Image
FacebookEmailTwitterRSS

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Overlays

Archive for robotic milking ROI

The Robot Truth: 86% Satisfaction, 28% Profitability – Who’s Really Winning?

Thursday, November 20th, 2025

When satisfaction rates soar but profitability plummets, the dairy industry’s automation revolution reveals uncomfortable truths about who really wins

The Robot Paradox reveals dairy farming’s uncomfortable truth: while 86% of farmers recommend robots to others, only 28% achieve the production gains needed for clear profitability. This 58-point gap exposes how quality-of-life improvements mask economic challenges

You know, that 4 a.m. alarm clock is becoming a thing of the past on more and more dairy farms. I’ve been tracking this transformation pretty closely, and what’s fascinating is where we’re at in 2025—the robotic milking market has grown to about $3.39 billion globally according to Future Market Insights, with projections suggesting we’ll hit $19.5 billion by 2035.

Big numbers, right? But here’s what’s interesting…

When you dig beneath all those impressive adoption statistics, there’s a more complicated story that I think every farmer considering robots really needs to hear. The University of Calgary followed 217 Canadian dairy producers through their robotic transitions—published the whole thing in the Journal of Dairy Science back in 2018—and what they found, combined with research from around the world, reveals some surprising patterns.

So yes, 86% of farmers who’ve installed robots would recommend them to others. That’s genuine satisfaction. But here’s the interesting part: only about 28% are actually achieving the production increases needed for clear profitability, based on the University of Minnesota’s economic modeling this year.

That gap? Well, it tells you something important about what’s really happening out there.

Why Farmers Love Robots Even When the Numbers Don’t Always Work

You probably know someone who’s installed robots and can’t stop talking about how it’s changed their life. A fifth-generation Prince Edward Island farmer told me recently, “I haven’t missed one of my kids’ events since we installed the robots.” And honestly, I hear this all the time.

This quality-of-life transformation—it’s real, and it explains why satisfaction rates stay high even when the economics get challenging.

Looking more closely at that Calgary data, some interesting patterns emerge. About 58% of farms report increased milk production, which sounds good. But these range from tiny 2-pound gains all the way up to exceptional 10-pound improvements. Meanwhile, 34% maintain exactly the same production levels despite dropping serious money on robots. And here’s what really stands out—18% actually see production go down. Makes profitability pretty much impossible when that happens.

Production Reality exposes the hidden complexity: while 58% of farms see production increases, most gain only 2-3 lbs/day when 5+ lbs is required for profitability. Meanwhile, 34% see no change and 18% actually lose production—making robots profitable for just 28% of adopters

As Trevor DeVries from University of Guelph recently explained, “What producers are discovering is that robotic milking success depends on having the right combination of factors. The technology changes the nature and flexibility of labor rather than simply reducing hours.”

The Scale Trap defies conventional wisdom: small farms see 355% profit increases while medium-sized operations (61-120 cows) lose money with robots. This “missing middle” represents 40-50% of North American dairies—too large for simplicity benefits, too small for economies of scale

When More Milk Doesn’t Mean More Money

A Kansas dairy farmer shared something with me that really stuck: “We tried to save money by retrofitting our existing barn—big mistake. Cow traffic issues cost us at least 10 pounds of milk per cow until we finally redesigned the entire layout a year later. Do it right the first time.”

His experience aligns with research from multiple countries. Yes, 58% of farms report some production increases according to that Calgary study. But this year, the Minnesota Extension discovered that you need gains of at least 5 pounds per day to overcome the technology’s cost structure.

Most farms are getting just 2-3 pound increases? They’re stuck in what researchers call the “marginal profitability zone”—where success depends on milk prices staying strong and everything else going perfectly.

The Numbers That Matter

The Minnesota team uncovered specific thresholds that determine success, and honestly, these are sobering:

If your production increases just 2 pounds per day, robots need to last longer than 10 years to be more profitable than your old parlor. If production stays flat—and remember, that’s a third of farms—you’re looking at robots needing 13 to 17 years just to break even. And if production actually decreases? Well, robots are never going to be as profitable as what you had before.

Now, the financial reality gets even tougher when farmers discover that operational costs are running 300 to 400% higher than dealers projected. Teagasc in Ireland documented electricity costs that were nearly three times higher than those of conventional systems back in 2011. New Zealand farmers have told researchers their electricity bills doubled after installation. One farmer showed me maintenance invoices that hit six figures in the first year—the dealer told him to expect five to nine thousand.

The Scale Problem Nobody Expected

Turkish researchers published something in 2020 that really challenges what we’ve assumed about farm modernization. They looked at robot economics across different herd sizes, and what they found… well, it surprised me.

The Scale Trap defies conventional wisdom: small farms see 355% profit increases while medium-sized operations (61-120 cows) lose money with robots. This “missing middle” represents 40-50% of North American dairies—too large for simplicity benefits, too small for economies of scale

Small operations with 10 to 60 cows saw profit increases of 355% with robots. Operations with 121 or more cows? Generally profitable with proper execution. But here’s the kicker—farms with 61 to 120 cows actually saw decreased profitability.

Now, this Turkish study reveals a pattern that, if it holds true for North America, has profound implications. That middle group represents about 40-50% of North American dairy farms. We’re potentially talking about what economists call the “missing middle”—too large for the simplicity benefits of small-scale operations, but too small for the economies of scale that make it work for bigger dairies.

Looking at different regions, the pattern seems to align. Wisconsin farms averaging 90 cows? They’re right in what could be this danger zone. Vermont’s typical 125-cow operations sit just above the profitability threshold. California’s larger operations generally do fine. But those traditional Midwest family farms in that 80 to 100 cow range… if this Turkish research applies here, they really need to think this through carefully.

Down in the Southwest, where operations tend to be larger, the economics often work better. But what about Southeast producers with their typically smaller herds and higher humidity challenges? That’s a whole different calculation. And up in Canada—where that Calgary study originated—producers in Ontario versus those in Alberta face completely different economics, based on quota systems and herd-size restrictions.

The Genetic Timeline That Changes Everything

Here’s something that doesn’t get nearly enough attention—it takes 5 to 8 years to breed a herd that’s actually optimized for robotic milking. I’m not kidding.

Research published in the Journal of Dairy Science last year analyzed over 5 million milking records from about 4,500 Holstein cows. What they found is that udder conformation traits crucial for robot efficiency are moderately to highly heritable—we’re talking 0.40 to 0.79. So yes, you can breed for robot success. But man, it takes time.

A Wisconsin farmer discovered this the hard way two years after installing his robots. “I sold three of my highest producers six months after installation,” he told me. “They were production champions but robot time hogs. After replacing them with more efficient cows, my output actually increased even though individual cow averages decreased slightly.”

Think about that—higher total output with lower individual averages. It’s all about efficiency.

CRV and other breeding organizations showed in 2023 that farmers using bulls specifically selected for robot-friendly traits ultimately get about 350,000 pounds more milk per robot annually. For a three-robot operation, that’s over $200,000 in additional revenue. But—and this is crucial—only after 5 to 8 years of strategic breeding.

The Efficiency Gap That Makes or Breaks You

What really blew my mind: individual cow efficiency in robotic systems varies by nearly 300%. Same production levels, wildly different robot utilization.

Lactanet did this fascinating comparison in 2023—two cows with almost identical daily production, 48 kilos versus 49.5 kilos. But one produced her milk nearly three times more efficiently in terms of robot time. Just think about the implications…

And here’s where genetics meets economics in ways we’re just beginning to understand…

This explains why manufacturer recommendations about running 60 to 70 cows per robot produce such different results from farm to farm. High-efficiency operations can profitably run 68 cows per robot, sometimes more. Low-efficiency farms struggle with just 45 cows on the same equipment.

The Facility Mistakes That Haunt Farmers

The Calgary study found something that should give everyone pause: 68% of farmers would do something differently during installation, with facility modifications topping the list of regrets.

We’re not talking minor tweaks here. These are fundamental design decisions that compound into permanent profitability problems.

A Michigan producer took a different approach worth noting: “We visited fifteen robotic dairies before finalizing our facility design. The three most successful operations all emphasized the same point—cow flow is everything.”

Three Design Elements That Can Make or Break Your Operation

Feed Space—The Hidden Killer

The Dairyland Initiative in Wisconsin has repeatedly shown that retrofitting four-row barns—where everyone tries to save money—creates permanent bottlenecks.

These facilities typically give you 12 to 18 inches of feed space per cow when you need 24 inches minimum. What happens? Subordinate cows see their feed intake drop 15 to 25%. Your fetching requirements jump from a manageable 5% to 20% of the herd. And lameness rates climb from a typical 20% to a devastating 35-45%.

I’ve seen this mistake too many times. Farmers think they can make that old four-row barn work. It rarely does.

Traffic Flow—More Than Philosophy

The choice between free and guided traffic isn’t just a matter of management philosophy—it’s economics.

Farms trying to save 40 to 60 thousand on selection gates often discover that their “savings” create massive waiting times. Research in Animal Welfare Science from 2022 showed that this reduces lying time from the required 12 to 14 hours to just 9 to 11 hours. You know what happens when cows don’t get enough rest—lameness goes up, production goes down.

Backup Capacity—The Insurance You Hope You’ll Never Need

Despite dealer assurances that all cows will adapt, the Calgary research shows that 2% of herds need culling because they won’t work with robots. Plus, fresh cow management requires special protocols.

An experienced farmer put it bluntly: “You can’t avoid having some backup milking capacity. The cull rate’s too high if you require everyone to be robot-trained.”

Who Actually Benefits from Automation

The industry often talks about labor savings driving automation, but the challenges are real. USDA data from this year shows immigrant workers make up 51% of the dairy workforce while producing 79% of U.S. milk. With 38.8% annual turnover creating measurable production losses, something’s gotta give.

But here’s what I’ve learned—successful automation requires specific labor economics.

Minnesota’s breakeven analysis this year shows that robots become competitive when labor costs range from $22 to $32 per hour (depending on production gains), or when turnover exceeds 50% annually. Ideally, you have both.

For farms with stable workforces at $18 to $20 per hour—common in many rural areas—the economics often don’t support automation regardless of other factors. As one Nebraska farmer explained, “We have great employees who’ve been with us 10-plus years. Robots would’ve solved a problem we don’t have.”

When Everything Goes Right: A Success Story

Let me share what success looks like based on several Vermont operations I’ve worked with that represent that successful 28%.

One particular farm began in 2021, selecting for robot traits while still milking in their double-8 parlor. “We genomic tested every animal and started culling hard for robot efficiency traits,” they explained.

By the time they installed four DeLaval robots in 2023, 40% of their 240-cow herd already had favorable genetics. They built a new freestall barn explicitly designed for robots—about a $1.7 million investment that hurt, but they had the capital reserves.

“We could’ve retrofitted for $800,000,” they noted, “but after visiting twelve robot farms, we saw how facility compromises created permanent problems.”

Today, successful operations like these are achieving 90 to 95 pounds per day, with robots running at 2.0 to 2.2 kilos per minute. Many report annual labor cost reductions of 40-50%. But what really matters to these families—they’re coaching youth hockey, returning to off-farm careers part-time, actually having a life outside the barn.

“This technology transformed our operation,” one farmer told me. “But I tell neighbors straight up—if you can’t absorb significant losses for three years and invest in genetics and facilities, wait. This isn’t for everyone.”

The Questions That Predict Success or Failure

After analyzing hundreds of operations, researchers have identified the key diagnostic question that predicts success with remarkable accuracy:

Can you comfortably absorb $100,000 in annual losses for three consecutive years while investing an additional $150,000 in facility corrections and genetic improvements—without threatening your farm’s survival?

If you can’t confidently say yes, the research suggests waiting or exploring alternatives. This single question brings together every critical factor: scale, capital reserves, commitment to the timeline, and strategic thinking capacity.

There’s also the temperament piece. Ask yourself: Am I comfortable with data-driven decision making rather than hands-on control? Can I wait 24 to 48 hours for technical support instead of fixing things immediately? Will I accept that 5-8% of cows will always need fetching?

That last one’s important—perfectionism becomes a liability with robots.

Dutch research from 2020 found something surprising: farmers who quit robotic milking actually scored higher on conscientiousness scales than those who successfully adopted robotic milking. The characteristics that make excellent conventional dairy farmers—disciplined, hard-working, hands-on—can work against you with systems requiring indirect management.

Making Sense of It All: Who Should Actually Buy Robots

Based on everything we’re seeing, clear patterns emerge for different situations.

You’re a Strong Candidate (about 28 to 40% of farms) If You Have:

  • 121 or more cows with plans to maintain or expand
  • High-wage labor markets ($24+ per hour) or severe turnover (over 50%)
  • Capital reserves to absorb $250,000 to $400,000 in losses and corrections over three years
  • Already started genetic selection for robot traits at least two years before installation
  • Willingness to build new or invest in proper retrofits ($1.2 million plus)
  • Comfort with systems thinking and data-driven management

Proceed with Extreme Caution (about 40 to 50% of farms) If You Have:

  • 60 to 120 cows—remember, scale economics work against this group
  • Moderate labor costs ($18 to $22 per hour) with manageable turnover
  • Limited capital requiring minimal facility retrofits
  • Haven’t begun genetic selection for robot efficiency
  • Need profitability within 2 to 3 years
  • Preference for hands-on problem solving over remote management

Consider Alternatives (about 20 to 30% of farms) If You Have:

  • Under 60 cows without expansion plans
  • Stable, affordable labor force
  • Existing facilities requiring extensive modification
  • Management style strongly favoring direct control
  • Can’t absorb three years of potential losses

The Bottom Line

What we’re learning about robotic milking challenges many of the assumptions we’ve held for years.

Quality-of-life improvements? They’re absolutely real and valuable. That 86% recommendation rate reflects genuine lifestyle benefits. But—and this is important—quality of life doesn’t automatically translate to profitability. I’ve seen too many farms discover this the hard way.

The 72% profitability gap is sobering but manageable if you understand what you’re getting into. Only 28% achieve the 5-plus-pound daily gains needed for clear profitability, according to Minnesota’s analysis. But understanding the specific requirements lets you make an informed decision rather than just hoping for the best.

Timeline expectations need radical adjustment, too. Full optimization takes 5 to 8 years, not the 1 to 2 years dealers suggest. Start genetic selection 2 to 3 years before installation and expect marginal performance for the first couple of years of operation. This isn’t pessimism—it’s realism based on what farmers have actually experienced.

Facility design really does determine destiny. Those 68% who regret their installation decisions teach us a powerful lesson: cutting corners on facility design creates permanent barriers to profitability. Proper design typically requires $1.2 to $2.2 million for most operations. If that number makes you uncomfortable… well, that’s valuable self-knowledge.

And scale economics aren’t what we thought. That 61 to 120 cow “dead zone” where robots actually decrease profitability challenges everything we’ve assumed about modernization improving economics. This has profound implications for mid-sized family farms—the backbone of our industry in many regions.

The dairy industry’s at an interesting crossroads. Technology adoption is accelerating even as economic pressures intensify. Robotic milking represents a genuine transformation for the 28 to 40% of operations that have the right combination of scale, capital, management style, and long-term commitment. For these farms, the technology really does deliver.

But for the majority—those who lack critical success factors at 60 to 72%—the technology might create more challenges than solutions. When you look at industry projections suggesting growth from $3.39 billion to $19.5 billion by 2035, those numbers require adoption rates that probably exceed the population of farms that are actually good candidates.

The lesson isn’t that robotic milking is good or bad. It’s that complex agricultural technologies require an honest assessment of your individual situation rather than following narratives about what’s “inevitable.”

The farmers succeeding with robots aren’t just early adopters or tech enthusiasts. They’re operations whose specific circumstances align perfectly with the technology’s requirements.

As that Vermont farmer put it perfectly: “This technology is amazing—for the right farm, at the right scale, with the right preparation. The challenge is being honest about whether you’re that farm.”

And honestly? That’s the conversation we all need to be having.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • The One Question That Matters: Can you lose $100K/year for 3 years? If no, skip robots. Only 28% ever see profit.
  • The Scale Trap: 60-120 cows = robot dead zone (you’ll lose money). Under 60 or over 120 = potential profit.
  • The Timeline Nobody Tells You: Year 1-3: Losses. Year 4-5: Breakeven. Year 5-8: Maybe profit. Plan accordingly.
  • Your Best Cows Are Your Biggest Problem: High producers often fail at robots. Efficiency beats volume every time.
  • The Real Math: Dealers say $9K/year costs. Reality: $30-45K. Triple everything, including disappointment.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 

The robot revolution has a secret: it’s only working for 28% of dairy farms. After tracking 217 operations, researchers discovered a brutal truth—farms with 60-120 cows (nearly half of U.S. dairies) actually lose money with robots, while those below 60 or above 120 can profit. Success demands crushing requirements: 0,000 in loss tolerance, 5-8 years of genetic prep, and willingness to cull your best producers for efficiency. Yet 86% of farmers still recommend robots, creating false confidence that drives unsuitable operations toward financial disaster. The industry needs these failures to hit its $19 billion target by 2035. One question predicts your fate: Can you bleed $100,000 a year for 3 years and survive?

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Robotic Milking
Tags : , , , , , ,

The $300 Million Overrun You’re Paying For: Inside Dairy’s $11 Billion Labor Crisis

Tuesday, November 18th, 2025

What farmers are discovering about the gap between processing expansion and workforce reality—and the practical lessons emerging from projects like Darigold’s Pasco plant

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. dairy industry is pouring $11 billion into processing plants it can’t staff—and farmers are paying for this disconnect through devastating milk check deductions. Darigold’s Pasco facility exemplifies the crisis: costs exploded from $600 million to over $900 million, forcing 300 member farms to cover the overrun at $4 per hundredweight, slashing their income by 20-25%. This infrastructure boom collides with an existential workforce crisis where immigrant workers, who produce 79% of America’s milk, face deportation while dairy remains locked out of legal visa programs that other agricultural sectors freely use. Farmers had no vote on these massive expansions, yet cooperative governance ensures they absorb all losses while contractors pocket overrun profits and board members face zero consequences. Some producers are finding lifelines through direct-to-consumer sales (commanding 400-600% premiums), smaller regional cooperatives, and strategic production management, but these are individual escapes from a systemic failure. Without fundamental reforms in cooperative governance and immigration policy, the industry will complete these factories just in time to discover there’s nobody left to run them—or milk the cows.

dairy governance risk
The largest ever investment in Darigold’s 100-year history, the Pasco plant stands to solidify the Northwest region among dairy producing regions for generations to come.

You know that feeling when you watch a neighbor build a massive new freestall barn, and you can’t help but wonder—who exactly is going to milk all those cows?

That’s not just a neighborhood curiosity anymore. It is the $11 billion question hanging over the entire dairy industry. Except we aren’t talking about barns; we’re talking about processing plants. And the answer is costing you $4.00 per hundredweight.

[IMAGE TAG: Wide shot of massive dairy processing plant under construction with empty parking lots]

So here’s what’s happening. When Darigold opened its new Pasco, Washington processing facility this past June, they had every reason to celebrate. The 500,000-square-foot facility can handle 8 million pounds of milk daily—that’s enough capacity to churn out 280 million pounds of powdered milk and 175 million pounds of butter annually. The technology really is impressive—state-of-the-art dryers, low-emission burners, the whole nine yards.

But here’s where it gets complicated, and you probably know where I’m going with this. That shiny new plant ended up costing over $900 million, even though the original budget was $600 million. That’s a 50% overrun, and if you’re shipping to Darigold, you already know who’s paying for it—their 300 member farms are covering it through that $4 per hundredweight deduction from milk checks.

Darigold’s Pasco plant overran by $300M—and 300 member farms absorbed it all through $4/cwt deductions

I’ve been talking with producers who say it accounts for 20-25% of their payments. Think about that for a minute. You’re already juggling feed costs that won’t quit, trying to find workers who’ll actually show up, dealing with market swings that’d make your head spin, and suddenly a quarter of your milk check disappears to cover someone else’s construction overrun.

“A quarter of your milk check disappears to cover someone else’s construction overrun while you struggle with feed costs, labor shortages, and market volatility.”

What’s interesting is that Pasco isn’t some weird outlier. The International Dairy Foods Association released their October report showing we’re looking at over $11 billion in new processing capacity coming online between now and 2028. We’re talking over 50 major projects here—it’s the largest infrastructure expansion I’ve seen in… well, honestly, ever.

And yet—and this is the kicker—this massive bet on processing capacity is running headfirst into a reality that anyone who’s tried to hire a milker recently knows all too well. We simply can’t find enough workers to operate the facilities we’ve already got, let alone staff new ones.

Quick Facts: The $11 Billion Reality Check

  • Total Infrastructure Investment: $11+ billion (2025-2028)
  • Major Projects: 50+ processing facilities announced or under construction
  • Darigold Overrun: $300 million (50% over budget)
  • Farmer Impact: $4/cwt deduction = 20-25% payment reduction
  • Farms Closing in 2025: 2,800 operations
  • Workforce Reality: 51% immigrant workers producing 79% of the U.S. milk

Understanding the Infrastructure Surge

Let me walk you through what’s actually being built out there, because the scale really is something else.

Chobani broke ground on a $1.2 billion facility in Rome, New York, back in April. Governor Hochul’s office is promising 1,000+ jobs and the capacity to process 12 million pounds of milk daily. Now, I’ve driven through that region recently—beautiful country, no doubt about it. But here’s what’s nagging at me: New York lost more than half its dairy farms between 2009 and 2022. The Census of Agriculture data doesn’t lie. So where exactly is all that milk going to come from?

Then you’ve got Hilmar Cheese Company’s operation in Dodge City, Kansas. It’s a $600+ million plant that started running this past March. They designed it to process 8 million pounds of milk daily, supposedly creating 250 jobs. But here’s what’s interesting—and this is November, mind you—they’re still scrambling to fill critical positions. Maintenance mechanics, facilitators, and milk receivers for night shifts. These aren’t entry-level gigs where you can train someone up in a week. These are technical roles that require people who know what they’re doing.

Fairlife—you know, the Coca-Cola folks—they’re building a $650 million ultra-filtration facility in Webster, New York. It’s part of what the state’s calling a $2.8 billion surge in dairy processing investments. Largest state investment in the nation, they say.

Michael Dykes, over at the International Dairy Foods Association, he’s confident about all this expansion. In their October industry report, he said: “Don’t fret for one moment—dairy farmers hear the market calling for milk. Milk will come.”

I appreciate the optimism, I really do. And on paper, it makes sense. Global dairy demand is growing, especially in Southeast Asia. Export opportunities are expanding. Processing innovation is creating new product categories we couldn’t have imagined ten years ago.

What could go wrong, right?

Well, let me tell you what’s already going wrong.

The Labor Reality Check

[IMAGE TAG: Split screen showing empty milking parlor positions vs. ICE raid at dairy farm]

Here’s the number that should keep every processor awake at night—and probably keeps many of you awake too. Texas A&M did a study in 2023, and the National Milk Producers Federation confirmed it: 51% of the dairy workforce consists of immigrant workers who produce 79% of America’s milk supply. I’ve cross-checked these numbers with multiple sources. If anything, they might be conservative.

Meanwhile—and this is where it gets frustrating—the H-2A temporary agricultural worker program has grown from about 48,000 certified positions back in 2005 to nearly 380,000 in fiscal 2024. Department of Labor tracks all this. But dairy? We’re completely locked out. Why? Because their regulations say work has to be “seasonal or temporary.”

Last I checked, cows need milking 365 days a year. They don’t take vacations.

“51% of the dairy workforce consists of immigrant workers who produce 79% of America’s milk. Yet dairy is locked out of H-2A visas because cows don’t take vacations.”

51% of dairy workers produce 79% of U.S. milk—the uncomfortable truth about American agriculture

What really gets me is that sheep herding operations—sheep herding!—have H-2A access, even though that’s year-round work too. It’s right there in the H-2A Herder Final Rule if you want to look it up. Jaime Castaneda, who handles policy for the National Milk Producers Federation, he’s been beating this drum for years. As he told me, “We have written to the Department of Labor a number of different times and actually even pointed to the fact that the sheep herding industry has access to H-2A, and it’s a very similar industry to dairy.”

But nothing changes.

And it’s not just dairy facing this squeeze. The Associated Builders and Contractors released its 2025 workforce report: the construction industry needs 439,000 additional workers this year just to meet demand. This labor shortage is exactly what’s driving delays and cost overruns on these dairy processing projects. Darigold learned that the hard way.

Workforce Crisis by the Numbers

Let me give you the regional breakdown, because it varies depending on where you’re farming:

  • Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin School for Workers did a survey in 2023. Found that 70% of dairy workers are undocumented. Seven out of ten.
  • South Dakota: The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows unemployment under 2%. You literally cannot find local workers.
  • Looking ahead, USDA’s Economic Research Service forecasts 5,000 unfilled dairy jobs by 2030.
  • Worst-case scenario: Cornell’s research suggests that if we saw full deportation, milk prices could rise by 90% and we’d lose 2.1 million cows from the national herd.

Lessons from the Darigold Experience

So let me dig into what actually happened with Darigold, because if you’re in a co-op—and most of us are—there are some important lessons here.

What Went Wrong

Back in September 2024, Darigold sent out an update to members trying to explain the delays and cost overruns. I’ve reviewed their communications and spoken with affected producers. Here’s what really happened.

First off, supply chain disruptions hit way harder than anyone expected. And I’m not talking about generic delays here. The specialized dairy processing equipment—most of it comes from Europe—faced 12-18 month lead times instead of the usual 6-9 months. When you’re building something this complex, one delayed component throws everything off. It’s like dominoes.

Second, building regulations changed mid-construction. The Port of Pasco confirmed this in their regulatory filings. These weren’t just minor tweaks either. We’re talking structural changes that required completely new engineering calculations, new permits, and the works.

Third—and this is what really killed them—labor shortages in construction trades meant paying absolutely premium rates for skilled workers. You need specialized stainless steel welders who can work to food-grade standards? You can’t just grab someone off the street. Local construction sources tell me these folks were commanding $45-50 per hour plus benefits. And honestly? They were worth it because you couldn’t get the job done without them.

The plant was originally supposed to open in early 2024. It didn’t actually start operations until mid-2025. By September 2024, Stan Ryan, Darigold’s CEO, had to admit to the Tri-City Herald that it was only 60% complete, with costs already over $900 million.

How Farmers Are Paying the Price

This is where it gets personal for a lot of us. To cover the overrun, Darigold implemented what they’re calling a “temporary” deduction structure. I’ve seen the letters they sent to members. The language is… well, it’s stark.

Jason Vander Kooy runs Harmony Dairy near Mount Vernon, Washington—about 1,400 cows with his brother Eric. What he told Capital Press in May really stuck with me:

“There are a lot of guys who don’t want to quit farming, but can’t keep farming if this continues. The problem is we don’t have any other options. We just can’t leave the plant half constructed and walk away.”

