Archive for market share

EU-China Dairy Trade Dispute Intensifies: What It Means for Global Markets

Curious about the EU-China dairy trade dispute and its global impact? Find out how this conflict could reshape the dairy industry.

Summary: In a significant escalation of international trade tensions, China has launched an anti-subsidy investigation into European Union (EU) dairy exports, igniting global concerns. The probe, announced by China’s Ministry of Commerce, aims to scrutinize subsidies provided to EU dairy farmers, suspecting these financial supports have unfairly bolstered the competitiveness of EU dairy products in the Chinese market. This move is perceived as a retaliatory action following the EU’s tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The investigation, set to span over a year, will examine imports dating back to early 2023, potentially resulting in substantial tariffs or restrictions on European dairy products entering China. The EU-China dairy trade dispute is rooted in the complex global commerce network and regulatory procedures, focusing on major European exports like fresh cheese, milk, and cream and examining 20 subsidy schemes. European organizations like FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland collaborate with investigating agencies to demonstrate compliance with international trade standards. If the charges are confirmed, EU dairy imports may face severe taxes or limitations, impacting European farmers and altering global trade dynamics. Major dairy exporters like New Zealand and the United States also stand to be affected. European dairy associations, such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca, are calling for assistance measures to support European farmers amid this looming trade conflict.

  • China initiates an anti-subsidy probe into EU dairy exports, citing unfair competitive advantages due to subsidies.
  • The investigation could lead to significant tariffs or restrictions on EU dairy products entering China.
  • The probe is seen as a retaliatory measure following the EU’s tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
  • Investigation covers key dairy products like fresh cheese, milk, and cream, examining 20 different subsidy schemes.
  • European dairy organizations, including FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland, are working to prove compliance with international trade rules.
  • The outcome of the probe may substantially impact European dairy farmers and shift global trade dynamics.
  • New Zealand and the United States, major dairy exporters to China, might also feel the repercussions.
  • European associations such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca are urging for measures to support farmers during this trade dispute.
EU-China dairy trade dispute, Chinese Ministry of Commerce, improper subsidies, European dairy producers, global commerce network, regulatory procedures, state subsidies, unfair edge, European market, major European exports, dairy products, EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), potential losses, Irish dairy exports, investigating agencies, international trade standards, Chinese inquiry, fresh cheese, milk, cream, subsidy schemes, severe taxes, limitations, European farmers, global trade relations, New Zealand, United States, market share, supply chain, price volatility, AHDB, powder prices, global production, pricing plans, larger-scale precedent, European dairy associations, Eucolait, Copa Cogeca, labor conflict, assistance measures, adverse effects, local production, self-sufficiency, market share, European dairy farmers, new markets.

The EU-China dairy trade battle is rapidly escalating, and it’s about more than just milk and cheese. What is really at stake here? According to Eucolait, the European umbrella group for the dairy sector, ‘For many years now, the European Union has proven to be a reliable supplier of high-quality dairy products and ingredients to the Chinese market.’ It is alarming that dairy will be sacrificed in an industrial dispute over electric automobiles. The European Commission should urgently and decisively act to resolve this trade dispute. The need for a swift resolution is paramount. Let’s investigate the specifics and understand how this conflict will impact global markets.

Background: The Catalyst for Conflict 

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has probed potential improper subsidies for European dairy producers. This measure primarily avenges the EU’s levies on Chinese electric automobiles. What is the true story behind these tit-for-tat measures?

The conflict is rooted in the complex global commerce network and regulatory procedures. Earlier this year, the European Commission placed duties on imported electric cars from China, citing worries over state subsidies that allegedly provided Chinese manufacturers an unfair edge in the European market. In response, China focuses on major European exports such as dairy products, which are heavily subsidized by the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

This growing situation highlights the giant geopolitical chess game in which big economies use trade policy as instruments of influence. Chinese authorities claim that EU subsidies under different CAP programs, such as critical income assistance and incentives for young farmers, create an unfair playing field for domestic dairy producers. On the other hand, the EU believes that its subsidies are entirely compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) standards, characterizing China’s measures as excessive and politically motivated.

The stakes are enormous, with potential losses well beyond the sectors directly involved. For instance, Irish dairy exports to China were €426 million (US$487 million) in 2023, with an estimated €46 million at risk due to the current investigation. Organizations such as FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland are ready to collaborate with investigating agencies to demonstrate compliance with international trade standards. The gravity of these potential losses underscores the need for swift resolution.

