Learn why farmland prices keep going up even with challenges in the dairy industry. Find out how interest rates, inflation, and milk prices affect land value.

The dairy industry is navigating an intricate maze of challenges that every farmer must meticulously heed. The ascension of interest rates and relentless inflation, coupled with erratic commodity and milk prices, constructs a formidable financial landscape. Grasping the trends in appreciating farmland prices is pivotal for dairy farmers. Yet, amidst these operational tribulations, the enduring resilience of farmland prices emerges as a beacon of potential stability. This exploration delves into the reasons underlying the fortitude of farmland values and their profound implications for the dairy sector. Your capacity to adapt and thrive is not just a possibility but a necessity that may hinge on mastering this essential facet.

The Unyielding Ascent of Farmland Values: A Historical Perspective 

The historical trajectory of farmland prices over the past few decades is a testament to its remarkable resilience, often defying economic fluctuations. Even during periods of instability like recessions or spikes in inflation, farmland values have shown a counter-cyclical nature. For instance, farmland prices dipped during the 1980s farm crisis but robustly recovered through the 1990s. By the early 2000s, rising commodity prices and advancements in agricultural technologies spurred new appreciation in farmland values. This trend continued through the 2008 financial crisis when farmland was considered a safer investment than volatile markets. The past decade has further solidified this upward trend with strategic shifts towards larger, productive farms and continuous demand for food and dairy products. Despite numerous headwinds, the agricultural land market has maintained a robust appreciation trajectory, underpinned by the fundamental value of the land itself.

Evaluating the Economic Underpinnings of Farmland Prices 

Understanding the economic underpinnings of farmland prices requires a deep dive into critical principles, with supply and demand dynamics being fundamental. The increasing global need for food production drives demand while the supply of arable land remains limited. This scarcity ensures that farmland values generally trend upward despite economic fluctuations. Given that only a fraction of the earth’s surface is fit for agriculture, farmland carries inherent value. 

Farmland is often seen as a stable investment, particularly during economic uncertainties. Unlike other assets susceptible to volatility, farmland benefits from its tangible nature and essential economic role. Investors appreciate its resilience, as it produces steady income from crops and rental agreements and is less prone to speculative bubbles. This income and capital appreciation combination makes farmland a top choice in diversified investment portfolios.

Navigating the Dairy Industry’s Complex Economic Landscape: An Evolving Challenge for Farmers 

The dairy industry faces many challenges that shape the economic landscape for farmers. Rising operational costs, driven by a 15% increase in farm equipment prices over the past five years, strain profitability. Regulatory pressures continue to mount, often requiring costly compliance measures without financial support. Market volatility further exacerbates the situation, with fluctuating milk prices and unpredictable global milk production trends—such as the 1.4% increase in 2023—adding complexity to financial planning and stability. Historically, small commercial dairy farms have been the industry’s backbone, particularly in states like Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, which accounted for 60% of the country’s small commercial dairy farms in 2017. However, the rise of larger farms—with operations housing at least 5,000 cows increasing dramatically from just 8 in 1992 to 189 by 2017—has shifted industry dynamics. This consolidation creates competitive disadvantages for small and medium-sized farms, which struggle to achieve economies of scale and bear the brunt of market and regulatory pressures more acutely. 

This complex interplay of rising costs, stringent regulations, and market fluctuations inevitably influences farmland prices. As dairy farmers navigate these challenges, the resilience of farmland values offers some financial cushioning. Despite the trials faced by the industry, farmland has generally appreciated, underscoring its role as a vital asset in a farmer’s portfolio.

The Multifaceted Appeal of Farmland as an Investment 

Farmland is a robust investment due to its tangible value and multifaceted utility. Its ability to generate rental income through leasing to farmers offers a reliable revenue stream, making it an attractive option for investors. This multifaceted appeal should instill confidence in the potential of farmland as a sound investment choice.

Maximizing Farmland Investment: Exploring Diverse and Innovative Uses 

While traditional farming remains the primary use for most farmlands, many landowners are now exploring alternative uses to maximize their investments. Diversifying into high-value crops, like organic produce or specialty commodities, can enhance profitability. Integrating agritourism also presents lucrative opportunities by transforming a working farm into a destination for visitors seeking authentic agricultural experiences. This generates additional revenue streams and fosters community engagement and educational outreach. 

Beyond agricultural uses, farmlands are increasingly being repurposed for renewable energy projects. Solar and wind energy installations can significantly augment income, offering stable, long-term leases while contributing to clean energy initiatives. Farmlands near urban areas also often hold potential for residential or commercial development, which can drastically increase land value. This multifaceted potential highlights farmland’s robustness as an investment, providing owners with a versatile portfolio that can adapt to market trends and economic shifts.

