Archive for FMMO milk pricing

The Export Paradox: 1,168% Growth and a $54,750 Hole in Your 2026 Milk Check

January exports hit a record 12% jump. Your milk check rose 4%. That $0.40/cwt gap isn’t abstract — on 500 cows, it’s $54,750 a year walking out the door.

Executive Summary: U.S. dairy exports shattered records in early 2026 — January volume up 12%, February cheese at an all-time 58,406 MT — but the gap between what the world pays and what hits your mailbox keeps widening. ADC estimates the all-milk-to-mailbox spread has grown roughly $0.40/cwt since the FMMO make-allowance changes took effect; on a 500-cow herd, that’s about $54,750 a year not reaching the bulk tank. NFDM hit $2.06/lb on April 9 — highest since January 2014 — as protein gets pulled into yogurt, UF milk, and high-margin whey instead of dryers. Mexico and Canada account for 44% of U.S. dairy export value ($3.6 billion), and the USMCA formal review is set for July, with Canada’s quota system still unresolved. The full article walks through the barn math on both sides of that gap, lays out 30- and 90-day checks you can run against your own numbers, and flags the corridor and contract risks that could move your check before year-end.

U.S. dairy exports
Becky Nyman, fourth-generation dairy farmer and USDEC chair, at Nyman Dairy Farm’s 1,200-cow operation in Hilmar, California. Nearly 1 in 5 pounds of U.S. milk now leaves the country — and Nyman’s fighting to make sure the value reaches the farms that produce it.

In January 2026, U.S. dairy export volume jumped 12% year‑over‑year on a milk solids equivalent basis — the biggest January ever recorded, according to USDEC data released March 12. February was even stronger: cheese exports hit an all‑time monthly high of 58,406 metric tons, 30% above last year and 6% above the previous record set in November 2025. 

That’s nine straight months of year‑over‑year volume growth — with the most recent four all in double digits. By any measure, the world wants more American dairy than at any point in history. Yet while January volume climbed 12%, export value rose just 4% — to $740 million — and February’s value, at an estimated $804 million, was “only” up 11%

At the same time, the gap between your all‑milk price and what actually shows up in the mailbox has widened. According to the American Dairy Coalition (ADC) — a producer advocacy group tracking FMMO pricing impacts — that spread has averaged roughly $1.00/cwt since the 2025 make‑allowance changes, up from what ADC calculates as a ~$0.60 baseline. The export boom is real. Whether it’s reaching your bulk tank is a different equation entirely. 

The spread isn’t static, though. USDA data showed it at $0.85/cwt in September 2025, and Progressive Dairy reported ~$0.96/cwt in January 2024 — before the FMMO amendments took effect. The gap varies by month, marketing order, and class utilization. ADC’s $0.60 baseline represents their chosen reference period, not a fixed historical average. The direction is real. The exact magnitude depends on where you sit. 

What Did 30 Years of USDEC Actually Buy Your Herd?

In 1995, U.S. dairy was playing defense — worried about cheap Oceania imports, leaning on domestic price supports, skeptical that Americans could compete globally. Then, a handful of stakeholders created the U.S. Dairy Export Council with checkoff funding. That bet paid off beyond anyone’s projections. 

Here’s how the scoreboard reads:

  • 1995 export value: $656 million (per USDEC) 
  • 2024 export value: $8.32 billion — a 1,168% increase from the 1995 baseline (per USDEC’s 30th‑anniversary accounting; USDA FAS reports $8.2 billion for the same period — the gap likely reflects product‑scope differences) 
  • 2025 export value: $9.63 billion — a 15% jump over 2024 (per USDEC press release, February 24, 2026) 
  • 1995 share of U.S. milk production exported: a small fraction of total production, per USDA/ERS 
  • 2025 share of U.S. milk production exported: nearly 20% (per USDEC) 
  • 2025 MSE volume: 2.32 million metric tons — second‑highest on record, behind 2022’s 2.41 million MT 

“We’ve gone from a minor player to a leading global supplier,” says USDEC president and CEO Krysta Harden, per the organization’s 30th‑anniversary blog. “We’re now positioned to become the No. 1 global exporter of dairy products.” 

