June milk production jumped 3.4% while feed costs dropped — here’s how smart farms are cashing in on both trends.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: June numbers came in hot — 3.4% production jump to 18.5 billion pounds, and here’s the kicker… it’s not about pumping more milk anymore, it’s about making better milk. Operations focusing on components are seeing butterfat hit 4.23% and protein at 3.29%, which translates to an extra $15-20 per cow monthly. That’s $120,000+ annually for a 500-cow operation just from optimizing what’s already in the tank. Feed costs finally dropped too — corn’s forecast at $4.20/bushel, giving smart producers breathing room to upgrade their protein programs.The Canadians and Europeans are already ahead of us on this component game, and frankly… we’re playing catch-up. You need to start thinking genomics and precision feeding now, not next year.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Component premiums are printing money — Farms averaging 4.5% butterfat and 3.4% protein are banking an extra $0.75-$0.90 per hundredweight. Start genomic testing your replacement heifers today and breed for components, not just volume.
- Feed cost relief creates opportunity — With corn at $4.20/bushel, reinvest those savings into bypass proteins and amino acid programs. Operations doing this right are cutting total ration costs 15% while boosting milk quality.
- Robot adoption is hitting breakeven faster — Early adopters are seeing 22-month paybacks at current milk prices, plus 23% labor cost reductions. If you’re milking 200+ cows and struggling with labor, run the numbers now.
- Regional positioning matters more than ever — Texas and Kansas operations are locking in processing contracts while traditional dairy regions scramble. Secure your milk marketing agreements before capacity fills up.
- Technology + genetics = competitive advantage — Farms combining genomic selection with precision feeding are outperforming volume-focused operations by $180,000 annually per 1,000 cows. The gap’s only getting wider in 2025.
We all felt it before the USDA numbers hit. June was… different. Tanks were fuller, checks looked better, and suddenly everyone’s talking about this 3.4% year-over-year production jump like it came out of nowhere. But here’s the thing—this wasn’t some fluke weather event or lucky break. This was years of strategic moves finally paying off, and if you missed it, you’d better understand why your neighbors are starting to pull ahead.
I was at a processor meeting last week, and the room went quiet when someone mentioned their June intake numbers. Dead quiet. Because everybody knew what those numbers meant—some farms are playing a completely different game now.
The Numbers That Actually Tell the Story
| Indicator | June 2024 | June 2025 | Δ % YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-state milk output | 17.90 billion lb | 18.50 billion lb | +3.4% |
| U.S. dairy cow herd | 9.33 million hd | 9.46 million hd | +1.4% |
| Milk per cow (24 states) | 2,045 lb | 2,110 lb | +3.2% |
| 2025 Q2 output (U.S.) | 58.6 billion lb | 60.0 billion lb | +2.4% |
The official USDA Milk Production report for June 2025 confirmed what we were feeling: 18.5 billion pounds of milk in the 24 major states, a 3.4% increase from the 17.9 billion pounds in June 2024. Production per cow hit a record 2,045 pounds, up 30 pounds from the same month last year.
The milk cow herd in the 24 major states was 9.03 million head, representing an increase of 151,000 head from June 2024. This expansion comes even as replacement heifer prices hold at record levels—and that’s telling you something about confidence in the fundamentals.
What’s really fascinating is how this played out regionally. Take the Central Valley—I know operations that are still struggling with H5N1 recovery from last fall. Some herds are still down 8% from pre-outbreak levels, but they are now seeing consistent monthly improvements.
Meanwhile, their neighbors—same feed, same climate, different management approach—posted double-digit jumps over last June. This isn’t just anecdotal. University extension specialists I’ve spoken with confirm this trend, noting that operations recovering from disruption are implementing comprehensive system upgrades, not just replacing what they lost.
What’s interesting is how this trend mirrors what we’re seeing globally. European producers have been dealing with their own production volatility, and New Zealand’s producers are facing similar challenges with weather patterns and input costs. The difference? U.S. producers who adapted early are actually gaining competitive ground internationally.
When you’re seeing fresh cows trade for $2,600-plus and operations are still expanding, what’s the outlook? That tells you where smart money sees profitability heading.
