Archive for herd longevity

Holstein Conformation’s $2,678 Gap: How Holstein USA’s Million‑Cow Study Should Change Your Linear Type Strategy

Holstein USA’s million‑cow study found a $2,678 lifetime gap tied to conformation. The question isn’t if it’s real—it’s how close your herd is to the wrong side of it.

Executive Summary: Holstein USA’s 2022 “Conformation Matters” study, based on nearly a million cows, found a $2,678 lifetime milk revenue gap between top‑ and bottom‑quartile conformation cows at $20/cwt. Follow‑up genomic work in 2022–2024 has reinforced the same message: functional Holstein conformation sits right at the intersection of production, health, fertility, and longevity. The article explains why treating 0.0 STA as “safe” on traits like teat length and rear legs side view can quietly drag your herd toward a breed average that’s already too short, too straight, and too hard to milk in parlors and robots. It ties those structural shifts to real US cost models for lameness and mastitis, where individual cases commonly run $336.91 for lameness, and $120–$444 for clinical mastitis, and simple herd‑level math quickly climbs into the tens of thousands per year. From there, it lays out a practical framework: audit your herd’s linear scores, sort traits into “push harder” vs “stay in the middle,” and decide how much NM$ you’re actually willing to give up to fix genuine structural problems instead of chasing index points alone. For herds looking at robotic milking between now and 2030, it also spells out which udder and leg traits matter most for attachment, box time, and the inevitable “fallout group” that never truly fits the robot.

Holstein Association USA’s 2022 “Conformation Matters” work shows a $2,678 lifetime milk gap between top and bottom type cows. That study is a few proof runs old now, but the big genomic data sets published since 2022 are telling the same story: when you breed for functional Holstein conformation, the milk cheque and the robot both notice. 

If you’re picking Holstein sires in 2025–2026, your linear type and STA choices are either pulling your herd toward that top group—or quietly pushing you the other way.

The sire looked fine on paper. Good index, solid components, the kind of proof you’d throw in the tank without much debate. Down in the type box, there was a tidy row of zeros on traits nobody around the table was actively chasing: teat length, rear legs side view, teat placement—0.0 STA across the board. Safe. Or so it seemed.

Fast‑forward to freshening. Liner slips start piling up on the milking log. The robot flags fresh heifers for failed attachments while older cows walk in, milk out, and leave like they always have. Lay the classification sheets beside those sire proofs and the pattern jumps off the page: those daughters are shorter‑teated and straighter‑legged than the cows that built the herd.

If that feels uncomfortably familiar, you’re exactly who this article is for.

When “Average” Already Means Below Functional

Here’s the hard truth: a zero STA doesn’t mean “ideal.” It only means “average for today’s Holstein population.”

Standardized Transmitting Abilities are centered on the current breed average. Zero is just the midpoint of where Holstein conformation sits right now, after a decade‑plus of heavy use of sires like Mogul, Supersire, and their relatives. Those bulls did a lot of good—production, health, fertility—but they also shifted the baseline on a handful of traits your parlor and robot care about every single milking. 

Teat length is a classic example. In many Holstein populations influenced by that sire family, proofs have leaned shorter‑teated and straighter‑legged. When you pick a bull at 0.0 STA for teat length in that context, you’re not “holding” where your herd is. You’re agreeing to land wherever the current breed average sits—even if that average is already below the functional range for your liners and your equipment. 

If the population keeps creeping shorter or straighter each generation and you keep chasing zeros, your daughters drift right along with it.

Scenario2026 Herd Average2029 Herd Average2032 Herd Average
Scenario A: Keep picking 0.0 STA bulls4.84.54.2
Scenario B: Pick +0.5 to +1.0 STA bulls4.85.35.8
Functional Zone (reference)5.55.55.5

Where It Hurts First: Parlors and Robots

On a conventional parlor herd, the first signs don’t look like a genetics problem. They look like everyday aggravations.

You’re bumping units back into place more often, especially on first‑lactation heifers. The milk graph on your meters shows more double peaks—vacuum on, flow off, then a second rise. Teat ends on your youngest group look rougher, with more “rings” and hyperkeratosis than the older cows that never gave you trouble.

That’s teat‑to‑liner fit. When teats are too short to fill the liner barrel properly, a vacuum is applied before milk begins to flow. During bimodal letdown, teats are exposed to high vacuum with low milk flow for 45–60 seconds or more, which is hard on teat ends and results in milk loss. Hoard’s Dairyman has reported that when letdown is delayed 30–60 seconds, yield at that milking drops about 3 pounds, and if the delay stretches beyond a minute, losses can hit 7 pounds per milking

Now put that same udder in front of a robot.

The robot doesn’t care what the pedigree looks like. Its job is to find teats, line them up, and attach them, over and over. When rear teats sit too close together or are very short, the laser and camera struggle. You see multiple attach attempts on the same cows. Box time creeps up for those animals, while others are in and out. The same IDs appear on the “frequent fetch” or “failed attach” lists every week.

Robot manufacturers, advisers, and genetics guides consistently warn that cows with very close rear teats or extreme udder shapes are hard to milk robotically. That isn’t just an aesthetic complaint. It’s labor, box capacity, and frustration. 

On top of that, AMS advisers in Canada and the US often point to a small but real slice of cows that simply never fit the robot’s “sweet spot” for udder and leg conformation and eventually leave the herd for that reason. Around a lot of robot barns, people talk about a small fallout group—that couple of percent of cows that soak up time on fetch lists and never really click with robotic milking. 

Straight Legs, Sore Cows

Rear leg set has its own mythology. A lot of people still quietly believe straighter legs must mean stronger structure and better longevity. The biomechanics don’t back that up.

A cow’s rear leg isn’t a fence post. It’s a shock absorber. That moderate angle at the hock—around the middle of the scoring range in most systems—lets the leg flex and spread impact every time she walks on concrete, steps into a stall, or pivots to turn. When you breed too far toward the “posty” end, you take that flex away. 

The result? Hocks that stay puffy and sore. More claw horn lesions and sole ulcers, especially in the outer claw. Cows that pass a quick stand‑still look but show a short, choppy stride when you locomotion‑score them. 

Recent work on lameness costs makes the financial side of that pretty blunt. A 2023 model based on US data pegged average lameness cases at about $336.91 per cow, with digital dermatitis cases running roughly $100 more than other causes. Each additional week a cow stays lame adds about $13.26 in cost. 

The global picture isn’t comforting either. Reviews and field reports put average dairy cow lameness prevalence in the low‑20% range, with herd‑level and regional reports ranging from the low‑teens up to over 50% in some confinement systems. You don’t have to be anywhere near the top of that range for it to chew through your margins. 

What lameness really costs

ItemTypical value (US data)
Average cost per lameness case$336.91 per cow 
Extra cost for DD vs other causes~$100 more per case 
Added cost per extra lame week$13.26 per week 

Run that math on your herd. In a 500‑cow setup with 20% lameness prevalence, even at mid‑range cost estimates, you’re easily into tens of thousands of dollars a year. Start adding extended lame periods and extra culls, and simple back‑of‑the‑envelope totals can push past $70,000 a year in some 500‑cow scenarios when you apply those per‑case costs and extra weeks of lameness. 