Nearly 1 in 5 pounds of U.S. milk now leaves the country. For a 500‑cow herd shipping 75 lb/cow/day, roughly 100 cows’ worth of your production depends on buyers in Mexico City, Jakarta, or Riyadh. 

If you don’t think of yourself as an exporter, the math says otherwise.

The Export Boom vs. Your Milk Check

The headline numbers tell a story of historic growth. But the question that matters to your operation is simpler: Is any of this actually reaching your mailbox?

MetricPre-Amendment (Before June 2025)Post-Amendment (June 2025–Present)Direction
U.S. Dairy Export Value$8.32B (2024)$9.63B (2025)↑ +15%
All-Milk to Mailbox Spread~$0.60/cwt (ADC baseline)~$1.00/cwt (ADC avg)<span style=”color:red”>↑ Widened $0.40/cwt</span>
Processor Gross MarginsBaseline+26% to +39% (ADC est.)<span style=”color:red”>↑ Processors gaining</span>
Minimum Milk Values to FarmersBaselineDown ~5% (ADC est.)<span style=”color:red”>↓ Farmers losing</span>
Annual Impact (500-cow herd)−$54,750/yr from widening alone<span style=”color:red”>Cash leaving the tank</span>
NFDM Spot Price~$1.20–$1.42/lb (late 2025)$2.06/lb (April 9, 2026)↑ 12-year high
Feb 2026 Cheese Exports44,928 MT (Feb 2025)58,406 MT (all-time record)↑ +30% YoY
New Processing Capacity$11B into 53 facilities (2025–2028)↑ IDFA pipeline

*The 1,368% figure measures 1995→2025. USDEC’s 30th‑anniversary figure of 1,168% uses the 2024 endpoint of $8.32B.

USDA AMS began consistently tracking mailbox prices in the mid‑1990s, but pre‑amendment spread data is volatile by month and order. ADC’s ~$0.60 baseline is their reference; USDA data shows the spread was already around $0.85–$0.96 at various points before the amendments. The growth in exports is staggering. But the growth in the gap between your gross price and your net check deserves equal attention. 

Make Allowance — In Plain English
The make allowance is the credit built into FMMO pricing formulas that covers processors’ costs of turning raw milk into cheese, butter, powder, or whey. When USDA raises the make allowance, your minimum regulated price drops — even if the retail or export price of cheese doesn’t change. Think of it as the toll between your bulk tank and the marketplace. In 2025, that toll got significantly more expensive. 

The $0.40/cwt Question: Who’s Capturing the Export Gains?

Record volumes should mean a better check. So why doesn’t it feel that way?

The volume–value gap in January isn’t a mystery — it’s a trailing indicator. Falling U.S. cheese and butter prices in Q4 2025 dragged down the value of shipments contracted months earlier. February’s 11% value jump shows the market correcting. But the real disconnect is domestic, not global. 

Following the 2025 FMMO amendments — which took effect June 1 and December 31, 2025 — make allowances climbed across products in line with USDA’s final decision. Analysts estimate the aggregate impact on the milk check at about $5.04/cwt when you sum the per‑pound changes across butter, cheese, NFDM, and dry whey. ADC’s analysis of the first eight months under the new rules estimates that processor gross margins increased 26% to 39% and minimum milk values paid to farmers dropped approximately 5% — figures ADC derived from USDA pricing data, though the methodology hasn’t been independently audited. IDFA has not publicly disputed or confirmed ADC’s calculations. 

IDFA supported the increase, noting the rates hadn’t been adjusted since the last FMMO hearing process in 2007–2008. And there’s a reason processors pushed hard for it: IDFA president and CEO Michael Dykes told Dairy Herd and other outlets that more than $11 billion is flowing into 53 new or expanded dairy manufacturing facilities across 19 states, slated to come online between 2025 and 2028. These are the plants physically creating the export products, driving the boom. Without that investment, the boom doesn’t exist. 

ADC’s counterargument: farmers shouldn’t be subsidizing those plants through formula deductions that widen the gap between the all‑milk price and the mailbox — a gap that, ADC argues, many producers don’t fully see when they look at their checks. Both sides have a point. The question is where the line sits — and right now, it’s moving in one direction. 