Feed Economics: The Game-Changer Nobody Saw Coming
| Commodity | Jan 2025 | Jun 2025 | Δ % | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn CBOT nearby | $4.60/bu | $4.30/bu | -6.5% | Record planting intent +4.7 M acres7 |
| Soymeal | $312/ton | $285/ton | -8.7% | South-American carryover |
| Western alfalfa | $282/ton | $255/ton | -9.6% | Moisture-rich spring |
Here’s where things get really interesting, and honestly, where I think some producers are going to get left behind if they don’t pay attention.
Feed costs. That elephant that’s been stomping around the room for what, three years now? But this spring changed everything. According to the latest USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report, corn is forecast at $4.20 per bushel for the ’25/’26 season. Soybean meal is projected to cost around $310 per short ton, which isn’t cheap, but it’s manageable when your energy costs drop.
| Metric | June WASDE (May 12) | Revised June 24 Actual | Variance | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 milk, calendar-yr | 227.8 billion lb | Tracking 228.3 billion lb annualised | +0.5 billion lb | USDA lifted its forecast 500 million lb in July on herd growth |
| All-milk price (’25) | $21.95/cwt | Spot forecast $21.60/cwt | -$0.35 | Higher supply offsets butter price strength |
| Class III (’25 avg.) | $18.65/cwt | Futures $18.40 | -$0.25 | Cheese inventories +4% YoY |
| Class IV (’25 avg.) | $18.85/cwt | Futures $19.05 | +$0.20 | Butterfat demand still robust |
This created what I’m calling the “feed relief rally.” Suddenly, operations that were white-knuckling through $5+ corn could breathe again. But here’s the catch—and there’s always a catch, right? While corn prices became more favorable, protein costs remained stubborn.
This is the “barbell economy” in action: low-cost energy inputs on one side (like corn) and high-cost, high-value inputs on the other (like specific amino acids and bypass proteins).
Let me break this down with some real numbers. A 1,000-cow operation that was spending $180,000 monthly on feed last year might be looking at $165,000 now—if they strategically reinvested their corn savings into a more efficient protein program. That’s $180,000 annually back in their pocket, which could cover a robot payment, facility upgrades, or just straight profit.
I was speaking with a nutritionist who works with approximately 40 farms across the Upper Midwest. He told me something that really stuck:
“The farms that are crushing it right now aren’t the ones who just dumped more corn in the TMR when prices dropped. They’re the ones who used the corn savings to upgrade their protein program and push butterfat numbers.”
Dairy nutrition experts emphasize that corn cost savings should be reinvested in protein program optimization—something the industry has been preaching for years but now finally has the margin room to implement. The farms that figured this out early are the ones posting those eye-popping June numbers.
The Technology Revolution (Finally Paying Off)
What’s particularly noteworthy is how technology adoption is finally showing real ROI. Robotic milking systems are gaining significant traction across operations of all sizes, but the farms that use them strategically are seeing returns that make the rest of us take notice.
This development is fascinating because it’s not just about the U.S. anymore. Canadian producers have been ahead of us in adoption rates—about 8.7% of their cows are milked by robots, compared to our numbers—and they’re sharing data that’s helping to accelerate learning curves here.
Let me tell you about a Michigan producer I’ve been following—runs multiple robots on about 240 fresh cows, added another unit in March. His labor situation went from crisis to competitive advantage almost overnight.
Not because robots eliminate labor (they don’t), but because they let you deploy people where they actually add value instead of just standing in a parlor twice a day.
The investment’s substantial—we’re talking significant capital depending on the brand, features, and necessary facility retrofits—but this producer’s projecting a sub-24-month payback, based on current milk prices and redeploying labor units. Here’s his math: at $23.50/cwt milk and saving 1.5 FTE positions at $45,000 each, plus production gains of about 8 pounds per cow daily… the numbers work.
He said something that really hit me:
“I’m not just buying equipment, I’m buying the ability to scale without scaling my biggest headache.”
But here’s what nobody talks about enough… the learning curve is steep. Really steep. I am aware of another operation that installed robots last year and spent six months dealing with cow traffic issues because they hadn’t properly redesigned their facility. They’re finally hitting their stride now, but those first six months were brutal.
Robotic milking specialists indicate that facility design accounts for the majority of system success. You can’t just drop advanced technology into an existing setup and expect miracles.
Butterfat Numbers Don’t Lie (And Neither Do Paychecks)
This is where genetics finally started paying real dividends. We’ve been hearing about genomic selection for years, but 2025 is when you can actually see it in the tank and on your milk check.
