Archive for raw milk risks

Bird Flu and Milk: The Unshakeable Science Protecting Your Bulk Tank

Bird flu in milk? Science confirms pasteurization kills H5N1—but raw dairy risks remain what every producer MUST know now.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The H5N1 avian flu outbreak in U.S. dairy herds has raised urgent questions about milk safety. New FDA/USDA research confirms pasteurization eliminates the virus while raw milk products pose risks. Cornell University studies reveal H5N1 survives in aged raw milk cheese, challenging traditional safety assumptions. Federal testing programs and biosecurity protocols—including milk segregation, PPE use, and heat-treated calf feed—enable safe operations. Producers in affected states must prioritize bulk tank testing and adhere to updated guidelines to protect herds and maintain consumer confidence in dairy products.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Pasteurization neutralizes H5N1—HTST methods to eliminate 99.99% of virus particles, ensuring commercial milk safety.
  • Raw milk risks confirmed—H5N1 survives 60-day cheese aging, debunking “natural immunity” claims.
  • Biosecurity essentials—Milk diversion, PPE, and water management prevent herd transmission.
  • Test proactively—Weekly bulk tank monitoring detects outbreaks early in high-risk regions.
  • Global lessons—U.S. protocols exceed EU raw milk standards during zoonotic crises.
H5N1 bird flu, pasteurized milk safety, raw milk risks, dairy herd biosecurity, National Milk Testing Strategy

As H5N1 continues its unprecedented spread through America’s dairy herds, definitive research confirms what separates safe milk from potential biohazards. With the USDA’s National Milk Testing Strategy fully operational and FDA studies conclusively validating pasteurization’s effectiveness, dairy farmers have clear guidance amidst this ongoing crisis. Here’s what every producer needs to know about the virus that’s reshaping milk handling protocols nationwide.

The Current State of the Outbreak

Since being first detected in Texas dairy cattle in March 2024, Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 has spread to at least 12 U.S. dairy sectors. What initially presented as a “mystery illness” affecting primarily older dairy cows in Texas, Kansas, and New Mexico has been confirmed across multiple regions.

The disease has triggered a comprehensive federal response, with both FDA and USDA implementing monitoring and control strategies to contain the spread while ensuring milk safety.

Key Outbreak Timeline:

  • March 2024: First detection of H5N1 in dairy cattle in Texas and Kansas
  • April 2024: Spread confirmed to multiple states, including New Mexico, Idaho, and Michigan
  • July 2024: Peer-reviewed studies confirm pasteurization effectiveness against H5N1
  • March 2025: Cornell University research reveals H5N1 survives in aged raw milk cheese

Milestone Research Confirms: Pasteurization Neutralizes H5N1

The FDA and USDA have conclusively demonstrated that standard pasteurization processes eliminate the H5N1 virus from milk, even when starting with extremely high viral loads. A first-of-its-kind study using commercial milk processing equipment confirmed that High-Temperature Short-Time (HTST) pasteurization—heating milk to 161°F (72°C) for 15 seconds—effectively inactivates the HPAI H5N1 virus in milk.

Dr. Nathan Anderson, Director of FDA’s Division of Food Processing Science and Technology, explained: “While testing finished product post-pasteurization is one strategy to detect potential problems in finished products, validating the effectiveness of the pasteurization parameters critically demonstrates that commercial milk processing is capable of controlling the HPAI virus.”

This groundbreaking research established that HTST pasteurization eliminates at least 12 log10 EID50 per milliliter—approximately one trillion virus particles per milliliter—providing an enormous margin of safety. A peer-reviewed study published in January 2025 confirmed that complete viral inactivation occurs at standard pasteurization temperatures.

Comprehensive Testing Validates Safety:

The FDA’s extensive retail sampling program tested 297 pasteurized dairy products, including milk, cheese, butter, and ice cream, finding no viable H5N1 virus in any samples. This comprehensive sampling included products from regions with active H5N1 outbreaks in dairy cattle, providing real-world confirmation of pasteurization effectiveness.

In August 2024, FDA testing found all 167 store-shelf dairy product samples negative for viable H5N1 virus, though 17% contained inactive viral fragments—confirming pasteurization killed the virus.

