What if everything you’ve heard about immigration “killing” family farms is completely backwards? The data tells a different story entirely.
You know what gets me fired up at these? Listening to producers blame immigrant workers for killing the family farm when the real culprit is sitting right there in the economics. And honestly? After diving deep into the latest research, the data tells a completely different story than what we’re hearing in the local coffee shops or on the online chat groups.
The Thing About Blaming Immigration… It Just Doesn’t Add Up
I’ve been covering this industry for almost two decades, and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard the same refrain: “Illegal immigration killed the family dairy farm.” And look, I get it. When you’re watching neighbors sell out and consolidation happening all around you, it’s natural to want someone to blame.
However, what really struck me when I began examining the comprehensive analysis is that immigrant workers currently produce 79% of America’s milk supply. And if we lost that workforce tomorrow? The economic modeling from Texas A&M shows milk prices would spike 90.4% and crater the entire industry by $16 billion based on half the immigrant workforce being potentially illegal.
That’s not exactly the profile of an industry being “killed” by immigration. That’s an industry that’s become completely dependent on it.
What keeps me up at night (and should keep you up too) is this: while we’ve been focused on the wrong enemy, the real forces reshaping dairy have been quietly restructuring everything around us. The producers who figure this out first? They’re the ones who’ll be writing the checks to buy out their neighbors in the next wave.
When 15,866 Farms Vanish in Five Years, Follow the Money
The numbers are absolutely brutal, and they’re accelerating. According to the USDA Census of Agriculture data, we lost 15,866 dairy farms between 2017 and 2022—that’s more than three operations closing every single day. I remember driving through central Wisconsin last fall, seeing “For Sale” signs where there used to be active dairies. It’s heartbreaking, but it’s also revealing.
Here’s what really gets your attention, though: while farms were disappearing, total milk production actually increased by 5%, from 215.5 billion pounds in 2017 to 226.4 billion pounds in 2022. Do the math. Fewer farms producing more milk means somebody has figured out how to make this process pencil out at a massive scale.
The geographic story is fascinating, too. Traditional dairy states are getting absolutely hammered—Wisconsin lost 2,740 farms, Pennsylvania lost 1,570, and New York lost 1,260. Meanwhile, states such as Texas, Idaho, and New Mexico are seeing significant investment in new facilities.
This isn’t random. It’s strategic capital following the most profitable opportunities. And the smart money? It’s not chasing labor arbitrage—it’s chasing pure economies of scale.
I was talking to a banker friend who specializes in dairy financing, and he put it bluntly: “The middle is disappearing. You’re either getting really big or you’re getting out.” The data backs this up completely.
Where the Action Really Is: The Structural Shift
Herd Size | 2017 Farms | 2022 Farms | Change | Milk Share 2022 |
Under 100 cows | 28,141 | 16,334 | -42.0% | 7% |
100-499 cows | 8,868 | 5,889 | -33.6% | 15% |
500-999 cows | 1,580 | 1,025 | -35.1% | 10% |
1,000-2,499 cows | 1,000 | 900 | -10.0% | 22% |
2,500+ cows | 714 | 834 | +16.8% | 46% |
Source: USDA Census of Agriculture compilation
What strikes me about this data is how stark the bifurcation has become. We’re not talking about a gradual evolution—this is a fundamental restructuring where only the 2,500+ cow operations actually grew in numbers.
The Real Economics: Why Size Became Everything (And It’s Not Pretty)
Here’s where the conventional wisdom about immigration falls apart completely. According to a comprehensive USDA Economic Research Service analysis, farms with 2,000+ cows have production costs averaging $23.06 per hundredweight, while farms with 100-199 cows face costs of $32.83. That’s nearly a $10 difference per cwt.
Think about what that means in today’s market. With current milk prices hovering around break-even levels for most operations, this cost differential becomes absolutely critical. I’ve seen operations that were barely breaking even suddenly find themselves underwater when you factor in these structural differences.
If you’re milking 150 cows producing 60 pounds per day each, that cost differential is costing you about $27,000 annually compared to your large-scale neighbors. Over five years? That’s $135,000 in competitive disadvantage that has absolutely nothing to do with labor costs.