Government Policies and Subsidies: Pillars of Farmland Value Stability in the Dairy Industry 

Government policies and subsidies are crucial in maintaining farmland values within the dairy industry. Programs like the USDA’s Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) provide financial support, helping farmers manage volatile milk prices and rising production costs. These safety nets prevent forced land sales and foreclosures, stabilizing farmland prices during economic stress. 

In addition to financial aid, policies that incentivize sustainable practices enhance farmland value. Programs rewarding environmental stewardship boost land’s inherent value and open new revenue streams such as carbon credits or organic certification. These initiatives foster a resilient agricultural sector with stable land values. 

Subsidies for technological advancements and infrastructure improvements increase farm efficiency and productivity. Grants for modern equipment or precision agriculture techniques lead to higher yields and better resource management, enhancing farm profitability and land value. 

Government-backed loans and insurance programs shield dairy farms from economic shifts and natural disasters, reducing the risk of farming operations. This stability fortifies the agricultural real estate market, ensuring farmland remains a sound investment despite industry challenges. 

Government policies and subsidies are pivotal in sustaining and enhancing farmland values. By providing financial stability, encouraging sustainability, fostering technological growth, and mitigating risks, these initiatives ensure that farmland, especially in the dairy industry, continues to appreciate even amid economic uncertainties.

Harnessing Technology and Sustainability: Revolutionizing Farmland Productivity and Value 

Technological advances, like precision farming and sustainable practices, can significantly enhance farmland productivity and intrinsic value. Precision farming uses GPS, IoT devices, and data analytics to meticulously manage crop health and soil conditions meticulously, enabling efficient resource use and optimizing yields. Sustainable practices, such as crop rotation, organic farming, and conservation tillage, improve soil health and meet consumer demand for eco-friendly products. Farmers can boost long-term productivity and marketability by adopting these innovations, contributing to the sustained appreciation of farmland value.

The Bottom Line

As we explore the dynamics affecting farmland values, it’s clear that farmland prices remain resilient despite the challenges in the dairy industry—rising interest rates, inflation, and fluctuating milk prices. Economic fundamentals, investment attractiveness, government policies, and subsidies support this resilience. Technological advancements and sustainable practices are also boosting farmland productivity and value. Scale plays a crucial role in profitability and cost management, with more extensive operations navigating economic pressures more effectively than smaller farms. The enduring appeal of farmland values results from historical trends, economic principles, innovative practices, and strategic governance. While small and midsized dairy farms struggle with financial sustainability, the farmland market remains strong, offering opportunities for investors. Encouraging sustainable and efficient resource use in dairy farming is essential. By adopting innovative technologies and sound financial strategies, the dairy industry can better navigate its complex economic landscape, ensuring that farmland remains a valuable asset. Now is the time to innovate, invest, and advocate for practices that enhance farmlands’ profitability and long-term viability.

Key Takeaways:

• Dairy farmers face numerous economic challenges, including inflation and changing commodity prices, alongside varying milk prices.
• Despite these headwinds, farmland prices have shown remarkable resilience, appreciating in value over time.
• Investing in farmland offers both economic stability and potential for long-term growth, making it a valuable asset for farmers and investors alike.
• Government policies and subsidies play a crucial role in maintaining the value stability of farmland, particularly in the dairy sector.
• Technological advancements and sustainable practices contribute to enhancing farmland productivity and, consequently, its overall value.

Summary:

The dairy industry faces challenges such as rising interest rates, inflation, and erratic commodity and milk prices. Farmland prices have shown resilience due to supply and demand dynamics, with the increasing global need for food production driving demand while the supply of arable land remains limited. Farmland values offer financial cushioning and are a vital asset in a farmer’s portfolio. Diversification into high-value crops, agritourism, renewable energy projects, and residential or commercial development is being explored to maximize investments. Government policies and subsidies are crucial in maintaining farmland values within the dairy industry. Programs like the USDA’s Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) provide financial support to farmers, helping them manage volatile milk prices and rising production costs. Incentives for sustainable practices, such as carbon credits or organic certification, also enhance farmland value. Government-backed loans and insurance programs shield dairy farms from economic shifts and natural disasters, reducing the risk of farming operations. Technological advances, such as precision farming and sustainable practices, can significantly enhance farmland productivity and intrinsic value. Scale plays a crucial role in profitability and cost management, and adopting innovative technologies and sound financial strategies can help the dairy industry navigate its complex economic landscape.

Learn more:

• The Hidden Causes of the Recent Boom in Dairy Farm Production Costs
• Why Milk Costs More but Dairy Farmers Earn Less: The Global Dairy Dilemma
• Why Dairy Prices Haven’t Soared Post-COVID Despite Rising Costs

Well done, co-ops. Your leadership is shaping a better future for dairy.

On Monday, an effort that took more than three years, more than 200 meetings, 49 days of a record-long Federal Order hearing, and countless hours of analysis and discussion were reflected in a recommended USDA plan for Federal Milk Marketing Order modernization that incorporates much of the comprehensive approach to improvements we advocated throughout.