What Does a $0.40/cwt Increase Look Like on a 500‑Cow Herd?

Becky Nyman — a fourth‑generation dairy farmer from Hilmar, California, and chair of the USDEC board — doesn’t sugarcoat the stakes. “Trade creates opportunities for farmers to stay on the farm,” she said at the 2026 USDEC Annual Membership Meeting. “With 96% of the global population living outside our borders, the opportunity to grow is immense.” 

But Nyman is equally clear that exports aren’t charity. They’re the foundation of the modern milk check. And that foundation only works if the pricing system actually delivers those gains to the parlor — not just to the plants. 

For any producer who runs their own barn math against ADC’s numbers, there’s a legitimate question: how much of the export boom is actually reaching the milk check that funds next month’s feed bill?

ADC calculates that the all‑milk‑to‑mailbox gap has widened by about $0.40/cwt since the FMMO changes took effect. Again, the baseline varies by source and timeframe, but the direction of widening is consistent across the data. 

THE $54,750 QUESTION — Barn Math for a 500‑Cow Herd

  • Herd size: 500 cows
  • Shipped per cow per day: 75 lb (adjusted for dry cows, culls)
  • Daily cwt shipped: 500 × 75 = 37,500 lb = 375 cwt/day
  • The $0.40/cwt increase (post‑FMMO amendment, per ADC):
    375 cwt × $0.40 = $150/day → $54,750/year
  • The full $1.00/cwt gap (total all‑milk to mailbox spread, ADC post‑amendment avg):
    375 cwt × $1.00 = $375/day → $136,875/year

The $0.40 figure represents ADC’s estimated increase since the FMMO amendments were enacted. The $1.00 figure is ADC’s total gap estimate, including deductions that were in place before. Which number fits your operation depends on your marketing order, class utilization, and co‑op pool distribution. Plug in your own herd size and shipped volume. 

Picture a 500‑cow Central Valley operation sitting down with its lender this spring. That $54,750 isn’t theoretical — it’s the difference between a line‑of‑credit buffer and a conversation nobody wants to have in July. And the lender’s looking at the same export headlines you are, wondering why the check doesn’t match the story.

For a 1,500‑cow Western operation shipping 85 lb/cow/day, scale accordingly: the $0.40 increase alone runs roughly $186,000 per year. Under ADC’s numbers, that’s money that’s no longer showing up in the mailbox.

How the Fat Boom and Protein Craze Change What Your Processor Wants

Two structural trends are reshaping what the world buys from U.S. dairy — and both land differently depending on your components and your processor’s export mix.

The fat boom. U.S. herds hit record butterfat levels in 2025, with total butter production up and inventories initially swelling. That surge helped push butter prices below $1.50/lb in late 2025, but aggressive exports helped clear the surplus. By late February 2026, butter inventories stood at 253.8 million pounds — down 17% from a year earlier, per the USDA Cold Storage report released March 24. 

The tighter supply triggered a brief spot‑price spike above $2.10/lb on March 2, driven partly by “new crop” trade rules limiting eligible inventory. But butter has since settled back into the $1.73–$1.82 range as of early April. 

For Central Valley operations — where butterfat tests typically run above the national average and processors export heavily to Mexico and Asia — more fat is a double‑edged dynamic. Nyman’s Hilmar operation sits in the middle of that corridor. Higher demand for what those herds produce, but tighter competition for the processing capacity to turn it into exportable products. 

The protein craze. High‑quality whey proteins and milk protein isolates are getting pulled out of traditional spray dryers and into high‑margin products: Greek yogurt, cottage cheese, ultrafiltered milk, and protein‑enriched drinks. USDEC data indicate that high‑protein whey exports set a record in 2025 and remained strong into the new year. 

The protein pull has a flip side. Nonfat dry milk production has dropped, and the squeeze is showing in prices.