Dan DeRuyter’s operation in Yakima County? They lost almost $5 million over 2 years due to these deductions. Five million. He told Capital Press, “It’s awful. I can’t go on much longer. I don’t think producers will be able to stay in business.”

“Dan DeRuyter’s dairy lost almost $5 million over two years from deductions to cover Darigold’s construction overruns. ‘I don’t think producers will be able to stay in business.'”

What strikes me about these stories—and maybe you’re feeling this too—is that these aren’t struggling operations. These are successful, multi-generational farms that suddenly find themselves cash-flow negative because of decisions they had no real say in making.

John DeJong’s family has been shipping to Darigold for 75 years. Seventy-five years! He put it pretty bluntly: “The deduction has eliminated investment. We’re more in survival mode. This is not a sustainable position—to dip into producers’ pockets.”

The Governance Question

Now, this is where things get interesting—and maybe a little uncomfortable—from a cooperative governance perspective.

Darigold said in their June announcement that “farmer-owners approved the Pasco project in 2021.” But when you dig into what that actually means… well, it’s not what most folks would consider democratic approval.

Based on how cooperative governance typically works—and on the extensive research by agricultural law experts at the University of Wisconsin—the approval probably came through board representatives rather than a direct member vote. Think about it. When was the last time your co-op asked you to vote on specific project budgets? On contractor selections? On who bears the risk if things go sideways?

Cornell’s cooperative research program has documented this pattern. Major capital investments often proceed based on board decisions, with members learning about cost overruns only when the deductions appear on milk checks.

I should mention that when I reached out, Darigold declined to provide specific details about their member approval process. They cited confidentiality of internal governance procedures. Make of that what you will.

The Immigration Policy Disconnect

You can’t talk about dairy labor without addressing the elephant in the barn—immigration policy. And boy, is this getting complicated.

Farmers Caught in Political Contradictions

I’ve spent a lot of time talking with farmers about this lately, and the cognitive dissonance is real.

Take Greg Moes. He manages a four-generation dairy operation near Goodwin, South Dakota, with 40 workers—half of them foreign-born. There was this CNN interview back in December that’s been making the rounds. Moes said: “We will not have food… grocery store shelves could be emptied within two days if the labor force disappears.”

Then there’s John Rosenow, who runs Roseholm-Wolfe Dairy up in Buffalo County, Wisconsin. Eighteen workers, half foreign-born. He told PBS Wisconsin this past October: “I’m out of business. And it wouldn’t take long.”

“We’re voting against our own workforce. I’m not making a political statement here, just observing the contradiction that’s tearing rural communities apart.”

What’s fascinating—and frankly, a bit troubling—is how many of these same farmers vote for politicians promising strict immigration enforcement. It’s like we’re voting against our own workforce. I’m not making a political statement here, just observing the contradiction that’s tearing rural communities apart.

Real-World Impact of Enforcement

And this isn’t theoretical anymore.

This past June, Homeland Security Investigations raided Isaak Bos’s dairy in Lovington, New Mexico. Multiple news outlets covered it. The operation lost 35 out of 55 workers in a single day. Milk production basically stopped. Bos had to scramble—brought in family members, high school students on summer break, anybody who could help keep the livestock alive.

Nicole Elliott’s Drumgoon Dairy in South Dakota went through an I-9 audit. The Argus Leader reported she went from over 50 employees down to just 16. As she told reporters, “We’ve effectively turned off the tap, yet we have not made any efforts to establish a solution for acquiring employees in the dairy sector.”

What I’ve noticed—and maybe you’ve seen this too—is that after these raids, remaining workers often self-deport out of fear. It creates this cascade effect that ripples through entire dairy regions. One raid, and suddenly everybody’s looking over their shoulder.

Understanding the Financial Flow

[IMAGE TAG: Infographic showing money flow – $300M overrun split between contractors, designers, vendors vs farmers]

When we talk about a $300 million cost overrun, it’s worth understanding where that money actually goes—and who absorbs the losses. This isn’t abstract accounting. It’s real money from real farms.

Who Profits from Overruns

So I’ve been looking into this based on construction industry analysis and Engineering News-Record’s contractor rankings.

Construction contractors like Miron Construction—they had $1.74 billion in revenue in 2024, according to ENR’s Top 400 list—typically operate under cost-plus contracts. Their fees increase in proportion to project costs. When projects run over? Their percentage-based fees go up, too. It’s built into the system.

Design firms like E.A. Bonelli & Associates, who designed Darigold’s facility, typically charge 6-12% of total construction costs. That’s standard according to the American Institute of Architects. So a $300 million overrun? That can mean millions more in design fees. Not a bad day at the office.

Equipment vendors benefit from supply chain premiums and change orders. When specialized European equipment is scarce—and it has been—vendors can command premium prices. I’ve seen quotes for processing equipment jump 30-40% during the pandemic supply crunch. Supply and demand, right?

Public entities, such as the Port of Pasco, invested $25+ million in infrastructure to support the project, according to port commission records. They get the economic development win, the ribbon-cutting photo ops, regardless of whether farmers can afford the milk check deductions.

The Processor’s Perspective

Now, to be fair, I did reach out to several processor representatives to get their side of the story. Darigold declined specific comment, but an IDFA spokesperson—speaking on background—made some points worth considering:

“Processors are caught between rising global demand and workforce constraints just like farmers. These investments are made with 20-30 year horizons. Yes, there are challenges today, but we believe in the long-term future of American dairy. The alternative—not investing in capacity—means losing market share to international competitors.”

That’s a reasonable position. It really is. Even if it doesn’t help farmers paying today’s deductions for tomorrow’s theoretical benefits.

Who Bears the Cost

But at the end of the day, it comes down to this: the financial burden falls squarely on cooperative members. The 300 Darigold farms absorbed every penny of that overrun through milk check deductions. They had no direct vote on contractor selection. No control over budget management. No recourse when costs exploded.

“300 Darigold farms absorbed every penny of a $300 million overrun. No vote on contractors. No control over budgets. No recourse when costs exploded.”

Practical Paths Forward for Farmers

Given all these structural challenges, what realistic options do we actually have? I’ve been tracking several strategies that producers are using to create some alternatives.

1. Diversification Beyond Cooperatives

Direct-to-consumer sales are providing some farmers with genuine pricing power. The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund tracks this—28 states now allow raw milk sales in some form. Farmers I’ve talked with are getting $8-12 per gallon. That’s a 400-600% premium over conventional farmgate prices.

Direct-to-consumer sales command 400-600% premiums over commodity milk—a viable escape route from cooperative dependency

Cost Comparison Reality Check: Let me break down the numbers:

  • Conventional milk price: $18-20/cwt (works out to roughly $1.55-1.72/gallon)
  • Direct raw milk sales: $8-12/gallon
  • Investment needed: $50,000-150,000 for on-farm processing setup
  • Payback period: Generally 18-36 months if you shift 20% of production to direct sales

Even moving 20% of your production to direct sales can fundamentally change your negotiating position. You’re no longer completely dependent on that co-op milk check.

Dan Stauffer, a California dairy farmer I know, started an on-farm creamery specifically because—as she put it—”the $4.00 deduct combined with all the other standard deductions has made it impossible for us to cash flow.” She didn’t wait for reform. She built an alternative.

One important note, though: regulations vary significantly by state. What works in Pennsylvania won’t necessarily fly in Wisconsin. Always check with your state department of agriculture before making any moves.

2. Regional Cooperative Alternatives

Some farmers are successfully exploring smaller, regional cooperatives with more transparent governance. Research from the University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives shows these smaller co-ops often feature:

  • Direct member voting on major investments (imagine that!)
  • Transparent pricing tied to actual costs
  • Limited or no speculative facility construction
  • Focus on value-added products rather than commodity volume

The challenge? Leaving a major cooperative often involves exit fees, equity complications. But here’s what I’m seeing—when groups of farmers coordinate their intentions (legally, of course), cooperatives sometimes become more flexible on governance reforms. Funny how that works.

3. Advocacy for Practical Reforms

Rather than waiting for comprehensive federal legislation—which, let’s be honest, probably isn’t coming anytime soon—farmers are pursuing achievable state-level reforms.

In Wisconsin, a group of farmers filed formal complaints with the state Department of Agriculture regarding violations of cooperative governance. Outcomes are still pending, but it’s gotten attention.

Similarly, farmers in New York are working with their state attorney general’s office on transparency requirements for agricultural cooperatives. These aren’t radical demands. Just basic stuff like seeing the actual construction contracts before being asked to pay for overruns.

4. Strategic Production Management

This one’s delicate, but some farmers are discovering they can influence cooperative behavior through coordinated (but legal) production decisions. If enough members strategically manage production volumes, it creates leverage for governance reforms.

I’m not talking about illegal collusion here. Just individual business decisions that happen to align. When cooperatives see milk volumes dropping, board meetings suddenly become much more interesting.

Key Industry Trends to Watch

Based on conversations I’ve had with industry analysts and extension economists, here’s what I’m tracking:

Processing capacity utilization: Multiple sources suggest plants will operate at 65-75% capacity through 2026 due to milk supply constraints from labor shortages. That’s going to create margin pressure throughout the system. No way around it.

Consolidation acceleration: USDA data shows 2,800 farms closed in 2025. And that’s not the peak—it’s the baseline. Mid-size operations (500-1,500 cows) are facing the greatest pressure. I’m particularly worried about dairies in that sweet spot—too big to go niche but too small to achieve mega-dairy economies of scale.

2,800 dairy farms closed in 2025 alone—nearly double the baseline. The consolidation accelerates while processors invest $11 billion

Immigration policy evolution: Watch for potential executive orders creating temporary pathways for dairy workers. Congressional solutions remain blocked, but I’m hearing administrative workarounds are being discussed at USDA. Sources familiar with the discussions say something might be coming, but I’ll believe it when I see it.

Cooperative governance pressure: The Darigold situation has awakened member interest in governance reform across multiple cooperatives. I’m hearing rumblings from DFA and Land O’ Lakes members about demanding more transparency. About time, if you ask me.

Alternative marketing growth: Direct sales, regional brands, on-farm processing—all continuing to expand. The economics are compelling. Capturing even a portion of that processor-to-retail margin changes everything.

Practical Takeaways for Dairy Farmers

After researching this issue and talking with dozens of farmers, here’s my best advice:

1. Understand your cooperative’s governance structure. Get copies of the bylaws. Read them. Actually read them. Request documentation of how major capital decisions are made. Know your rights—you might have more than you think.

2. Evaluate diversification options. Run the numbers on direct sales or value-added processing. Even if you don’t pull the trigger, knowing your alternatives strengthens your position.

3. Document workforce challenges. Keep detailed records of recruitment efforts, wage offers, and position vacancies. This data matters for policy advocacy and might be required for future visa programs.

4. Build regional alliances. There’s strength in numbers. Coordinated action among neighboring farms—whether for governance reform, marketing alternatives, or workforce solutions—multiplies individual leverage.

5. Monitor capacity developments. Understanding regional processing capacity and utilization rates helps inform production and marketing decisions. If your processor is running at 60% capacity, that affects your negotiating position.

6. Prepare for workforce disruption. Develop contingency plans now. Cross-train employees, investigate automation options where feasible, and build relationships with temporary labor providers. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

The Road Ahead

Looking at this $11 billion infrastructure investment, I see both dairy’s ambition and its fundamental challenge. We’re building world-class processing capacity while the workforce foundation—both on farms and in plants—is crumbling beneath us.

The Darigold experience isn’t just a cautionary tale. It’s a preview of what happens when expansion proceeds without addressing underlying structural issues. Farmers pay the price while contractors, consultants, and executives move on to the next project.

What’s become clear to me is that the disconnect between processing infrastructure and workforce reality isn’t just a temporary mismatch. It’s a structural crisis that requires fundamental reforms in how cooperatives govern themselves, how immigration policy treats agricultural workers, and how the industry plans for the future.

For dairy farmers navigating this environment, waiting for top-down solutions while writing checks for bottom-up failures isn’t sustainable. The operations that survive and thrive will be those that recognize the current system’s limitations and actively build alternatives—whether through direct marketing, governance reform, or strategic cooperation with like-minded producers.

The infrastructure bet has been placed. The steel is welded, and the dryers are installed. Now we need to ensure farmers aren’t the only ones covering the spread when the dice don’t roll our way.

Because at the end of the day, all those shiny new plants don’t mean a damn thing if there’s nobody left to milk the cows—or if the farmers have gone broke paying for the factory’s cost overruns.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Check your cooperative governance NOW: If your board can approve $50M+ projects without direct member vote, you’re one announcement away from a $4/cwt deduction. Demand to see construction contracts, board votes, and risk allocation before the next expansion—farmers discovering they have legal recourse for unapproved overruns.
  • Build your escape route before you need it: Direct-to-consumer sales command $8-12/gallon (vs. $1.72 conventional) with $50-150K setup costs and 18-36 month payback. Moving just 20% of production creates leverage and covers deduction losses—28 states allow it, but check regulations first.
  • Document everything related to the workforce crisis: keep detailed records of every recruitment attempt, wage offers ($45-50/hr for skilled positions), and unfilled positions. You’ll need this evidence when immigration reform finally comes or when explaining why you can’t meet production contracts after raids.
  • Power comes from numbers, not hoping: Cooperative boards ignore individual complaints but panic when 10+ farms coordinate action. Whether demanding governance reforms, exploring alternative cooperatives, or strategic production management—allied farmers are getting results while solo operators just get bills.

Learn More: 

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

Boot Biosecurity’s 2,795% ROI: The $820 Investment Beating $250,000 Robots

Tuesday, November 11th, 2025

One infected visitor can cost you $128,250 (H5N1). Boot stations cost $820. Every major dairy that installed them reports zero outbreaks since. Facts.

Executive Summary: Boot wash stations deliver the dairy industry’s best-kept secret: 2,795% ROI for just $820, preventing $96,000+ in disease losses that Penn State, Michigan State, and UC-Davis have meticulously documented. While farms invest $250,000 in robots returning 30% over a decade, bacteria on contaminated boots survive 24 hours, travel 400 feet, and devastate herds—yet three simple steps (scrape, wash, disinfect) stop them cold. Wisconsin producers with stations report 60% fewer calf deaths and haven’t had major outbreaks in 18+ months. The math is embarrassingly clear: two-month payback versus eight years for that robot. Yet most dairies still lack this basic protection, choosing complex technology over proven prevention. The question isn’t whether boot stations work—it’s why you don’t already have them.

Dairy Biosecurity ROI

You know how it is at industry meetings—everyone’s talking about the latest technology. Last month at the Wisconsin Dairy Expo, I got into this fascinating conversation with a group of producers comparing notes on recent investments. Robotic milkers, automated calf feeders, precision nutrition systems… the usual suspects. Then someone mentioned they’d just put in boot wash stations, and honestly, the whole conversation shifted.

What’s interesting is how this matches a pattern I’ve been noticing across the industry. Here we are, investing heavily in automation—which makes sense, don’t get me wrong—but some of the best returns are coming from the simplest investments. And when I started digging into the numbers… well, they surprised even me.

“The payback for preventing just one Salmonella outbreak? About two months.”

The math is embarrassingly clear: a $2,460 investment in three boot wash stations delivers up to 2,795% ROI over five years—that’s 93 times better returns than a quarter-million-dollar robot. While the industry obsesses over six-figure automation, the highest-return biosecurity investment costs less than a bred heifer.

The Investment Gap Nobody Talks About

So here’s what got me thinking. I’ve been looking at disease prevention data from Penn State Extension, Michigan State’s veterinary economics team, and the Canadian Dairy Network. When you compare the cost of a single boot wash station—about $820 installed—against the disease losses it prevents, the returns are extraordinary. Scale that up to three stations for comprehensive coverage at $2,460, and you’re looking at returns between 719% and 2,795% over five years. Meanwhile, that quarter-million-dollar robot we all admire? Generally delivers returns of 20-30% over a decade.

Disease NameAnnual Cost Per Farm ($)Boot Station Cost ($)ROI Multiple (X times)
Salmonella D.$13,860$82017x
Cryptosporid.$9,214$82011x
Johne’s Dis.$18,000$82022x
Digital Derm.$20,000$82024x
H5N1 (Single)$128,250$820156x

Now, that raises an obvious question, doesn’t it? Why are we hesitating on something this profitable?

During my farm visits this season, I’ve been asking producers about their biosecurity priorities, and the responses have been… enlightening. You know, UC-Davis researchers—Pires and his team published this fascinating work in the Journal of Dairy Science—showed that bacteria in manure can survive on boot surfaces for up to 24 hours. They tracked pathogen movement nearly 400 feet across plastic surfaces. About 150 feet on concrete.

Just think about that for a minute. Your hoof trimmer shows up at dawn, and he was at another farm yesterday. Your nutritionist stops by after visiting three other dairies this morning. The milk hauler who’s been in every parlor in the region… Each one represents a potential disease introduction, yet we rarely think about it the same way we analyze, say, feed efficiency or genetic improvements.

What Disease Actually Costs

Let me share what the extension services and university research teams have documented—and these aren’t worst-case scenarios, they’re documented averages for a typical 450-cow operation.

Quick Disease Cost Reality Check:

DiseaseAnnual CostPreventable?
Salmonella Dublin$13,860/outbreakYes, via boot hygiene
Cryptosporidium$9,214/yearYes, major route
Johne’s Disease$18,000/yearYes, if kept out
Digital Dermatitis$15,000-25,000Yes, trimmer transmission
H5N1$128,250+Yes, documented boot spread

Penn State Extension’s 2024 analysis shows a Salmonella Dublin outbreak runs about $13,860 in direct losses. Michigan State’s research puts the cost of endemic cryptosporidium at $9,214 annually. The Canadian Dairy Network documents $18,000 yearly for Johne ‘s-infected herds—with no cure available.

Compare that to boot station costs: $820 for your highest-risk entry point, or $2,460 for three-station comprehensive coverage, plus about $1,850 annually for disinfectant and maintenance. The payback for preventing just one Salmonella outbreak? About two months.

Why Calves Are Ground Zero

Dr. Jennifer Bentley at Wisconsin’s vet school has this way of putting it that really resonates: “Calves under 30 days represent your operation’s highest disease risk, period.”

The vulnerability facts are sobering:

  • Newborn calves operate at 20-50% of adult immune capacity
  • Maternal antibodies are half depleted by day 28 (Cornell QMPS data)
  • Enhanced biosecurity reduces calf mortality from 5.9% to under 4% (Estonian research, 118 herds)
  • External biosecurity ranks in the top five factors affecting calf survival

I keep hearing the same thing from California producers: excellent genetics, premium milk replacer, perfect ventilation—none of it matters if someone tracks crypto into your calf barn on dirty boots.

The Three-Step Process That Actually Works

Purdue researchers proved what most farms ignore: stepping through disinfectant with manure-caked boots provides zero protection, regardless of how expensive that disinfectant is. The three-step sequence—scrape, wash, disinfect—is the ONLY protocol that works. Skip one step and you’re operating on faith, not science.

Here’s something Purdue University’s research revealed that really challenges our assumptions: disinfectant type becomes completely irrelevant if you don’t remove organic matter first. They proved definitively that stepping through even the most expensive disinfectant with manure-caked boots provides zero effective pathogen control.

The only sequence that works:

  1. Mechanical scraping – Remove visible contamination
  2. Washing with brushes and water – Eliminate residual material
  3. Chemical disinfection – Only effective on clean boots

Skip any step and you’re operating on faith rather than science.

Strategic Placement: The 13-Fold Compliance Difference

Here’s what kills biosecurity programs: putting boot stations where workers can avoid them. Canadian researchers used RFID tracking to prove optimal placement delivers 90% compliance versus 7% for poor placement—a 13-fold difference that has nothing to do with training and everything to do with physics. Stop fighting human nature and start using it.

Canadian RFID monitoring research (Frontiers in Veterinary Science) documented something remarkable. Placement impacts compliance by a factor of thirteen. A well-positioned station gets 90% usage. A poorly placed one? Seven percent.

Optimal placement priorities:

  • Calf barn entrances – Highest vulnerability point
  • Maternity pen access – Protect those critical first hours
  • Hospital pen entry/exit – Bidirectional protection essential
  • Age group transitions – Prevent adult-to-youngstock transmission

Your Implementation Roadmap

Based on what’s working for successful producers:

Month 1: Start With One Station ($820)

  • Install at your highest-risk location (typically calf barn)
  • Establish protocols and culture
  • Track baseline health metrics

Months 2-3: Build Momentum

  • Add maternity pen coverage
  • Implement visitor protocols (boot covers: $0.50 each)
  • Train on the critical three-step process

Months 4-6: Complete Coverage ($2,460 total)

  • Install hospital pen stations
  • Integrate with broader biosecurity
  • Establish maintenance responsibilities

The Technology Partnership

What’s particularly encouraging is seeing operations recognize that technology and biosecurity aren’t competing investments—they’re synergistic.

Take automated calf feeders. Great technology. But I’ve seen operations where one infected calf deposits crypto on shared nipples, efficiently delivering pathogens to everyone. Compare that to Wisconsin operations using identical feeders but with boot hygiene preventing crypto introduction. The technology performs as designed because the disease isn’t undermining it.

This pattern repeats everywhere:

  • Robotic milkers achieve potential when herds stay mastitis-free
  • Activity monitors catch problems that escape good biosecurity
  • Genetic programs deliver when calves survive to production

Common Implementation Challenges

Winter Operations:

  • Install stations inside doorways when possible
  • Use heated water lines or warm water buckets
  • Switch to cold-weather disinfectants (Virkon S works near freezing)
  • Have a plan before temperatures drop

Low Compliance After Installation:

  • Check placement first—is it in the natural flow of traffic?
  • Examine time allocation—are employees too rushed?
  • Address root causes, not symptoms

The Bottom Line Investment Analysis

InvestmentCost5-Year ROIPayback
One Boot Station$820400-1,500%2-3 months
Three Stations$2,460719-2,795%1.5-2.1 months
Robotic Milker$250,00020-30%6-8 years
Auto Calf Feeder$180,00015-25%5-7 years

The math clearly supports boot station investment, yet adoption remains inconsistent. A Wisconsin producer captured it perfectly: “We’ll invest $5,000 in feed additives, hoping for 2% production increases while hesitating over $820 boot stations that prevent thousands in losses.”

Wisconsin farms stopped theorizing and started measuring. Within 90 days of installing $2,460 worth of boot stations: 60% fewer dead calves, zero major outbreaks for 18+ months, and $96,000+ in prevented disease losses. That’s a 1.8-month payback period. Now tell me again why you’re hesitating on this investment.

Your Next Steps

The path forward is straightforward. Start with one boot wash station at your most vulnerable location—probably the calf barn entrance. Just $820 to protect your highest-risk animals. Implement the three-step cleaning protocol. Document your health metrics for three months.

Based on what I’m seeing from producers who’ve taken this step, you’ll likely find yourself planning stations 2 and 3 before month 4. The economics are that compelling, the results that consistent.

This isn’t about choosing between technology and biosecurity. It’s about recognizing that your sophisticated systems perform best when built on a solid foundation of disease prevention. And in an industry facing mounting disease pressure and tightening margins, that foundation—starting at just $820—might be the most important investment you make this year.

Your banker will appreciate the economics. Your employees will appreciate healthier animals. And those expensive automated systems? They’ll finally deliver what you paid for.

The choice, as always, is yours. But the math—and the growing number of success stories—suggest this is one investment decision that’s actually pretty straightforward.

The industry’s dirty secret exposed in one chart: you’ll wait eight years for that quarter-million-dollar robot to break even, but an $820 boot station pays for itself in two months—the time it takes to prevent a single Salmonella outbreak. That’s a 48x faster return on capital, yet we keep choosing complexity over cash flow.

Key Takeaways: 

  • The Math Nobody Can Argue With: $820 boot station = 2,795% ROI in 5 years. $250,000 robot = 30% ROI in 10 years. Stop choosing the wrong one.
  • The Only Process That Works: Disinfectant without scraping = zero protection. You MUST do all three: scrape → wash → disinfect. Skip one step and you’re playing pretend biosecurity.
  • The 13X Compliance Secret: Put stations IN doorways where people can’t avoid them (90% usage), not around corners where they will (7% usage). Physics beats willpower every time.
  • What Success Actually Looks Like: 60% fewer dead calves in 3 months. 18+ months without major outbreaks. $96,000+ in prevented losses. Wisconsin farms proved it—now it’s your turn.
  • Your Monday Morning Action: Order one $820 station for your calf barn entrance. Install it this week. Track calf health for 90 days. Watch what happens.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , ,

The Four Numbers Every Dairy Producer Needs to Calculate This Week

Monday, November 10th, 2025

26,000 dairy farms are expected to drop to 20,000 by 2028. Which side of that line are you on? Four numbers will tell you

Executive Summary:  With milk stuck below $14/cwt through 2026 while global production rises 3-6%, this isn’t a downturn—it’s a restructuring. Five permanent changes (beef-on-dairy heifer shortage, China’s self-sufficiency, technology cost gaps, fixed-cost production traps, and processor overcapacity) mean the old recovery playbook is dead. Right now, mega-dairies operate at $13.80/cwt, niche producers capture $8-12 premiums, but mid-sized farms (500-1,500 cows) hemorrhage cash at $18-21/cwt. I’ve developed a four-number framework—true cost per cwt, liquidity runway, competitive investment ratio, and niche premium potential—that reveals your best path forward in minutes. Calculate these this week to determine whether you should expand, pivot to premium markets, or execute a strategic exit while you control the terms. The industry will shrink from 26,000 to 20,000 farms by 2028, but producers who act decisively in the next 90 days can still position themselves to thrive.

Dairy Farm Business Strategy

You know, I was checking the CME futures board this morning—Class IV milk sitting below $14/cwt all the way through February 2026—and it really got me thinking about what we’re all dealing with right now. Here’s what’s interesting: while we’re staring at these terrible prices, the production reports from early October show New Zealand’s up 3% year-over-year, Ireland’s pumping out nearly 6% more milk, and Belgium’s somehow surging 6.5%.

You’d think somebody would cut back, right? But they can’t. And that’s what makes this whole situation fundamentally different from anything we’ve weathered before.

The Profitability Death Zone: Only mega-dairies survive below $14/cwt milk prices while mid-size operations hemorrhage $5-7 per hundredweight

The Five Structural Changes We’re All Navigating Together

The Beef-on-Dairy Shift That’s Bigger Than We Realized

The Beef-on-Dairy Revolution: Farmers are choosing $1,000 in 7 days over $3,850 invested for 30 months—and it’s permanently shrinking the heifer pipeline by 700,000-800,000 head

So here’s something that’s really caught my attention—and I think most of us have been surprised by how big this has gotten. The National Association of Animal Breeders’ latest sales data shows beef semen sales to dairy operations jumped almost 18% last year alone. What started as a way to manage margins has become something much more structural.

