Archive for dairy margin protection

The $427,500 Diesel Hole McCarty Locks Shut Before January 1 

A 50¢ diesel move costs a 19,000-cow dairy roughly $427,500 a year. The McCartys book ~90% of next year’s gallons before Jan 1 — and treat beating the bottom as luck, not skill.

According to a May 8, 2026 report and an industry strategic-analysis brief, McCarty Family Farms aims to enter each fiscal year with roughly 90% of its diesel needs already booked for the next 12 to 18 months, working with Compeer Financial economist Dr. Megan Roberts on a layered procurement plan. Applied to a 45 gal/cow proxy at McCarty’s roughly 19,000-cow scale, a single 50-cent move on diesel would represent about $427,500 in annual exposure. That’s the kind of budget hole the McCarty hedging system is designed to prevent.

The system was built by four brothers — Mike, Clay, Dave, and Ken — who took a 15-cow Pennsylvania herd, moved it to western Kansas in 1999, and grew it into a roughly 19,000-cow operation across Kansas, Nebraska, and Ohio, with a workforce that has grown beyond the 130-plus head count cited in earlier coverage, and a long-term Danone milk contract. Right now, with U.S. retail on-highway diesel sitting at $5.64/gal as of May 12, 2026 per EIA’s weekly update — roughly a 61% jump from a year earlier — that discipline is the difference between funding the next generation and funding the pump.

📌 Editor’s Perspective: Where This Fits in the Bullvine Universe

This piece is the energy-risk leg of a margin story we’ve been mapping all month. Bullvine’s May 2026 Corridor Trap analysis pegged the annual drag at roughly $221,760 on a 600-cow Upper Midwest herd as basis slid from –$0.35 to –$0.85/cwt. The Corridor Trap is what happens to your milk check on the revenue side. The McCarty diesel rule is what locks down the cost side. Same farm. Same lender meeting. Different lever.

What’s Changing — and Why It Hits 24/7 Operations Hardest

Diesel isn’t a line item on a modern dairy. It’s the bloodstream. Feed delivery, manure hauling, milk hauling, cropping, generators, and third-party freight surcharges all move with the price of crude. Brownfield Ag News reported in early May 2026 that one dairy producer’s milk check was running close to .00/cwt while feed and fuel were eating the margin alive — part of a broader 2026 ag-economist warning from David Widmar’s April 28, 2026 Managing for Profitcolumn that energy-market volatility is now a primary 2026 cost-side risk.

For a 24/7 operation, a 50-cent move isn’t an inconvenience. It’s a quarterly-budget derailment. And it’s landing on top of the FMMO Make-Allowance 2025 update — effective June 1, 2025, per the USDA AMS final rule — which trimmed an estimated $0.85–$0.93/cwt off Class III–IV values, with Class III near $0.92/cwt. Stack those two numbers and you can see why lenders are starting to ask for a written energy-risk plan before they renew a line of credit.

The farms feeling it first are the ones running the most equipment hours per cow — large freestall operations with custom hauling contracts, long milk routes to a tightening number of plants, and irrigation. If that’s you, the math below isn’t theoretical.

How This Plays Out on Real Farms — The Energy Risk Management Math

Here’s the back-of-the-envelope every dairy CFO should run today. Using an industry proxy of roughly 45 gallons of diesel per cow per year — covering feeding, manure, and basic forage transport — a 500-cow herd burns about 22,500 gallons annually. A 50-cent spike costs that herd $11,250. A dollar move costs $22,500. At 5,000 cows, the same 50-cent move costs $112,500. At McCarty’s roughly 19,000-cow scale, illustrative math points to about $427,500 in exposure on that one move.

Herd SizeAnnual Diesel (gal)25¢ move50¢ move$1.00 move
500 cows22,500$5,625$11,250$22,500
1,000 cows45,000$11,250$22,500$45,000
5,000 cows225,000$56,250$112,500$225,000
McCarty (~19k)855,000$213,750$427,500$855,000
40,000 cows1,800,000$450,000$900,000$1,800,000

Source: 45 gal/cow/year industry proxy. Your actual intensity moves with cropping system, hauling distance, manure logistics, and how much fuel sits on a custom operator’s invoice rather than yours. Farms growing most of their own forage will run hotter than this proxy.

