April 2025 genetic reset proves TPI costs $486/cow. Feed Saved varies 900 lbs/lactation. Are you breeding for profit or pretty cows?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The April 2025 genetic base change just shattered every assumption about Holstein breeding – and most producers are missing the $486 per cow profit opportunity hiding in plain sight. While PTAs dropped 650 pounds milk and 38 pounds fat overnight, this wasn’t genetic decline – it was proof of unprecedented advancement that’s making traditional TPI selection obsolete. Net Merit 2025 now predicts $486 more lifetime profit per cow than TPI, driven by butterfat emphasis jumping to 31.8% and Feed Saved evaluations ranging from -782 to +900 pounds per lactation. Research confirms every 1% increase in inbreeding costs 94.5 kg lifetime milk yield, while automated milking systems prove comparable economic performance to conventional parlors across 150-240 cow operations. Component-focused breeding aligns with market realities where butterfat commands $3.06/pound premiums and cheese manufacturing claims 90% of milk utilization. The evidence is overwhelming: producers clinging to conformation-heavy TPI are systematically breeding away from profitability while component-focused herds capture premium value in today’s market.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

• Feed Efficiency Goldmine: Top bulls deliver 900-pound feed savings per lactation through Feed Saved genetics with 14% heritability – translating to measurable cost reductions for operations targeting efficiency over volume production.
• Component Premium Capture: Net Merit 2025’s 31.8% butterfat weighting reflects real market premiums of $3.06/pound, positioning component-focused herds to capture significantly higher milk checks than volume-driven operations.
• Technology ROI Validation: Australian AMS research proves comparable economic performance to conventional systems while milking 150-240 cows with 3-4 robotic units, freeing labor for high-value management tasks and achieving 19.3-26.3 kg daily production per cow.
• Genetic Base Reality Check: The 650-pound milk PTA reduction represents genetic advancement, not decline – operations still using pre-2025 benchmarks are systematically undervaluing elite genetics and missing selection opportunities.
• Inbreeding Cost Documentation: University research confirms every 1% inbreeding increase costs 94.5 kg lifetime milk yield plus extended calving intervals, making diverse genetic sourcing essential for maintaining production efficiency and reproductive performance.

Are you still clinging to the “tall, pretty, high-volume” cow as your gold standard? It’s time to face the facts: the April 2025 genetic base change exposed conventional wisdom as a profit killer, not a profit driver.

The Pain Point: The Numbers Don’t Lie – But They Do Change

Let’s get real. The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding’s (CDCB) April 2025 genetic base adjustment delivered significant changes, with Holstein PTAs dropping 650 lbs of milk, 38 lbs of fat, and 26 lbs of protein overnight – changes that were actually smaller than initially projected but still substantial. If you’re still benchmarking against pre-2025 numbers, you’re comparing apples to oranges – and leaving money on the table.

According to USDA’s May 2025 supply and demand report, U.S. milk production is projected at 227.3 billion pounds for 2025, with the all-milk price increased to $21.60 per hundredweight. But here’s the kicker: profitability is no longer about who ships the most milk but who ships the most value per cow.

Challenging a Sacred Cow: Is TPI Still Relevant for Commercial Profitability?

The Total Performance Index (TPI) has been the industry’s beauty contest for decades, rewarding conformation and stature. However, the latest data shows that TPI’s 26% conformation weighting is out of step with today’s economic realities. Net Merit (NM$) 2025 now predicts $486 more lifetime profit per cow than TPI – a gap confirmed by CDCB research.

The 2025 Net Merit revision reflects “enhanced commitment to dairy cattle genetic improvement and profitability through feed efficiency, component-based milk pricing, and fertility.” The formula puts 31.8% weight on butterfat and doubled emphasis on cow livability to 8.0%, reflecting what actually drives your milk check in today’s component-based markets.

Why does this matter? Because every dollar you spend chasing TPI points is a dollar not invested in traits that pay the bills, like butterfat, feed efficiency, and cow longevity.

The Feed Efficiency Revolution: Hard Numbers on Profit Impact

Let’s talk feed. Feed accounts for over half of total dairy costs, so the Feed Saved trait delivers measurable results. In December 2020, “514,021 Holstein bulls received evaluations for Feed Saved, ranging from -782 to +900,” meaning daughters of the top bulls “are expected to consume 900 pounds less feed per lactation while maintaining similar production.”

Feed Saved has “a heritability of approximately 14%, which falls midrange relative to other traits,” according to the research. While reliability is currently lower than established traits – bulls averaging 30% reliability – the genetic potential is substantial.

Imagine two trucks hauling the same load – one gets 15 MPG, the other 12 MPG. Over a 100,000-mile lifespan, the efficient truck saves $2,500 in fuel. Now scale that to your herd: genetic efficiency measured through Feed Saved represents the difference between breaking even and banking profit.

Inbreeding: The Silent Profit Killer with Documented Losses

Here’s the controversial truth backed by research: Holstein inbreeding effects are measurable and costly. University of Wisconsin research documents that “for each 1% increase in inbreeding, lifetime total milk yield decreased by 94.5 kg, lifetime total fat yield decreased by 3.3 kg, and lifetime total protein yield decreased by 2.9 kg.”

The reproductive impacts are equally concerning: research shows “a 0.7-d increase in calving interval and a 0.3% decrease in survival to second lactation per 1% increase in inbreeding.” USDA scientist Paul Cole explains that “when inbreeding levels rise, we’re more likely to pair two undesirable copies of a gene in the same location,” affecting fertility, longevity, and disease resistance.