The $2.06 signal: CME spot NFDM hit $2.06/lb on April 9 — the highest level since January 2014, when it traded at $2.075. NFDM briefly topped $2.00 in mid‑2022 but never reached the current level. U.S. powder has been trading at a significant premium to both Oceania and European SMP, with many Asian bids running below domestic CME NFDM prices — often by a single‑digit cents‑per‑pound discount, as trade analysts note. 

That premium reflects a successful value‑chain pivot. It also prices U.S. suppliers out of cost‑sensitive markets in Southeast Asia and Africa — the exact regions where the long‑term volume growth lives. 

If your co‑op’s protein premium has moved meaningfully since 2023, it’s worth revisiting how you’re feeding for protein — not just fat. The market’s telling you which component it’ll pay up for. 

Where Does 27% of Your Export Revenue Go — and What Could Disrupt It?

Mexico remains the No. 1 destination for American dairy, accounting for roughly a quarter of total export value in recent years and about $2.5–$2.6 billion in 2025, based on USDEC country‑level tracking and USDA trade data. Fresh cheese volumes to Mexico nearly tripled in February 2026, and total cheese shipments were up 38%. Proximity, rail logistics, and decades of partnership between USDEC, NMPF, and Mexican dairy organizations make this corridor remarkably durable. 

The Middle East is surging, too. According to USDEC trade data, butter shipments to MENA jumped dramatically in February, and total MSE volume to the region climbed sharply in the first two months of 2026. Southeast Asia continues to grow — NFDM/SMP shipments to the region rose significantly in January, and the U.S. Center for Dairy Excellence in Singapore, launched in 2019, has become a critical bridge connecting American suppliers with Asian customers through its sensory labs and demo kitchens. 

In Indonesia, the government’s Free and Nutritious School Meals initiative is being rolled out to tens of millions of students and other vulnerable groups, with Rabobank estimating it could eventually serve around 83 million recipientsand require more than 2 billion liters of milk annually at full implementation. Indonesia currently relies on imports for more than 80% of its dairy supply, according to USDEC and Agri‑Pulse reporting. 

USDEC, NMPF, and the Consortium for Common Food Names are leaning into that gap. In April 2025, U.S. and Indonesian officials signed a landmark dairy agreement that set a framework to boost dairy trade and support public nutrition, complementing joint work on the school meals program. In February 2026, the U.S. and Indonesia signed a new agreement that eliminates tariffs on all U.S. dairy exports, recognizes U.S. regulatory oversight, and commits to protecting common cheese names — explicitly building on the U.S.–Indonesia Dairy Partnership launched in 2024 and joint work on the Free and Nutritious School Meals initiative. 

Nyman knows what it takes to build that access. As she shared, a high‑level trip to China brought her into a Ministry of Commerce meeting where trade barriers dominated the conversation. She chose to speak as a producer first — about community, about how dairy farmers worldwide share more in common than divides them. The minister, she recalled, used her words to find common ground. 

That kind of moment doesn’t show up in USDEC’s export spreadsheets. But it’s part of why those spreadsheets keep growing.

The July risk: U.S. dairy exports to Mexico and Canada exceeded $3.6 billion last year, accounting for 44% of total export value, according to USDEC and NMPF. The USMCA formal review is set for July 2026, with Canada’s quota system and tariff dynamics still unresolved. If Mexico’s corridor were disrupted by even 10–15%, the impact on pool prices would ripple well beyond the co‑ops that ship directly south of the border. For operations that depend heavily on Class III and IV utilization, even a modest shock in the Mexico corridor can show up as a meaningful hit to pool values and basis — especially stacked on top of already‑wider make allowances. 

If more than a third of your plant’s volume goes to Mexico or Canada, that July review is a contract‑risk date, not just a policy headline.