Cost ItemPer-Case Value (USD)Annual Herd Impact (500 cows, 20% prevalence)Notes
Average lameness case$336.91$33,691Treatment, lost production, fertility loss
Digital dermatitis (DD) premium+$100 above base+$10,000 if 100 DD casesMost common infectious cause
Extended lameness (per extra week)+$13.26/week+$13,260 if 100 cows lame 1 extra weekCompounding production drag
Clinical mastitis case (early lactation)$120–$444$12,000–$44,400 for 100 casesTreatment + milk discard + culling risk
Conservative 500-cow scenario$50,000–$70,000+/yearLameness + mastitis combined
High-prevalence herds (30%+ lame)$75,000–$100,000+/yearWhere structural weakness really bites

That’s before you even talk about the cows that never get the chance to reach their full lifetime production.

What Holstein USA’s Million‑Cow Study Showed

Holstein Association USA went looking for a hard answer to a question breeders have argued about for decades: does functional conformation really pay in the tank?

Their “Conformation Matters” work, released in late 2022, matched almost 20 years of classification data on just under a million Holstein cows with official DHI production records. Then they ranked cows by their first‑lactation final score and watched what happened over their careers. 

The numbers weren’t subtle.

  • Top‑quartile cows (first‑lactation final scores 82–89 points) averaged 28,037 pounds of energy‑corrected milk (ECM) in first lactation. 
  • Bottom‑quartile cows (final scores 76 and under) averaged 26,500 pounds ECM. 

That’s 1,537 pounds more ECM in just one lactation. At $20/cwt, it’s about $307 more milk revenue right there. 

Over a lifetime, the gap got wider:

  • Top‑quartile cows produced 75,889 pounds of lifetime ECM.
  • Bottom‑quartile cows produced 62,500 pounds.

That’s 13,389 pounds more ECM—roughly $2,678 more lifetime milk income per cow at the same $20/cwt milk price. 

They also lasted longer:

  • Top‑quartile cows delivered 142 more lifetime days in milk than bottom‑quartile cows—nearly five months of extra production. 

Large‑sample genomic studies on US Holsteins published since 2022 keep pointing in the same direction: the genomic regions associated with production, fertility, and longevity often overlap with those influencing key conformation traits. The physics and the genomics are lining up. 

Put those numbers alongside mastitis costs and the picture sharpens again. A widely cited 2015 study on early‑lactation clinical mastitis cases estimated the total cost at approximately $444 per case, including treatment, milk discard, lost production, fertility losses, and culling. Newer work from Michigan State and industry economic summaries shows many farms seeing $120–$330 per case out‑of‑pocket, with milk discard driving most of that. However you slice it, type decisions that raise or lower disease risk move real money. 

If you’re outside the US, plug in your own milk price and cost estimates—the pattern holds even if the exact dollars change.

STA vs. Linear Score: Two Different Tools, One Cow in the Stall

Here’s where a lot of people quietly get tangled: linear scores and STAs are doing different jobs.

Linear scores describe the cow you’re looking at on classification day. On the US 1–50 scale (or the 1–9 scale used in Canada and elsewhere), the midpoint is simply the physical middle between the two extremes. A 25 or 5 is halfway between very short and very long. It doesn’t automatically mean “best.” 

STAs describe what a bull tends to transmit. They’re standardized with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, relative to the current population for that trait. So: 

  • 0.0 STA = daughters expected to be about average for today’s breed.
  • +1.0 STA = one standard deviation above that average.
  • ‑1.0 STA = one standard deviation below.

For many type traits, moving from ‑3.0 to +3.0 STA covers most of the genetic variation you’re going to see in the Holstein population. For many traits that span, the difference translates to roughly 10–12 points on the 1–50 linear scale, though the exact mapping varies by trait and country. 

That’s enough to make a practical difference at the cow level—but it isn’t an infinite lever. And if the population average has already drifted away from what’s functional in your stalls, chasing zeros won’t pull you back.

Sorting Traits: When “More” Helps and When “Middle” Wins

Before you scroll straight to the index column, it helps to sort your type traits into two basic buckets.

Bucket 1 – One‑directional: push to the good side

For these, more really does mean better, within reason:

  • Fore udder attachment
  • Rear udder height
  • Rear udder width
  • Udder cleft/median suspensory

Holstein USA’s own data shows that cows with tighter, higher, stronger udders give more milk, last longer, and pull more dollars through the parlor. On these, you want bulls that move daughters toward the “strong and snug” end. 

Bucket 2 – Intermediate optimum: you want the zone, not the edge

These traits punish you at both extremes:

  • Teat length
  • Front and rear teat placement
  • Rear legs side view
  • Rump angle

Short teats cause liner fit and robot issues. Very long teats get stepped on and damaged. Teats that are too close together or too wide apart create their own milking problems. Legs that are too sickled or too straight both show up on lameness reports and trimming bills. Rumps that are too level or too steep shift calving ease and fertility the wrong way. 

Most experienced classifiers and breeders will tell you the same thing: somewhere in the middle of the linear scale is where cows stay sound and milk‑able. Your job is to know where your herd sits relative to that middle—and pick bulls that move daughters toward the practical zone, not just toward whatever the current population average happens to be. 

Type TraitStrategy BucketTarget STA RangeWhat WinsWhat Breaks
Fore Udder AttachmentOne-directional (PUSH)+0.5 to +2.0Tight, strong, long-lasting uddersWeak attachments → early culling
Rear Udder HeightOne-directional (PUSH)+0.5 to +2.0High, snug udders = more capacity + longevityLow udders → mastitis risk, breakdown
Rear Udder WidthOne-directional (PUSH)+0.5 to +2.0Wide = strong suspensory, more quarters attachmentNarrow → weak suspensory, udder tilt
Udder Cleft/Median SuspensoryOne-directional (PUSH)+0.5 to +2.0Deep cleft = tight ligament = longevityFlat udders → early breakdown
Teat LengthIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +1.0Moderate length = liner fit + robot successToo short → liner slip, failed attachments; Too long → stepped on, damaged
Front Teat PlacementIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +0.5Centered teats = easy milkingToo close → robot struggles; Too wide → milker issues
Rear Teat PlacementIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +0.5Moderate spacing = robot-friendlyToo close → failed attachments; Too wide → poor milk-out
Rear Legs Side ViewIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +0.5Moderate angle = shock absorptionToo straight (posty) → hock stress, sole ulcers; Too sickled → structural weakness
Rump AngleIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +0.5Slight slope = calving ease + fertilityToo level → calving difficulty; Too steep → fertility issues
StatureIntermediate (HOLD ZONE)-0.5 to +0.5Moderate frame = feed efficiencyToo tall → maintenance cost; Too short → capacity limits

A Selection Framework You Can Actually Use

So how do you turn all this into a semen‑ordering strategy instead of a headache?

Here’s a framework you can run in any Holstein herd on a Monday morning.

1. Audit your cows before you audit your bulls.

Grab your most recent classification herd summary. Look at:

  • Average teat length
  • Rear legs side view
  • Udder depth
  • Fore udder attachment
  • Teat placement (front and rear)

Then match that against what you see in the barn. Are you fighting liner slips or robot attachments? Are trimmers seeing the same claw lesions over and over? What do your cull codes say—feet and legs, udder breakdown, mastitis? 

Circle the traits where your herd average is weak and the daily reality backs it up.

2. Translate STAs into the cows you’ll be milking five years from now.

Before you call a bull “moderate,” check the linear interpretation tables from Holstein USA, Lactanet, or your national evaluation center. Ask three questions:

  • At this STA, where do daughters land on the 1–9 or 1–50 scale?
  • Is that better than where my cows are today?
  • Or am I just repeating the same pattern?

If your herd already runs short‑teated and the breed average is short‑teated, a 0.0 STA won’t fix that. You’ll need bulls with positive teat‑length STAs just to pull daughters back into a functional range. 