🎯 The Magic Number: $0.09/cwt

That’s the cost of a 50-cent diesel move on a 200-cow herd shipping 24,000 lbs/cow (9,000 gallons × $0.50 = $4,500; ÷ 48,000 cwt of milk ≈ $0.09/cwt). On its own, a rounding error. Stacked on the FMMO Make-Allowance 2025 drag of roughly $0.92/cwt and a basis slide, it can be the number that breaks the bank — and on a marginal book, the variable that tips a Debt Service Coverage Ratio below 1.25x.

The Mechanics: Three Pillars of the McCarty System

The McCarty system rests on three pillars: proactive layering, historical benchmarking, and mitigation over speculation. They don’t try to call the bottom — the McCartys are described as treating that as luck, not skill. As forward months become available, the team books physical gallons in increments — 20–25% at a time — smoothing what the Compeer team has publicly framed as the “fat tails” of the energy market.

Success isn’t beating the spot price. It’s landing in the bottom third or bottom half of the 5- to 10-year historical average — or simply staying consistent year over year — so milk margins can be calculated with precision before the cows ever produce them. Compeer’s Chief Risk Officer Bill Moore calls it “controlling the controllables.” Translation: lock down breakeven, watch the consensus, and stress-test what happens if ad-hoc government payments fall or Class III drops below $15/cwt.

The 18-month plan is a family-business mechanism for the McCarty brothers — Mike, Clay, Dave, and Ken — built on the same data discipline behind their genetics program, their 2012 Rexford milk condensing plant, and the long-term Danone partnership that anchors their revenue side. None of this is about the next quarter. It’s a question every multi-generational operation faces: whether the next generation inherits a balance sheet they can run, or one they have to dig out from under.

The Hidden Exposures a Hedge Doesn’t Cover

Worth saying out loud: a 90% fuel hedge is not a shield. Three exposures still run through the system the contracts can’t reach.

  • Hauling adjusters. Milk haulers and commodity deliverers run fuel surcharges that re-price weekly off the EIA index. Your tank is locked. Their truck isn’t.
  • The processing paradox. As regional plant capacity tightens, dairies get pushed to longer milk routes to find an accepting plant. Longer routes mean more surcharge surface area.
  • Embedded energy. Mineral premixes, plastic resin, distillers grains, equipment parts — all carry crude-oil cost inside the invoice. Lock the diesel; the inflation still leaks in.

That’s why the 90% target matters. Shrinking the surface area of the things you can’t control is the entire point.

How Much Does Skipping the Hedge Actually Cost You?

Run your own number. If you milk 500 cows and diesel moves $1.00 — and weekly EIA retail diesel did exactly that, climbing roughly $2.14/gal year-over-year through May 2026 — that’s $22,500 you didn’t budget for. On 1,000 cows, $45,000. That’s well above the USDA NASS national livestock-worker average of $17.51/hr for the October 2024 reference week, per the November 20, 2024 Farm Labor release — i.e., real wage money, regardless of region. It’s also more than seven times the bid on a single replacement heifer at the USDA AMS national average of $3,010/head, with USDA NASS’s January 30, 2026 Cattle Inventory printing 3.90 million dairy replacement heifers — the lowest since 1978, per Farm Progress’s February 16, 2026 reporting on the same release.

Every dollar you don’t lose to a fuel spike is a dollar that stays in the business — for cows, for people, for technology, for principal paydown.

Is Your Lender Already Asking About This? — The Energy Risk Management Conversation

In Bullvine’s May 2026 Corridor Trap analysis, a corridor-aware stress test pegs the annual drag at roughly $221,760 on a 600-cow Upper Midwest herd as basis slid from –$0.35 to –$0.85/cwt — and lenders increasingly want to see that same kind of stress test applied to your fuel budget. A documented energy-risk plan — even a one-pager showing how you forward-book diesel — improves your risk profile. In a corridor-aware stress test, an unhedged fuel budget can be the variable that tips a marginal Debt Service Coverage Ratio from acceptable to constrained.

If your bank hasn’t asked yet, your next renewal conversation is the right moment to bring the document yourself.

Options and Trade-Offs for Farmers — Including Dairy Margin Coverage Stacking

You don’t need a 19,000-cow footprint or a quant analyst on retainer to copy the discipline. You do need to pick a lane.

