Image
FacebookEmailTwitterRSS

Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Overlays

Archive for milk components

Bred for $3 Butterfat, Selling at $2.50: Inside the 5-Year Gap That’s Reshaping Genetic Strategy

Wednesday, December 17th, 2025

Bred for $3 fat. Paid $2.50. The 5-year genetic timing gap just got real—and the smartest dairies are already adapting.

Executive Summary: October 2024 delivered record U.S. butterfat at 4.30%—genomic selection is doing exactly what it promised. The problem is timing: those genetics were chosen when fat topped $3.00 per pound, and today’s market pays $2.50. This 5-7 year gap between breeding decisions and bulk tank reality is dairy’s toughest planning challenge, made more complex by an April 2025 Net Merit $ revision that increased butterfat emphasis just as prices softened. Factor in heifer inventories at 20-year lows—CoBank projects 800,000 fewer replacements through 2027—and record cheese exports making protein the processing bottleneck, and genetic strategy looks different than it did three years ago. The producers navigating this well are leaning on economic indices rather than chasing premiums, building health traits into their programs, and treating extended productive life as the new margin strategy. The window for assessing your positioning runs through 2026—before current selections fully express into whatever market awaits.

You know what struck me when I was looking at the October milk production numbers? That month delivered the highest butterfat production in U.S. dairy history. We’re talking 1.947 billion pounds at 4.30% concentration—that’s straight from USDA’s November report. By any measure, genomic selection delivered exactly what it promised. The science worked.

But here’s what’s interesting. Those genetics trace back to breeding decisions made in 2021-2022, when butterfat was running north of $3.00 per pound on CME spot markets. Some of you probably remember that October 2022 peak at $3.18. Farmers making aggressive butterfat selections back then were doing exactly what the numbers told them to do. Made perfect sense at the time.

Now those genetics are expressing into a market paying $2.50-2.80 per pound. That’s just how it played out.

And look, this isn’t about second-guessing anyone. It’s about understanding something we all have to work with: genetic cycles run on 5-7-year timelines, while commodity markets… well, you’ve seen how fast those can shift. That timing mismatch creates challenges, no matter how sound the original thinking was.

QUICK TAKE: The Numbers That Matter

  • 4.30% butterfat — October 2024’s record test, up from 4.08% five years ago
  • 0.77 protein-to-fat ratio — Below the 0.82-0.84 optimal range for cheese plants
  • $3,000-$4,000 — Current replacement heifer prices (75% increase since April 2023)
  • 508,808 metric tons — Record U.S. cheese exports in 2024, first time exceeding 1 billion pounds
  • 800,000 head — Projected dairy heifer inventory decline through 2026-2027

Sources: USDA NASS, USDEC, CoBank Knowledge Exchange

What the Numbers Actually Tell Us

Let me walk through the data, because there’s a nuanced story here worth understanding.

U.S. dairy cows hit 4.30% butterfat in October—up from 4.08% just five years back.

That 5.4% increase in concentration doesn’t sound like much until you multiply it across 9.36 million cows producing roughly 226 billion pounds of milk a year. That’s a real shift in what’s going into bulk tanks nationally.

Now, it’s worth noting that October typically shows higher butterfat tests anyway—fall milk tends to run richer than summer production due to temperature effects on cow metabolism and feed intake patterns. But even accounting for seasonal variation, we’re seeing a structural increase that goes beyond normal fluctuation. The trend line has moved.

Protein’s held pretty steady at 3.30%, which brings us to what might be the most telling metric:

The protein-to-fat ratio has dropped to 0.77 — and that matters more than it might seem at first glance.

If you’ve spent any time around cheese operations—and many of you have—you know processors generally like to see that ratio closer to 0.82-0.84 for optimal standardization and yield. Dr. David Barbano over at Cornell has published extensively on this in the Journal of Dairy Science, and his milk standardization work documents these ranges pretty clearly.

When milk comes in heavy on fat relative to protein, plants have to adjust. Dr. John Lucey at the Center for Dairy Research in Madison describes it as “real operational adjustments at the plant level—not unmanageable, but it affects processing economics in ways that eventually work back through the value chain.”

I’ve heard similar things from cooperative procurement managers in the Upper Midwest. One large regional co-op’s field services director told me their standardization costs have increased noticeably over the past two years, which is starting to factor into component premium structure discussions at the board level. The genetic decisions we made five years ago are genuinely showing up in plant economics today. It’s worth being aware of.

The Timing Question—And the Ironic Twist in the 2025 Index Update

The Timing Trap: How Genetic Decisions Lag Market Reality by 5-7 Years

Here’s something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. Genetic selection success depends heavily on when decisions get made—not just what traits you’re selecting for.

And here’s where it gets really interesting—even our selection tools were caught in this timing paradox.

The April 2025 Net Merit $ revision, documented in USDA-AGIL’s technical report, actually increased emphasis on butterfat and decreased emphasis on protein compared to the 2021 formula. Why? Because NM$ economic weights are based on recent price trends—specifically, the previous three-year average. Butterfat prices from 2021-2024 averaged $2.88 per pound, well above the $2.10 forecast used in the 2021 index. Meanwhile, protein prices averaged only $2.27, below the $2.60 that had been projected.

The Ironic Index Trap: How April 2025’s NM$ Formula Emphasized Butterfat Just as Prices Fell

So the index that’s supposed to help us hedge against market uncertainty was itself responding to high butterfat prices—just as those prices were beginning to soften. The 2025 NM$ formula now places 31.8% relative emphasis on fat and only 13% on protein for Holsteins. There’s a certain irony in that timing.

This doesn’t mean NM$ is broken—far from it. The 2025 and 2021 formulas correlate at 0.992, meaning most animals rank similarly. But it does illustrate how even our best tools reflect backward-looking price data. Nobody’s crystal ball works perfectly.

Consider two groups of producers who approached genomics differently.

The early adopters—those who started genomic testing between 2010 and 2015—were operating in a different world entirely. Back then, reliability scores for production traits in young animals ranged from 41% to 50%. That’s from VanRaden’s foundational work in the Journal of Dairy Science. Better than parent average, sure, but with enough uncertainty that most folks spread their selection emphasis across multiple traits almost by necessity.

I was talking with a producer in southwest Wisconsin not long ago—a third-generation operation running about 650 Holsteins. “We started genomic testing in 2012 and were pretty conservative about it,” he told me. “The reliability numbers just weren’t high enough to justify betting heavy on any single trait. We focused on steady progress across the board.”

That approach, whether he planned it that way or not, positioned his herd well for different market scenarios. Including this one.

The more recent selectors—those making decisions in 2021-2023—faced different conditions. Genomic reliability had improved to 70-78% on young animals according to CDCB documentation. The tools were more precise. And butterfat prices were at historic highs. The economic signals seemed pretty clear.

Dr. Kent Weigel at UW-Madison, who’s done as much genomic selection research as anyone, puts it this way: “When you’re looking at butterfat premiums that high, and you’ve got genomic tools with that kind of reliability, the math seems obvious. The challenge is that nobody can reliably predict commodity prices five to seven years out. The genetics will do what the genetics do. Markets are another matter.”

Both approaches made sense given what people knew at the time. That’s important to acknowledge.

The Breed Diversity Conversation

There’s been more discussion lately about genetic diversity in Holsteins, and it deserves thoughtful consideration. Not alarm, not dismissal—just honest assessment.

The breed has achieved remarkable progress. CDCB’s periodic genetic base adjustments document substantial merit increases. That’s a real achievement, and we shouldn’t lose sight of it.

But that progress has come alongside increasing genetic concentration. Dr. Chad Dechow at Penn State has researched this extensively—his work in the Journal of Dairy Science shows Holstein inbreeding levels around 8% on average now, with young bulls running somewhat higher at 9-10%.

“What we’re seeing is the natural consequence of intense selection on a relatively narrow genetic base,” Dr. Dechow explains. “The bulls ranking highest on TPI and NM$ tend to be related to each other, so when everyone selects from the top of the list, inbreeding accumulates. It’s not a crisis yet, but it’s a trend worth monitoring.”

The Hidden Cost of Genetic Progress: Why Inbreeding Now Costs $23 Per Percentage Point Per Cow

It’s worth noting that we’re not alone in grappling with this. Dairy industries in New Zealand and across the EU have been addressing similar questions about genetic diversity within their own populations. The Dutch, in particular, have invested significantly in maintaining broader genetic bases in their Holstein-Friesian herds, and there’s been interesting research coming out of Wageningen on balancing selection intensity with diversity preservation. Different systems, different approaches—but the underlying challenge is universal when you’re selecting intensely from elite genetics.

The practical effects show up gradually. Published research from several groups—Pryce’s team in 2014 and Smith’s in 2019, both in the Journal of Dairy Science—has documented that each percentage point of inbreeding correlates with roughly 0.2-0.3 additional days in the calving interval. Not dramatic on its own. But it compounds over time, as many of us have seen.

What’s encouraging is that tools now exist to proactively manage this. CDCB publishes Expected Future Inbreeding scores through uscdcb.com that help identify high-merit genetics with less relationship to your existing herd. Several AI organizations have built mating programs around this. These are practical solutions for folks who want to stay ahead of the trend.

What Seems to Be Working

I’ve had a lot of conversations with producers and consultants across the Midwest and Northeast over the past year. Some patterns keep coming up among operations that seem to be navigating current conditions well.

Letting Economic Indices Do the Heavy Lifting

The operations that appear best positioned aren’t chasing whatever component pays best this month. They’re using economic indices—particularly Net Merit $—as their primary guide.

What makes NM$ useful is that USDA updates those economic weights periodically based on current conditions. Yes, those updates lag the market somewhat—as the April 2025 revision illustrates—but over time, the adjustments provide more systematic hedging than trying to guess where prices will be in five years.

A producer I know in Sheboygan County, Wisconsin—400-cow operation—made this shift about three years back. “We used to lean into whatever component was paying well,” he said. “Now we focus on NM$ and let the index handle the economic weighting. Our genetic progress has actually been more consistent.”

You hear variations of this story across different regions. California, Upper Midwest, Northeast—the specifics vary, but the principle holds.

Rethinking Replacement Economics

Here’s something that’s changed the math for a lot of operations—and it ties directly to one of the biggest structural shifts in our industry.

With heifer prices sustained at $3,000-$4,000 across many markets, herd turnover economics look dramatically different than they did five years ago. USDA data shows a 75% increase in heifer prices from April 2023 to mid-2025, moving from $1,720 per head to over $3,000—reaching unprecedented levels.

The driver? The beef-on-dairy trend has fundamentally reshaped our replacement pipeline. According to CoBank’s August 2025 analysis, dairy replacement heifer inventories have fallen to a 20-year low and could shrink by an estimated 800,000 head through 2026-2027 before beginning to recover. The National Association of Animal Breeders tracked the shift: of 9.7 million units of beef semen sold in 2024, 7.9 million went to dairy farmers—up from 5 million of 7.2 million units in 2020.

The Replacement Reckoning: How 800,000 Missing Heifers Reshape Genetic Strategy

The Financial Reality

Any genetic strategy conversation has to acknowledge what most of us are actually dealing with. Dairy farms generally run on tight margins with real debt service obligations. That’s just the reality.

Annual summaries consistently document substantial debt across dairy operations. When milk prices run in that $22-23 per cwt range—roughly where USDA forecasts have pointed for early 2025—margins support current operations but don’t leave much cushion for experiments.

Dr. Weigel acknowledges this: “You have to be realistic about financial constraints. The best genetic strategy doesn’t matter if it creates a cash flow problem. For most operations, the answer is gradual adjustment—incorporating diversity and health traits incrementally while maintaining production genetics that support current obligations.”

What seems to work is matching the strategy to your actual situation:

If you’ve got some balance sheet flexibility: Consider incorporating Expected Future Inbreeding scores in selection. Explore health trait emphasis. Build reserves that give you room to adjust.

If margins are tighter: Focus first on extending herd life to reduce replacement costs. Use economic indices rather than chasing component premiums. Address refinancing conversations while conditions are favorable.

Both approaches make sense—they just align with the circumstances.

(For more on this dynamic, see our previous coverage: “America’s 800,000-Heifer Crisis: How Chasing Beef Premiums Broke Our Replacement Pipeline“)

The calculation that keeps coming up: extending herd average from 2.2 to 2.5 lactations through improved fertility and health genetics can reduce heifer purchases by 10-15%. On a 500-cow operation, that potentially keeps $100,000-$150,000 annually in the business rather than flowing out for replacements.

The genetic tools to support this exist. Productive Life and Livability carry reasonable genomic reliability. The daughter pregnancy rate directly influences how long cows stay productive. It’s a different way of thinking about genetic investment—through cost reduction rather than just chasing more production.

Taking Health Traits Seriously

This is one area where the tools have really improved. Modern genomic evaluations include predictions for health traits that weren’t reliably measurable a decade ago. CDCB documentation shows mastitis resistance predictions now achieving around 40% reliability. Lower than production traits, sure, but meaningful enough for selection purposes.

Research from Canadian dairy genetics programs—including University of Guelph work in the Journal of Dairy Science—has documented that herds emphasizing health traits can achieve substantially lower lifetime antibiotic use alongside improved productive life. The economic benefit often runs $150-200 per cow annually when you factor in reduced vet costs and culling.

Dr. Filippo Miglior at Lactanet Canada sees this as the emerging opportunity: “Health traits are where I think we’ll see the most practical progress over the next decade. The genomic tools have become reliable enough for meaningful selection, and the economic payback is real even when it’s harder to see on individual milk checks.”

That resonates with what I’ve seen on farms.

The Export Picture—And Why Protein Is Becoming the Bottleneck

One more piece worth understanding, because it adds important context to the milk composition discussion.

U.S. cheese exports are on a historic run. According to the U.S. Dairy Export Council, 2024 set a new record at 508,808 metric tons—the first time ever exceeding 1 billion pounds. That’s 17% above the previous record set in 2022. As USDEC president Krysta Harden noted, “U.S. suppliers posted record-high cheese exports, strengthened their presence across Latin America, lifted U.S. dairy export value, and demonstrated their commitment to global markets.”

U.S. suppliers set records in several key markets in 2024, including Mexico, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean. Strong demand continues across Asia, particularly in Southeast Asian markets.

Here’s why this matters for milk composition: cheese production is protein-limited, not fat-limited. When we’re shipping record volumes of cheese overseas—and new processing capacity keeps coming online—protein becomes the bottleneck. Our current high-fat, relatively lower-protein milk actually creates challenges for exporters trying to maximize cheese output.

So while we’ve been genetically optimizing for butterfat premiums, the export market that’s driving so much of our growth needs protein. That’s not to say fat doesn’t matter—it absolutely does, especially for butter exports, which rebounded strongly in 2024 with AMF shipments more than doubling year-over-year according to USDEC data. But it does suggest that balanced milk composition may have more strategic value than we’ve been pricing in.

Dr. Mark Stephenson at UW-Madison, who directs dairy policy analysis, notes that “the export growth reflects genuine U.S. competitiveness on price and quality. Maintaining that position long-term depends partly on genetic resources—having flexibility to produce milk that meets diverse market specifications.”

As we compete globally, our ability to produce milk suited to different end uses becomes a competitive factor. Our genetic flexibility—or lack of it—shapes what market opportunities we can pursue.

Some Questions Worth Asking Yourself

As genetics selected in 2023-2024 move toward full expression in 2026-2028, there’s time to evaluate where you stand.

  • What’s happening with inbreeding in your herd? CDCB provides coefficients at uscdcb.com, and AI organizations often do herd-level analysis. If you’re trending toward 8-9%, it might be worth a conversation with your genetic advisor.
  • How balanced is your selection emphasis? Heavy concentration in any single area creates market exposure. Looking at where you stand across production, health, and fertility gives a useful perspective.
  • What’s your replacement rate telling you? Elevated involuntary culling often signals underlying fertility or health issues that compound over time. Sometimes it’s worth addressing root causes at the genetic level.
  • How dependent is your milk check on specific premiums? Understanding what happens if butterfat premiums compress further helps inform genetic emphasis going forward.

Looking Ahead

  • Timing matters as much as trait selection. That 5-7 year expression cycle means today’s decisions meet future conditions we can’t fully predict. October’s record butterfat illustrates this pretty clearly.
  • Even index formulas chase prices. The April 2025 NM$ update increased butterfat emphasis based on recent high prices—just as those prices were softening. It’s a reminder that all our tools are, to some degree, backward-looking.
  • Economic indices still offer systematic hedging. Despite their limitations, NM$ balances multiple trait values and adjusts as conditions change. Generally beats trying to forecast commodity prices years out on your own.
  • Breed diversity warrants attention. Progress has been remarkable, and tools exist to balance improvement with diversity maintenance. Expected Future Inbreeding scores make this practical.
  • The heifer shortage is real and structural. With replacements at 20-year lows and 800,000 fewer heifers projected through 2026-2027, extending productive life through genetics has never been more valuable.
  • Protein matters more than we’ve been pricing. Record cheese exports mean protein is increasingly the bottleneck. Balanced composition may have strategic value beyond what component premiums currently reflect.
  • Assessment time is now through 2026. Genetics selected will fully express in a few years. Evaluating your positioning while there’s time for adjustments makes sense.

The Bottom Line

Today’s genomic tools are genuinely more capable than anything we’ve had before. What experience keeps teaching us is that effective use requires careful consideration of timing, market uncertainty, and the development of genetic flexibility that works across different conditions. The producers who seem to navigate these cycles best tend to balance ambition with appropriate humility about what any of us can actually predict.

For ongoing coverage of genetic trends, market analysis, and practical strategies, visit www.thebullvine.com.

Resource Note

CDCB offers several free tools at uscdcb.com—Expected Future Inbreeding scores, individual inbreeding coefficients, and genetic evaluations across production, health, and fertility. Your AI rep can help interpret these for your situation. Most organizations can also pull a herd-level inbreeding trend report that shows where you’ve been heading over the past several breeding cycles.

Key Takeaways:

  • Timing beats genetics: The $3 butterfat genetics you selected in 2021-2022 are now producing into a $2.50 market—the 5-7 year cycle creates risk no breeding decision can fully hedge
  • Even the indices lag: April 2025’s Net Merit $ revision increased fat emphasis based on recent high prices—just as those prices softened. All tools look backward.
  • Productive life is the new ROI: Heifer inventories at 20-year lows and 800,000 fewer replacements through 2027 mean extending herd life now pays faster than chasing production gains
  • Protein is the emerging bottleneck: Record 2024 cheese exports—first year over 1 billion pounds—mean processors need balanced composition more than current component premiums suggest
  • Your window is now through 2026: Genetics selected today will fully express by 2028-2030. Assess your herd’s positioning while adjustment time remains.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Genetics
Tags : , , , , ,

What Lactalis’s 270-Farm Cut Really Means for Every Producer

Wednesday, November 12th, 2025

Only 11% of dairies under 300 cows are profitable. But three paths still work—if you move in the next 18 months.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Lactalis cutting 270 dairy farms while investing $11 billion in processing isn’t a contradiction—it’s the clearest signal yet that commodity milk is finished and component quality now rules everything. The stark reality: 89% of dairies over 1,000 cows are profitable while only 11% under 300 cows make money, and this isn’t about management skill—it’s structural economics you can’t overcome with hard work alone. Three converging crises (interest rates doubling to 8%, heifer inventory at 20-year lows, and labor costs up 73%) have compressed what was once a gradual 5-year industry shift into an urgent 18-month decision window. Every dairy faces three paths: invest $6.75-10.25 million to scale beyond 1,000 cows, transition to premium markets (organic/specialty) despite 3-year losses, or exit strategically while you can still preserve family wealth. Real farmers are already choosing—a Minnesota couple successfully scaled to 1,100 cows, Vermont neighbors transitioned to organic, and a Wisconsin family preserved $2.1 million through strategic sale. The difference between 3.6% and 4.2% butterfat is now worth $529,000 annually for a 500-cow operation, making component performance literally the difference between survival and closure. Your window to control this decision closes in 18 months—after that, circumstances decide for you.

You know, when Lactalis—the world’s largest dairy processor—announces they’re cutting 450 million liters and ending contracts with 270 French farmers, we should probably pay attention. I’ve been digging into this, talking with producers, looking at the numbers… and what’s interesting is this isn’t just another market cycle. We’re seeing something bigger here, something that’s going to affect all of us, whether we’re milking 50 cows or 5,000.

What I’ve found is that the traditional commodity dairy model—you know, the one most of us grew up with—it’s changing faster than anyone expected. And the timeline to adapt? Well, that’s gotten surprisingly short.

The 89/11 Rule reveals the stark reality: structural economics, not management quality, determines survival in modern dairy

Understanding Why Processors Are Making These Moves

So here’s what caught my attention in Lactalis’s 2024 financials: €30.3 billion in revenue, but only 1.2% net profit margins. That’s down from 1.45% the year before. Now compare that to their premium products—the yogurt division they bought from General Mills is generating 15-20% operating margins. Premium cheese? Consistently 8-12% margins.

Lactalis’s supply director explained in their October statement that the valuation of excess milk is often very low and subject to market volatility—language that really reflects how processors are viewing commodity markets these days. When a processor that size essentially says commodity milk isn’t worth the trouble… well, that’s not just complaining, is it?

FrieslandCampina’s been going through similar challenges. They’ve talked about timing mismatches—buying milk at one price, processing it, then having to sell into a lower market. That kind of volatility makes it really tough to plan, and shareholders don’t like uncertainty.

The Component Game Has Changed Everything

Component performance is now non-negotiable—volume alone won’t pay the bills anymore

I was talking with a Wisconsin producer last week—he’s running 650 cows near Fond du Lac—and he helped me understand just how much components have shifted the whole economics of dairy farming. USDA data from November shows butterfat now represents 58% of your milk check value, and protein adds another 31%. Think about that… 89% of your income comes from components, not volume.

His neighbors who consistently hit 4.23% butterfat compared to the regional average of 3.69%? They’re capturing about $4.60 more per hundredweight. For a 500-cow operation producing 23,000 pounds per cow annually, that works out to roughly $529,000 in additional revenue—though your actual numbers will vary with production levels and regional premiums, of course.

Cornell’s latest farm business data shows some interesting patterns:

  • The big operations—1,000+ cows—they’re hitting 4.0-4.3% butterfat with 3.3-3.5% protein pretty consistently
  • Mid-sized farms, say 300-500 cows, generally average 3.6-3.8% butterfat, 3.0-3.1% protein
  • And here’s what’s telling: large farms maintain about 2% daily variation in components while smaller operations see 5-10% swings

Now, getting those high components isn’t just about genetics. You need systematic management—a good nutritionist runs $80,000 to $120,000 a year, based on what I’m hearing. Feed testing programs add another $15,000 to $25,000. Those precision feeding systems? Dealers are quoting $250,000 to $500,000, depending on what you need.

The math gets tough for smaller operations. When you spread the combined cost of nutritionist, vet services, and consultants across a thousand-cow operation, it might come to $0.08-0.12 per hundredweight. But for a 200-cow farm? You’re looking at $0.40-$0.60 per hundredweight for the same level of professional support. That’s a huge competitive disadvantage.

Three Things Hitting Us All at Once

Cornell’s dairy economics team has been documenting what they’re calling a compressed decision timeline, and I think they’re onto something. Three things have converged, forcing us to make decisions faster than we’re used to.

Three converging crises compressed a gradual 5-year industry shift into an urgent 18-month decision window

Interest Rates Hit Like a Hammer

Federal Reserve data shows operating loan rates doubled—went from about 4% in 2021 to over 8% by late 2023. Haven’t seen rates like that in 20 years. A lender in Pennsylvania told me that operations that were barely profitable at 4% are now losing $3,000 to $5,000 monthly.

The Illinois farm management folks found that farms carrying significant debt saw interest costs per tillable acre jump from $33 to $60 in three years. That’s 82% more in fixed costs, and you can’t pass that along to your milk buyer.

What really concerns me is the Q3 2024 ag lending data—operating loan volumes are up over 30% for the third quarter in a row. A Wisconsin banker friend put it best: “This isn’t growth borrowing, it’s survival borrowing.”

The Heifer Shortage Nobody Saw Coming

CoBank’s August report lays out a fascinating situation—dairy heifer inventory’s at a 20-year low just when we need expansion for all this new processing capacity.

Here’s how we got here: the breeding data shows beef semen sales to dairy farms tripled from 2.5 million units in 2017 to 7.2 million by 2020. Last year? 7.9 million of the 9.7 million total units were beef semen.

Can’t blame anyone really. When beef calves were bringing $1,000 to $1,500 last October, while it costs $2,200 to $2,500 to raise a heifer worth maybe $1,600… the math was obvious. Problem is, we all did the same math at the same time.

CoBank thinks we’ll lose another 800,000 head before things turn around in 2027. An Idaho producer told me he’s been offered $3,200 for breeding-age heifers—if he had any. “Five years ago at $1,400, I had too many,” he said. “Now I can’t find them at any price.”

Labor Is Getting Impossible

Texas A&M’s 2024 research shows that immigrant workers make up 51% of dairy labor and milk 79% of our cows. Their models suggest losing that workforce would cut U.S. milk production by 48.4 billion pounds annually. That’s not a typo.

And it’s not just finding workers—it’s affording them. USDA data shows dairy wages went from $11.54 an hour in 2015 to $18-20 by 2024. A large operations manager in New Mexico told me they’re at $28 an hour when you factor in housing, benefits, and recruitment. “And we still can’t stay fully staffed,” he added.

Three Producers Who Found Their Way Through

Despite all these challenges, I’ve met several operations that have successfully navigating this transition. Let me share what they did differently.

Smart Scaling in Minnesota

There’s a couple in central Minnesota who expanded from 350 to 1,100 cows between 2019 and 2023. They saw their co-op’s base program would limit growth for mid-sized farms, so they moved early. Got financing at 3.5% before rates spiked, used sexed semen exclusively for three years to build internally, and partnered with an experienced Venezuelan family.

What’s smart is they expanded in phases over four years—each phase had to cash flow before they moved to the next. They’re now shipping butterfat at 4.1% consistently and have signed a five-year contract with a cheese plant 40 miles away. Their breakeven’s around $17.50 per hundredweight, so they’ve got a cushion even when markets get tough.

Going Organic in Vermont

A Vermont family with 480 cows went organic in 2021—right when everyone said that market was full. Key thing? They got Organic Valley’s commitment in writing before starting the transition. They lost $210,000 over three years, but off-farm income and some timber sales bridged the gap.

Today, they’re netting $3.80 per hundredweight after all costs. “We focused on keeping cows healthy and production steady rather than trying to expand during transition,” the son told me. They maintained 92% of conventional production throughout the transition—well above the 85% average.