Economic impact is measurable: With documented production losses and extended calving intervals, every percentage point of inbreeding represents significant lifetime profit reduction through both decreased output and increased replacement costs.

Technology in Action: Precision Genetics and Automation Delivering Results

The genetic changes aren’t happening in isolation – they’re accelerated by technology adoption proving its worth globally. NSW Department of Primary Industries research confirms that automated milking systems “deliver comparable performance to conventional systems.”

Key AMS findings from Australia:

• Farms typically milk 150-240 cows with 3-4 robotic units
• Daily milk production per cow ranges from 19.3 to 26.3 kilograms
• Cows are milked an average of 2.17 times per day
• Each robot harvests approximately 1,200 kg of milk daily

The research reveals that “AMS is beneficial for freeing up labour for other key tasks such as pasture management, boosting overall farm productivity.” This labor reallocation enables farmers to focus on “farm business management, herd health, and pasture management, enhancing overall farm efficiency and sustainability.”

The Global Market Reality: Components Command the Premium

Market analysis confirms that “butterfat will lead the way for the third straight year in multiple component pricing markets, which price over 90% of the nation’s milk.” In November 2024, “butterfat brought $3.06 per pound and protein was $2.32.”

Global market trends support component focus:

• International butter and cheese prices are stronger than U.S. levels
• Fonterra lifted the 2024-2025 milk price forecast to $10 midpoint per kilogram of milk solids
• U.S. dairy consumption reached 661 pounds per capita in 2023
• Cheese consumption hit a record 40.5 pounds per person

With USDA forecasting the 2025 all-milk price at $21.60 per cwt, component-focused herds are positioned to capture premium value as cheese manufacturing continues dominating milk utilization.

Why This Matters for Your Operation

• Verified Genetic Progress: The April 2025 base change confirms substantial genetic advancement, with CDCB calculations showing “a 0.992 correlation between the April 2025 and current formulas, indicating little reranking expected for most animals.”
• Feed Efficiency Impact: Top bulls can save 900 pounds of feed per lactation while maintaining production levels
• Technology Advantage: AMS systems prove comparable economic performance while freeing labor for value-added management tasks
• Market Alignment: Component emphasis in NM$ 2025 reflects real market premiums driving profitability

Implementation Timeline and Practical Steps

• Feed Efficiency Focus: Target bulls with positive Feed Saved evaluations, recognizing the 14% heritability enables genetic progress
• Component Selection: Leverage the 31.8% butterfat emphasis in NM$ 2025 to capture market premiums
• Technology Integration: Consider AMS adoption where labor flexibility and management focus provide competitive advantages

Barriers and Solutions

• Inbreeding Management: Use diverse genetic sources and monitor Expected Future Inbreeding levels, given documented production losses per percentage point increase
• Technology Adoption: AMS research shows “over 50,000 systems now in use worldwide” with Australia implementing on “around 1.5% of dairy farms, with growing interest”
• Market Adaptation: Align breeding programs with component-focused payment systems that price over 90% of national milk production

Rhetorical Reality Checks

• Are you still benchmarking your herd’s genetic progress against pre-2025 standards when CDCB confirms the largest genetic advancement in recent history?
• How many of your breeding decisions account for the documented $3.06/pound butterfat premiums driving component-focused markets?
• Is your operation positioned to capture the labor flexibility advantages that AMS research proves comparable to conventional systems?

The Bottom Line: What the Verified Data Proves

The 2025 genetic base change confirms unprecedented genetic progress, with PTAs dropping 650 pounds of milk, 38 pounds of fat, and 26 pounds of protein – yet these reductions were smaller than expected, indicating even greater genetic advancement than initially projected.

The economics are clear: Net Merit 2025 predicts $486 more lifetime profit per cow than TPI, while Feed Saved evaluations ranging from -782 to +900 pounds per lactation represent tangible feed cost differences. Component-focused breeding aligns with market realities where butterfat commands $3.06/pound premiums.

Your next steps – backed by verified research:

1. Recalibrate benchmarks using the April 2025 genetic base, recognizing that apparent PTA reductions reflect genetic progress, not losses
2. Prioritize Feed Saved genetics with their documented 14% heritability and 900-pound feed savings potential
3. Leverage component emphasis as NM$ 2025’s 31.8% butterfat weighting reflects real market premiums
4. Evaluate AMS technology where research proves comparable economic performance with enhanced labor flexibility
5. Monitor inbreeding levels given documented production losses of 94.5 kg of milk per 1% increase

Ready to capitalize on genetic advancement? The data confirms that strategic breeding delivers measurable results, component markets reward focused genetics, and technology adoption provides competitive advantages. The only question: will you lead with evidence-based breeding strategies or lag using outdated benchmarks?

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

• 2025 Dairy Market Reality Check: Why Everything You Think You Know About This Year’s Outlook is Wrong – Reveals how component premiums and market dynamics are reshaping profitability calculations, providing strategic context for why genetic selection must align with evolving economic realities.
• The Future of Dairy Farming: Embracing Automation, AI, and Sustainability in 2025 – Demonstrates how emerging technologies like computer vision and automated systems complement genetic advances, showing practical implementation strategies for integrating innovation with breeding decisions.
• Impact of Implementing Female Genomic Selection and the Use of Sex-Selected Semen Technology on Genetic Gain in a Dairy Herd in New Zealand – Documents real-world results from a 1,800-cow operation achieving NZD $72.96 annual genetic gain per animal, proving the financial impact of strategic genomic selection combined with sexed semen technology.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.