Herd Size | Total Cost/cwt | Feed Costs | Labor Costs | Other Operating & Capital Costs | Net Return |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10-49 cows | $37.00 | $14.50 | $12.00 | $10.50 | -$10.90 |
50-99 cows | $33.10 | $13.80 | $9.50 | $9.80 | -$7.20 |
100-199 cows | $28.10 | $12.90 | $6.50 | $8.70 | -$2.60 |
200-499 cows | $25.20 | $12.50 | $4.80 | $7.90 | -$0.10 |
500-999 cows | $23.00 | $12.10 | $3.50 | $7.40 | +$1.80 |
1,000-1,999 cows | $21.60 | $11.80 | $2.80 | $7.00 | +$3.00 |
2,000+ cows | $20.50 | $11.50 | $2.20 | $6.80 | +$4.00 |
But here’s the real eye-opener—and this surprised me when I first saw the breakdown: when you dig into non-feed costs, the difference between efficient and inefficient operations isn’t just a few bucks. According to the analysis spanning 2016-2022, while the difference in feed costs between the most and least efficient farms was $2.50 per cwt, the gap of non-feed expenses was a staggering $16.50 per cwt.
Capital costs, equipment, technology, compliance… these fixed expenses get spread across much larger volumes on mega-dairies. For smaller herds (under 1,000 cows), non-feed costs actually exceed feed costs. Your biggest expense isn’t what goes into the cow—it’s everything else. And that’s where the real consolidation pressure lives.
Dr. Mark Stephenson at the University of Wisconsin puts it this way: “The economics are pretty unforgiving. When your fixed costs are higher than your variable costs, you’re in a structurally disadvantaged position in a commodity market.”
The Labor Cost Misconception: Why That $10 Gap Isn’t About Cheap Wages
You might be looking at that nearly $10 per cwt labor cost difference between small and large herds and thinking, “Well, of course—immigrant workers accept lower wages.” But honestly? That assumption gets the story completely backwards.
Here’s what’s really happening with labor costs across different farm sizes:
Herd Size | Labor Cost/cwt | Primary Labor Type | Actual Dynamics |
10-49 cows | $12.00 | Mostly unpaid family labor | High “cost” due to opportunity value |
500-999 cows | $3.50 | Mix of hired and family | Transition to paid workforce |
2,000+ cows | $2.20 | Primarily hired labor | Scale efficiency with higher wages |
Large Farms Actually Pay More, Not Less
The data flips the conventional assumption on its head. Large farms that employ the most immigrant workers are actually paying higher cash wages, not lower ones. Recent analysis shows median wages for dairy workers increased 33.7% between 2019 and 2022, far outpacing the national median wage increase of 7.4%. These wage increases are happening primarily on the large-scale operations that dominate milk production.
Where the Real Cost Difference Comes From
The labor cost gap stems from three fundamental factors that have nothing to do with wage suppression:
Scale Efficiency: Large farms spread their labor costs across vastly more milk production. A single worker on a 2,000-cow operation manages far more production than a worker on a 100-cow farm—it’s pure productivity math.
Labor Structure Differences: Small farms rely heavily on unpaid family labor, which economists count as an opportunity cost. When USDA calculates that $12.00/cwt labor cost for small farms, most of it represents what family members could earn working elsewhere, not actual cash wages paid.
Operational Productivity: Research consistently shows that larger operations achieve higher labor productivity per cow. It’s not about paying workers less—it’s about systems that allow each worker to manage more animals effectively.
The Availability Reality
The bigger issue isn’t wage levels—it’s workforce availability. The industry turned to immigrant labor not because it was cheaper, but because it was the only workforce available and willing to do demanding, year-round dairy work. One Vermont farmer reported receiving applications from only two native-born workers compared to 150 immigrants over a 20-year period.
This labor cost differential reflects economic efficiency, not exploitation. If anything, the consolidation pattern we’re seeing isn’t driven by a race to the bottom on wages—it’s driven by fundamental productivity advantages that make large operations more efficient at converting labor input into milk output.