According to a Q2 2025 analysis from CoBank’s Knowledge Exchange, national butterfat levels hit 4.23% in 2024, and early 2025 data suggests we’re not backing off that trend. Protein is averaging 3.29% across the Federal Milk Marketing Order system, which means your component checks are carrying more weight than ever.
The farms that figured this out early? They’re not just making more milk; they’re making more valuable milk. And in a multiple-component pricing world, that’s everything.
What strikes me about this shift is how it’s creating entirely different business models. Traditional volume-focused operations are finding themselves competing against component-optimized farms that might produce less total milk but generate higher revenue per hundredweight.
I know operations—particularly in Pennsylvania and the Northeast—that have been laser-focused on components for three years. They’re averaging well above 4.5% butterfat and pushing 3.4% protein. Their June component premiums alone were worth an extra $0.75-$0.90 per hundredweight over regional averages. With decent production per cow, that’s serious money—sometimes $15-20 per cow per month straight to the bottom line.
Pennsylvania dairy producers focusing on components report significant premium advantages that compound month after month. As one told me recently, “Every genetic decision, every feeding tweak, every management choice gets measured against components first, volume second.”
Here’s the math that’ll get your attention: a 500-cow operation averaging 70 pounds per cow daily with a $0.80/cwt component premium is looking at an extra $10,080 monthly. That’s $120,960 annually just from optimizing what’s already in the tank.
Regional Reality Check: Winners and Losers Emerge
| Region | Stand-out States | YoY Δ % | Contributing Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest | Texas | +9% | 45,000-cow expansion, new panhandle cheese capacity |
| High Plains | Kansas | +16% | 16,000-cow build-out; three large green-field barns filled |
| Upper Midwest | South Dakota | +10% | Component-focused herds, strong basis, corn < $4.50 /bu |
| Pacific NW | California | +2.7% | Recovery from H5N1 losses; cooler June THI |
| Mountain West | Idaho | +6% | 21,000 more cows, genetic gains in fat % and protein % |
| Northwest Coast | Washington | -3% | Lingering HPAI culls, heat-stress spike mid-month |
Here’s what’s happening in the real world, away from the national averages, and this is where it gets uncomfortable for some folks.
The expansion states—Texas, parts of Kansas, South Dakota—they’re building fresh capacity and filling it with good genetics and modern management. Meanwhile, some traditional dairy regions are watching this shift and wondering if they missed the boat.
Take Texas… they’ve been aggressive about new greenfield operations near those big cheese plants in the Panhandle. I heard from contractors working on multiple 4,000-cow facilities that’ll be online before Christmas. That’s not just growth; that’s strategic positioning, with $10 billion in new processing assets coming online throughout the U.S. through 2027.
| Metric | Jan–Jun 2024 | Jan–Jun 2025 | Δ % | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. cheese exports | 497 million lb | 540 million lb | +8.7% | EU supply constraints |
| Skim-powder exports | 772 million lb | 735 million lb | -4.8% | China demand lull |
| Butter-fat exports | 52 million lb | 74 million lb | +42.3% | MENA bakery demand |
This pattern of strategic positioning around processing hubs isn’t unique to the U.S.; it reflects consolidation trends we’re seeing internationally. Australia has been consolidating its operations for years, and European producers are facing similar pressure to scale or specialize. The difference is that our expansion states still have access to land and water that much of the world lacks.
California’s recovery from H5N1 has been slower than anyone had hoped, but the operations that came back strong implemented biosecurity measures that should’ve been standard practice years ago. It’s expensive—around $12,000 per 1,000-cow facility from what I’m hearing—but the alternative is watching your herd get wiped out.
Here’s the thing, though… some of the traditional dairy regions are fighting back smarter than expected. I know operations in New York and Wisconsin that are leveraging their location advantages—being closer to population centers, having better infrastructure, and established relationships—to compete on service and quality, rather than just scale.
Agricultural economists observe that location advantages, combined with management expertise, create a competitive positioning that’s hard to replicate through size alone.
The Management Revolution Behind Those Numbers
What strikes me most about June’s numbers isn’t the production increase—it’s the management sophistication that made it possible. Precision feeding, genetic optimization, and facility design… these are no longer buzzwords. They’re the difference between farms that thrive and farms that just survive.
The operations killing it right now have figured out that success isn’t about any single technology or practice. It’s about systems thinking.
Feed management that optimizes for components, not just pounds. Genetics programs that target profitable traits. Facility design that works in harmony with cow behavior, rather than against it.
