Stop believing government programs are “fair game.” Wisconsin lawsuit exposes $15,000+ EQIP disparities threatening your operation’s constitutional rights.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The dairy industry’s comfortable reliance on USDA programs is about to face its biggest constitutional challenge since the New Deal, potentially costing operations thousands in lost competitive advantages. Wisconsin Holstein producer Adam Faust’s federal lawsuit against USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins targets three cornerstone programs—Dairy Margin Coverage, Loan Guarantees, and EQIP—alleging they violate equal protection by offering preferential treatment worth up to $15,000 per project based solely on race and gender classifications . With DMC enrollment closing March 31, 2025, and margins averaging $11.61/cwt through 2024’s first ten months, producers face an uncomfortable reality: programs they depend on may be constitutionally vulnerable. The lawsuit builds on Faust’s successful 2021 challenge that eliminated $4 billion in race-based loan forgiveness, creating powerful legal precedent that could dismantle “up to two dozen other discriminatory programs” across USDA . While global dairy production grows 0.5% in 2025 and competitors pursue race-neutral support systems, American producers must grapple with whether demographic classifications distract from performance-based assistance that drives real operational improvements [4]. Every progressive dairy operation should immediately audit their government program dependencies and prepare contingency plans before judicial decisions reshape federal agricultural policy.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- DMC Administrative Fee Disparities Create $100 Annual Advantage: While standard producers pay $100 for identical margin protection at $0.15/cwt for $9.50 coverage, “socially disadvantaged” farmers receive the same catastrophic coverage free, multiplying across thousands of operations nationwide
- EQIP Cost-Share Gaps Deliver $15,000 Project Advantages: Standard participants receive 75% cost-sharing for conservation practices like manure storage systems, while preferred classifications qualify for 90% reimbursement—creating a $15,000 disparity on typical $100,000 environmental compliance projects
- Loan Guarantee Rates Affect Borrowing Power by 5%: USDA guarantees reach 95% for minority and female farmers versus 90% for others, directly impacting interest rates and lending terms on major refinancing like Faust’s $890,000 dairy operation loan
- Constitutional Precedent Threatens Program Stability: The 2021 Faust v. Vilsack victory plus Supreme Court’s 2023 Students for Fair Admissions decision create powerful legal framework challenging any race-based classifications, potentially forcing Congress to restructure agricultural support around income-based or performance metrics rather than demographic categories
- Global Competitors Pursue Race-Neutral Support Systems: While American dairy debates constitutional compliance, EU Common Agricultural Policy focuses on environmental outcomes and farm size, and New Zealand eliminated most subsidies decades ago, forcing efficiency improvements that strengthened international competitiveness
Wisconsin Holstein producer Adam Faust filed a federal lawsuit Monday against USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, alleging three key agricultural programs systematically discriminate against white male dairy farmers through preferential treatment that costs operations tens of thousands of dollars annually. The case targets the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) program, USDA Loan Guarantee program, and Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), claiming these initiatives violate constitutional equal protection principles while creating significant financial disparities across dairy operations nationwide.
The $890,000 Question: When Program Benefits Create Market Disadvantages
Here’s the reality facing dairy producers in 2025: your race and gender now determine how much federal support you can access. Faust, who operates a 70-head Registered Holstein operation near Chilton, Wisconsin, discovered this firsthand when he refinanced his dairy farm in August 2024.
While Faust qualified for a 90% USDA loan guarantee on his $890,000 refinancing, minority and female farmers in identical situations receive 95% guarantees. That 5-percentage-point difference translates directly into borrowing power, interest rates, and your operation’s financial flexibility.
Let’s face it – in today’s capital-intensive dairy industry, every basis point matters. When feed costs remain elevated and milk prices stay volatile, access to favorable financing can determine whether you expand, maintain, or exit the business.
The $100 Administrative Fee: A Constitutional Violation in Plain Sight?