What This Means for Your Operation

In the next 30 days:

  • Pull your last 12 milk checks. Calculate the effective gap between your all‑milk price and your mailbox price, month by month. Compare Q1 2026 to Q1 2025. Don’t guess — run the numbers.
  • If the gap has widened more than $0.50/cwt since mid‑2025, bring that number — not a complaint, the actual calculation — to your next co‑op meeting or processor conversation. If it hasn’t widened, your marketing order and class utilization may be buffering you, but know that the next FMMO hearing cycle could change that.
  • Ask your processor or co‑op what share of their sales moves to export markets and which regions. If more than 30% of their volume is export‑dependent, you’re more exposed to trade disruption than the average FMMO pool assumes. That’s not a reason to panic — it’s a reason to know your DMC enrollment status and your processor’s contract notice period.
  • Stress‑test at an all‑milk price of $18/cwt. Model your operation’s breakeven at $18/cwt for six months. If you flinch at that number, your banker probably does too — and it’s better to have that conversation on your terms than theirs.

In the next 90 days:

  • Revisit your component goals with your nutritionist. Align butterfat, protein, and SCC targets against where your processor’s export mix is actually heading — not where it was three years ago. If your processor is shipping more cheese and whey protein than they were in 2023, your feeding and genetics program should reflect that. 
  • If your rolling 12‑month butterfat sits below 4.0% and protein below 3.2%, you’re probably leaving money on the table in a market that rewards components over volume. Review genetics, nutrition, and grouping strategies with your advisor.
  • Mark July 2026 on your calendar. The USMCA review is the single most consequential trade‑policy event of the year for your milk check. Mexico and Canada represent 44% of the U.S. dairy export value. You should know what’s at stake before the headlines tell you. 

Key Takeaways

  • The export boom is real — and so is the pricing gap. Record Q1 2026 volumes confirm accelerating global demand, but the widening spread between all‑milk and mailbox means the gains aren’t landing dollar‑for‑dollar. On a 500‑cow herd, ADC’s estimated $0.40/cwt widening works out to roughly $54,750/year in additional deductions under the new FMMO math. Run it for your herd. 
  • Components are the strategy, not a bonus. Fat and protein drive the highest‑margin export categories — cheese, butter, and high‑protein ingredients. NFDM just hit $2.06/lb, the highest since 2014, because protein is being pulled into higher‑value products. If your herd is still optimized for volume, you’re misaligned with where the money is going.
  • Mexico is the linchpin, and July is the deadline. Indonesia, MENA, and Southeast Asia are growing fast, but Mexico and Canada together account for 44% of U.S. dairy export value. Any USMCA disruption hits harder than most producers expect — and the formal review is three months away. If your processor ships heavily into that corridor, it’s your risk too. 

The Bottom Line

Nyman likes to point out that per‑capita dairy consumption in parts of Asia runs 50–60 pounds per person, compared to roughly 600 in the U.S. The growth potential is abroad. It’s real. But potential doesn’t pay bills — pricing formulas do. 

“The world needs what we produce,” Nyman said. “And together, we’re making sure they can access it.” 

That access is the result of 30 years of work. What matters now — for the next 30 and for the next milk check — is whether your contracts, components, and cost structure are set up to capture the value when it arrives. Or whether someone else captures it first. Where does your breakeven sit if Mexico stumbles or make allowances widen again? 

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More

The Sunday Read Dairy Professionals Don’t Skip.

Every week, thousands of producers, breeders, and industry insiders open Bullvine Weekly for genetics insights, market shifts, and profit strategies they won’t find anywhere else. One email. Five minutes. Smarter decisions all week.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

DAIRY’S DIVIDE: February Milk Prices Expose America’s $5-Per-Hundredweight Dairy Lottery