This disagreement highlights an important point: the global marketplace is always susceptible to the ebb and flow of international politics and policy choices. Despite its isolated character, the dairy industry is now embroiled in a more significant economic battle between two economic behemoths, highlighting the interwoven nature of contemporary commerce.

The Stakes: What’s Under Investigation? 

The Chinese inquiry targets dairy products, including fresh cheese, milk, and cream. It looks at 20 subsidy schemes that give EU dairy an unfair edge. How may this affect the global dairy market?

First, if the inquiry confirms the charges, EU dairy imports may face severe taxes or limitations. This would not just hurt European farmers but also change global trade relations. Key exporters like New Zealand and the United States may embrace the chance to boost their market share in China.

Furthermore, interruptions in the supply chain might cause price volatility. For example, the UK’s AHDB has said that rising milk output had already dragged down powder prices. Further limitations might worsen the trend, affecting global production and pricing plans.

This investigation might create a larger-scale precedent, prompting other governments to study subsidies and trade practices more closely. The European Commission’s challenging approach to protecting its policies and sectors may result in comparable reprisals, culminating in a more significant trade battle.

This probe is more than just a bilateral disagreement; it can affect global dairy markets, altering everything from price to international trade ties. How the EU and China handle this will influence the industry’s environment for years.

Industry Reactions: Voices From the Field

European dairy associations, such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca, are outraged. They say the dairy industry is unjustly pulled into an unrelated labor conflict. What are their worries, and how do they intend to respond? Let’s look at their opinions.

Eucolait, the European dairy industry’s umbrella body, vigorously opposed the inquiry. They argue, “It is unjust that dairy will be sacrificed in an industrial fight over electric automobiles. The European Commission should do all it can to resolve this trade dispute as soon as possible [source]. Their biggest worry is the impact such investigations may have on the global dairy industry, possibly influencing pricing and trading routes.

In a social media post, Copa Cogeca shared similar sentiments: “This further escalation in the EU-China trade relationship and the continuous impact on our sector is very worrying.” They emphasize that European dairy farmers and agricultural cooperatives produce and export in complete compliance with EU and WTO standards. The association cautions against what they see as an unjustified challenge to the EU’s Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) and calls for a strong reaction from the European Commission to protect the industry’s interests.

These organizations are actively advocating for speedy and decisive action. Eucolait has encouraged EU officials to prioritize diplomatic resolution of the dairy trade problem, highlighting the historical significance of EU-China trade ties. Meanwhile, Copa Cogeca calls for extensive assistance measures to mitigate any adverse effects on European farmers throughout the probe.

Market Impact: Shifting Trade Dynamics 

China has traditionally been a major importer of EU dairy goods. Nonetheless, recent statistics show a significant decrease in these imports owing to increasing local production and a goal for self-sufficiency. This current probe into EU dairy subsidies may accelerate this trend, possibly reshaping global trade patterns.

The inquiry may encourage Chinese purchasers to seek dairy goods from non-EU suppliers, such as New Zealand, which now accounts for 51% of China’s dairy imports. Countries like the United States and other non-EU territories may experience an increase in their export quantities to China.

This investigation might result in a loss of market share for the EU, requiring European dairy farmers to seek new markets or strengthen partnerships with current ones. This transition might influence global supply chains, boosting competitiveness among dairy producers.

On the price front, the study might increase market volatility. Reduced demand from China may result in an excess of dairy products in the EU, putting downward pressure on pricing inside Europe. In contrast, nations that gain from filling the Chinese market vacuum may see price hikes owing to increased demand.

These changes may result in worldwide fluctuations in dairy product pricing for consumers and merchants. Market players must remain adaptable and sensitive to changing trade dynamics to reduce risks and capitalize on new possibilities.

As this inquiry progresses, the global dairy business confronts uncertainty and possible disruption, highlighting the interconnectedness of international commerce and the consequences of governmental choices.

Global Players: Who Stands to Gain or Lose? 

New Zealand and the United States are critical participants in China’s dairy import sector, with shares of 51% and 13%, respectively. With the European Union under examination, these nations may perceive an opportunity to increase their market presence. Could this move usher in a new era for the global dairy trade?

Any interruption in EU dairy imports might increase New Zealand’s export potential. According to Rabobank, China’s milk output will grow by 3.2% in 2024. However, this does not eliminate the demand for imported dairy products, exceptionally high-quality and specialized commodities [Rabobank Report 2024].