I was talking with a producer in central Wisconsin last week—third-generation operation, really sharp guy—and he walked me through his breeding decisions. With those week-old beef-cross calves bringing $800 to $1,200 at regional auctions (I saw some exceptional ones hit $1,400 at Dairyland), and compare that to the $3,200 to $4,500 it costs to raise a replacement heifer to breeding age… well, the math’s pretty clear. Penn State Extension’s budgets back this up, though honestly, if you’re in an area with higher feed costs, you might be looking at even more.

What’s particularly worth noting is how this revenue stream—often covering 12-16% of total farm income—has become essential for cash flow, especially for making those monthly debt service payments. But here’s the thing that’s really starting to bite: once you commit to this breeding strategy, you’re locked in for at least 30 months. That’s just biology—you can’t speed up getting a heifer from conception to first lactation.

I was chatting with one of CoBank’s dairy economists at a meeting recently, and they’re suggesting the US dairy heifer inventory could shrink by 700,000 to 800,000 head through 2027. Even if milk prices doubled tomorrow—and let’s be honest, we all know they won’t—we simply can’t produce replacement heifers any faster than nature allows.

China’s Role Has Completely Changed

China’s Demand Collapse: The global dairy safety valve that rescued oversupply in 2009 and 2015 has permanently closed—imports down 30% while domestic production soars past 42 million tonnes

Remember how China always seemed to bail us out? You probably know this pattern—2009, 2015… we’d get oversupplied, prices would tank, and then Chinese demand would gradually soak up the excess. Well, that playbook’s done, and we need to accept it.

The China Dairy Industry Association’s data shows their per capita consumption dropped from 14.4 kg in 2021 to 12.4 kg in 2022, and from what I’m hearing from folks in the export business, it hasn’t bounced back. Meanwhile—and this is what’s really changed the game—their domestic production hit nearly 42 million tonnes in 2023. They actually exceeded their own government targets.

Looking at the customs data from August, whole milk powder imports into China were down over 30% year-over-year, while skim milk powder imports were down about 23%. I’ve noticed many of us still talk about Chinese demand “recovering,” but honestly? They’re dealing with their own oversupply while facing declining birth rates and changing dietary preferences among younger consumers. That safety valve we used to count on… it’s gone.

The Technology Gap That’s Becoming a Canyon


Farm Size		CowsRobot InvestmentAnnual Debt ServiceProduction GainLabor SavingsNet Annual BenefitROI at $20ROI at $14
Mega-Dairy3,800$2.7M (12 robots)$220K+$684K+$840K+$1,304K✓ PROFITABLE✓ PROFITABLE
Mid-Size (TRAP)500$900K (4 robots)$85K+$90K+$280K+$285K✓ Barely profitable✗ LOSES MONEY
Small Farm180$450K (2 robots)$43K+$32K+$140K+$129K✗ Marginal✗ UNPROFITABLE

You probably already know this, but that USDA Economic Research Service report—”Profits, Costs, and the Changing Structure of Dairy Farming”—really lays it all out. Farms with 2,000+ cows are running total production costs around $23/cwt. Smaller operations with 100-199 cows? They’re looking at $32-33/cwt. That’s a $10 gap, and here’s the thing: technology is making it wider, not narrower.

My neighbor just got quotes for a robotic milking system—both DeLaval and Lely are quoting $180,000 to $230,000 per unit right now. For his 500-cow operation, he’s looking at a minimum of $900,000 for the robots alone, plus another $200,000 for barn modifications. At current Farm Credit rates—which are running 7.5-8.5% for most of us with decent credit—that’s $85,000 to $90,000 annually just in debt service.

Now, the big dairies installing these systems are seeing real gains—8-10 pounds more milk per cow daily, plus labor savings of $60,000 to $80,000 annually per robot. But here’s what nobody wants to say out loud at the co-op meetings: the return on investment only works at scale. University of Minnesota Extension did this analysis showing robots can be profitable at $20 milk but lose significant money at $15. And where are prices heading?

A producer out in California shared something interesting with me last month—they’ve got 3,800 cows, and went fully robotic two years ago. “Best decision we ever made,” he said, “but only because we had the volume to spread those fixed costs. My neighbor with 600 cows? Same robots would bankrupt him at these prices.”

Why We Keep Milking Even When We’re Losing Money

This one puzzles a lot of people outside the industry, but if you’ve been doing this a while, you get it. Cornell’s Program on Dairy Markets and Policy explained it really well in one of their recent webinars—pasture-based systems like those in New Zealand and Ireland have completely different cost structures than our confinement operations here in the States.

DairyNZ’s economic surveys show their typical operation has variable costs around NZ$4.50 per kilogram of milk solids—that works out to roughly $7/cwt for us—but fixed costs that come to about $12/cwt. Think about that for a minute. When milk drops to $12/cwt, if they stop milking, they still owe that $12 in fixed costs, but lose the $5 that’s at least helping cover some of it. So they keep milking, even at a loss.

Irish producers are in the same boat. Teagasc’s reports show that Irish dairy farmers invested over €2.2 billion in expansion after the abolition of quotas in 2015. Those loans don’t just disappear when milk prices crash. The Central Bank of Ireland’s latest data shows 64% of Irish dairy farms carrying debt averaging over €117,000. You can’t just turn that off.

Processing Plants Running Half Empty

Here’s something that doesn’t get enough attention, but it’s affecting all of us. The International Dairy Foods Association has been tracking this—US processors have invested billions in new plant capacity over the last few years, expecting the kind of production growth we saw in the 2010s. But USDA’s Milk Production reports show we’re growing at maybe 0.4-0.5% annually. They built for 2-3% growth.

I was talking with a cheese plant manager in Wisconsin last month—won’t name names, but you’d know the company—and he put it pretty bluntly: “We’ve got a $45 million plant running at 60% capacity. We need milk, but we can’t pay farmers enough to make them profitable because Walmart won’t pay us more for cheese.”

That’s creating this weird dynamic where processors actually benefit from low farmgate prices as long as they can maintain their retail contracts. It’s not some conspiracy—it’s just economics playing out in a way that hurts us at the farm level.

Looking Back: Why This Isn’t Like 2009 or 2015

The Dairy Apocalypse Timeline: 21,809 farms wiped out between 2017-2028, with the steepest decline coming in the next 3 years as milk prices crater below break-even

It’s worth looking at how we got here, because understanding the differences helps explain why the old recovery patterns won’t work this time…

2009 was actually pretty straightforward. Lehman Brothers collapsed, credit markets froze, and people stopped buying. Class III went from $20 to $9 in six months. But once the economy recovered, so did we. By 2011, we were setting price records again.

2015 was about oversupply. The EU eliminated quotas on March 31st after 31 years. European production jumped 6% almost overnight. Russia banned imports. China had too much inventory. But eventually producers cut back, China started buying again, and markets found their balance within 18 months.

This time? We’ve got five structural changes all hitting at once. The beef-on-dairy heifer shortage that’s locked in for years. China is becoming self-sufficient rather than our backstop. Technology is creating cost gaps that can’t be bridged. Fixed costs that prevent production cuts. And processors built for growth that isn’t happening. There’s no single fix because these aren’t temporary problems—they’re permanent changes to how the industry works.

Seven Leading Indicators That’ll Signal the Turn

If you want to know when this market really turns—and I mean actually turns, not just bounces around—here’s what I’m keeping an eye on:

Weekly dairy cow slaughter – USDA reports every Thursday
Looking for sustained rates 15-25% above year-ago levels for 8+ weeks. Currently running 5-8% below average. When slaughter spikes above 65,000 head weekly, that’s capitulation.

CME spot whey prices
Holding at 71-72¢ while cheese crashed from $2.20 to $1.70/lb. Breaking above 75¢ signals genuine demand recovery.

Cold storage inventories
October cheese shipments totaled 1.48 billion pounds, up 5.2% year-over-year. Need two consecutive months of meaningful drawdowns.

Export volumes
Need 8-12% year-over-year growth to signal international demand strength. Currently flat to slightly positive.

Heifer inventory reports
July 2026 USDA report will be critical—looking for the first stabilization since 2021.

Futures curve shape
Currently in contango. Shift to backwardation signals near-term tightness.

Chapter 12 bankruptcy rates
Up substantially in Q1 2025. Peak usual coincides with the market bottom.

Three Types of Operations Emerging from This

Based on what I’m seeing across the country—and USDA’s Census of Agriculture data backs this up—here’s how I think this shakes out by 2028:

The Big Operations Will Get Bigger

These operations with 5,000 to 25,000 cows aren’t just surviving—they’re actively expanding. I visited a 7,500-cow dairy near Amarillo recently that’s running all-in costs at $13.80/cwt. They’re buying herds from struggling neighbors at 60-70 cents on the dollar and integrating them pretty seamlessly.

With private equity backing and professional management teams—and look, I know how we all feel about that, but it’s the reality—these operations will probably control over half of US milk production within three years. They’re not the enemy; they’re just adapting to the economic reality we’re all facing.

Premium Niche Players Will Do Just Fine

The October Organic Dairy Market News shows organic certification still pays an $8-12/cwt premium over conventional. A friend of mine in Vermont—she’s got 95 cows, beautiful grass-fed operation—is getting $45-48/cwt selling directly to consumers through her on-farm store and a handful of local restaurants.

These operations compete on story and quality, not efficiency. If you’ve got the right location, marketing skills, and family commitment to make it work, this can be really successful. But let’s be realistic—it’s maybe 1,500 to 2,500 farms nationally that can pull this off.

I know a family in Pennsylvania—180 cows—who transitioned to organic three years ago. The husband told me over coffee last month: “We’re netting more on 180 organic than we ever did on 350 conventional. But man, those three transition years nearly broke us financially and emotionally, and my wife’s at farmers markets every Saturday and Wednesday year-round. It’s a complete lifestyle change.”

The Middle Is Really Struggling

This is hard to say, but if you’re running 500-1,500 cows producing commodity milk, the math is really challenging. Farm Credit’s benchmarking across multiple regions shows operations this size averaging $18-21/cwt in total costs. You’re $5-7 above the mega-dairies but can’t access the premiums that niche markets provide.

Between 2017 and 2022, USDA census data shows we lost 15,866 dairy farms while milk production increased by 5%. And honestly, that trend seems to be accelerating rather than slowing down.

Your Four-Number Reality Check

“We’ve got a $45 million plant running at 60% capacity. We need milk, but we can’t pay farmers enough to make them profitable because Walmart won’t pay us more for cheese.” – Wisconsin cheese plant manager

Look, I know nobody wants to do this kind of analysis when things are tough, but you really need to sit down—pour yourself a coffee—and work through these four calculations honestly:

1. Your True All-In Cost Per Hundredweight

Include everything—cash costs, debt service, family living draws, depreciation, and opportunity cost of your labor.

  • Under $16/cwt: You might make it work with expansion or efficiency gains
  • $16-18/cwt: You’re marginal—evaluate all options
  • $18-21/cwt: Need a transition plan within 12 months
  • Over $21/cwt: Everyday costs you equity

2. How Many Months of Runway Do You Have?

Available cash and credit divided by the monthly losses at $14 milk.

  • 6+ months: Time to be strategic
  • 3-6 months: Decide within 30 days
  • Under 3 months: Crisis mode—act immediately

3. What Would It Take to Get Competitive?

Investment required to reach $15/cwt divided by available capital.

  • Under 2.0: Expansion might work
  • 2.0-3.0: Pretty risky
  • Over 3.0: Expansion won’t save you

4. Could You Make a Niche Work?

Net premium after transition costs. The Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance shows $3-7/cwt additional cost during transition.

  • Premium covers 40%+: Strong pivot candidate
  • 25-40%: Possible with passion
  • Under 25%: Math doesn’t work

Your 90-Day Action Plan

Based on where you fall in those calculations:

If You’re a Survivor (costs under $17/cwt, 6+ months liquidity):
Lock in feed costs now. Get maximum Dairy Revenue Protection. Model expansion scenarios. Position for Q2 2026 asset opportunities.

If You’re Facing an Exit (costs $18-22/cwt, limited liquidity):
Consult an attorney confidentially. Get a professional appraisal. Gauge neighbor interest discreetly. Act before banks force decisions.

If You’re Considering a Niche (strong local market, family commitment):
Start organic certification now (36-month process). Test farmers markets. Run realistic equipment costs. Ensure family buy-in.

If You’re in Crisis (under 3 months liquidity):
Call an attorney today. Cull aggressively for cash. List sellable assets. Understand personal versus farm-only debt.

The Reality We’re Facing

What makes this downturn different is that all the traditional recovery mechanisms have changed. China’s not coming to rescue us from oversupply. The advantages of technology are growing, not shrinking. Fixed costs mean producers keep producing even when they’re losing money. And processing overcapacity creates all kinds of weird incentives that work against us.

The industry that emerges by 2028 will probably have 20,000 to 22,000 farms, down from about 26,000 today. Maybe 800 mega-dairies will produce 60% of our milk. Another 2,000 or so niche operations will serve premium markets. And the middle—those 500-1,500 cow operations that have been the backbone of dairy for generations—most of them will be gone.

If you’re in that middle tier, you’ve got maybe 90 days to make a strategic decision while you still have some control over the outcome. Calculate those four numbers. Be honest with yourself about what they tell you. Make your move.

Because by March, the producers who waited will wish they’d acted sooner. And I really don’t want you to be one of them. We’ve all worked too hard, sacrificed too much, to let this restructuring take everything from us.

Look, there’s still opportunity in this industry. But it’s going to look different than what most of us grew up with. Understanding that—and adapting to it while you still have options—that’s what’s going to separate those who thrive from those who just survive.

Stay strong, make smart decisions, and remember—there’s no shame in strategic change. There’s only shame in letting pride destroy what you’ve built.

Key Takeaways:

  • Your survival depends on four numbers: Calculate your true all-in cost/cwt, months of liquidity at $14 milk, investment needed to hit $15/cwt, and net premium from going niche—this week
  • The cost gap is unbridgeable: Mega-dairies operate at $13.80/cwt, small organic farms capture $45-48/cwt, but mid-size operations bleed cash at $18-21/cwt with no fix
  • Five permanent changes killed recovery: 72% beef-on-dairy locked through 2027, China down 30% on imports, tech ROI only at 2,000+ cows, fixed costs prevent production cuts, processors 40% overcapacity
  • 90 days to choose your path: Expand to 2,500+ cows, transition to premium niche, or execute strategic exit—after March, banks choose for you
  • 20,000 farms by 2028 (down from 26,000 today), but producers who act now can position themselves on the winning side

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , ,

Farm Income Soars to $180B in 2025 – But Not for Dairy

Tuesday, November 4th, 2025

Crop farmers: $35B bailout. Beef: $1,100 calves. You: $17.50 milk that costs $19 to make. The numbers that should anger every dairyman.

Executive Summary: Record farm income of $179.8 billion sounds great until you realize dairy’s been left behind—your neighbors got disaster checks while you’ve faced 18 months of negative margins with minimal help. The numbers are stark: mega-dairies produce $3-4/cwt cheaper, driving consolidation that’s eliminated 39% of farms since 2017. Behind every closure is a family burning through retirement savings, with 60-70% of dairy farmers now reporting serious mental health impacts. Yes, some operations thrive through creative adaptations—premium marketing in New York, specialty partnerships in Texas—but these require advantages most farms don’t have. For mid-size dairies, three paths remain: invest heavily to scale up, find niche markets, or exit strategically while equity remains. This article offers an honest assessment and practical tools to make that choice consciously rather than desperately.

dairy profitability strategies

You know what’s interesting? The September farm income forecast from USDA shows net farm income up 40.7% to $179.8 billion—second-highest on record. It’s all anyone’s talking about at the coffee shop. But here’s the thing: for most of us checking milk prices against feed bills this fall, that headline number feels like it’s from a different planet.

I was talking with a producer near Eau Claire last week—he’s milking about 380 Holsteins, and he’s been at it for years. While his grain-farming neighbor just deposited a disaster check for weather losses from two years back, this guy’s been navigating 18 months of tough margins with nothing but the DMC coverage he pays premiums for.

Makes you think about how these support structures really work across different commodities, doesn’t it?

Let me share what I’ve been learning from conversations around the industry—producers, economists, folks who’ve been watching these trends for decades. Maybe together we can make sense of this disconnect between ag’s overall prosperity and what’s happening in our barns.

Understanding Where That $180 Billion Really Goes

So here’s what’s fascinating when you dig into this $179.8 billion figure. About $41 billion of it? That’s government payments, not market returns.

The breakdown tells you everything:

  • $35.2 billion in disaster assistance through the American Relief Act—mostly for crop losses
  • $40 billion total in direct payments (we were at $10 billion just last year)
  • Minimal DMC payments for dairy—margins stayed just above that $9.50 trigger

You probably know this already, but it’s worth repeating: dairy’s support structure works completely differently. We pay into programs that rarely trigger at levels that actually help. Meanwhile, crop disasters get an immediate congressional response.

Now look, I’m not saying processors have it easy either. Labor’s up about 15%, energy costs have jumped over 20%, and don’t even get me started on packaging materials—nearly 20% higher than 2020. Everyone’s feeling it somehow. But the way support flows through the system…well, that’s another story.

The Scale Reality We Can’t Ignore in 2025

What I’ve found really compelling is the recent data from our land-grant universities on operational scale. And honestly, as much as we might not want to hear it, the numbers are clear: operations with 2,500-plus cows are producing milk for roughly $3 to $4 less per hundredweight than those of us running 300 to 500 head.

Let me break this down the way it was explained to me.

The Math Nobody Wants to Talk About

Take your typical 300-cow operation averaging 23,000 pounds:

  • Fixed costs: Running about $0.90 per hundredweight (varies by region, obviously)
  • Annual production: Around 6.9 million pounds
  • The challenge: Can’t justify specialized equipment, stuck with truckload purchasing

Compare that to 3,000 cows:

  • Fixed costs: Drop to maybe $0.45 per hundredweight
  • Annual production: 75 million pounds
  • The advantages: Railcar feed purchasing, specialized positions, equipment that actually makes sense
The cost gap isn’t closing—it’s widening. Mid-size operations at $19/cwt can’t compete with mega-dairies at $15/cwt. For a typical 300-cow farm producing 7 million pounds annually, this $4 difference translates to over $50,000 in lost competitiveness before debt service, labor, or family living expenses. 

An Idaho dairyman I know—he’s running about 2,800 head—put it to me straight:

“We’re buying feed in railcar quantities for substantially less per hundredweight. The guys buying truckloads? They’re paying $1.50 to $2 more, easy. That advantage is really tough to overcome.”

But here’s what’s worth considering. Not every big operation is printing money. I spoke with a California producer managing over 5,000 cows, and his perspective was sobering:

“Everyone thinks we have it made. Truth is, we’re all walking a tightrope, just at different heights. Our debt service alone runs over a million annually. One disease outbreak, one major equipment failure—those thin margins disappear real fast.”

The Census of Agriculture data from 2022 really drives this home: we lost 39% of dairy farms between 2017 and 2022. That’s the steepest five-year decline they’ve ever recorded. And operations over 1,000 cows? They’re now producing 66% of our milk, up from 57% in 2017.

834 Operations Control Half the Milk—16,334 Fight for Scraps

How This Plays Out Across the Country

What I find really interesting is how differently this consolidation hits different regions:

Pacific Northwest folks:

  • You’re dealing with that brutal Class I utilization problem—18% versus 29% nationally
  • Federal Order prices running over a dollar below the national average
  • And those transportation costs to get milk to cities? Forget about it

Wisconsin and Minnesota producers:

  • Over 500 farms gone in 2024 alone—mostly those 150-400 cow operations we all grew up around
  • When the co-op closes, the vet leaves, the equipment dealer stops stocking parts…
  • That infrastructure needs critical mass, and once it’s gone, it’s gone

Out in Idaho and Texas:

  • Production’s actually growing—7% or more—even as farm numbers drop
  • They’re attracting these mega-operations with the climate, the space
  • New processing plants are going up to match

Northeast—and this is tough:

  • Land at $4,500 an acre (if you can find it)
  • Environmental compliance costs that’d make your head spin
  • Infrastructure that’s 40 years older than what they’re building out West

California’s its own beast:

  • Central Valley operations are expanding like crazy
  • But near the cities? They’re selling to developers
  • Most complex market in the country, honestly

Florida dairy—different world:

  • Heat stress management costs running $100+ per cow annually
  • Unique fluid milk market dynamics
  • Some of the highest production costs nationally

Each region’s facing its own version of this challenge, but the underlying pressure’s the same everywhere.

The Human Side Nobody Wants to Talk About

Here’s what keeps me up at night. Recent agricultural health research suggests 60-70% of us are dealing with mental health impacts from farm stress. That’s way higher than the general population, and we need to acknowledge it.

I know a Wisconsin couple—good people, who milked registered Holsteins for nearly 30 years. Sold out this summer. They knew five years ago the math wasn’t working, but how do you walk away from something your grandfather built?

“The hardest part was watching our neighbors in grain and beef doing well while we struggled. Felt like nobody in policy circles even knew we existed.”

What makes dairy different—and we all know this:

  • No breaks: Cows need milking twice a day, every day
  • No sleep: Research shows we’re averaging four hours during calving season
  • No let-up: Financial pressure plus operational intensity equals chronic stress
  • Identity crisis: When the farm’s been in your family for generations…

By the time many folks finally make the decision, they’ve burned through the equity they’ll need for retirement. It’s heartbreaking.

But There Are Success Stories

Now, it’s not all doom and gloom. I’ve seen some really creative adaptations working.

That New York Operation Near Cooperstown

These folks transformed their 280-cow dairy:

  • What they did: Switched to A2A2 genetics, found a local processor, and added agritourism
  • Investment: About $450,000 over three years (yeah, it’s substantial)
  • Results: They’re seeing 18% net margins, getting $32/cwt equivalent
  • Key factor: They’re 45 minutes from Albany—location matters

Texas Partnership That Works

A 400-cow operation found their niche:

“It’s not revolutionary, but that $3 premium for high-butterfat milk makes the difference between losing money and modest profitability.”

  • Strategy: Partnered with a local ice cream manufacturer
  • Benefit: Guaranteed volume, premium for butterfat
  • Lesson: Sometimes the answer’s right in your backyard

Connecticut’s Organic Journey

This one’s honest about the challenges:

“The three-year transition nearly bankrupted us. But now? It’s sustainable rather than highly profitable, and sustainable beats losing money.”

  • Reality check: Needed off-farm income during transition
  • Current status: Making it work, but it’s not easy money
  • Truth: Location near affluent markets was crucial

Export Markets and Processing—It’s Complicated

USDA data shows we exported $8.2 billion in dairy products last year—second-highest ever. Sounds great, right? But here’s what worries me:

The vulnerabilities:

  • Over 40% of our cheese goes to Mexico
  • China’s substantially increased tariffs on most dairy products
  • Domestic consumption’s only growing 1-2% annually
  • We’re building processing capacity faster than finding markets

Recent expansions:

  • Wisconsin’s new plant: 8 million pounds daily
  • Valley Queen in South Dakota: Another 3 million pounds of capacity
  • And there’s more coming online

The Federal Order reforms this summer increased make allowances by about $0.54 per hundredweight. Processors show the data—costs really are up. But we’re all wondering how they’re expanding if margins are so tight. Both things can be true, I guess.

Alternative Models—Let’s Be Realistic

You know, everyone asks about organic, grass-fed, on-farm processing. Here’s my honest take after watching this for years: these can work brilliantly for maybe 20-25% of producers. But you need:

The right location:

  • Within 50 miles of a big city (500,000+ people)
  • Household incomes above average
  • Customers who value what you’re doing

The right scale:

  • 80-200 cows typically
  • Small enough for relationships
  • Big enough for efficiency

The right mindset:

  • Ready for 80+ hour weeks
  • Willing to do marketing, not just milking
  • Often need off-farm income initially

Burlington, Vermont? Perfect. Middle of Nebraska? Much tougher.

Technology Might Actually Help in 2025

What’s encouraging is how technology costs have come down. Genomic testing costs have dropped substantially in recent years. Activity monitoring that used to need 5,000 cows still need to be justified. Now it works at 500.

A Pennsylvania producer with 450 cows told me:

“Our conception rates improved 8%, we’re catching health issues two days earlier, and I’m actually sleeping through the night during calving. The investment was about $120,000, and we figured an 18-month payback.”

And here’s something interesting—robotic milking is finally penciling out for mid-size operations. We’re seeing 200-300 cow dairies making it work, especially where labor’s tight. About 5% of operations are exploring this now, up from almost none five years ago. It won’t overcome all the scale disadvantages, but it’s helping mid-size operations stay competitive in specific areas. That’s something, at least.

The Policy Reality in 2025

Here’s what’s uncomfortable but true: dairy doesn’t fit the disaster model Congress understands.

Recent support comparison says it all:

  • Crops: $35.2 billion in disaster aid
  • Commodity payments: Tripled from last year
  • Conservation: Up over 10%
  • Dairy: DMC that we pay for rarely helps when we need it

When crops fail due to weather, it’s visible and immediate. When will our margins compress over two years? That looks like a business problem, not a disaster. And as fewer dairy farms open each year, our political voice keeps getting quieter.

Crops: $35 Billion. Dairy: $1.2 Billion. The Support Gap Killing Farms.

What’s Actually Working Right Now

Looking at successful operations, here’s what they’re doing:

Getting real about costs:

  • Calculating true production costs, including economic depreciation
  • Need about $2/cwt margin above true costs
  • Most of us are below that right now

Using every tool available:

  • DMC five-year commitment saves 25% on premiums
  • Dairy Revenue Protection for catastrophic protection
  • Strategic culling with cull prices at $140-148/cwt

One Minnesota producer shared this:

“We culled 20% strategically—generated enough cash to restructure debt and buy some breathing room.”

Having an exit strategy (even if you never use it): Financial advisors tell me farmers with exit plans actually make better daily decisions. Takes the desperation out of it.

Looking Down the Road

Based on what economists and industry folks are saying, here’s what’s likely:

Industry projections for 2025-2030 suggest:

  • We’ll lose 2,000-2,800 farms annually through 2027
  • Operations over 1,000 cows will hit 75% of production by 2030
  • Mid-size farms are mostly gone except near cities

Policy changes?

  • Farm Bill might tweak things
  • But fundamental change? Unlikely
  • Maybe higher DMC coverage, but same structure

Market disruptions could change everything—disease, processing problems. But you can’t plan on disasters.

So What Does This Mean for Your Farm?

Let’s get practical here.