Florida dairy farmers earn $5.11 more per cwt than Midwest farms for identical milk. Is geography worth $1.28 million per year? June 1 changes everything.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The February 2025 Federal Milk Marketing Order prices reveal a stark $5.11 per hundredweight divide between Florida ($25.42) and Upper Midwest ($20.31) producers, creating a $1.28 million annual advantage for identical 1,000-cow operations based solely on geography. This regional inequality highlights fundamental flaws in a system that undergoes significant transformation on June 1, when the return to the “higher-of” Class I formula, updated make allowances, and other changes take effect. Meanwhile, a dramatic shift in component values—with protein surging and butterfat declining—signals strategic production opportunities for forward-thinking producers. Smart dairy farmers are already preparing by shifting focus to protein production, calculating their June 1 impact, and implementing risk management strategies before market volatility intensifies.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Regional Price Gap: A $5.11 per hundredweight difference between identical milk in Florida versus the Upper Midwest creates “dairy haves and have-nots” based purely on location, not management quality.
  • June 1 Formula Change: The return to the “higher-of” Class I pricing formula would have reduced February’s Class I price by 44 cents, suggesting the change may not benefit producers as promised.
  • Component Value Shift: With protein values rising (up 20¢ to $2.53/lb) and butterfat falling (down 13¢ to $2.82/lb), producers should reassess breeding and nutrition programs to emphasize protein.
  • Action Required: Dairy producers must prepare for June 1 by calculating their specific exposure to formula changes, adjusting production strategies to emphasize protein, and implementing risk management tools before prices decline.
  • Depooling Impact: February’s narrow 28-cent spread between Class III and IV prices reduced depooling incentives, but March’s projected 46-cent spread could trigger Class IV depooling, affecting producer payments.
FMMO milk pricing, regional milk price gap, June 1 dairy changes, dairy component values, milk class price formula

Florida dairy farmers are banking $5.11 more per hundredweight than their Upper Midwest counterparts for identical milk—highway robbery or fair market?

February’s milk check exposes a system that’s making some farmers rich while others barely survive.

With significant pricing changes coming June 1, here’s who stands to win and get the short end of the stick in Dairy’s great regional lottery.

The Cold, Hard Numbers: February’s Price Reality

February’s Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) uniform prices tell a tale of two dairy industries. Prices increased in just three of the 11 FMMOs—those blessed with high Class I (fluid milk) utilization—while the other eight regions saw declines from January.

This pattern creates winners and losers based purely on geography, not management skill or milk quality.

The Florida order maintained its crown with an impressive $25.42 per hundredweight (cwt), climbing 38 cents from January. Meanwhile, Upper Midwest producers scraped the bottom at a measly $20.31 per cwt.

FMMO RegionFebruary 2025 Uniform PriceChange from January
Florida$25.42/cwt+$0.38
Southeast$24.32/cwt+$0.22
Appalachian$23.65/cwt+$0.15
Northeast$22.18/cwt-$0.27
Arizona$22.02/cwt-$0.31
Pacific Northwest$21.14/cwt-$0.42
California$20.94/cwt-$0.35
Central$20.75/cwt-$0.29
Southwest$20.72/cwt-$0.33
Mideast$20.67/cwt-$0.31
Upper Midwest$20.31/cwt-$0.38
PRICE GAP$5.11/cwt

This $5.11 difference in identical products has producers questioning the fairness of a system that seems to play favorites. What does your region cost you each month?

For a 1,000-cow dairy producing 70 pounds per cow daily, this regional difference amounts to over $107,310 monthly—more than $1.28 million annually.

“A Florida dairy farm with 1,000 cows will earn $1.28 MILLION MORE annually than an identical Upper Midwest operation—purely because of geography. That’s not a pricing system; it’s a lottery.”

Bill Davidson, who milks 850 cows near Eau Claire, Wisconsin, feels the regional sting every month: “We’re producing the same quality milk with the same components as farms in Florida, but we’re getting over $5 less per hundredweight. That’s more than $800,000 a year, and our operation loses because of our zip code. How is that fair?”

Are Your Milk Classes Working FOR You or AGAINST You?

Class prices displayed similarly uneven performance in February. The Class I base price jumped to $21.27 per cwt, up 89 cents from January and a substantial $3.28 from February 2024.

But other classes faltered:

  • Class II fell 50 cents to $21.08 per cwt
  • Class III dipped 16 cents to $20.18
  • Class IV took the biggest hit, plunging 83 cents to a 12-month low of $19.90
Milk ClassFebruary 2025 PriceChange from JanuaryChange from Feb 2024
Class I (base)$21.27/cwt+$0.89+$3.28
Class II$21.08/cwt-$0.50+$0.55
Class III$20.18/cwt-$0.16+$4.10
Class IV$19.90/cwt-$0.83+$0.05
Class III-IV Spread$0.28/cwtNarrowest since Mar 2023

JUNE 1 ALERT: Your Milk Check Is About to Change

Mark your calendars for June 1, 2025, the day the dairy pricing system will undergo its biggest overhaul in years.

