describing one animal in isolation (e.g., “1 is a tall cow”), similar to how production records are most valuable when viewed comparatively within contemporary groups rather than as standalone numbers.
Disorganized Flow
Follow the standard structure (opening, pairs with grants, closing). Discuss one trait category completely before moving to another within a pair, just as milking protocols work best when followed in a consistent, logical sequence rather than haphazardly.
The most insidious pitfall of all: Going through the motions without genuine understanding. Too many contestants can recite perfect reasons without truly comprehending why the differences they’re describing matter functionally to a dairy cow‘s productivity and longevity. Are you explaining actual functional differences, or just regurgitating phrases you’ve been taught to use?
Beyond the Contest: How Oral Reasons Shape Industry Leaders
The process of mastering oral reasons develops a suite of transferable skills highly valued across academic, professional, and personal contexts. The structured decision-making required for placing a class and defending that placement cultivates critical thinking abilities applicable to countless real-world scenarios, from selecting replacement heifers to evaluating capital investments in farm infrastructure.
Creating the Complete Professional
The concise, persuasive communication demanded by the time-limited format builds public speaking confidence and articulation skills that serve individuals throughout their careers. As one industry professional notes, dairy judging teaches “talking and interacting with people, working with others, being part of a team, having a boss or coach, working toward a common goal and getting a job done”—all essential workplace competencies whether managing employees in a 5,000-cow operation or consulting with clients as a veterinarian.
Additionally, careful observation, methodical note-taking, and evidence-based reasoning form habits of mind that enhance problem-solving capabilities far beyond the judging arena. These skills prove invaluable when troubleshooting milk quality issues, reproductive performance challenges, or feed efficiency concerns on modern dairies.
A Call to Rethink Our Approach: Moving Forward
The time has come for a candid conversation about how we teach and evaluate oral reasons. While the traditional structure and approach have undeniable value, we must ensure we’re preparing students for the realities of modern dairy communication, not just competition success.
Ask yourself:
- Are your reasons genuinely reflecting what you observed, or are you forcing observations to fit expected patterns?
- Could you explain your dairy evaluation to someone outside the industry in a way they’d understand and find convincing?
- Are you developing transferable communication skills, or just contest techniques?
I challenge every coach, judge, and contestant to incorporate these practical exercises into their reasons practice:
- Deliver a 30-second “elevator pitch” version of your reasons to someone with no dairy background. For instance, can you convey the essence of why your top cow won, focusing on just one or two key functional advantages, in the time it takes for an elevator ride? This hones your ability to be concise and impactful.
- Explain your placing to a skeptical producer who disagrees with your assessment
- Justify your evaluation without using any industry jargon whatsoever
- Record yourself giving reasons, then critically analyze whether you sound authentic or rehearsed
The dairy industry needs professionals who can communicate effectively in diverse contexts—not just those who excel in the artificial environment of a reasons room. By expanding our practice approaches and evaluation criteria, we can better prepare the next generation for real-world success while maintaining the valuable tradition of formal reasons.
The next time you step into a reasons room or coach a young judge, remember that the ultimate goal isn’t perfecting a two-minute memorized speech—it’s developing the ability to make sound decisions and communicate them persuasively in any setting. That’s the true legacy and value of the oral reasons tradition, and it’s up to all of us to ensure it remains relevant and effective for generations to come.
How will you transform your approach to oral reasons to better prepare yourself or your students for real-world dairy industry communication? The answer to that question may determine not just competitive success, but professional impact for years to come.
Key Takeaways:
- 50% of judging scores hinge on oral reasons—prioritize accuracy, structure, and PDCA trait priorities (udder, dairy strength, feet/legs).
- Comparative language > description: Use “-er” terms (e.g., “higher rear udder”) and grants to acknowledge lower-ranked strengths.
- Notes are non-negotiable: Develop shorthand for real-time comparisons; organize by pair differences, not scorecard order.
- Rethink tradition: Balance contest prep with adaptable communication drills (e.g., 30-second farm owner pitches).
- Life skills payoff: Builds decision-making, public speaking, and persuasive clarity for leadership roles beyond the show ring.
Executive Summary:
Oral reasons—the ability to justify dairy cattle placings—are equally weighted with actual rankings in competitions, demanding technical accuracy, structured arguments, and persuasive delivery. Judges evaluate content (specific comparisons, PDCA scorecard alignment) and presentation (clarity, confidence), with note-taking and industry-specific terminology as foundational skills. The article challenges rigid traditional formats, urging adaptation for real-world scenarios like client consultations or herd management. By mastering comparative analysis and dynamic communication, competitors gain transferable skills in critical thinking and leadership, positioning oral reasons as both a competitive edge and career accelerator.
Learn more:
- From Snapshot to Champion: Understanding the Challenging Perspective of Dairy Cattle Judges
- Michigan Team Wins National 4-H Dairy Judging Contest
- University of Minnesota Dominates in Accelerated Genetics Dairy Cattle Judging Contest
Join the Revolution!
Join the Revolution!Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