Yes, not every detail is exactly as we would have had it – we always knew that would be the case. And USDA’s plan isn’t set in stone – we take very seriously the comment period we will soon be in and plan a detailed response to this proposal. Our FMMO task force is meeting to discuss the plan next week; even as we speak, our staff and cooperative experts are putting pen to paper to better understand how various parts of the USDA plan will interact to affect dairy farmers and the cooperatives they own, as well as the broader industry.

That’s all to say our work is far from over. But Monday’s decision was arguably the critical milestone in this process. And this industry – led by the member-owners of the nation’s leading dairy cooperatives – has many reasons to be heartened by the improvements USDA has proposed to the nation’s Federal Milk Marketing Order system.

A few notes on what USDA offered, and how it compares to what we’ve advocated.

• On the “higher of” Class I mover. Noting that dairy farmers have lost roughly $1.3 billion in revenue since the mover was changed in 2019, we fought for a return to the higher-of in the name of fairness and real-time market signals. Processors proposed a different formula, citing its importance to risk management, especially for extended shelf-life milk. Recognizing the need to restore orderly milk marketing, USDA decided to go back to the higher-of, with an accommodation for extended shelf-life milk, thus granting NMPF’s request for the vast majority of U.S. fluid milk. USDA’s solution is, frankly, as innovative as it is fair – a classic case of two sides not getting all that everyone wanted, but everyone getting what they most needed.
• On make allowances. USDA’s numbers for an adjustment were higher than what NMPF proposed, though not greatly out of line with our analysis. And USDA denied the processors’ request to automatically increase the numbers over the next three years, which NMPF opposed. Agreement was nearly universal that make allowances, which hadn’t been revised since 2000, needed to change. The next step now will be seeking better plant-cost data through mandatory surveys via legislation, a step that’s been included in every significant congressional farm bill plan that’s been proposed.
• On increasing the Class price skim milk component factors. Again, USDA’s plan takes a direction similar to NMPF’s, though it doesn’t include the automatic update provision we proposed.
• On the Class I differentials. In many cases, USDA’s county-level calculations matched our own. In many others, the calculations deviated minimally. And in a few others, the differences were significant. Meanwhile, USDA denied a processor proposal to zero out the base differential, which would have significantly reduced every differential in the country and set the Class I differentials to zero at some locations in the West. We will be examining USDA’s methodology to better understand its calculations, reflecting the best data and our members’ input.
• On removing barrel cheese from the protein price formula. USDA accepted NMPF’s proposal without modification.

As has always been the case, member leadership is what has made this process work for dairy. The conversation is continuing, and the comprehensive, consensus-driven approach that has been our hallmark will also continue.

Once Monday’s proposal is officially published in the Federal Register, we and other stakeholders will have 60 days to submit comments to USDA. A final producer vote is projected for early 2025. Again, thank you to all the cooperative leadership for what has been accomplished so far, and for the good work for dairy that will continue. And with that, happy Independence Day. We’ll be back next week for the second half of an already successful year.

Learn about the sad story of a New York woman who was killed by a protective cow on a farm in Lisbon. Find out what happened in this tragic incident. Read more.

An unusual and tragic incident took place on a farm in Lisbon, New York, where a cow fatally attacked a woman. While caring for a newborn calf, she was charged and struck by the protective animal. This rare event has led to an investigation by the St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Office, highlighting the unpredictability of working with livestock, even in well-managed environments.

On the day of the incident, Flor Lopez cared for a newborn calf when its mother, an overprotective cow, suddenly charged at her. The cow struck Lopez several times, causing severe injuries. Fellow workers noticed the commotion and rushed to help. 

Emergency responders acted swiftly. After Flor Lopez was struck, coworkers at Flack Farm immediately called for help. Paramedics and local law enforcement arrived quickly, administering first aid and assessing her condition. Understanding the severity, they rushed her to Claxton Hepburn Medical Center in Ogdensburg, New York. Despite their efforts, Lopez succumbed to her injuries shortly upon arrival. The medical team’s determination was evident in their quick actions and attempts to save her life.

The St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Office is thoroughly investigating the tragic incident. They aim to understand what led to Flor Lopez being charged by the cow. An autopsy is scheduled to determine the exact cause of death, helping to clarify the events of that fateful day.

Flack Farm, nestled in the tranquil town of Lisbon, sits about 50 miles from Syracuse and near the picturesque St. Lawrence River, a natural U.S.-Canada border. This region thrives on agriculture, with dairy farming a vital part of the local economy. 

Operations at Flack Farm reflect those of many other dairy farms in the area. They focus on the careful care of cows and calves. Dairy farming demands close attention to animal welfare, ensuring that young and mature cows get proper nutrition, shelter, and healthcare. 