First, know where you really stand:

  • Calculate actual costs versus realistic revenue
  • Penn State’s got great worksheets online for this
  • If the math doesn’t work, that’s not failure—it’s information

Second, pick a lane:

  • Staying in? Either differentiate clearly or scale up
  • Getting out? Timing is everything for preserving equity
  • Standing still? Usually means falling behind

Third, get support:

  • Farm Aid: 1-800-FARM-AID for financial counseling
  • Crisis line: 988 if you’re struggling
  • Talk to other producers—we’re all dealing with this

Every month you operate at a loss, eats equity you’ll need later. That’s just math.

The Bottom Line

Look, this disconnect between headlines and our reality reflects changes that aren’t reversing. Consolidation, technology, global markets—these forces are bigger than any of us.

But here’s what I want to emphasize: you still have choices.

If you’re well-positioned—good location, right scale, unique advantages—this transition might create opportunities. If not, you need clear-eyed assessment and strategic planning.

Success isn’t about being the best farmer or working the hardest anymore. It’s about recognizing reality early and adapting. Sometimes that’s expanding. Sometimes it’s finding a niche. And sometimes—more often than we’d like—it’s transitioning out with dignity and security intact.

Make decisions consciously, not by default. Understand where you really stand instead of hoping for rescue. That might be the most valuable thing any of us can do right now.

We’re all trying to navigate these changes while holding onto why we got into dairy in the first place. The conversations I’ve had across the country show we’re facing similar challenges, just in different ways.

And whatever path makes sense for your operation, you’re not walking it alone. We’re all figuring this out together.

Key Takeaways:

  • The economics are permanent: Mega-dairies produce $3-4/cwt cheaper—this gap will widen, not shrink, making commodity milk unviable for farms under 1,000 cows
  • Your three options are clear: Scale to 1,200+ cows (requires $3-5M capital), capture premium markets (needs metro proximity), or exit strategically while equity remains
  • Time is your enemy: Every month at negative margins burns $25-50K in equity—the difference between comfortable retirement and bankruptcy is acting 12-18 months sooner
  • Location determines everything: Success stories share one trait—proximity to wealthy consumers or unique partnerships; without this, scaling or exiting are your only choices
  • Support exists, use it: Calculate true costs with Penn State worksheets, get financial counseling at 1-800-FARM-AID, mental health support at 988—deciding consciously beats drowning slowly

Mental Health Resources: National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (988, available 24/7), Farm Aid Hotline (1-800-FARM-AID), American Farm Bureau’s Farm State of Mind resources

Financial Resources: Farm Service Agency offices, Farm Credit Services, state Farm Business Management programs, National Farm Transition Network

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , ,

October 20 Global Dairy Report: $17 Milk Everywhere Except This Wisconsin Farm Getting $28

Monday, October 20th, 2025

Why are 14 Wisconsin farms capturing $6,000 extra annually from a group text? The answer changes everything.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: We’ve uncovered something that challenges everything you’ve heard about dairy consolidation: Wisconsin farms under 200 cows are capturing $4-6 more per hundredweight than their 2,000-cow neighbors through component optimization, direct marketing, and collaborative networks. Penn State Extension’s latest data confirms farms pushing protein above 3.5% are banking an extra $5,110 annually on just 200 cows—that’s a 4.5:1 return on feed investment. With European butter crashing to €5,820/MT (down 26% year-over-year) and China cutting imports despite their 2.8% production decline, we’re witnessing the biggest market disruption since 2009. But here’s what matters: Central region processing plants running at 95-98% capacity through Q2 2026 means those who adapt now will capture the market share from the projected 2,800 farm exits this year. Cornell’s data shows milk solids production up 1.65% despite declining cow numbers—efficiency alone won’t save you, but strategic pivoting will. The farms thriving at $17 milk aren’t waiting for recovery; they’re creating their own markets, and we’ll show you exactly how.

Monday morning, 6 AM. Coffee’s hot, but the numbers are cold.

European butter prices have plummeted to €5,820 per metric ton—down 26% from last year. Got a text from a buddy milking 180 Holsteins outside Eau Claire: “Can’t make the math work anymore. Not at these prices.”

But here’s where it gets weird…

Ten miles down the road from him, another 180-cow operation is having their best year since 2015. Same milk price. Same feed costs. Guy’s actually thinking about buying another robot. Posted pictures of his new Ram 3500 on Facebook last week.

What the hell’s going on?

Small farms are crushing it—capturing a $4-6/cwt premium over the big herds. This chart lets you SEE why the future favors the bold, not the biggest.

REGIONAL BREAKEVEN REALITY CHECK

RegionBreakeven Price ($/cwt)Main ChallengeCompetitive Edge
Northeast$20-22Trucked grainLong-term stability
Upper Midwest$18.50-19.50Local cornNetworked knowledge
Southeast$21-23Heat stressAlternative revenue
California$19-21Water costMarket access

Northeast: $20-22/cwt (trucked grain, 1970s tie-stalls)
Upper Midwest: $18.50-19.50/cwt (local corn helps)
Southeast: $21-23/cwt (heat stress kills everything)
California: $19-21/cwt (water ain’t free) Your Farm: $_____?

The October Numbers That Matter (Spoiler: They’re All Bad)

Let me paint you the picture: Class III is bouncing between $16.50 and $ 17.00/cwt, while your breakeven’s probably north of $19. Maybe $20 if you’re honest about that new loader payment.

The Europeans? They’re drowning in milk. French production jumped 4% year-over-year. Germans added 2.1%. The entire EU bloc produced 13.75 million tonnes in August—up 3.3%. Their reward? That €5,820 butter price that keeps sliding like a fresh cow on ice.

Meanwhile, the USDA’s September outlook indicates that we are heading for 230 billion pounds in 2025. Another 231.3 billion forecast for 2026. More milk into markets, such as China.

The thing about China—and nobody at World Dairy Expo wanted to say this out loud—they’re done buying. Down 2.8% in domestic production, sure, but they’re cutting imports anyway. Why? Because over 90% of Chinese dairy farms are hemorrhaging money. They’d rather have empty shelves than lose more cash buying our powder.

That growth story we built our entire export strategy around? It’s not coming back. And if you’re waiting for it to, you might want to update your resume.

Small Farms Are Beating Big Dairies (No, Really)

This is gonna sting for some of you, but those small farms everyone said would die? Some of them figured out what the 2,000-cow operations missed.

Penn State Extension’s Virginia Ishler and her team have been tracking this. Farms under 200 cows doing direct marketing or adding value on-farm? They’re capturing $4 to $ 6 more per hundredweight. That’s not a rounding error. That’s the difference between bankruptcy court and buying that neighbor’s 40 acres when he quits.

“I started bottling 20% of my production in June. Same milk that would’ve gotten me $17 at the co-op, I’m getting the equivalent of $28 on the bottled stuff. Yeah, there’s more work. Yeah, I’m tired. But tired beats broke.”
— Vermont producer, 165 cows

What really strikes me about Wisconsin is how fast this shift is happening. Brody Stapel at Double Dutch Dairy near Cedar Grove—you might know him, as he sells at the Sheboygan Farmers Market—started bottling in May. Non-homogenized, low-temp pasteurized, glass bottles. It turns out that lactose-intolerant individuals can actually drink it. He now has home delivery routes, featuring the Farm Stapels brand, in three Piggly Wigglys.

Still ships 95% to Sargento. But that 5% bottled? That’s where his profit lives.

Success Metric: Of the 14 Wisconsin farms in that information network, 12 are expanding operations while the state average is contracting. That’s not luck—that’s strategy.

Three Things That Actually Work (With Real Numbers, Not BS)

Every tenth of a percent matters. Jumping from 3.29% to 3.70% protein can mean an extra $9,000 for a 200-cow operation.

1. The Component Game (AKA Your Only Lever)

Forget the noise for a minute. The national average is 4.23% butterfat and 3.29% protein. But here’s what matters—farms pushing protein above 3.5% are banking on that 10-cent premium. Every. Single. Shipment.

COMPONENT PREMIUM REALITY (October 2025)

Butterfat: 4.23% average = Base price
Protein: 3.29% average = Base price
Protein: 3.50% achieved = +$0.10/cwt premium
Protein: 3.70% achieved = +$0.18/cwt premium Your Components: ___% fat % protein = $ premium?

Here’s the Math Nobody Shows You:

200-cow dairy pushing protein from 3.29% to 3.50%:

  • Daily production: 14,000 lbs (70 lbs/cow average)
  • Premium captured: $0.10/cwt
  • Annual premium: $5,110
  • Feed cost increase: ~$1,500
  • NET GAIN: $3,610

That’s your property tax. Or three months of health insurance. Or that used feed mixer you’ve been eyeing on Craigslist.

Wisconsin’s MILK2024 program breaks it down even further. Every 0.1% protein increase? Worth $8,000-10,000 annually on a 200-cow dairy. That 180-cow farm in Eau Claire? They’re projecting $18,000 additional revenue this year from protein optimization alone.

Feed cost to achieve it? Maybe $4,000 if they’re buying bypass protein. That’s a 4.5:1 return. Show me another investment doing that right now.

2. The $6,000 Group Text (Information Arbitrage)

Here’s something the old-timers absolutely hate but works. Fourteen producers in central Wisconsin formed a text group. Not a co-op, not an LLC, just a group text.

Tuesday morning: “Agropur taking spot loads at $17.50” Wednesday: “Land O’Lakes needs high-protein, paying premium” Thursday: “Ellsworth cheese plant basis shifted, avoid”

They’re each capturing $4,000-$ 6,000 annually just by knowing where to ship when. One guy ships to three different plants in a week sometimes. His dad would’ve called that crazy. His banker calls it smart.

“We’re not competing anymore,” one told me over Spotted Cow at the Legion hall. “We’re surviving together. Competition’s a luxury we can’t afford.”

3. Revenue Stacking (The Small Farm Secret Weapon)

Research from Kansas State confirmed what I’m seeing everywhere: farms with fewer than 300 cows can pivot faster than larger operations. They’re not more efficient. They’re more flexible.

Real examples from this month:

Pennsylvania, 150 cows: Added agritourism. Corn maze, birthday parties, and “pet a calf” experiences. Bringing in $85,000 annually. That’s $567 per cow, which has nothing to do with milk prices. Their bank loves them now.

Minnesota, 225 cows: Solar panels on the barn and that back 40 that floods every spring anyway. Twenty-year lease at $1,200/acre/year. Better than growing $4.50 corn on ground that might flood.

Wisconsin, 175 cows: Custom raising heifers for the 3,000-cow dairy down the road. Gets $2.75/head/day. Better margins than milk. No market risk—the big farm owns the heifers.

Iowa, 190 cows: Went seasonal. Dry everyone off from December through February. Match spring flush to fluid premiums. Capturing $1.50/cwt more April-August. Cows are healthier. He’s definitely healthier.

The Processing Disaster Nobody’s Discussing

Forget survival mode—these proven pivots have Wisconsin’s small dairies stacking cash and market opportunities, even as bigger neighbors go under

Leonard Polzin from UW-Madison laid out the truth at January’s Ag Forum, and it’s worse than you think. That “$11 billion in new processing capacity” everyone’s talking about? Most won’t be operational until Q2 2026. Some won’t happen at all if milk stays at $17.

Central region plants running at 95-98% capacity isn’t temporary. It’s your reality through next summer at a minimum. Wisconsin co-ops have already sent the letters—base excess penalties take effect on November 1.

One co-op (you know which one) is implementing tiered pricing:

  • Base production: $17.00/cwt
  • 101-110% of base: $14.50/cwt
  • Over 110%: $13.00/cwt

Minnesota’s actually worse. A producer near Winona told me that anything over 105% of base gets $13.00. Thirteen dollars! That’s 1995 prices with 2025 costs.

What happened at Hastings Creamery should terrify everyone. Processing 150,000 pounds daily until the discharge permit is issued. Farmers had milk, but the plant couldn’t take it. Lucas Sjostrom from Minnesota Milk confirmed they were “voluntarily dumping milk on-farm.”

That’s not oversupply. That’s infrastructure collapse.

Your Feed Market Reality (It Gets Worse)

Current markets, if you’re buying this week:

  • December corn: $4.45-4.65/bu (my neighbor who grows corn says $5 by January)
  • Soybean meal: $285/ton and climbing
  • Quality hay: Good luck finding any under $280/ton

Talked to a nutritionist who manages 15,000 cows across Wisconsin. His take? “We’re looking at $5 corn by February if South America has any weather issues. These guys buying hand-to-mouth are gonna get crushed.”

Your feed costs are rising while the milk price is falling. That’s not a squeeze—that’s a vice.

THE REAL BOTTOM LINE

Waiting for $20 milk is like waiting for your ex to apologize.
It might happen, but you’ll probably die first.
Finding ways to make $17 work? That’s survival.

What Winners Do Different (Hint: Everything)

Spent the last month analyzing farms under 300 cows that are actually thriving. Not surviving—thriving. Banking money. Taking vacations. Sleeping at night.

Three patterns kept showing up:

Ruthless Efficiency: Successful 150-cow farms run 65-70 cows per worker, same as mega-dairies. Automated gates, crowd control gates, and possibly even a robot. One guy near Dodgeville milks 150 cows faster than his dad milked 50. “We work smarter, not harder. Had to—can’t afford hired help at $20/hour.”

Revenue Stacking: Wisconsin farm that blew my mind—milk revenue, plus beef-on-dairy ($900 per calf right now), plus custom heifer raising ($2.75/day), plus solar lease ($1,200/acre), plus direct butter sales to three Madison restaurants ($8/lb). Five revenue streams. Same 180 cows. Same land. Same family.

Collaboration Without Consolidation: Five 200-cow farms in Dodge County formed an LLC—but just for buying feed. They’re getting loads at 1,000-cow pricing but keeping independence. Another group shares a nutritionist, vet, and relief milkers. “We compete Tuesday, cooperate Wednesday,” as one put it.

The Uncomfortable Math on Consolidation

Let’s talk real numbers. Wisconsin lost 455 farms last year. Ninety-four in October alone. The state’s own survey revealed that 17% of all dairy farms plan to exit within five years. Farms under 100 cows? Twenty-two percent say they’re done.

Those aren’t statistics. Those are your neighbors.

But here’s the weird part—Cornell data shows milk solids production up 1.65% year-to-date despite fewer cows. We’re getting more efficient at producing milk nobody wants. It’s like running faster toward a cliff.

Industry consolidation data indicate that farms with between 150 and 400 cows have the highest costs and the lowest returns. Too big for small-farm premiums, too small for commodity efficiency. That’s the kill zone.

Your Next 90 Days (The Only Timeline That Matters)

Week 1-2: Face Reality, Get brutal about costs. Penn State’s got worksheets. Cornell’s got spreadsheets. If you don’t know your breakeven to the penny—not the hundredweight, the actual penny—you’re not farming, you’re gambling.

Week 3-4: Component Focus Check your last three months of component tests. Calculate what 0.1% more protein means for your check. The Center for Dairy Excellence ECM calculator shows exactly this. That 180-cow farm pushing protein? They check tests like day traders check stocks.

Week 5-8: Find Your Stack. What else can your farm do? Direct sales? Custom work? Solar? Agritourism? Beef-on-dairy? Pick one. Start small. Test it.

Week 9-12: Make The Choice. Get creative or get out. Harsh? Yeah. True? Also yeah.

The farms that do the same thing in the same way are the ones getting auction flyers printed. The ones trying something—anything—different are the ones buying at those auctions.

The Decision That Can’t Wait

Met a 73-year-old dairyman in Marathon County last month. Just installed robots. At 73. Asked him why.

“Because standing still means dying, and I’m not ready for either.”

Markets don’t care about your grandfather’s legacy. Don’t care how many generations your family’s been milking. They care about supply, demand, and who produces the cheapest.

European futures signal more pain coming. GDT auctions confirm it—WMP at $3,650 and sliding. The Wisconsin harvest basis shows the whole rural economy’s stressed. When grain farmers hurt, equipment dealers hurt, banks tighten, and credit disappears.

The 2,800 farms are expected to exit this year? That’s market share for somebody. Question is whether you’re capturing it or becoming it.

Your Choice (And Yeah, You Have to Choose)

Your October check is what it is. November’s definitely worse. December… let’s not even go there.

But what you do today—literally today, Monday, October 20—determines whether you’re buying your neighbor’s cows next spring or selling yours.

That thriving 180-cow farm down the road? They made tough choices two years ago when they still had options to consider. The bottling equipment, component optimization, and direct sales routes—none of it happened overnight. They saw this coming and adapted early.

They chose to change when changing was optional.

Now it’s mandatory.

What’s your choice?

Because doing nothing? In this market, that’s choosing to fail. And failure’s got a really high acceptance rate right now.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Component Premiums = Immediate ROI: Push protein from 3.29% to 3.50% and capture $8,000-10,000 annually per 200 cows. Wisconsin’s MILK2024 calculator shows feed cost increases of $1,500-2,000, yielding returns of $5,110+. Start Monday by reviewing your last three months of component tests and calculating potential gains.
  • Information Networks Beat Individual Guessing: Fourteen Wisconsin producers sharing real-time spot prices and processor needs via group text are each banking $4,000-6,000 extra annually. Create or join a trusted network this week—Tuesday’s spot load at $17.50 beats Wednesday’s regular haul at $17.00.
  • Revenue Stacking Under 300 Cows: Small farms adding just one alternative revenue stream (agritourism: $85,000/year, custom heifer raising: $2.75/head/day, solar: $1,200/acre) are achieving better margins than pure milk production. Pick one complementary enterprise that fits your land and labor—test it small, scale if profitable.
  • Direct Marketing Captures Hidden Premiums: Bottling just 5-20% of production for local sales can yield $28/cwt equivalent versus $17 commodity price. Center for Dairy Excellence worksheets show breakeven at 800 gallons/week for most operations. Glass bottles, non-homogenized, farmers markets—that’s where the margin lives.
  • Processing Capacity Crisis = Pricing Opportunity: With plants at 95-98% capacity and tiered pricing hitting ($17 base, $14.50 over-base), strategic production management beats volume chasing. Match your flush to processor needs, not calendar tradition—April-August fluid premiums can add $1.50/cwt for seasonal producers.

Data Sources & References

Market data compiled from EU Commission Milk Market Observatory, USDA reports (pre-shutdown), Penn State Extension, Cornell PRO-DAIRY, UW-Madison Dairy Markets, Kansas State University research, and the Center for Dairy Excellence. Market prices reflect mid-October 2025 conditions. Additional reporting from regional cooperatives, the Minnesota Milk Producers Association, and producer networks.

Component Optimization Tools:

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

The $8.2 Billion Export Paradox: Your 3-Path Playbook for $16 Milk

Sunday, October 19th, 2025

Why does record demand mean less money? The answer changes everything about your operation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: What farmers are discovering right now is that record dairy exports—$8.2 billion in 2024 according to USDA—aren’t translating to profitable milk checks, with Class III futures stuck between $16-17 per hundredweight. The University of Wisconsin’s analysis shows the June 2025 Federal Order changes shifted about 52 cents per hundredweight from farmers to processors through increased make allowances, costing a typical 750-cow operation $75,000-$80,000 annually. Meanwhile, Cornell Pro-Dairy research reveals that operations finding success are those capturing $2-4 premiums through quality differentiation or investing in value-added processing that returns $40-60 per hundredweight. With 67% of dairy farms meeting financial stress criteria according to Farm Credit’s Q3 report, and FSA forbearance ending December 31st, the window for strategic repositioning is narrowing. Yet regional opportunities remain strong—from Wisconsin’s specialty cheese premiums to sustainability payments of $8-12 per hundredweight from major food companies. The path forward isn’t about waiting for markets to recover… it’s about choosing your lane now: scale efficiency, premium capture, or value-added processing.

dairy farm profitability

You know that disconnect we’re all feeling at co-op meetings? Export announcements sound fantastic—USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service reported $8.25 billion in dairy exports for 2024, second-highest on record. Mexico alone bought $2.47 billion worth of our products.

And yet… here we sit with Class III futures trading between $16 and $17 per hundredweight for November delivery on the CME.

Something’s not adding up, right? Looking at this data might change how you think about your operation’s future.

U.S. dairy exports remain strong at $8.2-8.4 billion, yet Class III futures languish between $16-17/cwt—a disconnect that reveals how record demand doesn’t automatically translate to profitable milk checks. The 2022 peak of $9.5B in exports coincided with $21.63/cwt pricing, but that relationship has broken down

Why Processing Margins Tell the Real Story

DateEventImpactUrgencyMonths Until
June 1, 2025New FMMO Rules EffectiveMake allowances increased 85-92¢/cwtActive-4.0
Current (Oct 2025)67% Farms in Financial StressFarm Credit Q3 2025 report thresholdCurrent State0.0
Dec 31, 2025FSA Forbearance ExpiresPayment deadlines hit stressed operationsCritical2.5
Jan 1, 2026New USMCA ProvisionsBorder trade rules shiftHigh3.0
Q1 2026Debt Restructuring Wave$146.3B ag debt needs restructuringCritical3.0

So here’s what’s interesting about the June 2025 Federal Milk Marketing Order adjustments. When the Federal Register published the AMS final rule this past June, they bumped up make allowances—$0.2519 per pound for cheese, $0.2272 for butter, and $0.2393 for nonfat dry milk.

The University of Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Profitability calculated that works out to about 52 cents less per hundredweight in our pockets. Here’s how: Higher make allowances mean lower component prices in the FMMO formulas. When processors are credited with higher manufacturing costs, the regulated minimum price paid to farmers drops proportionally. For a 750-cow operation? That’s $75,000 to $80,000 less annually.

Processing plants operate 30-40% below USDA-assumed costs, capturing millions while farmer milk checks shrink by $75,000-$80,000 annually for a typical 750-cow operation. The June 2025 Federal Order changes made this gap even wider

What farmers are finding is that modern cheese plants—especially those running three shifts—operate way below those make allowances. We’re talking 30 to 40 percent below what USDA assumes they need.

Think about it. Processors buy milk at June’s $18 Class III price, turn it into 10 pounds of cheese plus whey. CME cheese at $1.80 per pound plus dry whey at 50 cents (according to Dairy Market News) brings in about $18.50 gross. The margin between actual costs and make allowances? Well, you can see where that goes.

How China’s Trade Shift Changed Everything

Market Access FactorUnited StatesNew Zealand
Tariff Rate to China10% base (125% peak tariff)0% (duty-free since Jan 2024)
Dairy Export Value 2024$584M (down from $2.47B total exports)Dominates 46% China imports
China Market ShareDeclining rapidly46% and growing
Trade Agreement StatusNone with ChinaFTA since 2008, upgraded 2024
Government Subsidy EdgeLimitedHeavy support
Cost Advantage per TonBaseline+$350M advantage

Looking back at July 2018, China slapped those 125% retaliatory tariffs on our dairy—documented in the U.S. Trade Representative’s Section 301 schedules. NASS data shows farmgate prices dropped $4 per hundredweight within months.

But China didn’t stop buying dairy. They just stopped buying ours.

New Zealand’s Ministry for Primary Industries now reports supplying 46% of China’s dairy imports, duty-free since January 2024. Rabobank calculates that’s about $350 million in advantages their farmers get that we don’t.

During 2018-2020, while farms bled red ink, SEC filings show the processing sector announced $8 billion in expansions. DFA alone opened an $85 million Nevada facility and bought 44 Dean Foods plants for $433 million when Dean went bankrupt. Interesting timing.

Technology ROI: Why Your Scale Matters More Than Ever

What I’ve noticed, talking with producers, is how technology hits different scales differently. Robotic milking runs $150,000 to $200,000 per stall according to manufacturer pricing. A 120-cow robot barn? That’s $1.5 to $2 million.

Large operations spread those costs. Small farms might save enough on labor to justify it. But that 500 to 1,500 cow middle? Too big for family labor, too small for real economies of scale.

Cornell’s Pro-Dairy documented precision feeding systems saving 50 cents to a dollar per hundredweight. On 15 million pounds, that’s $75,000 to $150,000 saved. But implementation costs $50,000 to $100,000. Again, scale determines everything.

Premium Milk Markets: What’s Actually Working

Despite challenges, Wisconsin’s Milk Marketing Board documents mid-size operations—500 to 1,000 cows—capturing real premiums through quality and components.

What works? Focus. Some hit somatic cell counts consistently below 100,000. Others boost protein by 0.15 to 0.20 percentage points. Extension case studies show investments of $50,000 to $150,000 in cooling or feed management can generate $150,000 to $300,000 annual returns for positioned operations.

Regional specialty cheese makers often pay $2 to $4 premiums for milk meeting exact specifications. It’s not a radical transformation—it’s targeted improvements aligned with specific opportunities.

While some U.S. farms find success carving out these niche markets, it’s worth examining how our neighbors to the north approach dairy economics entirely differently.

Canada’s System: A Different World

Statistics Canada’s 2024 Farm Financial Survey shows Canadian dairy farmers averaging $246,264 in net income. Bankruptcies? So rare that they don’t track them separately.

Their supply management matches production to demand and sets prices based on Canadian Dairy Commission cost calculations. Yeah, farmers pay $30,000 per cow in quota. Nielsen Canada shows consumers pay 15-20% more for dairy. Trade-offs.

But Farm Credit Canada lends 70-80% against quota value because cash flow’s predictable. That’s different from U.S. dairy, where every loan feels like venture capital.

Whether we’d want their system is debatable, but understanding different approaches helps us evaluate our own opportunities—including those critical dates fast approaching.

Critical 2026 Dates You Need to Know

Financial pressure on dairy farms has returned to crisis levels, with 67% meeting stress indicators in Q3 2025—matching the worst periods since 2019. The brief recovery of 2021-2022 proved temporary, and with FSA forbearance ending December 31st, many operations face critical decisions in the next 60 days

With Fed rates at 4.25-4.50% (per the July FOMC minutes) and the Kansas City Fed showing ag loans over 7.25%, expansion math changed completely. A $3 million project costs an extra $112,500 annually versus 2021 rates.

Farm Credit’s Q3 2025 report shows 67% of dairy operations meeting financial stress indicators. Many rely on FSA forbearance expiring December 31st.

Mark these dates:

  • December 31, 2025: FSA forbearance expires
  • January 1, 2026: New USMCA dairy provisions affect border operations
  • Q1 2026: Congressional Research Service projects $146.3 billion ag debt needs restructuring

Beyond managing immediate financial pressures, forward-thinking operations are exploring new revenue streams through sustainability and value-added production.

Sustainability Premiums and Value-Added Options

StrategyFarm Size (Cows)Investment RequiredAdditional Revenue per CowAnnual Payback (750-cow equivalent)Risk LevelTimeline to Profitability
Small Farm Value-Added<200$400K-$600K+$40-60/cwt$300K-$450KHigh18-24 months
Mid-Size Premium Quality500-1,000$50K-$150K+$2-4/cwt premium$150K-$300KMedium6-12 months
Large-Scale Efficiency2,000+$2M+Sub-$14/cwt cost$750K+ savingsMedium-High3-5 years

General Mills’ 2025 sustainability report details $8-12 premiums for regenerative practices. NRCS estimates managed grazing costs $20,000-$40,000 in fencing and water. Cover crops run $50-$150 per acre.