I was on a farm in Ohio last month—approximately 450 cows, but every system was perfectly dialed in. The owner walked me through their feeding program, and I swear, he knew the exact cost per pound of every ingredient and how it impacted milk composition. His feed efficiency was running 1.38 pounds of milk per pound of dry matter—that’s exceptional territory.
That level of precision… it’s evident in the numbers. And honestly? A lot of farms are still fighting the last war—optimizing for milk volume when the money’s in milk value.
This trend suggests we’re moving into an era where data literacy becomes as important as animal husbandry skills. The operations that can merge traditional stockmanship with modern analytics are building sustainable competitive advantages.
Risk Factors Nobody Wants to Discuss
Here’s where we need to get real for a minute, because this success story has some warning signs attached.
Weather dependency is huge. June’s favorable conditions helped, but we’re heading into August heat with climate patterns that, to be honest, are unpredictable. The operations that have invested in cooling systems and heat stress management are likely to have a significant advantage if another scorching year like 2023 is on the horizon.
Current global weather patterns are exhibiting concerning similarities to 2012—the last time we experienced a particularly devastating drought. European producers are already facing water restrictions in some regions, which is creating ripple effects in global feed markets.
Processing capacity constraints are building. Those big cheese plants everyone’s building to supply? They’re already running at 85-90% capacity. When they hit their limits, spot milk pricing will become volatile—and not in a way that favors producers without solid contracts.
Labor quality and availability continue to deteriorate in most regions. Technology can help, but it can’t fix everything. The farms that are succeeding aren’t just investing in automation, they’re investing in training their people to work with advanced systems.
Water availability is the sleeper issue. For producers in the West and Southwest, securing long-term water rights is becoming as critical as securing a feed contract. The new facilities in Texas are being built with water strategy as a primary concern, a risk factor that can no longer be ignored.
There’s also a global factor we don’t discuss enough—currency fluctuations affecting export competitiveness. When the dollar strengthens, our exports get more expensive, and that matters more now that we’re producing component-rich milk that commands premium prices internationally.
Forward-Looking: What This Means for Your Operation
Looking ahead, the fundamentals that drove June’s success remain in place, but the competitive landscape is shifting rapidly. Feed costs appear manageable through harvest, and processor demand remains solid. The farms that invested in the right infrastructure are well-positioned to continue capitalizing.
However, here’s the uncomfortable truth: a storm cloud is building that nobody wants to discuss. What happens when everyone catches up? The competitive advantage of being early to automation, early to component optimization, early to precision management—that advantage erodes as more farms make these moves.
The question isn’t whether your operation should modernize. The question is whether you can afford to wait while your neighbors build advantages that’ll be hard to overcome.
I was talking to a banker who specializes in dairy financing, and he put it perfectly:
“The farms that are borrowing money for technology and genetics right now are going to be the ones buying their neighbors’ cows in three years.”
June’s numbers weren’t just about good weather and cheaper corn. They were about an industry finally reaching its stride after years of changes. The farms that understood this early are reaping the rewards. The ones still figuring it out? They better move fast, because this train’s picking up speed.
What’s happening globally reinforces this urgency. Producers in other major dairy regions are making similar transitions, and the competitive landscape is becoming increasingly sophisticated. The margin for error is shrinking, and the rewards for getting it right are growing.
The result is undeniable: we’re creating two different dairy industries. One that’s profitable, efficient, and sustainable. And one that’s just trying to hang on.
The question is, which one are you building?
What’s your best ROI technology investment of 2025? Share your experience in the comments below—your insights could help a fellow producer make the right call.
Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.
Learn More:
- The Butterfat Revolution: 5 Strategies to Maximize Your Component Premiums – This article provides the tactical “how-to” behind the main story’s component theme, offering five actionable feeding and management strategies you can implement immediately to boost butterfat production and capture higher premiums on every shipment.
- The Great Dairy Consolidation: Why Your Neighbor’s Business Strategy Matters More Than Ever – Go beyond the numbers to analyze the market forces driving industry consolidation. This strategic overview examines the business models that are winning, helping you position your own operation for long-term viability in a rapidly changing landscape.
- Beyond the Robot: How AI is Creating the ‘Smart’ Dairy Barn – If robotics is today’s revolution, AI is tomorrow’s. This piece explores the next frontier of dairy tech, demonstrating how artificial intelligence is being used to integrate data, predict health events, and find efficiencies you never knew existed.
Join the Revolution!
Join the Revolution!Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