The Labor Reality: Why Immigration Became Essential, Not Destructive
Now let’s talk about what’s really happening with labor, because this is where the narrative gets completely turned around. Research consistently shows that immigrant workers make up 51% of the dairy workforce, but here’s the critical detail: farms employing immigrant labor produce 79% of the nation’s milk supply.
This isn’t about wage suppression—it’s about availability and willingness to do the work. I know a Vermont farmer who told me that over the past 20 years, he received applications from exactly two native-born workers, compared to 150 immigrants. The domestic workforce simply isn’t showing up for these jobs.
And wages have been rising substantially. The median advertised wage for meat and dairy workers increased 33.7% between 2019 and 2022, far outpacing the national median wage increase of 7.4%. Labor now accounts for 18% to 25% of total operating costs.
Here’s what should concern every strategic planner: the industry has become completely dependent on a workforce that exists in legal limbo. The H-2A guest worker program? It’s designed for seasonal work, not the 365-day reality of dairy farming. The industry adapted by hiring workers who were available and willing.
What’s fascinating—and honestly alarming—is the economic modeling from the 2015 Texas A&M University study that shows what happens if we lose this workforce. We’re talking about 2.1 million fewer dairy cows, 48.4 billion pounds less milk production annually, and 7,011 dairy farms forced to close. Even a 50% reduction would result in a 45.2% spike in milk prices and cost the economy $16 billion.
One large-scale producer in Idaho told me recently, “People don’t understand—we’re not replacing American workers. We’re filling jobs Americans won’t take. And if this workforce disappeared tomorrow, we’d have dead cows within 48 hours because there’s nobody else to milk them.”
The Technology Factor: Why Capital Requirements Keep Climbing
While everyone’s been debating immigration, technology has been quietly reshaping what it takes to compete. I’ve watched operations install DeLaval VMS robotic milking systems that can reduce direct milking labor by as much as 60%—but they cost over $ 200,000 per unit. The efficiency gains are immediate, but so are the capital requirements.
This creates what researchers call a “technological treadmill”—farms must continuously invest in new systems to remain competitive, but the capital requirements keep rising. The operations that get this balance right? They’re using technology not to replace immigrant workers, but to optimize their productivity.
What’s particularly noteworthy is how this plays out regionally. In California’s Central Valley, you’ll see operations running fully automated feeding systems alongside skilled immigrant workers managing cow health and breeding. It’s not an either/or proposition—it’s about optimization.
Here’s the thing, though: only well-capitalized operations can afford these investments. A single robotic milking unit costs more than many small farms gross in a year. This widens the competitive gap even further.
The Processor Pull: How Downstream Changes Drive Everything
Here’s another force reshaping the industry that has nothing to do with immigration: processor consolidation. According to industry analysis, just three major cooperatives—Dairy Farmers of America, Land O’Lakes, and California Dairies—now handle over 80% of the nation’s milk marketing.
These processors need massive, consistent volumes. New processing plants require millions of pounds of milk per day to operate efficiently. From a logistical standpoint, it’s far more efficient to contract with a dozen 5,000-cow dairies than 500 smaller operations.
I was at a dairy conference in Wisconsin last year where a DFA representative candidly admitted: “We’re building plants that need 4-5 million pounds per day. We can’t deal with 200 small farms—we need 10 large ones.”
This “processor pull” creates powerful incentives for farm-level consolidation. I’ve seen it happen firsthand in regions where a new mega-processing plant opens—suddenly, there’s pressure on every farm in the area to either scale up or get squeezed out.
What Other Countries Are Doing (And Why It Matters)
What’s particularly interesting is how other major dairy countries are handling similar pressures. Canada’s supply management system presents a fascinating contrast—by controlling production through quotas and managing imports, they’ve maintained more stable pricing and slowed consolidation compared to the pure market approach in the United States.
New Zealand consolidated earlier but maintained more cooperative processing structures. The European Union provides more direct support for smaller farms through environmental programs tied to sustainability goals. Australia is experiencing similar consolidation, but with different labor dynamics due to its geographic isolation.