Cows, especially new mothers, exhibit protective solid instincts. It’s common for them to become aggressive if they sense a threat to their calves. Therefore, farmers and workers must exercise caution to avoid tragic incidents involving Flor Lopez.

Working with livestock, especially around protective animals, needs caution and strict safety rules. Farmworkers should stay alert and understand the natural behaviors of these animals. 

Here are some tips to prevent such tragic events: 

• Understand animal behavior: Learn how cows behave, especially after giving birth. Recognizing signs of anger or aggression can help you stay safe.
• Always stay alert: Check your surroundings and watch the animals nearby. Stay aware of possible dangers while focused on tasks like caring for a calf.
• Use protective barriers: When possible, use gates or barriers to separate yourself from the cows. This can offer extra safety.
• Work in pairs: Don’t work alone if you can avoid it. Having a coworker nearby can help quickly in emergencies.
• Move calmly and confidently: Sudden movements can scare animals. Move slowly and steadily to keep things calm.
• Wear appropriate gear: Use proper protective clothing and gear to help prevent injuries.
• Emergency preparedness: Ensure all farmworkers know what to do in emergencies. Being ready can save lives.

These safety tips can make farms safer for everyone, reducing the risk of injuries and protecting people and animals.

Flor Lopez’s death at Flack Farm in Lisbon, N.Y., occurred after she was repeatedly struck by a cow while tending to a newborn calf. The St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Office is investigating, and an autopsy will determine the exact cause of death. Our condolences to her family and friends during this challenging time. 

This tragedy highlights the risks in agricultural work and stresses the need for better safety measures to protect those in the field.

Summary: Flor Lopez, a dairy farm worker, was fatally attacked by a cow while caring for a newborn calf on Flack Farm in Lisbon, New York. The incident has sparked an investigation by the St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Office, highlighting the unpredictable nature of working with livestock. Lopez was struck multiple times by the protective cow, causing severe injuries. Emergency responders and local law enforcement arrived quickly, administering first aid and assessing her condition. Lopez was rushed to Claxton Hepburn Medical Center in Ogdensburg, where she died shortly after. The St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the incident and aims to understand the cause of Lopez’s charge. An autopsy is scheduled to determine the exact cause of death. Farmworkers should stay alert and understand the natural behaviors of protective animals to prevent such tragic events. Safety tips include understanding animal behavior, using protective barriers, working in pairs, moving calmly and confidently, wearing appropriate gear, and being emergency prepared.

Explore how the H5N1 outbreak in US dairy sheds light on public health readiness for future pandemics. Are we prepared enough? Find out more.

In just about a month, we’ve seen the unexpected yet significant shift in America’s public health landscape. The H5N1 avian flu, formerly an abstract cause of concern isolated to flocks of birds, has found a comfortable nesting ground in U.S. dairy cows. The discovery which began as a surprise medical finding soon escalated into a food security scare, rapidly mushrooming into a potential pandemic nightmare. If we are fortunate enough to sidestep more human cases, the scare, nonetheless, verges on crippling a vital sector of the American food industry. 

“The H5N1 scare threatens to paralyze a crucial segment of American food resources and reopen political wounds that are yet to heal since the onslaught of the Covid-19.”

Experts emphasize that the renewed strain on public health resurfaces political battles and rekindles debates left smoldering in the wake of Covid-19. Join us as we delve deeper into understanding the implications of this fresh scare and what it portrays about American public health readiness.

Surprise Outbreak 

The emergence of this unexpected outbreak took everyone by surprise. Dairy cows across northern Texas and Kansas started falling ill without any apparent cause. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, faced with this looming public health threat, tirelessly worked through a laundry list of potential diseases before they were able to confirm the culprit – H5N1. 

On March 25th, amidst growing concerns and rising fears, the official announcement was made. The first human case appeared shortly after in a dairy worker who presented with pink eye; a frightening signal of potential zoonotic transmission, yet thankfully without any severe symptoms. 

In the initial, uncertain weeks of the outbreak, there was an intriguing pattern observed: Dairy operations reporting sick cows in North Texas also reported sick workers. This leads to an intriguing question: Could there be a correlation? Exploring this possible connection could help us better understand how the virus spreads and adapt our containment strategies accordingly.

Widespread Infections and Testing

In the thick of the fight against an outbreak, the USDA had confirmed by the end of April, 36 herds across nine stateswere identified as positive for H5N1. The experts in the field, our dedicated medical professionals, pointed towards an interesting mode of transmission – through milk. Intriguingly, in numerous cases, the virus was found residing in the udders of infected cows. But there’s a silver lining: The majority of the cows recovered swiftly and, thanks to foresight and strict measures, their milk never made it to the market. 