3. Decide how hard you need to correct—and what you’ll give up to do it.

If you’re:

  • Close to where you want to be (maybe one point off), bulls around ‑0.5 to +0.5 STA can help maintain the status quo.
  • Noticeably off‑center (1.5–2 points), bulls from about +0.5 to +1.5 STA will shift the needle.
  • In the ditch (more than 2 points off and seeing real cow problems), a stretch of more aggressive correction may be worth it.

This is where economics come in. A bull that fixes your worst type problem might not be the very top of your favorite index. But if you’re giving up, say, $50– to pull your herd out of a structural hole that’s costing you far more than that in lameness, mastitis, and robot drama, that’s not a sacrifice. It’s a trade. 

If you’re looking at a bull that would cost you more than about  just to correct one trait, it’s time to slow down and ask whether you’re over‑correcting and holding back overall genetic progress.

4. Watch heritabilities and timelines.

Type trait studies and national evaluations consistently show that stature and teat length have moderate‑to‑high heritabilities (around 0.4), while traits like foot angle are closer to 0.1. That means: 

  • Stature and teat length will move quickly if you select hard.
  • Foot angle and some leg traits will move slowly regardless—they need patience and consistent selection, not wild swings.

Plan for a three‑generation horizon to account for the full impact of your choices to show up in the bulk tank and cull list. 

5. If robots are in your future, start breeding for them now.

If you’re even talking to robot dealers, it’s time to tighten up on:

  • Rear teat placement that gives arms room to find and attach.
  • Teat length that works with your chosen liner profile.
  • Feet, legs, and locomotion that support voluntary traffic. 

If you want a barn full of “robot‑ready” heifers on day one, start biasing sire selection that way at least two years before the first unit is bolted down. The heifers you’re breeding today are the cows your robots will be trying to milk in 2028–2030. 

TraitTarget Linear Range (1–9 scale)Target STA for BullsWhy Robots CarePriority
Rear Teat Placement5.0–6.5 (moderate spacing)+0.3 to +1.0Too close → laser/camera can’t distinguish teats, failed attachmentsCRITICAL
Teat Length5.5–7.0 (moderate to slightly long)+0.5 to +1.5Too short → cups slip during attachment cycle; optimal length = secure sealCRITICAL
Front Teat Placement4.5–6.0 (centered)-0.3 to +0.5Wide or narrow extremes → arm positioning errors, longer box timeHigh
Udder Depth5.0–7.0 (moderate to shallow)+0.5 to +1.5Very deep udders → ground clearance issues, teat height variabilityHigh
Rear Legs Side View4.5–6.0 (moderate angle)-0.3 to +0.5Posty cows = poor locomotion → reduced voluntary traffic, fetch listsHigh
Foot Angle4.5–6.0 (moderate)-0.3 to +0.5Flat feet + concrete = lameness → cows avoid robot, traffic breaks downMedium
Rear Udder Height6.0–8.0 (high)+0.5 to +2.0High attachments = consistent teat position → faster, more reliable cups-onMedium
Locomotion/MobilityScored 1–2 (sound)Select for Feet & Legs compositeLame cows don’t walk to robot → “fallout group” that never adaptsCRITICAL

What This Means for Your Operation

  • Stop reading 0.0 STA as “safe.”
    It only means “average for the current population.” In 2025–2026, that average is already too short, too straight, or too extreme for many parlors and robotic milking systems. 
  • Use Holstein USA’s $2,678 gap as your reality check.
    Their 2022 analysis showed that top‑quartile cows for functional conformation delivered 1,537 lbs more ECM in first lactation, 13,389 lbs more over their lifetimes, and 142 extra days in milk compared to bottom-quartile cows, worth about $2,678 per cow at $20/cwt. 
  • Treat intermediate‑optimum traits like guardrails, not goals.
    For teat length, teat placement, rump angle, and rear legs side view, your aim is to keep daughters in the functional middle and out of both ditches. 
  • Factor real disease costs into your type decisions.
    With recent US work putting average lameness cases at $336.91 per case and clinical mastitis often costing $120–$444, depending on the model, structural weaknesses that drive those numbers up are no longer minor cosmetic issues. They’re cash‑flow problems. If you’re in a quota or high‑component system, run the same math with your actual milk price and premiums. 
  • Think in three‑generation chunks, not one proof run.
    The semen in your tank today shapes your 2030 herd. If you’re drifting with the breed on key traits in 2026, you’re going to be paying for it in 2030 and beyond. 

Key Takeaways

  • Zero STA is a direction, not a destination. When you see a line of zeros, ask where breed average actually is—and whether your robots, your parlor and your cows can live there. 
  • Holstein USA’s own million‑cow study confirms that cows with stronger, more functional conformation don’t just look good on paper; they bring in more milk, stay in the herd longer, and generate more lifetime revenue. 
  • The genomic work published since 2022 supports this: large U.S. Holstein data sets show that genomic regions for production, fertility, and longevity often overlap with those for key conformation traits. 
  • The most profitable herds over the next decade will be the ones that use indexes, STAs, and linear scores together—pushing hard on the right one‑directional traits and holding the line firmly in the functional middle on everything that lives or dies on “optimum,” not “extreme.”

The Bottom Line

At the end of the day, the semen you order this month will decide what kind of cows your kids and grandkids are milking. You can let the breed’s drift pick that cow for you—or you can use the tools we’ve got now to build the kind of Holstein that actually fits your stalls, your robots, and your milk cheque for the long haul. 

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

They Called Him the Three-Legged Bull. He Created the Modern Red Holstein: The Untold Story of Hanover-Hill Triple Threat-Red

53 years ago, a man bet his career on a red calf everyone else called a defect. He was right

Hanover-Hill Triple Threat, the bull they once called a “defect.” He overcame initial rejection and later challenges to become a legend, reshaping the modern Red Holstein breed with his resilience and elite genetics.

Picture this. It’s October 1972, upstate New York. The sale barn at Hanover Hill Holsteins is packed—the kind of crowd that shows up when they know something historic might happen. That electric tension you only get when serious money is about to change hands.

In the ring stands a six-month-old calf. Vibrant red coat. Good on his feet. And by every measure of conventional wisdom in that era? A genetic liability.

See, for most of the 20th century, red and white on a Holstein wasn’t just unfashionable—it was treated as a defect. Something you culled. Something that barred your animal from the prestigious main herdbook. The industry elite wanted nothing to do with it.

But by 1972, something was shifting. All over the world—especially in Europe—people were looking for Red Holstein blood with good conformation. The market was starved for elite red genetics. And when this particular calf stepped into the ring, breeders recognized they were looking at something the industry had never seen before: a red Telstar son from the iconic Barb family.

So when the auctioneer started climbing past $40,000… then $50,000… the tension in that room was palpable.

Ken Young of American Breeders Service had already blown past his authorized limit. His bosses back in DeForest, Wisconsin, hadn’t signed off on anything close to this. But Young kept his paddle in the air.

$60,000. The gavel fell. World record for a Red & White Holstein. And in that moment, the trajectory of an entire breed pivoted on its axis.

When Young’s superiors demanded an explanation, he reportedly offered a reply that’s echoed through the halls of dairy breeding lore ever since: “It was easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission.”

That calf was Hanover-Hill Triple Threat-Red. And here’s the thing—fifty-three years later, if you’re running red genetics in your herd, if you’ve ever admired Apple-Red or watched a Rubels-Red daughter walk into the ring… you’re looking at his legacy.

The World That Existed Before

To really understand what happened in that sale barn, you’ve got to understand the historical context.