Making the Tough Call in Wisconsin

This one’s harder to talk about. A couple near Eau Claire sold their 280-cow operation in March 2024 after recognizing they were in what economists call the 18-month window—sustained losses with limited options. At 58, with kids established off-farm, expanding to a competitive scale meant $6 million in new debt.

They sold into a strong cull market, leased the cropland to a neighbor, and kept the house and 40 acres. The husband’s now using his 30 years of experience as a co-op field rep. “I sleep better, my wife’s happier, and financially we’re ahead,” he told me. They preserved about $2.1 million in equity that probably would’ve disappeared if they’d hung on another year.

Where All This New Processing Investment Is Going

Processors already chose their future—understand their strategy to predict yours

IDFA announced $11 billion in new processing capacity, and where that money’s going tells you everything about industry direction. Their October breakdown shows:

  • Cheese gets $3.2 billion—32% of everything
  • Milk and cream processing: $2.97 billion—30%
  • Yogurt and cultured products: $2.81 billion—28%
  • Butter and spreads: $1.23 billion—12%

Three new cheese plants in the Texas Panhandle need 20 million pounds of milk daily by mid-2025. But these aren’t commodity operations—they’re component extraction facilities making mozzarella for export while capturing valuable whey proteins.

What they’re NOT building? Commodity powder plants or basic fluid bottling. A processing engineer in Wisconsin explained it well: “We’re maximizing value from every component now. Just removing water to make powder doesn’t cut it anymore.”

And here’s something else—up in the Northeast, a couple of smaller specialty cheese operations just expanded. They’re not huge, but they’re finding success focusing on local markets and agritourism. Different model entirely from the big Texas plants, but it shows there’s more than one way forward. Out in California’s Central Valley, I’m seeing similar patterns with artisan operations carving out niches even as the big players consolidate.

The Cooperative Evolution We Need to Talk About

This is uncomfortable for many of us, but cooperatives have changed dramatically since DFA was formed in 1998 through regional mergers. They now control 30% of U.S. milk production, and after buying 44 Dean Foods plants in 2020, they’re both the biggest milk marketer AND processor.

A former board member explained how this creates tension: “When your co-op owns processing plants, optimizing those facilities becomes as important as your milk check—sometimes more important.”

Base-excess programs show this complexity. Cornell’s research indicates these programs typically use your best three consecutive months over three years as “base.” Milk over that? You might pay penalties of $5 to $13.30 per hundredweight.

A Vermont producer shared his frustration: “We wanted to add 50 cows to get more efficient, but overbase penalties would’ve killed any benefit. We’re locked at the current size.”

Meanwhile, operations that were already large when base programs started? They’re fine. It’s the 300-cow farms trying to grow to 500 that get squeezed.

Your Three Paths Forward—Let’s Look at Real Numbers

Path Comparison at a Glance

FactorScale UpGo PremiumStrategic Exit
Investment$6.75-10.25M$210-275K lossesPreserve equity
Timeline4-5 years3-year transition8-10 months optimal
Success Rate~20%Varies by market100% if timed right
Key RiskDebt burdenMarket saturationWaiting too long

Extension economists from Cornell and Wisconsin show that farms with sustained losses typically face critical decisions within 12-18 months. So what are your actual options?

Path 1: Scale Up to Compete

Investment Required: $6.75-10.25 million total

  • Buildings and infrastructure: $3.5-5.0 million
  • Cattle at current prices: $2.25-3.0 million
  • Feed base expansion: $500,000-1.5 million
  • Working capital: $500,000-750,000

Success Rate: According to lending industry estimates, about 20% achieve projected returns. Key Factor: Usually need family money for unexpected challenges. Financing Options: USDA FSA offers beginning farmer programs and guaranteed operating loans through participating lenders, though eligibility and terms vary by operation and region. Some states also have specific dairy expansion programs worth exploring.

Path 2: Find Your Premium Market

Organic Transition Example:

  • Typical losses: $210,000-275,000 over 3 years
  • Pay organic feed prices (30-50% higher) while getting conventional prices
  • Need written buyer commitment before starting
  • Must maintain 85%+ production through transition

Potential Returns: $2.45/cwt net (vs. -$5.29 for conventional, based on USDA 2023 data). Reality Check: Most regions aren’t currently seeking new organic production. Alternative Options: Consider grassfed certification, A2A2 markets, or local/regional branding

Path 3: Strategic Exit While You Can

Timing Matters—Example for 300-cow operation with $2M debt:

Exit at 8-10 months:

  • Assets bring ~$4.65 million
  • After $2M debt and costs ($230,000-390,000): $2.26-2.42 million preserved

Forced sale at 16-18 months:

  • Assets bring ~$3.4 million (discounted)
  • After everything: $650,000-970,000 retained

The difference: Over $1.4 million in family wealth

Three paths still work—but only if you move in the next 18 months. After that, circumstances decide for you

The Technology Wave is Coming Fast

I attended the Protein Industries Summit in Chicago last month, and what I heard was eye-opening. McKinsey’s early 2025 biotech analysis shows precision fermentation has already hit cost parity for certain dairy proteins. Boston Consulting thinks these proteins will be five times cheaper than ours by 2030.

Here’s what’s already happening—Perfect Day’s animal-free whey is in Ben & Jerry’s ice cream right now. Not someday. Today. Fonterra’s partnerships with Superbrewed Food and Nourish Ingredients show where big players are heading. Fonterra indicated in its August 2024 announcements that ingredients from these technologies can be used alongside traditional dairy products. Translation: they’re building systems that can use proteins from cows or fermentation tanks—whatever’s cheaper.

And it’s not just startups anymore. I’m seeing major food companies quietly building fermentation capacity. They’re hedging their bets, preparing for a world where they can source proteins from multiple streams.

How This Hits Different Regions

This transformation affects regions differently, and understanding your local dynamics matters.

California: UC Davis research shows farms with less than 22% quota coverage pay more into the system than they get back. “We’re subsidizing the big quota holders,” a Tulare County producer told me.

Southeast: Maintains higher Class I fluid use—over 60% according to Federal Orders—which provides some buffer since processors need consistent daily deliveries. But even there, consolidation pressure is building.

Upper Midwest: All about cheese, so components rule everything. Wisconsin processors consistently tell me 4% butterfat is their practical minimum for preferred suppliers.

Plains States: Seeing aggressive expansion with new processing, but these plants want a minimum of 50,000+ pounds daily per farm. Can’t deliver that volume? You won’t get a contract.

Pacific Northwest: Interesting developments with smaller operations finding niches in farmstead cheese and direct marketing. Not for everyone, but it’s working for some.

Northeast: Beyond the specialty cheese operations, there’s also growth in agritourism and on-farm processing. Entirely different economics, but viable for the right location.

Western States: Water rights and environmental regulations adding another layer of complexity to expansion decisions.

Questions to Ask Yourself Right Now

Before you make any big decisions, honestly assess:

  • Are you covering all costs, including family living?
  • Can you achieve 4%+ butterfat consistently?
  • Do you have succession lined up?
  • What’s your debt-to-asset ratio?
  • Could you survive another year like 2023?
  • What would happen if you lost two key employees tomorrow?
  • Is your processor investing in commodity or specialty capacity?
  • Are there emerging environmental regulations that could affect you?

What This All Means for Your Planning

After looking at all this, here’s what I think matters most:

Component performance isn’t negotiable anymore. The difference between 3.6% and 4.2% butterfat can mean hundreds of thousands annually for a 500-cow operation. That fundamentally changes farm economics.

That 12-18 month window Cornell documented? It’s real. Interest rates, heifer availability, and labor costs compressed what used to be a multi-year adjustment into a much shorter period. Within the next 12-18 months—essentially by mid-2026, based on the timeline Cornell economists have documented—many operations will have made their choice, voluntarily or not.

Scale economics show clear breaks. USDA data showing 89% profitability for 1,000+ cow operations versus 11% for under 300 cows… that’s not about who’s a better manager. It’s structural advantages smaller operations can’t overcome.

Your processor’s strategy matters more than ever. If they’re investing in commodity powder, you’ve got time. If they’re building component extraction or specialty facilities, that tells you something different.

Technology adoption keeps accelerating. The Good Food Institute tracked $840 million in precision fermentation investment last year. Alternative proteins are moving from the experimental to the commercial stage faster than most of us expected.

Risk management tools—like Dairy Margin Coverage and Dairy Revenue Protection—might buy you time but won’t change the fundamental economics. They’re Band-Aids, not cures.

The Bottom Line

What Lactalis is doing—cutting 450 million liters while investing in premium capacity—makes sense when you understand their strategy. They’re consolidating relationships with farms that can deliver consistent, high-component milk at scale while preparing for fermentation-derived proteins.

The Minnesota couple who scaled smart, the Vermont family succeeding in organic, the Wisconsin couple who preserved wealth through planned exit—they all made different choices. But they shared a realistic assessment of where things are heading and made decisions accordingly.

For those of us still figuring out our path, an honest assessment of where we fit in this evolving structure is critical. Whether that means pursuing scale, finding premium markets, or planning transition, the key is making informed decisions while we still have options.

And if you’re wondering about the next generation—I talked with several young farmers recently. The ones succeeding are incredibly sharp, using technology in ways we never imagined, and they’re not afraid to try completely different models. That gives me hope, even as things change.

The dairy industry will keep producing milk—consumers guarantee that. But who produces it, how it’s valued, and what matters most? That’s changing fundamentally. Understanding where your operation fits in that transformation might be the most important analysis you do this year.

Because waiting for things to “go back to normal”? Well, I think we all know that ship has sailed.

The Bullvine provides ongoing analysis and resources at www.thebullvine.com. Cornell’s Dairy Markets and Policy program and Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Profitability offer valuable planning tools. The producer experiences shared here reflect confidential discussions, with identifying details modified for privacy.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • You Have 18 Months to Decide: Cornell economists confirm sustained losses trigger forced decisions within this window—control your choice now or lose that option forever
  • Three Paths Still Work: Scale to 1,000+ cows ($6.75-10.25M investment, 20% success rate) | Go premium (organic/A2/grassfed, 3-year transition) | Exit strategically (preserves $1.4M more than waiting)
  • Components = Survival: The 0.6% butterfat difference between average and top herds is worth $529,000/year, and processors are making this gap the entry requirement
  • The 89/11 Rule: 89% of 1,000+ cow dairies profit while only 11% under 300 cows survive—this is structural economics, not management quality
  • Processors Already Chose: They’re investing $11B in component extraction while cutting commodity suppliers—understand their strategy to predict your future

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

Why Your Milk Check Makes No Sense Anymore (And How Smart Farms Are Adapting)

Sunday, November 2nd, 2025

Butter inventories: lowest since 2016. Butter prices: falling fast. Your milk check: shrinking. We connect the dots.

Executive Summary: Something broke in dairy markets this October: butter crashed to $1.60 despite the tightest inventories since 2016. Just 15 CME trades triggered the drop, opening a massive $2.47 gap between Class III and Class IV milk prices—the widest since 2011. Jersey farms shipping to butter plants now lose up to $500,000 annually, while Holstein neighbors shipping to cheese plants gain from the exact same market. Why? Algorithmic trading dominates these thin markets, punishing the high butterfat we spent decades breeding for. Smart farms are adapting fast: switching processors (6-month payback), negotiating collectively ($0.35/cwt gains), and even reducing butterfat through nutrition. The message is clear—understand these new market dynamics or get left behind.

I was chatting with a Jersey producer near Mondovi, Wisconsin—been in the business 28 years—and he told me something that’s really stuck with me. “For the first time,” he said, “I genuinely don’t understand what’s driving my milk check.”

That’s a powerful statement coming from someone who’s weathered every market cycle since the mid-90s. And he’s not alone. I’ve been hearing similar frustrations from producers all across the dairy belt lately, from the Great Lakes down through Texas.

October 2025 just matched the worst Class spread since 2011—and this time, it’s not a temporary spike. The fundamentals driving this gap are structural, not cyclical. When pricing signals stay broken this long, farms that wait for ‘normal’ to return are making a dangerous bet.

Why Are Butter Prices Falling When Inventories Are Tight?

So here’s what happened this October that’s got everyone talking. According to CME Group’s daily reports, spot butter prices fell from $1.6950 in mid-September to $1.6025 on October 9th. Pretty significant drop.

But what makes this genuinely puzzling is what else was happening. USDA’s Cold Storage report, released September 24th, showed butter inventories at 305.858 million pounds for August. That’s the tightest August inventory we’ve seen since 2016.

Tight inventories should support prices, shouldn’t they? That’s how it’s always worked. But not this time.

Here’s what’s keeping me up at night. August 2025 butter inventories sit at 305.9 million pounds—the tightest since 2016. Basic economics says tight supplies mean higher prices. Instead, butter crashed to $1.60. That’s not a market signal. That’s market failure. And your breeding decisions for the last decade just became a liability because algorithms don’t care about supply and demand.

And the timing… October is traditionally when we see butter prices strengthen. Retailers start building holiday inventory, and demand picks up through Thanksgiving. We’ve all seen that pattern. This October? Complete opposite.

What’s particularly interesting is the global picture. While our butter was trading around $1.60 in early October, industry reports suggest European prices were holding near $2.60 per pound. New Zealand’s Global Dairy Trade auction from October 1st showed butter equivalent prices in the $3.40 to $3.50 range after conversion.

That’s a massive disconnect. And according to USDA Foreign Agricultural Service data through August, it’s been driving butterfat exports way above last year’s levels—increases of over 200% in some months. You’d think that kind of export demand would support domestic prices, but apparently not in this market.

The recent trade agreements, particularly USMCA provisions, have actually made cross-border dairy movement easier, which you’d expect would help price discovery. But even with those improvements, we’re seeing these wild disconnects.

How Can 15 Trades Set Prices for an Entire Industry?

At a recent University of Wisconsin Extension meeting, several producers raised good questions about how these price movements could occur with such thin trading volume. Let me walk you through what I’ve been observing.

On October 9th, CME’s daily report showed selling pressure that drove prices down 4.75 cents in just one session. We’re talking about spot loads of 40,000 pounds each, and on a busy day, maybe 15 loads change hands. That’s 600,000 pounds of butter, setting the tone for an industry producing 1.8 billion pounds of milk daily, according to USDA production statistics.

Academic research increasingly suggests electronic trading has fundamentally changed these markets. A good chunk of trading volume in futures markets now comes from algorithmic systems rather than traditional commercial hedging. It’s not farmers hedging production or cheese plants covering forward needs anymore—it’s computers trading momentum patterns.

You can actually see it in the data. Days when butter prices drop sharply often show heavier volume—maybe 12 to 15 loads trading. But when prices try to recover? Volume frequently drops to just 5 or 6 loads. That’s not normal commercial hedging, where you’d expect consistent volume regardless of price direction.

The Class III/IV spread really tells the story. USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service data showed that spread widening to $2.47 per hundredweight on October 9th—the largest gap since 2011. Class III milk for cheese was $17.01, while Class IV milk for butter-powder was $14.54.

In a market where butter supplies are supposedly tight, that kind of spread doesn’t make fundamental sense. I’ve been in this industry long enough to remember when a 50-cent spread was considered wide. Now we’re looking at nearly $2.50.

Who’s Getting Hit Hardest—And Who’s Finding Solutions?

What I’ve found eye-opening is how differently this affects farms depending on location and milk destination.

There’s a Wisconsin Jersey producer I work with—let’s call him Tom—who runs about 480 cows, averaging 4.8% butterfat. Beautiful production numbers. Based on Federal Order 30 component pricing, his milk should be worth significantly more than the Holstein operation down the road, which is testing at 3.8% fat.

Let’s talk real numbers. That 1,000-cow Jersey operation your family built over three generations? You’re bleeding $600,000 annually at today’s Class spread—that’s $50,000 monthly straight off the top. Meanwhile, your Holstein neighbor with the same 500 cows loses only $75,000. For the first time in dairy history, the genetics we told you to breed for are costing you a quarter-million dollars a year. And it’s not temporary

But when he’s shipping to a butter-powder plant and that Class III/IV spread hits $2.47 per hundredweight, that advantage completely reverses.

Using calculation tools from UW-Madison’s Center for Dairy Profitability (excellent resources at cdp.wisc.edu), we can quantify this. A 100-cow Jersey operation faces nearly $60,000 less income annually under these conditions. Mid-size farms with 300 cows could be down about $175,000. That 500-cow operation? Close to $300,000 annually. And if you’re running 1,000 head? Over half a million dollars in lost revenue.

These are real losses affecting real families. We’re not talking about missed opportunities here—we’re talking about actual cash flow gaps that affect everything from feed purchases to equipment payments.

But here’s what’s encouraging—creative solutions are emerging all over. A producer group in Pennsylvania negotiated a shift from shipping to a butter-powder plant to accessing a cheese cooperative. They invested in equipment upgrades to meet new specs, but told me the investment paid for itself within six months once they escaped that Class IV pricing penalty.

In California, more operations are exploring value-added opportunities. Farmstead cheese, on-farm processing, direct sales. It requires significant capital and a different business model, but those making it work see premiums of $3 to $5 more per hundredweight over commodity pricing.

And in the upper Midwest, I recently visited a 650-cow operation near La Crosse that’s taking a different approach. They’ve partnered with two neighboring farms to collectively negotiate milk marketing, giving them leverage they wouldn’t have individually. “We’re still shipping Class IV,” the owner told me, “but we negotiated quality premiums that offset about 40% of the spread disadvantage.”

Down in Texas, where I was last month, producers face different challenges. The heat stress on butterfat production actually works in their favor when these spreads widen—their naturally lower butterfat levels mean less exposure to the Class IV penalty. One producer near Stephenville told me, “We used to curse our 3.5% fat tests in summer. Now it’s actually protecting us from worse losses.”

I’ve also been talking with Holstein producers who are navigating this differently. A 1,200-cow operation in Michigan shared its strategy—they’ve actually benefited from maintaining moderate butterfat levels around 3.7% while focusing on volume. “Everyone was chasing components,” the owner explained, “but we stuck with balanced production. Now that’s paying off.”

And it’s not just Jerseys and Holsteins feeling this. A Brown Swiss producer in Vermont mentioned their breed’s protein-to-fat ratio has actually become an advantage in this market. “We naturally produce closer to what processors want,” she said. Even some Guernsey operations with their golden milk are finding niche markets that value their unique component profile beyond commodity pricing.

Why Did Everyone Breed for Butterfat If This Was Coming?

Looking at USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service data from 2014 forward, butterfat prices beat protein prices in eight of ten years through 2024. The whole industry was singing the same tune—breed for components, maximize butterfat.

I remember reading CoBank’s November 2023 report titled “The Butterfat Boom Has Just Begun.” They documented that butter consumption grew 43% over 25 years, and that cheese was up 46%; according to USDA Economic Research Service data, Americans now eat about 42 pounds of cheese per person annually. Double what we ate in 1975.

But by September 2024, CoBank published a follow-up with a different tone, warning that butterfat production might be growing too fast. According to analysis from CoBank and other industry sources, the protein-to-fat ratio in U.S. milk has shifted. It held steady around 0.82-0.84 for nearly two decades, but recent data suggests we’re now closer to 0.77.


Metric		JerseyHolstein
Milk Production18,000 lbs/yr25,000 lbs/yr
Butterfat4.8%3.8%
Feed Efficiency1.75 ECM/lb1.67 ECM/lb
Feed Cost per lb Fat$1.82$1.97
Normal Market-$456/yr$0
At $2.47 Spread-$956/yr$0

​I recently spoke with a cheese plant manager in Central Wisconsin who explained their perspective. “We’re not trying to penalize high-butterfat milk,” he said, “but our process is optimized for certain ratios. When milk comes in with too much fat relative to protein, we’ve either got to add milk protein concentrate—which isn’t cheap—or skim off cream. Either way, it’s an added cost.”

This seasonal component shift matters too. Spring flush typically brings lower components as cows transition to pasture—you know how it goes, that first lush grass drops butterfat like a rock. We’d normally see fat tests drop from 4.0% to 3.6% or lower in grazing herds. Then, fall milk traditionally shows higher butterfat as cows return to TMR and corn silage.

But with year-round confinement becoming standard in larger operations, these seasonal patterns are flattening. A nutritionist I work with in Idaho told me that their 5,000-cow clients now maintain 3.8% butterfat year-round, plus or minus 0.1%. That consistency sounds good, but processors built their systems around predictable seasonal variation. Now they’re scrambling to adjust.

What Can You Actually Do About This Right Now?

Risk management has become essential. Looking at CME quotes in late October, Class IV put options at the $14.00 strike were trading around $0.15 per hundredweight. That’s affordable insurance—maybe 6% of what you’d lose if prices really tank. Worth discussing with your milk marketing cooperative.

On the feed side, December corn futures were trading near $4.19 per bushel in early November. Given where feed markets have been, locking in at least some costs makes sense. When milk pricing is this volatile, having one side of your margin equation fixed helps you sleep at night.

Stop waiting for the market to fix itself—here are five strategies working right now on real farms. The Pennsylvania group switching to cheese plants? Six-month payback and they’re adding $2/cwt every month since. The Ohio farm reducing butterfat through nutrition? Four months to breakeven. And locking December corn at $4.19? That’s protecting your margin TODAY. These aren’t theory—these are survival tools farms are using while others are still wondering what happened.

Marketing flexibility is crucial, though limited for many. But it’s worth exploring whether you could shift even a portion of milk to different processors. Some regions have more options than folks realize—cooperatives and plants not considered because they’ve been shipping to the same place for decades.

A Northeast producer recently shared something interesting—they partnered with neighboring farms to collectively negotiate better terms with processors. Not feasible everywhere, but where geographic concentration allows, collaborative approaches deserve consideration. They told me payback on legal and consulting fees took eight months, but they’re now seeing $0.35 more per hundredweight.

I’ve also been seeing increased interest in adjusting components through nutrition. A farm in Ohio began working with its nutritionist to moderate butterfat production, reducing it from 4.1% to 3.85% through ration adjustments. Sounds counterintuitive after years of pushing components higher, but when that Class IV spread is wide, it can actually improve their milk check.

For those with Dairy Margin Coverage through FSA, it’s worth revisiting your coverage levels. The program calculations don’t fully capture these Class III/IV spread impacts, but higher coverage levels might provide some cushion when markets get this disconnected. With crop insurance interactions, some producers are finding ways to layer their risk protection more effectively.

Is This How Dairy Pricing Works Now?

October’s butter price action reveals fundamental questions about how dairy prices get discovered in modern markets.

When CME spot markets with thin daily volume—sometimes just a dozen trades—determine pricing for over 90% of U.S. milk production, the traditional relationship between supply and demand can become distorted.

Other commodities have addressed similar issues. The beef and pork industries implemented mandatory price reporting years ago, where packers report transactions to the USDA, creating broader datasets for price discovery. Some in dairy are asking whether we need something similar. Organizations like the National Milk Producers Federation have begun discussing potential reforms, and there’s growing support from state organizations as well.

The Canadian system offers an interesting contrast. They operate under supply management with administered pricing through the Canadian Dairy Commission. Their system has its own challenges—less export opportunity, higher consumer prices—but price volatility isn’t one of them. Canadian producers maintained stable component premiums throughout October while we dealt with wild swings.

Where Do We Go from Here?

Based on everything I’m seeing and hearing across the industry, here’s what we need to keep in mind:

Traditional price signals might not mean what they used to. When butter prices fall despite the USDA showing the tightest inventories in years, market structure issues go beyond normal supply and demand.

Component strategies need evolution. The protein-to-fat ratio processors want has shifted, and breeding programs might need adjustment. That feels like abandoning years of genetic progress, but markets change. The Jersey breeders I know are already talking about selecting for more moderate butterfat—targeting 4.5% instead of pushing toward 5%. Holstein operations that maintained balanced components are suddenly looking smart. Brown Swiss and Guernsey breeders are reassessing their component targets in response to processor feedback.

Risk management isn’t optional anymore. Even basic strategies like put options provide crucial downside protection. If you’re not working with someone on this, it’s time to start.

Mid-size commodity operations face the most pressure. You need either scale advantages of large operations or premium markets that reward quality differently than commodity channels.

I know this is challenging to process. Many built operations based on signals the market sent for over a decade—maximize components, breed for butterfat, invest in genetics. Now the market’s sending different signals, and adapting isn’t easy.

But dairy farmers are incredibly resilient. We’ve weathered droughts, surpluses, price crashes, and policy changes. This market structure challenge? It’s serious, but not insurmountable.

What encourages me is the innovative responses nationwide. Producers exploring new marketing arrangements, investigating value-added opportunities, and approaching risk management with fresh perspectives. A young producer in Minnesota recently told me, “My grandfather adapted when bulk tanks replaced milk cans. My father adapted when computers changed breeding programs. Now it’s my turn to figure out these new market dynamics.”

That perspective—acknowledging change while maintaining confidence—that’s exactly right.

October’s butter price action, with spot prices at $1.60 while inventories sit at six-year lows according to USDA data, shows the old rules might not apply. Understanding these new dynamics—electronic trading’s role, thin-market impacts, and the importance of component ratios—that’s crucial for smart decisions going forward.

The question isn’t whether markets return to the old ways. They probably won’t. It’s how quickly we adapt strategies to thrive where market structure matters as much as production efficiency.

We’ll figure it out. We always do. That’s what dairy farmers do—adapt, persevere, find a way forward. This time won’t be different.

For those interested in risk management tools, reach out to your cooperative or check CME Group’s educational resources. The University of Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Profitability has excellent free tools for analyzing component pricing impacts at cdp.wisc.edu. Regional extension services provide valuable market analysis and decision-support resources tailored to local conditions. Organizations like the National Milk Producers Federation (nmpf.org) and your state dairy associations are actively working on market reform proposals worth following.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Your milk check isn’t broken—the market is: 15 CME trades (600,000 lbs) now set prices for 1.8 billion lbs daily production
  • High butterfat became a liability overnight: Jersey farms lose $500K/year at current Class III/IV spreads ($2.47/cwt) while moderate-component Holsteins gain
  • Three farms found solutions that work: Pennsylvania group switched processors (6-month payback), Wisconsin neighbors negotiated together (+$0.35/cwt), Ohio farm reduced fat through nutrition (4.1% to 3.85%)
  • Risk protection costs less than you think: Class IV puts at $14 strike cost $0.15/cwt—that’s $450/month for a 500-cow dairy
  • This isn’t temporary: Algorithmic trading owns these markets now—farms still breeding for maximum butterfat are planning for yesterday’s market

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

Forget Volume: China’s 18% Premium Surge Means $150,000+ More for Component-Focused Farms – But the Window Closes Fast

Friday, October 31st, 2025

The surprising market shift that’s making component quality more valuable than volume—and what producers are learning about the 3-5 year window ahead

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: China’s premium dairy surge is handing component-focused producers $150,000-$200,000 in extra annual revenue—no expansion required. While premium imports rocket up 18%, commodity imports are tanking 12%, creating a historic quality-over-quantity shift driven by 670 million Chinese middle-class consumers who prioritize safety and nutrition over price. Here’s the critical part: the 3-5 year window to lock in premium supplier status is already 40% gone, with October 2025 marking a crucial decision point. Producers implementing targeted nutrition changes see results in 12-18 months, while genomic improvements take 36-48 months—both achievable before the 2027 market saturation deadline. Right now, component-optimized milk commands $24/cwt versus $18 for commodity, a $6 gap that represents survival versus thriving. Bottom line: farms that pivot to components this winter will count premium checks in 2026, while volume-chasers will still be wondering what happened when the window slams shut.

