meta Unpacking Bias in Genomic Predictions for Dairy Cattle: Challenges and Solutions :: The Bullvine - The Dairy Information You Want To Know When You Need It

Unpacking Bias in Genomic Predictions for Dairy Cattle: Challenges and Solutions

Genomic predictions have revolutionized the dairy cattle industry by allowing for more accurate selection of breeding candidates and faster genetic progress. These predictions leverage genomic information, such as DNA markers, to estimate an animal’s genetic potential for various traits, such as milk production, fertility, and disease resistance. However, like any predictive model, genomic predictions for dairy cattle are susceptible to biases that can impact their reliability and effectiveness. In this article, we delve into the specific challenges and potential solutions related to bias in genomic predictions for dairy cattle.

Sources of Bias in Genomic Predictions for Dairy Cattle

  1. Population Structure: Dairy cattle populations often exhibit complex genetic structures due to differences in breeds, lines, and geographical regions. When genomic prediction models are trained on data that does not adequately represent the target population, it can lead to bias. For instance, if a model is primarily developed using data from Holstein cattle and applied to Jersey cattle, it may produce biased predictions.
  2. Marker Density and Quality: The quality and density of the genetic markers used in genomic predictions can introduce bias. Missing or erroneous marker data, as well as variations in genotyping platforms, can affect the accuracy of predictions.
  3. Selective Breeding: In dairy cattle breeding, elite animals are often selected for reproduction based on their superior traits. If the training dataset primarily comprises these elite individuals, it may not accurately represent the broader population, leading to biased predictions.
  4. Environmental Effects: Genomic prediction models typically assume that genetic effects are consistent across different environments. However, variations in management practices, nutrition, and climate can lead to genotype-environment interactions, resulting in biased predictions when cattle are transferred to different environments.
  5. Sex-Biased Data: In some cases, data collection may be skewed towards one sex, such as focusing predominantly on cows while neglecting bulls. This sex bias can influence predictions for traits that exhibit sexual dimorphism.

Genetic trends of body or structural traits and dairy form for Holstein bulls. STA = standardized PTA; GPTA14 = genomic PTA in 2014; GPTA18 = genomic PTA in 2018; YOB = year of birth.

Mitigating Bias in Genomic Predictions for Dairy Cattle

Addressing bias in genomic predictions for dairy cattle is crucial for improving the accuracy of breeding decisions. Here are some strategies to mitigate bias:

  1. Account for Population Structure: Employ statistical methods that account for population structure, such as principal component analysis (PCA) or genomic relationship matrices. These methods can correct for genetic stratification and reduce bias.
  2. Marker Quality Control: Implement strict quality control measures to filter out low-quality markers and correct for genotyping errors. Consistency in marker data quality across datasets is essential.
  3. Diverse Training Data: Aim to include a diverse set of animals in the training dataset, representing various breeds, lines, and geographical regions. This diversity can help improve prediction accuracy for a broader range of cattle.
  4. Crossbred Animals: When possible, include crossbred animals in the training dataset to account for genetic differences between purebred populations. Crossbred animals can provide valuable information about heterosis and breed complementarity.
  5. Environment-Specific Models: Develop environment-specific prediction models when relevant. Accounting for genotype-environment interactions can improve the accuracy of predictions when animals are moved to different management or climate conditions.

Genomic predictions have reshaped the dairy cattle industry by enhancing breeding decisions and genetic progress. However, the bias in these predictions remains a significant challenge. Dairy cattle breeders and researchers must be vigilant in addressing bias by considering population structure, marker quality, and environmental effects. By implementing these strategies, the dairy industry can harness the full potential of genomic predictions to enhance the genetic merit of their cattle, ultimately leading to improved productivity and sustainability.

Send this to a friend