USDA’s Value-Added Producer Grant database shows cheese operations needing $400,000-$600,000 in equipment. Takes 18-24 months to profitability, but returns often hit $40-60 per hundredweight, double to triple commodity prices.

The Organic Trade Association reports organic premiums at $8-10. Even without certification, documenting sustainable practices opens doors with major food companies.

Global Trade: Why We’re Losing Ground

The European Commission’s September 2025 report shows EU exports to Southeast Asia up 34%. U.S. exports there dropped 12% (USDA FAS). Why? EU-Vietnam eliminated dairy tariffs. We still pay 10-20%.

Australia captured 18% of Japan’s cheese imports (up from 11%) despite drought, according to Japanese customs data. Their trade agreement provides access we lack.

Plant-based competition? The Plant Based Foods Association reports $2.6 billion in 2024 U.S. retail sales. That’s our former market share.

These global dynamics play out differently across U.S. regions, each facing unique challenges and opportunities.

Regional Realities Shape Your Options

RegionFluid Milk Premium ($/cwt)Cheese Plant DensityWater Cost ChallengeHeat Stress ImpactKey Opportunity
Northeast3.5MediumLowLowFluid premiums
Southeast4.0LowLowHigh ($150-200/cow)Population growth
Upper Midwest0.5Very High (600+)LowLowCheese premiums
California1.0HighHigh ($400/acre-ft)MediumYear-round production
Southwest2.0MediumMediumHighExpanding fluid market

California gets year-round production but faces $400 per acre-foot water costs (California Department of Water Resources). Northeast captures $2-5 fluid premiums (Federal Order data) but manages 30% seasonal swings.

Wisconsin’s 600-plus cheese plants (per the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association) mean opportunity and competition. Southwest sees expansion with volatile feed costs. Southeast? University of Georgia shows heat stress costs $150-200 per cow, but growing populations drive fluid premiums up. And Florida’s unique challenges—humidity, hurricanes, and limited local feed—create both obstacles and opportunities for those who adapt.

What works in Idaho won’t work in Vermont. Know your context.

Next Generation’s Challenge

USDA’s Beginning Farmer program shows new dairy farmers need $2-3 million in capital. At current rates, that’s $175,000-$260,000 debt service before operating.

Creative solutions emerge. Share-milking lets young farmers manage facilities for milk check percentage—entry without massive capital. The National Young Farmers Coalition documents successful transitions through these models, including beef-on-dairy programs requiring less capital.

Making Your Numbers Work

Calculate true costs, including family labor. Cornell’s Dairy Farm Business Summary has free worksheets. FSA’s Dairy Margin Coverage shows a national average at $21.67 per hundredweight. Below that? You’re converting equity to cash.

Look beyond traditional buyers. Federal Order data shows premium spreads exceeding $3 per hundredweight between buyers. On 5 million pounds, $2 difference equals $100,000.

Land Grant research consistently shows two models working: small with value-added ($800+ additional per cow) or large, achieving sub-$14 production costs. That 500-1,500 cow middle needs strategic positioning—quality premiums, components, or niche markets.

The Farm Financial Standards Council shows operations with 15-20% revenue in working capital survive downturns better. Liquidity might matter more than efficiency right now.

The Path Forward: Three Critical Questions

The disconnect between record exports and struggling farms reflects structural market evolution. This isn’t a cycle that patience fixes.

After digesting all this, here are the three strategic questions every operation should be asking:

1. What’s your true breakeven? Not what you hope it is, but what it actually is, including family labor, management time, and equity cost. If you don’t know this number precisely, that’s job one.

2. Where can you capture premium value? Whether through quality, components, sustainability, processing, or scale—identify your most realistic path to differentiation. Generic commodity milk at minimum prices isn’t sustainable for most operations.

3. How much runway do you have? With FSA forbearance ending and refinancing getting tougher, know exactly how many months you can operate at current margins. This determines whether you have time for gradual adjustment or need dramatic change.

Operations across all scales are finding profitable paths. Small farms through processing. Mid-size through quality differentiation. Large through efficiency we couldn’t imagine before.

The dairy industry always rewarded adaptation. Today, it demands it more than ever. But genuine opportunities exist for those positioned right. Whether through technology, premiums, scale, or value-added—the paths are there.

Choose the path fitting your operation, family, and future. This industry will keep evolving. Our job is evolving with it—thoughtfully, strategically, profitably. And remember, we’ve weathered tough times before. We’ll weather these too, just differently than we expected.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Premium markets deliver real returns: Operations achieving sub-100,000 somatic cell counts or boosting protein 0.15-0.20 percentage points capture $2-4/cwt premiums—that’s $150,000-$300,000 annually on 7.5 million pounds, with investments typically running $50,000-$150,000
  • Technology ROI depends entirely on your scale: Robotic milking ($150,000-$200,000 per stall) works for large operations spreading costs or small farms saving labor, but that 500-1,500 cow middle range struggles to justify the math
  • Three proven paths exist for different scales: Small operations with value-added processing generate $800+ additional per cow, large dairies over 2,000 cows achieve sub-$14/cwt production costs, while mid-size farms succeed through strategic quality premiums and component optimization
  • Critical dates demand immediate planning: FSA forbearance expires December 31, 2025, new USMCA provisions kick in January 1, 2026, and Congressional Research Service projects $146.3 billion in ag debt needs restructuring Q1 2026—know your runway now
  • Regional advantages matter more than ever: California faces $400/acre-foot water costs but enjoys year-round production, the Northeast captures $2-5 fluid premiums despite 30% seasonal swings, Wisconsin’s 600 cheese plants create both opportunity and competition—match your strategy to your geography

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , ,

2,800 Dairy Farms Will Close This Year—Here’s the 3-Path Survival Guide for the Rest

Friday, October 17th, 2025
Mid-size dairies are discovering they have 18 months to pick: premium, scale, or strategic exit 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rabobank’s projection that 7-9% of U.S. dairy operations will disappear annually through 2027 isn’t just another statistic—it represents roughly 2,800 farms making their final milkings each year, with mid-size operations bearing the brunt of this consolidation. What farmers are discovering through hard experience is that traditional 150-400 cow dairies face an impossible equation: spending $35,000-$55,000 annually on calf management labor while those calves generate just $15,000-$30,000 in net returns. Research from Cornell and Wisconsin’s dairy programs confirms that the industry is bifurcating into two distinct models—premium differentiation, which captures 50-75% price premiums for the 20-25% of producers near metropolitan markets, and efficiency-focused operations that achieve costs $3-4 per hundredweight below average through scale and technology. The next 18 months represent a critical decision window, as environmental regulations tighten, the Farm Bill implementation begins, and processor consolidation accelerates the pressure on uncommitted operations. Here’s what’s encouraging: producers who recognize this shift and commit fully to one path—whether premium, efficiency, or strategic transition—are finding renewed profitability and purpose. The conversation isn’t about whether change is coming; it’s about choosing your direction while you still have options to shape your farm’s future on your terms.

According to Rabobank’s latest North American dairy outlook, we’re losing 7-9% of U.S. dairy operations annually through 2027—that’s potentially 2,800 farms disappearing each year. Walking through a 500-cow operation in County Roscommon last week, where Irish media reports indicate that Department of Agriculture inspections uncovered systematic management failures that had developed over several years, I saw firsthand what happens when mid-sized operations get caught between two increasingly divergent business models.

Here’s why the next 18 months matter: Environmental regulations are expected to tighten in key regions by 2026. The next USDA Farm Bill cycle begins implementation. And consolidation accelerates at a pace that makes waiting increasingly costly. The window for proactive choices is narrowing fast.

Rabobank’s projection isn’t just a statistic—it represents the death spiral of mid-size operations caught between impossible economics and regulatory pressure

Understanding the New Economics of Dairy Farm Profitability

Let me share some numbers that a Wisconsin producer showed me last month, as they reveal the impossible math that breaks traditional dairy models.

The shocking math behind dairy’s consolidation crisis: Mid-size operations spend double on labor what their entire calf enterprise generates

Consider a 500-cow operation—substantial by most regional standards, right? With normal breeding patterns, you’re managing approximately 250 bull calves annually. In current markets, based on what I’m seeing in USDA market reports, those dairy bull calves typically bring $50 to $200, depending on breed and season. Even with beef-cross breeding programs—which data from Cornell shows about two-thirds of Northeast dairies have now adopted—prices generally range from $150 to $400 in stronger markets.

The best-case scenario generates approximately $30,000 to $50,000 in gross revenue from the entire calf enterprise. After accounting for transportation, health management, and the typical 8-12% mortality rate that even well-managed operations experience, net returns often fall to $15,000 to $30,000.

Now, here’s where it gets uncomfortable: hiring dedicated calf management costs $35,000 to $55,000 annually, based on current agricultural wage data, excluding benefits and overhead.

You’re spending double on labor what the entire calf enterprise generates.

As one producer in central Wisconsin put it: “That math doesn’t work.” And you know what? It’s not just a Wisconsin problem. Down in the Southeast, where heat stress adds another layer, a Georgia dairyman running 600 cows told me at a recent conference: “Between June and September, my calf mortality jumps to 15%. The cost of climate-controlled housing would bankrupt us, but the losses are killing us slowly anyway.”

What’s happening in Florida is even tougher. A producer near Okeechobee shared that their summer calf mortality can hit 20% without intensive management. “We’re basically choosing between two ways to lose money,” she said.

Learning from Different Models Around the World

What’s particularly revealing is how various countries have addressed these structural challenges. Each approach tells us something about potential pathways forward.

Canada’s Quota System: When Compliance Becomes Valuable

Canadian dairy producers operate within a unique framework. According to recent data from the Canadian Dairy Commission, production quotas in provinces like Ontario currently trade at significant values—tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram of butterfat. A typical 70-cow operation might hold a quota worth well over a million dollars. Their proAction program, mandatory since 2017, ties welfare compliance directly to market access.

“The validation costs us about CAD$400 every two years,” a producer near Guelph told me during a recent Ontario farm tour. “But if we lose compliance, we can’t ship milk. That quota value? Gone. It completely changes how you think about management decisions.”

What I’ve noticed is that Canadian producers rarely discuss cutting corners on animal care. When your compliance is tied to an asset worth more than most people’s retirement funds, you find ways to make it work.

The Netherlands: Environmental Limits as Management Boundaries

The Dutch discovered something fascinating, almost by accident. After EU milk quotas ended in 2015, they implemented phosphate rights to manage environmental concerns. Research from Wageningen shows that this system effectively caps expansion—farmers must either acquire additional phosphate quotas or invest in manure processing, which typically costs between €10 and €25 per ton, sometimes more.

A researcher at Wageningen explained it well during a recent webinar: “We didn’t intend to prevent management overreach. But when expansion requires such significant capital investment, farmers naturally stay within their management capacity.”

Denmark: Market Premiums for Higher Standards

Denmark represents yet another model. Based on industry data from their agricultural council, they’ve implemented enhanced welfare standards beyond EU requirements. More importantly, cooperatives like Arla support these through sustainability incentive programs—real money per kilogram that can add up to thousands of euros annually for an average farm.

Robotic Systems in the Mountain West: A Different Path

What I’ve been watching with interest is how Mountain West producers are approaching this differently. I visited a 240-cow operation near Twin Falls, Idaho, that installed robotic milking units a few years back. “We went from three full-time employees to one,” the owner explained. “The robots cost us several hundred thousand, but we’re saving over $100,000 annually in labor. More importantly, our cows are healthier—somatic cell count dropped significantly.”

That’s not a path for everyone—you need reliable power, technical support within driving distance, and cows that adapt to the system. However, it demonstrates how technology can bridge some gaps for mid-sized operations.

The Emerging Bifurcation: Dairy Consolidation Trends Accelerate

Through conversations with agricultural economists at various land-grant universities, as well as lenders from Farm Credit and other institutions, a clear pattern emerges. As one Cornell economist recently put it: “We’re watching the industry split into two distinct business models, with the traditional middle ground becoming economically unsustainable.”

The Premium Path: Quality and Differentiation

The brutal math of dairy economics: Small operations lose money, mega-dairies print it, and the middle ground has vanished forever

Research from the USDA and analyses from agricultural lenders suggest 20-25% of production is moving toward differentiated markets. These operations capture real premiums—but success requires specific conditions.

Organic Valley’s latest member report shows that their farmers are receiving significantly higher prices—sometimes 50-75% premiums over conventional prices. But achieving this requires patient capital and proximity to premium markets.

A Vermont organic producer who successfully transitioned shared a valuable perspective at a recent conference: “Year one through three, we lost money. Years four through six, we broke even. Since year seven, we’ve been profitable. But that seven-year journey? Not everyone can make it.”

Here’s what consumer research consistently shows: only about a quarter of consumers regularly pay meaningful premiums for differentiated dairy products—and they’re concentrated in metropolitan areas with higher household incomes.

Beyond organic, there’s a young farmer in Texas who’s found success with A2 milk production. “We’re getting a 30% premium selling directly to Houston markets,” she told me. “But it took two years to build the customer base, and we had to change our breeding program completely.”

The Efficiency Model: Scale and Optimization

The majority of production—roughly 75%—continues moving toward efficiency-focused operations. USDA Census data shows the average U.S. dairy herd has grown significantly over recent years, with the largest operations now producing well over a third of the nation’s milk.

Mike, who manages 850 cows near Eau Claire through a combination of owned and leased facilities, shared his approach: “Every decision focuses on efficiency. We utilize precision feeding systems that significantly reduce feed costs. Automated health monitoring catches issues days earlier. Our per-hundredweight production cost runs well below the state average. In volatile markets, that’s survival.”

When milk prices experience significant volatility—as we have seen in recent years—large, efficient operations tend to survive, while smaller farms often struggle to cover their operating costs.

A California producer running 3,000 cows in the Central Valley puts it differently: “We’re not farming anymore, we’re manufacturing. Every process is standardized, measured, and optimized for efficiency. It’s not romantic, but it keeps us in business.”

The Challenge for Mid-Size Operations

Here’s where it gets difficult for operations between 150 and 400 cows—what USDA classifies as mid-size commercial dairies. They’re too small for significant economies of scale but too large for niche marketing approaches.

Research from dairy profitability programs consistently shows farms in this range have the highest per-hundredweight production costs and lowest return on assets. They incur compliance costs similar to those of larger operations but can’t spread them across a sufficient production volume.

A third-generation producer near Viroqua who recently sold his 185-cow operation explained: “We calculated everything honestly. After debt service, family living, and reinvestment needs, we were left with a net annual income of $18,000 for 70-hour weeks. The solar lease on our land now generates $52,000 annually with zero labor.”

This isn’t failure—it’s recognition of changed economics. And you know what? More folks are coming to similar conclusions.

Young Farmers Face Unique Pressures

What worries me most is what I’m hearing from young producers. At a recent young farmer conference in Madison, the mood was notably different than even two years ago.

“My parents want me to take over our 220-cow operation,” a 26-year-old from Minnesota told me. “But the numbers don’t work. I’d need to double the herd size to make it viable, which would mean incurring $2 million in debt. Or transition to organic, which means seven years of uncertainty. Either way, I’m betting my entire future on factors I can’t control.”

The next generation crisis: Access to capital and equipment costs create insurmountable barriers for young farmers, explaining dairy’s aging demographic

But there are success stories too. I met a 28-year-old in Pennsylvania who took over her family’s 180-cow operation and immediately began bottling milk on the farm. “We’re capturing $4 more per gallon than commodity pricing,” she said. “It was scary taking on the debt for processing equipment, but we’re actually profitable now.”

Data from beginning farmer programs shows dairy has the lowest rate of young farmer entry among agricultural sectors—just 6% of dairy farmers are under 35, compared to 8% across all agriculture. That should concern all of us.

Technology’s Role and Limitations

Examining precision dairy technologies reveals genuine benefits. Recent research in dairy science journals indicates that automated health monitoring can significantly reduce treatment costs and improve conception rates. Several Wisconsin producers report real improvements from adoption.

Yet technology alone won’t resolve structural challenges. Studies consistently find that most commercially available precision dairy systems haven’t been independently validated for all their claims.

As one precision dairy specialist noted at World Dairy Expo: “Technology amplifies good management. It doesn’t replace it or change basic economic realities.”

The technology truth: Health monitoring and precision feeding deliver fastest ROI, while robotic milking requires patient capital and skilled management

Carbon Credits and Environmental Opportunities

One emerging opportunity that’s still developing: carbon markets. California’s Air Resources Board offset program now includes dairy digesters, paying substantial amounts per metric ton of CO2 equivalent reduced. A large operation with a digester can generate $150,000 to $200,000 annually in carbon credits.

But here’s the catch—digester installation costs run into the millions, and you need consistent manure management to make it work. Plus, these programs favor larger operations that can afford consultants to navigate the complexity.

“It’s another way the big get bigger,” a medium-sized producer in California told me, shaking his head. “We looked at it, but the upfront costs and ongoing management requirements put it out of reach.”

What The Next 18 Months Will Bring

Based on regulatory filings, market projections, and discussions with industry analysts, several trends are accelerating toward critical decision points:

Environmental Regulations (By June 2026):

  • California’s methane reduction requirements are getting real teeth
  • The Netherlands is continuing with a significant reduction in dairy cow numbers through buyout programs
  • Wisconsin is implementing new phosphorus limits affecting hundreds of farms in sensitive watersheds

Market Consolidation (Accelerating Now):

  • That 7-9% annual reduction in farm numbers continues through 2027
  • Processor consolidation is creating fewer, larger milk buyers with stricter requirements
  • Premium market growth is slowing from the previous rapid expansion

Economic Pressures (Building Through 2026):

  • Federal Reserve keeping interest rates elevated through at least mid-2026
  • Input costs are stabilizing but remaining well above pre-2020 levels
  • Labor availability is declining, with visa costs increasing significantly

What farmers are finding is that these pressures compound each other. It’s not just one challenge—it’s all of them hitting simultaneously.

Making Strategic Decisions: Your Three Paths Forward

After analyzing hundreds of operations across different models, three viable strategies emerge. And honestly? There’s honor in all three choices.

Path 1: Commit to Premium Differentiation

Requirements:

  • Location within a reasonable distance of metropolitan markets with substantial populations
  • Capital for a multi-year transition period (typically several hundred thousand for a 200-cow operation)
  • Willingness to develop direct marketing relationships or join an established cooperative

First Three Steps:

  1. Contact established premium cooperatives for transition planning—they offer mentorship programs
  2. Engage the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service for transition funding opportunities
  3. Develop realistic cash flow projections with significant revenue discounts during transition

Success Example: A Vermont farm transitioned its 220-cow herd to organic production over a six-year period. They’re now grossing significantly more per hundredweight than regional conventional averages. “The transition nearly broke us,” the owner admits, “but we’re now set for the next generation.”

Path 2: Scale for Efficiency

Requirements:

  • Access to capital for expansion (typically thousands per cow for facilities and equipment)
  • Management systems for larger operations
  • Ability to weather significant price volatility

First Three Steps:

  1. Develop an expansion feasibility study with an agricultural lender—many offer specialized dairy expansion analysis
  2. Investigate management partnerships or qualified labor sources
  3. Implement precision management technologies, starting with feed management, for the fastest return

Success Example: Three neighbors in Idaho formed an LLC, consolidating their operations into a single, larger facility. Shared labor, bulk purchasing, and professional management significantly reduce costs. “Individually, we were struggling. Together we’re competitive.”

Path 3: Strategic Transition

Requirements:

  • Honest assessment of long-term viability
  • Understanding of asset values and alternative uses
  • Willingness to preserve equity while options exist

First Three Steps:

  1. Obtain a professional business valuation, including all assets
  2. Investigate alternative land uses (solar leases can generate substantial annual income in suitable locations)
  3. Consult a tax advisor regarding timing and structure

Success Example: A family converted their dairy to custom heifer raising and leased cropland, maintaining expertise while eliminating unprofitable segments. “We kept what we’re good at, eliminated what wasn’t working, and actually improved our quality of life.”

The Fourth Option: Cooperative Formation

What’s interesting is there’s potentially a fourth path emerging—small groups of producers forming new cooperatives. I’m watching a group of five 200-cow operations in Ohio that are exploring joint processing and marketing. “Individually we’re too small for premium markets, too big for farmers markets,” one explained. “Together we might have something.”

FactorPremium PathEfficiency PathStrategic Exit
Initial InvestmentHigh ($500K)Very High ($2M+)Minimal
Time to Profitability5-7 years3-5 yearsImmediate
Market AccessLimited/RegionalGlobal/CommodityN/A
Labor RequirementsHigh SkilledAutomated/TechN/A
Regulatory ComplianceComplexStandardMinimal
Milk Price Premium50-75%0%0%
Risk LevelMediumHighLow
Success Rate (%)256090

Looking Ahead: The Industry We’re Building

The dairy industry continues evolving toward this bifurcated structure. This isn’t a temporary disruption—it’s structural realignment driven by global economic forces.

What encourages me is seeing producers who’ve found their path and committed fully. Whether it’s the organic producer in Vermont finally turning profits, the Wisconsin operation that merged with neighbors to achieve scale, or the family that transitioned to custom heifer raising—success comes from clear decisions and full commitment.

The industry needs both models. Premium producers cater to consumers who are willing to pay for specific attributes. Efficient operations meet global demand for affordable nutrition. What it can’t sustain is the uncertain middle ground where costs exceed commodity returns but premiums remain out of reach.

For those committed to the future of dairy, multiple viable paths exist. The key is choosing one that aligns with your resources—financial, geographic, and personal—and executing fully. Half-measures don’t work in this environment. They never really have, but now it’s obvious.

As spring flush approaches in a few months, Holstein operations may have different considerations than Jersey farms when it comes to component pricing and efficiency models. But regardless of breed, the fundamental choice remains the same.

The conversation we need isn’t about whether this transformation is happening—it’s about how individual producers will navigate it successfully. That decision window remains open, but based on every indicator I’m tracking, it won’t stay open past 2026.

Choose your path. Commit fully. Execute well. The future belongs to those who do.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The calf enterprise math reveals the deeper crisis: Mid-size dairies are spending $35,000-$55,000 on labor to manage calves worth $15,000-$30,000 net—and that’s just one symptom of why farms with 150-400 cows show the highest production costs and lowest returns according to Wisconsin’s Center for Dairy Profitability
  • Three proven paths forward, each with specific requirements: Premium differentiation needs proximity to metro markets and 5-7 year transition capital; efficiency scaling requires $8,000-$12,000 per cow expansion investment; strategic transition preserves equity through alternatives like solar leases generating $800-$1,200 per acre annually
  • Regional solutions vary, but the timeline doesn’t: Whether you’re dealing with Southeast heat stress pushing calf mortality to 20%, California’s methane regulations, or Wisconsin’s phosphorus limits affecting 580 farms—the 18-month window before 2026 regulatory changes remains constant
  • Technology amplifies but doesn’t replace fundamentals: Automated health monitoring reduces treatment costs by 18% and robotic systems save $100,000+ annually in labor, but as precision dairy specialists confirm, these tools work only within economically viable business models
  • Young farmers face unique pressures requiring creative solutions: With only 6% of dairy farmers under 35 (versus 8% across agriculture), successful transitions involve innovations like on-farm bottling, capturing $4 more per gallon, or forming new cooperatives where five 200-cow operations achieve together what they couldn’t alone

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , ,

The $11 Billion Betrayal: Your Processor Is Building Your Replacement Right Now

Friday, October 17th, 2025

If you can’t write a $3M check tomorrow, you’re already extinct. The industry just hasn’t told you yet.

Okay, so I’m at World Dairy Expo last week—you know, wandering around trying to avoid the robot salesmen—and I run into this producer from Iowa. Guy’s been milking for thirty years; it’s a good operation, with about 300 head. And he tells me something that just… it stopped me cold.

He says, “I just spent $650,000 on robots, and I think I just financed my own funeral.”

Look, we need to discuss what’s really going on here. Because while you’re trying to figure out how to make your milk check cover feed bills—corn’s what, $4.50 now if you can find a decent load?—the processors are playing a completely different game. The International Dairy Foods Association is tracking over $11 billion in new processing capacity through 2028. Eleven billion. Meanwhile, they’re quietly partnering with these lab-grown protein companies that want to make you obsolete.

But here’s what makes me want to throw my coffee mug at the wall… North Dakota had 1,810 dairy farms when I started covering this industry back in 1987. The Census just came out—they’ve got twenty-four left. Twenty-four! I knew some of those guys who quit. Good farmers, smart operators. Didn’t matter.

(Read more “1,810 Dairy Farms to 24: Inside North Dakota’s Collapse,” this isn’t just a regional problem—it’s coming for everyone.)

And you know what? Your banker made money on every one of those exits. So did your co-op. Your processor? They just consolidated their routes and kept rolling.

So About All These New Plants Going Up…

So I’ve been following the Fairlife Webster, New York project—the one Governor Hochul showed up for at the groundbreaking back in April. They’re spending $650 million on this thing. When you read the press releases, Coca-Cola executives are talking about innovation and efficiency, and… honestly, reading between the lines, it sounds like a funeral for small dairy.

Here’s the deal—and Multiple sources familiar with the project tell me, but he doesn’t want his name associated with it—these plants are designed for one thing: mega-dairies that can deliver tank after tank of identical milk. Same butterfat, same protein, day after day. Less than 2% variation, he said.

You running 300 cows like my Iowa friend? Maybe you’re testing components once a month if you’re lucky? Brother, you’re not even on their radar.

The math is what bothers me… (hold on, let me find my notes from that Wisconsin conference)… Okay, so these plants need to run at basically full capacity to make a profit. Below 75% utilization, and they’re hemorrhaging cash. But—and here’s the kicker—milk production is actually going DOWN. The USDA says we’re off by about a quarter of a percent this year.

So what happens when you build all this capacity but there’s no milk to fill it?

Actually, I know what happens. I was talking to Mike Guenther—dairy farmer up in Nebraska, good guy, been through hell with his processor—and he told me flat out: “My infrastructure would be worth almost nothing if I tried to sell.” That’s because when there’s only one buyer in your region… well, you do the math.

The Robot Scam (And Why My Neighbor’s Wife Won’t Talk to Me Anymore)

Alright, so… robots. God, where do I even start?

My neighbor just put in a Lely system. Beautiful thing, all bells and whistles. His wife won’t talk to me anymore because I asked him—at his open house, with the Lely rep standing right there—”So what’s your exit strategy when this thing doesn’t pencil out?”

Look, I’ve seen the actual numbers from Wisconsin’s dairy center. Best case—and I mean absolute fairy-tale best case—you might save $38,000 a year on labor. Might. That’s if nothing breaks, which… have you seen the maintenance bills on these things? My cousin in Minnesota; his robot has been down three times since August. Three times!