You know, last week I was going through Chinese customs data, and something really caught my attention. China’s economy is slowing down to 4.6% GDP growth—we all know that story. But here’s what’s interesting… their dairy import patterns are telling a completely different tale, one that’s got progressive American producers rethinking how they value every pound of milk in the bulk tank.

So the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service released its May 2025 report, showing that China’s overall dairy imports grew by about 6% through September. Not bad, nothing spectacular. But when you dig into the specific categories—and this is where it gets really fascinating—premium dairy products are advancing nearly 18% year-over-year while commodity products are retreating around 12%, based on what we’re seeing in Chinese customs data and the latest Tridge market analysis. For those of us who’ve built our operations around maximizing volume for generations, well… this divergence is something we need to talk about.

Component-optimized milk commands $24/cwt versus $18 for commodity—a $6 gap that separates profitable farms from struggling ones. Right now, this premium represents the difference between counting checks in 2026 or wondering what happened.

What the latest customs reports are showing is cheese imports rising 13.5% and butter—get this—surging 72.6% year-over-year. Meanwhile, skim milk powder? That’s heading the other direction. I’ve been talking with dairy market analysts who’ve tracked this stuff for the past decade, and they’re telling me this isn’t just another market fluctuation. It looks like we’re seeing a fundamental shift in what the world’s largest dairy import market actually values.

Butter imports to China exploded 73% while skim milk powder declined 8%—proof that premium components crush commodity volume. Chinese consumers are voting with their wallets for quality over quantity.

“The premium shift isn’t temporary—it’s structural. Producers who position themselves now will capture long-term value that commodity markets simply can’t match.”

And here’s what really makes you think… China’s middle class is continuing to expand—the USDA projects they’ll add 80 million people by 2030—and we’re observing similar patterns across Southeast Asia, India, and parts of Africa, according to Rabobank’s December 2024 analysis. What I’ve found is this could represent the most meaningful value shift in global dairy markets we’ve seen in decades.

China’s dairy market is splitting in two—premium products rocket up 18% while commodity imports crater 12%. This historic quality-over-quantity shift represents survival versus thriving for global dairy exporters.

Understanding What’s Really Driving This Premium Shift

When you look at the forces reshaping China’s dairy demand, they actually make a lot of sense—wealth creation, food safety consciousness, evolving consumer preferences. Understanding these drivers helps explain why this shift feels different from the usual market cycles we’ve all ridden out before.

The Food Safety Factor That Won’t Go Away

It’s been seventeen years since that 2008 melamine incident—the World Health Organization reports documented six infant deaths and 300,000 illnesses. Yet Chinese consumers still show a strong preference for imported dairy products, especially when it comes to their kids. The China Dairy Industry Association’s data shows imports of infant formula increased from 28% of dairy imports in 2008 to 45% by 2019.

What’s particularly telling—and this surprised me—is that premium infant formula now represents 37% of market share, up from 32.8% just a year ago, according to July 2025 market research from Innova. The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences recently published consumer research showing Chinese consumers prioritize nutritional value at 59%, quality at 45%, and safety at 39%. Price? That ranks at just 6% when they’re selecting a formula. That preference hierarchy creates real pricing opportunities for suppliers who can demonstrate superior quality and traceability.

How Middle Class Growth Changes Everything

The scale here is… well, it’s something else. China’s middle class expanded from 3.1% of the population in 2000 to 50.8% in 2018, according to McKinsey Global Institute data. We’re talking about roughly 670 million people joining the ranks of consumers with discretionary income. The National Bureau of Statistics of China reports per capita income grew at a 6.1% compound annual rate from 2019 to 2024, reaching 41,300 RMB—that’s about $5,792 annually.

What I’m seeing in the consumption data is these folks aren’t looking for the cheapest option on the shelf. They want Western-style products with clear quality differentiation. USDA estimates show cheese consumption alone could hit 495,000 metric tons by 2030, growing at a 9.1% compound annual rate. And here’s the kicker—60 to 75% is being consumed in foodservice settings like Western restaurants and pizza chains.

Why China Can’t Make These Premium Products Themselves

This caught me off guard when I first looked into it. China aims to achieve 75% dairy self-sufficiency under its 14th Five-Year Plan, but its domestic production focuses mainly on fluid milk and basic dairy products. The USDA’s May 2025 China dairy report shows Chinese farms are actually reducing output—down 0.5% in 2024 with another 1.5% decline forecast for 2025—as farmgate prices hit decade lows around 3.20 RMB per kilogram.

But here’s the real issue… China lacks the processing infrastructure for specialty cheese production, premium protein concentrates, and other high-value categories. The USDA report notes that while “domestic cheese production will increase gradually, with growing investment in natural cheese capacity,” current production is just 30,000 MT, compared to 178,000 MT imported.

Dr. Leonard Polzin from the University of Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Profitability calls this “structural import dependency” for premium products—and it’s likely to persist given the technical expertise and infrastructure requirements. Makes sense when you think about it.

How Payment Systems Shape Who Wins in Export Markets

What’s really revealing about the competition between major dairy exporters is how payment structures influence what farmers produce, which ultimately determines export success. New Zealand is capturing 46% of China’s dairy imports? That’s not luck—it’s directly tied to how they pay farmers.

The Fonterra Approach Makes You Think

So Fonterra pays farmers solely on the basis of kilograms of milk solids—butterfat plus protein. Water? Doesn’t matter. Lactose? Not counted. Their 2025/26 forecast, announced in May, stands at $10.00 NZD per kilogram of milk solids.

Research published this year by dairy economics specialists shows the New Zealand payment system essentially discourages chasing volume. When volume isn’t the main metric, farmers naturally optimize for component density instead of pushing cows for maximum daily production. It’s a different mindset entirely.

What I find interesting is how this payment structure aligns farmer incentives with premium market demand almost automatically. When Chinese buyers want high-protein cheese or concentrated dairy ingredients, New Zealand farmers are already producing that milk profile—not specifically for exports, but because that’s what their payment system rewards.

Where American Payment Systems Create Challenges

And this is where it gets tricky for us. Most American cooperatives still use volume-focused payment systems with base prices per hundredweight, treating component premiums as add-ons rather than the main event. This creates an interesting situation—we’re optimizing for volume because that’s what payment systems reward most directly, even as global markets increasingly value component density.

Cornell University’s 2020 research on payment structures, led by Dr. Chris Wolf, found something eye-opening: non-cooperative handlers allocated 37% of premiums to quality incentives, while cooperatives allocated just 18% to quality. As the research shows, some cooperatives reward production excellence while others… well, they basically reward showing up.

“We spent decades asking, ‘How much milk can we ship?’ Now we ask, ‘How much value can we create?’ That change in thinking transformed everything about our operation—and our future.”

Learning from European Approaches

What’s interesting is looking at how European producers handle this. In the Netherlands, FrieslandCampina’s payment system includes substantial sustainability and quality bonuses that can add up to 15% to the base price. German cooperatives like DMK have shifted toward value-based pricing models that reward both components and environmental metrics. These systems took years to implement, but they’re now seeing the payoff in premium export markets.

What Progressive Producers Are Learning

I’ve been talking with forward-thinking dairy operations across the country, and many aren’t waiting around for payment system reform. They’re discovering that transitioning from volume to value can happen faster than we’ve traditionally thought—often with pretty encouraging financial results.

The Nutrition Strategy That Works Right Now

A Wisconsin producer I spoke with recently—runs about 500 cows near Eau Claire—told me something interesting: “We figured component improvement would take years, but our nutritionist showed us we could see real changes within a single lactation cycle.”

Based on Penn State Extension research and field trials across the Midwest, here’s what’s delivering results:

  • Amino acid balancing targeting 6.5-7.2% lysine and 2.4-2.6% methionine in metabolizable protein: University of Wisconsin trials show 0.1-0.2% protein increases are worth approximately $71,000 annually for a 500-cow operation
  • Fatty acid supplementation using rumen-protected fats: Michigan State research demonstrates 0.2-0.3% butterfat increases valued at $98,000+ annually
  • Forage quality optimization, maintaining 26-32% neutral detergent fiber: Cornell studies confirm this supports efficient rumen fermentation for better component production

Dr. Mike Hutjens, Professor Emeritus of Animal Sciences at the University of Illinois—he’s worked with dozens of component-focused operations—tells me farms are capturing $150,000 to $200,000 in additional annual revenuethrough nutrition changes alone, before even touching genetics.

How Genomics Accelerates the Timeline

The genomic testing revolution has really changed the game here. Chad Ryan, genetic programs manager at Select Sires, puts it this way: “What used to take 6-7 years now happens in 36-48 months for herds committed to change.”

The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding reports that as of April 2025, the average Holstein heifer calf produces 45 more pounds of butterfat and 30 more pounds of protein annually compared to one born in 2015—purely through genetic selection. That’s progress.

Strategic Approaches by Farm Size

Through conversations with producers nationwide, it’s becoming clear that farms of every size can access premium value—though the best strategies vary quite a bit based on scale, location, and market access. Now, not every region has equal access to premium processors—let’s be honest about that—but opportunities are expanding faster than many folks realize.

Mid-Size Operations (300-800 cows): Finding the Balance

These operations often have that nice combination of enough scale for efficiency while maintaining flexibility to adapt. A producer milking 550 cows near Green Bay shared this with me: “We’re big enough to matter to processors but small enough to pivot when we need to.”

Wisconsin’s Department of Agriculture reports that operations focusing on cheese-quality milk are seeing annual revenue increases of $150,000-$200,000 through component optimization. You know what’s interesting about this size operation? They can often implement changes faster than larger dairies while still having enough volume to negotiate favorable terms with processors.

Large Operations (1,500+ cows): Leveraging Scale

California’s larger dairies are taking a different approach. A manager running a 2,100-cow operation in Tulare County explained their strategy: “We provide consistent, high-volume premium supply for export contracts.”

What I’ve noticed with these larger operations is that they’re often dealing with tighter margins per cow, so even small percentage improvements in components can make a huge difference to the bottom line. And with California’s ongoing water challenges and environmental regulations, maximizing value per gallon of water used is becoming critical.

Small Family Farms (Under 200 cows): The Niche Advantage

What’s been really encouraging—and honestly, kind of surprising—is how smaller farms are finding lucrative opportunities in specialty markets. A Pennsylvania family running 165 cows who switched to A2 production three years ago now gets $24 per hundredweight. “Would’ve seemed impossible five years ago,” they told me.

Penn State Extension specialist Lisa Holden confirms what we’re seeing: “Small farms using modern management systems are proving that farmstead-scale operations can achieve competitive margins. The key is identifying and serving premium niches that value authenticity and story alongside quality.”

The Window of Opportunity—And Its Limits

Dr. Mary Ledman, global dairy strategist at Rabobank, sees a clear but limited window here. “Producers have about 3-5 years to establish themselves as premium suppliers before market saturation occurs,” she explained at a recent industry conference. “China’s premium import growth won’t stay at 18% forever.”

What makes this particularly compelling is that nine out of ten emerging markets—Southeast Asia, India, Africa—are reporting double-digit gains in premium dairy demand according to IFCN Dairy Research Network data. Southeast Asia’s dairy market alone is projected to grow at 7-8% annually through 2030, according to FAO projections.

But let’s be realistic here. Not every producer has convenient access to premium processors. Transition costs can be substantial upfront. And yeah, there’s risk in shifting away from what’s worked for generations. Plus, with the way weather patterns have been changing—we all saw what happened with the flooding in California’s Central Valley last spring—maintaining consistent component levels through environmental challenges adds another layer of complexity.

Practical First Steps You Can Take

Based on everything I’ve learned researching this shift, here’s what I’d suggest doing in the next 30 days:

Week 1: Figure Out Where You Stand

  • Calculate your average components from the past year (and compare them seasonally—summer depression is real)
  • Compare your payment structure to what others in your region are getting
  • Identify processors in your area who pay component premiums

Week 2: Look at Nutrition Options

  • Set up a meeting with your nutritionist about amino acid balancing
  • Get quotes for rumen-protected fat supplements
  • Test your current forage quality—NDF digestibility, particle size, the works

Week 3: Explore Your Market

  • Call three specialty processors or cheese makers within reasonable hauling distance
  • Research what certifications the premium markets in your area require
  • Talk with your cooperative about their export programs and premium opportunities

Week 4: Build Your Plan

  • Set component targets for the next 12 months
  • Budget for genomic testing of heifer calves
  • Pick your first step—nutrition usually offers the quickest payback

Where This All Leads—And Why Time Matters Now

Looking at everything together—the data, what producers are experiencing, where markets are heading—this shift from volume to value in global dairy markets isn’t just talk anymore. It’s happening right now, and we’re seeing clear differences between those adapting and those holding steady.

What really strikes me is how China’s market is basically showing us the future. That surge of nearly 18% in premium dairy imports, while commodity products decline around 12%? That’s not just noise. We’re seeing similar patterns across emerging markets—FAO, Rabobank, and IFCN are all documenting this—which creates multiple opportunities for well-positioned suppliers.

I’ll be straight with you—the window for action feels tighter than many producers might expect. Those who establish premium positioning in the next 3-5 years will likely lock in long-term contracts and relationships. If we look at historical patterns in agricultural markets, waiting for others to prove the model usually means competing for whatever’s left in increasingly crowded markets.

And here’s the thing that should really get your attention: we’re already ten months into 2025. If that 3-5 year window started when these trends became clear in early 2024, we’re already approaching the halfway point of year two. The producers making moves now—this fall, this winter—are the ones who’ll be established when the real competition for premium contracts heats up in 2026 and 2027.

What gives me hope is that farms of every size genuinely have pathways forward. From 150-cow family operations I’ve visited who’re targeting local specialty markets to 2,000-cow enterprises supplying export containers, there are viable strategies across the board.

The window’s open right now—but with 2025 nearly in the books and premium market competition accelerating, every month of hesitation means watching another competitor lock in the contracts and relationships that could’ve been yours. Based on everything I’m seeing and hearing, by the time the 2026 harvest rolls around, the early movers will already be counting their premium checks while others are still debating whether to make the shift.

The clock is ticking. The question isn’t whether this shift will happen—it’s whether you’ll be part of it.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Opportunity: Premium dairy imports to China up 18% while commodity down 12%—this isn’t temporary
  • The Timeline: 3-5 year window to establish premium positioning before market saturation
  • The Money: $150,000-$200,000 potential annual revenue increase for 500-cow operations through component optimization
  • The Path: Nutrition changes deliver results in 12-18 months; genetic improvements in 36-48 months
  • The Reality: Not every producer has equal access to premium markets, but opportunities are expanding rapidly

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , ,

Butter Pays Triple: Fonterra’s $75M Investment Proves Components Are Your Future

Tuesday, October 28th, 2025

Fonterra commits $75M to butter while powder markets collapse 39%. Smart producers already pivoting: 10-15% profit gains documented.

Executive Summary: Progressive dairy farms are adding $32,000-87,000 annually by switching from volume to component focus—and Fonterra’s $75 million butter expansion validates their strategy. Butter commands $7,000 per tonne while powder sits at $2,550, a gap that’s widening as Chinese powder demand drops 39% and global butterfat markets stay strong. Smart farms are already moving: investing $10-20 per cow per month in targeted nutrition generates returns of $25-85 within 60-90 days. The window for action is closing—$8 billion in new North American butter and cheese capacity will come online by 2027, and farmers positioned to supply components will capture those premiums, while others scramble to adapt. This analysis provides your roadmap: immediate nutrition optimization, strategic processor positioning within 18 months, and staged genetic transitions starting with your bottom third. The verdict from global markets to Wisconsin farms is unanimous: component density drives profit, volume doesn’t.

Milk Component Value

The global dairy industry is experiencing a fundamental shift in value creation—from volume to components—and farmers who recognize this transition early will position themselves for success in the emerging market structure

You know, when Fonterra announced their NZ$75 million investment to double butter production capacity at the Clandeboye facility in Canterbury, I found myself thinking about what this really means for dairy farmers like us. This goes beyond just another infrastructure upgrade—it represents a fundamental shift in how our industry values milk.

What caught my eye about the timing is this: Global Dairy Trade auctions through October 2025 have consistently shown butter trading between $6,600 and $7,000 per tonne, while skim milk powder sits around $2,550. We’re talking nearly triple the value here. And that price differential isn’t just a temporary market quirk—it reflects something deeper happening across the entire dairy value chain.

What particularly caught my attention was Fonterra’s simultaneous decision to divest their consumer brands to Lactalis for $4.22 billion while expanding butter capacity. On the surface, these moves might seem contradictory, right? But dig deeper, and a coherent strategy emerges—one that dairy farmers everywhere should understand.

Butter commands nearly triple the price of powder, rewriting the playbook for component-focused production and dismissing old volume-based strategies forever.

Understanding the Strategic Shift Behind the Investment

Miles Hurrell, Fonterra’s CEO, framed this investment as increasing production of high-value products while improving their product mix. The numbers behind that statement tell a compelling story. Their ingredients channel, which processes 80% of their milk solids, generated $17.4 billion in their most recent fiscal year. Consumer products? Just $3.3 billion.

That disparity explains why processors globally are refocusing on B2B ingredients rather than consumer brands. It’s a strategic shift that reflects where value creation actually happens in modern dairy markets.

Looking at processing flexibility in the Pacific region, what’s remarkable about New Zealand’s cream plants is their operational agility. They can shift substantial portions of milkfat between anhydrous milk fat and butter production based on market signals. This allows processors to capture whatever premium the market’s offering at any given time.

The global supply picture adds another layer to this story. According to the European Commission’s October 2025 dairy market observatory, European milk production continues growing despite relatively weak farmgate prices. USDA’s Dairy Market News shows U.S. dairy herds have expanded by 2.1% in recent months. DairyNZ confirms New Zealand’s having another strong production season with August 2025 collections up 8.3% year-over-year.

So we’ve got milk oversupply, yet butter prices remain remarkably resilient while powder markets struggle. There’s something structural happening here, and it’s worth paying attention to.

What This Means for Component-Focused Production

This brings us to what really matters for farmers: How do these market dynamics translate to on-farm decisions?

MetricJersey/CrossbredHolsteinAdvantage
Butterfat Content4.3-4.5%3.6%+0.7-0.9% (Jersey)
Protein Content3.6-3.8%3.2%+0.4-0.6% (Jersey)
Component EfficiencySuperiorStandardJersey
Economic Returns vs Holstein+10-15%BaselineJersey
Feed EfficiencyImprovedStandardJersey
Reproductive PerformanceFewer Days OpenBaselineJersey

Research from extension services at Wisconsin, Cornell, and Penn State consistently shows that component efficiency drives profitability more effectively than pure volume production. And the data is compelling. Farms implementing Jersey crossbreeding programs typically see economic returns increase by 10-15% compared to pure Holstein operations—that’s according to multi-year studies in the Journal of Dairy Science. Component levels often reach 4.3-4.5% butterfat and 3.6-3.8% protein, compared to Holstein averages around 3.6% and 3.2% respectively.

What’s encouraging is the improvement in feed efficiency and reproductive performance that comes along with these component gains. Many producers report their crossbred cows show fewer days open and require less intervention during the transition period—you probably know someone who’s seen similar results.

Dr. Randy Shaver from Wisconsin-Madison’s dairy science department documented fascinating case studies in which farms optimizing amino acid nutrition and removing polyunsaturated fat sources saw butterfat increase from around 3.4% to over 4% within weeks. When that translates to several dollars more per hundredweight… well, that’s meaningful money when you’re shipping milk every day, all year long.

I’ve noticed a generational shift happening, too. Younger farmers entering the industry aren’t as attached to the traditional “fill the tank” mentality. They’re looking at component efficiency from day one, asking different questions about genetics, nutrition, and marketing strategies. It’s refreshing, honestly.

The Powder Market Reality Driving Change

China’s powder demand has fallen off a cliff—erasing decades of growth and leaving billions in powder-drying assets stranded.

So why is this shift toward butterfat happening now? The answer lies partly in what’s happening to global powder markets.

Global Dairy Trade auctions in September and October 2025 show both skim milk powder and whole milk powder trading well below historical averages. Chinese imports—which drove powder demand for nearly two decades—remain significantly depressed. China Customs Administration data from August 2025 shows a 39% year-over-year decline. That’s not a blip; that’s a trend.

The situation in China deserves particular attention. While their domestic milk production has been declining (which, in theory, should support imports), the China Dairy Industry Association’s September 2025 report indicates that many Chinese dairy farms are operating at a loss, with farmgate prices hitting multi-year lows. This suggests structural challenges that won’t resolve quickly.

What we’re witnessing is potentially billions of dollars in powder-drying capacity built for a market dynamic that no longer exists. Rabobank’s Q3 2025 dairy quarterly describes these as potential “stranded assets”—infrastructure investments that may never generate expected returns. That’s a sobering thought for processors heavily invested in powder.

Component Optimization: A Practical Framework

For producers considering this transition, here’s what progressive operations are focusing on:

✓ Baseline assessment: Review component tests from the past 6 months to understand where you’re starting
✓ Efficiency calculation: Measure total fat and protein pounds against dry matter intake
✓ Market exploration: Request quotes from 2-3 processors to understand regional pricing dynamics
✓ Nutrition refinement: Work with your nutritionist on amino acid balancing strategies
✓ Fat supplementation: Consider palmitic acid products at 1.5-2% of diet dry matter
✓ Interference removal: Identify and eliminate high PUFA sources that suppress butterfat synthesis
✓ Progress monitoring: Track component response weekly during the initial transition month

Practical Steps for Farmers: The 18-Month Transition Strategy

Based on conversations with producers who’ve successfully navigated this shift, along with extension recommendations, a three-phase approach seems most practical.

Immediate Actions (Next 60-90 Days)

Nutrition optimization offers the fastest path to capturing component premiums. University dairy specialists consistently recommend focusing on amino acid profiles in metabolizable protein, incorporating appropriate fat supplements, and eliminating factors that suppress butterfat synthesis.

The economics are encouraging here. Research from land-grant universities, including Michigan State and the University of Minnesota, suggests that investing $10-20 per cow per month in targeted nutrition typically yields returns of $25-85. Even if your current processor doesn’t fully reward components today, you’re still capturing feed efficiency gains and often seeing reproductive benefits that improve overall herd health.

One practical approach: Start by reviewing your current ration with fresh eyes. Many farms discover they’re feeding ingredients that actively suppress butterfat—things that made sense when volume was king, but work against component optimization. It’s surprising what you might find.

Short-Term Strategy (6-18 Months)

This development suggests interesting market dynamics ahead. With processors across North America investing billions in new capacity—the International Dairy Foods Association reports over $8 billion in announced projects through 2026—they’ll need a quality milk supply to fill that infrastructure.

For U.S. producers operating outside supply management, this creates direct opportunities. I recently heard from a producer in Pennsylvania who documented her component levels and quality metrics over several months, then approached three processors for competitive quotes. When her existing buyer realized she had genuine alternatives offering 50 cents more per hundredweight, they suddenly found room to improve their pricing structure. Funny how that works.

The Canadian experience offers different lessons. While producers there can’t negotiate directly with processors—they sell to provincial milk marketing boards, which allocate milk—their transparent pricing system, administered by the Canadian Dairy Commission, clearly rewards components. October 2025 butterfat prices are $11.84 per kilogram, versus $8.31 for protein. This regulated system has driven on-farm decisions toward component optimization for years, since that’s how farmers maximize returns within the supply management framework. Canadian producers have focused intensively on genetics and nutrition to optimize components because that’s their only lever for improving revenue—they can’t negotiate volume or switch buyers.

U.S. producers following the June 2025 Federal Milk Marketing Order reforms have more flexibility but less pricing transparency. The principle of demanding clear component pricing from cooperatives remains valid for those who can negotiate or explore alternatives.

Long-Term Positioning (18+ Months)

Genetic decisions made today will determine your component profile when new processing capacity comes online in 2028-2030. Extension geneticists generally recommend starting conservatively—perhaps with your bottom third of cows for initial crossbreeding trials.

This staged approach allows you to evaluate results while maintaining operational flexibility. If market signals remain positive by mid-2026, you can expand the program. The timeline matters here because first-cross heifers bred today won’t enter your milking string for about 24 months.

Understanding Regional Variations

Different regions are adapting to this component-focused reality in distinct ways, and there’s something to learn from each approach.

New Zealand demonstrates that the model works even with smaller herd sizes—their average herd size remains under 500 cows, according to DairyNZ’s 2024-25 statistics. Their payment system has been optimized for milk solids rather than volume for years, creating remarkable efficiency. What’s particularly noteworthy is that, as Fonterra’s market share has declined to 77.8% according to the New Zealand Commerce Commission’s September 2025 report, and competitors have offered attractive component-focused pricing, it’s actually forced all processors to be more responsive to farmer needs.

In the United States, the Federal Milk Marketing Order reforms implemented in June 2025—the first major update since 2008—formally recognized that butterfat now accounts for 58% of milk check income, according to the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service. Yet many cooperative payment systems haven’t fully adjusted to this reality, creating opportunities for producers willing to negotiate or explore alternatives.

California producers face unique challenges with transportation distances and processor consolidation, but they’re also seeing some of the strongest component premiums in the country. The California Department of Food and Agriculture’s September 2025 data shows component premiums averaging $0.85 per hundredweight above the state average. That adds up quickly.

The Northeast presents another interesting case. Smaller farms there are finding that component optimization allows them to remain competitive despite scale disadvantages. When you’re shipping high-component milk, processor transportation costs become more manageable on a solids basis—that’s just math working in your favor.

Component optimization delivers impressive profit across all herd sizes, proving quality trumps scale in the new dairy order.

The Risks We Should Monitor—And How to Prepare

Now, while the component-focused future seems clear, several risks deserve attention along with strategies to address them.

