Archive for DMC program

GDT surged 6.7%, and U.S. powder output hit a 12-year low – but your DMC window closes in 17 days.

17 days to the DMC deadline. Class IV is $1.50/cwt above Class III. If your DRP is weighted heavily on III, you’re insuring a check that doesn’t exist.

Executive Summary: NDM hit $1.64/lb on Friday — its best week since 2007 — putting milk powder 16.75¢ above Cheddar blocks. That’s not a blip. U.S. dryers produced just 2.143 billion pounds of NDM/SMP in 2025, the weakest since 2013, while the industry poured $11 billion into cheese plants that need more milk but don’t make powder. GDT confirmed the global story on February 3: the index surged 6.7%, SMP jumped 10.6%, and all seven product categories gained. The Class III/IV spread now sits at roughly $1.50/cwt—and every month you don’t restructure your DRP or optimize components, you’re subsidizing that spread from your own check. DMC enrollment closes February 26. Below: 4 moves before the deadline, the three structural constraints keeping powder tight, and the single production number that tells you whether this rally is real.

Class III/IV Spread

Nonfat dry milk surged 18¢ in a single week to settle at $1.64/lb on Friday, February 6 — the highest CME spot price since August 2022 and the strongest weekly gain since May 2007. That puts milk powder a full 16.75¢ above Cheddar blocks and within pennies of butter. For the first time in years, the product that the U.S. processing sector largely ignored is outpricing the one the entire industry was built around.

 

By Friday, MAR26 Class III futures were trading above $17/cwt through year-end, while Class IV — emboldened by surging NDM — was in the high $18s/cwt. DMC enrollment closes February 26. Just 17 days from today. Spring flush is six to eight weeks out.

Kevin Krentz, president of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau and a roughly 600-cow operator near Berlin, WI, knows what pool disadvantage feels like. He testified at the USDA Federal Milk Marketing Order hearing on August 31, 2023, that negative PPDs reached $9/cwt, costing his operation nearly $200,000 during the PPD crisis. The current Class III/IV spread is opening a similar gap — and the decisions you make about DRP coverage, component targets, and handler alignment right now determine which side of it you land on. 

GDT Surges 6.7%: Powder and Mozzarella Lead a Clean Sweep

The Global Dairy Trade auction (TE397) on February 3 delivered a 6.7% jump in the price index — the third consecutive gain — with the average winning price firming to $3,830/MT across 24,034 tonnes sold and 175 bidders participating. SMP leapt 10.6% to $2,874/MT, and mozzarella matched it at +10.6% to $3,694/MT. Those two categories matter most for U.S. powder and cheese pricing.

Butter surged 8.8% to $5,773/MT, with Solarec’s Belgian C2 butter hitting $4,950 — up 9.6% from two weeks ago. AMF gained 5.0% to $6,524, WMP rose 5.3% to $3,614, cheddar added 3.8% to $4,772, and lactose ticked up 1.5% to $1,410. Trade commentary attributed part of the rally to Chinese restocking ahead of the Lunar New Year and seasonal MENA demand ahead of Ramadan, though GDT doesn’t disclose buyer-country data.

Phil Plourd, president of Ever.Ag Insights, framed the broader landscape bluntly in a report on industry consolidation trends: “It is a street fight, in terms of figuring out ways to stay relevant, to get more productive, to stay ahead of the curve, to manage risk better, because it’s never been an easy business. It’s not going to be an easy business anytime soon”. 

EEX and SGX Confirm the Bid: 16,631 Tonnes Traded

The rally wasn’t just a GDT event. On EEX, 5,365 tonnes (1,073 lots) traded last week, with butter futures firming 10.7% on the Feb26–Sep26 strip to an average of €4,730 and SMP jumping 9.4% to €2,605. Only whey pulled back — down 1.8% to €1,019.