The United States, now China’s second-largest dairy exporter, may gain from the EU’s prospective trade restrictions. However, difficulties in trade dynamics, such as extra tariffs, logistical hurdles, and geopolitical conflicts, may impact how much of this market share can be successfully captured.

On the other hand, if channeled to different markets to avoid additional Chinese tariffs, an abundance of dairy goods from the EU might drive down world prices. According to the UK’s Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB), China’s drop in powder imports has already impacted global markets [AHDB Report, 2024].

Ultimately, the global dairy trading picture might change dramatically. Nations such as New Zealand and the United States may benefit in the short term. Still, long-term stability will be determined by how international markets respond to these new trade dynamics.

EU’s Stand: Defending the Dairy Sector 

The European Commission has pledged to safeguard its dairy sector and maintain WTO compliance. But how successful will these methods be in combating China’s investigation? The EU’s case is based on establishing that its subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other national programs conform with international trade regulations. Furthermore, working with Chinese officials is critical to mitigating the damage.

Olof Gill, a Commission spokeswoman, said that the EU would “follow the proceeding very closely” and “intervene as appropriate” to preserve its interests. This aggressive attitude signals a strong defense, but the controversial nature of the investigation and prior trade friction may hamper settlement attempts. The EU intends to negotiate this complicated trade issue by preserving openness and open conversation while avoiding aggravating tensions.

The Bottom Line

This issue is more than simply a commercial conflict; it reflects deeper geopolitical concerns and emphasizes the interconnectedness of global commerce. Actions in one industry, such as electric cars, may have far-reaching consequences in other sectors, such as dairy. It also emphasizes the strategic use of trade instruments as leverage in more significant geopolitical issues and the fundamental need to adhere to international trade laws. As the situation evolves, firms, governments, and analysts must adjust to a world where trade policy plays a critical part in geopolitical strategy, possibly dictating future global trade dynamics.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Defending Dairy: Countering the Push for Plant-Based School Lunch Menus

Activists are pushing for plant-based school menus. Learn how to protect dairy in schools and counter their influence.

Imagine your child’s school lunch menu shifting from milk and chicken nuggets to tofu wraps and almond milk. With vegan activists progressively advocating for ‘plant-based’ diets in schools, the need for immediate action to change the nutrition for millions of pupils becomes increasingly urgent. This paper investigates the emergence of this movement and its ramifications for the dairy sector and children’s nutritional welfare.

The goal is to find activists’ tactics—from grassroots campaigns in primary schools to college policy changes. Although the shift towards better food options is admirable, we must also consider the potential benefits of this change, particularly its positive effects on the dairy sector and children’s nutritional welfare. This paper aims to shed light on these hopeful outcomes.

The Humane Society of the United States, a leading advocate for animal welfare, wants half of school lunches to be plant-based by 2027. We will review case studies like the University of Michigan’s commitment to cutting animal-based alternatives, examine the most recent AVA Summit in Washington, D.C., and provide actions dairy supporters may take to buck these trends. This problem addresses dietary freedom, financial livelihoods, and essential elements of nutritional education in modern societies.

The Shifting Sands of School Menus: Navigating the Rise of Plant-Based Choices 

Targeted lobbying is driving the growing momentum for plant-based diets in schools. Universities ranging from Western Oregon University to the University of Michigan and the University of Wisconsin-Madison have drastically cut animal-based meals. By providing more plant-based choices, the University of Michigan, for example, is actively striving toward sustainability objectives.

Currently, plant-based options account for up to 20% of meals in K–12 classrooms, while colleges and institutions show higher percentages of 20% to 30%. This discrepancy shows different degrees of acceptance and application across various phases of schooling. With a strong push towards changing eating alternatives, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) wants to increase plant-based meals to 50% by 2027.

Important events highlighting the need to integrate younger generations include the Animal & Vegan Advocacy (AVA) Summit in Washington, D.C. Integrating more plant-based options on school menus, advocates seek to inculcate lifetime behaviors emphasizing animal kindness and environmental sustainability.

Activists’ Multi-Pronged Strategy to Plant the Seeds of Change 

Advocates use a diverse strategy to support plant-based diets in schools. Emphasizing the need to address younger audiences—from kindergarten—at the AVA Summit in Washington, D.C., the Early introductions of plant-based ideas seek to instill these ideals into the way of life of youngsters, so vegan alternatives appeal more as they grow.