For most of the 20th century, the Red Factor gene wasn’t treated as a variation. It was treated as a mistake. A genetic blemish to be erased. Elite North American breeders had systematically selected against red animals for generations. The main herdbooks slammed their doors shut. And the reasoning became self-reinforcing—because all the best genetics for milk and type were being developed exclusively in Black & White bloodlines, the Red & White population kept falling further behind.

It was a vicious cycle. Red cattle needed access to elite genetics to improve. But elite genetics wanted nothing to do with red cattle.

By the early 1970s, however, European demand was changing the equation. Farmers across Switzerland, France, and Germany were actively seeking red genetics with a modern dairy type. The question that haunted every breeder who loved that red coat was deceptively simple: How do you improve a population when the very best bloodlines refuse to acknowledge you exist?

The answer, it turned out, would come from an unexpected place—not the heartland of North American dairying, but the green valleys of Switzerland.

The Swiss Visionary Who Wouldn’t Take No for an Answer

The story of Triple Threat’s creation starts with a young Swiss agricultural graduate named Jean-Louis Schrago. In 1968, Schrago arrived in North America with a mandate that would’ve seemed absurd to most American breeders: find the world’s best red genetics and bring them back to Europe.

His search led him to Hanover Hill Holsteins in New York—the breeding epicenter managed by the legendary R. Peter Heffering. And Schrago walked right in and made an audacious proposal: breed your finest cow, the iconic matriarch Johns Lucky Barb, to a red-factor bull.

Heffering, pragmatic and focused on the lucrative Black & White market, shut him down flat. “There’s no Red & White market,” he told the young Swiss visitor.

But Schrago wasn’t a man who accepted dismissal easily.

He came back in 1971. This time, he brought a delegation of European farmers with him—visible proof of growing demand. And over lunch, Heffering finally asked the question that would change everything: “Alright then. Who would you recommend?”

Schrago’s answer was specific, unconventional, and—looking back—borderline miraculous: Roybrook Telstar.

Now, Telstar was a titan of the Canadian breed. A superstar celebrated for transmitting refinement, dairy character, and exceptional udders. His daughters were known as “show ring prima donnas.” But here’s what most North American breeders didn’t know: Telstar carried a rare genetic variant called the Black-Red gene—a peculiar trait that caused red-born animals to darken as they matured, a phenomenon that would later become known simply as “Telstar Red.”

Schrago knew. And he wasn’t telling everyone.

The logistics alone were insane. Telstar had been exported to Japan in 1967—at the highest price ever paid by Japanese buyers for a Canadian bull at that time. Schrago located two precious units of semen on the other side of the Pacific and arranged their importation for $2,500. A substantial sum at the time—enough to make most breeders think twice.

Then came his final stroke of genius. Rather than using the aging Johns Lucky Barb herself, he advised Heffering to use her greatest daughter—Tara-Hills Pride Lucky Barb EX-94—a formidable cow in her prime who carried the true recessive red gene.

The genetic math was elegant. Telstar contributes the rare Black-Red gene. The dam contributes the true recessive red gene. Together? Something the breed had never seen: an elite red calf carrying the accumulated genetic wealth of Holstein royalty.

Heffering agreed. The mating was made. And on April 24, 1972, the gamble paid off.

When Schrago heard the news, he drove non-stop from Wisconsin just to see the animal he’d dreamed into existence. He later described the calf as “looking like a small deer”—delicate, alert, unmistakably special.

That deer would prove anything but delicate.

Where the Power Came From

To understand why Triple Threat could stamp his offspring with such consistency—why his prepotency became legendary—you’ve got to look at what collided in his pedigree. This wasn’t just good genetics meeting good genetics. This was the deliberate convergence of the most dominant forces in the Holstein universe.

The Sire: Roybrook Telstar EX-Extra. The Canadian superstar whose semen Schrago imported from Japan for the historic mating. While famous for his “show ring prima donna” daughters, Telstar secretly carried the rare Black-Red gene—the source of the unique “chameleon” coat color he passed to his son.

His sire, Roybrook Telstar EX-Extra, was line-bred to the famous “White Cow” family of F. Roy Ormiston in Brooklin, Ontario. His dam, Roybrook Model Lass EX-15, accumulated lifetime credits of 218,814 pounds of milk and 9,018 pounds of fat—numbers that still command respect today. Telstar’s gift to his offspring was unmistakable: style, dairy character, and udders of exceptional texture. He added what breeders called “silkiness” to the hide. But his most unique contribution was the rare Black-Red gene—the genetic trait that would become the visual trademark of the Triple Threat lineage, causing red-born animals to darken progressively with age.

Tara-Hills Pride Lucky Barb *RC (EX-94). The formidable dam of Triple Threat. She was the crucial piece of the genetic puzzle, providing the true recessive red gene from the iconic Barb family. At the same 1972 sale where her son made history, she set her own world record, selling for $122,000.

His dam, Tara-Hills Pride Lucky Barb EX-94, was a force of nature in her own right. Sired by the strength specialist Ellbank Admiral Ormsby Pride, she combined power, width, and constitution with refined dairy character. Lifetime production: 147,756 pounds of milk with 6,264 pounds of fat. And her value showed up in the sale ring—at the same 1972 Hanover Hill Sale where her son commanded $60,000, Pride Lucky Barb herself sold for $122,000. World record for a dairy female. Mother and son shattered two global price records in a single afternoon.

The Matriarch: Johns Lucky Barb EX-97. Triple Threat’s legendary maternal granddam. Known as a “money tree” for shattering price records, she was the crucial, silent carrier of the red gene that made the historic Triple Threat mating possible.

The maternal granddam—Johns Lucky Barb EX-97-4E-GMD-5—was one of the pillars of the Holstein breed. The 1967 All-American aged cow. One of the very first cows in history to achieve EX-97. Her highest record at eight years: 29,052 pounds of milk at 4.7% fat with 1,372 pounds of fat. Lifetime total: 166,311 pounds of milk and 7,582 pounds of fat.

Industry observers called her a “money tree,”—and they weren’t exaggerating. Her progeny consistently shattered price records. Crucially, she was the original source of the red factor in the maternal line—a trait she passed silently down the generations.

Here’s what made the Triple Threat mating so special: it combined two different types of red genes. The rare Black-Red gene from Telstar’s side, and the true recessive red gene from the Barb maternal line. That unique combination gave Triple Threat his special ability to reliably produce red offspring while passing on world-class type and components.

The Chameleon Who Wouldn’t Quit

Triple Threat’s story could’ve ended with that record-breaking sale. Instead, it was only beginning—and the chapters that followed would test his resilience in ways nobody predicted.

True to his Telstar Red genetics, Triple Threat was born a vibrant red—the kind of color that stood out immediately. But within months, something strange began happening. His coat started darkening. You’d visit him one week, and he’d look a shade deeper. By six months, the transformation was visible to anyone paying attention. By nine months, he was almost completely black—often retaining only a few reddish hairs in his ears and the switch of his tail.

The Chameleon Effect. Pictured here at just six months old, Triple Threat had already transformed from a vibrant red calf to nearly all black—a trademark of the “Telstar Red” gene. Despite this confusing visual trait, which appeared in about half his red offspring, his popularity never wavered among breeders of both colors.

This was the famous “Telstar Red” phenomenon in action—a genetic trait inherited directly from his sire. For breeders unfamiliar with the trait, it caused real confusion. Some questioned whether he could even transmit red genetics at all. But verification came quickly: despite his chameleon appearance, Triple Threat consistently passed the red gene to his offspring. About half of his red-born progeny exhibited the same darkening phenomenon—turning what might’ve been a liability into a recognized trademark.