SGX told the same story: 11,266 lots traded, with WMP up 8.6% to $3,791 and SMP up 11.0% to $3,298 on their Jan26–Aug26 curves. AMF settled at $6,281 (+6.3%) and butter at $5,664 (+7.3%). The NZX milk price futures contract moved 1,763 lots — 10,578,000 kgMS — suggesting New Zealand producers are actively pricing forward at these levels. Powders led the rally on both exchanges. That confirms the GDT signal isn’t isolated.

European Market Snapshot: Powder Rallies, Butter, and Cheese Correct

European spot and futures markets pulled in opposite directions last week — and that divergence is the story worth watching.

ProductCurrent IndexWeekly ChgY/Y Chg
Butter€3,933−0.9%−46.6%
SMP€2,247+4.4%−10.6%
Whey€999Flat+12.5%
WMP€3,065−0.3%−30.0%
Cheddar Curd€3,222−1.4%−33.1%
Mild Cheddar€3,248−0.1%−31.9%
Young Gouda€3,059+1.1%−29.0%
Mozzarella€3,098+2.6%−24.0%

EU Weekly Quotation, 4 February 2026. Country splits tell the story: German butter unchanged at €4,050; Dutch butter +€50 to €3,950; French butter −€160 to €3,800. SMP: German +€90 to €2,250; French +€70 to €2,200; Dutch +€120 to €2,290.

That 46.6% year-over-year drop in EU butter tells you how inflated 2025 prices were — not how weak 2026 prices are. SMP moving in the opposite direction, with all three country quotations gaining, mirrors the global powder bid.

Every cheese index sits 24% to 33% below year-ago levels. That’s a massive compression European processors are still absorbing — and it’s keeping EU cheese competitively priced on global markets.

Global Supply: Butter Growing, Powder Capacity Isn’t

European and Irish butter supplies are expanding. Powder capacity outside the U.S. isn’t growing fast enough to fill the gap that GDT just priced in.

Ireland’s provisional December collections came in at 267kt, down 3.0% y/y — the second consecutive monthly contraction. But full-year 2025 totalled 9.10 million tonnes, up 5.0% y/y, with milksolids up 5.5% on stronger fat (4.93%) and protein (3.85%). Irish butter production for 2025 hit 286kt, up 7.1%.

Spain posted a decent December at 624kt (+1.8% y/y), but the full-year picture is flat — down 0.2%. UK butter production jumped 6.6% in December to 15.4kt, and total cheese production rose 3.4% to 42.4kt. Full-year butter hit 199kt (+2.1%), and cheese reached 513kt (+2.9%).

China’s farmgate price edged to 3.04 Yuan/kg in late January — up just 0.2% month-over-month and still 2.8% below last year. The Ministry noted that collections growth was driven by per-cow productivity, not herd expansion, with less productive cows culled. With Lunar New Year stocking mostly behind us, the question now is whether post-holiday Chinese buying holds — or if TE397 was the peak.

$11 Billion Went to Cheese. Now, Powder Is Short.

Powder got scarce because the industry was built for cheese, not because the world suddenly needed more milk powder.

U.S. dairy processors have committed more than $11 billion in new and expanded capacity across more than 50 projects in 19 states between 2025 and early 2028 — overwhelmingly targeting cheese and whey protein, not drying, according to data released by the International Dairy Foods Association on October 2, 2025. UW Extension dairy economist Leonard Polzin described “more than eight billion dollars’ worth of stainless steel” being invested in new and expanded dairy processing in January 2025 — before several major announcements pushed the total higher. CoBank analyst Corey Geiger flagged the tension directly: those plants will need more milk and “many more dairy heifer calves in future years to bring the national herd back to historic levels.” 

Ken Heiman knows the margins from the inside. The certified Master Cheesemaker runs Nasonville Dairy in Marshfield, WI, processing up to 1.8 million pounds of milk per day. He’s blunt about the economics: cheese alone just about breaks even — it’s the whey protein stream that makes the operation work. “We ought to be thanking people who are buying whey protein at Aldi’s,” Heiman told the New York Times on July 16, 2025. “It definitely enhances the bottom line”. That math explains why plants keep expanding cheese capacity even when cheese margins are thin. The whey subsidizes the vat. 