After months of hearings and negotiations, all 11 FMMOs approved amendments to pricing formulas that will fundamentally alter how your milk check is calculated.

The most significant change is the return to the “higher-of” formula for Class I milk pricing. This reverses the controversial “average-of plus 74 cents” formula that’s been in place for years.

Based on February’s numbers, this would have reduced the Class I base price by 44 cents per cwt—proving that what sounds good in a boardroom doesn’t always benefit farmers.

“The irony is stunning: The ‘higher-of’ formula that benefits farmers would have REDUCED February’s Class I price by 44 cents. Are we fixing the system or just reshuffling who gets squeezed?”

Changes Taking Effect June 1WinnersLosers
Return to “higher-of” formulaHigh Class I utilization areasWould have reduced Feb Class I price by $0.44/cwt
Updated make allowancesProcessors gain increased marginsAll producers face potential payment reductions

June 1 also brings updated manufacturing allowances for processors—essentially increasing what they can deduct from your milk check.

The new make allowances include 25.19 cents for cheese, 22.72 cents for butter, 23.93 cents for nonfat dry milk, and 26.68 cents for dry whey.

The timing of these changes—deliberately set for World Milk Day—seems almost like a cruel joke to producers facing potentially reduced payments.

Maria Hernandez, whose family operates a 400-cow dairy near Orlando, Florida, sees both sides of the regional pricing debate: “Yes, we benefit from Florida’s higher prices, but our production costs are also higher. What matters to all of us is stability. These constant formula changes create uncertainty that makes it impossible to plan long-term.”⁷

FOLLOW THE MONEY: Component Shift Could Make or Break Your Dairy

Innovative dairy producers don’t just look at the bottom line—they follow the components.

February saw a dramatic shift as butterfat values plummeted about 13 cents to $2.82 per pound, their lowest level since July 2023. Meanwhile, protein values surged more than 20 cents to $2.53 per pound, hitting a four-month high.

ComponentFebruary 2025 ValueChange from JanuaryTrend
Butterfat$2.82/lb-$0.13Lowest since July 2023
Protein$2.53/lb+$0.204-month high
Nonfat Solids$1.55/lb-$0.045
Other Solids$0.48/lb-$0.06

“When protein is worth $2.53 and butterfat only $2.82 per pound, the market sends a clear signal: The era of fat-focused production is ending. The question is whether YOUR breeding program has gotten the message.”

This inverse relationship signals a critical shift in production strategy. Farms focusing on butterfat may need to reconsider their approach, while those with high-protein herds could see their advantage grow.

The gap between these component values tells a more precise market story than any press release—consumers are chasing protein, not fat.

Research from the Journal of Dairy Science has long shown that milk components vary significantly across farms and directly impact profitability under the FMMO pricing system.⁹ Smart producers can manage these components through strategic decisions about breed selection, lactation management, feed rations, and milking frequency.

The $5 QUESTION: Is Geographic Lottery Fair for Dairy Farmers?

The $5.11 gap between Florida and Upper Midwest prices exposes the growing inequity built into the FMMO system.

Originally designed to ensure fair milk prices across regions, today’s system has morphed into one that heavily favors certain areas—creating dairy haves and have-nots.

The System’s Historical Logic

Regional price differentials weren’t created in a vacuum. They were established to reflect actual economic factors: transportation costs to move milk from surplus to deficit regions, local supply and demand conditions, and higher production costs in certain areas. Florida’s high fluid utilization (Class I) and distance from major production regions historically justified higher prices to ensure adequate local supply.

But as milk production has consolidated and transportation systems have evolved, many industry experts from Cornell University and other institutions question whether today’s extreme regional price gaps truly reflect economic reality—or if they’ve become an outdated mechanism that arbitrarily rewards some producers while punishing others.

While the upcoming June changes will adjust Class I differentials, they’re unlikely to close this regional chasm. Divergent pricing guarantees that identical milk produced with identical care receives wildly different payments based on location.

This regional lottery undermines the FMMO system’s very purpose of creating an equitable playing field for all dairy producers.