But it was a later chapter that cemented his legend among breeders who valued toughness as much as type.

According to industry accounts, Triple Threat suffered a significant leg injury in his mature years at ABS. The damage was reportedly permanent and debilitating—serious enough that he became known among breeders as “the three-legged bull.” By conventional measures, an animal in that condition should’ve been retired. Should’ve been done.

He wasn’t done.

His libido remained strong. His seminal quality stayed high. He continued to work, continued to breed, continued to stamp his excellence on thousands of daughters. For breeders, this physical resilience became more than an anecdote. It was living proof of constitutional vigor—a will to live that he passed to his progeny. His daughters became renowned not just for their beauty but for their durability. Long-lasting cows who stayed productive from lactation after lactation.

Whether the “three-legged bull” story is the literal truth or an industry legend grown tall over fifty years, the underlying message resonated: this was a bull—and a bloodline—that refused to quit.

A Threat in Three Dimensions

His name proved prophetic. Hanover-Hill Triple Threat-Red posed a genuine challenge to the competition in three distinct ways—a combination that made him one of the most sought-after sires of his generation.

First, type transformation. At a time when many Red & White cattle lacked the scale and refinement of their Black & White counterparts, Triple Threat injected the elite “Hanover Hill look” into the red population. He consistently sired daughters who were tall, long-necked, angular—animals with mammary systems showing exceptional texture and strong suspensory ligaments. His impact on feet and legs was equally dramatic. Flat bone. Correct set to the hock. Traits that contributed directly to the longevity his daughters became famous for.

One European observer summarized it best: “He probably improved conformation more in one generation than any bull ever used in Europe.”

Second, components. While contemporaries like Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation were chasing sheer milk volume, Triple Threat offered something different. High butterfat percentage—inherited from both sides of his pedigree. In today’s component-heavy pricing environment, we’d call that money in the tank. Back then, it made his daughters highly profitable in markets that paid on solids. And it made him a perfect complement to high-volume bloodlines that often tested lower for fat.

Third—and this is the big one—maternal transmission. Triple Threat was what breeders call a “daughters bull.” He produced great daughters but no legacy sons. That’s not a flaw; it’s a pattern you see when a sire’s maternal line is exceptionally dominant. He was a conduit for one of the breed’s most powerful dynasties—the Barbs. His ability to sire what observers called “outsize brood cows”—noted for correct conformation, style, pretty udders, high butterfat, and longevity—was legendary.

His daughters weren’t merely productive. They were matriarchs capable of founding dynasties.

So he had the genetics. He had the resilience. But the proof? That came through his progeny—both daughters and sons who carried his influence forward in ways nobody anticipated.

The Dynasty That Changed Everything

Here’s where the story gets really interesting—and really relevant to anyone running red genetics today.

The crown jewel of Triple Threat’s legacy? The connection to KHW Regiment Apple-Red EX-96 – “The Million Dollar Cow” and arguably the most influential Red Holstein of the 21st century.

The Dynasty Builder: KHW Regiment Apple-Red EX-96. The “Million Dollar Cow” and the most famous Red Holstein of the modern era. Her existence is the direct result of Triple Threat’s legacy: she would not be red without the red factor passed down through her grandsire, Meadolake Jubilant—Triple Threat’s most influential son.

Meadolake Jubilant-RC EX—the vital bridge to the Apple family—and E-D Thor-Red were Triple Threat’s two highest sons. While both were widely used across Canada, the US, and Europe, it was Jubilant who reinforced the classic Triple Threat profile: frame, strength, high components. He sired tens of thousands of daughters, making him one of the most widely used RC sires of his era. But his most important contribution? He carried the red factor forward. One of Jubilant’s significant daughters was Clover-Mist Augy Star EX-94, who became the granddam of Kamps-Hollow Altitude-RC EX-95—the 2009 Red Impact Winner. Altitude produced Advent-Red, Acme-RC, and the famous Apple herself.

That entire Apple family—unparalleled in Red Holstein circles—would never have been red and white if Jubilant hadn’t passed along the red factor. If you’ve used Apple genetics in the last decade, you’re tapping into a lineage that started with that “genetic defect” of a red calf back in 1972.

But the daughters built empires too.

The Showstopper: Nandette T.T. Speckle-Red EX-93-DOM. A two-time All-American who proved Triple Threat daughters could dominate the show ring. She wasn’t just a pretty face; her descendants include the millionaire sire Ladino-Park Talent-RC, further cementing Triple Threat’s influence on the modern breed.

Nandette T.T. Speckle-Red EX-93-DOM was a two-time All-American Red & White in 1981 and 1984—25,290 pounds of milk at 4.7% fat as a four-year-old. Beautiful and productive. Her daughter, Stookey Elm Park Blackrose-ET EX-96, became an All-American in ’92 and ’93, accumulating 149,880 pounds in four lactations while mothering eight Excellent offspring. That line produced Ladino-Park Talent-RC—the world’s only RC millionaire sire. Talent sired Ms Delicious Apple-Red EX-94, who carries double Triple Threat blood and is the dam of Diamondback with over 22,000 daughters.

The Black & White Influence: Tora Triple Threat Lulu EX-96-GMD. While Triple Threat is famous for his red offspring, his influence transcended color lines. Lulu, a Reserve Grand Champion at the Royal Winter Fair, became the dam of the millionaire sire Hanover-Hill Inspiration—proving that Triple Threat’s genetics were powerful enough to shape the mainstream Black & White population just as heavily as the Red.

Tora Triple Threat Lulu EX-96-GMD earned Reserve Grand at the Royal Winter Fair in 1981 and became the dam of Hanover-Hill Inspiration EX-Extra—another millionaire sire used heavily in Black & White populations worldwide. Through Inspiration, Triple Threat’s genetics permeated the mainstream breed, reaching herds that never explicitly sought red genetics.

Hanoverhill TT Roxette-ET EX-94-2E-GMD-DOM introduced the red gene into the legendary Roxy family—widely considered the greatest cow family in Holstein history. The 2012 Red Impact winner, Golden-Oaks Perk Rae-Red, traces back to Roxette—and carries double Triple Threat blood through Jubilant on her dam’s side.

The Polled Pioneer: Golden-Oaks Perk Rae P Red EX-90. A granddaughter of the legendary Roxette, Perk Rae P Red didn’t just carry the Triple Threat legacy of elite type—she pushed the frontier of polled genetics. As a pioneer brood cow, she proved that breeders didn’t have to sacrifice conformation to get the polled gene, laying the groundwork for the modern polled Red market we see today.

And then there’s Sellcrest T Roseanne-Red EX-93-2E-GMD-DOM—40,340 pounds of milk at 4.7% fat with 1,880 pounds of fat. She shattered the stereotype that Red & White cows couldn’t compete on production. When Holstein International ran its 2012 Red Impact Competition—forty years after Triple Threat’s birth—Roseanne still finished sixth. Four decades of relevance.

The reach extended beyond red breeding. Scientific Debutante Rae EX-92—carrying double Triple Threat blood through both Jubilant and the Roxette line—became the dam of Destry-RC, one of the most influential sires in mainstream Black & White populations. Meanwhile, Lulu’s son Hanover-Hill Inspiration achieved millionaire status and was used heavily across the breed worldwide. Triple Threat’s genetics didn’t just build the Red Holstein—they infiltrated the entire Holstein population.

From New York to the World

The impact wasn’t confined to North America. Triple Threat’s genetics became the primary vehicle for “Holsteinization” across Europe—transforming traditional dual-purpose red breeds into specialized dairy cattle.