Meanwhile, USDA’s Dairy Products report (February 5, 2026) confirmed that combined U.S. NDM and SMP output in December totalled just 170.3 million pounds — down 6.2% year-over-year. Full-year 2025 powder production: 2.143 billion pounds. The weakest annual total since 2013.

U.S. Cheese Hits 1.28B Pounds in December — But Butter’s the Tighter Market

December cheese production hit 1.279 billion pounds, up 6.7% y/y, with Cheddar surging 9% and Italian varieties climbing 7.4%. Mozzarella grew 5.9%, even as foodservice channels continue pulling back. Hoard’s Dairyman reported in March 2025 that “food service has seen the biggest pullback in cheese demand” and that the pullback “shows little sign of any significant rebound”. Domino’s confirmed the trend firsthand, reporting a 0.5% decline in U.S. same-store sales in Q1 2025. 

Butter production expanded a more modest 2% to 203.8 million pounds. But the spot market doesn’t feel oversupplied — CME butter jumped 13¢ last week to $1.71/lb, including a 10.25¢ leap on Thursday alone, with dozens of unfilled bids remaining at Friday’s close. USDA’s Agricultural Prices report pinned the national average fat test at 4.51% in December, up 0.05 percentage points y/y. More fat entering the system, and buyers still can’t get enough.

Cheddar blocks rose 11¢ to $1.4725/lb on 51 loads — competitively priced for global buyers. Dry whey was the lone loser, dipping 2¢ to 73¢/lb. But the whey complex is structurally shifting: December whey protein isolate production surged 11.7% to 20.6 million pounds, and WPC (50–89.9% protein) rose 9%, while lower-protein WPC (25–49.9%) fell 12.8%. Ask Ken Heiman — plants keep making cheese because the whey stream pays the bills.

Three Constraints Stacking: Heifers, Dryers, and Feed

The powder squeeze has staying power because three structural constraints are converging—and none resolves quickly.

Heifers. USDA’s January 2025 estimate pegged dairy replacement heifers (500 lbs+) at 3.914 million head — the lowest since 1978. CoBank’s Abbi Prins projected the shortfall won’t begin recovering until 2027 at the earliest. With beef-on-dairy breeding running at elevated levels, the pipeline keeps shrinking even as processors need more cows. 

Dryers. The $11 billion investment wave went to cheese and whey protein, not powder. No major drying plant expansions have been announced. If Q1 2026 NDM/SMP production stays below 180 million pounds monthly despite record milk supply, drying capacity isn’t just tight — it’s structurally insufficient. 

Feed. MAR26 soybean meal settled at $303.60/ton on Thursday, with further gains on Friday. MAR26 corn hit $4.35/bu before giving back ground. On February 4, Trump stated that China was considering purchasing 20 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans this season, following what he called “very positive” talks with President Xi. On February 8, USDA confirmed an additional 264,000 MT of China soybean sale. This follows China’s completion in January of its initial 12 million MT commitment from the October 2025 Trump-Xi agreement, as confirmed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at Davos. That buying pressure boosted soybean and soybean meal values heading into the week. Higher feed costs don’t make DMC optional. They make it essential. 

4 Moves Before February 26

1. Restructure your DRP to match actual pool exposure. If your co-op runs 60% cheese and 40% butter/powder, but your DRP is weighted 80% Class III, you’re insuring a milk check that doesn’t exist. High-component herds generally benefit from the Component Pricing option; average-component herds from Class Pricing with accurate III/IV weighting. Get a current quote — premiums fluctuate with volatility.