StrategyPrimary BenefitThe Price You PayBest-Fit DairyWatch This Metric
Lock fixed diesel priceBudget certainty before the fiscal year startsLose upside if spot diesel fallsAny dairy with predictable annual fuel useCoverage above 90% can leave no room for usage surprises
Layer 20% to 25% incrementsSmooths volatility across the buying cycleMore supplier calls and internal tracking500 to 5,000 cow dairies building disciplineGallons booked vs. actual 12-month use
Prepay forward gallonsGives lender visible cost controlTies up working capitalLarger dairies with strong liquidityCash tied up before milk revenue arrives
Pair fuel with DRP or LGM-DairyStabilizes more of the milk, feed, and fuel marginPremium cost plus more paperworkMargin-managed dairies with lender scrutinyNet margin after premium, not gross protection
Keep spot-market exposureMaximum upside if diesel fallsNo protection when the market jumpsOnly farms with low fuel intensity or strong cash reserves50¢ move exposure before Jan. 1
  • Co-op forward booking — the 500-cow blueprint. Work with your local fuel co-op to forward-contract gallons 12 months out. Lock 25% in September for Q1 delivery. Another 25% in December for Q2. And so on. By the time the calendar flips, you’ve layered four price points instead of betting on one. When it works: you’ve got working capital and a lender comfortable with prepaid inventory. Risk: if spot prices fall below your locked rate, you’ll pay more than the neighbor who didn’t hedge. You’re buying budget certainty, not the bottom of the market.
  • The “Jan 1, 90%” rule. Set a hard target to have 90% of next year’s diesel booked before the fiscal year starts. When it works: any size farm running an annual budget. Requires: 12 months of clean fuel-use data. Limit: leaves 10% open for genuine consumption surprises — herd expansion, new acreage, beef-on-dairy intensity.
  • 30-day on-ramp. This month, pull last year’s fuel invoices, calculate your gallons-per-cow, and call your fuel supplier to ask what forward-contract terms they offer. That’s the entire starting move. No working capital required to make the phone call.
  • Integrate fuel with milk and feed risk. Fuel hedging is one piece of a margin toolkit. Compeer’s published framework treats it alongside DRP for component-based revenue protection, LGM-Dairy for bundled feed risk, and Dairy Margin Coverage as a Tier 1 backstop that’s often too small for large herds. None of these tools work alone. Pair them.

The trade-off table — benefit vs. cost, plain English:

StrategyPrimary BenefitThe “Price” You Pay
Locking priceBudget certaintyLoss of “downside” opportunity if spot falls
Layering 25% incrementsCost averaging across the cycleIncreased admin and supplier time
Prepaying forward gallonsLender confidence in your risk planWorking capital tied up
Pairing with DRP / LGM-DairyMargin certainty across feed + milkPremium cost on the policy

Key Takeaways

  • If you can’t say what you paid per gallon over the last 12 months, you don’t have a fuel strategy — you have a fuel bill.
  • If your fuel exposure on a 50-cent move would change a hire, an expansion, or a debt payment, you have a hedging case. Run the test: gallons/cow × $0.50 × your herd size.
  • If you can hit 50% coverage by January 1, you’re ahead of the spot-market crowd. 90% is the McCarty benchmark, not the entry point.
  • If you book a layer, book another. One fixed price isn’t a strategy — three or four staggered layers is.
  • If you hedge fuel without hedging milk or feed, you’ve stabilized one leg of a three-legged stool. Pair it with DRP, LGM-Dairy, or a forward milk contract.
  • If your milk hauling, mineral premix, or replacement heifer bills are climbing faster than diesel, the embedded energy is leaking in. Track those line items separately.
  • If your next lender meeting is inside 90 days, bring a one-page energy-risk plan before they ask for it.

The Real Question

The next 50-cent diesel move is coming. The only question is whether your operation has decided in advance who it’s going to hurt — the market, or you. Where does your fuel coverage sit on January 1, and what would you have to change this month to get it closer to 90? The McCarty brothers built a 12–18 month answer to that question. Many multi-generational dairy families face the same calculus when planning for succession — and yours can do the same work at a smaller scale.