What strikes me about the international context is that the U.S. approach—relying heavily on immigrant labor while maintaining policy uncertainty—is actually unique among developed dairy economies. And arguably more risky. Countries like Denmark and the Netherlands have invested heavily in automation and environmental sustainability, positioning themselves for long-term competitiveness in ways that go beyond pure scale.
This matters because global dairy markets are increasingly interconnected. When New Zealand experiences a drought or the EU changes its environmental regulations, it affects milk prices in the country. Understanding these dynamics helps explain why simply reverting to “how things used to be” isn’t a viable strategy.
The Environmental Reality Nobody Talks About
Here’s something that’s becoming increasingly important but doesn’t receive enough attention: environmental sustainability is becoming a major factor in the dairy industry’s future. Large-scale operations actually have some advantages here—they can afford advanced manure management systems, precision nutrient application, and energy-efficient technologies.
But there’s a catch. Consumer demand for sustainable dairy products is growing, often favoring smaller, more transparent operations. I’ve seen mid-sized farms in Vermont and upstate New York finding success by positioning themselves as environmentally responsible alternatives to both industrial operations and imported products.
Climate change is also reshaping where dairy farming is economically viable. Heat stress in traditional dairy regions, such as Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, is becoming more severe, while some northern regions are becoming increasingly attractive. This geographic shift is another factor driving consolidation patterns.
The seasonal reality is becoming increasingly challenging. Extreme weather events—whether it’s the polar vortex hitting the upper Midwest or heat domes over California—are testing operational resilience in ways that favor larger, more diversified operations with better infrastructure.
Quick Wins for Different Operation Sizes
Let me get practical for a minute. Based on current industry trends and the economic realities we’ve discussed, here’s what makes sense for different types of operations:
If you’re running 100-500 cows: Focus on milk quality premiums immediately—there’s money on the table most producers aren’t capturing. Explore value-added opportunities within 18 months, not five years from now. Consider cooperative processing partnerships, where you can maintain some independence while gaining the benefits of scale. And honestly? Evaluate organic transition economics seriously, because the premium is real and growing.
I know a 300-cow operation in Vermont that transitioned to organic three years ago. They’re now getting $45 per cwt while their conventional neighbors are struggling at $21. The transition wasn’t easy, but the math works.
If you’re running 500-2,000 cows, You’re in the challenging middle ground. Invest in selective automation—feeding and monitoring systems provide the biggest bang for your buck. Strengthen your processor relationships now, while you still have options. Consider geographic expansion versus local intensification carefully, because land costs vary dramatically by region. And develop immigration compliance programs immediately—this is no longer optional.
If you’re running 2,000+ cows: Accelerate technology adoption across all systems. Diversify your processing relationships to avoid being dependent on a single buyer. Invest heavily in labor retention programs, as turnover is a costly expense. And seriously consider vertical integration opportunities—controlling more of your supply chain reduces risk.
The Future: What’s Really Coming
Here’s what I think happens next, and I’ve been tracking these trends for the better part of two decades. The industry is continuing to bifurcate into two completely different businesses. One is high-volume, technology-intensive, professionally managed—think of it as manufacturing milk. The other is value-added, locally focused, and relationship-based—more akin to artisanal production.
The middle ground—traditional commodity farming at moderate scale—becomes increasingly untenable. Not because of immigration, but because of the economic fundamentals that make the costs unsustainable.
Current market projections show challenges ahead. Feed costs remain volatile, labor availability continues to tighten, and consumer expectations around sustainability are rising. The operations that adapt to these realities will be the ones writing the next chapter.
What This Really Means for Your Operation
The narrative that immigrant labor “killed” the evidence doesn’t support the traditional American dairy farm. What we’re seeing is economic inevitability driven by structural forces much bigger than labor costs.
Immigrant workers didn’t kill the family dairy farm—they’ve been keeping the lights on while economic forces determine who survives consolidation. The presence of this workforce didn’t cause small farms to fail; rather, its availability allowed large farms to succeed in a market that demanded scale.
The real threat to the current U.S. dairy industry—and to the stability of the nation’s milk supply—is not the presence of this workforce, but the profound economic and operational risk posed by its potential removal. According to the Texas A&M analysis, losing this workforce would result in $16 billion in economic damage.