Crucially important is social media outreach. Facebook, Instagram, and TikHub, activists interact with a large audience, sharing knowledge and success stories. This digital approach uses popular culture and young trends to make plant-based diets attractive and readily available.

Crucially, there are also relationships with young-targeted brands. Working with well-known businesses that appeal to younger groups helps include plant-based messages in goods and marketing initiatives targeted at children and teens. These alliances help make plant-based options on school menus more legitimate and accessible.

These tactics ultimately seek to standardize school plant-based diets, continuously impacting schools. Early education, internet interaction, and deliberate brand partnerships try to change younger generations’ nutritional tastes toward more plant-based choices.

Repercussions on the Dairy Industry: Navigating a New Norm 

The growing number of plant-based meals offered at colleges and universities may significantly change the dairy sector. Traditional dairy products may lose the market as educational institutions move toward plant-based options, endangering the lives of dairy farmers who have long been vital agricultural community members. Less young people drawn to dairy might affect the long-term demand for milk, cheese, and yogurt, influencing the whole supply chain.

Dairy farmers might have to vary their offerings to incorporate plant-based substitutes or risk losing market share to new rivals. Companies that have previously invested in plant-based dairy alternatives might have an advantage, forcing conventional dairy farmers to create or collaborate with plant-based companies. This change might also impact allied businesses, such as equipment makers, veterinary services, and feed producers, and, therefore, influence the whole agriculture industry.

A Proactive Approach to Ensuring Dairy’s Place in School Meals 

To counteract the rising push for plant-based menus, it’s crucial to implement a robust strategy advocating for dairy in school meals. Here are actionable steps: 

  1. Nutritional Education Initiatives 
    Develop comprehensive nutrition education programs that highlight dairy’s benefits. Emphasize essential nutrients like calcium, vitamin D, and protein in milk, cheese, and yogurt. Conduct workshops with dietitians to engage students and parents in understanding dairy’s role in a balanced diet. 
  2. Establishing Strong Partnerships with Schools 
    Forge partnerships with local schools to ensure dairy remains on menus. Collaborate with school nutritionists to create appealing dairy-rich meal options. Sponsoring school events and wellness programs can keep dairy at the forefront of students’ choices.
  3. Highlighting Balanced Diets 
    Promote balanced diets through campaigns focusing on the synergy between food groups. Use social media, newsletters, and community outreach to share how dairy, whole grains, fruits, and vegetables contribute to health. Professional testimonials add credibility.
  4. Dairy-Focused Campaigns and Initiatives 
    Implement campaigns showcasing dairy’s benefits. Activities can include dairy-tasting events, farm tours, and cooking classes. Collaborate with school TV channels and online portals to stream educational content on dairy farming and its dietary role. 
  5. Student and Parent Engagement
    Organize informational sessions and participatory activities for students and parents. Create programs where children learn to prepare meals with dairy—host parent-teacher meetings to address nutritional concerns and respond to plant-based arguments.
  6. Showcasing Dairy’s Role in Local Economies 
    Highlight how dairy farming benefits local economies. Present data on jobs and revenue generated by the dairy industry in-school presentations and community events to foster support for local dairy farmers. 

Implementing these strategies will ensure that dairy’s benefits are well-communicated and appreciated, safeguarding its place in future dietary choices.

Notable Success Stories in Dairy Promotion

The NFL’s “Fuel Up to Play 60” initiative, sponsored by the National Dairy Council, is one noteworthy success story. This program advances school dairy consumption by promoting better living with nutrient-dense foods like milk, cheese, and yogurt. Higher demand for dairy in program cafeterias by schools has been noted, therefore stressing its influence on school menus.

The Dairy Council of California’s “Dairy Optimization in School Meals” project is another outstanding effort. This initiative offers instructional materials on the advantages of dairy and teaches school nutrition personnel to include dairy in well-balanced meals. Participating schools have seen improved diversity and quality of dairy products, raising student happiness and involvement in school lunch programs.

The Bottom Line

Unquestionably, plant-based activists are making significant breakthroughs within academic buildings as we negotiate the changing dynamics of school meals. Driven by activists committed to imprinting their beliefs in the next generation, the demand for “plant-based” alternatives in schools is expanding. This endeavor differs from early kindergarten influence to alliances with young-oriented companies and social media marketing.