Try It Yourself · Free Tool

Reporting in this article is based on published trade-press coverage (Dairy Herd Management, Brownfield Ag News, Farm Progress, Bullvine archive), public Compeer Financial materials, USDA AMS and NASS data (USDA NASS Farm Labor 11/20/2024; USDA NASS Cattle 01/30/2026), EIA weekly retail diesel data, and an industry strategic-analysis brief. The Bullvine did not independently interview McCarty Family Farms or Compeer Financial for this piece. Diesel-cost figures are illustrative calculations using a 45 gal/cow industry proxy and will vary by farm.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More

The Sunday Read Dairy Professionals Don’t Skip.

Every week, thousands of producers, breeders, and industry insiders open Bullvine Weekly for genetics insights, market shifts, and profit strategies they won’t find anywhere else. One email. Five minutes. Smarter decisions all week.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

So… Former Fonterra Execs Are Making Lentil Cream That Actually Whips. What’s That Tell Us?

Former Fonterra execs just cracked 140% overrun with lentils—that’s dairy-grade performance threatening your premium cream margins.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s what caught my attention over morning coffee—and it should catch yours too. Former Fonterra executives are now commercializing a lentil-based whipping cream that consistently hits 140% overrun, matching the performance of UHT dairy cream in professional kitchens. We’re talking about Alex Devereux (former Fonterra) as CEO and Leon Clement (ex-Synlait CEO, former Fonterra MD) leading this charge through their company ANDFOODS. The technology comes from five years of serious R&D at New Zealand’s Riddet Institute, not some garage startup fantasy. What’s really interesting? This cream holds stable for four hours in commercial bain-maries and handles high heat, acid, and alcohol—that’s premium foodservice performance that directly threatens your highest-margin cream sales. The global plant-based heavy cream market is projected to hit $5.08 billion by 2033, growing at 11.2% annually while we’re dealing with volatile feed costs and labor shortages. If dairy industry veterans are confident enough to bet their careers on this technology, maybe it’s time we start paying serious attention to what’s happening in our own backyard.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Premium Margin Alert: Plant-based heavy cream segment growing at 11.2% annually toward $5.08 billion by 2033—start monitoring your cream pricing more closely and consider diversifying into specialty applications where performance matters more than price.
  • Foodservice Vulnerability: Professional kitchens are switching to allergen-free alternatives that simplify operations (one cream handles multiple dietary restrictions vs. stocking three different products)—evaluate your own allergen-free dairy development to beat them at their own game.
  • Technology Platform Risk: The real threat isn’t this specific cream but the fermentation platform that could unlock other plant sources—consider R&D partnerships with universities to develop your own enhanced-performance dairy ingredients before competitors do.
  • Supply Chain Lesson: Product’s profitability depends more on volatile coconut oil prices (up 100% year-over-year to $2,766/ton) than lentil costs—shows how global commodity markets can impact local dairy competition in unexpected ways, worth factoring into your own risk management.
plant-based dairy alternatives, dairy margin protection, cream market competition, dairy industry innovation, foodservice dairy solutions

You know what got me thinking at the last dairy conference? I was chatting with this processor from Wisconsin—good guy, been in the business longer than I have—and he said something that stuck with me: “Andrew, when the guys who built our industry start betting against us… that’s when I start losing sleep.”

He was talking about Alex Devereux. Former Fonterra executive, now running something called ANDFOODS, making whipping cream from lentils. And before you roll your eyes (trust me, I get it), this isn’t another oat milk fairy tale. This is serious business that’s got implications for every cream check you’re writing.

What’s Actually Going Down in New Zealand

Look, I’ve been tracking plant-based alternatives for years now, and most of it has been… well, let’s just say I wouldn’t serve it to my neighbors. But when seasoned dairy veterans start commercializing university research that’s been five years in the making? That’s when you pay attention.

The thing about this Flora Plant Cream—and I’ve been following the research coming out of Massey University’s Riddet Institute since the early reports—is that it’s not your typical startup story. We’re talking about serious R&D led by Dr. Arup Nag’s team, with patents filed and everything. These aren’t garage entrepreneurs trying to disrupt dairy for the sake of it.

What caught my attention was the leadership composition. You’ve got Alex Devereux as CEO, straight from Fonterra operations. Chairman Leon Clement? Former Synlait CEO and ex-Fonterra Managing Director. This isn’t Silicon Valley venture capital chasing the next food trend—it’s dairy industry veterans who understand exactly what they’re competing against.