Raw Milk Risk Reality: Cornell Research Bombshell

While pasteurized milk has been repeatedly confirmed safe, research from Cornell University reveals concerning findings about raw milk products. Studies investigated whether the traditional 60-day aging process for raw milk cheese—considered a safety measure—would eliminate the H5N1 virus.

The results were definitive: H5N1 survived in non-heat-treated raw milk cheese through and beyond the 60-day aging process. This finding challenges the long-held belief that aging alone provides adequate protection against pathogens in raw milk cheese.

Raw Milk Advocacy vs. Scientific Evidence

Some raw milk advocates have challenged federal warnings as “fearmongering,” arguing that traditional processes and natural protective factors in raw milk are sufficient. However, the comprehensive research from Cornell University directly rebuts these claims by demonstrating H5N1 survival in raw milk products despite traditional aging processes.

The FDA maintains its longstanding position that “unpasteurized, raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks to consumers,” now with specific evidence regarding H5N1.

Notably, alternative processes that can inactivate H5N1 in raw milk have been identified through research:

  • Heating raw milk to 130°F (54°C) for at least 15 minutes
  • Heating raw milk to 140°F (60°C) for at least 10 seconds
  • Adjusting pH to 5.0 (highly acidic), which leads to rapid inactivation of H5N1

Human Health Impacts and Transmission Risk

While human cases of H5N1 related to dairy exposure remain rare, they have been confirmed. Texas health officials confirmed a human case in a person who had direct exposure to dairy cattle presumed to be infected with H5N1, with eye inflammation as the only symptom.

Public health officials emphasize that “people with close contact with affected animals suspected of having avian influenza A(H5N1) have a higher risk of infection”. The virus concentrates in the udder of infected cows and can be present in milk at high levels, creating risk for those handling raw milk from infected animals.

Calf Feeding Safety Guidelines:

For calf-feeding operations, experts recommend heat-treating milk from potentially infected herds before feeding it to calves. Standard pasteurization protocols (145°F for 30 minutes or 161°F for 15 seconds) effectively eliminate the virus in regular calf milk.

Colostrum requires different approaches, as standard pasteurization would coagulate the proteins. Heat treatment at 140°F (60°C) for 60 minutes is recommended while maintaining agitation to prevent protein damage.

The National Milk Testing Strategy: Key Farmer Protocols

The USDA’s National Milk Testing Strategy established a systematic approach to detecting and responding to H5N1 in dairy herds. The program includes:

  1. Collection of raw milk samples at dairy processing plants before pasteurization
  2. Double-masked testing through a third-party central location to protect farmer identities
  3. Structured sampling over six weeks, designed to minimize extra labor by integrating with routine regulatory sampling

Vermont has implemented an exemplary program in which 90% of dairy farms selling raw milk for cheese production voluntarily test their milk weekly despite not being required by federal guidelines. This proactive approach demonstrates how producers can take the initiative to protect their businesses and public health.

Practical Biosecurity Protocols for Dairy Operations

The outbreak necessitates heightened biosecurity measures for all dairy operations:

Worker Protection: Use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when working with potentially infected animals, particularly during milking.

Milk Segregation: Milk from clinically ill cows should not enter the bulk tank and should be diverted or destroyed rather than entering the food supply.

Calf Feeding Safety: Heat-treat milk before feeding to calves from herds with known or suspected infections using validated temperature-time combinations.

Water Management: Clean and disinfect all livestock watering devices and isolate drinking water that might be contaminated by waterfowl, as they may be vectors for the virus.

Testing and Monitoring: Implement regular testing of bulk tank milk, particularly in affected regions, and report any suspicious symptoms to state veterinary authorities.

Isolation Protocols: Segregate clinically ill cows from the rest of the milking herd to prevent further spread within the operation.

Global Context and Comparative Regulations

While this outbreak has primarily affected U.S. dairy operations, its implications extend globally, particularly regarding regulatory approaches to raw milk products. The U.S. FDA prohibits raw milk in interstate commerce but allows states to regulate intrastate sales, resulting in 30 states permitting some form of raw milk sales.