Schrago Triple Ortensia Red. The proof in the pail. In 1977, ABS Director Dr. Robert Walton (second from right) traveled to Switzerland to see the first milking Triple Threat daughter firsthand—validating the “rogue” purchase made five years earlier. Also pictured with breeder André Schrago are industry leaders from France (Alain Du Colombier) and Germany (Dr. Otto Dramm), marking the start of the European Red revolution.

The Swiss daughter Guex Triple Tulippe-Red achieved something almost unprecedented: EX-98. Nearly perfect. When a disease outbreak at the 1979 Paris Agriculture Show infected her and three other Triple Threat daughters with IBR, Swiss authorities—whose country was free of the disease—demanded immediate slaughter upon their return. Three went to the abattoir. But Tulippe’s genetics were considered too precious to lose. Jean-Louis Schrago arranged for her transfer to Holland, where breeder Anton Van Nieuwenhuize saved her. She lived to age 15—a living advertisement across Europe for the durability and elite type of the Triple Threat bloodline.

The Survivor: Guex Triple Tulippe-Red EX-98. Pictured here upon her arrival in Holland in 1979 with Anton Van Nieuwenhuize (pouring champagne). After contracting IBR at the Paris show, Tulippe was barred from returning to Switzerland and faced immediate slaughter. Instead, she was spirited away to the Netherlands, where she lived to age 15 and became a key figure in convincing Dutch breeders to embrace the Red Holstein crossing program.

But the show ring dominance stretched far beyond Switzerland. Hepp-Haven Lisa of Pinehurst EX-96 earned Reserve Grand Champion at World Dairy Expo in 1986—competing against all colors and holding her own on the biggest stage in the industry. In France, he established the Uzes EX-96 and Rolls EX-96 families—both national champions, with Uzes winning not just the red and white division but the overall national championship against Black & White competition. In Germany, his genetics accelerated the evolution of the German Red Pied into the modern Red Holstein.

The list of remarkable Triple Threat daughters scoring EX-96 or higher across three continents is extraordinary. It’s a testament to how consistently he transmitted elite type regardless of where his genetics landed.

Jean-Louis Schrago’s vision, dismissed by Heffering in 1968, had reshaped an entire continent. But the story doesn’t end with history—it’s still being written today.

What This Means for Your Herd in 2025

Walk through Madison during World Dairy Expo or watch the results coming out of the recent National Red & White Show—Golden-Oaks Temptres-Red taking Grand Champion this year—and you’ll see Triple Threat’s fingerprint everywhere. That’s not nostalgia talking—it’s genetics.

This is Golden-Oaks Temptress-Red-ET—the 2024 World Dairy Expo Supreme Champion who just dethroned a three-time reigning queen. Fifty-two years after Ken Young bet his career on a red calf nobody wanted, a Red & White Holstein stood at the pinnacle of the most prestigious show on earth. That’s the arc of Triple Threat’s legacy. From $60,000 gamble to Supreme Champion crowns. From “cull her, she’s red” to the kind of type that makes judges stop and stare.

Fifty-three years after his birth, his influence isn’t just historical. It’s actively shaping the breed’s future. Modern genomic giants like Hoogerhorst DG OH Rubels-Red carry the Triple Threat bloodline no less than three times in their pedigrees. The Ranger-Red lineage connects directly back. Influential sires like Gywer-RC and Lawn Boy-Red all carry Triple Threat genes. If you’ve been watching the red leaderboards lately, you’re seeing his genetic fingerprint everywhere.

So what’s the lesson here? What should today’s breeders take from Schrago’s vision and Young’s rogue bid?

It’s this: the genetics everyone dismisses today might be the genetics everyone needs tomorrow.

In 1968, Heffering told Schrago there was no market for red cattle. The industry consensus was clear: red was a defect. The smart money said cull those animals and move on. But Schrago saw something different. He saw value where others saw liability. And he was willing to wait—to import semen from Japan, to return year after year, to make the case until the market caught up with his vision.

We’re seeing similar dynamics right now. Breeders banking embryos from A2A2 cows when the premium’s only a nickel. Breeders prioritizing polled genetics when the market hasn’t fully caught up. Breeders maintaining cow families that don’t top the genomic charts but produce consistently year after year—cows that stay in the herd five, six, seven lactations. With feed costs where they are and labor harder to find than ever, that kind of durability isn’t just nice to have; it’s what makes this business sustainable when margins get tight.

Triple Threat proved that patience and conviction, backed by genuine genetic quality, can reshape an entire breed. His daughters weren’t just show winners—they were durable, profitable, long-lasting cows that worked in commercial settings. That combination of type and function, beauty and durability, is exactly what the industry needs now as we balance genomic potential against real-world cow performance.

The Bottom Line

Hanover-Hill Triple Threat-Red was an anomaly who became an archetype. Born from a speculative mating that defied the commercial logic of his time. Purchased for a record price through a rogue bid that could’ve ended Ken Young’s career. Physically compromised for much of his productive life, if the old-timers’ stories are to be believed. Yet he overcame every barrier to reshape an entire breed.

He didn’t merely improve the Red & White cow—he essentially created its modern iteration. By combining the potent Black-Red gene from Telstar with the true recessive red gene and elite type from the Lucky Barb family, he elevated the Red Holstein from a genetic curiosity to a global commercial powerhouse.

His legacy lives in the Speckles and Lulus and Roxettes who dominated their eras. It lives in Tulippe, the Swiss survivor who carried his banner to EX-98. It lives in the Jubilant line that made Apple possible—and in Apple herself, the Million Dollar Cow who would never have been red and white without Triple Threat’s genes flowing through her pedigree. It lives in Destry-RC, carrying his genetics into the mainstream Black & White population. And it lives in breeding programs worldwide, where his genetic fingerprint continues to shape decisions made today.

Every modern Red & White that commands a high price, wins a championship, or tops a genomic index owes a genetic debt to the bull breeders still call “three-legged”—the resilient legend from Hanover Hill.

In the end, Young was right to take the risk. It was easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission. And fifty-three years later, the breed is still thanking him—and Schrago, the Swiss visionary who wouldn’t take no for an answer—for having the courage to see what others couldn’t.

If you’re running red genetics in your herd—or considering adding them—take a minute to trace those pedigrees back. Chances are, you’ll find Triple Threat waiting there. The bull who changed a color. The chameleon who wouldn’t quit. The legend from Hanover Hill who proved that resilience, vision, and elite genetics can rewrite the destiny of an entire breed.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The Rogue Bid: Ken Young exceeded his authorization to buy a red calf that the industry dismissed as a defect. His reported justification—”Easier to ask forgiveness than permission”—became breeding lore. That calf built the modern Red Holstein.
  • Two Genes, One Revolution: Triple Threat uniquely combined Telstar’s Black-Red gene with the Barb family’s true recessive red. For the first time, elite Black & White genetics could reliably produce red offspring.
  • A Daughters Bull: No legacy sons—but his daughters (Speckle, Lulu, Roxette, Roseanne) founded every major Red Holstein dynasty. Apple-Red, Destry-RC, and Rubels-Red all trace back to him.
  • Longevity Is the Legacy: His daughters didn’t just win shows—they lasted 5, 6, 7 lactations. In 2025, with labor tight and turnover costly, that durability is worth more than genomic flash.
  • The Breeder’s Takeaway: The genetics everyone dismisses today might be the genetics everyone needs tomorrow. Schrago waited three years. Young bet his career. Patience plus conviction can reshape an industry.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Lovholm Holsteins: The Only Farm to Breed 2 World Dairy Expo Holstein Champions Milks 72 Cows in Tie-Stalls

Small farm. Big dreams. Historic achievement. How 72 cows beat every Holstein powerhouse on Earth—twice.