And here’s what makes this different: while most plant-based products fail miserably when you try to whip them (and who hasn’t had that frustrating experience in the test kitchen?), this lentil cream consistently hits 140% overrun. That’s matching UHT dairy cream performance. It handles high heat, acidic environments, even alcohol mixing. Most importantly for our foodservice customers, it holds stable for up to four hours in a bain-marie.

I’ve seen this firsthand at a few test kitchens now. Professional chefs are actually using it.

The Market Reality That Should Concern You

Let me be straight about where this industry is heading. Current plant-based dairy projections show growth to $97.14 billion by 2034—that’s 9.4% compound annual growth while we’re dealing with volatile feed costs and labor shortages.

But here’s what really keeps me up at night: the dairy-free heavy cream segment alone is projected to hit $5.08 billion by 2033. According to industry analysis, that’s 11.2% annual growth, and we’re talking about some of our highest-margin products here.

I was visiting a 1,200-cow operation in Vermont last month—family’s been dairying for three generations—and the owner made a point that really resonated: “We can handle losing volume on commodity milk, Andrew. But when they start taking our premium cream business… that’s where it hurts.”

The pricing gap is still there, though. Recent USDA analysis shows plant-based alternatives running nearly double the price of conventional dairy. But here’s the thing—with current corn prices at $4.20 a bushel and soybean meal hitting $350 per ton, our own input costs are squeezing margins from both sides.

What’s interesting is how this fits into the broader trends I’m seeing. In Wisconsin, where I spend a lot of time, processors are telling me their biggest concern isn’t commodity competition—it’s losing those high-value specialty applications where performance matters more than price.

The Science Behind This Breakthrough

The technology story here is actually fascinating, and it solves a problem that’s been plaguing plant-based alternatives for years. According to Journal of Dairy Science research, the biggest barrier to plant-based adoption isn’t ideology—it’s functionality.

What ANDFOODS figured out is how to take what they call a “mystery lentil variety”—high in protein, around 25%, but completely unpalatable in its natural state—and transform it through a proprietary fermentation process. The result? A neutral-tasting, highly functional base that eliminates those “beany” off-flavors that kill most legume-based products.

The formulation strategy is actually pretty clever from a cost perspective. They’re using just 1% lentil protein as the functional core, then blending it with coconut and canola oils to achieve that 31% fat content we need for proper mouthfeel and whipping performance. It’s like they’re leveraging the unique properties of that fermented protein without needing massive quantities of the expensive stuff.

And the allergen profile… this is where it gets interesting for foodservice. Free from dairy, soy, and gluten, plus no palm oil. For a restaurant dealing with multiple dietary restrictions, this could be a game-changer. One cream that handles everything instead of stocking three different alternatives.

I talked to a chef from a high-end restaurant group in Chicago last week, and he said something that stuck: “Give me one allergen-free cream that performs like dairy, and I’ll simplify my entire dessert operation.” That’s the kind of sticky, high-volume customer that commands premium pricing.

The Economic Reality Check

Here’s where my years of watching input costs comes in handy, and it’s not all sunshine for this innovation. The cost structure is… well, it’s complicated in ways that might surprise you.

While dairy cream benefits from a century of optimization and—let’s be honest—significant government subsidies, this lentil cream faces multiple input price exposures. The biggest vulnerability? Coconut oil prices, which hit $2,766 per metric ton by July 2025—that’s nearly 100% year-over-year increase.

So this “lentil” cream’s profitability is actually more tied to Southeast Asian climate patterns than to legume markets. That’s a supply chain risk I wouldn’t want to manage during typhoon season.

What strikes me about this is how it exposes the product to climate and geopolitical risks in regions most dairy producers never think about. We’re used to managing weather risks in our own backyards, but this technology is vulnerable to disruptions halfway around the world.

Agricultural economists are noting that scaling specialized crop varieties requires massive supply chain investment. Building dedicated contract farming programs for this mystery lentil variety? That’s capital-intensive work that could limit rapid expansion.

The Regulatory Roadblock Nobody Talks About

What’s really going to slow this down—and most people don’t realize this—is the regulatory pathway. The proprietary fermentation process triggers “novel food” requirements across major international markets.

We’re talking 9-12 months through Food Standards Australia New Zealand just to get started, and that’s after you’ve compiled all the scientific documentation. For a startup with $2.7 million in seed funding, managing multiple jurisdiction-specific scientific dossiers is a massive resource drain.