Your Pool MixYour DRP WeightingClass III/IV SpreadMonthly Exposure (500 cows)Risk Level
60% Cheese / 40% Powder80% Class III / 20% Class IV$1.50/cwt-$10,000 to -$15,000HIGH
60% Cheese / 40% Powder60% Class III / 40% Class IV$1.50/cwt-$3,000 to -$5,000MODERATE
40% Cheese / 60% Powder60% Class III / 40% IV$1.50/cwt+$4,000 to +$6,000LOW
70% Cheese / 30% Powder70% Class III / 30% Class IV$1.50/cwt-$5,000 to -$8,000MODERATE-HIGH

2. Stack DMC before the deadline. Tier 1 now covers up to 6 million pounds — up from 5 million — giving medium-sized operations an extra million pounds of protection. You must establish a new production history based on your highest marketings from 2021, 2022, or 2023. The six-year lock-in (2026–2031) saves 25% on premiums but surrenders annual flexibility. Run the math both ways. 

3. Audit your milk check. AFBF economist Danny Munch, speaking at ADC’s Dairy Hot Topics session during World Dairy Expo on October 2, 2025, urged producers to share milk check stubs with ADC, their state Farm Bureau, or their market administrator. He flagged instances — particularly in Wisconsin — where independent handlers weren’t meeting existing disclosure requirements. 

Foremost Farms patrons already know the pain: the cooperative announced a $0.90/cwt market adjustment deduction from member payments, citing “a significant difference between Class III milk costs and the revenue generated from cheese and whey product sales”. The FMMO pricing formula changes implemented on June 1 resulted in decreases “up to $0.90 per cwt” for producers in the Upper Midwest, Central, and Mideast FMMOs. Look for months where your PPD went sharply negative while Class IV traded at a premium. Cost: one uncomfortable phone call. Potential payback: significant. 

4. Run your component economics. As of January 2026, FMMO component prices ($1.4595/lb butterfat, $2.1768/lb protein): every tenth of a percent in butterfat translates to roughly $0.15–$0.35/cwt in additional revenue. A herd testing 4.3% fat and 3.3% protein versus one at 3.8% and 3.0% holds a cumulative advantage of roughly $1.00–$1.50/cwt. On 1,000 cows averaging 75 lbs/day, even the low end is approximately $22,000/month. Protected fat supplements typically run $0.30–$0.55/cow/day — University of Illinois dairy nutritionist Mike Hutjens has pegged rumen-protected choline alone at roughly 30¢/cow/day, with calcium salt fat supplements adding cost above that depending on inclusion rate. Genetic gains through sire selection take 6–24 months to hit the tank. Ask your nutritionist for the breakeven component test at current premiums. 

Herd ProfileButterfat %Protein %Premium Value ($/cwt)Monthly Revenue (1000 cows, 75 lb/day)Annual Advantage
High-Component Herd4.3%3.3%+$1.25+$28,125+$337,500
Average Herd3.8%3.0%BaselineBaselineBaseline
Gap+0.5%+0.3%$1.00-$1.50$22,500-$33,750$270,000-$405,000

What to Watch at TE398 on February 17

The next GDT auction will be the first real test of whether TE397’s 6.7% surge was panic buying or a structural repricing. Rabobank’s Q4 update (“Global Dairy Supply Surpasses Demand,” published January 7, 2026, via AHDB) estimated Big-7 milk production finished 2025 up 2.2% y/y, with 2026 growth moderating to 0.6%. If SMP holds above $2,800/MT at TE398, the floor is real. If it retreats below $2,600, the rally may have been seasonal restocking ahead of Ramadan and Lunar New Year.

On the domestic side, the March USDA Dairy Products report — covering January production — is the single most important data point. If NDM/SMP output stays below 180 million pounds, drying capacity is confirmed insufficient. Above 195 million, the system may be self-correcting.