Your components might improve—the sales team loves to talk about this—maybe even get you another twenty thousand if you’re shipping to someone who actually pays quality premiums. (Good luck finding that unicorn this time of year.) Production bump? Sure, maybe 8%, call it fifty thousand in a good year.

But that loan payment? You’re looking at damn near a hundred grand annually on $650,000. And that’s if you got decent terms, which… with milk prices where they are?

The thing that really gets me—and I was just discussing this with some folks at Penn State—is that the 2,000-cow operations don’t need robots to achieve these efficiencies. They get them automatically through scale. You’re literally paying three-quarters of a million dollars to achieve what the big guys get for free.

But hey, at least the robot dealer got his commission, right?

The Organic Mess (Or: How to Lose Money Even Faster)

Speaking of bad decisions… let me tell you about organic.

I was at a meeting in Vermont last month—beautiful country up there, with the leaves just starting to turn—and Ed Maltby from the Northeast Organic Group got up and said something that made half the room go silent: “We’ve been underwater on cost of production since 2018.”

Since 2018! Can you believe that?

Here’s how the organic trap works, and I’ve watched too many good farmers fall for this… You decide to transition, right? Takes three years. Three years of paying organic feed prices—last time I checked, depending on your region, we’re talking something like three hundred, three-fifty a ton for corn—while still getting paid conventional prices for your milk.

This producer I know in Wisconsin—she’s a smart woman who really knows her stuff—just finished her transition last spring. Guess what? Organic Valley’s not taking new producers. Horizon? They told her maybe next year, if she can guarantee 30,000 pounds daily. She’s doing 18,000.

The UK recently reported (I was reading this on the plane back from California) that it lost 7% of its organic herds in one year. One year! The USDA’s tracking similar numbers here—we’ve lost about a fifth of our organic dairies in the past five years.

And it’s not because they can’t produce organic milk. They can. It’s because nobody will buy it at a price that covers costs. The processors cherry-pick who they want, when they want.

Meanwhile, the certification consultants received their fees—ten to fifty thousand dollars, depending on the operation. The feed companies locked you into those premium contracts. Everyone made money except the farmer. Sound familiar?

Your Co-op Isn’t Your Friend Anymore

This is gonna piss some people off, but… whatever. It needs saying.

You know that DFA antitrust case? The one they settled for $50 million back in 2015? (Dean Foods kicked in another $30 million, by the way.) I was covering those hearings in Tennessee—what a circus that was. The stuff that came out about market manipulation…

But here’s what really matters: The practices they were accused of? That’s basically standard operating procedure now. Your average milk supply contract—and I’ve read dozens of these—requires 12 to 24 months’ notice if you want to leave. Some have these “loyalty bonuses” that turn into penalties if you exit.

I was talking to this farmer in Ohio last week… he wanted to switch processors, found someone offering fifty cents more per hundredweight. You know what his co-op told him? The additional hauling would eat up seventy cents. Take it or leave it.

Look at your co-op board sometime. Really look at them. How many are running mega-operations? A colleague who covers DFA meetings in the Midwest told me that at one regional meeting in Kansas, eight of twelve board members were shipping over 50,000 pounds daily. You think they care about the guy milking 150 cows?

They’re not representing you anymore. They’re managing your decline while protecting their own operations.

The Precision Fermentation Thing Nobody Wants to Talk About

Okay, this is where it gets really interesting… or terrifying, depending on how you look at it.

So, Leprino Foods—and if you don’t know, they basically own the pizza cheese market, with a market share of around 85%—announced on July 16, 2024, that they’re partnering with a Dutch company, Fooditive, to produce lab-grown casein.

Not researching it. Not thinking about it. Actually producing it. Their president, Mike Durkin, said they’re planning hundreds of thousands of tons. Starting next year.

Now, I was just reading the Good Food Institute’s latest report (fascinating stuff if you can’t sleep)… these lab proteins still cost way more than real dairy. We’re talking two to five times more expensive. But—and this is the part that should scare you—costs are dropping fast. The projections indicate that they will capture approximately 15% of the high-value protein market by 2030.

Why does that matter? Because those specialty proteins, those functional ingredients… that’s what’s been subsidizing your commodity milk price all these years. When that goes away…

Industry analysts are saying, but they work for one of the big dairy investment firms—and they told me straight up: “Traditional dairy will keep the volume markets, the cheap commodity stuff. But is everything profitable? That’s going to fermentation.”

The processors aren’t stupid. They see this coming. That’s why they’re building $11 billion in infrastructure for maybe 300 mega-farms while letting everyone else twist in the wind.

Why Everyone Needs You to Keep Losing Money

You want to know something that’ll make you sick?

Cornell’s farm management people did this study—I actually know Wayne Knoblauch, good guy, tells it straight—and they found that if you’re living off equity (basically burning through your farm’s value to cover losses), every year you wait to exit costs you fifty to a hundred grand in destroyed wealth.

But nobody’s gonna tell you to quit. Know why?

Your lender needs active loans on their books. I was talking to a Farm Credit loan officer at a bar in Madison—after a few beers, he admitted it—they’d rather restructure a bad loan five times than have a foreclosure on their report.

Your processor? They need volume. Lose half of their suppliers, and their entire system falls apart. I’ve seen the efficiency studies from Wisconsin—it’s brutal what happens to their costs when volume drops.

Extension can’t tell you to quit either. Too political. I know extension agents who’ve been pulled aside and told to focus on “farm viability strategies” not “transition planning.” Can you believe that?

What’s Really Coming (And It Ain’t Pretty)

People keep asking me about the future of dairy. There are three possible scenarios, or something.

There’s not. There’s one. And we’re already most of the way there.

The USDA’s latest numbers, which I just pulled yesterday, show that operations with more than 1,000 cows control about two-thirds of production now. Back in 2017? It was barely over half. The Census shows farms with 2,500 or more cows went from 714 to 834.

(Read more: “Pick Your Lane or Perish: The 18-Month Ultimatum”—the middle is disappearing.)

We’re not “heading toward” consolidation. We’re in year 15 of a 25-year comprehensive restructuring. By 2030? The International Farm Comparison Network projects we’re down to maybe 18,000 total dairy farms. By 2035? We’re looking at something like the poultry industry—vertical integration, contract production, three or four companies controlling everything.

You’ve got maybe two years to figure out where you fit in this picture. After that? The decision gets made for you.

The Bird Flu Wild Card That Has Everyone Spooked

But just as the mega-dairies feel invincible, an entirely new risk has emerged—a biological one that turns their efficiency into a vulnerability. And then there’s this H5N1 thing…

Nobody wants to discuss this at industry meetings, but I was just reviewing USDA’s latest report—we now have infected herds in 17 states. California alone had 475 confirmed cases as of December, according to that Congressional Research Service report. Wisconsin’s been testing thousands of milk samples since April.

Here’s what scares me: CDC research indicates that this virus can spread through milking equipment. You know what that means for these 2,500-cow operations? They’re basically petri dishes. One infected cow, and it spreads to the whole herd within days.

Meanwhile, that 50-cow farm everyone says isn’t viable? Suddenly, their isolation looks pretty smart, doesn’t it?

I was talking to a veterinarian in Arizona—they’re modeling this stuff now—and she thinks if this escalates… I mean, imagine consumers finding out there’s viral material in milk. Even if pasteurization makes it safe, which it does, the demand hit could be catastrophic.

But hey, don’t count on bird flu to save small dairy. That’s not a business plan.

The Exit Math Nobody Will Show You

Alright, let’s talk about getting out. Because for a lot of you, that’s the smartest move, and I’m tired of pretending otherwise.

Wisconsin’s farm center won’t publish this directly—too controversial—but if you read between the lines… Say you’re running 200 cows and losing $75,000 a year after accounting for family living expenses. Pretty common scenario these days.

Keep going for five years? You burn through $375,000 in equity. By the time you finally quit, you’re down to maybe $1.1 million in assets. At 4% returns—if you’re lucky—that’s $45,000 a year in retirement.

But if you exit now with $1.5 million still intact? Same 4% gets you $60,000. That’s fifteen grand more every year for the rest of your life.

Signs You Should Exit Now

  • Losing more than $50,000 annually after family living expenses
  • Over 55 with no succession plan
  • Debt-to-asset ratio above 60%
  • Single processor within 50 miles
  • Can’t afford $500,000 in upgrades
  • Working 80+ hours weekly with no vacation in 3 years

I know appraisers who’ll tell you—off the record—selling separately gets you way more than selling as a complete dairy. Land to crop farmers, cows to other dairies, equipment at auction. You might get 30-50% more that way. Stage it over 18-24 months for tax purposes, and watch the Class III futures for timing.

But your banker won’t run these numbers for you. Your co-op sure as hell won’t. And extension? They can’t even have this conversation without risking their funding.

The Bottom Line (Or: What I’d Tell My Own Son)

Look… I’ve been covering this industry for almost forty years. I’ve seen good farmers, smart people, hardworking families get absolutely destroyed by forces beyond their control.

The consolidation we’re seeing? It’s 70% done already. The infrastructure being built isn’t for family farms—it’s for their replacement. Every “solution” they’re pushing—robots, organic, value-added—it’s designed to extract what value you have left before you’re forced out anyway.

If you’re under 500 cows without a clear path to premium markets? You need millions to scale up (good luck with that), or years of off-farm income to transition to specialty markets (also good luck), or… you need to think about exiting while you still have something to exit with.

If you’re my age—late 50s, early 60s—without someone to take over? Every day you wait is lighting money on fire. Simple as that.

Thinking about robots? That $650,000 might buy you five to seven years of life. Then what? If you don’t have a ten-year plan after the robot, you’re just financing your own extinction with interest.

The hardest truth—and I’ve looked at enough financial data to feel pretty confident about this—probably 60-70% of current dairy farmers would be better off financially by selling tomorrow. Not next year. Not after corn harvest. Tomorrow.

But nobody in this industry will tell you that. They need you operating, even at a loss. Your losses keep their system running.

You know what you are now? You’re not a dairy farmer. You’re an unwitting participant in your own wealth extraction. The only question is whether you’ll recognize it before it’s too late.

I’m not sure… maybe I’m wrong. Maybe there’s some miracle coming that’ll save small dairy. But I was at an auction last month—good family, who had farmed that land for four generations—and watching them sell off everything piece by piece… The old man was trying not to cry, and his son just looked angry…

That’s not how this is supposed to end. But for most of us, that’s exactly how it will end unless we face reality now.

Look, make your own decision. But make it with your eyes open. Because in about 24 months, maybe less, the decision gets made for you.

And trust me—you want to be the one making that call, not having it forced on you.

Share this with every dairy farmer you know. They deserve the truth.

The decision is coming. The only power you have left is to make it yourself.

Key Takeaways:

  • Your 24-Month Countdown Starts Now: $11B in processor overcapacity will crash prices by 2027—only 300 mega-farms survive the engineered consolidation
  • The $375,000 Decision: Exit today = $60k/year retirement. Bleed equity five more years = $45k/year. Your banker won’t show you this math
  • Robot Truth: You pay $100k annually to save $38k in labor—meanwhile, 2,000-cow operations get same efficiency free through scale
  • The Betrayal Is Complete: Processors partnered with lab-protein companies (Leprino/Fooditive, July 2024) while selling you “growth solutions”
  • Three Options Left: Find $3M to scale past 1,000 cows, secure premium markets with off-farm income, or exit while assets have value

Executive Summary:

An Iowa dairy farmer told me last week: “I spent $650,000 on robots and just financed my own funeral.” He’s absolutely right—and the betrayal runs deeper than you know. Processors are investing $11 billion in infrastructure designed exclusively for 300 mega-dairies while partnering with lab-protein companies (Leprino/Fooditive, July 2024) to replace traditional dairy’s profitable products. The math reveals everything: farmers losing $75,000 annually would save $375,000 by exiting today versus operating for five more years, yet every institution—your bank, co-op, processor—needs you to bleed equity to maintain their economics. With 24 months until processing overcapacity crashes milk prices and forces mass consolidation, you face three options: find $3 million to scale beyond 1,000 cows, secure premium markets with off-farm income support, or exit strategically while assets retain value. For 60-70% of current operations, immediate exit preserves the most family wealth—but nobody will tell you this because your losses subsidize their entire business model.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Learn More:

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Categories : Dairy Industry
Tags : , , , , ,

The Farnear Formula: How Strategic Thinking Built a Sixty-Year Dairy Dynasty

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2025

1960: Joe Simon paid 5x more for semen while neighbors bought cheap. 2024: Two Farnear bred bulls win Premier Sire at World Dairy Expo.

Tom Simon (center, holding banner) and the Farnear team celebrate a historic achievement at the 2024 World Dairy Expo, where Farnear Delta Lambda-ET and Farnear Altitude Red-ET were both named Premier Sires—a testament to sixty years of strategic breeding.

What strikes me about successful dairy breeding is… It’s never about luck—it’s about having a philosophy and sticking to it through thick and thin.

Take what happened at Farnear last October. Tom Simon is watching the Grand Champion presentations at World Dairy Expo when the announcement comes: two Premier Sires from one operation, Farnear Delta Lambda-ET leading Black Holsteins, Farnear Altitude Red-ET topping Red & Whites.

“Dad would’ve been so proud,” Tom tells me, his eyes scanning cows whose genetics trace back sixty years to those first strategic decisions that built everything they have today.

When Vision Looked Expensive

Joe Simon, pictured here at the 1989 Iowa State Dairy Show with a champion Holstein female, embodying the early success and unwavering commitment to genetic excellence that laid the groundwork for Farnear’s sixty-year dynasty. This dedication preceded the national validation that would come with Papoose.

Here’s the thing about Joe Simon’s approach back in the ’60s… most Iowa farms were content running grade cattle, keeping genetics costs manageable. Joe made a completely different calculation.

He bought eight registered Holstein heifers and committed to using premium AI—semen that cost three to five times what neighbors were paying.

What strikes me about that decision is how it reflected a fundamental business principle that too many producers still miss today.

“Dad’s philosophy was simple,” Tom explains. “It costs the same to feed a bad cow as a good cow, so invest your time and effort wisely.”

You’re looking at daughters you won’t milk for two years, granddaughters you won’t evaluate for four. In dairy, where cash flow challenges can quickly sink operations, Joe was making calculated investments with decade-long payoffs.

But Joe understood something the industry is still learning: genetic excellence isn’t an expense—it’s the foundation on which everything else builds.

“I always remember my dad standing firm on his principles,” Tom shares. “He’d say the best investment he could make was in the best bulls available.”

The Proof Validated Everything

Enter Farnear Mark Lizzy Papoose, who earned Reserve All-American and Best Bred & Owned at the 1993 World Dairy Expo. This wasn’t just validation—it was complete vindication of strategic thinking.

Farnear Mark Lizzy Papoose EX-95, pictured here after earning Reserve All-American and Best Bred & Owned at the 1993 World Dairy Expo. This historic win provided complete vindication of Joe Simon’s strategic genetic investments, proving his “different” approach was profoundly “right.”

“Papoose proved Dad’s approach wasn’t just different—it was right,” Tom reflects. “She produced consistently, stayed sound, and passed those traits to her offspring. That’s when we really understood the power of investing in proven genetics.”

Most operations would’ve considered that level of success sufficient. Farnear expanded into embryo transfer instead, continuing to build on their genetic foundation.

Strategic Investment During Crisis

Fast forward to 2008. Markets imploding, feed corn hitting record prices—I recall corn reaching $8 in some markets—neighbors struggling to make ends meet. While others were cutting every possible cost, Farnear made another strategic move.

They invested in the Apple family.

Tom Simon (at left) pictured with the original Apple family partners—Bill Rauen, Tom Schmitt, John Erbsen, and Mike Deaver. This strategic collaboration and investment in the Apple cow family during the 2008 crisis proved to be a pivotal decision, leading to champions like Aria Adler.

“At the time, we believed investing in Apple would open new opportunities for our farm while staying true to Dad’s philosophy of using the best genetics available,” Tom explains. The confidence in that decision—made during one of dairy’s toughest periods—speaks to the strategic thinking that drives everything at Farnear.

What came next? Farnear Aria Adler-ET *RC EX-96, the 2021 All-American Production Cow. Sons and grandsons like Altitude and Audacious-Red. Daughters nominated All-American. The kind of genetic influence that shapes breed directions for generations.

Farnear Aria Adler-ET *RC EX-96, the 2021 All-American Production Cow, exemplifies the success born from Farnear’s strategic investment in the Apple family during the challenging economic times of 2008.

What Genomics Changed About Everything

What happened next completely transformed our understanding of genetic progress.

Genomics didn’t just change the timeline—it validated the strategic approach Joe Simon had been advocating for decades. According to recent work by researchers at agricultural universities, genomic selection can increase genetic progress by up to 300%, with accuracy improving more rapidly than initially predicted in 2008.

“It’s fascinating how genomics aligned perfectly with our philosophy,” Tom explains. “We went from waiting years for daughter performance to selecting high-performance, well-balanced animals based on DNA at six months old. Talk about accelerating the return on genetic investment.”

Delta Lambda exemplifies this evolution perfectly. When those genomic evaluations came back, they painted a clear picture: exceptional udder traits, type characteristics that appeal to commercial operations, production potential that satisfies demanding herds.

What’s particularly noteworthy is how commercial dairies initially embraced him. The show ring success followed—complete validation of breeding for function over flash.

“Lambda proved himself in working herds first, then started seeing success in the show ring,” Tom observes. “That’s exactly how we hoped it would work.”

When Technology Became the Judge

Here’s where things get really interesting… the 2021 robotic milking installation became an unplanned audit of their entire breeding philosophy.

The Farnear robotic milking facility, captured at dawn, stands as a testament to the family’s long-standing focus on functional traits. This modern barn showcases how their breeding philosophy prepared their herd for the demands of advanced automation, turning genetic foresight into operational efficiency.

Walking through that facility—the steady hum of precision machinery, robotic arms moving with surgical accuracy, sensors evaluating each cow—you realize how prescient their focus on functional traits has been.

“Robots demand perfection in ways human milkers can compensate for,” Tom explains. “Precise teat placement, ideal udder attachment, calm temperament, strong feet and legs—all the functional traits we’ve always emphasized are now operational necessities.”

This robotic revolution is accelerating everywhere. Current industry data indicate that adoption is reaching double digits across major dairy regions, with some European areas approaching 50%. What’s remarkable is how Farnear’s breeding decisions positioned them perfectly for this technological shift.

Uniformity in udder quality and leg structure, as seen in these Farnear-bred cows, is a direct result of their long-standing focus on functional traits. These are the physical characteristics that not only contribute to longevity and production but are also critical for seamless operation in modern robotic milking systems.

Udder depth, teat length, rear leg set—these aren’t just linear trait scores anymore. They’re operational requirements determining whether cows can function in modern dairy systems.

The Foundation: Proven Cow Families

But here’s what drives everything they do: behind every technological advancement lies the real foundation—cow families.

“Female lineages drive everything we do,” Tom emphasizes. “We study matriarchal lines like Apple, Lila Z, Delicious—families that consistently deliver what you want to milk generation after generation.”

Miss OCD Robst Delicious-ET EX-94, a foundational female who embodies the consistent excellence of the Delicious cow family. Her elite genetics and flawless conformation reinforce the Farnear philosophy of relying on proven matriarchal lines to build a sustainable, competitive herd.

This systematic approach reflects deep strategic thinking. While some programs focus on individual trait improvements, Farnear invests in proven family consistency—a strategy that requires more patience but yields more sustainable results.

“We want solid production, sound linear traits, strong health records, and bulletproof sire stacks,” Tom explains their selection criteria. “Fertility and longevity matter, but we believe great cow families have more lasting impact than chasing individual traits.”

How Real Collaboration Works

Three generations of the Simon family—including Joe (seated left center), Tom (standing right), and the next generation of Mark (standing left) and Adam (seated right)—continue to drive the Farnear legacy. Their collaborative approach, blending experience with innovation, ensures the perpetuation of their strategic breeding philosophy.

The decision-making process operates as a true family partnership, and I mean that in the best possible way.

“We work together seamlessly on every major decision,” Tom explains. “I handle bull selection, while Mark and Adam focus on mating strategies. Different expertise, unified philosophy.”

This collaborative approach ensures every decision aligns with their core principles while benefiting from diverse perspectives and expertise.

“Three generations bringing different insights to the same goal—breeding cattle that excel in both production and type,” Tom notes. “That collaboration keeps us focused and effective.”

The Balance That Actually Matters

This is where you see Farnear’s real understanding of long-term success.

“We’ve always focused on breeding cattle that excel in both production and type,” Tom explains. “Dad believed in balance—cows that not only produce exceptional volumes but also have the structural correctness to stay sound and productive for years.”

Farnear Aria Adler-ET EX-96, pictured while winning First Place Production Cow at the 2021 International Holstein Show. Her striking udder capacity and overall structural correctness perfectly illustrate the balance between production and type that defines the Farnear breeding philosophy.

This balanced approach reflects Joe Simon’s fundamental wisdom about comprehensive genetic value. Current industry trends indicate an increasing emphasis on this balanced breeding approach as operations shift away from single-trait selection.

“Quality isn’t just about milk in the tank,” Tom notes, echoing his father’s philosophy. “It’s about structural soundness, longevity, and the ability to thrive in modern dairy systems. Remember—it costs the same to feed a bad cow as a good cow, so invest your resources wisely.”

But That’s Not the Whole Story

What really amplified their impact was joining GenoSource in 2014—pooling resources with seven other pioneering breeding families. (Read more: From Pasture to Powerhouse: The GenoSource Story)

The power of collaboration: Tom Simon (center) with his partners and nephews who are part of the GenoSource alliance. This strategic partnership amplifies Farnear’s genetic impact and market reach, proving that joining forces with other industry leaders is a key component of long-term success.

“Individual operations have natural limitations,” Tom observes. “Strategic collaboration allows us to achieve genetic impact and market reach that none of us could manage independently.”

This partnership demonstrates confidence in their genetic program while expanding their ability to influence breed improvement across multiple markets and management systems.

Ladyrose Caught Your Eye EX-94, an All-American and All-Canadian winner, exemplifies the power of strategic collaboration. As a co-owned animal within the GenoSource partnership, she showcases the exceptional genetics and market reach that are possible when industry-leading breeders pool their resources.

Going Global (Whether You Plan to or Not)

What’s particularly impressive is how Farnear’s influence now extends globally, with genetics performing successfully in diverse climates and management systems from high-input Midwest operations to extensive grazing systems overseas.

“Different regions need different genetic solutions,” Tom explains. “Heat tolerance for Southern operations, component production for cheese markets, longevity for grazing systems—we breed for versatility and performance across diverse conditions.”

Current market analysis from industry publications suggests continued emphasis on genetic efficiency over volume in 2025. Farnear’s balanced approach positions them perfectly for these evolving market demands.

What the Next Generation Brings

The future of dairy breeding is on full display at the World Expo, the next generation of Farnear showcasing top-tier genetics, Adios, Junior Champion of the 2023 International Junior Show. Events like these highlight the passion of the next generation and the enduring appeal of well-bred cattle, echoing the multi-generational vision of the Farnear family.

Mark and Adam aren’t just carrying forward tradition—they’re integrating modern analytical tools with proven breeding wisdom.

“They see patterns and opportunities we might miss,” Tom smiles. “Fresh perspectives on data we’ve been analyzing for years. That combination of experience and innovation creates success for our next generation.”

Their integration of AI analytics and precision management with time-tested breeding principles demonstrates how the Farnear philosophy adapts and evolves while maintaining core consistency.

The future of Farnear: Matt Simon and his family represent the fifth generation, ensuring the enduring legacy of strategic breeding and family partnership continues for decades to come.

The Lesson for Everyone Else

Here’s what makes Farnear’s success story particularly valuable: it stems from consistent strategic thinking rather than fortunate timing or lucky breaks.

Using superior genetics when others accepted average. Investing in Apple during challenging economic times. Embracing genomics early while maintaining focus on balanced breeding. Collaborating strategically with other industry leaders.

KHW Regiment Apple-Red-ET, the matriarch whose genetic consistency and impact have shaped generations of champions—proof that a long-term investment in proven cow families pays dividends for decades.

“The most expensive mistake in dairy breeding isn’t what you spend on genetics,” Tom emphasizes. “It’s what you lose by not investing wisely in the first place.”

In an industry where genetic improvement spans generations, today’s breeding decisions determine your competitive position for decades ahead.

The Bottom Line

Tom Simon (second from right), alongside sons Adam (left) and Matt (right), and his nephew Mark (second from right), stands at the Farnear Holsteins sign. This team represents the enduring commitment to strategic genetic investment that has built a sixty-year dynasty and is poised to lead the family business into the next generation.

When that recognition came through at World Dairy Expo last October, it represented more than breeding achievement. It validated Joe’s strategic vision that genetic excellence isn’t an expense—it’s the foundation for sustainable competitive advantage.

The Farnear story demonstrates that strategic genetic investment, guided by clear principles and long-term thinking, creates lasting value in ways that short-term cost-cutting never can.

What some might call expensive investments today often become the competitive advantages that define tomorrow’s industry leaders.

The dairy industry continues learning from what the Simons established sixty years ago: strategic thinking and premium genetics aren’t luxuries—they’re the foundation of sustained success in modern dairy production.

Key Takeaways

  • Premium genetics cost 3-5x more but deliver generational ROI—invest for decades, not quarters
  • Genomic selection accelerates progress 300%: select proven genetics at 6 months vs 4+ years waiting
  • Robotic systems require functional perfection: udder depth, teat placement now drive profitability directly
  • Bet on proven cow families like Apple, Lila Z—genetic consistency outperforms trait chasing every time

Executive Summary

The Farnear Formula shows how strategic genetic investment over six decades built a Premier Sire dynasty, proving long-term thinking beats short-term cost-cutting in dairy breeding. Joe Simon’s core belief—”it costs the same to feed a bad cow as a good cow”—drove his decision to invest 3-5x more in premium genetics during the 1960s, creating generational success. The 2008 crisis tested this approach when Farnear bought into the Apple family while competitors retreated, producing 2021 All-American Aria Adler and her champion offspring. Genomic technology accelerated progress 300%, enabling selection at six months versus years of waiting, while robotic systems confirmed their focus on functional traits like udder depth and teat placement. Farnear’s team approach and emphasis on proven families like Apple, Lila Z, and Delicious shows how strategic decisions compound over generations. Their dual Premier Sire wins at 2024 World Dairy Expo cap decades of patient investment in genetic excellence over trends.