The regulatory timeline, not market demand, is going to dictate how fast this thing scales globally. And having been through regulatory processes myself (though nothing this complex), I can tell you that 9-12 months is optimistic if everything goes perfectly.

The Professional Kitchen Advantage

Here’s something that’s flying under the radar but shouldn’t be: the foodservice angle. Food industry analysts are noting that professional kitchens demand consistent performance under stress conditions. This lentil cream’s four-hour stability in commercial equipment is no joke.

I’ve been in enough commercial kitchens to know that consistency trumps everything else. Chefs don’t care about your sustainability story if your product breaks during the dinner rush. The fact that this cream can withstand the abuse of a professional kitchen—high heat, acidic ingredients, extended hold times—that’s what separates it from most alternatives.

The partnership with Upfield for global distribution solves the go-to-market challenge that kills most food-tech startups. They’re not just competing on product—they’re leveraging established manufacturing networks and the Flora brand equity.

What’s particularly smart is their dual-channel strategy. They’re targeting both retail consumers and professional foodservice, which allows them to build volume through high-value applications while maintaining retail presence.

Supply Chain Concentration Risks

The supply chain story is where this gets really interesting from a risk perspective. Global lentil production is dominated by Canada (34%), India (19%), and Australia (15%), and India’s role as both major producer and net importer creates market complexity.

We’ve seen what happens when specialized ingredients face supply disruptions. Remember the quinoa price spikes a few years back? The “mystery lentil variety” is both a strength and a vulnerability. It provides IP protection, but scaling a niche crop variety from the ground up? That’s not just expensive—it’s risky.

One bad growing season in Saskatchewan, and you’re looking at significant cost pressures. That’s the kind of supply chain vulnerability that keeps procurement managers awake at night.

What This Means for Your Operation

From what I’m seeing across the industry, here’s what you need to be thinking about:

Keep an eye on your premium margins. If you’re seeing foodservice accounts asking about allergen-free options, that’s an early warning signal. The 500-cow operation in Iowa that started partnering with local restaurants for specialty dessert cream? They saw this coming and adapted.

Consider your own allergen-free development. The regulatory pathway for traditional dairy modifications is much simpler than novel food approvals. Beat them at their own game with lactose-free, enhanced-protein dairy creams that solve the same problems.

Think about value-added applications. The premium restaurant market, specialty food service, and regional artisan channels offer better margins and more defensible positions. The Vermont dairy I mentioned earlier? They’re now supplying three farm-to-table restaurants in Burlington with custom cream blends.

Don’t ignore the supply chain lessons. Whether it’s coconut oil volatility or lentil crop risks, this innovation shows how global commodity markets can impact local dairy competition in unexpected ways.

The Strategic Implications

Fonterra’s May 2024 decision to divest consumer brands and refocus on B2B ingredients is starting to look pretty smart. They’re retreating from the direct consumer battlefield and fortifying where they have real advantages—industrial-scale processing and long-term B2B relationships.

The way I see it, this isn’t about one lentil cream threatening our entire industry. It’s about the sophistication of competition increasing. The producers who adapt their value propositions to compete on performance, not just tradition, are the ones who’ll come out ahead.

The real lesson here? The most serious challengers aren’t coming from Silicon Valley startups—they’re coming from regions with deep agricultural expertise and institutional research capabilities. The fact that this is emerging from New Zealand, right in our industry’s backyard, tells us something about the competitive landscape ahead.

My take? This innovation represents a warning shot rather than an existential threat. It’s proof that the marketplace is becoming more sophisticated, and professional buyers are demanding products that deliver on functional promises. Those of us who’ve been in this industry long enough know that the smart money adapts to new rules rather than pretending they don’t exist.

Because whether we like it or not, the rules of competition are changing. And that’s the lesson from the lentil disruption—not that plant-based alternatives will replace dairy overnight, but that we better be ready to compete on performance, not just heritage.

Learn More:

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

The Sunday Read Dairy Professionals Don’t Skip.

Every week, thousands of producers, breeders, and industry insiders open Bullvine Weekly for genetics insights, market shifts, and profit strategies they won’t find anywhere else. One email. Five minutes. Smarter decisions all week.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Send this to a friend