Sadly, these preventative measures didn’t protect everyone. Six furry feline friends, fed milk from these infected cows, contracted H5N1. The virus was ruthless, leading to significant organ damage in these cats and resulting in the tragic loss of three lives. This incident opens up another window of study – understanding the cross-species transmission of the virus. As a warning sign of the potential severity of this situation, the USDA preprint in May 2021 stated, “Continued transmission of H5N1 HPAI (highly pathogenic avian influenza) within dairy cattle increases the risk for infection and subsequent spread of the virus to human populations.” 

A saying goes, “Prevention is better than cure”. The same holds for managing pandemics. These patterns suggest that we need to take a proactive approach and test widely, not just within the human population, but also consider potential cross-species transmission points.

The Problem – Bigger Than You Think 

It is time for us to turn our attention to a significant issue that is brewing in the U.S dairy food industry. To grasp the gravity of this situation, note the data provided by DairyNews which states that the U.S dairy market was worth a whopping $55.5 billion in 2023, with projections of growth to approximately $73.03 billion by 2033. 

Now, imagine for a moment what would occur if such a vital industry were to be struck by an uncontrolled pandemic. The consequences would be catastrophic, more so when considering the aftershocks from the economic fallout caused by COVID-19. Hence, the thought of being the source of another potential pandemic is intimidating, if not terrifying. 

This fear, however, is putting an uncomfortable spotlight on the reluctance, or even outright resistance, of dairy producers and their workers towards testing. This isn’t simply a case of individuals being too scared to face reality, but rather an industry-wide issue that, if not addressed, could lead to detrimental results.

If You Don’t Test, You Don’t Flunk 

At first glance, refusing testing may appear as an attractive option for dairy producers and their workers, particularly if it’s about dodging the perils of unmasking potential pandemic situations. A noteworthy portion of this workforce, predominantly undocumented immigrants hailing from Latin American countries, navigate through a unique dilemma: Uncover a probable illness and stand a chance of deportation or maintain silence while the disease spreads. 

However, we must bear in mind that refusing to confront the truth doesn’t insulate us from the repercussions of a future outbreak. The ramifications are widespread, inflicting everyone engaged in the industry. To echo a famous saying, “you can evade reality, but you cannot shirk the fallout of sidestepping reality.” 

An apt comparison has been made in a recent editorial piece in the Bovine Veterinarian, where a veterinarian is quoted as saying: “You know, we can’t cross over it. We can’t circumvent it. We can’t burrow under it. We have to face it… Let’s not hide.” This poignant statement powerfully encapsulates why embracing testing, rather than fleeing from it, is our best defensive strategy against ongoing and impending public health crises.

Lessons from H5N1 in US Dairy for Future Pandemics 

One significant takeaway from the H5N1 outbreak in US dairy farms is the urgent need for robust and proactive measures. Our approach must prioritize the timely detection of infections through comprehensive testing procedures across populations vulnerable to these exogenous health threats. As Braithwaite et al.’s study stresses, implementing early stringent public health interventions such as thorough testing and tracing measures are vital elements in containing virus spreading. 

Secondly, a remarkable lesson is how crucial the public’s comprehension of these threats becomes. The intricacies of pandemic management aren’t just matters for the experts in white lab-coats – they’re inextricably tied to the daily lives of everyone. The ‘invisibility’ of a virus does not negate its grave impacts. Echoing the survey results from Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC) countries, the lack of public awareness was a significant challenge in the COVID-19 response. Hence, public education programs and effective risk communication hold paramount importance in bolstering society’s defense against future pandemics. 

Last, but by no means least, the H5N1 outbreak underscores the sheer importance of a well-equipped and fortified health infrastructure. When caught in the throes of a pandemic, the importance of readily available and appropriate personal protective equipment can’t be emphasized enough. 71.1% of healthcare professionals in ITEC countries reported this as a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

As we ruminate on these insights from the H5N1 outbreak, it’s clear that it’s not just about preparing for the next pandemic – it’s about creating a health-conscious society that’s ready to adapt and respond effectively, even when faced with the most daunting public health challenges.

Risk Communication: The Way Forward 

Both Canada and the United States now find themselves in a crucial phase with a window of opportunity swinging wide open: the chance to drastically improve risk communication. This fundamental strategy was, unfortunately, terribly mishandled in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it’s never too late to learn from past mistakes. This offers us a clear pathway to a better defence against not just H5N1, but whatever virus triggers the next inevitable pandemic in our future. 

The key lies in explaining H5N1 transparently, candidly and succinctly, in terms every citizen can grasp. By doing this, we empower people to make informed decisions and take steps to reduce their risk of infection. Not only does this safeguard individual health, but also the community’s as a whole. 

To communicate persuasively and effectively, it’s time for an unprecedented act; politicians and public health officials must come forward and admit to the communication missteps made since the appearance of COVID-19. While it may seem like a challenging confession to make, recognizing and dealing forthrightly with previous errors can put us ahead of H5N1 and future health threats. Acknowledging past failures is not a sign of weakness but rather a reflection of resilience, adaptability, and commitment to safeguarding public health.