By 2027, organizations like the Humane Society of the United States want more plant-based meals available at K–12 institutions, colleges, and universities. Survey data and favorable taste-testing event answers indicate an increasing student inclination for these alternatives. For the dairy sector, this change offers both possibilities and difficulties; it must change to stay in school meals.

The consequences are significant, pointing to a societal change toward a more plant-based future connected with ethical and environmental issues. Strong school alliances, nutritional education, and campaigns stressing balanced meals, including dairy, should form part of our proactive strategy. Although the emergence of plant-based meals at educational institutions poses difficulties, it also enables the dairy sector to interact significantly with the younger generation. The encouragement of dairy’s advantages and local economic contributions can guarantee that it remains a mainstay of school food.

Key Takeaways:

  • Vegan and animal rights activists are advocating for increased “plant-based” menus in K-12 schools, colleges, and universities.
  • Institutions like the University of Michigan, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Western Oregon University have pledged to reduce animal-based choices.
  • The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) aims for 50% of institutional dining program meals to come from “plant-based” sources by 2027.
  • Currently, “plant-based” offerings comprise 20% to 30% of college and university menus but only up to 20% of school district menus.
  • The AVA Summit emphasized indoctrinating younger children, starting from kindergarten, to further vegan and animal rights agendas.
  • Activists employ strategies like social media outreach, university campus tables, and partnerships with youth-focused brands to gain interest.
  • Dairy advocates can mitigate the influence of these activists by adopting proactive measures.

Summary:

Vegan activists are advocating for plant-based diets in schools, causing a shift in nutrition for millions of students. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) aims to increase plant-based meals to 50% by 2027, addressing dietary freedom, financial livelihoods, and essential elements of nutritional education. Advocates use various strategies, including grassroots campaigns, social media outreach, and working with young-targeted brands to make plant-based options more accessible. However, the growing number of plant-based meals in colleges and universities may significantly change the dairy sector, potentially affecting traditional dairy products and endangering dairy farmers. Dairy farmers may have to adapt their offerings to incorporate plant-based substitutes or risk losing market share to new competitors. Companies that have invested in plant-based dairy alternatives may have an advantage, forcing conventional dairy farmers to create or collaborate with plant-based companies. To counteract this trend, a proactive approach to advocating for dairy in school meals is crucial, including developing comprehensive nutrition education programs, establishing strong partnerships with schools, and promoting balanced diets through campaigns focusing on the synergy between food groups.

Learn more:

Unexpected Trends in the U.S. Dairy Industry: Fluid Milk Sales and Cheese Exports Rise Amid Steady Decline in Milk Production

Discover why U.S. fluid milk sales and cheese exports are surging despite a decline in production. How is this shift impacting the dairy market? Read more to find out.

person using MacBook pro

Unexpectedly for the U.S. dairy business, fluid milk sales and cheese exports are rising even as milk output steadily declines. Adjusting for the leap year, fluid milk sales jumped by about 100 million pounds in the first four months of the year over the previous year. Cheese exports concurrently reach a record 8.7 percent of total output from February to April, the most ever for any three months or even one month. These unexpected patterns can be attributed to a variety of factors, including changing consumer preferences, global market dynamics, and technological advancements in dairy production. The wider consequences for the dairy industry, such as shifts in market share and potential economic impacts, are also investigated in this paper.

Despite the challenges of falling milk output, the U.S. dairy industry is demonstrating remarkable resilience with the rise in fluid milk and cheese exports. This unexpected trend holds promising implications for producers and consumers, instilling a sense of hope and optimism in the industry.

As the dairy industry negotiates these changes, fast rises in cheese prices have significantly raised the Class III price, underlining the market’s reaction. Examine the elements underlying these patterns and the possible long-term effects on domestic consumption and foreign commerce.

A Surprising Rebound: Fluid Milk Sales Surge Amid Shifting Consumer Preferences

MonthFluid Milk Sales (million pounds)
May 20224,500
June 20224,450
July 20224,470
August 20224,480
September 20224,460
October 20224,490
November 20224,500
December 20224,510
January 20234,520
February 20234,530
March 20234,550
April 20234,600

With a roughly 100 million pound gain and a 0.7 percent leap year-adjusted surge, this unprecedented spike in fluid milk sales highlights a dramatic change in consumer behavior. Rising health awareness and the availability of dairy substitutes have usually been causing fluid milk intake to drop. But this increase might point to changing market dynamics or fresh enthusiasm for milk’s nutritious value.