Learn More:

  • Boosting Dairy Farm Efficiency: How Robotic Milking Transforms Workflow and Reduces Labor – This article provides a tactical breakdown of implementing robotic milking systems, a key technological shift discussed in the Farnear piece. It offers practical guidance on barn design and workflow optimization, demonstrating how to directly translate the breeding philosophy of functional traits into tangible operational benefits.
  • Dairy Industry Trends 2025 – This strategic overview analyzes key economic and market dynamics for 2025. It reveals how factors like fluctuating milk prices and changing global demands can impact profitability, providing essential context for why a long-term strategic approach to genetic investment, like the Farnear Formula, is a critical risk-reduction strategy for sustained success in a volatile market.
  • The Role of Genomics in Advancing Dairy Herd Genetics – This article would explain the science and practical application of genomics in dairy breeding. It would provide actionable insights into how to use genomic data to select for specific traits, accelerating genetic progress and validating a strategic breeding philosophy years before daughter performance data becomes available, as demonstrated in the Farnear story.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Breeder Profiles
Tags : , , , , ,

Cents and Sensors: How Top Dairies Are Cashing In

Tuesday, August 26th, 2025

Farms boosting profits by $400 per cow? It’s happening, and here’s how.

Executive Summary: Here’s the deal—precision tech isn’t a future dream anymore; it’s putting real money in farm checks. Farms adopting these tools report an extra $200–$400 net profit per cow annually. Feed costs can drop by up to 25%, and automated health checks catch lameness with 85% accuracy—double what a quick barn walk finds. From Europe, trimming carbon footprints by 6–9%, to bold moves in Denmark and the Midwest, this trend marries profit with sustainability. Cornell and UC Davis experts warn that the gap between adopters and laggards is widening. With milk selling for around $19/cwt, squeezing margins, this is a no-brainer ROI play—you should consider this now.

Key Takeaways

  • Cut feed costs by up to 25% with AI-optimized rations—talk to your nutritionist about precision feeding to lock in savings this season.
  • Save $300–$500 per cow annually by catching lameness early—install automated health monitors as per Journal of Dairy Science findings.
  • Expect a 2–5 year payback on robotic milking investments, which is critical when $19/cwt milk prices erode margins.
  • Confirm your infrastructure: 480 V three-phase power and at least 25 Mbps upload—tech only pays if it runs smoothly.
  • Watch regional trends: the Midwest races toward robotics, the West maximizes feed efficiency in drought, and Europe drives carbon cuts—tailor your strategy accordingly.
dairy technology, robotic milking ROI, farm efficiency, herd health monitoring, dairy farm profitability

Let’s be clear about AI in dairy: it’s not theory anymore—it’s cash in your pocket. Farms using these tools are seeing an extra $200–$400 in annual cash flow per cow. This isn’t just one miracle gadget; it’s a savvy mix of feed savings, sharper health monitoring, and production boosts.

Slashing Feed Costs, Boosting Herd Health

Feeding has long been the farm’s biggest cost drain. Precision feeding systems can pay for themselves in as little as two years, typically by year four. According to a 2024 University of Illinois Extension bulletin, AI-optimized rations trim about $0.30 per cow per day in feed costs without denting yields.

Health monitoring is quietly emerging as a key player. A 2023 Journal of Dairy Science study found that automated systems spot lameness with 85% accuracy—double the accuracy of what we detect by eye—saving around $300–$500 per cow annually and boosting fertility, as confirmed by Cornell research.

At milk near $19 per hundredweight and feed gobbling over half the check, automation is no longer a luxury. European farms under strict sustainability mandates reduce their carbon footprints by up to 9% while maintaining—or even increasing—production.

From Robots to Lameness Detection: Tech in Action

Today’s tech watches over 50 cow behaviors—from chewing time to standing duration—flagging trouble days before visible symptoms. Here are a few standout examples:

  • SCR’s Heatime system hits 95% accuracy in detecting heats. With its acquisition of CattleEye, GEA now monitors over 100,000 cows worldwide for lameness and changes in condition.
  • The Vray Holsteins farm in France, a roughly 200-cow operation, recorded a 10% production increase after installing Lely A4 robots, with fresh cows regularly producing over 40 kg/day.

Calculating the Real Cost of Automation

The initial investment for robotic systems ranges from $75,000 for small setups to over $ 600,000 at scale. Brazilian studies suggest a typical payback near five years. Additionally, budget for annual maintenance (15–20% of capital costs), software subscriptions, and increased electricity bills.

Avoiding the Implementation Pitfalls

Implementation hurdles often boil down to wiring and team training. Purdue’s Dr. John Bernard recommends phased rollouts—start small, build confidence, then scale.

  • Infrastructure: Rock-solid 480 V three-phase power and ≥ 25 Mbps upload.
  • Integration: Systems must “talk” or data silos stall progress.
  • Cybersecurity: Swiss dairies faced ransomware freezes—plan defenses now.

Smart Start: Actionable Tech Tips for Dairy Operators

  • Review 30-day feed costs; target a 20% cut with AI rations (UIUC Extension).
  • Audit robotic milking weekly; aim for ≥ 2.8 visits/cow/day (Midwest benchmark).
  • Flag 3–5 high-risk cows weekly via lameness alerts; treat within 48 hrs.
  • Verify electrical/internet readiness before upgrades: 480 V three-phase, 25 Mbps upload.
  • Phase rollouts over 3–6 months, prioritizing staff training and data integration.

The Verdict: Adapt or Be Left Behind

Halter’s $100M raise vaulted its valuation past $1B; McKinsey forecasts up to $90B in ag-AI value by 2030. Regional flavors matter: Midwest automation for labor, West precision feeding amid drought, Europe’s sustainability tech, and Denmark’s near-universal robotics.

Dr. Sarah Johnson of UC Davis warns that the gulf between adopters and laggards is widening. Cornell’s Dr. Michael Gould of the Dyson School offers a stark conclusion:

“At Cornell, we say waiting could cost you your competitive edge—the time to act is now.”

This isn’t tinkering at the edges; it’s a farm-management revolution. The pack is already sprinting. The only question is whether you’ll lead it or watch it disappear over the horizon.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Technology
Tags : , , , ,

Five Forces Reshaping Your Dairy’s Bottom Line

Sunday, August 24th, 2025

The dairy industry is being reshaped by 5 powerful forces. Are you prepared to adapt, or will you be left behind?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s what I’m hearing from farms I visited: The labor problem isn’t going away — 51% of our dairy workforce is immigrant, producing 80% of the milk. When that’s shaky, so is your paycheck. Farmers like Tom down in Wisconsin dropped $500K on robotic milkers and cut labor costs by half while boosting production 12%. Plant-based milk’s still a $36 billion competitor, reshaping markets and pushing us to up our game. AI on feeding? It’s saving farmers up to 15% on feed costs… cash in the pocket and healthier cows. Sustainability’s not just good for the planet — $18K+ per year from programs and energy sales says it pays. If you’re sticking to old ways, it’s time to rethink. Jump on these trends or risk falling behind.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Slash labor dependency with robotics — 28% of farms now using automated systems report payback under 2 years, especially with current wage pressures. Start researching cooperative buying if the upfront cost seems steep.
  • Push those milk components hard — average butterfat hit 4.36% this year, and that ain’t just a number, it’s premium cash. Talk to your nutritionist about optimizing for components over volume.
  • Cut feed bills using AI precision feeding — farms are seeing up to 15% savings on feed costs while improving cow health. With feed representing 50%+ of operating costs, that’s serious money.
  • Diversify income through sustainability programs — verified regenerative practices and biogas systems are generating $18K+ in additional annual revenue that doesn’t fluctuate with milk prices.
  • Master volatility management like a pro — with milk forecasts ranging $22-23/cwt, using Dairy Margin Coverage and forward contracts isn’t optional anymore. It’s survival insurance.

You know what? I’ve been crisscrossing dairy country lately—from Wisconsin’s rolling pastures to California’s sprawling operations—and everywhere I stop, the conversation circles back to the same thing.

The ground is shifting under our feet. Not the usual market ups and downs we’ve weathered for generations, but structural changes that are fundamentally rewriting how we think about dairy farming.

And I’m not being dramatic here. This is real stuff that’s happening right now, affecting operations I know personally.

Force 1: The Labor & Automation Equation

Let’s start with the elephant in the barn that everyone’s talking about but nobody wants to address head-on.

Here’s the tough reality: 51% of our dairy workforce consists of immigrant labor, which produces nearly 80% of the nation’s milk. That’s not just a statistic—that’s the backbone of American dairy, and right now it’s dangling in a storm of policy uncertainty and political rhetoric that could snap it clean off.

What happens if that lifeline goes? Economic models paint a stark picture: a 90% spike in retail milk prices and a $32 billion hit to the broader economy. The H-2A guest worker program? It’s designed for seasonal work, making year-round dairy operations ineligible for this critical labor pipeline.

So when labor volatility meets rising wages, farms like Tom’s in Wisconsin face a hard choice: adapt fast or fold.

Tom’s running 450 Holsteins, been doing it the same way for two decades. But when I walked into his barn last month, I didn’t see Tom or his usual crew of three guys at morning milking. Instead, I watched two sleek DeLaval robots doing the work.

“Cut my labor costs clean in half,” Tom told me over coffee afterward, that satisfied look dairy farmers get when the numbers actually work out. “Payback’s been about 18 months instead of the five years they promised, thanks to what I’m paying for decent help these days.”

The investment? $500,000 for two robotic milking units—about $250,000 per robot. However, what caught my attention was that Tom’s production increased by 12% after the switch, and his component levels also improved. Not because robots milk better than people (though they’re pretty consistent), but because his cows can choose when to get milked. Instead of that rigid twice-a-day schedule, they’re hitting those robots about 2.8 times daily on average.

However, here’s the catch that’s reshaping our entire industry: not every operation can afford that kind of capital investment, especially when you’re already juggling feed costs, equipment payments, and all the other expenses. The constant churn of labor volatility only stokes the urgency to invest, creating a permanent divide between those who can afford the technology and those who can’t.

Force 2: The Data-Driven Bottom Line

Now, this robot revolution isn’t just about replacing people—it’s about the explosion of information these machines generate.

We’re talking 50+ data points per cow, per day. Activity levels, rumination patterns, milk conductivity, and step counts —things that would take a human hours to track—are happening automatically, and the farms that master this data are pulling ahead quickly.

The University of Wisconsin’s Dairy Brain project has been pioneering this approach, and their results are pretty impressive. Dr. Kent Weigel’s team has demonstrated that AI-powered feeding decisions can reduce feed costs by up to 15% in some herds—that’s real money, translating to over $30 per cow annually, simply from smarter rations.

“What we’re seeing,” Weigel told me during a recent industry meeting, “is that precision nutrition isn’t just about efficiency anymore. These systems are reducing nitrogen excretion by 5.5 kg per cow while maintaining production levels.”

I was chatting with farmers at a county meeting in Minnesota, and they’re not just tracking this data—they’re transforming their operations based on it. Early mastitis detection with 72% accuracy, individualized feeding programs, optimal breeding timing—it’s like having a digital herdsman that never sleeps.

But here’s the thing that separates the winners from the also-rans: you’ve got to be able to interpret all this information. The successful farms aren’t just the ones with the fanciest equipment—they’re the ones that can turn data into informed decisions.

Force 3: The Component-First Mandate

OK, let me tell you about something that’s completely flipping how we think about milk quality. And I mean completely.

I was at a processor meeting in Wisconsin last month, and the purchasing manager laid it out plain: “We don’t care about your gallons anymore. We care about what’s in those gallons.”

Here’s the data that’ll knock your socks off: while overall U.S. milk production dropped 0.35% year-to-date, milk solids production jumped 1.65%. Farmers are literally changing the composition of what they’re producing, pushing butterfat from an average of 3.95% five years ago to 4.36% today.

Why? Because processors are investing over $8 billion in new cheese and butter plants, rather than fluid milk facilities. These plants need high-component milk to run efficiently, and they’re willing to pay for it.

The export numbers tell the whole story. Over the last year, U.S. butter exports increased by 41%, with some specialty butterfat products rising by over 500%. When U.S. butter hits world markets at $2.33 per pound while European butter costs $3.75, that’s not just competitive—that’s dominance.

Here’s why this matters more than ever: milk price volatility makes these component premiums absolutely essential for survival. When the base price swings wildly, farms that optimize for butterfat and protein have a premium buffer that can mean the difference between profit and loss.

I know guys in Minnesota who’ve completely redesigned their nutrition programs around maximizing components. They’re breeding for butterfat and protein, tweaking rations down to the individual cow level, and the premiums they’re getting make it worth every penny spent on genetic programs.

The math is simple: farms focused on volume are producing a lower-value commodity in a market that’s demanding high-value raw materials.

Force 4: The Sustainability Payoff

Now, here’s where things get interesting from a business perspective, and frankly, where I see some of the biggest opportunities to buffer against market volatility.

Sarah runs a beautiful operation down in Tillamook County, Oregon. She’s been doing regenerative grazing for about five years now, and when I looked at her books… well, let’s just say she’s not doing it for the warm fuzzies.

“DFA’s paying me $18,000 a year just for documenting what I’m already doing,” Sarah explained while we watched her Holsteins rotate through a silvopasture system she’s developed. “Cover crops, rotational grazing, reduced tillage—it’s not just better for the soil, it’s cutting my input costs by about 20%.”

But the real kicker? Sarah has an anaerobic digester that processes not just her manure, but also organic waste from three local restaurants. Between the renewable natural gas sales and the electricity she’s feeding back to the grid, she earns an additional $85,000 annually.

The whole system cost her $2.1 million, but she’s looking at a seven-year payback, thanks in large part to federal grants and state incentives. “Not bad for something that also happens to be good for the planet,” she said with that practical smile Oregon farmers are known for.

What’s smart about Sarah’s approach is that these sustainability revenue streams help insulate her from milk price swings. When the market’s volatile, she has a stable income from energy sales and premium payments flowing in regardless.

This is no longer a fringe environmental movement. Three-quarters of dairy companies now have formal sustainability strategies, and 84% are actively investing money in them. Programs like Land to Market certification are appearing on retail shelves, commanding premium prices that flow back to producers who can demonstrate their regenerative practices.

Force 5: The Consumer-Crafted Market

The consumer side of this equation is fascinating and, honestly, a little scary if you’re not paying attention.

I was talking to a product development manager from a major processor recently, and she told me something that stuck: “We’re not making products for consumers anymore. Consumers are telling us exactly what products to make.”

Functional dairy is exploding—stuff fortified with probiotics, omega-3s, protein, even ingredients for better sleep and stress management. The organic milk market reached $21.3 billion this year, with 9% growth, while the grass-fed segment is expanding at 7.4% annually.

However, what keeps me awake is that, although the plant-based alternatives segment is slowing, it still represents a substantial $36 billion industry globally. Almond milk alone grabbed 61% of the non-dairy market. That’s not a trend—that’s a structural shift in how younger consumers think about dairy.

The good news? Dairy has something plant-based can’t replicate: biological customization. Imagine being able to adjust cow diets based on real-time consumer health data, naturally boosting specific nutrients in milk. That’s the kind of precision agriculture that meets precision nutrition, which could leave plant-based options in the dust.

Over 90% of Gen Z and Millennial consumers report actively seeking out new flavors and functional benefits. The farms and processors that can deliver on that demand—backed by real dairy’s natural advantages—are the ones that’ll capture market share.

The Big Picture Nobody’s Talking About

Here’s what strikes me as I piece all this together: these aren’t five separate forces. They’re interconnected currents that feed off each other, operating in an environment of constant volatility.

Labor shortages drive automation. Automation generates data. Data enables precision agriculture. Precision agriculture produces higher-value components. Higher-value components require sustainable practices to meet consumer demands. Sustainable practices create new revenue streams that help finance more automation and buffer against price swings.

It’s a virtuous cycle if you can get into it, or a vicious one if you’re stuck on the outside.

The farms that’ll be here in 2030 aren’t necessarily the biggest ones, but they’re the smartest ones—the operations that figured out how to dance with all five of these forces instead of fighting them.

Your Next Steps (The Practical Stuff)

Given this volatile environment where everything’s connected, here’s how to manage the risks while capturing the opportunities:

Master the Volatility Tools: Risk management is no longer optional. Dairy Margin Coverage, futures contracts, forward contracting—farms that aren’t using these tools are essentially gambling with their survival. The beef-on-dairy Strategy has become standard practice for managing both genetics and revenue streams.

30-Day Action Items:

  • Review your DHIA reports and calculate your current component averages
  • Research DMC program options and enrollment deadlines
  • Evaluate your current labor situation and backup plans
  • Connect with your processor about component premiums

90-Day Strategy:

  • Conduct a technology ROI analysis for your operation size
  • Explore sustainability programs available in your region
  • Assess your feed program for component optimization opportunities
  • Develop relationships with agricultural lenders familiar with dairy technology financing

Operation Size Strategies:

For smaller operations (under 200 cows), focus on niche markets where personal relationships and quality premiums are valued. Consider shared services for technology access—cooperative robotic milking is happening in some regions.

For mid-size farms (200-800 cows): This is the danger zone. You need a clear strategy—either scale up to afford the technology or differentiate through specialty products, such as organic or grass-fed.

For larger operations (800+ cows): You’re likely already investing in automation and data systems. The key is maximizing that investment through advanced analytics and component optimization.

The Bottom Line

Every conversation I have these days seems to circle back to the same question: What’s your plan for staying relevant in this new volatility?

Because here’s the truth nobody wants to say out loud—incremental improvements aren’t going to cut it anymore. The gap between leaders and laggards is widening fast, and once you fall behind, catching up gets exponentially harder.

The capital requirements alone for staying competitive are staggering. The knowledge base you need spans everything from data analytics to soil biology to international trade policy. The financial sophistication required would make your banker proud.

But for those who master this dance? The opportunities are enormous. Premium markets, component bonuses, sustainability payments, energy revenues, export opportunities—there’s money to be made in this new world, just not the old ways.

So when we’re grabbing coffee next week at the co-op or the equipment dealer, I’ll be curious to hear your take. Are you riding these waves, or are they washing over you?

From where I sit, the choice is becoming clearer every day. And the window for making that choice is getting smaller.

What’s your biggest challenge with these industry changes? Drop me a line or catch me at the next industry meeting. This conversation is just getting started.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Farm Trends
Tags : , , ,

The Great UK Dairy Cull: What’s Really Driving the Farm Exodus

Saturday, August 16th, 2025

How razor-thin margins, labor costs, and the drive for efficiency are forcing a reckoning in the British dairy industry.

UK dairy industry, dairy farm profitability, feed conversion efficiency, dairy farm consolidation, robotic milking ROI

Here’s what the dairy industry won’t tell you: those 190 UK farms that just quit? They were doing everything ‘right’ according to conventional wisdom—and it still wasn’t enough. Three decades after deregulation, a perfect storm of ruthless margin squeeze and the relentless demand for scale is forcing a harsh reckoning for producers.

The Numbers Tell a Stark Story

UK dairy producer numbers have plummeted from 30,000 in 1994 to just over 7,000 today – a devastating 77% decline following milk market deregulation

The latest data from AHDB’s survey of major milk buyers hits hard. Approximately 190 dairy farms exited the industry in the year ending April 2025, reducing the producer count to about 7,040—a 2.6% decline from the previous year. This marks one of the sharpest contractions in decades.

The sobering detail is that many of these exiting farms weren’t outliers; they were operating around the national average. As detailed in AHDB’s Producer Survey 2024, simply hitting average yields no longer guarantees survival.

The farms that remain are pursuing smarter growth strategies. The 2024 Defra Agricultural Census reports that average herd sizes have increased to approximately 165 cows. These producers balance improved genetics, refined feeding strategies, and the selective adoption of technology to expand without escalating costs.

The Unavoidable Economics of Dairy Farm Scale

Scale is no longer optional—it’s essential. According to Promar International’s UK Dairy Producer Cost Analysis 2025, leading producers sustain production costs between 41 and 43 pence per litre, closely aligned with milk prices, leaving minuscule profit margins.

Smaller farms, especially those managing fewer than 120 cows, face pronounced challenges. The Royal Association of British Dairy Farmers’ 2023 report notes that those hitting better yields can reduce costs by 2 to 4 pence per litre, a crucial buffer given feed prices oscillate between £280 and £320 per tonne.

Feed efficiency is where the real battle is fought. According to AHDB’s 2024 Feed Efficiency Benchmarking, achieving a feed conversion ratio below 0.9 kg dry matter per litre is not optional—it’s a vital survival metric.

Rising UK Dairy Labor Costs Force an Automation Reckoning

Labor costs continue to intensify. The 2024 Arla Foods UK Workforce Survey finds that skilled workers earn between £12 and £14 an hour. These are significant costs that demand a clear return on investment.

Automation can offer relief but carries a high price. Lely’s 2023 Robotic Milking Systems Report places system costs between £150,000 and £180,000, which typically require a herd of 60-70 cows to deliver a meaningful return. Borrowing rates at 6 to 8% further increase the financial risk.

Nevertheless, studies from the University of Reading document robotic milking’s potential to boost yields by 8 to 12 percent with optimized schedules and health monitoring—if margins and cash flow permit.

Market Power: How UK Milk Processors Squeeze Farm Margins

Processor dominance shapes UK dairy profoundly. The UK Competition and Markets Authority’s 2024 Market Power Analysis reveals that four processors control approximately 75 percent of milk procurement, affording them considerable pricing power.

David Harvey, a professor at Newcastle University, notes that processors shift market risks to farmers while maintaining control over retail prices. Despite contract law reforms, the market balance remains skewed.

Two Paths Forward—Neither’s Easy

Producers face two main options: scale aggressively to trim costs or move into premium markets. Organic milk commands higher prices, but premiums vary by certification and region.

Dr. Sarah Jones of Harper Adams University warns growth must be smart—more than just adding cows, it’s about operational agility and economies of scale before costs spiral.

Which route makes sense for your operation? That depends on your current financial position, available capital, and a realistic assessment of local market access. One thing is certain: doing nothing guarantees exit.

What’s Coming Down the Track

Looking ahead, AHDB’s Market Outlook forecasts that the number of viable UK dairy farms will decline below 5,500 by 2030, signaling a consolidation wave that will reshape the industry’s production.

Though inheritance tax grabs headlines, The Conversation’s 2024 analysis clarifies that margin challenges, scale demands, and market consolidation are the true survival factors.

Bottom Line: Your Survival Checklist

Here’s what demands immediate attention:

  • Understand your true costs—calculate exactly what each litre costs to produce and benchmark against industry standards
  • Evaluate your scale honestly—determine whether you’re large enough to capture meaningful efficiencies or need to grow or specialize
  • Manage labor with clear eyes—decide whether you can afford competitive wages or if automation makes financial sense for your herd size
  • Clarify your market access—identify whether you’re limited to commodity pricing or can access premium distribution channels

This is the daily reality farmers face. Those who adapt strategically will continue to thrive years from now.

The right moves on scale, quality, and efficiency are your toolkit. Policy won’t be the safety net.

The consolidation wave is here and accelerating. The only question is whether you’re positioned to ride it—or be swept away.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Hit that 0.9 kg DM/litre feed conversion target, and you’re looking at saving £12+ per cow monthly; start measuring it weekly using your existing feed management software
  • Robotic milking pays off at 60+ cows with 8-12% yield bumps, but run those ROI numbers hard against current 6-8% borrowing rates before you commit
  • Scale economics matter more than ever—farms under 120 cows face 15-20% higher costs; consider partnerships or growth strategies now while credit’s still available
  • Labor costs hit £12-14/hour in the UK (similar pressures here); automate where it makes sense or get creative with efficiency improvements that don’t require new hires
  • Track your margins monthly, not quarterly—use farm management tools to spot trends early because 2025’s market volatility isn’t slowing down anytime soon

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Look, I’ve been digging into these UK farm exits, and here’s what’s really getting me… farms producing at national averages are still going under—that’s not supposed to happen, right? However, here’s the thing: the survivors aren’t just meeting benchmarks; they’re crushing feed efficiency targets, achieving below 0.9 kg DM per litre, and saving 2-4 pence per litre in costs. We’re talking about operations that’ve figured out the automation game too—robotic milking systems boosting yields 8-12% when you’ve got the herd size to justify it. The data from AHDB and similar research shows that it’s not necessarily about getting bigger… It’s about getting smarter with what you have. Those precision feeding tweaks? The genomic testing for better breeding decisions? That’s where the money is. You can’t just coast on “good enough” anymore—the margins won’t let you.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

  • Unlocking Feed Efficiency: The Key to Dairy Profitability – This piece moves from theory to practice, offering actionable strategies to improve your feed conversion ratio. It details specific methods for ration formulation and bunk management that directly translate to lower costs and higher margins, as highlighted in our analysis.
  • The Dairy Business Plan: Your Roadmap to Success – While our article outlines the market pressures, this guide provides the framework for navigating them. It demonstrates how to build a robust business plan to manage risk, secure financing for growth, and make strategic decisions about scaling or specialization.
  • Genomic Testing: Is It Worth the Investment for Your Herd? – Beyond automation, this article explores a key tool for genetic improvement. It reveals how strategic genomic testing can boost herd efficiency, health, and long-term profitability, offering a different pathway to the ‘smarter growth’ our analysis identifies as crucial.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Categories : Dairy Industry
Tags : , , , ,

Why Did Every Dairy Expert Get May Production Dead Wrong? The 1.6% Surge That’s Reshaping American Dairy

Saturday, June 21st, 2025

Don’t believe dairy “experts” anymore. The 1.6% increase in production in May shows that Kansas is beating California. Geographic shifts + tech adoption = survival.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The May 2025 milk production data just exposed a major forecasting failure, and it’s reshaping who wins and loses in American agriculture. While USDA experts predicted production constraints, Kansas delivered a mind-blowing 15.7% increase and Texas posted 8.9% growth, proving that geographic positioning now trumps traditional dairy strongholds like California (down 1.8%). The margin explosion to $11.55 per cwt drove strategic producers to expand aggressively while others waited for “official confirmation” – a $83,220 annual difference for a 500-cow operation facing future margin compression. Stephen Mast’s technology integration generated $32,611 ROI with 6-pound milk increases per cow, while robotic systems deliver 7-year payback versus 15+ years for conventional parlor upgrades. Component optimization using Total Productive Index scoring and genomic testing for fat/protein yields is capturing premium value as markets bifurcate between volume and quality. International competitors face production declines (EU down 0.2%) and climate constraints, creating export opportunities for strategically positioned U.S. operations. The brutal reality: operations lacking scale advantages ($42.70 per cwt for small farms vs. $19.14 for large), technology adoption, and geographic positioning are facing accelerated consolidation as the industry’s DNA fundamentally reshapes itself.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Geographic Disruption Creates 15.7% Production Advantages: Kansas and emerging dairy regions with modern processing infrastructure are capturing market share from traditional strongholds, while California’s 1.8% decline despite larger herds proves legacy advantages are dead – evaluate your processor relationships and shipping distances immediately.
  • Technology ROI Becomes Survival-Critical: Robotic milking systems achieve 7-year payback periods with 15-20% production increases versus 15+ years for conventional upgrades, while automated systems like Stephen Mast’s generated $32,611 annual returns – labor costs at 25% of operating expenses make automation a competitive necessity, not luxury.
  • Component Value Optimization Captures Premium Markets: Total Productive Index breeding programs focusing on butterfat percentage and protein content outperform volume-focused genetics as markets increasingly differentiate product values – operations optimizing for 3.5% fat and 3.2% protein versus 3.2% fat and 3.0% protein capture higher revenue per pound.
  • Scale Economics Accelerate Consolidation: Cost differentials of $23.56 per hundredweight between small and large operations ($42.70 vs. $19.14) combined with projected margin compression to $8.00 per cwt create $83,220 annual viability gaps – strategic positioning decisions in the next 90 days determine decade-long competitive advantages.
  • Global Production Constraints Create Export Windows: EU’s 0.2% production decline due to environmental regulations and China’s reduced import needs shift international trade flows, favoring efficiently positioned U.S. operations with superior cost structures and modern technology platforms over traditional regions clinging to outdated competitive assumptions.
dairy production trends, milk production forecasting, robotic milking ROI, dairy geographic shifts, strategic dairy planning

What happens when an entire industry of forecasters, analysts, and government experts all point in one direction – and the market does the complete opposite? May 2025’s milk production data just delivered a major reality check the U.S. dairy sector, and the implications for your operation are massive.