What This Means for Your Operation

  • If you ship to a cheese-heavy co-op like Foremost Farms and your DRP is weighted more than 60% Class III, you’re likely insuring the wrong revenue stream. Pull your current DRP parameters this week and request a requote before the February 17 GDT gives the market its next signal.
  • If you’re considering forward contracting at current NDM-driven Class IV levels, talk to your risk management advisor now. DRP covers revenue; DMC covers margin. Neither locks in today’s spot price, but structuring both before February 26 gives you the cheapest available hedge against the spread narrowing or feed costs widening.
  • If you’re in the Southwest — near Hilmar’s Dodge City plant or Leprino’s Lubbock facility — your handler’s plant mix may already capture more Class IV value. DFA is even seeing milk production growth in areas like southern Georgia and northern Florida. Know where your milk goes before you assume the spread hits you the same way it hits a Wisconsin cheese-pool shipper. 
  • If your herd averages below 4.0% butterfat and 3.1% protein, you’re leaving an estimated $1.00+/cwt on the table relative to component-optimized herds in the same pool. That’s roughly $22,000/month on 1,000 cows at the low end.
  • If your PPD went negative in any month since October 2025, ask your co-op directly whether Class IV milk was depooled. Danny Munch at AFBF has flagged handlers not following existing disclosure rules. 
  • Counter-signal: If Q1 NDM/SMP production rebounds above 195 million pounds monthly, the scarcity thesis weakens, and the Class III/IV spread narrows. The March Dairy Products report is the first real test.

Key Takeaways

  • The Gap: NDM at $1.64 sits 16.75¢ above Cheddar and within pennies of butter. For cheese-pool herds, that translates to a Class III/IV spread costing real money every month — The Bullvine’s October 2025 paired-herd analysis pegged it at $10,000–$15,000/month on 500 cows. 
  • Why It Lasts: 2025 powder output fell to 2.143 billion pounds — weakest since 2013 — while $11 billion in new capacity went to cheese and whey. Heifer replacements are at a generational low of 3.914 million head, constraining even the milk supply. 
  • Your Biggest Lever: Components plus DRP alignment. Moving from average to high components is worth $1.00–$1.50/cwt, but only if your DRP weighting and handler actually capture that value. Fix both before February 26.
  • The Cost of Waiting: Rolling into spring with a cheese-heavy pool, a Class III-heavy DRP, and average components is a bet that the Class IV premium disappears before your cash does.

The Bottom Line

The February 26 DMC deadline isn’t the end of the conversation — it’s the last clean entry point before spring flush reprices everything. Where does your breakeven sit if Class III stays in the low $17s through summer?

To enroll in the 2026 DMC, contact your local USDA Farm Service Agency office or visit farmers.gov/service-center-locator. The deadline is February 26, 2026.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Dairy Producer Profits Climb: Surging Margins amid Rising Milk Prices and Falling Feed Costs

Explore how higher milk prices and lower feed costs drive profits for dairy producers. Are you prepared to take advantage of these rising margins?

Summary:

The recent surge in producer margins in the dairy industry, driven by rising milk prices and falling feed costs, marks a notable trend. In August, the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) recorded its highest margin since 2019. High milk prices, at their peak since 2022, paired with significantly reduced feed costs like maize, soybean meal, and premium alfalfa hay, have catalyzed these margins. The 9.4% decrease in corn prices notably impacted these costs. Despite slight expected feed cost increases, projections suggest milk prices will maintain robust margins. Challenges persist, such as high interest rates, demand from the beef market, and rising labor and energy costs. However, the market indicates strong signals for expansion, suggesting inevitable growth. Dairy farmers must navigate these dynamics to optimize their production strategies.

Key Takeaways:

  • Producer margins have surged due to rising milk prices and falling feed costs, with the DMC program margin reaching its highest since inception.
  • The milk price has significantly increased, contributing to healthier producer margins, while the cost of essential feed components like corn has declined sharply.
  • The market predicts continued strong margins supported by robust milk prices despite potential slight increases in feed costs towards the year’s end.
  • Expansion in milk production is anticipated but remains limited by factors such as a shortage of replacement animals and high interest rates.
  • Though promising, the current profitability scenario does not account for rising costs in labor and energy, which could affect overall producer profitability.
dairy producers, milk prices, feed costs, All-Milk price, corn prices, milk margin over feed costs, DMC program, dairy product demand, maize prices, profit margins