The Dairy Margin Coverage program, which protects producers when the difference between the all-milk price and the average feed price falls below a certain dollar amount selected by the producer, charges most participants a $100 annual administrative fee. However, this fee disappears entirely for farmers classified as “limited resource, beginning, socially disadvantaged, or a military veteran .”
With DMC enrollment running from January 29 to March 31, 2025, and coverage levels ranging from $4 to $9.50 per hundredweight in 50-cent increments, this isn’t pocket change we’re discussing. The program’s effectiveness has been demonstrated repeatedly – research from HighGround Dairy shows that Tier I coverage at the $9.50 margin would have triggered payments in 65% of the months over the past decade.
“Our safety-net programs provide critical financial protections against commodity market volatilities for many American farmers, so don’t delay enrollment,” said USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) Administrator Zach Ducheneaux. “And at $0.15 per hundredweight for $9.50 coverage, risk protection through Dairy Margin Coverage is a relatively inexpensive investment in a true sense of security and peace of mind .”
But here’s what’s really concerning: Faust paid his $100 DMC administrative fee on March 25, 2025, while farmers in other demographic categories received identical coverage for free. Multiply this across thousands of dairy operations, and you’re looking at millions in differential treatment.
EQIP Conservation: When 90% vs 75% Cost-Share Creates Competitive Gaps
The Environmental Quality Incentives Program presents perhaps the most significant financial disparity. Standard EQIP participants receive up to 75% cost-sharing for conservation practices, while “socially disadvantaged, limited-resource, beginning, and veteran farmer and ranchers are eligible for cost-share rates of up to 90 percent .”
Consider the math on a typical manure storage system – exactly what Faust plans for his operation. On a $100,000 project, that 15-percentage-point difference means $15,000 more out-of-pocket expenses for some farmers compared to others. When margins are tight and environmental compliance costs continue rising, this disparity affects operational competitiveness.
The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition confirms that these enhanced benefits extend beyond just cost-sharing rates. This same population of producers is also eligible for up to 50 percent advance payment for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training.
The Uncomfortable Constitutional Question: Have We Forgotten Equal Protection?
Here’s the question nobody wants to ask: When did American dairy farmers become so dependent on federal subsidies that we’ll accept constitutional violations for a $100 fee waiver?
This lawsuit exposes an uncomfortable reality about our industry’s relationship with government programs. We’ve built entire business models around accessing preferential treatment, loan guarantees, and conservation cost-shares that may fundamentally violate the principle of equal protection under the law.
Table 1: Financial Disparities in Challenged USDA Programs
| Program | Standard Rate | Socially Disadvantaged Rate | Annual Difference |
| DMC Administrative Fee | $100 | $0 (waived) | $100 |
| Loan Guarantee Program | 90% guarantee | 95% guarantee | 5% advantage |
| EQIP Cost-Share | Up to 75% | Up to 90% | 15% advantage |
Are we so comfortable with this system that we’ve forgotten what true market-based agriculture looks like?
Legal Precedent: The 2021 Victory That Changed Everything
Faust isn’t entering this battle unprepared. His successful 2021 lawsuit against the Biden administration halted a COVID-19 loan forgiveness program that excluded white farmers, establishing legal precedent that race-based agricultural programs violate constitutional equal protection principles.
That earlier victory, combined with the Supreme Court’s 2023 Students for Fair Admissions decision limiting race-conscious policies, creates a powerful legal foundation. The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, representing Faust, has already secured seven significant court victories challenging similar programs across 25 states.
What This Constitutional Challenge Means for Your Operation
Immediate Impact: If you’re currently enrolled in DMC, loan guarantee programs, or planning EQIP applications, understand that these policies may face significant changes. The Trump administration finds itself in the awkward position of defending programs that contradict its anti-DEI platform.
Financial Planning: Operations relying on the enhanced benefits available through “socially disadvantaged” classifications should prepare contingency plans. A successful lawsuit could eliminate preferential treatment across multiple USDA programs simultaneously.