In contrast, European regulations, particularly for the protected designation of origin cheeses like Brie and Camembert, allow raw milk to be used under specific conditions even after antibiotic treatment of cows. These regulatory differences highlight where American dairy producers face stricter standards during zoonotic outbreaks than some European counterparts.

Bottom Line: Risk Assessment and Business Continuity

The comprehensive scientific evidence confirms that:

  1. Pasteurized milk and dairy products remain entirely safe for consumption, with multiple studies confirming pasteurization’s effectiveness against H5N1.
  2. Raw milk from infected herds poses potential risks, with H5N1 surviving even through traditional aging processes in cheese production.
  3. Dairy operations can continue functioning safely by implementing appropriate biosecurity measures and following USDA/FDA guidance.

Agricultural authorities have expressed confidence that “unlike affected poultry, there will be no need to depopulate dairy herds. Cattle are expected to recover fully.” This assessment suggests the dairy industry can navigate this challenge with proper management while maintaining production.

The National Milk Producers Federation works closely with USDA and other stakeholders, emphasizing “the importance of practical, science-based solutions that enhance disease monitoring and prevention while ensuring business continuity for dairy farmers.”

HPAI Herd Risk Assessment: Is Your Operation Vulnerable?

Dairy producers should evaluate their operation’s vulnerability to H5N1 introduction and spread:

Geographic Exposure: Are you located in or near states with confirmed cases?

Water Source Risk: Does your operation have ponds or features that attract wild waterfowl?

Biosecurity Infrastructure: Do you have foot baths, dedicated clothing, and visitor restrictions?

Herd Health Monitoring: What is your protocol for identifying and segregating sick animals?

Testing Frequency: How often are you sampling bulk tank milk for potential pathogens?

Producer Challenge: Take Action Today

Test your bulk tank milk this week and share your proactive approach with fellow producers through industry forums. The science is precise: pasteurization works, but prevention remains the best protection.

By understanding the definitive research on H5N1 in dairy and implementing appropriate biosecurity measures, producers can protect their herds, their workers, and the continued safety of the dairy supply chain. Participating in voluntary testing programs safeguards your operation and strengthens the entire industry’s resilience against this unprecedented challenge.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

West Virginia Legalizes Raw Milk Sales: What Consumers and Farmers Need to Know

Uncover the implications of West Virginia’s newly enacted raw milk legislation for both consumers and farmers. Do you understand the potential risks and rewards of consuming unpasteurized milk? Find out more today.

West Virginia has legalized the retail sale of raw, unpasteurized milk. Effective June after its approval in March, this change reshapes the state’s dairy industry. Farmers can now sell raw milk without a license, potentially boosting revenue. This policy shift increases consumer access to raw milk and opens up new opportunities for dairy farmers. Consumers advocating for raw milk’s health benefits can access it more conveniently with mandatory safety warnings. The label must state “unpasteurized raw milk” and include the seller’s name, address, and production date.

The Pre-Legislation Landscape: Herd Shares and Limited Access to Raw Milk 

Before the recent legislation, West Virginia residents navigated a complex landscape to access raw milk. The consumption of raw milk has been legally permissible through herd-sharing programs since 2016. These herd shares allowed consumers to purchase a stake in a cow, thus granting them part ownership and a consistent supply of unpasteurized milk from their animals. This involved a financial investment in the cow, which in turn provided a regular supply of raw milk. However, retail sales of raw milk were prohibited, limiting broader consumer access and confining the distribution primarily to those involved in these specific arrangements. The passage of House Bill 4911, which sailed through the state senate with a 28 to 5 vote and the house of delegates at 76 to 19, marks a significant shift in policy, broadening the availability of raw milk beyond the confines of herd shares. This legislative change bypassed the governor’s veto or signature, highlighting a solid legislative move towards dairy deregulation and expanding consumer choice within the state.

A Paradigm Shift: New Raw Milk Regulations in West Virginia

The new legislation marks a significant shift in West Virginia’s regulatory landscape for dairy products, specifically raw milk. Sellers no longer need a license to retail unpasteurized milk, but labeling requirements are strict. Each bottle must state “unpasteurized raw milk” and include the seller’s name, address, and production date. 