Game over. Kandy Cane is crowned Grand Champion at World Dairy Expo. While the banner will hang in the Lambs’ barn, it’s the Lovholm prefix, belonging to a 72-cow farm in Saskatchewan, that’s now etched twice into Holstein history.

Look, I get it. When you hear a tie-stall operation from Saskatchewan—Saskatchewan!—just bred their second World Dairy Expo Grand Champion, your first thought is probably “that can’t be right.” Mine was too.

But here’s what nobody in the industry wants to admit: While their fancy mating programs and big marketing budgets were chasing genomic rabbits down expensive holes, Michael and Jessica Lovich were quietly proving that old-school cow sense still beats computer algorithms.

And while they don’t have the purple banners to show for it—those hang in other people’s barns—they’ve got something better: their prefix in the history books.

The Day That Changed Everything (Again)

October 3, 2025. Michael Lovich was in the stands at World Dairy Expo, his heart feeling like it was gonna pop out of his chest.

You know that spot, right where you can see everything? That’s where he sat, watching Judge Aaron Eaton work through that incredible five-year-old class. You’d think after breeding one WDE champion a decade earlier, he’d have nerves of steel.

Not even close.

“I was probably the most nervous guy in the barn because I was shaking so bad I couldn’t even hold my phone for pictures,” he told me later.

Back home near Balgonie—that’s about 30 minutes east of Regina, for those keeping track—Jessica had given up pretending to eat lunch. She was puttering around the kitchen, laptop streaming the show, while their three daughters huddled around various screens in their car at school. The smell of morning silage still hung in the air from chores, mixing with untouched sandwiches.

School? Yeah, they got permission to skip class. Some things matter more than algebra.

“Somebody tapped me and said, ‘Are you happy?'” Michael recalls about that first pull. “I said, ‘Nope, not until we’re in the final lineup.’ There’s no sitting down until he does his reasons, and we get the nod for first place. It’s only the first pull.”

That’s the difference between people who’ve been there and wannabes. Michael knew that the first pull meant nothing, as he had changed his mind several times earlier in the day. But the judge, Aaron Eaton, had made up his mind, as he would say in his reasons: “When she came in the ring, it was game over.”

And let me tell you, in a class that deep—every single cow could’ve been champion at most other shows—nothing was guaranteed.

The Ornery Heifer Nobody Else Wanted

Here’s the kicker about Kandy Cane: she wasn’t even supposed to be their keeper.

“She was always that cow,” Jessica laughs, and if you’ve ever had one of those in your barn, you know exactly what she means. Born October 20, 2020, headstrong from day one. The kind that makes you check the calendar when she’s due to calve because you know she’ll pick the worst possible night.

They’d actually assigned her as a 4-H project calf to a local town kid. Their own daughters picked different heifers—ones that looked more promising, walked better, didn’t fight you every step to the milk house.

But Jessica’s dad saw something when she was boarding at his place in Alberta: he spotted her out on the pasture as a bred heifer, standing apart from the others, her deep body already showing, even though she was immature.

“He’s like, ‘I really like that heifer. Who is she? What is she? How much do you want for her?'” Jessica remembers.

“She’s not for sale, Dad. She’s got to come home.”

Fast forward to Saskatoon Dairy Expo 2024. Kandy Cane’s being her usual difficult self in the ring—with the Lovichs themselves trying to keep her moving forward. Interested buyers approach with decent offers—we’re talking decent money, the kind that pays for half a year’s worth of grain—but not quite what they were asking.

Then boom—she wins the four-year-old class.

After that win, suddenly everyone wanted to pay. Michael’s response? “That’s like betting on a hockey game and waiting for the third period to be done before you place your bet.”

Price had gone up.

Most walked away. But when the Lambs from Oakfield, New York, finally came calling—after a fateful bus conversation would seal the deal—they paid it.

The handshake was on a bus; the result is in the barn. Kandy Cane settles into her new home at Oakfield Corners in May 2024, beginning the historic partnership between the Lovichs and the Lambs that was built on a shared belief in honest, great-boned cows.

The Partnership That Actually Worked

The real magic started on a bus, of all places.

You know those convention buses—too hot, smells like coffee and exhaustion. Michael found himself sitting next to Jonathan Lamb, heading to a Master Breeder banquet during the 2024 National Holstein Convention.

They got to talking—not about indexes or genomics, but about honest cows. Real cows. The kind that work in anybody’s barn, whether you’re milking in a brand-new rotary or your grandfather’s tie-stalls.

That conversation planted the seed. When the Lambs decided they wanted Kandy Cane after Saskatoon, the relationship was already there. The trust was built.

“The coolest part of the whole Kandy Cane story?” Jessica tells me. “We gained a friendship out of the deal.”

The result of a partnership built on trust. Here, Lovhill Sidekick Kandy Cane displays the championship ‘bloom’ she gained under the expert care of Jonathan and Alicia Lamb, winning at the Northeast Spring National Show—a powerful preview of the history she was about to make.

Under the Lambs’ management, with Jamie Black finally getting his hands on the halter, Kandy Cane transformed. She filled out, gained that bloom that separates good cows from champions. The kind of condition where the hair shines like silk, and every step looks purposeful.

But here’s what matters: she stayed honest.

The Breeding Philosophy Nobody Wants to Hear

The matriarchal link: Lovhill Gold Karat (EX-95). As Kandy Cane’s grandam and Katrysha’s full sister, her influence runs deep through the Lovholm herd. She’s a living testament to why the Lovichs prioritize proven genetics and cow sense over chasing the latest genomic numbers.

“Genomics? What are those?” Michael jokes when I ask about his breeding strategy.

Except it’s not really a joke.

“Cow families are probably number one,” Michael states flatly. “If I don’t like the cow family the bull comes from, we won’t use him. When I see bulls that are out of three unscored dams, I don’t care what the numbers are.”

Think about that for a second. In October 2025, when we have genomic testing on 10 million cattle globally and everyone’s breeding for indexes that change every four months, these individuals are breeding the way their parents (Ev and Marylee Simanton and Garry and Dianne Lovich) and their closest mentors taught them twenty years ago.

And they’re beating everyone.

The Lovichs’ cows typically have an average productive lifespan of 8-10 years. Industry average? Four to five, if you’re lucky. That’s five extra years of milk checks versus the cost of replacement. Do the math on that ROI—it’s not about peak lactation, it’s about lifetime profitability.

Saskatchewan: The Last Place You’d Look (Which Is Why It Works)

When Michael and Jessica left Alberta in 2015 to buy Prairie Diamond Farm, people thought they were crazy. Leaving established dairy country for… Saskatchewan?

The succession plan with Michael’s parents hadn’t worked out. “We don’t dwell on it,” Jessica says diplomatically. “And you know what? Maybe it was the best move that could have ever happened to us.”

Saskatchewan offered something unexpected: freedom to farm their way.

The Dairy Entrant Assistance Program gave them 20 kilos of free quota if they matched it. The Strudwick farm was available, and they were seeking someone to carry on their legacy.

“People think we’re out here on the prairies completely alone,” Jessica explains. “But there’s 10 or 12 of us that are quite close together. We help each other. And a three-hour drive to go visit a friend? That’s nothing.”

Long before their second World Champion, the Lovichs were already being recognized for their vision. Pictured here after being named Saskatchewan’s 2021 Outstanding Young Farmers, it was proof their risky move from Alberta had blossomed into a model of agricultural success.

Here’s what gets me: 72 cows in tie-stalls. Every cow gets individual attention. Nobody’s pushing for 40,000-pound lactations that burn cows out by third calving.