The Bottom Line

Unraveling the implications of the H5N1 outbreak in US dairy is not merely an exercise in retrospection. It’s a call to action for revamping our public health systems. By learning from past shortcomings and leveraging data-driven insights, we can fortify our preparedness for the inevitable future pandemics. Prioritizing broad-based testing, implementing localized measures, and integrating timely scientific research into practice are key. Remember, health crises require humility, adaptability, and relentless effort. This collective responsibility towards our health and well-being can help us transcend the boundaries of the unpredictable and secure a healthier future for us all. 

Summary: The H5N1 avian flu has reportedly found a home in U.S. dairy cows, leading to a food security scare and potentially a pandemic nightmare. The outbreak began when dairy cows in northern Texas and Kansas started falling ill without any apparent cause. The first human case appeared shortly after, a dairy worker who presented with pink eye, a frightening signal of potential zoonotic transmission, yet thankfully without severe symptoms. The USDA confirmed by the end of April that 36 herds across nine states were identified as positive for H5N1. The virus was found residing in the udders of infected cows in numerous cases. However, most cows recovered swiftly, and their milk never made it to the market. Six furry feline friends, fed milk from these infected cows, contracted H5N1, leading to significant organ damage in these cats and the tragic loss of three lives. The U.S dairy food industry, worth $55.5 billion in 2023 and projected to grow to approximately $73.03 billion by 2033, faces a significant issue if uncontrolled. The outbreak has highlighted the urgent need for robust and proactive measures to prevent future public health crises. Risk communication is a fundamental strategy that can be drastically improved by both Canada and the United States. Unraveling the implications of the H5N1 outbreak in US dairy is not just an exercise in retrospection; it’s a call to action for revamping public health systems.

Discover the shocking truth as Australians rally to reclaim a beloved dairy farm from a controversial Chinese owner. What really happened after the takeover?

There’s a rallying cry reverberating across Australia, a homegrown movement driven by an unwavering purpose: to reassert national control over the historic Woolnorth, a 200-year-old dairy farm symbolizing Australia’s rich agricultural heritage, cradled amidst the raw beauty of northwest Tasmania. Currently, this beloved icon finds itself in the possession of Chinese billionaire Xianfeng Lu, who has opened the property up for global bidding. But the unwavering Aussie spirit rises to the challenge; bolstered by a wave of national pride and an unshakeable resolve, Australians stand steadfast in the face of international competition, pledging to bring Woolnorth back home.  

More than sheer acreage and livestock, Woolnorth is a living testament to time, echoing the ebb and flow of Australia’s farming history. The property showcases more than its storied past; it invites you into an elegant homestead resting amidst eight bustling dairies and a wind farm caressed by the Tasmanian breeze. Woolnorth had once worn the mantle of ‘Australia’s Most Productive Dairy Farm,’ a title that locals steadfastly believe it can – and should – reclaim. 

The Call to Action 

When the campaign to buy back Woolnorth began, Australia responded with an overwhelming wave of support. Australia’s page on Facebook quickly became a beacon for this patriotic cause, drawing in a remarkable 6,000 expressions of interest in just 32 hours. The collective strength and determination of the Australian people was evident in this momentous response. 

Looking at Woolnorth, it isn’t hard to see why so many were captivated by this campaign. Nestled on some of Tasmania’s most awe-inspiring coastline, the farm is a demonstration of natural beauty and agricultural prowess. The estate comes complete with 30 homes, a 13-stand shearing shed that tells a rich farming history, two extensive cattle yards that bear testament to its impressive scale, and countless farm and livestock sheds that hint at its inherent potential. 

Proclaiming Woolnorth’s air to be the ‘cleanest in the world,’ a captivating promotional video was part of the sales package. This extravagant claim resonated with many Australians who believe in Tasmania’s unique, unpolluted charm—the crystalline air, the clear skies, and the abundant wildlife. This quality of life, reminiscent of a bygone era, seemed to call out to potential investors, urging them to consider the restoration and preservation of this iconic farm.

Previous Attempts 

In recent history, there have been instances where Australians passionately rallied together to reclaim iconic Australian land from, not just Chinese, but foreign ownership at large. One notable event that still resonates with many is the audacious bid to crowdfund the return of the Kidman property. This property held the title of being the largest terrestrial landholding globally at the time. 

The massive show of support, unfortunately, did not pan out as would have been the ideal scenario for most Aussies. The Kidman station was eventually snapped up by Western Australian mining billionaire, Gina Rinehart, who collaborated with a small Chinese firm for the purchase. 

James Bennett, a zealous advocate for Australian ownership of economic assets, is the brain behind the Australia’s Page campaign. He staunchly asserts that several other nations implement structures that prevent their property from being sold abroad. This perspective essentially underlines the urgency of restricting key resources within the confines of local ownership.

