Your beef-on-dairy revenue just dropped $196K. But producers who saw this coming lost only $27K. The difference? One strategy.
Executive Summary: October’s 11.5% cattle crash proved that beef-on-dairy isn’t the risk diversification producers thought it was—it’s a $196,000 lesson in modern market volatility. In just twelve days, political intervention aimed at consumer prices overwhelmed market fundamentals, dropping crossbred calf values from $1,400 to $1,239. Dairy operations with 40% beef breeding lost the equivalent of $0.54/cwt on their milk price, while Class IV simultaneously dropped $2.99. The immediate threat: Mexican cattle imports resuming could push prices down another $89 per head to $1,150. But producers who kept beef breeding at 30-35% and maintained 12-month operating reserves are weathering this storm with manageable losses. The new playbook is clear: cap beef revenue at 10% of total income, hedge everything you can’t afford to lose, and build financial reserves that assume policy shocks are when, not if.

When feeder cattle futures dropped 11.5% between October 16 and 27, Tim Clifton from Oklahoma City called it “a slap in the face” in his interview with Brownfield Ag News. That phrase keeps coming up in conversations across the dairy community. What started as this promising approach—breeding dairy cows to beef bulls to produce those valuable crossbred calves—has turned into quite an education on modern market dynamics.
Here’s what’s interesting. A typical scenario involves a 1,500-cow operation in central Wisconsin that was counting on $1,400 per crossbred calf based on late-summer conditions. Today? Those same calves are bringing $1,239 if they’re lucky. The USDA Economic Research Service has been tracking this, and we’re talking about roughly $196,088 in lost annual revenue for an operation that size. That’s basically like taking a $ 0.54-per-hundredweight hit on milk prices.
And it’s not happening in isolation. Class IV milk prices dropped $2.99 between September and October—from $19.16 down to $16.17, according to Federal Milk Marketing Order reports. So operations that thought they’d diversified their risk are discovering they’ve actually concentrated it in ways nobody really anticipated.
How Multiple Forces Converged in Twelve Days
October 16-27: The Timeline That Changed Everything
- Oct 16: Trump announces beef prices “coming down” – futures begin dropping
- Oct 22: Presidential social media post targets cattle prices directly
- Oct 23-25: Argentine quota expansion announced (20,000 to 80,000 MT)
- Oct 27: December live cattle down to $227.17 from $248.88
Let me walk through what actually happened, because the timeline reveals how several factors created this challenging situation. On October 16, President Trump announced that beef prices would be “coming down pretty soon.” The Chicago Mercantile Exchange December live cattle futures—trading at $248.875 per hundredweight that morning—started dropping immediately.

But here’s where multiple factors created this perfect storm. That same period, the latest USDA Cattle on Feed reports had been showing consistently lower placements—August placements were down 10% year-over-year according to USDA data, continuing a pattern that began when Mexican cattle imports stopped in May. This actually should have been supportive for prices, but the market was already spooked.
Meanwhile, the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index had declined to 94.6 in October, down from September’s 95.6, reflecting broader economic concerns that could affect beef demand ahead. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service data shows mixed export performance, with weekly fluctuations in sales to key markets such as Japan and South Korea, adding to the uncertainty.
Then came October 22. The President posted on social media: “The Cattle Ranchers, who I love, don’t understand that the only reason they are doing so well…is because I put Tariffs on cattle coming into the United States…they also have to get their prices down, because the consumer is a very big factor in my thinking.”
CME Group data from October 27 shows December live cattle futures had fallen to $227.175—a $21.70 drop in less than two weeks. November feeder cattle contracts hit the expanded daily limit of $13.75 down. Some contracts were “locked limit down,” meaning there were sellers everywhere but no buyers at any price within the trading limits.
Austin Schroeder from Brugler Marketing & Analytics explained it perfectly: “Managed money has a huge net long in the cattle market. With all the headlines over the last week and a half, there is just some general risk-off. Everybody is wanting out, and the door is only so big.”
What made this crash particularly severe was the convergence of:
- Political intervention signals that spooked speculative money
- Uncertainty from conflicting supply signals—fewer cattle placed, but policy pressure ahead
- Weakening consumer confidence affecting demand projections
- Southern feedlots are reducing purchases after Mexican import restrictions (stopped since May 2025 due to screwworm)
- The announcement expanding Argentine beef quotas from 20,000 to 80,000 metric tons annually
- Managed money funds liquidating large long positions per the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reports
You know what’s worth noting? Even smaller regional processors got caught in this. They depend on a steady local cattle supply, and when auction prices went haywire, some had to reduce processing days temporarily. That ripple effect hit local producers who’d built relationships with these smaller plants.
Understanding What This Really Costs