China’s economic trajectory remains the biggest wildcard. If their dairy demand remains weak for several more years, global export markets will come under pressure. But what’s encouraging is butter’s diverse demand base—spanning Asia, the Middle East, and developed markets—provides more resilience than powder’s historically China-dependent structure. Smart farms are diversifying their risk by not betting everything on export-dependent processors.

Precision fermentation technology represents a longer-term consideration. Companies like Yali Bio and Melt & Marble are developing fermented dairy fats, with some targeting commercial launches in 2026, according to their August 2025 corporate announcements. While price parity is likely 5-10 years away, according to the Good Food Institute’s September 2025 analysis, this technology could eventually compete for commodity ingredient applications. The best defense? Focus on premium quality that commands loyalty beyond pure commodity competition.

The impact of GLP-1 weight-loss medications on dairy consumption patterns is another emerging factor. Research in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics from July 2025 indicates households using these medications reduce butter consumption by approximately 6%, primarily in retail channels rather than foodservice. Current adoption sits at 3.2% of the U.S. population according to CDC data from August 2025, though Morgan Stanley projects potential growth to 7-9% by 2035. It’s worth monitoring, but foodservice demand remains more stable.

Perspectives from Progressive Operations

Extension case studies from farms that have successfully transitioned offer valuable insights. The University of Wisconsin-Madison’s August 2025 extension bulletin documented Wisconsin farms reporting economic improvements ranging from $32,000 to $87,000 annually for 500-cow operations. The variation depends largely on their starting point and local market dynamics, but the direction is consistently positive.

The common thread among successful transitions? Methodical tracking of component efficiency—measuring pounds of fat and protein against pounds of dry matter intake. This metric, more than any other, determines economic sustainability in a component-valued market.

International examples provide additional perspective. Brazilian operations dealing with heat stress have found Jersey genetics particularly valuable. Embrapa Dairy Cattle’s 2025 annual report shows 12-15% improvement in component efficiency under tropical conditions—that’s significant when you’re battling heat and humidity. Australian producers recovering from recent industry challenges are focusing intensively on specialty cheese and butterfat products for Asian markets, as documented in Dairy Australia’s September 2025 market analysis. These diverse experiences suggest the component-focused approach adapts well across different production environments.

Essential Lessons for Dairy Farmers

After examining the data, market trends, and producer experiences, several principles emerge clearly.

Component optimization is transitioning from competitive advantage to operational necessity. The most successful farms won’t necessarily be the largest, but those producing high-component milk at competitive costs while maintaining operational flexibility.

Processing flexibility matters tremendously. Fonterra’s ability to shift between butter, AMF, and cream products based on market signals provides the resilience that single-product strategies can’t match. We should seek similar flexibility in our own operations.

Information asymmetry remains expensive but addressable. Farms that invest modestly in market intelligence and professional advisory services often identify pricing opportunities worth tens of thousands of dollars annually. The key is translating that information into actionable operational changes.

The transition period through 2027 creates a particular opportunity. As new processing capacity comes online, farmers who’ve already positioned for component production will be ready to capture emerging premiums.

Looking Forward: Your Strategic Path

The dairy industry stands at a genuine inflection point. Processing infrastructure is shifting toward butterfat-intensive products. Payment systems are gradually recognizing the value of components. Technology continues creating both opportunities and challenges for traditional dairy farming.

Fonterra’s $75 million investment signals confidence that butterfat will maintain its premium status despite powder market challenges. They’re betting this trend continues for at least the next decade. Whether they’re right depends on multiple variables—economic recovery in key markets, technology advancement rates, and evolving consumer preferences.

What seems certain is that measuring dairy success purely by tank volume is becoming increasingly obsolete. As one thoughtful producer recently observed at the World Dairy Expo: “My grandfather measured success by how full the bulk tank was. I measure it by what’s in it. Same tank, completely different business.”

The capital flowing into Clandeboye’s butter expansion represents Fonterra’s vision for dairy’s future. The decisions each of us makes about breeding, feeding, and marketing our milk will determine who captures the value that investment creates.

For an industry with deep traditions and generational farming operations, change comes slowly. Yet the message from New Zealand—and increasingly from progressive farms worldwide—deserves serious consideration. The future of profitable dairy farming isn’t just about filling the tank anymore. It’s fundamentally about what’s in it.

The producers who’ve already made this shift aren’t looking backward. They’re focused on optimizing components, improving efficiency, and building sustainable operations for the next generation. They’re positioning their farms to thrive in this new reality, not just survive it.

And honestly? They’re wondering why it took the rest of us so long to recognize what they figured out years ago.

The path forward is clear for those willing to see it. The only question is whether you’ll be among the farmers leading this transition—or playing catch-up when the market forces your hand.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Opportunity: Butterfat pays 3X powder ($7,000 vs $2,550/tonne) and the gap’s widening as Chinese powder demand craters 39%
  • The Payoff: Component-focused farms are banking $32,000-87,000 extra annually—proven across 500-cow Wisconsin operations to small Northeast herds
  • The Fast Win: Invest $10-20 per cow monthly in amino acid nutrition, capture $25-85 returns within 60 days (400% ROI)
  • The Deadline: $8 billion in new butter/cheese processing capacity comes online by 2027—position now or watch others lock in your premiums
  • Your Action Plan: Start Monday with nutrition optimization, document components for processor leverage, breed the bottom 30% to Jersey genetics this cycle

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

  • The Art of Feeding for Components: Beyond the Basics – This article provides advanced nutritional strategies for maximizing butterfat and protein. It reveals specific methods for balancing fatty acids and improving rumen health, allowing you to turn the market signals discussed in our main feature into tangible gains in your bulk tank.
  • Navigating the New FMMO Landscape: What Producers Need to Know Now – While our feature covers the global market shift, this analysis drills down into the recent FMMO reforms. It provides critical insights for understanding your milk check and leveraging new pricing realities to negotiate more effectively with your processor.
  • Genomic Testing Isn’t Just for the Elite Sires Anymore – To accelerate the genetic progress mentioned in our 18+ month strategy, this piece demonstrates how to use affordable genomic testing on your commercial heifers. Learn how to make faster, data-driven breeding decisions to boost component traits across your entire herd.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , ,

The 90-Day Dairy Pivot: Converting Beef Windfalls into Next Year’s Survival

Monday, October 20th, 2025

Cull cows over $2,000 and beef-on-dairy calves near $1,000—why this 90-day window could make or break your 2026 margins

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Fall 2025 delivers an uncommon—and urgent—opportunity for U.S. dairy operators. Strong cull and beef-on-dairy calf prices, reported at $2,000+ and near $1,000 respectively, are keeping many herds afloat amid relentlessly flat $17 milk. University and market economists warn these beef premiums look fleeting, with the cattle cycle and supply signals already tightening for 2026. Recent research shows Midwestern breakevens remain high, while only producers invested in butterfat performance and rigorous herd management capture true component bonuses. Meanwhile, export hopes are dimming—contract premiums are now won on genetics, traceability, and relentless cost control. As lenders prepare for summer’s critical cattle inventory and cash flow reviews, operations with intentional plans—whether expanding, pivoting, or winding down—consistently protect more equity. The next three months are a “use it or lose it” window for turning fleeting beef revenue into sustainable resilience. What farmers are discovering is that asking hard questions, running fresh numbers, and pushing for proactivity can make 2026 a year of opportunity—not regret.

Dairy Market Pivot

Checking in with producers this fall, there’s one urgent takeaway: this is a critical 90-day window to turn temporary beef premiums into lasting resilience for 2026. The evidence is in the numbers—cull cows clearing $2,000 and beef-on-dairy calves pushing $1,000 (USDA National Weekly Direct Cow and Bull Report, October 2025). These premiums are propping up many milk checks stuck at $17. However, as extension economists and market analysts from the University of Wisconsin and Cornell emphasize, these conditions are shifting. We’re staring down the last weeks of this run before cattle cycles and supply buildup set a new tone for the coming year.

What’s interesting here is seeing smart operators use this moment to shore up their businesses—paying down debt, making pro-active facility investments, and building a cash buffer instead of assuming current premiums will last. This development suggests that treating a tailwind as flexibility—not false security—creates real strategic advantage for the next transition period.

The crisis in black and white: milk checks stuck at $17 while breakevens demand $17.50-$18.50, but cull cows and beef calves are throwing off unprecedented cash—turning cattle into the lifeline keeping farms afloat.

The Math of Survival: Breakevens & Components

Revenue Source2024 BaselineFall 2025Per Cow Impact100-Cow Herd
Cull Cows (15% rate)$1,500/head$2,000+/head+$75+$7,500
Beef-Dairy Calves (40% births)$600/head$1,000/head+$160+$16,000
Component Bonus (3.7%+ protein)Base milk+$1.25/cwt+$31/yr+$3,100
TOTAL OPPORTUNITY—Stack strategies+$266/cow+$26,600
🚨 Baseline (No Action)Wait for recoveryMiss window-$50 to -$150-$5K to -$15K

Looking at this trend, most Midwest herds face pre-beef breakevens between $17.50 and $18.50/cwt (UW Center for Dairy Profitability, Fall 2025 Update). Out west, Idaho’s and Texas’s biggest dry lot systems sometimes run at $14–$15/cwt, riding local feed and labor edge. Either way, high butterfat performance is the separating factor. Hitting 3.7% protein or better can mean $1–$1.50/cwt over base—if you’ve invested in genetics, tight fresh cow management, and keep transition periods on track. As many of us have seen, those premiums aren’t accidental; they follow from tough culling decisions and knowing your numbers cold.

That $1-$1.50/cwt component bonus isn’t optional anymore—it’s the difference between red ink and breaking even, between selling out and surviving another season with $17 milk

Export Hopes, Local Contracts

For years, many of us held out hope that another export surge would save the day—especially from China. But this season’s USDA GAIN trade data and Rabobank’s Dairy Quarterly all show it’s growth in cheese and butter, mostly cornered by New Zealand and Europe, that’s outpacing demand for U.S. powder. In the Midwest and Northeast, plants are hungry for consistent, high-component, specialty contracts. Herds that made early investments in A2, organic, or niche certifications find their milk in demand; others should ask whether fluid or low-component contracts will provide enough margin as the cycle shifts.

July Inventory—Lender Stress & Planning Leverage

It’s no surprise to seasoned managers that the USDA July Cattle Inventory Report is more than an annual headcount. When beef prices soften and heifer retention ticks up, lenders across regions—like those briefed by Minnesota Extension and New York FarmNet—run tougher stress tests on farm finances. Farms sitting right at a 1.25x debt service coverage are fine for now, but that can slip fast. Those who restructure or plot a sale while balance sheets are still strong tend to carve out six-figure equity advantages compared to late, forced exits. The lesson, as risk educators preach, is that deliberate action always beats hoping for a bounce.

Three Lanes: Exit, Pivot, or Scale

From kitchen tables in northeast Iowa to group calls with Western Idaho co-ops, three paths are front and center:

  • Exit with Intention: Producers looking at high debt or retirement are using strong asset values to secure their family legacies, not just chasing another cycle.
  • Premium Niche Pivot: Some are cutting herd size, chasing premium contracts—A2, grassfed, organic, you name it—with a willingness to meet tough specs on components, health, and traceability. This approach works best when paired with deep processor relationships and quick financial routines.
  • Expansion: A Tool for the Prepared: Rabobank’s 2025 sector review and extension management profiles agree: disciplined, high-performing herds with fresh cow and labor management dialed in can scale with confidence. For others, fast growth just means fast exposure if things don’t break right.

The north star here? Monthly cost-of-production benchmarking, regular review with lenders, and not waiting to renegotiate contracts until margins are squeezed.

Global Competition & Policy Realities

U.S. Midwest producers face a brutal 20-45% cost disadvantage against New Zealand and Argentina—at $0.39/lb versus $0.27-$0.32, every efficiency gain and premium matters when you’re starting in the hole.

It’s worth noting that IFCN’s 2025 benchmarks put leading New Zealand and Argentina herds at $0.27–$0.32/lb. Even top Western U.S. performers run about $0.35, with most Midwest herds closer to $0.39. The gap isn’t destiny: it reflects differences in feed-to-milk efficiency, heifer survival, and transition consistency. Policy backstops like DMC are valuable, and analysis from Cornell and Wisconsin Extension reinforce this: they help good operators stay afloat but aren’t enough to shore up chronic losses over time.

The Myth of the “Deal of the Century”

As expansion talk returns, recent Rabobank analysis and local case studies ring a familiar bell: the “deal of the century” works out for operations already strong on the basics—cost, herd health, labor discipline. Ramped-up purchases without this foundation rarely yield the hoped-for returns and often accelerate operational headaches.

Action Steps: Navigating the 90-Day Window

Here’s the practical bottom line: This window is closing, not expanding. First, benchmark your cost of production with the latest IFCN and extension tools; don’t trust last year’s averages. Next, proactively arrange a review session with your banker—not to plead for relief, but to present your plan for surviving and thriving into next year. Scrutinize your processor or coop contracts and specialty program agreements—will you be the supplier they prioritize in a shrinking market? And take the time this fall to address transition and herd health; waiting until calving issues flare won’t do.

The difference for 2026 will be made by those who act intentionally and aren’t afraid to adjust their course. That’s the mindset that’s kept American dairies resilient through every market twist—and it’s how the smartest operators I know are reading this moment.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Farms leveraging this fall’s beef premiums could improve net margins by $100 to $200 per cow, while disciplined herd and transition management opens $1–$1.50/cwt in component bonuses (UW Extension, IFCN, Rabobank).
  • Practical action: Benchmark your cost of production now, meet proactively with lenders to review true breakevens, and secure or re-align premium contracts for 2026 before markets tighten.
  • Butterfat, protein, and health discipline now outperform volume; herds that master transition periods and component payouts lead in uncertain markets.
  • The window for turning “luck” into a long-term strategy is closing. Lenders, markets, and export buyers all point to greater volatility ahead for operations not dialed on costs or value.
  • Across Wisconsin, Idaho, and the Northeast, the most resilient producers are those who build trusted advisor relationships and plan ahead—regardless of herd size or business model.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , ,

August USDA Milk Production Report Breakdown: Why 19.52 billion Pounds of Richer Milk Changes the Game

Monday, September 22nd, 2025

Why are smart producers still expanding herds when Class III futures sit below $17? The genetic revolution changed the economics of everything.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The August 2025 USDA milk report reveals more than record production—it exposes how genetic improvements have fundamentally altered dairy market dynamics in ways most analysts are missing. While we’re celebrating 9.52 million head producing 19.52 billion pounds (up 3.2% year-over-year), the real story lies in component-adjusted growth that could represent manufacturing capacity increases approaching 25% when butterfat and protein improvements are factored in. Recent research from DHIA records shows consistent component improvement patterns across regions, with today’s fresh cows testing butterfat levels that exceed historical peak lactation averages. This genetic revolution creates permanent productivity gains that won’t reverse during market downturns—unlike previous management-based improvements that could be scaled back during tough times. Processing infrastructure built for 3.7% butterfat milk now struggles with today’s richer milk during peak production periods, creating regional bottlenecks that force supply management decisions at higher price points than historical norms. What farmers are finding is that individual expansion decisions that make economic sense collectively create oversupply challenges, while Class III futures trading below $17 through May 2026 suggest markets expect this correction to persist longer than traditional six-to-nine-month cycles. Progressive producers are responding by optimizing efficiency over expansion, building strategic processor relationships, and recognizing that success in this new reality depends on converting genetic abundance into sustainable profitability rather than simply chasing volume.

dairy component profitability

That August USDA milk report has folks talking—some celebrating the production numbers, others wondering what they really mean for our markets. Sure, we hit 9.52 million head in our national dairy herd, the biggest it’s been since 1993, according to the monthly data that came out last week. And those 19.52 billion pounds of milk in August, with that 3.2% bump over last year? Pretty impressive on the surface.

But I’ve been having conversations with producers from different regions recently, and something’s becoming clear… the way genetics have changed what those production numbers actually represent. We’re not just producing more milk anymore—we’re producing fundamentally richer milk. And that’s creating market dynamics that don’t follow the playbook most of us learned twenty years ago.

One producer I spoke with recently—who has been milking up in Wisconsin for thirty-five years—made a point that really stuck with me. “My fresh cows are testing higher on butterfat right out of calving than my best cows used to test at peak lactation back in 2010.” That’s the genetic revolution in action, and it’s happening across the industry whether we’re fully accounting for it or not.

The Component Reality That Changes Everything

When you look beyond just volume and start considering butterfat and protein levels—what some industry analysts are calling component-adjusted growth—that 3.2% increase starts telling a different story. The manufacturing capacity increase could be substantially higher when you account for these component improvements.

The Hidden Story: Component-Adjusted Growth Outpaces Volume – While raw milk production has grown steadily, genetic improvements mean actual manufacturing capacity has expanded nearly twice as fast, creating the oversupply dynamics that traditional market analysis misses.

Think about this: your average butterfat test has been climbing steadily over the past couple of decades. The DHIA records and breeding association data show consistent improvement patterns, though the exact numbers vary by region and genetic program. That means every 100 pounds of today’s milk carries more actual butter-making and cheese-making potential than the same volume did two decades ago.

Not everyone, however, sees this as concerning. One producer I know down in Texas actually loves these genetic improvements—his cooperative expanded processing capacity specifically to handle higher-component milk, and he’s seeing better margins per cow than ever before.

But here’s what’s particularly noteworthy… the permanent nature of these gains compared to previous productivity improvements. When breeding values for components keep improving—and you can track this through genomic evaluations from the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding—those gains become part of every heifer entering your herd, regardless of market conditions.

The Infrastructure Bottleneck: Why Your Co-op is Sweating

While we’ve developed essentially unlimited genetic potential for higher components, processing capacity remains fixed. Those aging continuous flow systems weren’t designed for today’s component levels—most were built when 3.7% butterfat was considered excellent production.

During this past spring flush, there were reports from several states of producers having to find alternative outlets because facilities couldn’t handle both the volume and richness of milk they were receiving. According to data from processing industry reports, some regional cooperatives are operating closer to capacity limits than they’ve experienced in decades.

To be fair, not all processors see this as a problem. Some plant managers say the higher components actually make their operations more efficient—more cheese per pound of milk means better margins when demand is strong. But when processors hit their limits during peak production periods, they start offering steep discounts or implementing volume controls that create price volatility.

The Expansion Paradox: Why Farmers Keep Growing Despite the Warnings

Despite these warning signs, many producers are still expanding herds. And when you dig into the individual economics, it often makes sense.

One producer I recently spoke with paid record prices for replacement heifers this year—and we’re seeing some of the highest costs for quality genetics that many of us can remember. But when those heifers are producing milk with substantially higher component levels, the economics can still pencil out.

This creates one of those situations where what makes sense for your operation individually might create challenges for all of us collectively. Modern high-component cows are remarkably efficient at converting feed into valuable solids, which shifts the economic threshold for supply reductions higher… meaning prices might need to fall further and stay lower longer.

What the Markets Already Know

The futures markets are telling an interesting story. Class III contracts through May 2026 are trading below $17, according to Chicago Mercantile Exchange data. The global picture adds complexity too—China’s adjusting dairy imports while the EU has shifting consumption patterns.

That international safety valve we used to rely on isn’t as predictable as it once was, putting more pressure on domestic markets to find balance.

Smart Operators Are Already Pivoting

What I find encouraging is seeing how thoughtful producers are responding to these shifting dynamics:

  • Herd optimization over expansion: Evaluating culling decisions based on component efficiency
  • Processing partnerships: Securing agreements and component premiums to avoid spot market exposure
  • Value-added ventures: Direct-to-consumer operations, on-farm processing, specialized product lines

Regional examples are emerging everywhere:

  • Vermont producers are managing fresh cow schedules to avoid peak flush periods when processing gets tight
  • California operations are investing in processing partnerships to control milk destination
  • Southeast dairies finding success with direct-to-consumer cheese operations
  • Georgia producers telling me they’re grateful for the higher components that used just to boost their commodity check

Farm Scale: Who Wins and Who Struggles

Large commercial dairies have scale advantages and financial resources, but could get squeezed if processing constraints force volume limits.

Mid-size family operations face the toughest challenge—lacking both scale advantages and the flexibility to pivot quickly into niche markets.

Smaller dairies may have advantages through their quick pivoting ability and direct marketing relationships, which provide price stability.

The Longer Correction Timeline

Traditional dairy corrections used to run about six to nine months. Several factors suggest this one could stretch longer:

  • Record herd sizes
  • Genetic productivity gains that won’t reverse
  • Shifted global demand patterns
  • Processing constraints are forcing supply management at higher price points
Why This Correction Will Run Longer – Current Class III futures trajectory (black line) shows extended weakness compared to typical 6-9 month recovery cycles (red line), reflecting how genetic productivity gains have fundamentally altered supply-demand rebalancing timelines

What’s interesting about this potential timeline is how processing infrastructure limitations might force supply decisions that wouldn’t normally happen until prices fell much lower.

Your Processor Relationship Just Became Strategic

One thing that’s becoming clearer: your relationship with your processor matters more than it used to. With genetic productivity climbing but plant capacity relatively fixed, these partnerships are becoming competitive advantages beyond just price negotiations.

Early indications suggest seasonal patterns are becoming more pronounced—cooperatives are implementing volume management during spring flush that would’ve been unusual just a few years ago.

Many Midwest producers report that their cooperatives are having different conversations about intake planning than they used to have. It’s not just about having enough trucks anymore—it’s about whether the plants can actually handle the richness of the milk coming in during peak periods.

Market Indicators Worth Watching

Key signals for how this plays out:

  • Class III futures staying below $17.50 through early 2026
  • Processing capacity announcements (expansions or constraints)
  • Component premiums at the farm level during peak production
  • Feed price relationships as high-component cows change traditional ratios

What’s developing is that component premiums during peak production periods are becoming a bigger factor. If cooperatives start offering larger premiums for high-butterfat milk during flush seasons, that’s them trying to manage intake through economics rather than outright volume controls.

The New Industry Structure Taking Shape

We’re likely to see a more differentiated industry, where farms with sustainable competitive advantages, based on efficiency, processor relationships, and value-added strategies, emerge stronger.

The genetic revolution delivered tremendous productivity gains, but it also fundamentally changed how markets balance supply and demand. What I’ve noticed is that traditional price signals that used to trigger production adjustments don’t seem to work at the same thresholds anymore.

Your Strategic Playbook for What’s Ahead

For cash flow planning, think in terms of longer cycles. Investment priorities are shifting toward:

  • Efficiency improvements that reduce the cost per unit of components
  • Better cow comfort to improve butterfat performance
  • Precision feeding to optimize protein and fat production
  • Facility upgrades that improve labor efficiency per cow

Fresh cow management is getting more attention, too—when every cow’s component production matters more to your bottom line, getting fresh cows off to a strong start becomes critical. That means paying closer attention to dry cow nutrition, calving ease, and those first few weeks post-calving where you’re really setting the stage for the entire lactation.

I’ve been noticing more producers are looking at their feeding programs differently, too. With component production being so critical to margins, ration adjustments that boost butterfat and protein tests—even at slightly higher feed costs—often make more economic sense than volume-focused strategies.

The Bottom Line

The farms positioning themselves for long-term success are embracing efficiency over expansion, building strong processor relationships, and understanding that success will be determined by how well they convert genetic abundance into sustainable profitability.

This isn’t just another commodity cycle—it’s a fundamental shift in how our industry operates. The data from that August USDA report is just the beginning of a conversation about where we’re headed.

What’s encouraging is that producers who are working through these challenges now, building relationships and optimizing efficiency rather than chasing size, are positioning themselves to thrive regardless of how this plays out. The genetic improvements we’ve achieved represent decades of careful breeding decisions paying off.

Now we need to learn how to manage an industry with that kind of abundance in a way that works for everyone involved. It’s an interesting challenge, but one I think we’re up for if we approach it thoughtfully and keep talking to each other about what we’re seeing on our own operations.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Component efficiency optimization can reduce cost per pound of valuable solids by 8-15% through strategic culling of bottom-performing cows and precision feeding programs that boost butterfat and protein tests, even at slightly higher feed costs.
  • Processing partnership agreements provide price stability and guaranteed offtake during capacity constraints, with some cooperatives offering higher component premiums during peak production periods to manage intake through economic incentives rather than volume controls.
  • Fresh cow management improvements become critical when higher component production directly impacts bottom-line profitability—better transition period nutrition and calving protocols can set the stage for superior lactation performance in today’s genetic environment.
  • Extended correction timeline planning requires 18-24 month cash flow models instead of traditional six-to-nine-month assumptions, as genetic productivity gains that won’t reverse mean supply reductions need to be deeper and longer-lasting to achieve market rebalancing.
  • Regional processing capacity varies significantly, with some areas investing in infrastructure designed for higher-component milk while others experience bottlenecks—understanding your local processing situation becomes a competitive advantage for strategic planning and marketing decisions.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

Why Milk Components Are Your Best Friend Now (and Why Chasing Volume is Yesterday’s News)

Friday, September 5th, 2025

What if you could boost your payout without boosting volume? Let’s talk butterfat.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s the real deal: The dairy business has shifted completely. It’s no longer about how many gallons you pump out, but the value packed into your milk’s protein and butterfat. Picture this — a typical 850-cow herd producing 59,500 lbs daily can earn an extra $2,200 every single day just by pushing better components! Nationwide, we’re seeing butterfat average 4.23% and protein hit 3.29%, driving real increases in farmgate value. But it’s not the same everywhere — Texas is absolutely booming with +6% growth thanks to new cheese plants, while California’s getting squeezed by heat and water constraints. Global markets matter too — Mexico’s spending $2.47 billion on our dairy, keeping demand strong. Bottom line? If you haven’t shifted your focus to milk components and smart risk management, you’re leaving serious money on the table in 2025.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Component quality pays big — even bumping butterfat and protein by a tenth of a percent adds thousands to your daily revenue across the whole herd.
  • Genomic testing isn’t optional anymore — spending $40 per calf on testing and using high PTA bulls for fat/protein is proven ROI in today’s market.
  • Hedge your bets early — use Class III and IV futures plus Dairy Revenue Protection to lock in these strong margins before they disappear.
  • Watch global demand closely — Mexico and Southeast Asia are driving U.S. dairy prices, so track those export numbers and GDT auction results.
  • Don’t skimp on biosecurity or heifer strategy — with HPAI hitting 1000+ herds and replacement costs at $3000+ per head, protection is profit.
milk components, dairy profitability, genomic testing, farm risk management, dairy market trends

Look, if you’re still measuring success by how many gallons roll out of your bulk tank, you’re fighting yesterday’s war. The real money these days — what I call the game-changer — is swimming inside that milk: butterfat and protein. And honestly? It’s not even close anymore.