The Repercussions of Foreign Ownership 

Woolnorth, an iconic piece of Tasmanian territory, was bought by businessman Lu Jianxiang from China in the not-so-distant past. This acquisition got the green light from the Foreign Investment Review Board, but the approval came with some prerequisites. Expectations were set for Lu to generate job opportunities, stimulate infrastructural growth and undertake environment-conscious endeavors. 

Unfortunately, these aspirations fell short. Critics argue that the businessman has not fulfilled the commitments he obligated himself to. The situation triggered major upheavals within Woolnorth’s directorial ranks, with as many as five directors stepping down during 2018 due to the emerging issues. This compelling case highlights the potential repercussions when overseas entities gain control of key domestic resources, creating challenging dynamics and sparking a wider – and needed – conversation about national asset ownership.

The Downfall of Woolnorth

Xianfeng Lu, the controversial owner, had ambitious plans to radically alter Tasmania’s milk industry. His original vision was to transport millions of liters of fresh Tasmanian milk to the bustling metropolises of Ningbo, Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Beijing under his brand, Van Dairy. Lu envisioned countless Chinese consumers enjoying wholesome, quality Tasmanian milk – something that was to become an integral part of his business strategy.

Unfortunately, this grand plan did not materialize. When the aspiration to fly milk directly to Chinese consumers fell through, already-existing business arrangements started to crumble.

One of these arrangements was a crucial contract with New Zealand dairy co-operative Fonterra. This pivotal deal, designed to support Lu’s original vision, abruptly ended in February. Its termination signaled not just a setback for Lu’s dream, but a devastating blow to the farm itself.

Tragically, the cessation of the Fonterra contract led to the severe reduction of the dairy herd. Over 700 milking cows, once seen as living, breathing symbols of Lu’s ambition, met an unfortunate end.

The death of these cows and the failed Fonterra contract was, indeed, symbolic. The once-thriving Woolnorth dairy operation had reached a critical point. The inevitable occurred – a ‘for sale’ sign was hoisted as a stark reminder of unfulfilled visions and unmet commitments.

Allegations and Compliance Issues: A Yawning Gap in Animal Welfare

In the dirty underbelly of dairy farming, the story of Woolnorth took a disturbing turn in 2019 when staff raised allegations of inhumane treatment of animals. The accusations didn’t exist in isolation. They were a grim reflection of a systemic issue that had allowed the welfare of dairy cows to take a backseat, resulting in many being left to languish and die in effluent. Problems went beyond disease-ridden cattle showing symptoms of mastitis. They pointed to a fundamental breakdown in their care, with instances of cattle going without feed for days and struggling due to an insufficient supply of water. 

Audits Uncover An Ugly Truth 

Worse still, these on-the-ground realities were betraying the trust of consumers and shaking industry standards. In 2021, the environmental protection agency conducted audits and uncovered a failure rate as high as 83%. This was not merely a case of meeting the dairy premises effluent management code of practice; it was about not complying with it across 23 farms owned by the company. 

High-Profile Support for Reclaiming Australian Dairy 

As concerns mounted, a wave of support swept across Australia to reclaim the dairy farm from foreign ownership. High-profile Australians, not the least of whom was entrepreneur Dick Smith, rallied for returning the stewardship of the farm and its thousands of cows back to Australian hands. Their collective action reflected a larger concern about the state of Australian ownership and a desire to right the moral compass.

The State of Australian Farm Ownership 

The picture of Australian farming is changing rapidly. As per the latest figures shared by the Foreign Investment Review Board, foreign ownership accounts for 12.3% of farmland – a total of 47.71 million hectares – in Australia. Importantly, this marks the lowest level of foreign ownership seen in the farming sector over the last seven years. 

Stephen Fisher, Director of the Circular Head Farming Group, has provided a practical solution to this situation. Fisher strongly advocates for the use of Australian funds to invest in the acquisition of farms. He believes that these farms should then be occupied and managed by capable Australian farmers. Fisher’s goal is not simply to reduce foreign ownership, but to provide a stepping stone for young people eager to delve into the farming industry. 

The successful implementation of Fisher’s approach can be seen with Circular Farms. This initiative has so far secured dairy farms for twelve couples, providing them not only with a livelihood but also the fulfilment of their dream to farm. Through Fisher’s belief in harnessing local resources and empowering young Australians, Circular Farms is creating a meaningful change and preserving the integrity of Australian farming.

The Bottom Line

As we delve deeper into the heart of this sensitive matter, the implications become glaringly evident. This isn’t just about a dairy farm acquisition or single instances of malpractice; it’s a manifestation of broader issues of land use, global investments, and accountability. We are reminded of the beauty of localisation in the dairy industry and the irreplaceable value it presents to the community and the economy. What we’re witnessing is an urgent call for a coherent national strategy on farm ownership, decisive action on compliance issues, and a collective effort to preserve our treasured farmlands. Whether it’s about views of rolling pastures, fresh local milk, or maintaining Australia’s dairy farming heritage, the underlying message remains clear: it’s high time we protect, respect, and, if need be, reclaim our ground.