Quick Numbers for Your Planning
- Average annual beef revenue decline: $196,088
- Per-cow impact: $130.72
- Where beef breeding probably should be: 30-35% (down from 40-50%)
- Operating reserves you need now: 12+ months (not the old 3-6 months)
- Crossbred calf price drop: From $1,400 to $1,239 (-11.5%)
The National Agricultural Statistics Service has documented how cattle sales grew from 4% of dairy farm revenue in 2019 to 9% by 2024. That’s a share of many operations built right into financial planning—debt service, expansion plans, everything.
Take a representative Midwest operation with 40% of the herd bred to beef, producing about 540 crossbred calves annually:
Crossbred calf revenue:
- What you planned on (at $1,400/head): $756,000
- What you’re getting now (at $1,239/head): $669,060
- That’s a difference of: $86,940
Plus cull cow sales—typically about 525 head at a 35% culling rate. The USDA Agricultural Marketing Service reports from late October show:
Cull cow revenue:
- What you expected (at $165/cwt): $1,212,750
- What you’re seeing now (at $150.15/cwt): $1,103,602
- That’s another: $109,148 gone
Combined: $196,088 in reduced beef revenue annually, or about $130.72 per cow in the milking herd.
The breeding decisions that created these calves were made between January and March 2025, when everything looked promising. Those cows can’t be unbred. The calves entering the market from November through February will sell at whatever the market offers.
Regional differences add another layer. Border state operations have typically managed import competition differently, with many maintaining more conservative beef breeding percentages and purchasing additional risk management coverage when import restrictions created temporary market support. But the speed at which prices adjusted everywhere caught even experienced producers off guard.
What I’ve noticed is that organic and grass-fed dairy operations face a different challenge. Their premium milk markets help offset some beef revenue loss, but their crossbred calves from grass-based systems sometimes don’t fit conventional feeding programs as well. They’re having to work harder to find the right buyers who value those genetics.
The Mexican Import Question
Mexican Import Timeline – What to Expect
- Phase 1 (Announcement): 3-5% price drop within days of reopening news
- Phase 2 (30-60 days): Additional 2-4% decline as cattle reach U.S. feedlots
- Phase 3 (3-6 months): Prices stabilize around $1,150/head with full integration
- Supply gap: 855,000 head currently missing from the normal annual flow
Mexican Agricultural Minister Julio Berdegué is meeting this week with Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins about reopening protocols. According to USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service data, Mexico historically sends about 1.25 million cattle annually to the U.S.—worth over $1 billion. Those imports stopped in May 2025 when New World Screwworm was detected.
Through July, only about 230,000 head crossed the border according to USDA trade statistics. That leaves a supply gap of roughly 855,000 head, which has been supporting prices all year.

CattleFax projections and agricultural economists suggest the reopening could play out in three distinct phases we need to prepare for.
Market Structure Lessons
Metric | September 2025 | October 2025 | Decline | Risk Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crossbred Calf Price | $1,400/head | $1,239/head | -11.5% | 🔴 High |
| Class IV Milk Price | $19.16/cwt | $16.17/cwt | -15.6% | 🔴 High |
| Combined Per-Cow Impact | $0.00 | $130.72 loss | Catastrophic | 🔴 Concentrated |
Here’s something revealing. On October 27, while feeder cattle were locked limit down, wholesale boxed beef prices actually increased. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service data shows Choice gained $2.12 to hit $377.88 per hundredweight, and Select jumped $3.69.
One analyst noted bluntly: “Maybe the President should have attacked the packing industry for the excessively high prices they’re getting for beef.”
According to the USDA Economic Research Service’s 2024 analysis, four firms control about 85% of beef processing capacity. During disruptions, they can manage the spread between what they pay producers and what they charge retailers. For those accustomed to Federal Milk Marketing Order price transparency, this has been educational.
Strategic Response: What Successful Operations Are Doing
After extensive conversations with producers, consultants, and lenders over the past two weeks, clear patterns are emerging among operations weathering this crisis successfully.
Immediate Breeding Adjustments Operations are reducing November-December beef breeding from 40-45% down to 30-35%. As one California producer explained, “I’d rather leave $27,000 on the table than risk another $148,000 loss.” This conservative approach reflects hard-learned lessons from October’s volatility.
Looking at this trend, what farmers are finding is that flexibility matters more than maximizing any single revenue stream. Those who kept some dairy bulls for replacements are glad they did—replacement heifer prices from beef-on-dairy matings are getting expensive when you need to rebuild.
Risk Management Implementation USDA Risk Management Agency data shows LRP insurance enrollment for 2026 calf sales has increased significantly. Despite elevated premiums, setting floor prices at $1,150-$1,200 provides catastrophic loss protection. Penn State Extension’s March 2024 research demonstrates that direct relationships with feeders can yield $50-100 per-head premiums while reducing volatility exposure.
Capital Structure Reinforcement: Financial consultants at Farm Credit Services report that operations that successfully navigated this period generally maintained 9-12 months of operating capital, versus the typical 3-6 months. Agricultural lenders at CoBank are advising clients to build toward 12-month reserves. As one banker explained, “Future survivors will be distinguished by liquidity, not just production efficiency.”
Revenue Concentration Limits: If beef revenue exceeds 10% of total farm income, most consultants suggest reducing exposure to beef. Traditional cattle cycles based on biology might be less reliable as policy interventions become more common. Building operational flexibility matters more than ever.
Generational Transition Adjustments The 2022 Census of Agriculture shows the average farmer age at 58 years. Many operations built beef-on-dairy revenue into succession financing. With $196,000 in annual revenue gone, those carefully planned transitions need reassessment. Mark Stephenson, Director of Dairy Policy Analysis at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, observed in recent market commentary: “Policy-driven volatility during generational transition periods can force ownership changes that wouldn’t happen under stable conditions.”
Historical Context and Future Outlook
The Inter-American Development Bank documented Argentina’s 2005-2008 experience, in which government price controls led to a 9% decline in the national herd over three years, ultimately resulting in higher prices than the intervention was meant to prevent.
Based on CattleFax projections and agricultural economist consensus, the likely U.S. trajectory:
2026: Lower prices discourage expansion
2027: Supplies tighten, prices start recovering
2028: Possible supply shortage, crossbred calves could hit $1,800-2,200
2029: If prices reach politically sensitive levels, intervention might recur