Risk Management: With DMC proving its value through consistent performance and coverage at just $0.15 per hundredweight for $9.50 protection, the core program remains solid regardless of administrative fee structures. Don’t let policy uncertainty derail your risk management strategy.
Industry-Wide Ramifications: Beyond Individual Operations
This lawsuit targets more than three programs. The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty has identified “up to two dozen other discriminatory programs” across USDA that use similar classification systems. A successful challenge could trigger comprehensive policy changes affecting:
- Conservation program funding priorities
- Disaster assistance distribution
- Equipment purchase loan terms
- Technical assistance access
- Grant program eligibility
The Global Context: How Other Dairy Nations Handle Farmer Support
While American dairy farmers debate classification-based programs, international competitors pursue different approaches to farmer support. The European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy focuses on environmental outcomes and farm size rather than demographic characteristics. New Zealand eliminated most production subsidies decades ago, forcing efficiency improvements that strengthened their global competitiveness.
This raises uncomfortable questions: Are we creating the most effective support systems for American dairy farmers, or are demographic classifications distracting from performance-based assistance that drives real operational improvements?
The Constitutional vs. Practical Debate
Here’s where dairy farmers face a fundamental choice: support programs based on constitutional principles of equal treatment or accept targeted assistance that acknowledges historical discrimination in agricultural lending. The USDA’s own data shows that minority farmers historically faced higher loan rejection rates and less favorable terms.
But does addressing past discrimination through current preferential treatment create new inequities? When a Wisconsin Holstein producer pays $100 for DMC coverage while his neighbor receives it free, the constitutional argument becomes personally relevant.
Bottom Line: Preparing for Policy Uncertainty
Smart dairy managers prepare for multiple scenarios. Whether you benefit from current preferential programs or feel disadvantaged by them, policy stability remains uncertain. Here’s your action plan:
- Secure Current Benefits: If you qualify for enhanced USDA programs, complete applications before potential policy changes. The DMC enrollment deadline is March 31, 2025.
- Diversify Risk Management: Don’t rely solely on government programs for financial protection. While valuable at $0.15 per hundredweight for $9.50 coverage, the DMC program shouldn’t be your only margin protection strategy.
- Document Everything: Whether you’re affected positively or negatively by current policies, maintain detailed records of program interactions. Policy changes may trigger retroactive adjustments.
- Stay Informed: This lawsuit represents broader political movements challenging race-conscious policies across all government agencies. Monitor developments beyond agriculture that may signal wider policy shifts.
The dairy industry thrives on consistent, predictable policies that support operational efficiency and long-term planning. Whether you agree with or oppose current USDA classification systems, uncertainty helps nobody. The sooner these constitutional questions get resolved, the sooner we can focus on what really matters: producing safe, affordable milk for American families while maintaining profitable, sustainable operations.
The lawsuit’s outcome will determine whether America’s dairy support programs emphasize equal treatment or targeted assistance – a choice with implications far beyond Adam Faust’s 70-cow Holstein operation in Wisconsin.
Learn More:
- USDA FSA Office Closures: The Hard Truth Every Dairy Producer Needs to Face Now – Reveals practical strategies for adapting to diminishing FSA support through enhanced record-keeping, alternative financial relationships, and digital tools that reduce dependency on government services.
- USDA’s $10 Billion Farm Handout Leaves Dairy Producers High and Dry – Demonstrates how dairy exclusion from federal programs extends beyond constitutional challenges, providing strategic insights for maximizing alternative revenue streams and program eligibility.
- Dairy’s Bold New Frontier: How Forward-Thinking Producers Are Redefining the Industry – Showcases innovative approaches reducing government program dependency through technology adoption, revenue diversification, and systems thinking that deliver measurable competitive advantages.
Join the Revolution!
Join the Revolution!Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