What’s happening in the dairy sector with farmers looking at their profit margins with newfound optimism? Consider the following scenario: milk prices are rising, but feed expenses, which have historically been a considerable burden, are down. This combination bodes well for dairy producers, as it directly impacts their profitability. “The increase in milk margins is not a fluke. Significant market factors are changing the scene, creating an opportunity for manufacturers.” In this ever-changing circumstance, the milk margin over feed prices reached an all-time high in August, demonstrating an unmistakable trend. Rising milk prices have significantly impacted, but reducing feed costs is changing the game. These variables provide fertile ground for conversations about today’s rising producer margins, which could lead to increased profits for dairy producers.

MonthAll-Milk Price ($/cwt)Feed Cost ($/cwt)Milk Margin Above Feed Cost ($/cwt)
June 202422.8010.3012.50
July 202422.8010.4712.33
August 202423.609.8813.72

The Profit Equation: Milk Prices Rise, Feed Costs Decline 

The market dynamics around milk pricing and feed costs have shifted dramatically in recent months. The newest Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) program, a federal risk management program for dairy producers, has played a significant role in this shift. Its statistics show that dairy farmers have significantly increased their margins due to this beneficial change. So, how did we get here?

Let’s start with milk pricing. The All-Milk price, a crucial indication, has continuously increased, reaching its highest level since 2022. This growth has helped manufacturers pad their coffers. While milk prices remain relatively high, the decline in feed costs plays an even more significant influence. These feed expenses include essential ingredients like maize, soybean meal, and premium alfalfa hay.

Consider this: Corn prices fell by 9.4%, considerably influencing DMC’s composite feed cost index. This decrease in feed prices decreases producers’ total expenditure, increasing profit margins significantly. The DMC program reported a jump in milk margin over feed costs to $13.72 per cwt. in August, the most significant margin since the program began in 2019. This graph depicts increased profitability for farmers, emphasizing the extraordinary convergence of high milk prices and low feed costs. Such a combination benefits any dairy firm aiming to improve its bottom line.

The Milk Price Ascendancy: Decoding the Key Drivers

The rise in milk costs may be ascribed to several critical variables combined to produce the present situation. Notably, local and worldwide demand for dairy products has significantly affected the situation. Dairy has risen in popularity due to growing customer interest and a trend toward healthier dietary options. Furthermore, overseas markets have opened up, with more exports benefiting from favorable trade circumstances and competitive pricing.

Constraints on supply expansion have also contributed to the rise. The complications of growing herds, because of high input costs and a scarcity of replacement animals, have hindered the capacity to rapidly increase output in response to demand, keeping prices high.

The All-Milk pricing of $23.60/cwt is rather substantial. In historical terms, this price level reflects the solid pricing environment seen in 2022. Back then, it prompted manufacturers to explore growth, capitalizing on the profitability of such high prices. However, today’s situation has additional hurdles, such as increasing operating expenses that were less visible before, making the present price peak a lighthouse that requires careful navigation to utilize.

Unraveling the Corn Conundrum: Why are Feed Costs Dropping? 

Exploring the factors behind the drop in feed prices shows an intriguing interaction of market forces. A deeper analysis reveals that a considerable decline in maize prices is responsible for most of this reduction. But what’s causing the corn price to drop?

First, good weather conditions in vital corn-producing countries have resulted in large harvests, driving supplies over expected levels. As the market responds, prices naturally fall due to increasing supply. Furthermore, export demand for US maize has declined, especially among certain overseas purchasers, due to global economic uncertainty and competition from other countries. This lack of demand puts further downward pressure on pricing. As a result, maize is a significant component of dairy feed, and its price significantly impacts total feed expenditures.

The 9.4% decrease in grain prices recorded in August was crucial. When we add corn’s significant contribution to the composite feed cost calculation, the significance of this decrease becomes evident. It’s more than just statistics; this decrease alters dairy producers’ economic picture, allowing them higher margins despite increased operating expenditures in other sectors.