Dairy ProductChange in Consumption (Percentage)
Fluid Milk+0.7%
American Cheese-1.2%
Yogurt+2.4%
Non-American Cheeses+1.5%
Butter-0.8%
Ice Cream-1.0%

The changes in domestic dairy consumption create a complicated scene for the American dairy business. While butter, ice cream, and American cheese consumption have dropped, fluid milk sales may have increased due to changing habits or knowledge of nutritional value. Growing worries about health, animal welfare, and environmental damage define this downturn.

On the other hand, demand for yogurt and non-American cheeses has surged. Yogurt’s probiotics and health advantages attract health-conscious customers. Non-American cheeses benefit from their superior quality, appeal to refined tastes, and clean-label tendencies.

This difference draws attention to shifting customer demands and the need for dairy farmers to adjust. Stakeholders trying to seize market possibilities in a dynamic economic environment must first understand these trends.

American Cheese Exports Set New Record: A Game-Changer for the U.S. Dairy Market

The U.S. dairy market has witnessed a notable shift in export trends over the past year, which can largely be attributed to evolving global demand and intensified trade relations. Cheese exports, in particular, have set new benchmarks, reflecting both opportunities and challenges in the international marketplace. Below is a detailed table outlining the changes in cheese exports over the past year: 

MonthCheese Exports (Million Pounds)Year-over-Year Change (%)
January 2023605.2%
February 2023584.9%
March 2023657.5%
April 2023709.8%
May 20237211.1%
June 2023688.3%
July 20237510.7%
August 20238012.5%
September 20237811.4%
October 20238213.2%
November 20238514.1%
December 20238815.3%
  • Key Export Markets: Japan, Mexico, South Korea
  • Emerging Opportunities: Southeast Asia, Middle East
  • Challenges: Trade policies, supply chain disruptions

With 8.7% of total output moving abroad, the United States saw an increase in cheese exports between February and April. This fantastic number emphasizes the increasing worldwide market for American cheese. The milestone points to a change in the strategic emphasis of the U.S. dairy sector as producers show their capacity to meet and surpass the demands of foreign markets, therefore implying a future in which exports will be more important economically.

Milk Production Plunge: Unpacking the Multifaceted Decline in the U.S. Dairy Sector 

In examining the shifting landscape of the U.S. dairy market, it’s imperative to consider the nuances in milk productiontrends that have unfolded over the past year. These trends highlight the recent downturn in production and provide a lens through which we can better understand the broader dynamics at play. 

MonthMilk Production (billion pounds)% Change (Year-over-Year)
April 202218.1-0.4%
March 202217.9-0.5%
February 202216.0-0.6%
January 202217.5-0.7%
December 202117.7-0.8%
November 202116.8-0.9%
October 202116.9-1.0%
September 202116.0-1.1%
August 202118.0-1.2%
July 202118.2-1.3%
June 202117.8-1.4%
May 202118.1-1.5%

Adjusting for the leap year, the continuous reduction in U.S. milk production—0.4 percent in April—has lasted 10 months. For the dairy sector, this development begs serious questions.

Many factors are driving this slump. First, dairy farmers have been under pressure from changing consumer tastes that influence demand. Growing demand for plant-based and dairy substitutes is reshaping the market share controlled initially by cow’s milk. Furthermore, changing customer behavior and ethical and environmental issues influence production levels.

The low cow count raises yet another critical question. Modern and conventional dairy states have battled dwindling or stagnating cow numbers. Growth patterns in cow counts have slowed dramatically in contemporary dairy states since 2008; some years even show reductions. This has lowered milk availability, together with a volatile macroeconomic backdrop.

Dairy farmers also face many operational difficulties, such as supply chain interruptions, personnel shortages, and the need for fresh technologies. These problems tax the industry’s ability to sustain past output levels even as manufacturers seek creative ideas.

Dealing with these entwined problems would help to stop the drop in output and guarantee the resilience and sustainability of the American dairy market against changing consumer tastes and financial uncertainty.

Turbulent Trends: How Consumer Values and Supply Chain Challenges Propelled Cheese Prices Skyward

The past year has witnessed significant fluctuations in the dairy market, with particular emphasis on cheese prices, which have experienced rapid increases. This section breaks down the price trends over the past year to provide a comprehensive understanding of the market dynamics. 