I was shooting the breeze with Jim last week. Third-generation guy up in Marathon County, Wisconsin, runs about 850 head — mostly Holsteins with some Jersey crosses thrown in for good measure. “Ten years ago, I was all about pounds per cow,” he told me, leaning against his parlor rail after evening milking. “Now? I’m laser-focused on hitting those component numbers.”

Jim’s got the goods: his milk’s testing 4.2% butterfat and 3.3% protein these days. That bump is putting serious money in his pocket every single day.

Here’s what’s really happening with production…

According to the latest USDA numbers, we’ve been on a losing streak — milk volumes dropping for 13 straight months through July 2024. Sounds scary, right? But here’s the thing that’s got everyone talking: the milk we are producing is richer than it’s ever been.

Recent data from CoBank shows butterfat levels hit 4.23% nationally in 2024, up from barely scraping 4% just a few years back. Protein’s climbing too — 3.29% average now, compared to around 3.04% back in 2004. (That’s genetic progress you can bank on, literally.)

And it’s not playing out the same everywhere…

Down in Texas, they’re singing a completely different tune. Milk production jumped 6% last year, thanks to massive cheese plant expansions in places like Amarillo and Lubbock. I’m talking facilities that are pulling milk from counties that never mattered much before — trucks running extra miles just to feed these operations.

Meanwhile, California is grappling with significant headwinds — heat stress and water restrictions that are putting a real squeeze on yields. Up here in the traditional dairy belt — Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York — we’re seeing herd contraction and flat production.

What strikes me about this shift is how it’s forcing everyone to think differently about what matters.

Let’s talk money, because that’s what pays the bills…

Here’s where the math gets really interesting. An 850-cow herd averaging 70 pounds produces 59,500 pounds of milk daily — that’s 595 hundredweight (cwt). Using current Federal Milk Marketing Order pricing, the value difference between average components and top-tier is $3.70 per cwt ($23.85 – $20.15).

Here’s the kicker: 595 cwt × $3.70 = $2,201.50 per day. Scale that over a month, and you’re looking at an additional $66,000 in revenue — a figure that changes the entire financial picture of an operation.

Take Sarah up in St. Lawrence County, New York. She’s running 280 registered Holsteins and dropping about $40 per calf on genomic testing, specifically targeting bulls with killer PTA scores for fat and protein. “Every extra tenth of a percent pays for that test ten times over,” she says. “I can’t afford not to do this anymore.”

Now, about those market moves…

As of early September, October Class III CME futures have been dancing around $20.85, with Class IV trading near $21.75. (These are approximate numbers — market prices change daily, so check with your broker for current quotes.) When Class IV trades above Class III like that, it’s the market telling you butter and powder are worth more than cheese right now.

This creates opportunities if you know how to read it. Danny, down in Green County, learned this lesson the expensive way. “I got burned waiting for better prices back in 2020,” he admits, standing in his feed alley watching the mixer wagon load up. “Now, when the spread looks good, I lock in margins with DRP. Sleep better at night.”

But let’s be real about the painful stuff too…

Replacement heifers are absolutely crushing budgets right now. The USDA reports national averages around $2,660 per head, but that’s conservative. Premium Holstein replacements are routinely hitting $3,000-plus at auctions, with some California and Minnesota sales pushing over $4,000.

Why? The beef-on-dairy trend. Using beef semen on your lower-tier cows creates a nice revenue stream from those crossbred calves, sure. But it’s also squeezed purebred heifer supplies to a 20-year low. There’s your unintended consequence.

Then there’s bird flu hanging over everything. Over 1,000 dairy herds across 17 states have dealt with HPAI this year. The farms that invested early in biosecurity — limiting visitors, boot washes, bird-proofing feed areas — they’re seeing the payoff in fewer disruptions and healthier herds.

Where’s your milk actually going?

This might surprise you, but when that semi pulls away from your farm, there’s a good chance it’s headed south of the border. Mexico bought $2.47 billion worth of U.S. dairy in 2024, making them our biggest customer by far. That’s not just a statistic — it’s cash flow that directly supports your milk price.

“I’ve completely changed how I think about our market,” says Maria, whose 650-cow operation outside Modesto produces high-component milk primarily destined for export. “We’re feeding families in Mexico City now, not just the local fluid plant. That global connection makes me more focused on consistency than ever.”

Asia’s more complicated. China’s tightening its imports as it builds domestic production, but Southeast Asian countries continue to buy steadily. Don’t sleep on those twice-monthly Global Dairy Trade auction results either — they move our futures markets more than some domestic reports.

So what’s your game plan?

From conversations I’m having with producers across the country, here’s what’s working:

  • Focus your genetics on PTA Fat, PTA Protein, and Net Merit when selecting sires. The extra genomic testing cost pays for itself in the first lactation — ask your AI tech about proven component transmitters.
  • Get serious about risk management. Work with your farm advisor to understand how futures and Dairy Revenue Protection can lock in margins when favorable spreads appear. Don’t wait for perfect conditions — they rarely come.
  • Start budgeting for $3,000+ heifer costs or develop internal breeding programs. The cost advantage of raising your own has never been clearer.
  • Double down on biosecurity. Those protocols aren’t optional anymore — simple steps like visitor logs, clean boots, and bird-proof feed storage consistently beat the cost of dealing with disease outbreaks.
  • Track global demand shifts, especially in Mexico and Southeast Asia. These purchases directly impact your farm’s profitability, whether you realize it or not.

Regional reality check:

RegionProduction TrendWhat’s Driving It
Traditional Dairy BeltDown ~1.5%Aging herds, flat yields, and higher costs
TexasUp 6%New cheese plants are creating a demand vacuum
CaliforniaDown ~2%Heat stress, water restrictions

The bottom line?

Volume-focused dairying is becoming yesterday’s business model. Today’s winners are mastering components, managing market risks, and protecting herd health with the same intensity they once devoted to increasing pounds per cow.

The farms that understand this shift fastest are separating themselves from the competition. Jim’s already adjusting his breeding program and marketing strategy. Danny’s hedging aggressively. Sarah’s investing in genomics, just as her operation depends on it — because it does.

What’s particularly fascinating about this transition is how it’s forcing the entire industry to get smarter. The old days of just maximizing volume and hoping for the best? Those are gone.

The question isn’t whether this new reality is fair — it’s how fast you’ll adapt to stay competitive. Because in 2025, your survival depends on understanding that every tenth of a percent of butterfat and protein matters more than the extra gallon you used to chase.

The industry’s changing fast, and honestly? That’s what makes this business so interesting.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Management
Tags : , , , ,

Coca-Cola’s $650M Bet: Is Your Milk Good Enough for the Fairlife Payout?

Monday, August 18th, 2025

Over 82,000 cows are needed daily for this plant — are you ready for the Fairlife impact?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Coca-Cola just dropped $650 million on a massive Fairlife facility in Webster, New York — and this changes everything for Northeast producers. This plant will demand steady milk from over 82,000 cows daily, creating huge regional supply pressure. But here’s the kicker: the real money isn’t in volume anymore, it’s in component consistency. Producers who achieve a SCC below 200,000 and maintain a protein level above 3.15% can earn premiums approaching $2.50/cwt, with a realistic payback period of 18–24 months. This isn’t just happening here — Europe’s been running ultra-filtered milk programs with strong premiums and high efficiency for years. If you want to grow profit in 2025, start focusing on components and documentation now, before everyone else catches on.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Premium contracts deliver real cash: Hit SCC below 200,000 and protein above 3.15% to unlock up to $2.50/cwt premium — pull your DHIA data this week and calculate your protein coefficient of variation
  • Consistency beats everything: Protein swings over 0.5% kill processing efficiency and cost you money — work with your nutritionist to stabilize feed and milk components
  • Massive regional opportunity: Webster needs milk from 82,000+ cows daily starting late 2025 — position your operation early while contract terms are still flexible
  • Smart investment pays back fast: Budget $125–175 per cow for testing equipment and cooling upgrades, with a realistic 18–24 month payback if you maintain quality consistency
  • Cooling matters more than ever: Keep bulk tank milk below 38°F through summer heat to avoid penalties and secure premium eligibility when margins are tightest

When Coca-Cola commits $650 million to a new Fairlife plant in Webster, New York, it’s a definitive signal that dairy profitability is shifting decisively toward premium, component-driven milk. What strikes me about this moment is how clearly it connects corporate investment to on-farm management—if components are stable and documentation is tight, opportunities expand. If not… the market moves on.

The Sheer Scale: By the Numbers

The Webster facility will span 745,000 square feet and is slated to process 5–7 million pounds of milk per day by late 2025, effectively doubling Fairlife’s current U.S. processing footprint (Arizona, New Mexico, Michigan, Indiana). The common error (and we’ve all seen it) is to translate that to a few thousand cows. That’s wrong.

Let’s put the volume into perspective. A hundredweight (cwt) is 100 pounds. This plant targets 50,000–70,000cwt daily. Assuming an average of 85 pounds per cow/day, the facility will require a consistent daily supply from over 82,000 cows at the upper bound (7,000,000 pounds ÷ 85 pounds per cow ≈ 82,352 cows). Even at 5,000,000lb/day and 75lb/cow/day, that’s still about 66,667 cows. This isn’t a “new customer.” It’s a gravitational shift in the Northeast milk supply, creating very real openings for producers who can deliver spec milk consistently.

This Is Where the Science Hits the Milk Check

Ultrafiltration (UF) separates milk into water, protein, fat, and lactose, then recombines those streams to target specific nutritional profiles (higher protein, lower sugar). This is where the science impacts the milk check. Research on membrane systems in dairy shows that processing efficiency is sensitive to load-to-load composition; when the incoming protein composition varies, fouling and efficiency losses increase, which is precisely why processors prioritize consistency. The University of Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Research documents how UF systems perform best with tight input specs—Fairlife’s process removes most lactose and concentrates protein to deliver the well-known “more protein, less sugar” profile. For premium programs, predictable inputs aren’t optional—they’re the business model.

What’s interesting is how this plays out across plants. Mature EU UF operations report consistently high recoveries and tight process control. The technology isn’t new. Scaling it to this level in the U.S., with consistently spec’d supply, is.

Component Consistency: Your Ticket to a Premium Contract

Here’s the thing, though—processors aren’t paying for averages, they’re paying for repeatability. Cornell PRO-DAIRY guidance recommends targeting somatic cell counts below 200,000 and bulk tank protein consistently above 3.15% for premium lactose-free and UF programs (buyer specifications vary, but this is the general target).

Practical starting point: pull the last 90 days of DHIA reports and calculate protein coefficient of variation (CV). That’s standard deviation divided by mean, times 100. You can easily calculate this in a spreadsheet with test-day data. A lower number indicates more stable and predictable components—exactly what a plant like Webster is looking for. As an operational target, CV ≤ 8% is a sensible threshold that aligns with processor expectations for predictability.

Regional reality check: Producers in the Champlain Valley regularly meet these targets nine months of the year, then struggle to maintain them in July–August when heat stress reduces protein levels and increases SCC levels. That’s when premium eligibility can slip—and it’s often when money is tightest.

The Financial Reality (With Realistic Scenarios)

Farm Credit East’s 2025 Mid-Year Outlook places Northeast operating loan rates around 7.8–8.2%. Getting premium-ready typically requires $125–175/cow for component testing, upgraded cooling, and robust documentation—$62,500–87,500 for a 500-cow herd. That’s a significant capital outlay before adding the management learning curve.

Scenario (transparent, lender-ready):

  • Herd: 500 cows; capex: $75,000 (midpoint of $125–175/cow).
  • Premium: $2.50/cwt net over base on 85% of shipments.
  • Annual milk: assume 80lb/cow/day average x 365 x 500 = 14.6M lb ≈ 146,000cwt.
  • Premium able volume: 85% = 124,100cwt.
  • Incremental revenue: 124,100cwt x $2.50 = $310,250/year.
  • Simple payback: ~$75,000 ÷ $310,250 ≈ 0.24 years (~3 months), before any slippage.

Now, reality: very few herds maintain 85% premiumable volume all year at the full grid, and some premiums come with quality deductions when specs wobble. If consistency drops to 50–60% of shipments, or the effective premium averages $1.50–$2.00/cwt after deductions, payback stretches into the 12–24 month range. Miss the mark completely in summer and push heavy corrections into fall? That’s where 30–36 months starts showing up. The math swings with consistency.

An example from western New York: a herd took SCC from 240,000 to 160,000 in four months. While the premium was welcome, the most immediate financial gain came from eliminating quality penalties—a direct boost to cash flow. That’s often the first win on the road to premium.

Managing Real Risks (Not Just Talking Points)

  • Seasonality: Heat stress and winter housing can disrupt components at precisely the time when premiums matter most. Plan cooling, ration stability, and cow comfort with July and August in mind.
  • Buyer concentration: A single-premium buyer narrows options if the terms change. Always know a credible Plan B for your milk.
  • Rising baseline: As more producers implement quality systems, specs that earn premiums today can become table stakes. Keep improving.

What strikes me is how often “chasing a premium” backfires if the foundation isn’t there. The producers who win invest in consistency first, documentation second, and premium contracts third.

Beyond Fairlife: A Market-Wide Shift to Premium Milk

This development is fascinating because it’s bigger than a plant or a brand. When a global beverage company scales premium dairy infrastructure, it validates demand and margin structure across the category. UF and lactose-free are the lead edge, but the same discipline sets up pathways for A2, grass-fed, and targeted protein profiles.

For New York and Northeast producers within Webster’s trucking radius, the opportunity is real. However, the window for securing the best contract terms will close as early movers secure allocations. Current trends suggest that the next 6–9 months will focus on building a verifiable quality track record, rather than just making calls to procurement.

Next Moves (Start This Week)

  • Pull DHIA data (last 90–180 days), calculate protein CV, and map SCC trend vs. season. Target CV≤8% and SCC<200,000 through summer.
  • Do a cooling audit. Verify bulk tank to truck departure at <38°F during the hottest week; document temperatures daily for 30 days.
  • Sit down with the nutritionist. Lock the ration for 30–45 days, measure DMI, and aim for a 0.05–0.10 point lift in protein with stable variation.
  • Build the paper trail. Maintain a clean, dated file containing DHIA component/SCC trends, temperature logs, and any relevant processor tickets. Procurement teams buy consistency—and proof.

What’s particularly noteworthy is how the “premium future” boils down to basics: consistent components, low SCC, cold milk, and clean records. That’s doable, but it requires discipline for months—not days.

The Bottom Line

Webster isn’t just about capacity. It’s a market signal that North American consumers are ready for the same premium dairy categories that have driven European profitability for years. The producers who treat the next 6–9 months as a readiness period—focusing on component stability, cooling, and documentation—will be positioned to negotiate, not just apply. Start now, before the best terms are taken.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , ,

Price-Fixing Payout: What DFA & Select Milk’s $34.4 Million Settlement Really Means for Dairy

Monday, August 4th, 2025

$34.4M settlement just proved what we suspected: co-ops have been gaming milk pricing for a decade.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Look, here’s what really happened with this DFA thing. These co-ops just paid out $34.4 million because they got caught suppressing what producers should’ve been earning on their milk for over a decade. We’re talking about 8,000 farms across Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Kansas who were getting shortchanged while feed costs kept climbing. The kicker? This settlement forces real transparency within 18 months – meaning you’ll finally see where your milk money actually goes. What gets me excited is the timing… with butterfat hitting 4.0%+ and protein above 3.3% in the Southwest, component premiums are worth serious cash – we’re talking potential $0.50+ per hundredweight if you’ve got the quality to back it up. Plus, those Texas operations adding 40,000 head last year? They’re proving that scale and efficiency still win, especially when you can document everything properly. Bottom line – if you’re not already tracking your components obsessively and keeping bulletproof records, you’re leaving money on the table that this settlement just proved you should’ve been getting all along.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Start documenting everything now – component levels, quality metrics, production costs – because pricing disputes aren’t going away and you need armor-tight records worth potentially $27,500 annually for a 500-cow operation
  • Focus on milk components over volume – Southwest producers hitting 4.0% butterfat and 3.3% protein are commanding real premiums while the settlement forces transparency on how co-ops actually price your milk
  • Diversify your marketing options – regional alliances are letting producers negotiate directly with processors, sidestepping traditional co-op margins while still keeping the services that actually add value
  • Invest in monitoring tech that pays back – automated component tracking systems typically return their cost within two years through premium improvements, and you’ll need this data for the transparency requirements coming in 2026
  • Lock in relationships with multiple buyers – this settlement proves co-ops aren’t untouchable, so having backup marketing agreements protects you when the next pricing “adjustment” comes down the line

The thing about a $34.4 million settlement isn’t that it’s just a big number on paper—it’s a loud wake-up call that the fight for fair milk pricing isn’t over. When Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) and Select Milk Producers handed over this hefty sum to settle price-fixing allegations, it sent a clear message. This matters deeply, at the farm level.

Here’s the deal: this settlement involves about 8,000 producers who marketed milk during the affected timeframe. It just got preliminary judicial approval earlier this month. This settlement directly impacts dairy farms across a wide swath of the Southwest, including Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Kansas—regions where high feed prices have been gnawing at producer margins for years.

A History That Can’t Be Ignored

The core gripe? These co-ops allegedly hobbled competition in milk pricing, paying producers less than what a free market would allow. This isn’t about charging processors more—it’s a pointed concern about the prices paid to the folks milking the cows.

It’s not DFA’s first rodeo on this front. Settlements stretching back include a $140 million Southeast milk price-fixing case, among others, tallying more than $186 million since 2013. Industry analysts have noted that governance issues persist in the way these cooperatives operate.

What’s particularly noteworthy is that Texas’s dairy herd increased by 40,000 head last year, topping 675,000, according to USDA statistics. Now, statistics show impressive growth reflecting broader trends; it’s not a direct result of this settlement, so let’s keep those separate.

What’s Changing with Milk Pricing and Components

The settlement highlights why producers should take their milk component seriously. Nationally, butterfat numbers usually cluster around 3.7-3.8%, but here in the Southwest, those pushing 4.0% butterfat and 3.3% protein are turning heads and pockets because they can claim solid premiums.

According to recent research from the University of Wisconsin, even modest feed efficiency improvements—like 0.1 pounds per day per cow—can save about $25 annually. When you multiply that across your herd, it’s a game changer.

Now, if you’re watching market futures, you’ll notice Class III prices have been volatile lately, bouncing in that $16 to $17 per hundredweight range. That volatility spells opportunity for those who understand it.

The upshot? Cooperatives need to get their acts together pronto—real transparency, real separation of marketing and processing margins—in the next 18 months. For someone milking 500 cows and pushing out 11 million pounds annually, a quarter-dollar premium boost could mean up to $27,500 extra in revenue, assuming quality and consistency are on point.

Getting Smarter About Risk and Regulation

Take hedging strategies, for example. Industry economists are advising producers to micro-hedge explicitly tied to the make allowances of their milk plants. It sounds technical, but think of it as customizing your safety net against weird pricing swings caused by cooperative accounting quirks.

Meanwhile, the USDA is gearing up for Federal Milk Marketing Order reforms, expected in early 2026, that will tighten oversight on these cooperative pricing moves and may restrict long-term exclusivity contracts. More producer voices on cooperative boards seem likely too—especially in places that need them most, like New Mexico.

What You Can Do Right Now

Here’s the thing: you can’t sit back. This settlement serves as a stark reminder to review and update your paperwork and systems. The smart moves right now include:

Documentation that protects your operation — Keep meticulous records of component levels, milk quality, and production costs. This isn’t just good practice anymore; it’s essential armor in the event of pricing disputes.

Technology investments that pay back — Farms investing in automated component monitoring equipment typically see returns within a couple of years through premium improvements. We’re talking systems that help you dial in that consistency buyers reward.

Marketing flexibility beyond the co-op — Regional marketing alliances are becoming the MVPs for volume producers who want to keep their options open while still having co-op benefits where it counts.

Environmental revenue streams — DFA is ahead of the curve with verified carbon credit programs that can add supplemental revenue per cow each year. It’s a growing pocket of opportunity that’s turning a lot of heads.

Looking Ahead

I won’t sugarcoat it; individual payouts from this settlement will vary widely and won’t make anyone rich, but the collective impact will be substantial. It’s reshaping the dairy landscape.

This debate over transparent pricing versus competitive business pragmatism is stirring the pot within cooperatives—and processors hungry for steady, high-quality milk are responding with longer contracts that offer guaranteed premiums. It’s a market that’s changing fast.

This moment isn’t just a bump in the road—it’s a fundamental pivot toward openness and fairness. Co-ops that can’t provide clear value beyond just processing milk are running the risk of losing members and coming under tighter regulatory scrutiny.

The Bottom Line

For producers in the Southwest, the message is clear: get ready to dive deeper into your co-op’s pricing, sharpen your milk component game, and consider marketing partnerships beyond the usual. The milk check you get over the next decade will thank you.

What’s really exciting is watching these waves of change roll in—it’s about fairness, transparency, and getting every pound of milk the credit it deserves.

The Bullvine will be right there with you, delivering the insights you need because here, smart business really is as important as healthy cows.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Uncategorized
Tags : , , ,

Dairy Markets Diverge: US Production Drives Components, While European Herds Contract

Sunday, August 3rd, 2025

The dairy industry in 2025 is splitting into distinct paths, a divergence that breeders, producers, and consultants feel directly.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s what’s happening — the real money isn’t in pumping more milk, it’s in making better milk. US producers figured this out already… they’ve bumped production about 2% while cranking up butterfat and protein levels, adding over $110 per cow straight to the bottom line. Meanwhile, Europe’s struggling with disease outbreaks and shrinking herds, which actually creates opportunities for the rest of us. Feed prices? They’re all over the map, but smart operators are locking in contracts now. Don’t just milk more cows — make every drop work harder through genomics and precision tech. The farms winning in 2025 are the ones making data-driven moves, not just gut decisions.

KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR ACTION

  • Bump your milk protein 0.2% and butterfat 0.3% using genomic selection — we’re talking potentially $120+ more per cow annually. Start by pulling up your herd’s genomic profiles this week.
  • Cut feed waste with precision feeding tech — early adopters report 12% savings on feed costs. Begin with a pilot zone to test and optimize feed intake before rolling it out.
  • Lock in feed prices NOW before the predicted 10% spike hits — call your supplier today about volume contracts. Don’t wait and regret it later.
  • Use real-time monitoring to catch mastitis and lumpy skin early — quick intervention can prevent 5%+ production losses. Disease prevention beats treatment every time.
  • Diversify your milk sales channels to protect against trade chaos — use market intelligence from USDA and Rabobank reports to find new opportunities while others scramble.

Let me break it down for you. The US is absolutely charging ahead right now. According to the latest USDA Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook from July 2025, milk production is expected to reach approximately 228 billion pounds in 2025, with a slight increase to around 229 billion in 2026. But here’s the kicker: it’s not just about adding more cows. Producers are dialing in higher butterfat and protein yields—that’s the new competitive edge that’s propelling American cheese and butter to the top tier globally.

Now look to Europe, where a different reality is unfolding. The EU’s milk output is forecast to decline slightly, from 149.6 million tonnes last year to approximately 149.4 million tonnes this year. The herd is shrinking by an estimated 3 percent, squeezed by tighter environmental controls and soaring costs. Toss in some serious disease outbreaks—such as bluetongue and lumpy skin, particularly affecting Italy and France—and you’ve got producers pivoting hard toward cheese production, where margins still hold solid.

Regional Winners and Losers Keep Emerging

What strikes me about Argentina is how producers there are riding a solid wave. DairyNews reports roughly 11% growth in milk production for the first half of 2025, though much of that surge is feeding growing domestic consumption rather than export markets.

Australia’s story is more nuanced. Despite some conflicting forecasts, multiple sources indicate that production is expected to settle around 8.6 million tonnes for 2025—reflecting the ongoing impacts of drought and rising input costs that continue to squeeze smaller farms out of the market.

In New Zealand, the picture is both steady and unstable. Fonterra’s forecast ranges between NZ$8 and NZ$11 per kg of milk solids for 2025-26, with a midpoint around NZ$10. That volatility means cash flow management has become absolutely essential for Kiwi farmers.

Here’s an interesting twist: the broader economic outlook from the World Bank predicts that commodity prices will soften overall, yet dairy bucks the trend, propped up by tight supplies and robust demand.

Feed Markets and Growing Trade Tensions

Feed markets are painting a mixed picture. The latest forecast from the International Grains Council signals a strong corn crop for 2025-26, although it is flagging volatility driven by weather and biofuel policy shifts. Smart operators are locking in feed prices early—I’ve seen operations save $150-$ 200 per cow annually simply by timing their grain purchases correctly.

But watch out—risks are mounting. Disease challenges like bluetongue and lumpy skin disease continue pressing hard in Europe. Meanwhile, the escalating US-China tariff conflict—which involves tariffs of up to 125% imposed by the US on certain dairy categories and retaliatory tariffs exceeding 120% by China—continues to disrupt traditional trade flows.

What Smart Operators Are Doing Right Now

So, what’s a savvy dairy operator to do in this fractured landscape?

Genomic testing isn’t optional anymore. Focus on breeding for higher fat and protein yields—this is where the real premiums are. A Wisconsin producer I know increased his component premiums by $0.45 per hundredweight just by selecting bulls with superior genetic merit for milk components.

Lock in feed contracts early—don’t get caught off guard by market swings. One Iowa operation saved nearly $180 per cow last year by forward contracting corn when prices dipped in spring.

Embrace precision technology—whether it’s robotic milking systems or precision feeding platforms, the ROI is becoming clearer every quarter. A 1,200-cow California dairy reported a 12% improvement in feed efficiency after installing automated systems.

Monitor disease developments constantly. With what’s happening in Europe, proactive health protocols aren’t just good practice—they’re survival tactics.

Diversify your market strategies—don’t put all your eggs in one basket, especially with trade policies shifting so rapidly.

The margins for error are shrinking; however, the opportunities for those who adapt quickly are substantial. US producers who understand their competitive position in components—the European processors pivoting to maximize value from limited milk, the New Zealand farmers managing cash flow through price volatility—they’re all writing the playbook for what works in this new reality.

For smaller operations, this might mean forming partnerships to access elite genetics and technology. For larger farms, it’s about leveraging scale to implement comprehensive strategies faster than competitors can react.

This isn’t the dairy landscape our grandparents knew. It’s faster, more complex, and honestly, more unforgiving to those who don’t stay ahead of the curve. However, for producers ready to embrace change and think strategically about their positioning, there are real opportunities not only to survive but also to thrive.

The key takeaway? Success in 2025 hinges not only on volume but also on strategic, data-driven decisions that capitalize on regional strengths and navigate global market challenges.