The law mandates a clear warning about the increased risk of foodborne illnesses associated with consuming unpasteurized dairy to mitigate health risks. This label aims to inform consumers of potential health hazards, promoting informed decision-making.

Current Regulatory Gaps Pose Challenges for Producers and Consumers Alike 

The current regulatory gaps in West Virginia’s raw milk law pose significant concerns, leaving producers and consumers navigating uncertain terrain. Without specific guidelines, sellers must only follow essential labeling and risk warning requirements. The lack of a mandated licensing system or formal inspection protocol raises questions about consumer safety. 

Regulations anticipated after 2025: Comprehensive regulations are expected past the 2025 legislative session, leaving a temporary oversight vacuum. This delay is crucial for public health and addressing critics’ concerns about raw milk risks. 

No inspection and testing funding: Unlike other states, West Virginia’s law does not allocate funds for routine inspections or pathogen testing, such as E. coli. This shortfall requires farmers to self-monitor and urges consumers to be diligent. The Ag Department recommends self-regulation, proper insurance, and consumer vigilance. 

These gaps highlight the need for a detailed regulatory framework and adequate enforcement resources as the state advances with raw milk legalization.

Consumer Vigilance: Navigating the New Raw Milk Market in West Virginia

Consumers must be informed and cautious as the raw milk market opens in West Virginia. Given the health risks of unpasteurized milk, knowing your source is crucial. Research the farm, read reviews, and visit to observe their practices. Communicate directly with the seller to address any questions. 

Health authorities like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention link raw milk to illnesses like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria. Despite purported benefits, the risk of bacterial contamination is significant. Assess the farm’s cleanliness, animal health, and milk handling practices. It’s important to note that while raw milk may offer nutritional benefits, it also carries a higher risk of foodborne illnesses due to the absence of pasteurization. Therefore, consumers should be aware of these risks and take necessary precautions when considering raw milk as a food option. 

Due to the lack of mandatory testing or inspections, personal vigilance is essential. Ask farmers for their testing results, but remember you are responsible for mitigating risks. Learn the symptoms of foodborne illnesses and take immediate action if they appear after consumption. 

In summary, while legalizing raw milk sales in West Virginia brings new opportunities, it comes with responsibilities. Consumers are empowered to make informed choices and protect their health by researching sellers, understanding risks, and staying vigilant.

Farmers’ Responsibilities Under Scrutiny: Ensuring Safety and Quality in the Raw Milk Market 

With West Virginia’s raw milk regulations still developing, farmers are responsible for ensuring product safety. Since the new law doesn’t mandate state inspections or testing, farmers must perform their checks for contaminants like E. coli. Securing adequate insurance is vital to protect their businesses and build consumer trust. These voluntary practices are essential as the state finalizes its regulatory framework.

West Virginia’s Lenient Raw Milk Regulations: A Case of Deregulation and Consumer Choice

West Virginia’s raw milk regulation is significantly more lenient than states like Pennsylvania, marking a shift towards deregulation and consumer choice. In West Virginia, no license is required to sell raw milk. Sellers only need to label products as “unpasteurized raw milk” with their name, address, and production date, along with a warning about foodborne illness risks. 

In contrast, Pennsylvania’s proactive regulatory approach requires sellers to obtain a license, ensuring compliance with safety standards. The state sued a farmer after raw milk products were linked to illnesses, highlighting a regulatory system focused on consumer protection. This comparison shows how states like West Virginia and Pennsylvania balance public health concerns with market freedom.

The Federal-State Dichotomy: Navigating Raw Milk Regulations

The FDA bans the sale of raw milk across state lines federally due to the risks of bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria. However, states are increasingly revisiting raw milk laws. 

This year, Delaware has pushed toward legalization, Rhode Island debated it, and New Jersey touched on the topic during a budget hearing. In the Northeast, New York and Pennsylvania already allow raw milk sales with strict rules. 

Consumer demand and the need for new revenue streams for dairy farmers fuel the drive to change these laws. Supporters argue that raw milk can boost local agriculture and offer natural food options. At the same time, critics maintain that pasteurization is crucial for safety. 

As states like West Virginia adopt more flexible raw milk laws, the debate persists, engaging all stakeholders in a conversation about balancing consumer choice and agricultural viability with public health safety. 