This policy-driven cycle differs from traditional biological cattle cycles. When you consider it, breeding decisions once focused primarily on butterfat performance and calving ease. Now they incorporate political risk assessment. That’s quite a shift.
Moving Forward with Perspective
October’s market adjustment doesn’t eliminate beef-on-dairy as a viable strategy. At $1,150-1,200 per calf, meaningful supplemental revenue remains. What’s changed is our understanding of the risk profile.
Tom Miller, operating 2,100 cows near Turlock, California, shared a valuable perspective: “My grandfather dealt with the Depression, my father with the 1980s farm crisis, and now we’re dealing with policy volatility. Every generation faces challenges that the previous one didn’t see coming. The key is adapting fast enough.”
What’s encouraging is how producers are treating this as education rather than disaster. They’re right-sizing programs, implementing risk management, and building operations that can handle volatility while capturing opportunities. Whether you’re managing transition periods with fresh cows, working through heat-stress challenges in the Southeast, or running drylot systems out West, the fundamentals still matter—we just layer risk management on top now.
This development suggests we need to think differently about diversification. It’s not just about adding revenue streams within agriculture anymore. Some operations are looking at solar leases, carbon credits, or agritourism. Others are focusing on value-added products that aren’t as exposed to commodity price swings.
October has been an expensive education. But it’s taught us something important about modern agricultural markets. Success going forward requires not just production excellence and cost management—though those remain essential—but recognizing changed market structures and adjusting accordingly.
The cattle market crash was costly tuition. The question now is whether we apply these lessons before the next cycle emerges. Because these past two weeks have made clear there will be a next time. As many have learned, being prepared makes all the difference.
Key Takeaways:
- Beef breeding above 35% is now high-risk: October’s crash cost 40% operations $196,088—reduce to 30-35% immediately
- Policy beats fundamentals: 12 days, one presidential tweet, 11.5% price drop—this is the new market reality
- Cash reserves are survival: Operations with 12-month reserves survived; those with 3-6 months are scrambling
- $1,150 calves are coming: Mexican import resumption (decision imminent) will drop prices another 7% from the current $1,239
- The 10% rule: Successful operations cap beef revenue at 10% of total income—true diversification means multiple sectors
Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.
Learn More:
- Building a Beef-on-Dairy System: Capturing $360,000 in Annual Farm Profit – Provides detailed implementation strategies for systematic beef-on-dairy programs, including genetics selection criteria, colostrum protocols, and direct feedlot contracting methods that can generate $1,200-$1,250 per calf versus $950 at auction.
- Trump Promised Cheaper Beef – Here’s Your $160,000 Counter-Move – Reveals contrarian strategies for the current market disruption, demonstrating how producers can generate $400,000 revenue streams through strategic heifer development while others chase volatile beef premiums, using genomic testing and sexed semen optimization.
- $200 Holstein Bulls to $1400 Beef Crosses: The $150 Fix Your $7,000 Consultant Won’t Tell You – Breaks down the exact genetics decisions and sire selection criteria that add $60,000+ in annual revenue, focusing on simple implementation fixes that cost $150 but deliver returns consultants charge thousands to recommend.
Join the Revolution!
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

Join the Revolution!













