Summary: Australia is a nation-wide movement to reclaim the historic Woolnorth dairy farm, currently under Chinese billionaire Xianfeng Lu. The farm, located in northwest Tasmania, is a symbol of national pride and boasts 30 homes, a 13-stand shearing shed, two cattle yards, and numerous farm and livestock sheds. Woolnorth was once Australia’s most productive dairy farm, and locals believe it can proudly hold this title again. Previous attempts to reclaim iconic Australian land from foreign ownership have been unsuccessful, such as the crowdfunding bid for the Kidman property. However, the Kidman station was eventually bought by Western Australian mining billionaire Gina Rinehart, who collaborated with a small Chinese firm for the purchase. James Bennett, a zealous advocate for Australian ownership of economic assets, is the brain behind the Australia’s Page campaign. The repercussions of foreign ownership are significant. Woolnorth was bought by businessman Lu Jianxiang from China in the past, with expectations set for him to generate job opportunities, stimulate infrastructural growth, and undertake environment-conscious endeavors. Critics argue that Lu has not fulfilled these commitments, leading to major upheavals within Woolnorth’s directorial ranks. A wave of support swept across Australia to reclaim the dairy farm from foreign ownership, reflecting a larger concern about the state of Australian ownership and a desire to right the moral compass.

Discover how Vermont’s dairy farms are revolutionizing their income with community solar. Could this be the new cash crop? Dive in to find out more.

Vermont, a state iconic for its rolling green hills dappled with dairy cows, rakes in an annual revenue exceeding $2.2 billion solely from its dairy industry. However, with profit margins in agriculture wearing increasingly thin, local farmers have found the need to compete, ensuring optimal use of their land without any losses. Enter the era of greener, financial pastures with a community solar subscription.

Thanks to two recently finished off-site community solar projects, developed and constructed by Norwich Solar, and financed by strategic partners, Solaris Energy and GreenDay Finance, over 2,100 kWh of renewable energy is slated to be provided annually to six locally run dairy farms. These projects entail two 500 kWac (864 kWdc) solar ground-mount sites that have been built on less productive land within Newbury and Jamaica. 

“It’s a beautiful thing to see locals come together to care for a community resource, especially one that helps their fellow neighbors and local economy. It really hits the mark on what community scale solar is all about,” shared Nick Francis, Solaris Energy’s Director of Project Development.

The science behind it is revolutionary – each solar array has been skillfully designed to reduce fixed energy costs, thus, increasing profit margins. This ingenious move guarantees that Vermont’s dairy farms can continue contributing to the regional economy on a long-term basis. Credit: Solaris Energy 

In the heart of the neighborhood of Jamaica, a site that was once a gravel pit now houses one of these transformative projects which sparked great interest and excitement among local residents, reports Solaris Energy. Meanwhile in Newbury, the project found its home on a hillside which had been previously logged. 

Reflecting the spirit and essence of community-scale solar, a wholesome partnership has made these projects a reality. Certified B Corp, Norwich Solar helmed the projects in both their early development stages and construction of the sites. 

“We are very fortunate to work with engaged property owners to site these solar projects on underused land, enabling additional value to be unlocked for them,” said Kevin Davis, VP of Sales and Marketing for Norwich Solar.

Support from fellow B Corp, Solaris Energy in the form of late-stage development and capital for the final completion of the projects was instrumental. Investor partner, GreenDay Finance took over long-term ownership, and will continue to collaborate with Solaris Energy and Norwich Solar for asset management, operations, and maintenance services on both sites.

Summary: Vermont, known for its dairy industry, is aiming to provide over 2,100 kWh of renewable energy annually to six locally run dairy farms through two off-site community solar projects. Norwich Solar developed and constructed these projects, which are financed by strategic partners Solaris Energy and GreenDay Finance. The solar arrays are skillfully designed to reduce fixed energy costs, increasing profit margins, ensuring that Vermont’s dairy farms can continue contributing to the regional economy on a long-term basis. The projects are located on less productive land in Newbury and Jamaica, with one project in Jamaica, which was once a gravel pit, now housing a solar array. Norwich Solar, a certified B Corp, helmed the projects in both their early development stages and construction of the sites. Solaris Energy provided support in the form of late-stage development and capital for the final completion of the projects. Investor partner GreenDay Finance took over long-term ownership and will continue to collaborate with Solaris Energy and Norwich Solar for asset management, operations, and maintenance services on both sites. This innovative approach to community-scale solar ensures that Vermont’s dairy farms can continue contributing to the regional economy on a long-term basis.