Regional Price Gap ImpactMonthly Loss per Farm Size
100-cow dairy$10,710 per month
500-cow dairy$53,550 per month
1,000-cow dairy$107,100 per month
5,000-cow dairy$535,500 per month

Are YOU prepared for June 1? The time to adjust your business strategy is NOW.

POOLING EXPOSED: How Your Check Gets Manipulated

Think of milk pooling like a community fund: producers contribute milk, the fund collects revenue from all classes, and everyone gets a share based on complex rules. But here’s the catch—when prices align a certain way, handlers can withdraw their high-value milk from the pool, leaving less money for everyone else.

That’s deploying in simple terms, and it’s why February’s numbers matter to YOUR bottom line.

February’s tiny 28-cent spread between Class III and IV prices meant less incentive for this manipulation—but for how long?

February’s class price dynamics dramatically altered the pooling game. At just 28 cents per cwt, the spread between Class III and Class IV prices hit its narrowest margin since March 2023.

This tight spread reduced processors’ incentives to deploy milk, a practice that often leaves producers with the short end of the stick.

The result? Despite three fewer marketing days than in January, the total milk pooled in February barely declined, reaching 12.65 billion pounds, according to USDA pooling data.

Class IV pooling surged by 1.26 billion pounds to 2.7 billion pounds—the highest volume since April 2023—while Class III pooling dropped by 895 million pounds.

These shifts directly impact producer payments and expose how vulnerable the system is to manipulation.

MARCH WARNING: Prepare for Price Pressure

Looking ahead, March uniform prices will likely decline.

The March Class I base price has already been announced at $21.02 per cwt, down 25 cents from February.

Based on Chicago Mercantile Exchange futures prices as of March 13, both Class III and IV could drop substantially, with Class III projected at $18.25 and Class IV at $18.71—creating a 46-cent spread that reverses February’s trend and could trigger more Class IV deployment putting your March milk check at risk.

This forecasted decline comes just months before the June 1 pricing changes take effect—giving producers little time to adjust their business models before yet another seismic shift in the payment system.

Those prepared for these changes will survive; those caught unaware may not.

SURVIVAL GUIDE: Three Steps to Beat the System

February’s price data reveals more than just numbers—it exposes a system in transition that rewards those who understand its complexities.

The regional disparities, shifting component values, and upcoming formula changes create threats and opportunities.

1. PROTEIN POWER: Shift Your Production Focus

With protein values outpacing butterfat, review your nutrition program and consider genetic selection that emphasizes protein content.

According to research from the University of Wisconsin’s Dairy Innovation Hub, producers can increase milk protein by 0.1-0.2 percentage points through targeted nutrition strategies, potentially adding thousands in annual revenue.

Consult with nutritionists about amino acid-balanced rations and evaluate your breeding program to select for higher protein traits.

2. CRUNCH THE NUMBERS: Calculate Your June 1 Impact

Run detailed scenarios showing how the return to the “higher-of” formula will impact your specific operation based on your utilization and component levels.

Progressive Dairy’s analysis shows the impact will vary dramatically depending on your regional blend price and utilization rates.

Don’t wait for your co-op or milk handler to tell you what’s coming—do the math yourself.

3. HEDGE YOUR BETS: Risk Management is Essential

Consider futures contracts or options to protect against volatility during the transition period.

Even smaller producers should explore minimum price guarantees and Dairy Revenue Protection options before June 1 hits.

Innovative producers are already preparing for the June 1 changes by reassessing production strategies, considering component optimization, and exploring risk management tools.

As the pricing game changes, so must your approach to playing it. Those who adapt will thrive; those who don’t risk getting culled from an industry that shows little mercy to the unprepared.

“The dairy pricing system isn’t just complex—it’s deliberately opaque. Those who master its intricacies will survive June 1; those who don’t understand their milk check may not be writing checks much longer.”

The dairy pricing system may be complex, but one thing is crystal clear: knowing how to navigate it separates those who will survive from those who won’t.

February’s numbers are just the first sign of what promises to be a high-stakes year for America’s dairy farmers.

Learn More

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend