meta Why America’s Dairy Farms Are Disappearing: Unpacking the Impact of Milk Price Rules | The Bullvine
dairy sector crisis, family-owned farms decline, Federal Milk Marketing Orders, milk production technology, dairy farm competition, milk sales revenue, sustainable dairy farming, global trade impact, dairy consumption patterns, dairy industry reforms

Why America’s Dairy Farms Are Disappearing: Unpacking the Impact of Milk Price Rules

Find out why America’s dairy farms are disappearing. Learn how milk price rules affect farmers and explore challenges and solutions in our analysis.

The dairy sector in the United States is in the midst of a pressing crisis as family-owned farms are rapidly disappearing. According to data from the USDA,  Washington had over 1,500 dairy farms in the 1980s, but by 2020, that number had dropped to fewer than 400. This is not an isolated incident but a significant trend eroding America’s agricultural legacy. The vanishing of dairy farms has profound effects on rural communities, customers, and the industry. Outdated milk pricing policies are pushing farmers into financial distress. Join us as we delve into the complex web that has hastened the loss of America’s dairy farms, explicitly focusing on Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO). Small dairy producers are grappling with substantial obstacles due to these archaic regulations.

The Vanishing Fields of American Dairy Farming 

Over the last several decades, the American dairy landscape has changed dramatically. The number of dairy farms has dropped significantly. In 1970, the United States had more than 648,000 dairy farms. By 2022, just 24,470 remain (USDA). This sharp drop highlights the issues that the business faces today.

Meanwhile, the average herd size on the remaining farms has increased. More than 60% of total milk production currently occurs on farms with over 2,500 cows. This growth represents a shift towards large-scale operations, often driven by economic pressures and economies of scale. In contrast, smaller farms struggle to compete, resulting in the concentration today. Such developments have far-reaching ramifications for rural communities and the agricultural industry.

The Domino Effect: Economic and Social Ramifications of Dairy Farm Consolidation 

The consolidation of dairy farms has profound implications for rural communities. When small farms shut down, the ripple effects reverberate throughout the local economy. The reduction in farms means fewer jobs, not just on the farms themselves but also in adjacent industries such as feed suppliers, equipment sellers, and local supermarkets. Dairy farming was the economic backbone of many communities, and its disappearance could inflict significant harm on the community.

Furthermore, eliminating small farms weakens these communities' social fabric. School enrollments are decreasing, local businesses are seeing fewer customers, and the feeling of community, generally based on farming, is fading. This is more than simply economics; it is about the essential lifeblood of rural communities.

Furthermore, large-scale farms often prioritize efficiency and productivity, which might result in less attention on sustainable methods and animal care. Large enterprises are more likely to emphasize profit above quality; however, this is not always the case. This dynamic highlights the need to support local dairy farmers and understand the more significant ramifications of food production and consumption.

The Pricing Predicament: Why Milk Money Falls Short 

The Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO), created in 1937, provided a lifeline to American dairy producers. Their primary purpose was to stabilize the unpredictable milk market and guarantee that farmers were paid fairly and on time for their supplies. By establishing a consistent minimum price for milk based on its ultimate use, the FMMO attempted to create a more predictable and fair system for farmers, who were often at the whim of unpredictable market circumstances.

The dairy business has seen significant transformation during the last few decades. Advances in milk production, refrigeration, and transportation technology have enabled bigger farms to produce and distribute milk more effectively, significantly increasing the total milk supply and lowering pricing. Meanwhile, as production costs—such as cow feed, labor, and veterinary care—increase, milk sales revenue has not kept up, making it more difficult for smaller and mid-sized farms to compete.

In 2022, researchers at the University of Tennessee matched regional milk prices to the critical production costs: feed and labor. The data demonstrate why farmers are suffering. From 2005 to 2020, milk sales revenue per 100 pounds of milk produced varied between $11.54 and $29.80, with an average price of $18.57. During the same time, the total cost of producing 100 pounds of milk varied from $11.27 to $43.88, with an average of $25.80. On average, a cow that produced 24,000 pounds of milk earned around $4,457. However, it costs $6,192 to make that milk, resulting in a loss for the dairy farmer.

Milk quality, manufacturing, transportation, and processing improvements have increased milk production, longer shelf life, and greater product availability. However, the current FMMO system has not evolved to accommodate these advancements, underscoring the need for reform. Updating the FMMO to reflect current production costs, market dynamics, and technological improvements could lead to a more equitable framework for all dairy producers. This highlights the potential for positive change and the importance of supporting small dairy farms in the face of these challenges.

More efficient farms may lower production costs by increasing cow health, reproductive performance, and feed-to-milk conversion ratios. Larger farms or organizations of farmers, such as Dairy Farmers of America, may also benefit from forward contracting for grain and future milk prices. Regardless of size, success in the dairy sector requires passion, devotion, and intelligent business management.

Economic Pressures: The Financial Squeeze on Dairy Farmers 

Let's go right to the point: economic pressures. Dairy producers have faced increased production expenses such as feed, labor, and equipment. According to University of Tennessee studies, between 2005 and 2020, the revenue from milk sales per 100 pounds produced varied from $11.54 to $29.80, with an average of $18.57. However, the cost of producing 100 pounds of milk varied between $11.27 and $43.88, with an average of $25.80.

This significant discrepancy implies that, on average, a cow producing 24,000 pounds of milk generates $4,457 in income. However, making that milk costs around $6,192, resulting in severe losses for dairy producers. Such a financial burden is unsustainable, which explains why many small and medium-sized farms struggle to survive.

More efficient farms may reduce these expenses marginally by leveraging advances in cow health, reproductive performance, and feed-to-milk conversion ratios. However, the necessity for costly technologies and economies of scale sometimes disadvantages smaller farms. The existing pricing mechanism may need to be updated to account for increased expenses, ensuring that dairy farmers can continue their critical jobs without financial difficulty.

Staying Afloat: How Larger Farms and Cooperatives Navigate Economic Pressures

Bigger farms and cooperatives rely on efficiency and flexibility to remain afloat under economic challenges. Unlike smaller businesses, bigger dairy farms may spread their high fixed costs over many production units, resulting in economies of scale. This allows them to produce milk cheaper per unit, providing a competitive advantage.

Adopting precise technology is a crucial strategy for increasing efficiency. Robotic milking systems, which can milk cows with little human interaction, and rotary parlors, meant to expedite the milking process for big herds, significantly cut labor expenses. Wearable technology monitors cow health in real time, allowing for prompt treatments that boost overall herd production. These advances improve agricultural efficiency, reduce errors, and lower expenses.

Forward contracting is another approach big farms and cooperatives use, such as Dairy Farmers of America. Dairy producers may avoid market volatility by locking in future milk prices and feed expenses. This financial foresight allows for better planning and lowers the danger of unexpected income cuts due to market swings. Consequently, these forward-thinking techniques enable bigger organizations to forecast better and maintain their financial performance.

While these solutions relieve them, they need significant upfront investment and knowledge, making them more accessible to bigger farms. As a result, the sector is becoming more consolidated, with only the most efficient and adaptable enterprises surviving and flourishing.

Dairy Farming: One Size Doesn't Fit All 

Dairy farming in the United States needs to be standardized. Different areas have distinct economic landscapes because of the various milk price policies and production costs. For example, the Upper Midwest specializes in large-scale cheese and butter manufacturing, while the Southeast concentrates on bottled milk. Each of these industries is subject to different Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO), which impact their income.

Farmers in the Upper Midwest, where cheese manufacturing is dominant, often get different pricing than in the Southeast, where bottled milk is more common. Farmers' revenue levels vary depending on the price category: Class 3 for cheese and Class 1 for bottled milk. Furthermore, production expenses like feed and labor differ by location, placing extra financial strain on farmers in certain places. A University of Tennessee research emphasized these geographical inequalities, pointing out that locations highly engaged in bottled milk manufacturing may have less flexibility to control rising prices.

Insurance and hedging schemes provide temporary respite. Dairy Revenue Protection (DRP) and Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) programs may help farmers prepare for unanticipated price decreases or increased production expenses. However, these short-term fixes do not address the more significant systemic problem of pricing structures that fail to pay manufacturing costs.

While these initiatives help some farms survive, they are not a cure-all. More substantial FMMO changes are required to guarantee that pricing is sustainable and reflects current production realities in all areas.

Heritage Over Profit: The Family Legacy Behind Dairy Farming Survival

Many dairy farmers believe that remaining in business is more than simply the financial line; it is also about family legacy. Dairy farming is typically passed down through generations, becoming firmly established in the family's identity and history. Despite the economic hurdles and low milk prices, many farms continue to operate since leaving the sector feels like losing a part of themselves.

The value of family legacy in dairy farming cannot be emphasized. The USDA reports that 97% of dairy farms in the United States are owned and maintained by families. This substantial family bond often feeds the fortitude necessary to overcome financial difficulties. Dairy farming is not just a source of income for many families; it is also their heritage.

However, succession planning presents a substantial challenge. According to the 2022 Census of Agriculture, farmers have an average age of 58.1, reflecting an aging profession. Younger generations are taking up the profession, which is encouraging. However, they account for just a small percentage—about 9% of "young farmers" aged 34 or younger.

Please prepare for succession to ensure the viability of these farms is maintained. A meager 53% of dairy farmers have designated a successor, underscoring the need for good estate planning. Transferring ownership and operational expertise to future generations is critical to the long-term viability of these family farms. Proper planning preserves the farm's viability, even when it passes to younger family members who must negotiate current agricultural issues.

Finally, combining family legacy and intentional succession planning is critical to American dairy farms' long-term viability and prosperity. Addressing these concerns will help ensure that dairy farming leaves a rich legacy for future generations.

The Global Dance: How International Trade and Milk Prices Shape American Dairy Farms

International commerce and worldwide milk prices significantly impact the economic situation for U.S. dairy producers. International rivalry might cause local prices to fall, putting extra pressure on tight profit margins. For example, nations with lower production costs may export milk and milk products at lower prices, making it difficult for U.S. farmers to compete.

Trade agreements offer an additional degree of complication. Deals like the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) can create new markets while increasing competition. For example, the USMCA enhanced access to the Canadian dairy market while simultaneously requiring the United States to abolish some subsidies that had traditionally served as a safety net for farmers.

Global milk prices vary for various reasons, such as feed costs, weather events, and changes in consumer demand worldwide. When worldwide prices are low, U.S. farmers generally get less for their milk, further reducing profit margins. On the other hand, high worldwide prices might give a brief relief, but they are often accompanied by rising production costs, making the total effect on farmers' bottom lines uncertain.

The combination of foreign competitiveness and local pricing systems results in a volatile environment. This emphasizes the need for responsive policies that assist U.S. dairy farmers in staying competitive on a global scale while supporting their livelihoods.

A Shift in Appetite: How Changing Dairy Consumption Patterns Affect Dairy Farms 

How Americans eat dairy has changed over time, with substantial repercussions for the business. The transition from liquid milk to solid dairy products such as cheese, yogurt, and butter impacts small and big dairy farms.

For starters, greater cheese consumption has helped industrial divisions that produce Class 3 milk used in cheese. According to a USDA survey, U.S. cheese consumption has increased significantly, with the typical American now eating more than 38 pounds yearly [source]. This transition has increased demand in specific locations and among bigger producers capable of meeting the strict quality and volume standards for cheese manufacturing.

Conversely, decreased liquid milk consumption has presented issues, especially in places classified as FMMOs with a heavy emphasis on Class 1 milk. These places have seen more economic difficulty since bottled milk prices remain high, yet demand has decreased. As a result, smaller farms that have historically depended on liquid milk sales may face more financial challenges.

The mismatch in consumption habits has also compelled the sector to adjust. Farms have had to pivot to produce milk that meets the demand for cheese, yogurt, and other dairy products. This often necessitates various operating scales and investments in specialized technology. The reallocation of resources and the need for more modern processing and transportation capabilities marks a substantial change in dairy farming's operating environment.

So, Where Do We Go From Here? 

So, where do we proceed from here? The FMMO's continual reforms provide a lifeline to dairy producers. These changes attempt to reflect the changing dairy landscape better. Cost supports for cheese, butter, and nonfat dry milk may need to be adjusted for cows' capacity to produce more fat and protein.

The USDA is leading the modification process to amend old rules to reflect current production capacity and economic restrictions. However, these adjustments must appropriately reflect and address the financial issues that dairy farmers face. It's not just a numbers game; it's about protecting America's rural economy. According to the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), the proposed changes seek to balance benefits throughout the supply chain [IDFA].

Adjusting milk prices is only one aspect of the issue. Comprehensive reforms must include instructional programs to help farmers understand and manage the changes. The success of these modifications is determined by their ability to reduce the gap between production costs and profits. While only time will tell, this is a step toward ensuring the survival of an important industry.

The Dairy Business Innovation Initiatives of the United States Department of Agriculture are also an essential element of the picture. These projects aim to help dairy farmers remain solvent. They provide funds, research, and technical support to help farmers innovate and adapt to changing market circumstances. Imagine surviving and flourishing by discovering innovative methods to add value to conventional dairy products.

Speaking of adding value, many farmers are considering value-added activities. Farmers may increase their share of the retail price by processing their milk into cheese, yogurt, or other specialty dairy products and selling them directly to customers. Sure, this technique has financial risks and requires more effort. However, it provides a larger return on investment. It fosters a closer relationship with consumers who want to support local farmers.

What is the main takeaway here? While underlying challenges such as outmoded pricing methods will take time to resolve, these programs provide dairy farmers with tools to help them negotiate a tricky business. They are more than simply band-aids; they provide avenues to sustainability and, possibly, success in the current agricultural environment.

The Bottom Line

American dairy farms are dying alarmingly due to antiquated milk pricing policies and a widening disparity between production costs and earnings. While bigger farms and cooperatives find ways to survive, the economic constraints on smaller family-run businesses remain enormous. As a legacy enterprise, dairy farming confronts obstacles in passing the torch to the next generation. Changing consumption habits adds another complexity, emphasizing the urgent need for change.

As we consider these challenges, we can't help but question whether the impending reforms and innovations will be sufficient to support small dairy farms or whether we are seeing the evolution of an industry that may lose its most traditional foundations. The future of dairy farming and milk pricing in the United States is fragile. What part will you take in shaping it?

Key Takeaways:

  • The number of U.S. dairy farms has drastically decreased from over 648,000 in 1970 to only 24,470 in 2022.
  • Larger farms now dominate the dairy industry, with over 60% of production occurring on farms with more than 2,500 cows.
  • Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO), established in 1937, set minimum milk prices, often resulting in farmers being underpaid relative to production costs.
  • The average cost to produce 100 pounds of milk from 2005 to 2020 was $25.80, while the average income was only $18.57, resulting in financial losses for many farmers.
  • Some regions and smaller farms are more affected by economic pressures due to varying milk classification prices and rising production costs.
  • Technological investments like robotic milking systems can help larger farms reduce labor costs and improve efficiency.
  • Ninety-seven percent of U.S. dairy farms are family-owned, facing challenges in succession planning and transitioning to the next generation.
  • Dairy consumption patterns have shifted, with Americans consuming more cheese, yogurt, and butter but less fluid milk.
  • Reforming the FMMO could help align milk prices with production costs, offering a potential solution to the dairy industry's economic challenges.
  • Direct-to-consumer sales and value-added dairy products are emerging as viable but risky strategies for some farmers.

Summary:

Dairy farming in America is teetering on the brink of extinction. Once the backbone of rural communities, dairy farms are rapidly dwindling, with the number of farms plummeting from over 648,000 in 1970 to just 24,470 in 2022. This decline has profound economic and social impacts, weakening the fabric of rural America and distancing consumers from the origins of their food. The outdated and complex Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO) play a significant role in this crisis. Established in 1937 to stabilize milk markets and ensure fair payments, these regulations have not kept pace with advances in milk production, refrigeration, and transportation. As production costs rise and milk prices remain static, small to mid-sized farms struggle to survive. Coupled with changing consumer habits and international trade pressures, the challenges for dairy farmers are immense. While large-scale farms thrive through efficiency and productivity, smaller farms find competing increasingly authoritarian. The dairy sector now demands passion, dedication, and astute business management to navigate its turbulent waters.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week's top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
(T394, D23)
Send this to a friend