Keep your eyes sharp—this year is shaping up to reshape everything we thought we knew about dairy.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , ,

June Milk Numbers Tell a Story Markets Don’t Want to Hear

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025

5% component-adjusted growth while markets tanked? Something’s broken in how we’re thinking about milk production.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: You know that feeling when good news hits like bad news? That’s exactly what happened with June’s milk production report. We hit 19.23 billion pounds nationally—up 3.3% year-over-year—but markets sold off hard anyway. The real story isn’t the volume; it’s that component-adjusted production surged 5% while geographic production is completely reshuffling. Kansas jumped 19.1% thanks to new processing capacity while Wisconsin barely moved at 0.3%. Meanwhile, butterfat climbed to 4.18% and protein hit 3.25%—those improvements alone are worth serious money per hundredweight. European competitors are struggling with environmental constraints, creating export opportunities, but domestic demand challenges aren’t going away. Here’s the thing: if you’re still thinking volume-first instead of components-plus-location strategy, you’re already behind where this industry’s heading.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Component premiums are the new profit center – With butterfat up 2% and protein up 1.5% year-over-year, focus on genetics and nutrition programs that boost components rather than just volume. That 5% component-adjusted growth versus 3.3% base growth represents real dollars on every milk check.
  • Geography is destiny in 2025 – Plains states with new processing capacity are seeing explosive growth (Kansas +19.1%, Texas +9.5%) while traditional regions stagnate. If you’re planning expansion, secure processing agreements first—capacity constraints are creating 18-24 month margin pressure cycles.
  • Feed cost advantages won’t last forever – Current milk-to-feed ratios around 1.8 are workable, but smart producers are locking grain prices now. Weather, trade issues, or energy costs could flip the equation overnight, so build flexibility into your feed program.
  • Export opportunities exist but don’t count on them – U.S. cheese exports are strong while Europe struggles with environmental limits, but building your whole strategy around international demand is risky. Domestic foodservice demand remains weak, so diversify revenue streams through beef-on-dairy programs.
  • Strategic thinking beats volume obsession – Cornell analysis suggests 75-85% probability of continued margin pressure through early 2026. Winners will be operations that read market signals, optimize for components over volume, and adapt quickly when conditions change.

You know that pit-in-your-stomach feeling when production reports should make you smile, but instead your phone starts buzzing with panicked calls from concerned producers? That’s exactly where we landed when June’s milk numbers dropped. The raw data—19.23 billion pounds nationally, up a whopping 3.3% from last year—should’ve had us popping champagne. Instead, markets sold off sharply, and honestly, that disconnect is telling us everything we need to know about where this industry’s headed.

Monthly U.S. Milk Production Trend for January–June, 2023–2025

When Crushing Expectations Becomes the Market’s Nightmare

What strikes me about June’s numbers is how they caught absolutely everyone off guard. According to the latest StoneX analysis¹, the report was “bearish compared to expectations”—and that’s coming from analysts who eat, sleep, and breathe these numbers.

We didn’t just meet projections… we obliterated them. Most folks were penciling in maybe 2% growth, but here we are staring at production that jumped 3.3% year-over-year. What really gets my attention, though, is how the component story amplifies everything. Our butterfat content increased to 4.18% (up from 4.10% last year), while protein levels rose to 3.25%(up from 3.20%). When you factor in those improvements—and this is crucial for understanding the real market impact—we’re looking at component-adjusted production that surged 5% year-over-year.

Five percent! The last time we saw growth like that? May 2021, right when everything was still bouncing back from pandemic disruptions.

What really caught my attention was the 2,031 pounds per head in June, up 1.7% from the previous year. Now, before anyone gets too carried away, remember that we’re comparing this to a brutal June 2024 when H5N1 absolutely hammered production numbers across key regions. The StoneX folks note we were “lapping over a 1.7% drop last year due to bird flu,” so there’s definitely some recovery built into that figure.

However, here’s the thing that should make everyone pause—we’ve added 114,000 head since December (that’s equivalent to adding several good-sized dairies every month), and we’re still seeing these kinds of individual animal improvements. Mark Stephenson from Wisconsin’s dairy markets program has been tracking these patterns for decades, and as he pointed out in his recent university brief, “when you see both scale and efficiency gains happening together, producers are clearly responding to sustained positive signals… but markets don’t always interpret additional supply as welcome news.”

The Geographic Revolution That’s Rewriting Our Industry Map

What’s happening regionally is what really gets my blood pumping about this data. Producers are “culling fewer dairy cows” because margins have been workable, but that’s just scratching the surface.

Year-over-Year Milk Production Change by State, June 2024-2025

Look at these Plains states numbers and tell me we’re not watching a fundamental restructuring:

  • Texas: jumped 9.5% to 1.503 billion pounds
  • Kansas: posted a jaw-dropping 19.1% increase to 400 million pounds
  • South Dakota: surged 11.5% to 255 million pounds

Meanwhile, traditional regions are struggling:

  • Washington: dropped 9.3% to 475 million pounds
  • California: managed only 2.7% growth despite adding cows
  • Wisconsin: barely budged at 0.3%
Milk Production Composition by Top States in 2025

That Kansas number isn’t some statistical fluke. That’s the new Hilmar cheese facility in Dodge City pulling milk like a powerful magnet. I was talking to a producer near there recently—he’s been shipping to that region for about eighteen months now—and he said the local milk market dynamics have completely changed. Premium pickups, shorter hauls, predictable demand… it’s exactly what every operation wants.

Here’s the thing, though, and this is where it gets uncomfortable for those of us in traditional dairy country. Industry investment exceeding $10 billion is flowing toward areas where operations can actually pencil out profitably. Smart money follows processing capacity, and that capacity is definitely heading south and west.

Brian Gould from UW-Madison doesn’t mince words about this trend; he pointed out that “we’re witnessing the most significant geographic restructuring of U.S. dairy production since the 1970s, but this time it’s being driven by regulatory environment and processing economics, not just feed costs.” That’s a sobering assessment from someone who’s tracked these patterns longer than most of us have been in the business.

The Market Reality Nobody Wants to Face

Now, here’s where the story gets really uncomfortable —and why those market reactions weren’t just traders having a rough day. Despite these impressive production numbers, we face some fundamental demand challenges that are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.

Restaurant traffic still hasn’t bounced back to where we need it. When you consider that over half of America’s food dollars get spent outside the home, weak foodservice demand creates problems that more milk simply can’t solve. Major restaurant chains have been reporting declining traffic in recent quarters, and that ripple effect is felt in cheese demand faster than most people realize.

The Processing Bottleneck That’s Coming for All of Us

What really concerns me—and I’m hearing this from plant managers across multiple regions—is that some facilities are already approaching capacity limits, while others are having to implement milk dumping protocols when volumes exceed what they can handle. We’re seeing this with current production levels, not the higher volumes everyone’s projecting for the rest of .

Recent analysis from Cornell’s Program on Dairy Markets and Policy suggests this kind of regional capacity mismatch typically pressures milk prices for 18 to 24 months until infrastructure catches up or production adjusts. When analysis from sources like Cornell suggests a 75-85% probability of continued margin pressure through early 2026 based on current supply trajectories, that timeline isn’t exactly encouraging news if you’re planning expansions.

Feed Costs Keep Things Manageable… For Now

The one bright spot that’s keeping margins workable? Feed costs haven’t gone completely sideways on us. We’re seeing corn futures trading in the low-four-dollar range, and while protein feeds aren’t cheap, they’re not breaking operations either. That’s maintaining milk-to-feed ratios around 1.8, which most producers can work with.

I was just talking to a guy running 850 cows in central Wisconsin who locked corn back in May when planting conditions looked sketchy. Smart move. He’s feeling pretty good about that decision while watching grain markets bounce around this summer.

But here’s what worries me… feed cost advantages can disappear faster than a fresh cow’s peak production drops off. Weather patterns, trade disruptions, energy costs—any of these could flip the equation pretty quickly.

What This Actually Means for Your Bottom Line

Looking ahead—and this is where three decades in this business starts showing—I don’t think this greater than 3% growth rate continues much longer. The StoneX analysis confirms what most agricultural economists are projecting: we’ll moderate toward 2% growth as we face tougher year-ago comparisons and seasonal heat stress hits those expanding Plains herds.

If you’re operating in traditional dairy regions, Focus on efficiency gains over cow numbers. This geographic shift is real, and trying to counter it by simply adding more animals might not be the most effective approach. The data shows Wisconsin barely growing while Kansas explodes—that should tell you something about where competitive advantages lie.

If you’re in one of those growth regions, Be strategic about it. Just because you can expand doesn’t mean you should do so without first locking in processing agreements. When forward-looking models show a 60-70% probability of regional capacity mismatches continuing through 2026, securing those relationships becomes critical.

Regardless of where you are, Start taking component premiums seriously if you haven’t already. Those butterfat and protein numbers aren’t just statistics on your milk check—they’re becoming the difference between profit and loss. When component-adjusted production is growing at 5% while base volume grows at 3.3%, that spread represents significant financial gains.

What’s interesting about the export picture is that U.S. cheese exports have been hitting strong levels recently while European production struggles with environmental constraints. When your competitors can’t produce, opportunities definitely emerge. But counting on exports to bail us out of domestic oversupply? That’s a risky way to build a business model.

It’s essential to remember that export markets can shift more rapidly than domestic production can adjust. Building a business model that depends entirely on international demand is like farming without crop insurance—it might work until it doesn’t.

The Bottom Line: Strategic Thinking Beats Volume Every Time

If you’re making production decisions for the next 18 months, here’s what I’m telling producers: forget about filling every stall or pushing every cow to maximum output. The operations I see thriving aren’t just focused on making more milk—they’re making smarter milk.

Key strategic moves that separate successful operations:

  • Prioritize components over volume (those 2% butterfat and 1.5% protein gains matter more than total pounds)
  • Secure solid processing relationships before expanding (capacity constraints are real)
  • Diversify revenue streams (beef-on-dairy programs have become essential, not optional)
  • Build financial flexibility to weather market volatility (18-24 month margin pressure cycles are becoming the norm)

What I’ve learned over the years is that producers who understand market signals, position themselves strategically, and build operations that can adapt when conditions change—and they always do—those are the ones that remain standing when the dust settles.

This June report confirms that we have the technical ability to produce milk like never before. The real question facing our industry is whether we’ve got the wisdom to produce it profitably in a market that’s sending us some pretty clear signals about supply, demand, and where we’re headed.

Honestly? I think that’s the conversation we should be having, rather than just celebrating production records. Because right now, with component-adjusted production up 5% and markets selling off anyway, the story being told is one we might not want to hear… but we’d better start listening.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

  • Unlocking Component Gold: Are You Feeding for Fat and Protein, or Just Volume? – This tactical guide moves beyond why you need higher components to how you achieve them. It offers practical feeding and management strategies for immediately boosting butterfat and protein, directly impacting your milk check and profitability.
  • The Dairy Industry’s New Math: Are You Ready For The Change? – With the main article forecasting margin pressure and geographic shifts, this piece provides the strategic financial playbook you need. It details the key performance indicators (KPIs) that top herds use to build resilience and weather market volatility.
  • Beef on Dairy: A Trend That’s Here to Stay – The main article flags beef-on-dairy as essential. This piece breaks down the economics of this strategy, revealing how to leverage terminal genetics and market knowledge to transform your calf program from a cost center into a significant revenue stream.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : USDA Dairy Production Report
Tags : , , , ,

Why Smart Dairy Producers Are Riding the Premium Wave While Plant-Based Takes a Hit

Monday, July 21st, 2025

Plant-based milk just dropped 4.9% while premium dairy jumped 44%. Time to rethink your positioning strategy, friend.

Executive Summary: Look, I’ve been watching this shift for months now, and the producers who pivot to premium positioning while everyone else panics about alternatives are going to clean up. We’re talking about a 44% growth in premium dairy segments while plant-based sales dropped nearly 5% — that’s not a blip, that’s a trend.The math’s pretty simple: farms focusing on component optimization and direct-to-consumer strategies are seeing payback periods of 18-24 months, with some operations adding $2,000+ per cow annually. What’s happening globally isn’t just about taste preferences… it’s about trust, nutrition, and consumers willing to pay for quality when they understand what they’re getting.Your feed costs aren’t getting cheaper, and milk prices aren’t getting more stable — but premium positioning gives you margin protection that commodity thinking never will. You should be testing this approach in the next 90 days, because this window won’t stay open forever.

Key Takeaways

  • Component premiums are real money right now — producers hitting 4.2%+ butterfat and 3.3%+ protein are seeing $0.50-$1.00/cwt premiums. Start with precision feeding programs and track your DHI results monthly. In 2025’s tight margins, these components literally pay for the feed adjustments.
  • Direct sales can double your milk value — farmers markets and restaurant partnerships are paying $6-8/gallon versus your $2.10/gallon blend price. Test with 10% of production first, focus on local establishments that value provenance. The consumer education investment pays back in 8-12 months.
  • Robotic systems aren’t just about labor anymore — they’re data goldmines for premium positioning stories. Those $300K investments generate 15-20% better udder health tracking and give you the consistency metrics premium buyers want. Think storytelling tool, not just milking equipment.
  • Feed efficiency gains of 7-12% are achievable this year — precision feeding programs cost $15K-$50K per 100 cows but payback in 2.5-3 years through better conversions. Start by tracking your current feed-to-milk ratios, then optimize your TMR based on actual production data.
  • Consumer retreat from alternatives creates opening — 57% cite taste/texture issues with plant-based products, 67% worry about processing. Use this skepticism to position your farm’s traditional methods as premium advantages. The marketing practically writes itself.

You know that feeling when you’re watching a market shift happen in real time? That’s exactly what’s unfolding in dairy right now — and if you’re not paying attention, you’re missing what could be the biggest repositioning opportunity I’ve seen in years.

The thing about consumer preferences: they can turn on a dime, but when they do, the smart money follows fast. I’ve been tracking these consumer migration patterns for months now, and honestly? The reversal has been more dramatic than most of us expected.

We’re seeing refrigerated plant-based milk sales drop 4.9% to $2.5 billion in 2024 while premium high-protein dairy in the UK posted a staggering 44% growth, hitting £117 million in 2023. What strikes me about this shift isn’t just the numbers — it’s what they reveal about where consumers are actually placing their trust.

This isn’t just about market data, however. According to recent consumer research, taste and texture remain significant barriers to the adoption of plant-based products, while concerns about processing are growing among consumers who want to understand what they’re consuming. That’s not a small segment we’re talking about — that’s mainstream consumer skepticism hitting a tipping point.

2024 Sales Change: Decline in Plant-Based Milk vs Growth in Premium High-Protein Dairy

What’s Really Happening on Farms (The Part Everyone’s Missing)

Here’s the thing, though… This plays out differently across regions, and the producers who are aware of this are already positioning themselves.

One Central Valley producer I spoke with recently — has been running about 1,200 cows for the better part of two decades — has been watching Coca-Cola’s $650 million Fairlife investment with keen interest.

“Ultra-premium positioning works, but you need serious marketing investment and supply chain coordination to get there.”

With ag lending rates where they are right now (and trust me, we’re all feeling that pinch), the smart approach isn’t jumping in headfirst — it’s gradual transitions that build on existing strengths. Are you already producing above-average components? That’s your starting point right there.

What’s particularly noteworthy is how efficiency plays into this premium positioning. Another producer up in Wisconsin has been implementing precision feeding strategies, and from what I’m hearing around the industry, the improvements in feed conversion aren’t just about saving costs anymore — they’re about creating the foundation for premium product positioning. His payback timeline? About eighteen to twenty-four months at current milk price levels.

The math works like this: when you can dial in your butterfat numbers and protein content through precision nutrition, you’re not just optimizing for commodity pricing—you’re creating the quality foundation that enables premium market positioning. And in today’s market, that margin difference is everything.

New Zealand’s Reality Check (And What It Means for All of Us)

If you want to see premium dairy pricing power in action, look at what’s happening down in New Zealand. Butter prices reached NZ$8.42 for a 500g block in May 2025 — a 51% annual increase, and consumers are still buying. That tells you something profound about demand elasticity when you’re dealing with a quality product.

Industry analysts tracking dairy commodities have noted that we’re seeing pricing power in quality segments that we haven’t witnessed since the early 2000s organic boom. However, what’s truly fascinating about the New Zealand situation is… it’s not just about scarcity pricing.

Their producers have spent decades developing quality systems, genetic programs, and processing capabilities that support their premium positioning. When global buyers want superior butterfat and protein levels, they’re willing to pay for it. And that premium gets passed back through the supply chain.

Corporate Course Corrections (This Is Where It Gets Interesting)

What’s interesting is watching how the big players are pivoting. Remember when everyone was rushing into a plant-based diet? Well, Lactalis just announced they’re shutting down their Sudbury plant-based operations by December 2025 — barely a year after reopening it with government support. That’s not market volatility; that’s informed resource allocation based on what’s actually moving off shelves.

Meanwhile, according to organic industry reports, organic milk volumes continue to grow at rates that significantly outpace those of conventional milk. But here’s the catch — organic certification still takes 3-5 years. So, if you’re considering premium positioning, the time to start planning is now, not when you see the opportunity fully developed.

According to McKinsey & Company’s latest survey of dairy executives, 69% of industry leaders now prioritize cost management, while 65% plan to increase investment in product innovation over the next three to five years. That’s not contradictory thinking — that’s strategic positioning for margin expansion.

What does this tell us about where the smart money is going? They’re not just cutting costs; they’re investing in differentiation while managing expenses. Big difference.

Regional Opportunities: Where Your Operation Fits

RegionPrimary OpportunityInvestment FocusMarket Characteristics
EuropeSustainability messagingAdvanced feeding tech, organic certification70% parent concern about dairy nutrition
North AmericaDirect-to-consumer premiumLocal partnerships, component optimizationStrong farmers market culture
Asia-PacificExport positioningCold chain logistics, quality systems2-2.5% annual consumption growth

European Sustainability Messaging

In Europe, something interesting is happening with sustainability positioning within the conventional dairy sector. Recent research shows that significant percentages of parents remain concerned about the nutritional implications of removing dairy from children’s diets — about 70% of French parents, according to recent studies. This is a powerful endorsement for the traditional role of dairy in family nutrition.

They’re also investing in technologies that matter. Industry reports suggest that advanced feeding strategies can significantly improve efficiency, with payback periods averaging 2.5-3.5 years for well-planned implementations.

The implementation costs vary widely, ranging from $15,000 to $50,000 per 100-cow operation, depending on the system and region. That’s real money, but it’s also real results when you factor in both cost savings and quality improvements.

Asia-Pacific: The Long Game

Now, the Asia-Pacific region represents a significant portion of global dairy consumption, and China continues to show growth in per capita dairy consumption, creating pricing pressure that flows back to all of us. Even if you’re never shipping overseas, those demand patterns affect your farmgate price.

The challenge there lies in navigating complex cold chain logistics and establishing consumer trust in foreign dairy products. However, what most people overlook is that successful market entry typically requires 18-24 months of lead time and partnerships with established local distributors.

The volume potential, though? China represents a significant opportunity for growth, transitioning from current consumption levels to those of developed markets. That’s a massive opportunity if you can figure out the logistics. Are any of you exploring export opportunities? Because the window might be wider than you think.

Implementation Reality: What Works (And What Doesn’t)

Investment TypeCost RangePayback PeriodKey Benefits
Precision Feeding$15K-$50K per 100 cows2.5-3.5 years7-12% feed efficiency improvement, reduced input costs, improved component consistency
Robotic Milking Systems$200K-$500K per systemVariable, high upfront cost30% labor efficiency gains, detailed production tracking, premium positioning support
Consumer Education Programs~25% over initial marketing budget8-12 monthsEnhanced market understanding, improved customer acquisition, supports premium pricing
Direct-to-Consumer SalesLow startup costs8-12 monthsDouble milk value ($6-8/gal vs $2.10/gal), stronger customer relationships

Feed Cost Reality Check

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: feed cost volatility. Seasonal swings can be brutal — I was just talking to producers in Wisconsin who were severely impacted by corn silage quality issues last harvest. When your premium positioning depends on consistent milk components, that variability is… well, it’s brutal.

The operations that are succeeding? They’re establishing feed cost hedging strategies and maintaining margin buffers. That sounds conservative, but it’s what keeps you in the premium game when markets get choppy.

One producer told me:

“We started treating component consistency like a quality control issue rather than just hoping the cows would deliver. Changed everything about how we approach nutrition planning.”

Component LevelPremium RangeMarket ImpactImplementation Strategy
Butterfat 4.2%+$0.50-$1.00/cwtImmediate premium pricingPrecision feeding, genetic selection
Protein 3.3%+$0.50-$1.00/cwtEnhanced cheese-making valueTMR optimization, breed focus
Combined Premium$1.00-$2.00/cwtMaximum market positioningIntegrated approach, consistent monitoring

Technology Timing (This Is Where It Gets Tricky)

Here’s something that’s been on my mind… robotic milking systems show significant labor efficiency improvements, but the capital requirements are still major barriers for many operations. The producers I’m seeing succeed aren’t rushing into technology for technology’s sake — they’re aligning tech adoption with premium positioning goals.

Are you looking at automation as a labor solution or as part of your premium positioning strategy? There’s a significant difference in ROI depending on how you approach it.

Consider this: if your robotic system provides you with better udder health data, more consistent milking intervals, and detailed cow-level production tracking, you’re not just saving labor costs — you’re laying the groundwork for premium quality claims.

Success Story: What Premium Positioning Actually Looks Like

Ruth and Stephen Ashley at Meadow Bank Farm caught my attention at the recent CREAM Awards. They’ve transformed their operation into a model of efficiency, hitting 15,000 liters annually per cow with a 120-cow herd. What’s most significant isn’t just the production numbers — it’s how they’ve integrated four Lely robots while maintaining work-life balance.

“We’re not chasing technology. We’re chasing sustainability — both environmental and financial.”

Their selective dry cow therapy means 89% of cows only receive teat sealant, and their mastitis management keeps problems minimal. That’s the kind of operational excellence that enables premium positioning. They’re not just producing milk — they’re producing data, consistency, and quality metrics that tell a story consumers will pay for.

However, what really impressed me about their approach was that they didn’t try to revolutionize everything at once. They focused on getting their systems right first, then built the premium positioning on top of that solid foundation. A smart sequence.

Where Do You Start? (The 90-Day Reality Check)

So how do you actually capitalize on this? Here’s what I’m seeing work consistently:

  1. Month 1: Evaluate Your Foundation. Start by assessing your current butterfat and protein numbers. Are they above average? Can you improve them through genetics or nutrition changes? If you’re already producing premium components, you may be closer to achieving a premium positioning than you think.
  2. Month 2: Test the Market. Launch limited premium product tests — perhaps through direct sales to local restaurants or at a farmers market. Start small — the key is learning what resonates with your local consumer base without making major infrastructure investments.
  3. Month 3: Scale and Educate. Expand on what’s working while building consumer education around your value proposition. This is where many operations stumble — they don’t invest enough in explaining why their product commands a premium.

Consumer education costs typically run higher than initial projections (this appears to be a consistent trend across regions), but successful premium brands see customer acquisition costs pay back within 8-12 months through enhanced margins. The key is patience and consistency — not every marketing dollar pays off immediately, but the cumulative effect builds powerful brand recognition over time.

What questions are you asking yourself about your own operation right now? Because that’s usually where the best opportunities hide.

The Bottom Line: Why This Matters Now

What’s most significant about this shift is that it’s not just about riding a trend — it’s about building sustainable competitive advantages through operational excellence and a clear value proposition. Consumer retreat from alternatives is creating opportunities that won’t last forever.

Are you positioning your operation to benefit from these market dynamics? Because the window for establishing premium market positioning is open right now, but it won’t stay that way indefinitely. The butterfat numbers don’t lie, and neither do consumer preferences.

The producers who understand this shift and act on it strategically — they’re the ones who’ll thrive over the next decade. What strikes me as fascinating is how this isn’t really about choosing between technology and tradition, or between local and global markets.

It’s about understanding that consumers will pay for quality when they understand what they’re getting. The question is whether you’re ready to deliver that quality and tell that story effectively.

Between you and me, the evidence is clear: there’s never been a better time to be producing really good milk. The challenge isn’t the market opportunity — it’s having the systems and storytelling capability to capture it.

Bottom line? This isn’t about fighting plant-based… it’s about capturing the premium market they accidentally created for us.

What are you doing this week to find out where you fit in? And more importantly… what’s stopping you from taking that first step toward premium positioning? Let me know in the comments below.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

  • The Secret to High Components: It’s Not Just Genetics, It’s Strategy – This piece offers practical, actionable strategies for optimizing your herd’s nutrition. It moves beyond theory to reveal specific feed management techniques you can implement immediately to boost butterfat and protein, directly impacting your premium potential and profitability.
  • Beyond the Milk Check: Decoding 2025’s Dairy Market Realities – Go deeper into the economic forces shaping today’s dairy landscape. This analysis breaks down the market fundamentals, pricing models, and risk factors for 2025, helping you build a resilient business strategy that capitalizes on long-term consumer trends.
  • Genetics in the Premium Era: Are You Breeding for the Right Traits? – Discover how strategic genetic selection is the ultimate tool for premium positioning. This article explores which traits—from A2 beta-casein to specific milk proteins—are driving value and how to build a breeding program that future-proofs your herd’s profitability.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Industry
Tags : , , ,

America’s Butterfat Tsunami: How Smart Dairy Farmers Are Riding the Wave of 2025’s Component Revolution

Sunday, May 25th, 2025

Butterfat tsunami! 82M extra lbs are crushing old dairy models. Are you sinking or surfing? Your farm’s future depends on it. Time to wake up!

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. dairy industry is drowning in an unprecedented 82 million pounds of extra butterfat from Q1 2025 alone, a “fat revolution” that’s making the old playbook of chasing milk volume obsolete. While butter production has surged to absorb some of this creamy deluge, cratering ice cream demand is leaving even more sloshing around. This forces a make-or-break reliance on exports, particularly for cheese and butter, to prevent a catastrophic price collapse. For dairy farmers, this isn’t just another market swing; it’s a fundamental restructuring where focusing on component optimization, aggressive risk management, and shrewd contract negotiation is no longer optional but essential for survival. Clinging to outdated volume-centric strategies is a direct path to financial ruin in this new, fat-driven dairy economy.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • The Volume Game is OVER: Prioritizing milk volume over component production (fat and protein) is a failing strategy in 2025’s butterfat-flooded market.
  • Adapt or Perish – Components are KING: Dairy farmers must aggressively optimize for butterfat and protein through genetics, nutrition, and management to capture premiums and remain profitable.
  • Export Lifeline is Non-Negotiable: The U.S. dairy industry’s stability now critically hinges on robust export markets for butter and cheese; any disruption spells domestic disaster.
  • Get Smart or Get Out – Rethink Everything: It’s imperative to audit milk contracts for component incentives, implement rigorous risk management (DMC, DRP, hedging), and align production with processor and export demands.
Dairy butterfat surplus, milk components, U.S. dairy 2025, dairy export strategy, cream prices

While the industry establishment wrings its hands over what to do with an unprecedented 82 million pounds of extra butterfat from Q1 alone, forward-thinking producers are leveraging this “fat revolution” to build resilience, capture premiums, and secure their future. The old playbook of chasing milk volume is dead- are you still following it?