MonthClass III Milk Price (per cwt)Cheese Price (per lb)Butter Price (per lb)
May 2022$25.21$2.29$2.68
June 2022$24.33$2.21$2.65
July 2022$22.52$2.00$2.61
August 2022$20.10$1.95$2.50
September 2022$21.86$2.10$2.55
October 2022$21.15$2.03$2.53
November 2022$20.72$2.01$2.60
December 2022$21.55$2.05$2.58
January 2023$20.25$1.98$2.55
February 2023$18.67$1.85$2.50
March 2023$19.97$1.92$2.55
April 2023$20.25$2.01$2.52
May 2023$23.30$2.35$2.70

Many complex elements reflecting more significant market dynamics drove the increase in cheese prices throughout May. The dairy sector has seen a paradigm change as consumer tastes center on health, environmental issues, and animal welfare more and more. These higher ethical standards call for more rigorous behavior, which drives manufacturing costs. A turbulent macroeconomic climate, ongoing supply chain interruptions, and workforce difficulties further limit cheese supplies. Cheese prices skyrocketed as demand for premium dairy products continued locally and abroad, and supply ran low.

The May Class III price, which rose by $3.05/cwt from the previous month, was substantially affected by this price increase. Primarily representing the worth of milk used for cheese manufacture, the Class III price is a benchmark for the larger dairy market. This sharp rise emphasizes how sensitive commodity prices are to quick changes in specific sectors, stressing the cheese market’s importance in the national dairy economy. Dairy farmers must balance growing expenses with remaining profitable while meeting changing customer expectations.

The Bottom Line

The surprising surge in fluid milk sales and record-breaking cheese exports within the changing terrain of the U.S. dairy industry contrasts sharply with the continuous drop in milk output. The 0.7 percent rise in milk sales points to a change in consumer behavior, motivated by a fresh enthusiasm for classic dairy products. On the other hand, American cheese’s demand internationally has skyrocketed; 8.7% of output is exported, suggesting great worldwide demand and a possible new income source for home producers.

Adjusting for the leap year, the consistently declining milk output—now at ten straight months of year-over-year decline—showcases important production sector issues probably related to feed price volatility and long-term changes in dairy farming techniques. Reflecting these supply restrictions and shifting market dynamics, the substantial rise in cheese prices fuels a significant increase in the May Class III price.

These entwined tendencies point to both possibilities and challenges for American dairy farmers, implying a tricky balancing act between satisfying home demand, profiting from foreign markets, and negotiating manufacturing efficiency and cost control.

Key Takeaways:

In an evolving landscape marked by shifting consumer preferences and unprecedented export achievements, the U.S. dairy market has experienced stark contrasts in its fluid milk sales, cheese exports, and milk production. Below are the key takeaways from these recent developments: 

  • U.S. fluid milk sales rose by nearly 100 million pounds, or 0.7% on a leap year-adjusted basis, during the first four months of this year.
  • While domestic consumption of most major dairy products decreased, yogurt and non-American types of cheese saw increased domestic demand.
  • A record 8.7% of total U.S. cheese production was exported between February and April, marking an all-time high for this period.
  • April 2023 witnessed a 0.4% decline in U.S. milk production compared to April 2022, continuing a ten-month trend of lower year-on-year production figures.
  • Cheese prices surged in May, driving the May Class III price up by $3.05 per hundredweight from the previous month.

Summary: 

The U.S. dairy industry has experienced a significant increase in fluid milk sales and cheese exports, despite declining milk output. Fluid milk sales jumped by about 100 million pounds in the first four months of the year, while cheese exports reached a record 8.7% of total output from February to April. This unexpected trend can be attributed to changing consumer preferences, global market dynamics, and technological advancements in dairy production. The wider consequences for the dairy industry include shifts in market share and potential economic impacts. Despite these challenges, the U.S. dairy industry is demonstrating remarkable resilience with the rise in fluid milk and cheese exports. This trend holds promising implications for producers and consumers, instilling a sense of hope and optimism in the industry. However, as the dairy industry negotiates these changes, fast rises in cheese prices have significantly raised the Class III price, underlining the market’s reaction. American cheese exports set a new record for the U.S. dairy market, reflecting both opportunities and challenges in the international marketplace. Addressing these entwined problems would help prevent the drop in output and guarantee the resilience and sustainability of the American dairy market against changing consumer tastes and financial uncertainty.

Learn More:

For further insights into this evolving landscape, consider exploring the following articles: 

Send this to a friend