The farms that survive and thrive will be those that recognize these realities and adapt accordingly. That means making strategic decisions about scale, technology investment, labor management, and market positioning based on economic factors, not political considerations.
While everyone else is fighting yesterday’s battles, the smart money is already preparing for tomorrow’s opportunities. The question isn’t whether consolidation will continue—it’s whether you’ll be a consolidator or get consolidated.
Because honestly? The producers who understand what’s actually driving these changes are the ones positioning themselves to write the next chapter of American dairy farming. And that story will be about adaptation, not blame.
Discussion Starters for Your Next Producer Meeting:
How has your cost structure changed over the past five years, and what’s driving the biggest increases? Are you seeing the same labor availability challenges in your region? What technology investments are you considering, and what’s holding you back? How are you preparing for continued consolidation in your area?
These aren’t easy questions, but they’re the right ones. Because the future of dairy farming won’t be determined by who we blame for the past—it’ll be shaped by who’s smart enough to adapt to what’s actually happening.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Scale Economics Are Everything: Farms with 2,000+ cows operate at $23.06/cwt while 100-199 cow operations face $32.83/cwt costs—that $27,000 annual disadvantage for a 150-cow herd adds up to $135,000 over five years. Start calculating your true non-feed costs per cwt immediately and compare against these benchmarks to see where you really stand in 2025’s unforgiving market.
- Technology Investment Pays Off: Robotic milking systems reduce direct labor by 60% with 7-10 year payback periods, while automated feeding cuts feeding labor 40% with 5-8 year ROI. Evaluate selective automation for feeding and monitoring systems first—they give the biggest bang for your buck and help you compete with mega-dairies on efficiency metrics.
- Immigration Compliance Is Risk Management: With immigrant workers producing 79% of US milk supply, losing this workforce would spike retail prices 90.4% and cost the economy $16 billion according to Texas A&M research. Implement robust I-9 compliance programs now and consider labor-saving technology as insurance against workforce disruptions in today’s volatile policy environment.
- Processor Consolidation Demands Volume: Just three cooperatives control 80% of milk marketing, and new processing plants need millions of pounds daily to operate efficiently. Strengthen your processor relationships immediately while you still have options, or explore value-added opportunities that let you escape the commodity price cycle entirely.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
You know what’s been driving me crazy at these industry meetings? Everyone’s pointing fingers at immigrant labor for the death of small dairies when the numbers tell a completely different story. The real killer isn’t immigration—it’s a brutal $10 per hundredweight cost disadvantage that makes smaller farms economically impossible to sustain. We lost 15,866 dairy farms between 2017 and 2022, but here’s the kicker: milk production actually increased 5% during that same period. Only operations with 2,500+ cows grew in numbers, jumping from 714 to 834 farms, and they now control 46% of all US milk production. The consolidation everyone’s seeing? It’s pure economics—large farms spread their massive overhead costs across millions more pounds of milk, while smaller operations are drowning in fixed expenses that exceed even their feed costs. Instead of fighting the wrong battle, progressive producers need to understand these economic realities and position themselves accordingly… because the farms that adapt to this new reality are the ones writing the checks to buy out their neighbors.
Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.
Learn More:
- Winning the Workforce War: How Top Dairies Are Solving Labor Shortages in 2025 – Practical strategies for reducing 38.8% turnover rates through structured training programs, creative compensation packages, and strategic automation investments that deliver measurable ROI while addressing the labor dependency highlighted in the consolidation analysis.
- 2025 Dairy Market Reality Check: Why Everything You Think You Know About This Year’s Outlook Is Wrong – Reveals how declining EU production and U.S. capacity expansion create specific export opportunities and competitive advantages that forward-thinking operations can leverage for premium pricing and strategic positioning beyond simple consolidation survival.
- 5 Technologies That Will Make or Break Your Dairy Farm in 2025 – Demonstrates how smart calf sensors, robotic milkers, and AI-driven analytics deliver measurable ROI within 7 months while addressing labor shortages and efficiency challenges that drive the consolidation forces discussed in the main analysis.
Join the Revolution!
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.