The numbers don’t lie, and they’re jaw-dropping. American dairy cows are pumping out butterfat like never before, with first-quarter 2025 production shooting up by 82 million pounds, a 3.4% surge compared to Q1 2024. This isn’t a temporary blip but the culmination of a decades-long genetic revolution that’s fundamentally transformed what comes out of our cows.

Butterfat levels have vaulted from 3.70% to 4.40% over the past 20 years, while protein has climbed from 3.06% to 3.40%. This relentless pursuit of components has completely rewritten the economics of dairy farming. In Iowa, for example, producers are averaging a whopping 4.44% butterfat, delivering hundreds of millions of pounds of fat worth approximately $1.3 billion to processors.

What’s driving this component explosion? It’s a perfect storm of selective breeding, precision nutrition, and management practices all laser-focused on solids rather than volume. Recent USDA data shows March 2025 milk production increasing by a modest 0.9% compared to March 2024, with an additional 8,000 dairy cows bringing the national herd to 9.373 million head. But that production increase masks the real story, components are growing at a pace that’s utterly transforming milk’s composition and value.

The component revolution isn’t just changing milk- it’s reshaping the dairy manufacturing landscape and creating winners and losers throughout the supply chain. Like a farmer who spent decades selecting for high-yielding corn only to discover the market suddenly values protein content more than bushels per acre, dairy producers who focused solely on milk volume are finding themselves on the wrong side of this revolution.

Butter Production Surges, But Can’t Keep Pace with Fat Tsunami

Butter churns have been working overtime trying to absorb America’s cream surplus. Year-to-date butter production through March hit nearly 650 million pounds, jumping 5% compared to the same period in 2024 (adjusted for leap year). This increased production consumed an additional 25 million pounds of butterfat compared to last year, but it’s still not enough to handle all the extra fat flooding the system.

The latest USDA Dairy Products report shows March butter production reached 229 million pounds, an impressive 8.6% increase from March 2024 and 12.9% higher than February 2025. Butter manufacturers have been aggressively churning, motivated by ample cream supplies and strong export opportunities created by America’s significant price advantage in global markets.

Cream has been so abundant that multiple pricing mechanisms for cream relative to butter hit rock-bottom levels earlier this spring. Cream was trading at “fire-sale” prices, with multiples occasionally dropping below 1.00, making it cheaper than its intrinsic butterfat value. This created exceptional margins for butter manufacturers who could access this bargain-priced cream.

While cream multiples have begun to tick upward with the start of ice cream season, supplies remain plentiful for makers of fat-heavy dairy products, creating opportunities for processors who can quickly adjust their production strategies to capitalize on this abundance.

Shifting Fat Utilization: Why Ice Cream’s Stumble Matters

While butter production surged, several traditional butterfat users significantly reduced their consumption, contributing to the cream surplus. Most notably, ice cream makers dramatically pulled back production, with regular ice cream volumes plummeting 7.9% year-over-year in March to 60.3 million gallons. This steep decline meant 2.8 million pounds less butterfat was used in regular ice cream compared to March 2024.

The situation was even worse for low-fat ice cream, where March production of 35.4 million gallons represented an 8.9% year-over-year drop, releasing another 937,000 pounds of butterfat into an already saturated market. This unexpected weakness in ice cream production, typically a seasonal bright spot for cream utilization, exacerbated the butterfat surplus situation.

Similarly, cream cheese and Neufchatel production (with their hefty 34.44% milkfat content) fell by 6.3 million pounds year-to-date through March compared to the same period in 2024. This decline freed up an additional 2.2 million pounds of butterfat, further contributing to the surplus.

However, there have been some positive developments. Natural American cheese varieties, which have higher fat content than mozzarella, saw increased production year-to-date through March 2025. This growth absorbed approximately 15 million pounds of additional butterfat, relieving the oversupplied market.

The message is clear: traditional patterns of butterfat utilization are shifting rapidly, and both farmers and processors must adapt to these new realities or risk being caught on the wrong side of a fundamental market restructuring. It’s much like balancing a TMR ration when your forage analysis suddenly changes- the entire formula needs recalibration to reach optimal performance.

Exports: America’s Critical Pressure Release Valve

Here’s an uncomfortable truth many dairy leaders won’t admit publicly: without robust exports, the entire U.S. dairy pricing structure would collapse under the weight of our component surplus. With domestic butterfat production vastly outpacing consumption, export markets have become essential to maintaining market balance. In January and February 2025, U.S. butter exports totaled 18.6 million pounds, an extraordinary 84% increase over the same period in 2024 and the highest two-month start since 2014.

This export surge has been driven by America’s substantial price advantage in global markets. U.S. butter has been trading at over $1 per pound below global competitors in early 2025, creating an irresistible opportunity for international buyers. February butter exports alone jumped 126% year-over-year to 11.5 million pounds.

Similarly, cheese exports have been robust, with February export value surging 14% to $223.7 million. Strong growth markets included South Korea (volume up 40%), Japan (volume up 10%), Australia (volume up 37%), and Canada (volume up 19%).

However, this export success comes with significant risks. The current U.S. price advantage is directly tied to our domestic surplus- if global market conditions shift or trade barriers emerge, this critical outlet could quickly contract. Dairy industry leaders are actively working to maintain and expand market access, but geopolitical uncertainties, including potential new tariffs and complications from H5N1 testing requirements, threaten this vital pressure release valve.

Why aren’t more dairy farms developing export-oriented strategies? The butterfat tsunami has transformed exports from a “nice-to-have” market opportunity into an absolute necessity for maintaining domestic market balance. If export channels constrict, the consequences for U.S. dairy prices could be severe and immediate. It’s analogous to a farm that has expanded its milking herd but depends entirely on a single milk hauler- if that truck doesn’t show up, you’ve nowhere to put tomorrow’s production.

Price Outlook: Navigating Choppy Waters Ahead

The surge in butterfat production and resulting cream surplus have inevitably impacted dairy commodity prices and forecasts. The USDA’s April 2025 forecast for the all-milk price stands at $21.10 per hundredweight, down significantly from earlier projections. Class III milk prices are forecasted at $17.60/cwt, with Class IV at $18.20/cwt-both, both considerably lower than previous estimates.

For butter specifically, the USDA’s latest forecast puts 2025 prices at $2.445 per pound, substantially below global competitors, maintaining America’s export advantage but pressuring domestic returns. CME spot butter prices have hovered around $2.30-$2.33/lb, reflecting the abundant cream supply.

One bright spot for producers is the expectation of lower feed costs in 2025 compared to 2024, providing some relief to farm margins. Corn, soybean meal, and alfalfa hay prices are trending lower than in 2024, creating opportunities for producers to lock in favorable feed contracts and partially offset declining milk prices.

The component pricing system continues to favor high-solids milk, with butterfat valued at approximately $2.62 per pound under Federal Milk Marketing Order pricing. This underscores the growing economic imperative to maximize component production rather than simply milk volume, a message too many producers are still ignoring at their peril.

For the remainder of 2025, we can expect continued downward pressure on prices unless either export demand accelerates beyond current projections or domestic production moderates. The projected increase in cheese processing capacity coming online later this year may provide some support, but could also generate additional whey, potentially pressuring those markets.

Strategic Imperatives for Modern Dairy Farmers

Smart producers aren’t just watching this butterfat tsunami- they’re actively positioning their operations to ride the wave. Are you implementing these critical strategies, or are you still farming like it’s 2015? Here’s what leading farmers are doing right now:

  1. Component Optimization: Top operators are doubling down on genetics and nutrition to maximize fat and protein percentages. Every 0.1% increase in butterfat can add $0.15- indices that emphasize fat and protein PTA values, not just production PTAs. Consider breeds like Jerseys, Brown Swiss, or strategic crossbreeding programs that naturally excel in component production.
  2. Strategic Risk Management: With projected all-milk prices below $21.60/cwt, operations producing less than 24,000 pounds per cow annually may struggle to maintain profitability unless they aggressively manage risk. Lock in current favorable feed prices and utilize Dairy Margin Coverage and Dairy Revenue Protection programs to establish price floors. Think of these tools as the financial equivalent of a well-designed freestall barn-they won’t make you rich, but they’ll keep you protected when conditions turn harsh.
  3. Contract Optimization: Immediately audit your milk contracts to understand and maximize component premiums. Some processors offer significantly better component incentives than others, with premiums for butterfat ranging from 110% to 125% of Federal Order minimums depending on their product mix. Are you shipping to the same processor you’ve used for decades without exploring alternatives? Switching buyers could substantially impact your bottom line in this high-component environment.
  4. Production Efficiency: Focus relentlessly on feed efficiency and labor productivity. With milk prices under pressure, controlling costs becomes even more critical. Evaluate automation opportunities to address rising labor costs and consider postponing major capital expenditures until market conditions improve. Monitor your feed conversion efficiency (FCE) and income over feed cost (IOFC) metrics weekly rather than monthly.
  5. Processor Alignment: Understand the strategic focus of your milk processor. They’ll likely continue to value high-component milk if they’re primarily producing cheese or butter for export markets. Aligning your production with their needs can help secure better pricing or more stable market access. You should tailor your herd’s component profile to match your processor’s end products, as you’d select different corn hybrids for silage versus grain.

The Road Ahead: Navigating 2025’s Dairy Terrain

The current butterfat surplus isn’t a temporary anomaly- it’s the new normal in U.S. dairy. For the remainder of 2025, we expect continued high component production, volatile commodity prices, and absolute dependence on export markets to maintain balance.

Several key factors will shape the landscape:

  1. Processing Capacity Expansion: A significant new cheese processing capacity is scheduled to come online in 2025, potentially increasing demand for milk components. Michigan, Wisconsin, and Idaho facilities will add hundreds of millions of pounds of annual cheese production capacity. However, these plants will generate additional whey, which faces export challenges due to Chinese tariffs and other trade factors.
  2. HPAI Concerns: The ongoing presence of avian influenza in dairy herds remains a concern, potentially impacting milk volumes in affected states such as California and Texas and influencing export protocols. Biosecurity measures have never been more important, with many co-ops requiring comprehensive plans like those implemented during the FMD scares of previous decades.
  3. Global Dairy Market Dynamics: Rabobank forecasts modest global milk supply growth of 0.8% in 2025 across major exporting regions, which should help maintain relatively firm global dairy prices if U.S. production remains competitive. China’s forecast for reduced domestic milk production (-2.6% YoY) could influence its import demand for dairy products.
  4. Consumer Behavior: Evolving consumer preferences, including health and wellness trends, continue to impact demand for products like ice cream. The trend toward more at-home meal consumption could bolster grocery sales of dairy products, though foodservice demand has shown some weakness in early 2025.

The harsh reality is that the rules of the dairy game have fundamentally changed. The component revolution isn’t just another market cycle- it’s a structural transformation that requires new thinking and strategies. Have you made the necessary adjustments to your operation, or are you still clinging to outdated models prioritizing volume over components?

For producers who adapt quickly, focusing on component optimization, export-oriented production, and sophisticated risk management, the current market presents opportunities despite its challenges. The road ahead will be increasingly difficult for those who cling to outdated volume-focused models.

The Bottom Line

The butterfat tsunami is here. The question isn’t whether it will impact your operation, whether you’ll be crushed by the wave or learn to ride it to greater profitability and sustainability.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. A seemingly modest $1.00/cwt drop in the all-milk price can slash annual revenue by $125,000 for a 500-cow dairy producing 25,000 pounds per cow. That’s the difference between profitability and financial distress for many operations.

However, this component-driven market also creates unprecedented opportunities for those who adapt. As progressive dairy farmers once shifted from tie-stall barns to freestall facilities or conventional milking parlors to robotics, today’s successful operators will pivot from volume-focused production to component-maximizing strategies. The genetics, nutrition, and management knowledge to dramatically boost butterfat and protein production exists today. The processors and export markets hungry for these components are actively seeking suppliers. The tools for effective risk management are available.

It’s time to choose- continuing business as usual is not an option. Will you reinvent your operation to thrive in the component economy, or will you be one of the operations that don’t survive this transformation? Take action now:

  1. Schedule a meeting with your nutritionist and geneticist on component enhancement strategies.
  2. Evaluate your milk marketing options and contact multiple processors to compare component premiums.
  3. Implement a formal risk management program that protects your milk price and input costs.
  4. Attend export-focused dairy seminars to understand how global markets will impact your farm, even if you never ship products internationally.

The future belongs to those who recognize that the butterfat revolution isn’t a threat but an opportunity you dare to change. What will you do differently tomorrow?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Industry
Tags : , , ,

THE GREAT DAIRY MIGRATION: April’s Production Surge Reveals Who’s Winning and Losing in America’s New Milk Map

Wednesday, May 21st, 2025

Texas herds surge 10.6% as US milk production hits 3-year high. Component-adjusted output up 3% – what it means for dairy margins.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: April 2025 saw U.S. milk production jump 1.5% year-over-year – the largest gain since 2022 – driven by a 89,000-cow herd expansion and rising yields. Texas dominated growth with a 10.6% output surge, while Idaho’s 4.2% rise faced emerging H5N1 risks. Component-adjusted production soared 3%, amplifying manufacturing potential despite California’s lingering avian flu challenges. Markets reacted bearishly as Class III futures dropped 20¢, signaling concerns about sustained oversupply. The data reveals a geographic shift, with Southern Plains states outpacing traditional dairy regions.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Historic expansion: 102K cows added in 10 months, pushing herds to 9.4M head – highest since mid-2021.
  • Texas powerhouse: 50K new cows + 55 lb/cow yield gain = 10.6% production spike.
  • Component revolution: 4.31% fat (+1.7%) and 3.34% protein (+1.2%) created 3% manufacturing value surge.
  • Regional realignment: Kansas (+11.4%) and South Dakota (+9.2%) boom as Washington (-4.5%) and Florida (-3.7%) contract.
  • Market warning: Bearish price reactions signal oversupply risks if demand doesn’t match 2%+ component-adjusted growth.
U.S. milk production, dairy herd expansion, milk components, Texas dairy, April 2025 dairy report

April 2025’s milk production statistics aren’t just another monthly data point—they’re the smoking gun confirming a fundamental restructuring of America’s dairy landscape. The 1.5% production surge (3.0% on a component basis) reveals how rapidly production power is shifting south and west, creating winners and losers in an industry transformation many producers aren’t prepared to acknowledge, much less address. USDA’s latest data confirms that the production center is shifting dramatically away from traditional dairy states toward regions that many “experts” dismissed as unsustainable just a decade ago.

The Numbers That Shatter Conventional Wisdom

Let’s be brutally honest about what April’s milk production report tells us. The nationwide 1.5% production increase compared to April 2024 doesn’t just mark the fourth consecutive month of rising output—it represents the most substantial year-over-year percentage gain since August 2022, according to USDA data released May 21, 2025.

What should make you sit up straight is the component-adjusted production increase of 3.0% that vastly outpaced the raw volume growth. This isn’t just more milk—it’s dramatically more valuable milk, with fat content reaching 4.31% (up 1.7% from last year) and protein climbing to 3.34% (up 1.2%).

When was the last time anyone in your cooperative meeting mentioned that component-adjusted production was growing at double the volume rate? It’s like celebrating a 200-bushel corn crop while ignoring that the test weight jumped from 56 to 58 pounds per bushel. The manufacturing value of America’s milk supply is expanding at a rate that’s reshaping processing economics in ways many industry observers seem determined to ignore.

This wasn’t supposed to happen. Market analysts had predicted a modest 1.2% growth. Instead, producers delivered an expansion that sent Class III futures and cheese prices tumbling approximately 20 cents in nearby months. When the market pundits and economists consistently underestimate production growth for four consecutive months, it’s not just a miscalculation—it’s a failure to recognize fundamental structural changes in the industry.

The Triple-Threat Expansion That Nobody Saw Coming

The April data exposes an industry expanding through three simultaneous vectors, creating a multiplier effect that catches even experienced market watchers flat-footed.

Heifers Stay Home: The Return of National Herd Expansion

For years, conventional wisdom claimed that the national dairy herd would remain flat, or contract as consolidated operations focused on efficiency rather than cow numbers. That narrative just collided head-on with reality. According to USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service, the April milking herd reached 9.425 million head, up 89,000 compared to April 2024 and adding 5,000 just since March.

This isn’t a statistical anomaly. U.S. dairy farmers have added 102,000 cows to the national herd in just 10 months—a 1.1% increase that has brought the milking population to its highest level since mid-2021, with the exception of that single month in March 2023.

What makes this expansion truly remarkable is its timing. Producers are actively growing herds despite cull cow prices that would typically have them backing up the trailer to the freestall barn every time a cow shows the slightest sign of trouble. When dairy producers choose milk production over $1,500+ cull checks, it signals they’ve run the numbers and see substantially more long-term value in keeping those animals in the parlor than in the beef supply chain.

We should ask whether this herd growth is driven by confidence in dairy fundamentals or by producers chasing more substantial cash flow in regions where cowside margins remain artificially inflated by unsustainable subsidies or environmental regulatory forbearance? The geographic distribution of this growth suggests the latter may be more significant than industry cheerleaders care to admit.

From Good to Great: Yield Climbs Despite Dilutive Factors

As the national herd grows, individual cow productivity isn’t reduced by first-lactation heifers and held-over cull candidates. It’s improving. USDA reports milk per cow averaged 2,055 pounds in April, 11 pounds more than April 2024, representing a 0.6% increase.

This yield improvement is particularly telling because it’s happening simultaneously with herd expansion. The industry’s conventional wisdom holds that you can grow aggressively or improve per-cow production, not simultaneously. The USDA data directly contradicts this assumption.

Typically, rapid herd growth involves bringing in younger, first-lactation animals and retaining older cows longer, which drag down average productivity. Yet national yields are still climbing, suggesting that the genetic advancement curve is steepening rather than flattening, despite widespread complaints about genetic diversity constraints. The annual rate of genetic improvement appears to be outpacing the dilutive effects of herd expansion—a phenomenon that undermines decades of dairy management assumptions.

The Component Revolution Nobody’s Talking About

Perhaps the most significant trend in the April data—and the one getting the least industry attention—is the continued improvement in milk components. Analysis shows fat content reached 4.31% (up 1.7% from last year) while protein rose to 3.34% (up 1.2%).

This component boost is why the true expansion of U.S. milk production is double what the fluid numbers suggest. While raw volume increased 1.5%, component-adjusted production surged 3.0%. This means processors receive substantially more manufacturing material from each tanker, dramatically expanding the dairy solids available for cheese, butter, and powder production.

For farmers in Federal Orders with component pricing, this represents a significant revenue multiplier beyond simple volume growth. For processors, it means substantially improved manufacturing efficiency. Yet how many producer meetings have you attended where the focus was entirely on hundredweight volume rather than component yield? The industry’s fixation on fluid metrics is increasingly disconnected from the economic reality of modern milk production.

MYTH BUSTER: The Expansion/Efficiency Trade-Off Is Dead

Dairy advisors and economists have repeated the same mantra for decades: “Rapid herd expansion inevitably dilutes per-cow productivity.” The April data completely demolishes this long-held belief. Despite adding 89,000 cows nationally and expanding the dairy herd at the fastest rate in years, milk per cow still increased 0.6% year-over-year, according to the USDA’s official report.

This wasn’t supposed to happen. The traditional wisdom suggests that when operations add significant numbers of younger animals and retain marginal older cows longer, average production should decline or at best remain flat. But the evidence is clear—we’re simultaneously experiencing both quantity (more cows) AND quality (more milk per cow) expansion.

What changed? And why aren’t industry advisors acknowledging this new reality? The data suggests genetic advancement is accelerating faster than previously recognized. Modern genetic selection tools, genomic testing, and AI-driven breeding decisions deliver productivity gains that outpace the natural dilutive effects of herd turnover.

This has profound implications for dairy business planning. Suppose you’re still operating on the old assumption that you must choose between expansion and efficiency. In that case, you’re using an outdated playbook that places your operation at a significant competitive disadvantage against producers who recognize and leverage this new reality.

America’s Dairy Geography Revolution: The New Powerhouses Emerge

The national production increase masks the most important story in the April data: a fundamental geographic restructuring of America’s dairy industry happening faster than most industry veterans believed possible.

Texas: The Undeniably New Dairy Capital

If you’re still thinking of Wisconsin as America’s Dairyland, it’s time to update your mental map. According to USDA figures, Texas’s milk production surged an astonishing 10.6% year-over-year in April, reaching 1.511 billion pounds. This extraordinary expansion wasn’t just incremental growth but a seismic shift in production capacity.

Texas added 50,000 cows to its dairy herd in just 12 months, growing from 640,000 to 690,000 head. That single-state expansion accounts for 56% of the entire national herd growth, as verified by the USDA’s state-level data. Even more impressively, milk per cow jumped from 2,135 to 2,190 pounds, demonstrating that Texas isn’t just adding cows—it’s continuously improving productivity.

Let’s put this in perspective: Texas alone accounted for more than half of America’s net dairy herd expansion. The state is no longer merely an emerging dairy power; it has established itself as the epicenter of U.S. dairy growth with a production model that combines aggressive expansion with improving efficiency.

This rapid growth raises uncomfortable questions about resource allocation. When a single state adds more cows in one year than many traditional dairy states’ milks, how sustainable is the resulting concentration of animals, manure nutrients, and water demand? Texas’s growth model depends on groundwater from the rapidly depleting Ogallala Aquifer and cheap feed grain production subsidized by federal crop programs. Is this the sustainable future of American dairying, or are we witnessing a resource bubble that will eventually burst with devastating consequences?

Idaho: Growth Despite Disease Shadows

According to the USDA’s April report, Idaho posted a robust 4.2% milk production increase in April, reaching 1.471 billion pounds. Unlike Texas, however, Idaho’s growth came entirely from herd expansion. The state added 28,000 cows year-over-year while milk per cow remained flat at 2,110 pounds.

This reliance on herd growth rather than productivity improvement creates potential vulnerability, particularly as The Bullvine reports new cases of H5N1 avian influenza have begun to emerge in Idaho. While the impact was described as “limited” in April, this development warrants close attention. Have we learned nothing from California’s experience with H5N1? When an industry builds growth projections entirely on herd expansion without concurrent productivity improvements, it’s creating a house of cards that can collapse with the first strong biological headwind.

Idaho’s production model—focusing on cow numbers rather than cow efficiency—resembles a crop farmer expanding acreage without improving yield. When margins tighten or disease challenges emerge, operations without productivity improvements to buffer against herd reductions become disproportionately vulnerable. Is Idaho making the same strategic error that cost California its production dominance?

California: Beyond Bird Flu

California, America’s largest milk-producing state, continued to feel the effects of H5N1 with April production falling 1.4% year-over-year to 3.480 billion pounds, according to USDA data. However, analysts note this represents improvement from March’s 2.7% decline and outperformed their forecast of a 1.7% reduction.

Interestingly, California’s struggles stem primarily from reduced productivity rather than herd contraction. The state’s cow numbers increased slightly by 1,000 head year-over-year, but milk per cow fell by 30 pounds. This suggests H5N1’s primary impact has been on cow health and productivity rather than triggering widespread culling—an object lesson in the differential effect of disease on production parameters versus herd demographics.

The recovery trend in California and the stronger-than-expected performance elsewhere create a dichotomy of negative milk production in California and strong recovery in the rest of the country. This divergence has significant implications for regional milk pricing and product flows that FMMO reform advocates have yet to address adequately.

The Reshuffling of America’s Dairy Map

Beyond these major players, USDA’s state-level data revealed several other states posted dramatic production shifts that further illustrate the geographic redistribution of U.S. dairy capacity:

  • Kansas: +11.4% (emerging as another major growth center)
  • South Dakota: +9.2% (continuing its multi-year expansion trend)
  • Georgia: +7.2% (showing surprising strength in a traditionally shrinking region)
  • Washington: -4.5% (accelerating contraction in the Pacific Northwest)
  • Florida: -3.7% (continuing its long-term decline)
  • Wisconsin: +0.1% (essentially flat production from America’s traditional dairy heartland)

This pattern reveals a fundamental restructuring of U.S. dairy geography that’s happening regardless of whether industry leaders choose to acknowledge it. The traditional Upper Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions show minimal growth or outright contraction, while the Southern Plains and certain parts of the Southeast are experiencing explosive expansion.

Regional Production Shifts Reshaping the U.S. Dairy Landscape

StateApril 2025 Production (million lbs)YoY ChangeKey DriversFuture Implications
Texas1,511+10.6%+50,000 cows, +55 lbs/cowEmerging dominant production center requiring massive processing expansion
Idaho1,471+4.2%+28,000 cows, flat yieldGrowth is vulnerable to the emerging H5N1 situation
California3,480-1.4%+1,000 cows, -30 lbs/cowGradual recovery from H5N1 impact, primarily yield-driven
Wisconsin2,713+0.1%+7,000 cows, +15 lbs/cowThe traditional dairy heartland is showing minimal growth
Kansas382+11.4%+16,000 cows, +40 lbs/cowEmerging as a significant growth center in the Central Plains
South Dakota440+9.2%+16,000 cows, +30 lbs/cowSustained multi-year expansion continuing

This geographic shift has profound implications for processing capacity, transportation logistics, and regional price relationships that industry planners seem determined to ignore. The industry’s infrastructure was built around historical production centers, but milk is increasingly produced in regions lacking adequate processing capacity.

Who’s asking the tough questions about this mismatch? When milk production growth is concentrated in regions without proportional processing expansion, the result is inefficient transportation, pressure on class prices, and increased vulnerability to market disruptions. Is anyone planning for a dairy industry where Texas and Kansas collectively produce more milk than Wisconsin? Because that’s the trajectory we’re on, according to the multi-year trend in USDA production data.

H5N1: Managing Through Rather Than Solving

The emergence of H5N1 avian influenza in dairy herds created significant uncertainty for the industry over the past year. While still a concern, the April data suggests producers are developing effective management strategies to limit its impact on production, managing through rather than solving the underlying problem.

California, which was hit hardest by H5N1, is showing signs of recovery with the production decline rate moderating from -2.7% in March to -1.4% in April. This improvement, coupled with the slight increase in California’s cow numbers, indicates farmers are adapting to manage through the challenge rather than reducing herd size.