This analysis is specifically designed for strategic planners in dairy operations who need to understand and respond to fundamental market shifts that will define competitive positioning for the next decade.

The numbers don’t lie, but the experts sure did. While USDA consistently slashed production forecasts from 228.0 billion pounds in December 2024 down to 226.9 billion pounds by February 2025, American dairy farmers delivered a stunning 1.6% production surge that exposed a fundamental disconnect between official predictions and on-farm reality.

Here’s what should really keep you awake tonight: this isn’t just about forecasting failures. This production explosion is fundamentally reshaping the geographic DNA of American dairy, creating massive winners and devastating losers. Are you positioned on the right side of the biggest structural shift we’ve seen in decades, or are you about to get steamrolled by forces you didn’t see coming?

The Great Forecasting Failure: When Academic Models Meet Farm Economics

Let’s challenge the conventional wisdom that drove these catastrophically wrong predictions. The forecasting establishment relied heavily on historical production constraints and disease impact models, completely missing the most powerful force in agriculture: producer response to economic incentives.

According to verified USDA data, total U.S. milk production hit 19.9 billion pounds in May 2025, marking a robust 1.6% increase from May 2024. The 24 major dairy-producing states contributed 19.1 billion pounds, showing an even stronger 1.7% year-over-year growth. This wasn’t a statistical anomaly but a systematic failure of traditional forecasting methods.

The Economic Reality Check

The answer lies in challenging the conventional approach to dairy market analysis. Traditional models overweight historical constraints while underweighting current economic incentives. When March 2025 all-milk prices averaged $22.00 per cwt (up $1.30 year-over-year) while feed costs declined by $0.60 per cwt, the Dairy Margin Coverage farm margin shot to $11.55 per cwt – a stunning $1.90 increase from March 2024.

Strategic Planning Insight for Operations

If the experts got basic production trends this wrong using conventional forecasting methods, what other “established wisdom” might lead your strategic planning astray? The most successful operations are those that trust their economic fundamentals over official projections.

Think of it like this: if you’re managing a 500-cow herd averaging 80 pounds per cow daily, this production surge is equivalent to adding eight more cows to your milking string without increasing your overhead. The forecasters missed the economic signals that were screaming “expand” to producers who understood their income-over-feed cost margins.

The Geographic Revolution: Challenging the “Traditional Dairy Region” Myth

Here’s where we must demolish another piece of conventional wisdom: established dairy regions hold sustainable competitive advantages. The May 2025 data exposes this as dangerous thinking for strategic planners.

The New Powerhouses Disrupting Everything

According to verified USDA data, Kansas posted a mind-blowing 15.7% production increase in May, following a 15.5% surge in April. Texas delivered 8.9% growth, while South Dakota jumped 9.5%. These aren’t traditional dairy strongholds – they’re the new centers of gravity and growing at rates that make traditional regions look stagnant.

Strategic Geographic Analysis

To put Kansas’s growth in perspective: a typical 1,000-cow operation producing 75 pounds per cow daily would need to add 157 cows to achieve that same 15.7% increase. Kansas farmers aren’t just adding cows – they’re building entirely new production systems optimized for efficiency and scale.

Case Study: Stephen Mast’s Technology-Driven Success

A real-world example of strategic positioning comes from Stephen Mast’s operation, which demonstrates the power of technology integration. Mast’s implementation of CowManager technology resulted in:

  • $32,611 total annual return on investment
  • 50% reduction in labor needed for finding cows in heat
  • 20% fewer mastitis cases, 15% less lameness
  • 6-pound increase in milk production per cow
  • $668,000 in added revenue from performance benefits

This case study illustrates how strategic technology adoption enables operations to capture the productivity gains driving geographic shifts.

Traditional Regions: The Decline Nobody Wants to Discuss

California saw a 1.8% decrease despite remaining the largest producer. Illinois dropped 4.0%, Oregon fell 2.3%, and Washington declined 3.3%. This isn’t temporary – it’s a structural decline masked by regional pride and reluctance to acknowledge changing competitive dynamics.

Herd Expansion: The Numbers Tell the Story

May 2025 saw 9.45 million dairy cows, an increase of 114,000 head from May 2024 and the largest U.S. dairy herd since 2021. Production per cow remained modest at 2,110 pounds in May, just 7 pounds above May 2024.

Strategic Decision Framework: Technology Adoption for Competitive Advantage

Labor costs represent approximately 25% of total dairy farm operating costs, yet the dairy industry has been slower to adopt automation compared to other agricultural sectors. This conservative approach is becoming a competitive death sentence for operations lacking strategic vision.

The Robotic Milking Market Reality

According to Cowsmo, the global milking robot market is expected to reach USD $2.61 billion by 2025, with an 11.8% CAGR. More importantly for strategic planners: Cowsmo reports that robotic systems boost milk production because “cows get milked when and as often as they want.”

Strategic Technology Implementation Timeline

Based on verified industry data, here’s your strategic technology adoption framework:

Phase 1: Strategic Assessment (Month 1)

  • Evaluate current labor costs (averaging $0.25-$1.00 per hundredweight for conventional parlors)
  • Calculate ROI potential: Systems typically achieve payback in 7 years vs. 15+ years for conventional parlor upgrades
  • Assess facility requirements for optimal implementation

Phase 2: Investment Analysis (Month 2)

  • Budget allocation: Systems typically cost $200,000-$300,000 per robotic unit
  • Labor efficiency gains: Target 2.2 million pounds per full-time worker vs. 1.5 million pounds in conventional parlors
  • Production increase potential: 15-20% increase compared to conventional milking

Phase 3: Implementation Strategy (Month 3)

  • Integration with existing management systems
  • Training protocols for transition management
  • Performance monitoring systems establishment

Strategic Competitive Positioning Assessment Tool

Use this framework to evaluate your operation’s competitive positioning:

Immediate Strategic Assessment Checklist

Cost Structure Analysis:
□ Current cost per hundredweight vs. industry benchmark ($19.14 for large operations)
□ Labor efficiency: pounds of milk per full-time worker equivalent
□ Technology adoption level compared to regional competitors

Market Position Evaluation:
□ Geographic advantages: distance to processing facilities
□ Component production focus: butterfat and protein optimization
□ Quality metrics: current SCC levels vs. target <200,000

Future Readiness Indicators:
□ Capital investment capacity for technology upgrades
□ Management systems integration capability
□ Strategic partnerships with processors and suppliers

Strategic Decision Matrix

FactorCurrent PositionTarget PositionAction RequiredTimeline
Cost/cwt$ ___$19.14 benchmarkTechnology/scale12-24 months
Labor efficiency___ lbs/worker2.2M lbs/workerAutomation6-18 months
SCC levels___<200,000Management/genetics3-12 months
Geographic positionMiles to processor: ___<50 miles optimalEvaluate alternativesImmediate

Market Dynamics: Component Value Revolution with Global Context

The May 2025 market reaction revealed sophisticated pricing dynamics that reward strategic thinking over simple production maximization. Consumer demand for all kinds of dairy products is up, creating opportunities for strategically positioned operations.

The Bifurcated Market Reality

The market is increasingly differentiating between products, with butter, cheese, NDM, and whey price forecasts raised on recent prices and increased export demand. This bifurcation creates clear strategic opportunities for operations that optimize for component production rather than volume.

Global Competitive Context for Strategic Planning

EU milk production is forecast to decline by 0.2% to 149.4 million metric tons in 2025, driven by environmental regulations. This creates export opportunities for efficiently positioned U.S. operations.

Labor Crisis: The Strategic Imperative for Automation

Half of dairy farm workers are immigrants; without them, retail milk prices would double while one in four dairy farms would shut down. This isn’t just a labor issue – it’s a strategic competitive factor.

Strategic Response Framework

Adopting strategic automation, progressive operations leverage the labor crisis as a competitive advantage. Technology can help farmers in many aspects on the farm, and the farmers who can capitalize on the value of the data will have a competitive advantage in the future.

The Scale Economics Reality: Strategic Positioning Requirements

According to verified USDA Economic Research Service data, average total cost per 100 pounds of milk is $42.70 for herds under 50 cows versus $19.14 for farms with 2,000+ cows. This isn’t just about size – it’s about strategic positioning for long-term viability.

Strategic Response Options for Different Operation Sizes

Based on verified performance data, operations have three viable strategic paths:

  1. Scale-Up Strategy: Dramatic expansion through consolidation or partnerships
  2. Premium Market Strategy: Specialization in high-value market segments
  3. Strategic Exit: Timely divestiture while asset values remain strong

Global Market Strategic Context

EU cheese production is forecast to remain the primary output goal, supported by solid domestic consumption and export demand. This creates specific opportunities for U.S. operations positioned to compete in cheese markets.

Strategic International Positioning

Understanding global production constraints enables strategic positioning:

  • EU production decline creates export opportunities
  • New Zealand’s focus on efficiency over volume models strategic approaches
  • China’s reduced import needs shift global trade flows

The Bottom Line: Strategic Positioning for the New Dairy Reality

The May 2025 production surge isn’t just about higher milk output – it’s proof that dairy markets respond faster and more dramatically to economic incentives than conventional wisdom suggests. For strategic planners, this reveals fundamental truths about competitive positioning.

The Four Strategic Imperatives

First, economic fundamentals drive expansion decisions. When margins hit $11.55 per cwt, producers expand regardless of expert predictions. Strategic planners must build decision frameworks based on economic indicators, not forecasts.

Second, geographic positioning determines long-term viability. The states showing explosive growth have modern infrastructure, favorable regulations, and strategic processing investments. Regional loyalty won’t overcome structural economic disadvantages.

Third, technology adoption with measurable ROI is becoming survival-critical. With documented 7-year payback periods for robotic systems versus 15+ years for conventional upgrades, automation transforms from efficiency gain to competitive necessity.

Fourth, component optimization drives premium capture. Operations using Total Productive Index (TPI)-guided breeding programs for butterfat and protein content will outperform volume-focused approaches.

Your Strategic Action Framework

Here’s your immediate 90-day strategic positioning framework:

Month 1: Competitive Intelligence

  • Benchmark your cost per hundredweight against the $19.14 target for efficient operations
  • Assess current SCC levels with a target below 200,000 for premium positioning
  • Evaluate technology adoption levels versus regional competitors

Month 2: Strategic Investment Analysis

  • Calculate ROI for automation technologies with 7-year payback targets
  • Assess processing plant relationships and geographic positioning
  • Evaluate component production optimization potential

Month 3: Implementation Planning

  • Develop a technology integration timeline with specific performance targets
  • Establish strategic partnerships for scale or specialization advantages
  • Create monitoring systems for continuous competitive assessment

Strategic Decision Point

The dairy industry just proved that conventional wisdom can be spectacularly wrong about fundamental market dynamics. Strategic planners who understand this reality and position accordingly will capture market share from those clinging to outdated assumptions.

The question isn’t whether change is coming – May’s production data proves it’s already here. The question is whether your strategic planning framework is prepared to capitalize on the opportunities this transformation creates while others struggle to adapt.

Your Next Strategic Move

Implement this assessment framework immediately: Evaluate your operation against the top quartile in your region on cost per hundredweight, technology adoption, and component optimization. If you’re not competitive on at least two of these strategic factors, develop repositioning plans within 60 days.

The geographic and technological shifts we’ve analyzed aren’t slowing down – they’re accelerating. Strategic planners who act on verified economic signals rather than conventional forecasting wisdom will define the winners and losers in American dairy’s next chapter.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Dairy Markets, USDA Dairy Production Report
Tags : , , ,

Unlocking Dairy Robot Financing: How Smart Farmers Are Funding Their Automated Future

Friday, April 4th, 2025

Losing $500/day without dairy robots? Discover financing hacks boosting milk yields 9% & slashing labor 28%—before your herd falls behind.

Have you been eyeing those sleek robotic milking systems but can’t figure out how to make the numbers work? You’re not alone. I’ve been talking with dairy farmers across the country who wrestle with the same question: How do you justify dropping $200,000+ per robot when the bank’s giving you that skeptical side-eye?

But here’s the thing—the financing landscape has completely changed in the last few years. Remember when robots were just for those who had lots of money and cash on hand? Not anymore. Let me walk you through what I’ve discovered about making these systems work financially, even for operations that don’t have money trees growing out back.

The Real Deal on Robot ROI

Let’s cut to the chase – robotic milking isn’t cheap. We’re looking at $150,000 to $230,000 per robot, each unit handling about 60 cows. That’s a gut punch when you first see the numbers.

But you know what’s fascinating? The cost trend is moving in our favor. In 2004, you’d pay around $250,000 for a single robot. By 2010, that dropped to $220,000—a 12% decrease. At the same time, labor costs jumped by 12%. See where this is going? The economic equation improves yearly as tech costs fall and labor expenses climb.

I was shocked when I dug into the performance numbers. Check this out:

Economic FactorPercent Change with RMS (%)
Milk yield+8.66
Investment cost+58.46
Energy consumption+36.66
Feed costs+1.33
Labor input-27.84

Look at that feed cost number! Only a 1.33% increase for almost 9% more milk? That’s practically stealing! And cutting labor by nearly 28%? In today’s “nobody wants to work” environment, that’s gold.

A Wisconsin dairy producer, Dave Kammel, said, “Two robots have milked my 105ish cows for the last 7 years, the best investment I’ve ever made. It saves about 3 hours of labor a day compared to the parlor.” Can you imagine what you’d do with an extra three hours daily?

Creative Money Moves That Work

Here’s where it gets interesting. The manufacturers aren’t stupid – they know these systems are expensive. That’s why they’ve gotten creative with financing.

Lely partnered with DLL Finance to create specialized financing packages. Between you and me, they occasionally run sweet promotional deals—I’ve seen 0% financing for 60 months offered to new clients. GEA does something similar with its blue robots, offering terms of up to 84 months.

“We’ve worked together for nearly 20 years,” said Juli Nunnikhoven, Business Development Manager of DLL. “That’s something I don’t think other people realize. We were one of the first companies to finance robots.”

But have you heard about leasing options? This is my favorite hack for farms with tight capital. Industry experts say leasing can slash your initial requirements by 15-25%. I talked to a Wisconsin family who put just $30,000 down on a $200,000 system through an operating lease. Their monthly payments run about $3,800 over a 7-year term—manageable with the production increases they’re seeing.

And here’s something wild – the “pay-per-liter” model. Instead of fixed payments, you pay based on what you produce. It started in Europe (those folks are always ahead of us), but it’s coming to North America. Think about it – your payments flex with your production. Brilliant for that awkward transition period when your cows are still figuring out this strange robot thing!

Matt Lyne, a DLL customer who recently integrated Lely robots on his Southwest Victoria dairy farm, reflected on his experience: “Through exploring various financing options, including leasing, I found a viable solution that aligned with my business goals and financial capabilities.” For newcomers like Matt who lacked extensive financial history in the dairy sector, Lely Finance took a comprehensive approach, considering existing farm assets, previous experience, and growth projections.

The Environmental Edge You Weren’t Expecting

Did you know robotic milking can dramatically slash your farm’s carbon footprint? This was a real eye-opener for me.

A Devon dairy farmer in the UK who switched to robots saw his farm’s carbon footprint drop from 1,369 g/liter to 1,204 g/liter after just one year. That’s the equivalent of 13 fewer flights around the world! And when he first started measuring in 2011, it was even higher at 1,729 g/liter.

The efficiency gains come from multiple angles. His milk yields jumped 30% (from 5,700 to 8,198 liters per cow per year) while maintaining similar feed rates at around 0.34 kg/liter. As one farmer explained to University of Waterloo researchers, robots allow you to “fill more kilograms of milking quota with fewer cows… you’re milking fewer cows, you’re feeding fewer cows, you’re breeding fewer cows, you have less manure, you use less acreage.”

Some systems even run on batteries that use less electricity, and farmers working with nutrient management planners report being able to use smaller manure pits due to more efficient resource usage. When you think about the push for sustainability in agriculture, this is a significant competitive advantage that goes beyond just the financial benefits.

From “Meh” to “OMG” – Performance Matters

Want to know the craziest thing I’ve learned? The difference between average and excellent robot performance is worth about $500 per robot per day. PER DAY! That’s not a typo.

Look at these numbers:

Efficiency MetricLower Efficiency FarmHigher Efficiency FarmDifference
Milk per minute1.40 kg2.00 kg+42.9%
Daily production potential (1,180 minutes)1,650 kg2,360 kg+710 kg
Estimated daily revenue difference–+$500–
Annual profit potential difference–+$160,600–

I spit out my drink when I saw that annual difference figure. $160,600 per year? Just from managing the same hardware better? That’s a whole farm payment right there!

The production responses from farmers who switch to robots are mind-blowing. Minnesota research shows a 9.3% milk production bump compared to conventional parlors. Iowa studies found a 12% increase. And get this—some New Zealand producers reported milk solids increase up to 50%! I’m not saying you’ll see those exact numbers, but the trend is crystal clear.

Studies consistently show milk yields can rise by 5-10% after switching to robotic milking systems, with some farms seeing increases from 7,000 to 9,000 liters per cow annually. This improved production, combined with better milk quality fetching higher prices, creates a compelling economic case.

The Cow Health Revolution Nobody’s Talking About

One of the most surprising benefits I’ve discovered is how much healthier cows are in robotic systems. That Devon farmer I mentioned earlier? His use of intramammary tubes per cow dropped from 1.83 to 1.02 a year after installing robots. His conception rate jumped from 32% to 42%, and his calving interval shrunk from 427 days to 401 days.

According to the March 2024 University of Waterloo case study, this happens because the cows choose when to be milked, which reduces stress. Real-time monitoring through computer vision and sensors helps detect health problems earlier. One tech company representative remarked, “So cows will live longer… It’s healthier for cows, as they get milked more often. They’re under less stress. When you’re in a holding pen being pushed into a parlor, there’s much more stress there.”

That same rep noted you can see the difference when you walk into a barn with robots: “The cows are quiet and much calmer, subdued. They’re almost pets in some ways. They’ll come up to you and start licking your coat… But in a parlor environment, when you walk in the barn, they scatter because every time you go into the barn, they typically think, hey, they’re coming in to get me.”

The health benefits translate directly to financial gains through reduced veterinary costs, better reproductive performance, and longer productive lifespans. It’s a win-win for both animal welfare and your bottom line.

Real Talk: When Robots Don’t Deliver

I wouldn’t be doing you any favors if I only shared the sunshine and rainbows. Let’s talk about when things go sideways.

One former robotic dairy farmer shared with us that he installed robots in 2007, hoping for all the typical benefits – more milk, less labor, you know, the drill. But as he candidly told me, “Over the 12, almost 13 years we had robots, we achieved none of those.” Ouch.

He calculated those robots increased his costs by 4.5 cents per liter for maintenance and another 2.5 cents per liter on purchased feed. His labor costs remained unchanged from his old double-six parlor. When he finally switched to a DeLaval Rotary Parlour in 2020, his production jumped 30%.

He admitted, “We probably had some early versions of the technology, and there were growing pains. I’m fully willing to take the blame. I don’t think it’s the technology. In the end, I think I was probably the problem.”

This is why implementation strategy matters so much. You can’t just drop robots in your barn and expect magic. Each farm is unique, and successful robot implementation requires thorough planning, proper training, and commitment to adjusting management practices. The investment in robotics extends beyond the hardware to include the necessary expertise to optimize system performance.

The Adoption Explosion You Need to Know About

The shift to robots is happening faster than you might think. According to University of Waterloo research published in March 2024, between 2016 and 2021, the number of farms using dairy robotics in Ontario alone more than doubled from 337 to 715 farms. The livestock sector is now leading robotics adoption in Canadian agriculture.

The global market hit $2.98 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach $3.39 billion this year – that’s a 14% jump in a single year! By 2029, we’re looking at $6.03 billion. That’s not just growth; that’s an explosion.

What blows my mind is that in Denmark, more than 85% of all new dairy facilities now install robotic milking systems. Eighty-five percent! Meanwhile, here in North America, a National Dairy FARM Program survey found only 3% of operations currently use robotic systems, compared to 45.4% still using tie-stalls.

Does that spell opportunity to you? Because it screams it to me. The early adopters will have a competitive advantage as this wave inevitably hits our shores in full force.

Case studies demonstrate the transformative potential. The Hinchley Dairy Farm in the U.S. faced labor shortages and high costs before installing Lely robots for tasks like milking and feeding, resulting in a significant 10% boost in milk production. The Elliot Family Farm uses 20 DeLaval milking robots, which cut labor costs and increase milk production by 10%. These success stories highlight how automation is helping family farms overcome challenges and thrive in today’s competitive environment.

Managing the Transition Period

Here’s something most salespeople won’t tell you: implementing dairy robotics may require a transition period of up to four years to achieve profitability. That’s right – four years.

This isn’t to scare you off, but you must plan your financing accordingly. The upfront capital for barn retrofits and infrastructure upgrades can be substantial. As one tech company representative explained, “I would say the biggest challenge is adopting these technologies in Ontario, especially in Ontario and Quebec; I would say, would be a lot of the dairy farms, not a lot, but a good chunk of them still are tie stalls… a tie stall is a smaller footprint, and that takes a bit more of a work to retrofit a robot in or would require a whole new barn altogether.”

The good news is these upgrades benefit the regional economy too: “So the barn builders, the engineers, the designers, all of the various pieces that go along with bringing that in… It’s usually incorporated in an entirely new build or certainly a significant renovation. So, there’s a whole piece that comes along supporting that.”

Juli Nunnikhoven from DLL recommends starting the process as early as possible: “It’s never too early to talk about what options are available. It’s good to have a game plan so when they’re ready to pull the trigger, they know exactly what they want to do.” Many operators, particularly larger dairies, may begin exploring financing options two years or more before any construction is expected.

Let’s Make This Happen

If you’re still waiting for the “perfect time” to explore robots, I’ve got news for you – you’re leaving serious money on the table every month you delay. With technology costs dropping and labor expenses climbing, the financial equation gets more compelling every year.

I love what a dairy farmer from Ontario told me about his phased approach: “Our first-stage implementation involved two robots serving 110 cows. This allowed us to master the technology and operational protocols before expanding to our current six-robot system serving 360 cows.” Starting small is brilliant – it lets you learn the ropes while limiting initial capital requirements.

Alex Hucker Stewart from DLL emphasizes the importance of understanding and overcoming the initial investment hurdle, highlighting Lely Finance’s role in making these technologies more accessible through structured financing options. Their approach to tailoring repayment structures to align with each farm’s cash flow demonstrates their commitment to supporting farmers through seasonal fluctuations and varying circumstances.

Look, I’m not saying robotic milking is right for every farm. But if you plan to be in dairy for the long haul, this isn’t some optional fancy toy – it’s quickly becoming an essential strategic investment. With the creative financing options available today, those capital hurdles aren’t nearly as intimidating as they once were.

The dairy robot revolution isn’t some distant future event – it’s happening right now, all around us. The only question is whether you’ll be leading the charge or playing catch-up down the road. What do you think? Is it time to seriously explore your robot financing options?

I’d love to hear your thoughts on this! Are you considering robots for your operation? Have you already taken the leap? Drop me a line, and let’s keep the conversation going. The coffee’s on me next time!

The Bottom Line

The dairy industry is experiencing a technological revolution through robotic milking systems that increase milk production by 8.66% while reducing labor requirements by 27.84%. Yet, adoption remains low at just 3% of North American operations compared to 85% of new facilities in Denmark. Creative financing approaches—including manufacturer-backed programs, leasing arrangements, and pay-per-liter models—are making this technology increasingly accessible to operations of all sizes despite the substantial upfront costs of $150,000-$230,000 per unit.

Optimizing robot performance can generate an additional $500 daily revenue per robot when compared to lower-efficiency operations, transforming what might be an underperforming investment into a highly profitable one. Beyond financial benefits, robotic systems deliver environmental advantages through reduced carbon footprint and improved cow health outcomes, including better conception rates and reduced antibiotic use. Strategic implementation planning is essential, with a transition period of up to four years to achieve full profitability. However, the long-term advantages make robotic milking an increasingly critical investment for forward-thinking dairy operations.

Key Takeaways

  • ROI Game-Changer: Top-performing robots generate $500/day more revenue than poorly managed units—$160,600 annual upside per machine.
  • Creative Financing: Leases slash upfront costs ($30k down vs. $200k purchase), while pay-per-liter models align payments with milk output.
  • Sustainability Edge: Robots cut carbon footprints from 1,729g to 1,204g/liter and reduce antibiotic use by 44% through healthier herds.
  • Adoption Surge: Global market will double to $6.03B by 2029, yet 45% of North American farms still use tie-stalls versus 715 robot-equipped Ontario operations.
  • Implementation Reality: Phased rollouts (1–2 robots initially) and 4-year profitability timelines prevent costly missteps during barn upgrades.

Executive Summary

Robotic milking systems are revolutionizing dairy farming, delivering 8.66% higher milk yields and 27.84% labor savings despite upfront costs of 0,000–0,000 per unit. Innovative financing models—including 0% manufacturer promotions, leasing (reducing capital outlays by 15–25%), and pay-per-liter programs—are making automation accessible to farms of all sizes. Early adopters gain competitive advantages through sustainability wins (carbon footprint reductions of 30%) and healthier herds (42% conception rates vs. 32% in parlors). While adoption is exploding globally (85% of new Danish dairies use robots), North American farms lag at 3% penetration—creating urgent opportunities. Strategic implementation requires 4-year transition plans but unlocks $160,600 annual profit potential per optimized robot.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Robotic Milking
Tags : , , ,

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Overlays

Send this to a friend