However, caution is essential. Markets constantly change, and the forces driving these changes may vary rapidly. While present circumstances favor reduced feed prices, any change in weather patterns or geopolitical trade links might cause a reversal, highlighting the persistent uncertainty of agricultural economics.

Peering into the Future: A Promising Yet Nuanced Outlook for Producer Margins 

Looking forward, the prognosis for producer margins remains good, although complicated. According to current futures market statistics, milk margins might rise even more in October, perhaps reaching $15.40/cwt. This predicted gain is mainly based on steady, if not robust, milk prices. However, these estimates are based on thin ice, with various factors that might shift the trajectory.

Changes in feed prices continue to be a significant element among possible problems. Although prices have lately fallen, any reversal may dramatically reduce profits if maize or soybean meal prices rise. Similarly, given the sensitivity of the worldwide market, unexpected swings in milk demand might alter existing estimates.

While strong margins often drive higher milk production, numerous variables may counteract this tendency. The continued need for replacement animals and high loan rates limit speedy production ramp-ups. Furthermore, given the persistent demand for beef, moving resources away from milk production remains a realistic option for many farmers.

Expanding on operational costs, manufacturers face persistent pressure from increased expenditures in areas not included in DMC estimates. Labor and energy costs continue to rise, posing further challenges for manufacturers seeking to reap the full advantages of higher margins.

Producers must stay adaptable and watchful in this complicated terrain, always responding to market signals. As margins remain strong and strategic planning continues, keeping an eye on expense control will be critical in navigating the year’s remaining months. With the market signaling an apparent demand for expansion, the issue is not if but when significant growth reactions will occur. Acknowledging the challenges ahead will help farmers stay prepared and alert.

The Delicate Balance: Navigating Expansion Amidst Economic Enticements and Hurdles

While the industry’s strong margins may indicate a rapid rise in milk production, the reality is more nuanced. One of the main obstacles is the need for replacement animals. Many farmers are constrained because the demand for cattle in the meat market has drained prospective dairy substitutes. As beef prices remain attractive, the economic motivation for dairy producers to reallocate cows goes beyond simple numbers; it is inextricably linked to farm economics and long-term planning.

Furthermore, high borrowing rates are a severe barrier. Financing new projects or herd expansions at these rates may strain cash flow and inhibit investment, even if the profits seem attractive. For farmers with already low margins, the danger of higher borrowing rates might outweigh short-term profits.

Finally, the beef market’s attraction should be considered. The continuous tug exerted by beef producers provides an alternate option for dairy farmers looking for quick returns on their animal investments. This rivalry generates a tug-of-war situation in which dairy expansions are postponed in favor of immediate, but perhaps brief, financial relief. Together, these elements create a tapestry of caution and reluctance that counterbalances the fortunate environment created by favorable margins.

Beyond the DMC: Hidden Costs Challenge Dairy’s Golden Era

While the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) provides a favorable picture based on particular criteria, additional growing expenses are worth considering. For example, labor costs have been rising. The cost of trained personnel, critical for running effective operations, has risen, putting further financial burden on companies.

Energy prices remain a significant worry. Energy is used extensively in the dairy sector, from milking equipment to cooling systems. Market volatility and geopolitical issues might cause energy costs to rise, further affecting the bottom line. Indeed, these variables could reduce the large margins promised by increased milk prices and decreased feed costs.

Finally, although the DMC gives a glimpse of producer margins, taking these extra charges into account is necessary to complete the picture. Producers must balance these expenses and take advantage of favorable milk and feed price trends.

The Bottom Line

The resounding tone of this market study indicates a moment of enormous potential for dairy farmers. Favorable movements in milk prices and lower feed costs have created an intense profit situation, boosting producer margins to record highs. Despite constraints such as restricted animal supply and increased auxiliary expenses, the outlook for growth remains cautiously hopeful. The market signals are clear—growth is achievable, but smart navigation is required.

As the business approaches potential expansion, one can’t help but wonder: How can dairy farmers profit on these economic tailwinds while addressing the challenges? With an ever-changing marketplace at their feet, choices taken today might influence the dairy industry’s direction for years to come. What initiatives will you take to secure long-term development in your operations?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

April 2024 DMC Margin Holds at $9.60 per CWT Despite Steady Feed Costs

Discover how April 2024’s DMC margin held at $9.60 per cwt despite steady feed costs. Curious about the factors influencing this stability? Read on to find out more.

April concluded on a reassuring note for dairy producers , with a robust $9.60 per cwt income over the feed cost margin through the DMC program. Despite the challenges posed by strong feed markets, milk prices remained steady, ensuring no indemnity payments for the second time this year. This stability in income is a testament to the reliability of the DMC program. 

MonthMilk Price ($/cwt)Total Feed Cost ($/cwt)Margin Above Feed Cost ($/cwt)
February 2024$21.00$11.10$9.90
March 2024$20.70$11.05$9.65
April 2024$20.50$10.90$9.60

The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) , released its Agricultural Prices report on May 31. This report, which served as the basis for calculating April’s DMC margins, demonstrated how a late-month milk price rally balanced steady feed market conditions

The DMC program, a key pillar of risk management for dairy producers, protects against rising feed costs and milk prices, ensuring a stable income. In addition, programs like Dairy Revenue Protection (Dairy-RP) play a crucial role, covering 27% of the U.S. milk supply and providing net gains of 23 cents per cwt over five years. 

“April’s margin stability shows milk prices’ resilience against fluctuating feed costs, a balance crucial for dairy producers,” said an industry analyst. 

April’s total feed costs fell to $10.90 per cwt, down 15 cents from March, while the milk price dipped to $20.50 per cwt, down 20 cents. This kept the margin at $9.60 per cwt, just 5 cents lower than March. 

Milk price changes varied by state. Florida and Georgia saw a 30-cent increase per cwt, and Pennsylvania and Virginia saw a 10-cent rise. In contrast, Idaho and Texas saw no change. Oregon experienced a $1.10 per cwt drop. 

The market fluctuations observed in April underscore the dynamic nature of the dairy market. In such a scenario, the importance of risk management programs like DMC and Dairy-RP cannot be overstated. As of March 4, over 17,000 dairy operations were enrolled in the DMC for 2023, with 2024 enrollment open until April 29. This proactive approach to risk management is crucial for navigating the uncertainties of the dairy market.

Key Takeaways:

  • April’s Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) margin was $9.60 per hundredweight (cwt), with no indemnity payments triggered for the second time in 2024.
  • USDA NASS’s Agricultural Prices report detailed April’s margins and feed costs, revealing a robust dairy income despite strong feed markets.
  • Notable changes included Alfalfa hay at $260 per ton (down $11), corn at $4.39 per bushel (up 3 cents), and soybean meal at $357.68 per ton (down $4.49).
  • Milk prices averaged $20.50 per cwt, marking a slight 20-cent drop from March but sufficient to offset stable feed costs.
  • Major dairy states mostly saw a 20-cent decrease in milk price, with a few exceptions like Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Virginia experiencing modest growth.

Summary: Dairy producers in April reported a robust income of $9.60 per cwt over the feed cost margin through the DMC program. Despite strong feed markets, milk prices remained steady, ensuring no indemnity payments for the second time this year. This stability in income is a testament to the reliability of the DMC program. The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released its Agricultural Prices report on May 31, which calculated April’s DMC margins. Programs like Dairy Revenue Protection (Dairy-RP) play a crucial role, covering 27% of the U.S. milk supply and providing net gains of 23 cents per cwt over five years. Market fluctuations underscore the dynamic nature of the dairy market, emphasizing the importance of risk management programs like DMC and Dairy-RP.

Send this to a friend