Analysts note that “most H5N1 cases in dairy cattle are being reported as subclinical, and many affected producers have not reported a decline in milk production on the farm.” But let’s be clear: ‘subclinical’ doesn’t mean ‘inconsequential.’ Subclinical infections can still compromise long-term health, reproduction, and lifetime productivity. The industry’s apparent satisfaction with “managing through” rather than solving the H5N1 challenge reflects a troubling pattern of addressing symptoms rather than root causes.

Are we witnessing another example of the dairy industry adapting to a new normal rather than solving a fundamental problem? Just as we’ve collectively accepted declining reproductive performance, shortened productive life, and escalating transition cow challenges as “normal,” the industry appears to be normalizing endemic H5N1 as just another management variable rather than a solvable problem.

Market Implications: Reality Check Coming

The April production report triggered immediate bearish reactions in dairy markets. Class III milk and cheese prices dropped approximately 20 cents soon after release. Market volatility was evident, as “at one point Class III was limit up (+75 cents) after the spot session” before settling lower.

What makes this production boom particularly significant is that it’s being driven by multiple simultaneous factors: expanding herd size, improving yields, and rising component levels. This multi-pronged expansion creates sustained upward pressure on supply that could continue through mid-2025, potentially crushing producer margins if demand doesn’t keep pace.

Analysts project that “component-adjusted growth could remain above 2% through June” if current trends persist. This suggests the supply pressure in the market could intensify in the coming months.

The embedded momentum in the system—102,000 additional cows added in just 10 months, according to USDA—creates production inertia that will continue even if expansion decisions slow. These newly added cows will continue contributing to the milk supply for multiple lactation cycles, maintaining elevated production levels even if farmers pause further expansion.

Is the industry headed for another self-inflicted oversupply crisis? When milk production substantially outpaces domestic consumption growth and exports fail to absorb the difference, the result is predictable: inventory buildups, price pressure, and eventual margin compression that forces painful contractions. Have we learned nothing from the cyclical boom-bust patterns of the past two decades?

Your Strategic Response: Five Critical Adjustments

How should dairy farmers respond to this rapidly changing production landscape? Here are key considerations for producers looking to maintain profitability in this environment:

1. Make Components Your Production North Star

With component-adjusted production growing at double the rate of fluid volume (3.0% vs 1.5%), the economic return on component improvement has never been clearer. Stop fixating on tank volume and start obsessing over component yield. Evaluate your feeding program, genetic selection, and management practices focusing on fat and protein optimization.

DHIA records can be invaluable for identifying your highest component producers for breeding decisions. Consider strategic culling based not just on volume but on component production efficiency. A 65-pound cow producing 4.5% butterfat and 3.6% protein might be more profitable than an 85-pound cow with 3.5% fat and 3.0% protein, especially in component-based payment systems.

When did you last sort your herd list by fat and protein pounds rather than milk volume? If you’re still selecting primarily for milk volume in your breeding program, you’re fighting yesterday’s economic battle while your competitors focus on today’s profit drivers.

2. Understand Your Regional Vulnerabilities

The dramatic regional disparities in the April data highlight how local conditions increasingly determine dairy success. Texas producers face very different challenges and opportunities from those in Wisconsin or California.

Have you honestly assessed whether your region is a long-term winner or loser in this geographic redistribution? If you’re in a contracting region, what competitive advantages can you leverage to overcome the structural headwinds? If you’re in an expansion area, are you prepared for the inevitable infrastructure constraints and environmental scrutiny that follow rapid growth?

Areas to critically evaluate include:

  • Local processing capacity trends and expansion plans
  • Regional feed cost and availability projections
  • Water access guarantees and regulatory trajectory
  • Labor market stability and cost escalation
  • Land base constraints and nutrient management limits

These factors are increasingly divergent across regions and will determine which areas can sustainably support continued growth. Many producers are making long-term capital investments based on outdated assumptions about regional competitiveness that the April USDA data directly contradicts.

3. Prepare for Price Pressure Now, Not Later

The sustained production expansion, particularly on a component-adjusted basis, creates the potential for inventory buildups and price pressure if demand doesn’t keep pace. Strategic risk management isn’t optional in this environment—it’s essential for survival.

Consider:

  • Forward contracting opportunities through your co-op or private buyers
  • Options strategies to protect downside risk
  • Building financial reserves while margins remain positive
  • Stress-testing your operation against potential Class III and component value scenarios

Are you budgeting based on the current milk price or the cost when your newest heifer group enters the milking string? The Federal Order system’s classified pricing means different producers will experience this market pressure differently. Understanding how your milk is utilized and priced becomes increasingly critical in this environment of growing supply.

4. Rethink Your Culling Strategy

The trend of slowed culling rates suggests that many producers retain older cows longer than usual due to favorable margins. While this maximizes short-term production, it could create vulnerability if margins tighten.

Are you keeping unprofitable cows in your herd because they’re still producing milk? Evaluate your culling decisions based on:

  • Individual cow profitability accounting for component production
  • Reproductive status and projected productive life
  • Current beef market opportunities (cull cow prices remain historically strong)
  • Replacement availability and costs

A clear culling strategy—rather than simply retaining all cows—will provide flexibility if market conditions change rapidly. This is the dairy equivalent of a crop farmer’s harvest strategy—knowing when to take profits rather than hoping for ever-higher yields.

5. Plan for H5N1 as Endemic, Not Temporary

While H5N1’s impact appears moderate, its continued presence creates ongoing risk. The experience in California shows how quickly production can be affected when disease challenges emerge.

Hoping H5N1 will simply disappear is not a strategy. Instead, develop comprehensive management protocols:

  • Robust biosecurity measures beyond basic visitor logs
  • Early detection systems and regular surveillance testing
  • Staff training on disease identification and management
  • Contingency plans for potential outbreaks, including segregation strategies

Have you calculated the economic impact of a 2% drop in herd productivity from subclinical H5N1 infection? For most operations, this “invisible” loss would significantly erode profitability. Yet, few have quantified this risk or developed specific mitigation strategies, despite the numerous cases documented by the USDA and reported in agricultural publications like The Bullvine.

The Bottom Line: Adapt or Be Left Behind

April’s milk production data from the USDA reveals an industry fundamentally transforming itself through geographic redistribution, component enhancement, and overall expansion. The 1.5% increase in raw volume—amplified to a 3.0% boost in component-adjusted terms—signals strengthening supply pressure that will challenge milk prices in the coming months.

The regional divergence in production performance—from Texas’s 10.6% surge to California’s ongoing struggles—highlights how local conditions increasingly determine dairy success. Producers must recognize that geography, processing capacity, and biological resilience now play outsized roles in determining competitive position.

The U.S. dairy landscape is evolving rapidly, with the dramatic growth in Texas and other Plains states shifting the center of gravity for American milk production. Traditional dairy regions like Wisconsin and the Pacific Northwest see their relative influence diminish as the Southern Plains emerges as the new growth engine.

For dairy farmers, now is the time to honestly reassess your strategic position in this changing environment:

  • Are you optimizing for components or still chasing volume?
  • Does your region have the infrastructure to support profitable dairy production in the long term?
  • Are you prepared for the price pressure inevitably following this supply expansion?
  • Have you developed a reproductive program to maintain herd size without retaining unprofitable cows?
  • Is your operation structured to withstand the biological challenges that appear increasingly endemic?

The winners in this new environment won’t necessarily be the largest producers, but rather those who best align their operations with the emerging realities of America’s restructured dairy map. The geographic revolution beneath the surface of these production numbers will reshape competitive dynamics for years to come.

Take a hard look at where your operation fits in this changing landscape. Are you positioned in a growth region with the right cows producing the right components for your market? Or are you holding onto outdated production models in regions facing structural decline?

The April production report isn’t just another data point—it’s a roadmap to the industry’s future. Those who read it correctly and adjust accordingly will thrive. Those who dismiss it as just another monthly fluctuation may wonder why their business model no longer works in an industry that’s moved on without them.

What specific change will you implement this month to align your operation with these emerging realities? Your answer to this question may determine whether you’re leading this transformation or being left behind by it.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : USDA Dairy Production Report
Tags : , , ,

Unveiling the Whey Revolution: December’s Surprising Surge in Dairy Markets

Friday, December 6th, 2024

Witness December’s dairy market surprise! Whey’s unexpected rise is driving Class III futures. Explore key insights today.

Summary:

The CME Dairy Market Reports of December 5th, 2024, reveal a dynamic shift in the dairy sector, with dry whey futures experiencing a significant rally while spot prices hold steady, directly influencing Class III futures amidst declining cheese values. Despite cheddar price dips, cheese exports to Mexico remain robust. The market exhibits divergent trends, with US dry whey supplies tightening, contrasting with EU markets and revealing a stark difference in butter import-export activities. As whey prices surge, prompting a reevaluation of market strategies, the intricate link between whey and Class III futures highlights potential profit margin enhancements despite input cost pressures. Concurrently, NFDM shows unexpected gains, and strategic planning becomes crucial to navigate potential volatility, which is complicated further by the bird flu outbreak‘s agricultural impact. The industry’s growth and stability pivot on addressing these evolving challenges, underscoring whey as a pivotal market force.

Key Takeaways:

  • Dry Whey futures experienced a significant rally, closing limit up in multiple contract months amidst unchanged spot prices.
  • Protein demand, driven by health trends, has led to decreasing sweet, dry whey stocks in the US, in contrast to a less robust EU market.
  • Class III futures have seen a bullish impact from Dry Whey trends despite mixed movements in cheese prices.
  • Spot butter prices remained steady, yet futures markets responded with declining enthusiasm.
  • NFDM futures diverged from global trends, maintaining a premium in the US, pointing towards potential short-term stability.
  • Export dynamics show that US cheese exports are robust, particularly to Mexico, while butter imports have risen sharply.
  • Dairy cow slaughter numbers increased significantly year-over-year, impacting supply dynamics.
dairy industry, whey revolution, whey prices, Class III futures, milk components, dairy producers, export markets, global dairy market, bird flu outbreak, agricultural sector

The sudden surge of whey, a usually overlooked component in the dairy industry, has unexpectedly taken center stage, causing market disruptions beyond anyone’s anticipation. This surge is not just a blip on the market charts; it signifies the beginning of a ‘whey revolution’ reshaping the dairy industry. Whey, often considered a byproduct, has become a key player, compelling dairy farmers and industry professionals to reassess their market strategies and production priorities. The stakes have never been higher for those in the dairy sector, as the soaring whey prices demand immediate attention and adaptation. As whey prices skyrocket, dairy farmers face a transformed landscape, presenting both opportunities for profit and challenges in balancing whey production with traditional dairy outputs. For industry professionals, the task lies in leveraging this shift to optimize operations and capture market share, as the implications of this ‘whey revolution’ reverberate through every level of the dairy supply chain, necessitating strategic transformations for competitive survival.

Whey: The Unexpected Diva of the Dairy Market

This week, dry whey futures have emerged as the undeniable star of the dairy market, stealing the spotlight from other commodities. Despite spot prices maintaining a steady balance, the futures have been propelled to impressive heights. The surge reflects a confluence of factors, predominantly the tightening of supplies and a robust demand landscape. Industry insiders suggest that these constraints mainly drive the market’s dynamics, indicating increased bullish sentiment among traders. 

While spot-dry whey has remained stagnant, not experiencing the fluctuations mirrored in futures, the divergence highlights an essential dichotomy in the market dynamics. Futures, often a window into market sentiment and expectations, reveal an underlying tension that spot prices have yet to absorb fully. The market’s heightened sensitivity to supply and demand alterations has thrust whey into the limelight, indicating a keen interest and prioritization of stocks among buyers who perhaps feared being left out of an upward trend. 

As dry whey takes the lead in the dairy market this week, it underscores a broader narrative within the dairy sector that highlights the pivotal role of proteins and their evolving market dynamics. As the ripple effects of this surge continue to unfold, industry stakeholders are left to ponder whether this buzz will solidify into long-term market shifts or merely represent a transient chapter. This uncertainty underscores the need for strategic planning and foresight in the face of potential long-term changes in the dairy market.

Whey’s Ripple Effect: Fueling Class III Futures

The surge in dry whey prices has significantly imprinted Class III futures, demonstrating the intricate link between these two market components. Every penny increase in dry whey contributes six cents to Class III futures. This mathematical relationship underscores whey’s substantial influence within the broader dairy pricing structure. Over recent weeks, the market has witnessed a notable uptick in whey prices due to tightened supplies, driving Class III futures up to $19.12 per hundredweight. 

This price hike unfolds a complex economic scenario for dairy producers. On one hand, the increased value of milk components, driven by rising whey prices, can enhance profit margins. However, the accompanying cost pressures on inputs and operational expenses pose challenges that must be carefully managed. Therefore, the convergence of higher whey prices and elevated Class III futures demands strategic planning from producers to navigate potential volatility. 

The ripple effects extend beyond immediate producer economics. As processors and manufacturers grapple with these shifts, there could be downstream impacts on product pricing, potentially affecting consumer markets. Additionally, competitive dynamics in export markets might adjust as US cheese exports leverage strong domestic pricing to assert a robust international presence.

Cheese: Navigating Market Swings and Export Expansions

The cheese market continues to capture attention, particularly in recent movements in spot cheddar prices and impressive export figures. Spot cheddar prices recently reversed, witnessing a decline, with blocks and barrels seeing price reductions of 3.5 and 2.5 cents per pound, respectively. This shift in spot prices indicates a market recalibration that may influence trading behaviors as participants respond to fluctuating price signals. 

Conversely, the export front presents a more buoyant narrative. US cheese exports surged, reaching 88.8 million pounds in October—a 12% increase from the previous year. This growth is predominantly driven by increased demand from key partners like Mexico, which imported 38 million pounds. This uptick highlights a strengthening export relationship and suggests a positive demand trajectory in international markets. 

The dip in spot prices is attributed to an accumulation phase in the domestic market, where buyers operate at current levels without aggressive purchasing activities. On the other hand, robust exports underscore an external demand buoyant enough to offset some domestic price pressures. Nonetheless, this dual narrative of dipping domestic spot prices and climbing export volumes creates a dynamic interplay likely to affect domestic producers, who strategically leverage international demand to stabilize revenues amidst fluctuating US prices. 

Such trends hold significant implications for the broader dairy industry. While lower domestic prices pressurize margins, vibrant export activities act as a buffer, ensuring consistent demand. This balance between domestic challenges and global opportunities remains critical for the industry’s resilience, particularly as stakeholders navigate ongoing market fluctuations and seek growth avenues beyond traditional markets.

Butter and NFDM: Divergent Paths Amid Market Volatility 

In recent days, the butter market has exhibited notable fluctuations. After an initial recovery, butter futures experienced a decline, influenced by the interplay between spot market stability and trading dynamics. Although spot butter prices held flat at $2.5400, the previous 5.5-cent increase earlier in the week hinted at underlying market firmness. Yet, the absence of vigorous buying interest curbed any substantial upward movement in futures. The rising open interest suggests mounting selling pressures to counteract remaining buy-side hedging activity. As a result, the butter market might stabilize around the mid-$2.50 mark, with potential for short-term holding patterns. 

Conversely, NFDM (Non-Fat Dry Milk) futures displayed a surprising upward trajectory, defying overarching global price signals that suggested weakness. This deviation was marked by a dip in open interest in nearby contracts, indicating a waning interest in the current pricing range. Although technically, a more significant downward correction could occur, the US market maintains a premium over its global counterparts. This stability may lead to a prolonged sideways trading range with limited drastic downsides. Additionally, ongoing concerns about bird flu in California introduce an element of uncertainty, which could influence market dynamics in the coming months. While a significant state-level recovery isn’t anticipated until early 2025, these uncertainties contribute to the complex outlook for NFDM.

Navigating the Dairy Divide: US Versus EU Market Dynamics

The global dairy market is complex. Contrasting conditions between the US and the EU significantly contribute to price dynamics, particularly in the dry whey sector. US dry whey prices have reached unprecedented highs, amplifying the price spread with European counterparts. This disparity in pricing underscores a more robust demand or constrained supply situation within the US market, driving prices upwards. 

However, industry stakeholders face multifaceted challenges that could impact this precarious balance. A pressing concern is the bird flu outbreak, particularly severe in regions like California, which has ripple effects across the broader agricultural sector. If animal health concerns escalate, this situation risks supply chains and export markets. 

Another challenge pertains to the sustainability of these current dry whey price levels. While tight supplies and strong protein demand have buoyed the market, questions remain about the longevity of these conditions. The reliance on diet trends and consumer preferences, such as the popularity of high-protein consumption tied to weight loss products, introduces a degree of volatility and unpredictability. 

The industry’s future growth and stability will depend on effectively addressing these challenges, balancing high demand with mitigating potential threats to supply continuity. Stakeholders are cautioned to consider these factors when navigating the ever-evolving dairy landscape. 

The Bottom Line

The dairy market is witnessing a fascinating phenomenon: dry whey is emerging as the unexpected leader, drastically influencing Class III futures. This surge embodies a broader trend of proteins significantly overtaking fats. As whey prices rally, they bolster futures and invite scrutiny into supply dynamics, raising questions about sustainability, especially when compared with the EU market. As we see class III futures experiencing momentum, the implications of such a shift could be extensive, potentially redefining investment strategies and operational decisions in the dairy sector. 

Meanwhile, cheese and butter exhibit divergent trends. Though the cheese market experiences price fluctuations, it benefits from robust export figures, particularly to Mexico. Butter and NFDM navigate their unique paths amidst market volatility, highlighting the complexity and interconnectedness of the global dairy trade. 

Ultimately, these developments prompt a reevaluation of market priorities and the influence of economic forces on traditional dairy commodities. As stakeholders ponder these shifts, they must consider whether this ‘whey revolution’ signals a fundamental change in market paradigms. How will the dairy industry adapt to these changing tides? Could they continue revolutionizing market dynamics, or will other forces emerge to shape the future? The answers to these questions will significantly impact strategic decision-making in this evolving market landscape.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , , , ,

Why Boosting Butterfat and Protein Is Key to Higher Profits

Saturday, August 31st, 2024

Boost your dairy profits by increasing butterfat and protein. Are you maximizing your milk’s revenue potential?

Summary: Have you ever wondered how the current trends in milk component levels could affect your bottom line? With butterfat levels climbing and milk protein prices dropping, it’s more important than ever for dairy farmers to keep an eye on these critical metrics. Recent data shows that actual butterfat levels are now at 4.2% and milk protein at 3.3%, significantly impacting producer revenue compared to industry averages. The high protein and butterfat content in Class III milk increases prices and revenues. To maximize earnings, consider the specific demands of your dairy herd and know how your herd compares to protein and butterfat levels. Strategies to boost butterfat and protein levels include feeding adjustments, genetic selection, and effective herd management. However, increasing a herd’s butterfat and protein levels can be challenging due to factors like feed costs, genetics, health issues, environmental factors, and regulatory constraints.

  • Recent trends show a rise in butterfat levels to 4.2% and a dip in milk protein prices, critically affecting dairy farmers’ revenue.
  • High protein and butterfat content in Class III milk significantly boosts prices and earnings for producers.
  • Ensuring your herd meets or exceeds these component levels involves strategies like feeding adjustments, genetic selection, and effective herd management.
  • Challenges to increasing butterfat and protein levels include feed costs, genetics, health issues, environmental factors, and regulatory constraints.
milk components, butterfat, protein, dairy farms, Class III milk, high protein, high butterfat, milk prices, revenue, butterfat prices, milk protein prices, dairy herd, earnings, farm profits, feed adjustments, genetic selection, herd management, high-fiber forages,

Have you ever wondered why specific dairy farms prosper and others struggle? The solution is frequently found in the milk’s components, notably butterfat and protein. According to the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), Class III milk with more excellent protein and butterfat content commands higher prices, significantly increasing revenues. Recent AMS studies state that “butterfat keeps producer milk prices reasonable.” Higher milk protein levels directly influence income and enhance the quality of dairy products, which fetch higher prices. According to industry statistics, Class III milk has 3.0% protein and 3.5% butterfat. In contrast, the averages for 2024 are 3.3% and 4.2%, respectively, with a current protein-butterfat pricing spread of $5.21 per cwt and an actual average spread of $6.87 per cwt. Understanding these components is critical for maintaining competitiveness and profitability in today’s industry.

Butterfat and Protein: The Hidden Lifelines of Your Dairy Business 

Whether you milk cows in a conventional or contemporary dairy state, it’s essential to understand that butterfat and protein are more than simply indicators of milk quality. They have the keys to your income.

Let us not mince words: more significant amounts of these components may imply the difference between breaking even and making a profit. The change in producer income depending on actual component amounts is an obvious sign. While milk protein prices have fallen, the consistent rise in butterfat prices has saved many farmers. Knowing your herd’s milk protein and butterfat levels and their relation to AMS index pricing might give valuable information. Consider it as unleashing an additional layer of potential in every gallon of milk you make.

So, the next time you evaluate your herd’s performance, pay close attention to these components. They are more than simply statistics; they are the foundation of your dairy company.

Focus Your Farm’s Future on Current Market Trends 

YearButterfat Price ($/lb)Milk Protein Price ($/lb)Butterfat Level (%)Milk Protein Level (%)Price Spread ($/cwt)
20212.403.503.73.14.92
20222.803.203.83.25.21
20233.202.804.03.26.21
20243.502.604.23.36.87

Current market patterns reveal a lot about where our priorities should be. According to the most recent Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) statistics, butterfat prices have risen over the last three years, but milk protein prices have fallen. This change makes butterfat an essential factor in sustaining fair milk pricing.

Is Your Herd Meeting Its Full Potential? Focus on Protein and Butterfat Levels 

Consider the specific demands of your dairy herd. Do you know how your herd’s milk compares to protein and butterfat? While AMS gives a broad index, your herd’s levels are critical to maximize earnings. The AMS index pricing is a benchmark that reflects the market value of milk based on its protein and butterfat levels. Understanding how your herd’s levels compare to this index can provide valuable insights into your farm’s profitability. Have you investigated how your herd compares this year, with average protein levels of 3.3% and butterfat at 4.2%? Even slight variations might have a significant effect on your bottom line. Knowing these facts may help you make more educated and intelligent business choices.

Boost Your Dairy Farm’s Profits by Focusing on Butterfat Levels 

Let’s look at the revenue impact: the difference between protein and butterfat pricing is significant. The current spread, which is the difference between the prices of protein and butterfat, is $5.21 per cwt., but recent data suggests it might rise to $6.87 per cwt. Concentrating on butterfat may significantly increase your income. Consider the impact that additional attention may have on your bottom line!

To paint a clearer picture, let’s break down the potential return on investment (ROI) if you concentrate on elevating your butterfat levels: 

Let’s consider the potential for increased profitability. If you can achieve the higher spread of $ 6.87 per cwt., the Revenue from Butterfat alone would be: 

Revenue from Butterfat = 100,000 pounds / 100 * $5.21Revenue from Butterfat = $5,210 per month 

Let’s consider if you can achieve the higher spread of $6.87 per cwt.: 

Revenue from Butterfat = 100,000 pounds / 100 * $6.87

Revenue from Butterfat = $6,870 per month 

This difference translates to: 

Additional Revenue = $6,870 – $5,210

Additional Revenue = $1,660 per month 

Over a year, this focus could net you an extra: 

Annual Additional Revenue = $1,660 * 12

Annual Additional Revenue = $19,920 

Understanding and adapting to these market trends can significantly impact your dairy farm’s profitability. Have you considered how your herd’s makeup stacks up? Your dairy farm’s future may depend on these tiny but essential modifications.

Ready to Boost Your Herd’s Butterfat and Protein Levels? Here’s How: 

Are you looking to increase your herd’s butterfat and protein levels? Here are some practical strategies: 

  • Feed Adjustments 
    What your cows consume directly influences the quality of their milk. Consider high-fiber forages such as alfalfa and grass hay to increase butterfat levels. Soybean or canola meals may be valuable sources of protein. Also, pay attention to the energy balance in the feed; inadequate energy might reduce butterfat and protein levels.
  • Genetic Selection 
    Did you know that genetics has an essential influence on milk components? Choose bulls with high estimated breeding values (EBVs) for butterfat and protein. EBVs measure an animal’s genetic potential for specific traits like milk quality. Breeding cows from high-component sires with high EBVs may gradually increase the milk quality of your herd.
  • Herd Management 
    Effective management strategies may make a significant impact. Ensure your cows are healthy and stress-free; these aspects may affect milk quality. Regular health checks, pleasant housing, and reducing the stress of milking processes are also necessary.
  • Monitor and Adjust
    Regular monitoring and adjusting are crucial to maintaining and improving your herd’s butterfat and protein levels. Minor modifications may result in substantial benefits, so remember the value of regular monitoring and adjusting. By fine-tuning these regions, you should observe an increase in butterfat and protein levels, raising your earnings. Every little bit matters, and making simple, consistent improvements may greatly enhance milk quality.

Hurdles to Higher Butterfat and Protein Levels: What You Need to Know

Let’s be honest: increasing your herd’s butterfat and protein levels can be challenging. What are the major problems here?

  • Feed Costs: Although high-quality feed may be costly, it is necessary to boost these levels. Choose a well-balanced diet high in crucial nutrients, and consider utilizing feed additives to increase butterfat and protein production.
  • Genetics: Not every cow is made equal. Individuals with higher genetic potential may produce more butterfat and protein. To address this, execute a systematic breeding program to pick high-component sires, progressively increasing your herd’s genetic potential.
  • Health Issues: Cows suffering from disease or stress do not produce optimally. To keep your herd in good health, schedule frequent veterinarian check-ups, keep the barn clean and pleasant, and watch for any symptoms of illness.
  • Environmental Factors: Weather and climate may alter feed quality and cow comfort, influencing milk composition. Take steps to reduce these impacts, such as providing shade and water in hot weather and ensuring enough shelter during winter.
  • Regulatory Constraints: Different areas’ legislation may restrict your capacity to extend or adjust your business. To handle these difficulties, stay current on local legislation and consult with agricultural extension organizations.

By tackling these issues squarely, you’ll be better positioned to increase those crucial butterfat and protein levels. Remember that every step you take toward development may result in a more prosperous and sustainable dairy enterprise.

The Bottom Line

Prioritizing greater butterfat and protein levels is critical for remaining competitive in today’s market. Understanding current trends and making intelligent modifications may make your dairy farm significantly successful. So, are you prepared to increase your farm’s profitability?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your go-to e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. We bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks like milking cows, mixing feed, and fixing machinery. With over 30,000 subscribers, Bullvine Daily keeps you informed so you can focus on your dairy operations.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Financial Managment
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Overlays

Send this to a friend