Raw Milk: A Contentious Debate of Health Benefits vs. Safety Risks

The debate surrounding raw milk is both passionate and complex. Proponents argue that raw milk offers superior nutritional content, improved digestion, and enhanced immunity. They claim that pasteurization effectively kills harmful bacteria and destroys valuable enzymes and vitamins. Advocates suggest that raw milk supports gut health due to its probiotic properties and can alleviate lactose intolerance and allergies. They emphasize its traditional and natural aspects, presenting raw milk as a more “wholesome” option. 

Critics, including the FDA and CDC, raise significant safety concerns. They highlight the risks of bacterial contamination from pathogens like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria, which can cause severe foodborne illnesses, particularly in vulnerable populations. The average of 3.9 foodborne illnesses per year in West Virginia underscores these dangers. Critics argue that the health benefits of raw milk do not outweigh its risks, advocating for pasteurization as a safer alternative without compromising nutritional value. 

Ultimately, the clash centers on balancing perceived health benefits against known health risks. While supporters value raw milk for its natural benefits and taste, critics emphasize the serious safety hazards and advocate for pasteurization.

Avian Influenza: An Emerging Threat Complicates the Raw Milk Saga

Furthermore, the recent discovery of avian influenza in cows heightens concerns about raw milk safety. Although the virus’s transmission in cows is still being studied, its potential risk to human health is significant. Though speculative, the possibility of contracting avian influenza through milk highlights the need for vigilance. 

Pasteurization is a crucial defense, effectively killing harmful pathogens, including viruses like avian influenza. Pasteurization destroys microorganisms by heating milk to a specific temperature, ensuring consumer safety. Advocates of raw milk must consider these established safety measures. Until we have conclusive data on avian influenza in milk, pasteurization remains the safest option to protect public health.

The Bottom Line

West Virginia’s legalization of raw milk sales introduces new opportunities for local dairy farms. Still, it comes with significant safety and regulatory challenges. Effective without extensive oversight or state-funded inspections, the law requires farmers to ensure their milk is safe and insured. Consumers must be proactive, researching their sources to reduce health risks. This new framework requires all parties to make informed decisions, balancing potential benefits against the dangers of unpasteurized milk.

Key Takeaways:

  • Raw milk retail sales are now legal in West Virginia as of June, following approval in March.
  • No license is required for selling raw milk, but the product must have a clear label stating “unpasteurized raw milk” along with the seller’s details and production date.
  • Raw milk labels must include a warning about the increased risk of foodborne illnesses.
  • Comprehensive regulations for raw milk are not expected until after the 2025 legislative session.
  • The new law does not provide funding for inspections or product testing, a step required in many other states.
  • Farmers are recommended to conduct their own testing and ensure they have sufficient insurance coverage.
  • Consumers are encouraged to research and understand the sources of their raw milk purchases.
  • Federal rules still prohibit raw milk sales across state lines; laws within states like West Virginia are crucial for local access.
  • Before legalization, raw milk was only accessible through herd share agreements in West Virginia.
  • Other states are also reconsidering raw milk regulations, reflecting a wider interest in the issue.

Summary:

West Virginia has legalized the retail sale of raw, unpasteurized milk, a significant shift in the state’s dairy industry. Farmers can now sell raw milk without a license, potentially boosting revenue and increasing consumer access. The legislation mandates safety warnings on the label, including the seller’s name, address, and production date. Previously, raw milk consumption was permissible through herd-sharing programs since 2016, but retail sales were prohibited. The passage of House Bill 4911 marks a solid legislative move towards dairy deregulation and expanding consumer choice within the state. However, current regulatory gaps pose significant concerns for producers and consumers. Without specific guidelines, sellers must only follow essential labeling and risk warning requirements. The lack of a mandated licensing system or formal inspection protocol raises questions about consumer safety. Comprehensive regulations are expected past the 2025 legislative session, leaving a temporary oversight vacuum crucial for public health and addressing critics’ concerns about raw milk risks. Farmers are responsible for ensuring product safety, and securing adequate insurance is vital to protect their businesses and build consumer trust.

Learn more:

Send this to a friend