They’re growing as much of their own feed as possible on 500 acres. Selling some straw and compost to neighbors. Building a sustainable operation that works with the land, not against it.

Three Daughters and the Farm’s Future

The Lovich girls—Reata, Renelle, and Raelyn—aren’t just farm kids. They’re the next generation of this breeding philosophy.

“It’s a matter of survival around here,” Jessica laughs. “If you’re not in the barn doing chores, you’re in the kitchen cooking supper.”

Reata’s planning to be the farm vet. Renelle will handle the cropping. Raelyn? She’s already declared herself future farm manager “because she knows all the cows already.”

They’ve got their own cattle—including a Jersey their Uncle Jon and Auntie Sandy sent for Christmas. “Now I’ve got to keep Jersey semen in the tank,” Michael grumbles, but you can see he’s proud.

When Kandy Cane won at Expo?  They were crying, they were laughing, they were super excited,” Jessica recalls. “They’ve been coming with me to shows since they were born. They’ve slept on hay bales at shows for 14, 16 years.”

These kids aren’t learning dairy from textbooks. They’re learning it at 5 a.m. before school, one cow at a time.

The heart of Lovholm Holsteins: Michael, Jessica, Reata, Renelle, and Raelyn Lovich. These three daughters represent the next generation carrying forward a breeding philosophy that prioritizes cow sense, hard work, and faith over fads, ensuring the farm’s future.

The Faith Component Nobody Talks About

“You can’t take any of this with you when you leave this earth,” Jessica says, and she means it. “But all of it can be taken from you in an instant. So every day, we just give God the glory.”

It is evident in how they conduct business. They price cattle fairly. Sell to people who’ll treat them right. Maintain relationships long after cheques clear.

When Jessica mentions that Jonathan Lamb “just happened” to sit next to Michael on that bus? She sees providence.

Either way, it worked.

The Numbers That Should Terrify Every Mega-Dairy

Let’s talk brass tacks. In a 72-cow herd, the Lovichs have built this:

LOVHOLM BY THE NUMBERS:

  • 19 Multiple Excellent cows
  • 14 Excellent
  • 38 Very Good
  • 11 Good Plus
  • 2025: 1 Super 3
    • 12 Superior Lactations
    • 12 * Brood Cows
    • 11 Longtime production awards, including 1- 120 000kg 
  • Average productive life: 8-10 years (vs. 4-5 industry average)
  • 2 World Dairy Expo Grand Champions bred
  • 72 total milking cows

Bulls like Sidekick were used—not because of genomics, but because “he had what we figured we needed.”

That’s the difference. They’re breeding for their barn, their management, their future. Not for some index that’ll change next proof run.

What This Really Means (The Part That’ll Piss People Off)

Two World Dairy Expo Grand Champions from one prefix. Nobody else has done it.

Not the operations that have been breeding Holsteins for 100 years. Not the genetic companies with donor programs. Not the show string specialists.

A 72-cow tie-stall farm in Saskatchewan did it. Twice.

The industry’s consolidating faster than ever. Three farms close daily, while mega-dairies expand. Operations with 2,500+ cows control nearly half of milk production.

But when you can breed cows that last twice as long? Your economics change completely.

Lower overhead. Fewer replacements. Less transition cow drama.

Suddenly, that 72-cow operation doesn’t look so backward.

The Morning After Nothing Changed (Everything Changed)

The morning after Kandy Cane won, Jessica was back in the barn at 5 a.m. with the girls. Michael was still in Madison, probably hadn’t slept.

But back home? Same 72 cows needing milked. Same routine.

“For all the acclaim we have, we still don’t have a grand champion banner hanging anywhere on our farm,” Jessica points out.

No bitterness. Just a fact.

The first of two. Lovhill Goldwyn Katrysha’s historic win at the 2015 World Dairy Expo. Her victory put the Lovholm prefix on the map and set the stage for her herdmate, Kandy Cane, to make them the only breeders in history to achieve this twice.

Both champions’ banners hang in other people’s barns. Kandy Cane’s purple and gold heads to New York. Katrysha’s from 2015? Hangs proudly at MilkSource Genetics.

They bred Holstein history twice, but don’t have the banners. Because sometimes you sell your best to keep the lights on. That’s dairy farming in 2025.

But breeding great cattle is its own reward. The Lovholm name in those pedigrees? Worth more than any banner.

So What’s Next?

“Is there a third one coming?” I had to ask.

Jessica laughed. “We always got to dream bigger, right?”

Then she got serious: “We want to keep breeding functional cows. Cows we enjoy milking. Cows that can maybe have a little bit of fun at shows.”

Not world-beaters. Not genomic wonders.

Functional cows.

And that’s exactly why they’ll probably breed another champion.

The Lesson Nobody Wants to Learn

Here’s what bothers me: We all know this story. Small farm beats big guys. David and Goliath, dairy edition.

We love these stories at Expo, standing around at 2 a.m. with a beer, talking about the good old days.

But come Monday morning? We go right back to chasing the newest index. The hottest sire. The genomic flavor of the month.

The Lovichs aren’t just breeding better cows. They’re proving there’s another way.

Not backwards. Different. Focused on what actually matters when you’re trying to make a living milking cows.

You want to know why a 72-cow farm just schooled the entire Holstein industry?

Because they were actually farming. Not playing a genetic lottery. Not building cow factories. Farming.

And twice now, when the best cattle in the world stood in Madison, their way won.

The Walk We All Need to Take

The longest walk isn’t from barn to show ring. It’s from yesterday’s assumptions to tomorrow’s reality.

Michael and Jessica Lovich have walked it twice. With Saskatchewan stubbornness and the radical belief that good cows, raised right, still matter most.

The question isn’t whether they’ll breed a third champion. They probably will.

The question is whether the rest of us will finally realize what they’ve been showing us: Sometimes the future of dairy farming looks a lot like its past.

Just with better cattle, stronger families, and the courage to trust what you see in your barn more than what you read on a screen.

And if a 72-cow farm from Saskatchewan can breed two World Champions by ignoring what everyone else is doing, maybe we’ve all been looking in the wrong places.

KEY TAKEAWAYS 

  • First in History: Lovholm is the ONLY prefix to breed 2 World Dairy Expo Holstein Grand Champions—from a 72-cow tie-stall operation in Saskatchewan
  • Longevity = Profitability: Their 8-10-year productive average vs. the industry standard of 4-5 means 2x the lifetime profit per cow. Do that math on your replacements.
  • Banners vs. Legacy: They sold both champions to survive and don’t own the banners—but “Lovholm” in those pedigrees forever proves that excellence transcends ownership
  • Your Wake-Up Call: If a 72-cow farm can beat every unlimited-budget operation twice, maybe it’s time to stop looking at screens and start looking at cows

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What farmers are discovering through the Lovich story: everything you think you know about breeding champions is wrong. Michael and Jessica Lovich just became the first and only breeders to produce TWO different World Dairy Expo Holstein Grand Champions—from a 72-cow tie-stall operation in Saskatchewan. They achieved this by completely rejecting genomics in favor of cow families and visual appraisal, the same approach their parents taught them 20 years ago. Their cows average 8-10 productive years, versus the industry standard of 4-5, transforming the economics of their operation through longevity rather than peak production. Despite having to sell both champions to keep their farm afloat (the banners hang in other barns), the Lovholm prefix now stands alone in Holstein history. While the industry consolidates into mega-dairies chasing quarterly genomic updates, this couple proved that 72 cows, managed right, can beat operations with unlimited budgets—twice.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend