Archive for Dry Matter Intake

Why “Crowded Cows” Are a Growing Concern: The Impact on Dairy Farm Production

Uncover the obscured expenses associated with “crowded cows” in agriculture and animal welfare. What repercussions does this practice have on our food supply and the health of livestock?

Overcrowding in dairy production, sometimes called ‘crowded cows,’ has become a significant worry for agricultural communities. Farmers must prioritize herd care and enhance productivity to meet the increased demand for dairy products. Overcrowding harms cow health, reducing farm output and sustainability. It causes sickness, stress, inefficiencies in milk production, and greater death rates. Stress and lack of relaxation may lead to a 10% loss in milk supply, costing a farm up to $50,000 per year. However, tackling ‘packed cows’ and encouraging sustainable and humane dairy farming may help livestock and livelihoods while increasing the dairy industry’s economic sustainability.

The Consequences of Spatial Overload in Dairy Farming 

Cow DensityNumber of Stalls per Cow
Low (<80% stocking)1.2
Moderate (80%-100% stocking)1.0
High (>100% stocking)0.8

Crowded cows occur when the number of animals exceeds the required space for their health, production, and well-being. This problem stems from a lack of bunk space, resting locations, and restricted supplies such as water and food. A dairy cow requires around one stall. For pasture operations, they need about 120 square feet per cow. Exceeding this limit has negative repercussions, including increased resource competition, reduced dry matter intake (DMI), and decreased milk production. However, farmers may dramatically increase their herds’ well-being and productivity by emphasizing cow comfort and following these geographical guidelines.

The Impact of Overcrowding on Dairy Cow Welfare: Stress, Health, and Behavioral Issues 

MetricOptimal ConditionsOvercrowded ConditionsPercentage Difference
Milk Production (liters/day)2518-28%
Incidence of Mastitis (%)10%30%+200%
Average Longevity (years)64-33%
Feed Conversion Efficiency1.51.2-20%

Overcrowded circumstances harm dairy cows’ welfare, causing physical pain and other issues. Competition for food and rest places leads to elevated stress levels, which may weaken immune function and increase susceptibility to illnesses like mastitis and respiratory infections. Crowded herds might lead to behavioral difficulties. Cows become more aggressive as they fight for space, inflicting injuries and disrupting herd peace. Stress and dissatisfaction may cause aberrant repeated behaviors like frequent licking and pacing, indicating significant welfare inadequacies.

Overcrowding FactorImpact on Milk Production
Increased Competition for FoodDecreased nutrient intake, leading to lower milk yield
Elevated Stress LevelsReduction in milk quality due to hormonal imbalances
Limited Resting SpaceReduced time for necessary rest and rumination, impacting milk production
Poor VentilationHigher susceptibility to respiratory diseases, adversely affecting milk yield.

The Ripple Effect: From Stress to Severe Health Complications in Dairy Cows 

Overcrowding has significant health consequences beyond acute stress, including lameness, mastitis, and respiratory difficulties. These circumstances jeopardize dairy cows’ well-being and production while imposing significant economic expenses on producers. Lameness, caused by extended standing on hard surfaces and little rest owing to restricted space, hinders movement and lowers feeding, influencing nutrition and energy intake, both of which are critical for milk production. Poor mobility might lead to increased stress and decreased milk supply.

Mastitis, an inflammatory illness of the udder, is aggravated by overcrowding, significantly when hygiene standards deteriorate owing to overpopulation. This illness lowers milk quality and quantity, needing expensive veterinarian interventions and lengthy therapies. Respiratory problems are common in overcrowded barns with poor ventilation, promoting diseases that quickly spread across the herd and reduce output. Chronic respiratory difficulties often result in higher culling rates, lowering each animal’s lifetime and return on investment.

Finally, these health conditions considerably impair dairy cows’ productivity and lifetime, resulting in lower milk output, medical costs, and profitability. Overcrowding poses health risks that must be addressed to maintain a healthy dairy enterprise.

Compromised Milk Production: The Immediate Impact of Overcrowding 

Overcrowding LevelMilk Production (lbs/day)Impact on Production (%)
Optimal Conditions70 lbs0%
10% Overcrowded67 lbs-4.3%
20% Overcrowded64 lbs-8.6%
30% Overcrowded60 lbs-14.3%

Dairy overpopulation’s most immediate consequences are decreased milk output and quality. Keeping cows in confined quarters reduces their daily dry matter intake (DMI), resulting in inadequate nutritional absorption for optimum milk production. Cow rivalry intensifies with limited bunk space, prompting some to eat less feed. 

Overcrowding triggers deep physiological stress reactions. Stress causes the production of cortisol, a hormone that disrupts reproductive systems and immunological responses. Chronic stress limits the release of oxytocin, which is required for milk letdown, reducing milk quantity and quality.

Furthermore, tight confinement raises the risk of physical injuries and infections such as mastitis, which directly affects milk safety and quality. Cows that lack enough room are more likely to lie in damp or filthy circumstances, increasing the risk of pathogen exposure and milk contamination.

Finally, producers must maintain an ideal group size, ensuring that cows spend less time in holding pens and have easy access to feeding places. Balancing herd size and facility capacity improves cow comfort and productivity, ensuring milk output and quality.

The Unseen Burden: Environmental Stressors Aggravating Dairy Cow Overcrowding 

Environmental factors enhance the impact of overpopulation in dairy farms. Poor ventilation may quickly raise ammonia and toxic gasses, aggravating cow respiratory systems and exacerbating illnesses like pneumonia. Inadequate bedding exacerbates this problem, producing comfort issues, foot abnormalities, and increased mastitis rates owing to unsanitary surroundings. Overcrowding often results in restricted availability of food and water, affecting feeding activity and dry matter intake (DMI). Dairy cows need a balanced diet and constant water supply for maximum health and output. Due to limited bunk space, fewer cows can eat the appropriate feed, resulting in decreased DMI, poor body condition, and restricted milk output. This creates a loop in which stressed, undernourished cows are more prone to sickness, lowering herd output. Farmers must manage herd numbers so that each cow has enough room, resources, and comfort. Strategic planning and management are essential for reducing environmental stresses. Addressing these concerns is critical for animal welfare and sustainable dairy production operations.

The Economic Ramifications of Overcrowding in Dairy Farms: A Deep Dive into Profitability and Sustainability 

Economic CostDescriptionEstimated Financial Impact
Veterinary CostsIncreased frequency of disease and illness due to stress and inadequate living conditions$50 – $100 per cow annually
Feed EfficiencyHigher competition for feed leads to inefficient feeding practices and uneven weight gain5% – 15% increase in feed costs
Milk Yield and QualityReduced milk production and quality, leading to lower market prices2% – 10% drop in revenue
Infrastructure MaintenanceAccelerated wear and tear on facilities due to higher occupancy$200 – $500 annually
Labor CostsIncreased need for labor to manage overcrowded conditions and stressed animalsAdditional $10,000 – $15,000 annually per farm

Overcrowding on dairy farms substantially influences the industry’s profitability beyond just animal welfare concerns. Crowded circumstances increase veterinarian expenditures due to mastitis, lameness, and respiratory problems. These health issues raise veterinarian expenditures and result in continuous costs for chronic illnesses.

Overcrowding has a direct effect on milk output. Stressed cows consume less, resulting in reduced milk output. Studies indicate that adjusting bunk space and group sizes helps sustain milk production levels. For example, moving a herd from one to two groups may boost fat-corrected milk (FCM) by 1% to 3%. Reduced milk production immediately affects the farm’s capacity to satisfy supply obligations, perhaps resulting in financial fines or lost business.

Furthermore, overcrowding may harm a dairy farm’s image in a market where customers increasingly demand ethically produced goods. Farms notorious for poor animal care may lose their competitive advantage, resulting in lower sales and perhaps expensive marketing attempts to improve their public image.

Regulatory Frameworks and Ethical Considerations: The Backbone of Humane Dairy Farming Practices 

To address overpopulation in dairy farms, it’s important to consider regulatory frameworks and ethical principles for animal care. Several jurisdictions have enacted regulations to reduce overcrowding and safeguard the health of dairy cattle. These restrictions prioritize humane procedures, including enough space, nourishment, and general animal well-being. The Animal Welfare Act in several nations ensures humane treatment by promoting natural behaviors and well-being. Guidelines frequently specify stocking density limitations to minimize overpopulation. The European Union’s farm animal welfare regulation establishes minimum space requirements and feed and water availability. Organizations like the American Dairy Science Association and the World Organization for Animal Health recommend best practices beyond legal standards, such as providing enough bunk space and reducing pen time. These criteria emphasize the ethical need to balance production and a healthy animal living environment. Noncompliance may result in penalties, license revocation, and reputational harm. Ethical farming techniques prioritize animal care and promote the sustainability and economic viability of the dairy sector.

Proactive Solutions and Best Practices to Address Overcrowding in Dairy Farms 

Improved management approaches are critical for addressing dairy farm congestion. Herd size has to be carefully planned, and cow behavior and health must be monitored. Data analytics can identify ideal group sizes based on feeding activity, milk output, and space availability.

Investing in improved housing facilities with enough sleeping space and rest places decreases stress and health problems. Flexible group size, in line with parlor capacity and holding pen time, ensures efficiency and comfort.

Adherence to animal welfare standards, as set by the Animal Welfare Institute and Michigan State University, promotes a compassionate and successful agricultural environment. Meeting these requirements improves cow welfare, farm sustainability, and customer confidence in dairy products.

The Bottom Line

Overcrowding in dairy farming has profound implications that must be addressed immediately. Overcrowding increases stress, health difficulties, and behavioral problems, lowering milk supply and affecting animal welfare and economic returns. Environmental factors exacerbate these difficulties. Herd density management is critical for both long-term sustainability and profitability. Optimizing welfare and economic viability requires correct grouping tactics, lowering group variance, and improving facility design and administration. Compliance with regulatory and ethical norms is vital for humane and sustainable activities. Our job is to improve procedures that benefit the animals and the industry. These methods balance production and animal care, promoting long-term profitability and sustainability in dairy farming.

Key Takeaways:

  • Proper spatial management in dairy farming is crucial for the well-being and productivity of dairy cows.
  • Overcrowding leads to increased stress, health issues, and behavioral problems among dairy cows.
  • The ripple effect of stress from overcrowding can escalate into severe health complications.
  • One immediate impact of overcrowding is a notable decline in milk production.
  • Environmental stressors can exacerbate the negative effects of overcrowding on dairy cows.
  • Overcrowding has significant economic ramifications, affecting profitability and sustainability of dairy farms.
  • Regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations are fundamental to implementing humane farming practices.
  • Adopting proactive solutions and best practices can effectively address the issue of overcrowding in dairy farms.

Summary:

Overcrowding in dairy production, also known as ‘crowded cows,’ is a significant issue that affects cow health, farm output, and sustainability. It can lead to sickness, stress, inefficiencies in milk production, and increased death rates. Overcrowding can cost farms up to $50,000 per year. To address this issue, farmers should focus on sustainable and humane dairy farming and follow geographical guidelines. The recommended number of stalls per cow is 120 square feet or one stall. Exceeding this limit can lead to increased resource competition, reduced dry matter intake, and decreased milk production. Farmers can improve their herds’ well-being and productivity by emphasizing cow comfort and following geographical guidelines. Overcrowding conditions also cause physical pain, competition for food and rest places, elevated stress levels, limited resting space, and poor ventilation. These factors lead to increased competition for food, decreased nutrient intake, reduced milk quality due to hormonal imbalances, and respiratory diseases. Overcrowding triggers physiological stress reactions, leading to the production of cortisol and limited release of oxytocin, reducing milk quantity and quality. Proactive solutions to address overcrowding include improved management approaches, careful planning of herd size, monitoring cow behavior and health, investing in improved housing facilities, and adhering to animal welfare standards set by organizations like the Animal Welfare Institute and Michigan State University.

Learn more:

Shorter or No Dry Periods: A New Frontier in Dairy Cow Management

Learn how reducing or removing the dry period in dairy cows can boost their health and milk production. Could this method enhance your herd’s performance?

Stalveen in de stal van Gerard Hoogland

The conventional 60-day dry period is critical for treating preclinical mastitis, preparing cows for lactation, and promoting mammary cell regeneration in dairy cow management. Could we cut or remove this period?

New methods are reconsidering the dry time and potentially revolutionizing dairy production. Research on Holstein cows comparing conventional, short, and no dry periods, conducted with an exact, data-driven approach, revealed significant increases in dry matter intake (DMI), milk output, and plasma glucose levels. A glucogenic diet rich in maize has further improved energy balance and lowered plasma beta-hydroxybutyric acid (BHVA), reducing the risk of ketosis. The potential to customize dry times based on body condition score (BCS) and milk production capacity offers a promising approach to balancing metabolic health and milk output. During mid-to-late lactation, targeted dietary plans can help cows avoid gaining weight during reduced or no dry spells. Post-peak lactation energy density and food composition management can assist farmers in maintaining lactation persistence and preventing excessive fat formation. These techniques underscore the potential for an exact, data-driven approach to dairy cow management, offering reassurance about the scientific rigor of the research and its potential to improve health, production, and financial feasibility.

Does a dairy revolution seem imminent? Should we abolish the traditional dry period? This work investigates the effects of different dry periods on energy balance, metabolic health, and general dairy production.

Reevaluating the Traditional 60-Day Dry Period: A New Frontier in Dairy Cow Management 

Analyzing the traditional 60-day dry time exposes compelling reasons for either lowering or doing away with it to enhance dairy cow performance and health. Research indicates these adjustments may increase milk output, control energy distribution, and minimize metabolic problems like subclinical ketosis. Dairy farmers may maintain a favorable energy balance by changing dietary control—especially the combination of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates. A glucogenic diet, rich in starch, such as maize, helps balance the negative energy. It reduces ketone body synthesis, avoiding subclinical ketosis.

Eliminating the dry season might be difficult. Overweight cows run the danger of developing metabolic problems, compromising herd health and production. Moreover, the persistence of lactation might be compromised. Maintaining constant production depends on enough dietary energy and nutritional composition from peak milk output forward. However, careful management of dietary energy and composition can mitigate these risks, ensuring a smooth transition to a no-dry-period schedule.

Lack of a conventional dry time may affect mammary cell renewal, influencing udder health. Adapting to no-dry-period schedules depends on factors such as breed, genetic potential, and body condition score (BCS). For instance, high-producing breeds with a higher BCS may require a longer dry period to maintain their health and productivity. Customized dry spells might cause possible declines in milk sales; these should be balanced against lower illness expenses and better reproductive efficiency.

Although cutting the dry period has metabolic advantages, it requires a whole strategy. Dairy managers must use calculated nutrition changes and monitor cow body condition to maximize health advantages and lower dangers. This includes implementing advanced feeding techniques such as precision feeding, where the diet is tailored to the cow’s specific needs based on its production stage and body condition. It also involves customized cow management plans, which may include more frequent health checks and closer monitoring of milk production and body condition scores. Implementing this creative strategy effectively depends mostly on advanced feeding techniques and customized cow management plans.

Constant modifications in feed energy level and nutritional composition are essential when cows migrate from optimum milk yield. Reducing dietary energy might prevent needless fattening and help induce lactation persistence. This method requires an advanced understanding of every cow’s genetic potential, breed, and BCS.

Eventually, by carefully reducing or eliminating the dry time, dairy farmers have a fresh approach to improving cow health, guaranteeing constant milk supply, and maximizing lactation management. However, conventional 60-day dry cycles have long-standing worth; modern diets provide more flexible, health-conscious choices.

Optimizing Energy Balance: Transforming the Traditional Dry Period for Better Metabolic Health

The standard 60-day dry period significantly enhances dairy cows’ energy balance and metabolic health. However, reducing or eliminating this period could offer substantial benefits by further optimizing these aspects. The conventional dry season causes notable energy demand changes that result in negative energy balance (NEB) and conditions including subclinical ketosis. Reducing this interval helps distribute energy more fairly, supporting a stable energy balance and reducing severe NEB and related problems such as hepatic lipidosis.

Shorter dry period studies of cows show improved metabolic markers, including lower plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) and beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHVA), both of which are vital indications of improved energy balance and decreased risk of ketosis. Rich in maize post-calving, a glucogenic meal increases glucose availability, promoting energy usage and reducing ketone body synthesis. Improved energy efficiency helps with weight management and raises body condition score (BCS), which is essential for well-being and fertility and produces shorter calving intervals.

Promoting continuous lactation and removing the dry phase helps normalize energy production, matching the cow’s natural metabolic cycle and lowering metabolic stress. This reduces underfeeding in early lactation and overfeeding in late lactation, producing constant milk outputs and consistent lactation persistency.

Precision in Nutrition: Mastering the Dietary Balancing Act for Shortened or No Dry Periods 

Shorter or no dry spells need careful food control as well. Navigating the metabolic hurdles of this strategy requires an exact mix of proteins, lipids, and carbs. For instance, increasing the maize intake in the diet increases the energy availability via glucose precursors, avoiding too negative energy balance and lowering the risk of subclinical ketosis.

Diets intense in simple sugars and extra fats should be avoided because of their poor effectiveness for glucogenesis. Simple sugars cause fast increases and decreases in blood sugar levels, upsetting the energy balance even if they provide instant energy. Usually kept as body fat instead of being turned into glucose, excess extra fats have less impact on maintaining steady energy levels during early breastfeeding. Instead, emphasizing balanced carbohydrates like starch-rich maize will help dairy cows preserve energy and metabolic wellness. Changing dietary contents and energy levels from peak milk production forward helps manage lactation persistence and body condition. Customizing meal programs depending on individual cows provides optimal health and production considering the breed, genetic potential, and body condition score. Effective dairy management with either less or no dry spells requires proactive nutritional stewardship, which enhances metabolic health and preserves milk output.

A Glucogenic Diet: The Keystone to Metabolic Wellness and Energy Optimization in Dairy Cows 

An early lactation glucogenic diet is crucial for maintaining metabolic health and enhancing energy balance in dairy cows. This diet includes more maize, which is high in starch. It increases glucose precursors, therefore supporting glucogenesis and guaranteeing a consistent glucose supply. Early lactation, when cows are susceptible to negative energy balance (NEB), makes this especially crucial.

Preventing NEB is crucial as it lowers the risk of metabolic diseases, including ketosis, which could cause lower milk production and worse reproductive function. A glucogenic diet regulates blood glucose levels and encourages practical energy usage, lowering ketone body generation and preserving metabolic health.

Including extra maize in the diet also helps solve the lower feed intake during the close-up stage, which results from the growing uterine size. This guarantees cows have enough nutrients without undesired metabolic problems or weight increases. In dairy herds, such customized nutritional control enables optimum lactation performance and lifespan.

Balancing Act: Navigating the Risks and Rewards of No Dry Periods

Among the possible advantages of reconsidering dry periods, solving the problems related to the no dry period strategy is essential. Cows run the danger of growing obese without a break and of having lower lactation persistence in the subsequent cycles. This situation emphasizes the need to change dietary energy intake and nutritional content precisely from phases of maximum milk output forward. Dairy management may extend lactation by carefully reducing dietary energy intake post-peak production, preventing unwanted fattening. Customizing dry period treatment to maintain metabolic health and milk production efficiency depends on holistic factors, including genetic potential, breed variety, and body condition score (BCS).

Reassessing Milk Yield: The Challenges and Opportunities of Shortening or Omitting the Dry Period 

Reducing or eliminating the dry phase can provide the potential for milk production as well as problems. Although a 60-day dry period traditionally increases milk supply later, current studies show essential effects from changing this interval. While complete deletion may cause a 3.5% decline in milk output, shortening it might result in a 3% decline. This requires a calculated strategy for changing the dry period.

Furthermore, the consequences of primiparous and multiparous cows are different. First-lactation cows had additional lactating days and showed no drop in milk output when the dry period was reduced. By contrast, multiparous cows had gains in fertility and shorter calving intervals but suffered more production declines. This shows the requirement of tailored dry period plans depending on every cow’s lactation history and metabolic condition.

Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency: The Fertility Benefits of Shortened or Eliminated Dry Periods in Multiparous Cows

ParameterTraditional 60-Day Dry PeriodShortened Dry Period (30 Days)No Dry Period
Days to First Postpartum Estrus604540
Days Open120110100
Services per Conception3.02.52.2
Calving Interval (days)400380360

Shorter calving intervals result from higher fertility, shown by multiparous cows with reduced or abolished dry spells. This leads to a more sensitive and efficient reproductive cycle. Maintaining a stable and healthy herd helps the shorter time between calvings increase milk production and general farm output.

Metabolic Precision: Harnessing Customized Dry Periods for Optimal Health and Milk Yield in High-Yielding Dairy Cows

Modifying dry period durations offers one major benefit, especially for elderly or high-yielding cows prone to severe negative energy balance (NEB): improving metabolism and retaining milk output. High-yielding cows have great metabolic needs and, if improperly cared for, run a higher risk of problems. Cutting the dry time may help these cows maintain a better energy balance, thereby lowering their risk of illnesses like ketosis.

This strategy has many advantages. It helps to avoid the energy deficit that damages health and output by redistributing energy to suit the demands of late lactation and the transition phase. Reduced dry periods also improve metabolic efficiency, thus ensuring cows have sufficient power for upkeep and output without draining their bodily reserves.

Moreover, a customized dry duration helps to sustain the milk supply, preventing the notable drop seen with more extended dry periods. The more consistent and continuous milk supply resulting from this helps control herd dynamics and maximize milk sales.

Matching food plans with these tailored dry spells is very vital. Balanced in calorie content and rich in glucogenic precursors, nutrient-dense meals help the metabolic shift, improving well-being and output. This satisfies immediate metabolic demands and enhances reproductive function, reducing calving intervals and improving fertility results.

Modern dairy management’s strategic approach for reconciling metabolic health with production targets is customizing dry period durations. This guarantees the best performance of high-yielding dairy cows across their lactation cycles.

Assessing Economic Trade-offs: The Financial Implications of Customized Dry Periods in Dairy Management

CategoryTraditional 60-Day Dry PeriodShortened Dry PeriodNo Dry Period
Milk Yield Reduction0%3%3.5%
Feed CostHighModerateLow
Incidence of Metabolic DisordersHighModerateLow
Veterinary CostsHighModerateLow
Body Condition Score (BCS)OptimalVariableHigh
Labor CostsModerateLowLow
Overall Economic ViabilityModerateHighVariable

Analyzing the cost-benefit of tailored dry times means comparing the slight loss in milk sales, usually between 3% and 3.5%, against lower illness expenses. Although this would affect milk revenue, the strategic benefits would exceed losses.

One significant advantage is the savings in illness expenses. Thanks to improved energy balance and metabolic health from tailored dry spells, healthier cows suffer fewer metabolic diseases like subclinical ketosis. This lowers veterinarian and labor costs, as well as potential milk production losses brought on by disease. Improved metabolic health also increases fertility, reduces calving intervals, and enhances reproductive efficiency, raising long-term economic rewards.

Financial effects vary depending on the farm; variables like herd size, baseline health, and economic situation affect them. While a milk output drop is a cost, reduced veterinary bills and less sickness can save substantial money, improving overall profitability. Thus, tailored dry intervals are a reasonable approach, as lower illness expenses might balance or even exceed income lost from reduced milk supply

Consider this scenario with a Wisconsin dairy farm using a no-dry season approach for their 200-cow herd. A notable drop in veterinarian expenses and a decrease in subclinical ketosis cases helped to offset worries about lower milk output. Reduced medical costs and more regular milk output helped the farm to show a 12% increase in net profitability over one year.

Another instance in California was when dry time was reduced to thirty days. Maximizing energy at various lactation phases saves feed expenditures. It provides a 7% rise in cow body condition score, lower metabolic problems, and more excellent total lifetime milk supply. These changes demonstrate how economically beneficial adapting dry spells may be, surpassing first declines in milk output.

These practical examples highlight the possible financial benefits of changing the duration of the dry period and underline the need for careful supervision and customized dietary plans to offset or transform the economic effects.

Striking a Balance: University of Idaho’s Study on Dry Period Lengths and Their Implications for High-Producing Dairy Cows

University of Idaho scientists investigated the effects of either reducing or removing the dry period in high-producing dairy cows. While conventional 60-day dry intervals produced peak milk outputs surpassing 99 pounds per day for primiparous cows and 110 pounds per day for multipurpose cows, shorter or no dry periods improved energy balance and metabolic health at the expense of lowered milk yield. This work underlines the difficult equilibrium between preserving milk output in dairy management and enhancing metabolic health.

The Bottom Line

Dairy cows depend critically on the conventional 60-day dry season, although new research calls for its change. Reducing or eliminating this phase, especially in high-yielding cows, may improve energy balance and metabolic health. Key to this approach is a glucogenic diet high in maize to support energy demands during early breastfeeding and lower chances of negative energy balance and subclinical ketosis. By the conclusion of lactation, this method raises body condition scores. It enhances reproductive efficiency even if milk output somewhat decreases.

Reevaluating the dry phase involves strategic milk production reallocation and exact dietary changes to maintain metabolic health. This approach maximizes general well-being and production, improving metabolic conditions and reproductive performance. Dairy farmers may guarantee cows a good energy balance by carefully controlling the mix of carbs, lipids, and proteins, encouraging consistent milk output and supporting long-term health.

Key Takeaways:

  • Halving or eliminating the conventional 60-day dry period can significantly improve energy balance and metabolic health in dairy cows.
  • This strategy can lead to potential increases in bodyweight and condition score by the end of lactation.
  • Glucogenic diets, richer in starch like those incorporating more corn, support better energy balance and reduce the risk of metabolic disorders such as subclinical ketosis.
  • Avoiding high levels of supplemental fat and simple sugars in the diet is crucial for promoting glucogenesis.
  • Adjusting dietary energy levels from peak milk yield can help stimulate lactation persistency and prevent cows from becoming overweight in later lactation stages.
  • Primiparous cows show no impact on milk yield from shortened dry periods but benefit from an increased number of lactating days.
  • Multiparous cows experience improved fertility and shorter calving intervals with shortened or no dry periods.
  • Customized dry period lengths for older or high-yielding cows can mitigate milk yield reductions and enhance metabolic health.
  • Lower milk yields with shortened or omitted dry periods need to be weighed against reduced disease costs and improved metabolic health.
  • Research indicates that targeted nutritional adjustments are essential to optimize outcomes with shortened or eliminated dry periods.

Summary: The traditional 60-day dry period is crucial for dairy cow management, treating preclinical mastitis, preparing cows for lactation, and promoting mammary cell regeneration. However, new methods are reconsidering the dry time and potentially revolutionizing dairy production. Research on Holstein cows comparing conventional, short, and no dry periods revealed significant increases in dry matter intake, milk output, and plasma glucose levels. A glucogenic diet rich in maize has further improved energy balance and lowered plasma beta-hydroxybutyric acid (BHVA), reducing the risk of ketosis. Customizing dry times based on body condition score and milk production capacity offers a promising approach to balancing metabolic health and milk output. Targeted dietary plans during mid-to-late lactation can help avoid weight gain during reduced or no dry spells. Customized nutritional control during the close-up stage ensures cows have enough nutrients without undesired metabolic problems or weight increases. Customized dry period durations can significantly improve the health and milk yield of high-yielding dairy cows, especially those with severe negative energy balance.

Maximizing Dairy Cow Health and Productivity: Essential Strategies for the Transition Period

Maximize dairy cow health during the critical transition period. Discover essential strategies for nutrition, metabolic disorders, and farm management. Ready to optimize?

Dairy cows’ transition period—the final three weeks of gestation through the first three weeks of lactation—is critical. Herd production and health may be significantly affected at this crucial juncture by Cow metabolic problems, and other health concerns are susceptible during this period; hence, ideal management techniques are pretty important. Emphasizing nutrition, metabolic diseases, and agricultural management techniques, this paper investigates ways to improve the transition phase. Good management throughout these weeks, with the crucial involvement of veterinarians and nutritionists, will help lower postpartum infections, guarantee seamless breastfeeding transitions, and increase milk supply.

The Crucial Transition Period: From Dry Cow to Peak Lactation 

The transition phase of dairy cows, which extends from three weeks before to three weeks after calving, involves significant changes that can impact cow health and output. Therefore, good management is crucial for a seamless transition from the dry cow phase to peak lactation. With the proper management practices, dairy farmers, veterinarians, and nutritionists can feel reassured and confident in their ability to navigate this critical period.

The approximately 60-day dry season is split into the far-off and close-up stages. Cows in the far-off phase usually maintain physical conditions on low-energy, high-fiber diets. Food changes during the close-up period as calving approaches to prepare the rumen for lactation and avoid metabolic problems like ketosis and fatty liver disease. At this point, proper diet is vital.

Calving is a taxing event requiring much energy and effort for milk production. Hormonal changes, including an increase in estrogen and a fall in progesterone, facilitate birth and lactation. To protect the health of the Cow and calf, postpartum inflammation and stress must be closely watched and sometimes treated medically.

Early Lactation: Cows’ high energy needs when milk production begins after calving usually result in a negative energy balance. The liver uses much fat for energy, which, if not appropriately controlled, could lead to ketosis. Calcium needs for milk production rise, thus increasing the risk of hypocalcemia. Health and output depend on management techniques, including optimizing dry matter intake and rumen function.

Throughout these phases, dairy cows alter physiologically, which affects their general condition. Food, surroundings, and health monitoring help reduce adverse effects, encouraging a smooth transition and strong breastfeeding performance.

Advanced techniques like reducing pen movements and guaranteeing enough space per Cow, implementing early disease detection and treatment protocols, and ensuring a balanced diet with the right supplements improve well-being even more during this changeover time. Early addressing of the leading infectious illnesses also helps avoid subsequent metabolic problems, emphasizing the need for thorough cow health care during the transition.

Overcoming Transition Period Challenges: From Metabolic Disorders to Effective Management 

Dairy cows have a difficult transition time full of many factors that may significantly affect their health and output. Metabolic problems are among the most often occurring ones at this time. Common conditions include ketosis and fatty liver. When cows burn down too much body fat to satisfy their energy needs, ketosis results, and ketone bodies build up in the circulation. Excessive fat mobilization and triglyceride buildup in the liver cause fatty liver, impairing its regular operation.

Problems in the transition phase are typically related to nutritional imbalances. In over-conditioned cows, a typical problem is insufficient dry matter intake (DMI). One customer mentioned, for instance, that there was no milk output from high-parity cows because of inferior feed supplied during dry time. This resulted in low post-calving production and metabolic stress.

Significant management difficulties also exist. Transition success in the herd depends on its physical surroundings, dietary patterns, and social dynamics, including dominance hierarchy and social stress. For instance, a recent Mexico consultation revealed how a scarcity of crucial feed ingredients brought on by border restrictions resulted in a significant shift in cow diets, upsetting rumen function and changing milk components.

Milking frequency and the introduction of concentrates after calving are crucial. An uneven diet might arise in several European systems using automatic concentrate feeders, particularly for over-conditioned cows, and reducing the milking frequency during the first week after calving will assist in restoring their energy balance and controlling metabolic problems.

Important issues include pen motions and societal hierarchy. Giving more room and strategic feeding times, minimizing pen movements, and lowering dominating behavior will help to improve feed intake and health results. Since cattle eat as a herd, their allometric character makes it imperative to maximize these inclinations to guarantee consistent feed intake and lower stress.

Addressing metabolic diseases, guaranteeing appropriate nutrition, and controlling social and environmental elements are crucial to reducing the difficulties during the transition phase. Practical examples from several worldwide environments underscore the complexity and need for thorough management measures to maintain dairy cow health and production.

Strategic Nutritional Management to Optimize Health and Productivity in Transitioning Dairy Cows 

Cow health and production depend on an appropriate diet throughout the changeover phase. The metabolic and physiological changes from dry to peak lactation require a balanced diet.

Premium forages, such as grass hay and alfalfa, are essential. These provide the required fiber to keep the rumen working and avoid problems such as displaced abomasum. In 1999, Drackley emphasized the need for fodder quality in maintaining dry matter intake (DMI).

Additionally, balanced meals that satisfy the Cow’s demands for calories, protein, and vitamins without excesses that lead to metabolic disorders are essential. Including the correct combination of proteins and carbs helps control energy balance, lower ketosis risks, and promote lactation. Research by Cook and Nordlund ( 2004) underlines the requirement of exact ration formulation in this era.

Supplements improve metabolic conditions. Essential minerals and vitamins, including calcium, magnesium, and phosphorous, help avoid hypocalcemia. Huzzey et al. (2006) claim that monensin may help lower subclinical ketosis and increase feed efficiency.

Gradual diet changes are essential. Moving gradually from high fodder to high concentrate levels lets cows adjust without metabolic stress. Strategic feeding and monitoring help avoid diseases and provide a consistent intake, which is essential for recovery after calving.

Including balanced diets, premium forages, and focused supplements creates a solid nutritional plan. During the transition phase, these methods improve cow health, lower metabolic problems, and increase output.

Mitigating Metabolic Disorders: The Cornerstone of Transition Cow Health

For dairy cows, metabolic problems during the transition phase represent major issues influencing production and general health. Three central diseases to be on alert are fatty liver syndrome, hypocalcemia, and ketosis.

When cows have a negative energy balance, ketosis results; this occurs postpartum. Low dry matter intake drives the Cow to convert fat stores into ketones. Among the signs include fatigue, a diminished appetite, and a lower milk supply. Untreated ketosis might cause severe disorders such as displaced abomasum or metritis. Bach et al. (2008) emphasize early identification and action as vital to minimize these effects.

They are known as milk fever. Hypocalcemia—low blood calcium levels around calving—results from the abrupt start of lactation. Muscle weakness, shakes, and—in extreme cases—recumbency are among the symptoms. It may compromise the immune system, increasing the likelihood of conditions such as mastitis and retained placenta. Nordlund et al. (2011) support dietary anions and calcium supplements to avoid this condition as part of nutritional plans.

Closely linked to ketosis, fatty liver syndrome results from too much fat mobilization overwhelming the liver and resulting in fat buildup. The symptoms include poor physical condition, decreased milk output, and less feed consumption. According to Drackley (1999), good management techniques help to avoid this condition by regulating energy intake throughout the dry season.

Recent studies like Caixeta et al. (2018) show the interdependence of these diseases by pointing out relationships between subclinical hypocalcemia, ketosis, and fatty liver syndrome. This implies that efficient management of transition cows depends on comprehensive strategies aimed at general metabolic health.

Managing metabolic problems during transition requires a multimodal strategy, including constant monitoring, exact dietary plans, and quick veterinarian intervention. Knowing their origins, symptoms, and effects can help dairy producers greatly enhance cow health and output.

Effective Farm Management Practices: The Pillars of Transition Period Success 

Dairy cow changeover times provide particular difficulties that need good farm management techniques. Maximizing living conditions, lowering stress, and applying cutting-edge monitoring technologies to preserve cow health and output are part of a strategic strategy.

Cow health depends critically on housing. Giving enough room per Cow in transition pens—ideally, 30 inches of bed space—helps prevent subordinate cows’ displacement. Additionally, it helps to lower infections, including mastitis (Cook & Nordlund, 2004), and it is clean, dry, and comfy bedding.

Reducing stress is equally crucial. Dairy cows flourish in surroundings that allow for social activity. Minimizing pen movements during the transition time improves feed intake and lowers stress. Along with modest anti-inflammatory therapies, monitoring calving and offering appropriate support can help control stress and inflammation post-calving (Huzzey et al., 2006).

Advanced monitoring systems are crucial for the early discovery and treatment of metabolic diseases. Technologies such as activity trackers and rumination monitors detect subtle behavioral changes that indicate problems such as ketosis or hypocalcemia. Early intervention based on data-driven insights may dramatically improve results (Caixeta et al., 2018).

Including these techniques in everyday procedures offers a complete strategy to help dairy cows during the crucial transition phase. Farmers may design a setting that guarantees a seamless transition from dry Cow to peak lactation by emphasizing housing, stress management, and sophisticated monitoring.

Innovative Approaches to Managing the Transition Period in Dairy Cows 

Controlling the transition phase in dairy cows calls for traditional and creative solutions to improve output and health. Modern technology, precision farming, and holistic health approaches have changed this critical stage.

Wearable health monitors tracking real-time vital indicators like body temperature and activity levels are among the most exciting developments. These devices make early diagnosis of problems like ketosis or hypocalcemia possible, permitting prompt responses (Caixeta et al., 2018). Together with automated feeding systems, they provide tailored nutrition, maximizing dry matter consumption and general health.

Using GPS and automated tools, precision farming methods guarantee correct feed and supplement delivery—qualities vital throughout the changeover time. This approach also covers barns’ environmental management, lowering stress, and raising cow wellbeing.

Holistic health management combines veterinary treatment with alternative therapies like herbal medicine and acupuncture to strengthen immunity and lower inflammation. Mild anti-inflammatory medications and appropriate calving monitoring can help significantly reduce stress after calving (Huzzey et al., 2006).

Data analytics and machine learning provide preemptive interventions by predicting possible health problems. Knowing the function of the microbiota helps create diets that avoid dysbiosis and related health issues.

Herd social dynamics are another aspect of holistic farm management. Reducing pen movements and guaranteeing enough space for each Cow at feeding stations helps to lower social stress and promote more feed intake (Nordlund et al., 2011).

Using these creative ideas helps dairy cow health and production throughout the transition time, promoting sustainability and profitability of dairy farming. Farmers may use technology developments and holistic approaches to help their herds flourish during this demanding era.

The Bottom Line

Control of the dairy cow transition time is vital. This period demands a sensible diet, knowledge of metabolic problems, and good management strategies. Prioritizing dry matter intake, customizing feed formulas, and using efficient farm management to reduce stress can assure success. Strategic nutritional planning is highlighted by research on food, consumption, and illness risk that stresses Bach et al. (2008) and Caixeta et al. (2018). As Nordlund et al. (2011, 2006) demonstrate, practices such as minimizing pen movements and giving enough feeding area improve cow welfare and the feed economy. Working together with dairy producers, vets, and nutritionists is vital. Using the most recent knowledge will help us to improve transition plans and guarantee a sustainable, profitable future for the dairy sector. 

Key Takeaways:

  • Importance of Dry Matter Intake: Prioritize maximizing dry matter intake to support rumen adaptation and overall cow health.
  • Calcium Homeostasis: Proper calcium levels are maintained to prevent disorders like milk fever and support metabolic functions.
  • Metabolic Monitoring: Regularly monitor and manage metabolic parameters such as ketosis and hypocalcemia for early intervention.
  • Nutritional Strategies: Implement balanced diets that cater to the specific needs of transitioning cows, avoiding overfeeding of concentrates.
  • Inflammation Control: Address issues of inflammation and dysbiosis through careful feed management and monitoring.
  • Tailored Management Practices: Adopt individualized or cohort-specific care plans to address unique needs and improve outcomes.
  • Continuous Learning: Stay informed about the latest research and innovations in transition cow management to refine strategies continually.

Summary: 

The transition period of dairy cows from three weeks before to three weeks after calving is crucial for herd production and health. This period is characterized by significant changes that can impact cow health and output. Good management techniques are essential for a smooth transition from the dry cow phase to peak lactation. The approximately 60-day dry season is divided into far-off and close-up stages, with cows in the far-off phase maintaining physical conditions on low-energy, high-fiber diets. Calving is a taxing event requiring energy and effort for milk production, with hormonal changes facilitating birth and lactation. Postpartum inflammation and stress must be closely monitored and treated medically. Health and output depend on management techniques, including optimizing dry matter intake and rumen function. Advanced techniques like reducing pen movements, ensuring enough space per cow, implementing early disease detection and treatment protocols, and ensuring a balanced diet with the right supplements improve well-being during this changeover time.

Learn more:

Unlocking the Secrets of Dry Matter Intake in US Holstein Cows: The Genomic and Phenotypic Influence on Milk Components and Body Weight

Uncover the potential of genomic and phenotypic insights to enhance dry matter intake management in US Holstein cows, ultimately boosting milk production and body weight management. Intrigued by the possibilities?

In the context of dairy farming, ‘dry matter intake’ (DMI) is not just a term for veterinarians and nutritionists. It’s a crucial factor for US Holstein cows, the key players in milk production. The efficiency of these cows is directly linked to what they eat, how much they eat, and how effectively they convert that intake into milk and robust health. Therefore, understanding DMI is not just important for maximizing farm potential, but it’s also the key to connecting feed efficiency, milk production, and overall animal welfare

“Optimizing dry matter intake is crucial for enhancing milk yield and ensuring cow health. It’s the linchpin of dairy farm efficiency.” 

This article explores the genomic and phenotypic impacts of DMI, highlighting its role in milk production and body weight management. Using data from 8,513 lactations of 6,621 Holstein cows, we’ll examine: 

  • The link between DMI and milk components like fat and protein.
  • How body size traits affect DMI.
  • The impact on breeding programs aiming for better feed efficiency and productivity.

Join us as we dive into these dynamics and discover strategies to boost profitability and sustainability in dairy farming.

Unveiling the Genomic and Phenotypic Dynamics of Dry Matter Intake in Holstein Cows 

Understanding dry matter intake (DMI) in Holstein cows is crucial for nutrition management and breeding programs. Large data sets have revolutionized this research, allowing precise estimation of feed requirements for milk production and body maintenance. These datasets provide a strong foundation for refining predictive models. 

Two main approaches are used to evaluate DMI: phenotypic and genetic regressions. Phenotypic regressions use visible traits and help dairy farmers adjust feeding strategies based on real-time data for milk yield, fat, and protein content. This is vital for optimizing feed efficiency and maintaining herd health. 

Genetic regressions, on the other hand, examine the genetic factors influencing DMI. These are especially useful in breeding programs that aim to enhance important traits through selective breeding. Genetic evaluations guide breeding decisions that promote traits like higher milk yield, better milk quality, and improved feed efficiency. 

The difference between phenotypic and genetic regressions highlights the distinct goals of nutrition management and genetic improvement. Phenotypic data meets immediate needs, while genetic data fosters long-term improvements. Combining both approaches enhances current and future herd performance. 

These advancements in genomic tools and statistical models, such as BostaurusUMD3.1.1 for genomic evaluations, underscore the collaborative effort to advance DMI research. This collective endeavor aims to optimize productivity and sustainability in dairy farming, a goal we all share in the scientific community.

An Unprecedented Dive into Dry Matter Intake Through Genomic and Phenotypic Lenses 

This study makes a unique contribution to the field of dairy farming and genetics by analyzing DMI using a large dataset from 8,513 lactations across 6,621 Holstein cows. By integrating phenotypic and genomic views, we were able to provide a detailed look at DMI through sophisticated mixed models. These models included variables like days in milk, age parity, trial dates, management groups, and body weight changes during 28—and 42-day feeding trials in mid-lactation, ensuring accuracy in the results. 

Based on observable traits, phenotypic regressions gave practical insights for nutritional management. In contrast, genomic regressions, grounded in genetic data, offered deeper insights crucial for breeding programs. Both evaluation types provided a comprehensive understanding of feed efficiency and milk production potential, aiding in better selection and breeding strategies.

Balancing Nutritional Demands: Insights from Phenotypic and Genomic Regressions 

The phenotypic regressions of Dry Matter Intake (DMI) on milk, fat, and protein revealed specific coefficients that underscore the intricate balance required in nutrition management. For milk, the coefficient was modest (0.014 ± 0.006), indicating a relatively low increase in DMI per unit increase in milk production. Conversely, fat (3.06 ± 0.01) and protein (4.79 ± 0.25) showed more substantial coefficients, demonstrating that increases in these components significantly elevate the DMI requirements. These results suggest that nutritional plans must be meticulously tailored, focusing more on the feed requirements for fat and protein production to ensure optimal energy balance and animal health

When we compare these findings to the corresponding genomic regressions, we observe stark contrasts. Genomic regressions yielded higher coefficients across all components: milk (0.08 ± 0.03), fat (11.30 ± 0.47), and protein (9.35 ± 0.87). This difference implies that genetic potential is more dominant in determining feed efficiency than phenotypic observations alone. Simply put, cows with higher genetic predispositions for milk components require substantially more feed, reflecting their superior production capabilities. 

These discrepancies highlight an essential consideration for breeding programs. While phenotypic data provide valuable insights into immediate nutritional needs, genomic data offer a more comprehensive forecast for long-term feed efficiency and production potential. Consequently, integrating these genomic insights into breeding strategies can drive advancements in producing more feed-efficient cows, aligning with evolving economic and environmental objectives.

The ECM Formula: Unveiling the Energy Dynamics in Dairy Production 

The ECM formula is vital for measuring milk’s energy content by considering its fat, protein, and lactose components. This standardization allows for fair comparisons across various milk types. Our study uses the ECM formula to reveal the energy needs of different milk components, shedding light on the nutritional and economic facets of dairy farming. 

Regarding DMI for fat and protein, phenotypic and genomic regressions show significant differences. Phenotypic regressions suggest protein production needs 56% more DMI than fat. Genomic regressions show a smaller gap, with protein needing 21% more DMI than fat. Sire genomic regressions add complexity, indicating fat requires 35% more DMI than protein. These differences highlight the challenge of converting genetic data into practical feed efficiency. 

These findings have profound implications for feed cost management. Increased DMI for any milk component escalates feed expenses, a critical consideration for farmers aiming to enhance profitability. However, breeders can leverage genomic data to select cows with lower residual feed intake that still yield ample milk, fat, and protein. This strategic approach enhances the economic viability of dairy operations, fostering more efficient and sustainable feeding practicesthat benefit both producers and consumers.

Sustaining Holstein Vigor: The Role of Body Weight and Maintenance 

Examining annual maintenance needs in Holstein cows through phenotypic, genomic, and sire genomic regressions unveils notable consistency. Estimates, expressed in kilograms of dry matter intake (DMI) per kilogram of body weight per lactation, show phenotypic regression at 5.9 ± 0.14, genomic regression at 5.8 ± 0.31, and sire genomic regression, adjusted by two, at 5.3 ± 0.55. These are higher than those from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) using Net Energy for Lactation (NEL) equations. 

Discrepancies arise because NASEM’s general equations overlook individual genetic and environmental nuances. Genomic data offer a more dynamic and specific view, capturing intricate biological interactions. Modern genomic evaluations, encompassing various genetic traits, provide a clearer picture of maintenance needs, suggesting earlier models may underestimate the metabolic demands of high-yield dairy cows

This analysis highlights the need to blend genomic insights with phenotypic data to grasp maintenance requirements reliably. By refining models with the latest genetic data, the dairy industry can enhance nutrition plans, improving animal welfare and productivity.

Decoding Dairy Efficiency: The Interplay of Type Traits and Body Weight Composite

Exploring multiple regressions on genomic evaluations for the body weight composite (BWC) traits, we find that strength stands out. It’s the best predictor of body weight and Dry Matter Intake (DMI), confirming its crucial role in the current BWC formula. 

Other traits seem less significant in predicting DMI. This suggests that breeding programs enhance strength to improve body weight and feed efficiency. Prioritizing strength can balance robust body weight with better feed utilization. 

Breeders can build more productive and cost-effective Holstein herds by selecting for strength. This aligns to improve profitability through more brilliant breeding and makes a strong case for ongoing genomic research in dairy production.

Optimizing Genetic Gains: The Evolution of the Net Merit Formula 

The 2021 revision of the Net Merit formula marked a pivotal shift towards improving the economic efficiency of breeding programs. Integrating recent findings on dry matter intake (DMI) and other traits, the formula better aligns with the complex relationships among milk production components, body size, and feed efficiency. 

The updated formula prioritizes more miniature cows with traits like harmful residual feed intake and higher milk, fat, and protein yields. This strategic approach promotes cows that produce more milk and enhance feed efficiency, reducing operational costs and boosting profitability. By incorporating genomic and phenotypic data, the Net Merit formula advances precision breeding, considering the economic impact of each trait and supporting a sustainable dairy industry. 

This revision synchronizes breeding goals with economic benefits, encouraging the development of cows that excel in productivity while minimizing feed costs. It highlights the vital link between genetic research and practical breeding strategies, solidifying the Net Merit formula’s essential role in modern dairy farming.

The Bottom Line

The exploration of dry matter intake (DMI) in US Holstein cows through both genomic and phenotypic lenses has unveiled crucial insights into the nutritional and economic dynamics of dairy farming. The study revealed that genomic regressions provide a more accurate estimate of feed required for individual milk components or body maintenance than phenotypic regressions. Furthermore, the energy-corrected milk (ECM) formula highlighted that fat production demands significantly higher DMI than protein production, establishing a clear difference in nutrient requirements based on milk composition. 

One of the pivotal findings emphasizes the significant benefits of selecting more miniature cows with harmful residual feed intake (RFI). These cows require less feed and exhibit an enhanced production of milk, fat, and protein, thereby improving overall farm profitability. This aligns with the revised Net Merit formula, which aims to optimize genetic traits for economic efficiency. 

The implications for breeding programs are profound. Adopting strategies that prioritize genomic evaluations can lead to more efficient feed utilization and better economic outcomes. This study suggests that future research should delve deeper into the genetic mechanisms underlying RFI and explore the long-term impacts on herd health and productivity. Additionally, there’s potential for these findings to inform genetic selection criteria in dairy breeding programs globally, enhancing the sustainability and profitability of the dairy industry.

Key Takeaways:

  • Large datasets allow precise estimation of feed required for individual milk components and body maintenance.
  • Genetic regressions are more impactful for breeding programs than phenotypic regressions, which are more useful for nutrition management.
  • Fat production requires significantly more DMI than protein production when analyzed through the energy-corrected milk (ECM) formula.
  • Phenotypic regressions underestimate the DMI compared to genetic regressions.
  • Annual maintenance DMI for body weight is slightly underestimated in phenotypic regressions compared to genomic estimations.
  • Strength is the type trait most strongly associated with body weight and DMI, as highlighted by the revised body weight composite (BWC) formula.
  • To enhance profitability, breeding programs should focus on selecting smaller cows with negative residual feed intake that are high producers of milk, fat, and protein.
  • The Net Merit formula has been updated to reflect these insights, aiming for an economically optimal genetic selection response.

Summary: A study analyzing dry matter intake (DMI) in US Holstein cows found that understanding DMI is crucial for maximizing farm potential and connecting feed efficiency, milk production, and animal welfare. The study used data from 8,513 lactations of 6,621 Holstein cows and genetic regressions to analyze DMI. Phenotypic regressions used visible traits to adjust feeding strategies based on real-time data for milk yield, fat, and protein content. Genetic regressions examined genetic factors influencing DMI, useful in selective breeding programs. Results suggest that nutritional plans must be meticulously tailored, focusing on feed requirements for fat and protein production to ensure optimal energy balance and animal health. Genomic insights can drive advancements in producing feed-efficient cows, aligning with economic and environmental objectives. The Energy-Correlated Milk (ECM) formula is a crucial tool for measuring milk’s energy content, revealing significant differences in DMI for fat and protein.

Strategies for Dairy Farmers: Managing Feed Variation to Minimize Economic Stress

Find out how to handle feed variation and reduce stress on your dairy farm. See how you can cut losses and increase profits with better feed management.

Are you a dairy farmer trying to increase profitability without sacrificing your cows’ health or stress-free condition? Your daily operations depend on feed management, which frequently makes up 45% of your expenses. A well-controlled feed saves money and reduces stress for your staff and herd. Adjusting feed methods may mitigate financial losses and improve cattle health.

Read more for advice on reducing feed variability and stress. From bunkers to total mixed rations (TMR), these pointers will assist in simplifying processes and improving output. All set for some practical, financially wise guidance? Let’s go right in.

Overcoming Feed Variations: Ensuring Herd Health and Economic Stability 

Your herd’s health and the financial stability of your dairy farm may be much influenced by control of feed changes. At the bunker silo, silage packing and sealing are very vital. Here, poor methods cause oxygen intrusion and feed spoiling, compromising nutrients and generating financial waste.

Inconsistent mixing periods and imbalanced ingredient loading at the feed mixer might produce a TMR lacking consistency. This encourages cows to sort the feed, therefore upsetting their balanced diet and raising their chance of stomach problems.

Uneven particle sizes in feed may impede digestion in the cow’s stomach. Too tiny particles increase the danger of acidosis, while coarse particles lower the microbial digesting efficiency. Both badly affect herd health and milk output.

Economically, feed spoilage and digestive problems may cause wasted feed investments, decreased milk output, more veterinary bills, and less profitability. Strict feed management techniques assist in guaranteeing that your feed investment optimizes herd health and production.

Mastering Bunker Management: The Cornerstone of Dairy Farm Success 

The success of a dairy farm depends on good bunker management, which affects feed quality and the economy. Concentrate silage face management, feed-out rates, sealing quality, and packing density to save feed and lower spoilage.

When cutting silage, silage face management involves maintaining a smooth, vertical face. This reduces rotting and air exposure. Sharp cutting tools can also protect the silage integrity and prevent jagged edges.

Remove around thirty centimeters of silage daily for feed-out rates to minimize aerobic deterioration. Timing and amount are critical to maintaining a fresh, constant-quality feed for your herd.

Sealing Quality is really crucial. Seal the bunker silo with premium plastic and oxygen-limiting barrier films; fasten them with tires or sandbags. This maintains an anaerobic condition, therefore conserving feed nutrients and avoiding spoiling.

Over 700 kg of dry stuff per cubic meter is a necessary packing density. Layer and crush silage completely with heavy equipment to remove oxygen pockets and preserve silage quality.

Using these techniques improves dairy profitability and helps reduce feed waste. Proper bunker management is critical to the financial viability of your farm.

Optimizing Silo Dimensions: A Key to Safe and Efficient Feed Management

Silo dimensions are crucial for safety, cost, and feed management. Ensure the maximum height is accessible by defacing equipment and the minimum width matches two packing trailers. 

Remove 30 centimeters of silage daily to limit oxygen infiltration and minimize spoilage. Pack and seal the pile carefully, using plastic and oxygen-limiting barrier films secured with tires or sandbags.

Adhering to these guidelines maintains a reasonable feedout rate, enhances safety, and boosts dairy farm profitability.

Effective Silo Packing and Covering: Your Key to Reducing Spoilage and Boosting Silage Quality 

Packing and covering your silo correctly is critical to keeping oxygen out and preserving silage quality. Spread the silage evenly during filling to ensure uniform density. Use heavy machinery for tight packing to minimize air pockets. 

Cover the silo immediately with high-quality plastic and oxygen-limiting films to create an airtight seal. Lay the plastic carefully, avoiding gaps or tears. 

Secure the cover with tires or sandbags placed closely side by side. This helps maintain the seal and adds pressure. Focusing on these steps can reduce dry matter loss and preserve nutritional value, boosting profitability.

The Art of Feedout: Safeguarding Your Silage and Your Bottom Line

Removing silage from the bunker is a vital part of feedout practices. Proper removal prevents spoilage and ensures quality feed for your cows. Aim to remove about 30 centimeters of silage daily to keep it fresh and maintain the silage face. Please ensure no leftovers are at the bottom, as they can spoil and lead to economic losses.

Total Mixed Ration (TMR): The Backbone of Effective Feed Management 

The Total Mixed Ration (TMR) is vital for effective feed management in dairy farming. It ensures each cow gets a balanced diet, providing a mix of forages, grains, proteins, vitamins, and minerals crucial for cow health and milk production. 

Fiber and forage in TMR are essential for chewing and saliva production, which help maintain ruminal pH and a healthy rumen. Proper pH levels prevent digestive issues like acidosis, which can harm cow health and milk yield. 

However, TMR benefits can be recovered if forage particles are shorter. Otherwise, cows will sort the feed and miss essential nutrients. Conversely, particles that are too short may not provide enough fiber. 

Accurate measurement and mixing of feed ingredients are crucial. Tools like Feed Supervisor can track TMR composition and allow real-time adjustments. By doing so, dairy farms can enhance herd nutrition and farm profitability.

Optimizing Forage Particle Size: A Catalyst for Higher DMI and Enhanced Milk Production

The physical characteristics of the ration are crucial for increasing dry matter intake (DMI) and meeting your cow’s energetic needs for milk production. When forage particles are sized correctly, cows can consume more feed efficiently. However, if particles are too long, they can cause rumen distention and potential health issues. 

Proper particle length helps maintain rumen health by preventing selective eating, where cows leave behind coarser feed. This can lead to an unbalanced diet and digestive disorders like acidosis. Addressing this ensures balanced intake, promotes cow health, and optimizes milk production.

The Meticulous Preparation of Total Mixed Ration (TMR): How to Optimize Productivity and Profitability 

The meticulous preparation of Total Mixed Ration (TMR) directly impacts your farm’s productivity and profitability. Here’s how to ace it: 

  • Ingredient Order: Load long forages first, then smaller forages, grains, and supplements. This ensures even mixing.
  • Scale Accuracy: Calibrate your scales regularly. Accurate weighing guarantees a balanced diet for every cow.
  • Mixing: Use moderate speed and recommended times. This ensures a uniform mix.
  • Ration Distribution: Distribute TMR evenly in the feed bunk to avoid nutrient imbalances.
  • Feeding Frequency: Feed and push up frequently to keep TMR fresh, boosting intake and preventing selective eating.

Following these TMR prep steps enhances feed investment returns. Balanced nutrition boosts rumen health, dry matter intake, and milk production, leading to higher profits.

The Bottom Line

Effective feed management is critical to your dairy farm’s success. By addressing feed variations—from silage prep and silo dimensions to TMR consistency—you can reduce waste and boost milk production. Proper bunker management and meticulous silo packing maintain silage quality while optimizing forage particle size in the TMR ensures a balanced diet and reduces digestive issues. 

Comprehensive feed management improves herd health and dry matter intake (DMI), driving milk production efficiency. Reporting tools help make informed decisions, reducing feed costs and boosting profitability. Consistent feeding practices enhance livestock health and productivity, proving that well-managed feed solutions are crucial for your dairy farm’s economic stability.

Key Takeaways:

  • Effective feed management is critical to reducing economic losses in dairy farming.
  • Proper bunker management techniques can minimize feed spoilage and maximize profits.
  • Well-optimized silo dimensions are essential for safety and efficient feed management.
  • Packing and covering silage properly can significantly reduce the risk of oxygen infiltration and spoilage.
  • The total mixed ration (TMR) must be balanced to avoid digestive disorders and improve cow health.
  • Ensuring the correct forage particle size can enhance dry matter intake (DMI) and milk production.
  • Precise TMR preparation, including correct ingredient loading and mixing instructions, can boost farm productivity and profitability.

Summary: Dairy farmers must prioritize feed management to increase profitability without compromising cow health. Feed management accounts for 45% of daily expenses and can save money, reduce stress, and improve cattle health. Poor bunker management methods can lead to oxygen intrusion, feed spoiling, nutrient compromise, and financial waste. Inconsistent mixing periods and imbalanced ingredient loading can cause a TMR lacking consistency, leading to cows sorting the feed and increasing the risk of stomach problems. Uneven particle sizes in feed can also hinder digestion, affecting herd health and milk output. Mastering bunker management is crucial for dairy farm success, as it affects feed quality and the economy. Focusing on silage face management, feed-out rates, sealing quality, and packing density can save feed and lower spoilage. Optimizing silo dimensions is essential for safety, cost, and feed management. Feedout practices are essential for dairy farming, ensuring quality feed and preventing spoilage. Accurate measurement and mixing of feed ingredients are crucial, and optimizing forage particle size is essential for higher dry matter intake and enhanced milk production. Preparing TMR directly impacts farm productivity and profitability, boosting rumen health, dry matter intake, and milk production, leading to higher profits.

Management Intensive Grazing … Thinking Outside the Barn

One minute we are waiting for a long winter to make its way into the history books and the next we are noticing how it’s almost too warm to work outdoors comfortably. No doubt our working dairy herd is also feeling the effects of changes in the weather.  Too cold or too hot we must always be anticipating ways to recover any dollars that because of climate conditions have resulted in more expenses or less production.  Having said that, why then are we “surprised” by a change in the weather?

Perhaps it`s time to think beyond current the season and decide how best to tweak the three or five year plan. Factors such as costs, labor and profit margins might be telling you it`s time for a major change.  Before this year`s crops are all seeded, it might be a good time to make a dramatic change in your feed delivery system. Is it time to think outside the box stall or feed pen. Have you considered management intensive grazing (MiG)? This involves repeating periods of grazing and rest among two or more paddocks or pastures.
 

Every Line on Your Financial Statement Must Be Re-considered

When it comes to choosing to use a rotational pasture program, those who have mastered pasture suggest many questions that should be answered when considering grazing over confinement feeding of the dairy herd:

  • How much feed do you currently grow?  How much less will you need if cows are pastured?
  • What is the current value of feeding equipment – both growing and delivery —? Can you recoup dollars from selling?  What annual maintenance and repair fees will be eliminated?
  • How long will your current equipment, which won’t be as heavily used, contribute to your 3-5-10 year plan?
  • What current costs are applied to manure haulage?  What savings can be realized if cows are on pasture?
  • Fuel inputs could be dramatically lowered, with less planting, harvesting and feeding.
  • What are your current herd health costs?  If exercise and fresh air reduce vet, medication and staff health care inputs, what could that add to your bottom line?

Once you have an itemized list of potential savings, you have the opportunity to decide how that can be applied to your specific long-term dairy strategy.

Who is Thinking MIG these days?  What is Pushing and Pulling them to Pasture

  1. Farmers who are starting out or closing out.  If the farm supports sizable pastures, intensive grazing could be a good start-up dairy feeding plan for a farmer just starting in to dairying.  At the other end of the spectrum, it could have the same attraction as a way of downsizing from a long-term established dairy.
  2. Farmers who anticipate that high quality pasture forage can be provided for half the cost of stored forages.
  3. Pasture feeding is a requirement for organic dairy farmers.
  4. Purely from the financial side, grazing can make more money with less debt load.

Should YOU be Thinking MIG?

We often use the expression that a project or a purchase “ticks all the boxes”.  Before changing from confinement dairy housing to management intensive grazing, see if your situation gets a “yes” checkmark for each of these questions:

  • Does your farm lend itself to producing pasture as well as or, more than, cropping?
  • Can you accept a lower herd average than average for the top half of confinement herds?
  • Are you willing to adjust dairy ration based on current pasture conditions?
  • Ready for a change in chores?
  • Is there adequate pasture to meet most of the daily forage needs for livestock for the grazing season?
  • Can milk cows get to and from the milking parlor as needed from the pasture?
  • Will you provide fresh water to ALL the paddocks?

And the most important question

  • Are you willing to change?

Oops! Make Sure You`re Not Harboring Misconceptions About Intensive Grazing

If you`re looking at grazing as a simple proposition of turning the cows out of the barn and onto fenced in fields as a huge savings in labor you may be misinformed.  Depending on the quantity and quality of the pasture and the size of your herd, you may actually be looking at the “intensive” part of Management Intensive Grazing could be the number of moves that must be made from pasture to pasture. Depending on the season there could be several every day. There is a definite skill in managing grazing so that it improves the soil, the legumes and herd health and that definitely does not mean out to pasture – out of sight – out of mind. As with any other dairy management problem, once you have named it (too many pasture changes) you are one step closer to the solution.  For some pasture managers they use a gate that opens electronically, thus reducing the number of times they have to work with fences.

From the Cows’ Perspectives do you have the BITE Stuff

When looking at pasture you may be taking in the size of the pasture when assessing how it will meet your herd’s nutrition requirements.  It is important that you are providing enough Dry Matter Intake (DMI). In a day on pasture cows take in approximately 22 to 28 pounds of dry matter. The best way to make sure cows are eating enough DMI from pasture is to pay close attention to the size of the bite of pasture they receive. Pasture height and density determines this bite size. If the pasture is too short, then they cannot get enough pasture in each bite to meet their DMI needs, even if given a larger area to graze.  Sometimes the obvious eludes our attention.  In the case of pasture grazing, we must accept that cows only take a certain number of bites each day and only graze for part of each day because they must also spend time resting and ruminating. Once you have determined that you have the required amount and quality of pasture, the challenge becomes how to get your cows to eat enough of it in eight hours to supply their production needs.  This is one reason to provide a new pasture, which is tall and dense, after each milking. When cows go into a pasture that is tall enough, they can rapidly fill their rumens with high quality high protein feed.

Mistakes and Pitfalls of Managed Pastures

In researching the benefits of using management intensive grazing, one can easily be won over to the benefits and overlook the potential downsides of this system.  As with any thing “managed” they are ways to do it well and there are ways to fail.  The latter can include the following.

  • Poor plant growth due to overgrazing damage.
  • Poor animal performance (including poor reproductive performance) and
  • reduced milk production
  • inadequate dry matter intake (DMI) from pasture or
  • incorrect supplemental feeding.
  • Animal health problems, particularly parasite problems.

And finally one with a term you might not be familiar with … yet.

  • “Untoward acceleration” is a term used by Andre Voisin in his book, Grass Productivity, to describe what happens when paddocks are not rested long enough between grazings. Each grazing of the paddock provides less forage and the regrowth period gets shorter throughout the grazing season until most of the plants are overgrazed and there is little or no feed left.

THE BIG THREE:

#1 Health Benefits

Health Benefits of Grazing Dairy Heifers Cornell data showed early lactation health problems were reduced in first calf heifers which were rotationally grazed for 5 months prior to their freshening date, compared to a duplicate group which was raised in confinement prior to freshening.  These results were consistent with previous research completed by the University of Minnesota from 2000 through 2002, which also compared raising pregnant dairy replacements in confinement vs. rotationally grazed. Their results showed that the animals raised in intensively grazed pastures had fewer post-partum problems than their counterparts

#2 Weight And Production Gains.

Weight and milk production gains with heifers raised on pasture compared to confinement have also been realized. In a study by Posner and Hedtke, 2012, (CIAS Research Brief #89), yearling heifers gained 1.97 and 1.86 pounds per day on pasture and in confinement, respectively. For ME Milk production, the first lactation heifers produced 25,328 and 23,415, pounds of milk respectively for those raised on pasture versus those raised in confinement. Thus, from reducing costs, increasing health and milk production, raising heifers on pasture makes sense.

#3 The Grass Is Greener and So is the Profit!

Studies prove rotational grazing of dairy heifers reduces the cost of raising heifers. This is where you really have to do your homework.  Get your hands on the best information, talk with recognized experts, and make sure all your decisions are well-informed.  Here are three links to help with your research: Dairy Farmer Profitability Using Intensive Rotational Stocking, Profitable Grazing based dairy Systems, and A Profitability Analysis of Dairy Feeding Systems in the Northeast.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Changing to Management Intensive Grazing is not rocket science. As long as your motivation is to do it well and not merely to dump current work that you don`t like doing, you will be fine.  Letting the cows out does not mean you`ve let yourself out of overseeing animal care. It does mean paying attention to nutrition and management details.  In the simplest terms there are only three steps.

  1. Do the analysis.
  2. Get over the paralysis.
  3. Go for it!!

 

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

 

 

 

Global Warming and Its Effect on Dairy Cattle

Over the past few weeks we have certainly seen some extreme weather conditions around the world.  Those on the east coast of North America have been hit by record cold temperatures.  At the same time, those in Australia have been experiencing record hot temperatures.  These extreme weather conditions have many wondering what effects “Global Warming” will have on the dairy cattle  There has been lots of coverage in the media about  dairy cattle and their alleged contribution to greenhouse gases and how that is contributing to Global Warming.  Very little has been addressed about the effects extreme weather conditions have on the dairy cattle themselves.  One thing appears certain.  Extreme heat waves and cold fronts are the new ‘normal’.

As producers know, cow and calf comfort is one of the most important factors in milk production and growth.  As more and more producers are experiencing extreme temperatures, keeping their animals comfortable is becoming harder.  Drastic increases or decreases in ambient temperature affects animal production systems by affecting the health, reproduction, nutrition etc. of the animals and thereby results in poor performance, inferior product quality, outbreak of novel diseases, etc.  Dairy cattle are   more susceptible to increased ambient temperature than other ruminants, because of their high metabolic rate and the poor water retention mechanism of their kidney and gastrointestinal tracts.  Young stock are not immune to these weather stresses either.

Greater temperature shifts and shifts that are more frequent seem to be the most obvious weather changes that will have effects on dairy cattle.  It is forecasted that we can expect even greater atmospheric temperature changes.  Therefore these issues are going to come to the forefront.  The following are the five major impacts   that global warming will have on dairy cattle.

  1. Ambient temperature’s effect on Dry Matter Intake (DMI)
    When cows are stressed their Dry Matter Intake (DMI) decreases.  As the heat rises DMI decreases.  Feed consumption by dairy cattle starts to decline when average daily temperature reaches 25 to 27 Centigrade  (77 to 81 Fahrenheit) and voluntary feed intake can be decreased by 10-35% when ambient temperature reaches 35 C (95 Fahrenheit) and above.  Conversely, cows that are experiencing extreme cold weather conditions increase their DMI intake drastically, but instead of the consumption being converted in to milk production, a much larger portion of their energy is committed to their maintenance energy requirements.  Thermal cold stress conditions result in 20-30% more maintenance energy requirement and an ensuing reduction in the amount of net energy available for growth and production.
  2. Increased respiratory rate
    When dairy cows experience increased thermal stress, their heart rate rises.  The heart rate of the animal under thermal heat stress is higher to ensure more blood flow towards peripheral tissue to dissipate heat from the body core to the skin.  This increased effort takes much needed energy away from milk production.  Respiration rate of the animal can be used as an indicator of the severity of thermal load but several other factors such as animal condition, prior exposures to high temperature etcetera should be considered to interpret the observed respiration rate.
  3. Decreased conception rates
    As weather stress increases, dairy reproduction function decreases, resulting in decreased conception rates.  This is a result of thermal stress that causes imbalance in secretion of reproductive hormones.  High ambient temperature has also been reported to increase incidence of ovarian cysts.  Plasma progesterone levels in animals under high ambient temperatures are low compared to animals that are experiencing thermal comfort.  It has also been reported that high ambient temperature causes poor quality of ovarian follicles resulting in poor reproductive performance in cattle.  Fertility of cattle is also reduced due to low intensity and duration of estrus caused by reduced luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol secretion during thermal stress.  In addition, thermal stress also causes decreased reproductive efficiency by increasing the calving interval. Calves born from dams under thermal stress were found to be of lower body weight than those from normal cows.  Additionally the dams had reduced lactation performance due to the carryover effects of thermal stress which occurred during the prepartum period.
  4. Decreased Metabolic Responses
    Under heat stress metabolism is reduced, which is associated with reduced thyroid hormone secretion and gut motility, resulting in increased gut fill.  Plasma growth hormone concentration and secretion rates decline with high temperature (35 ºC / 95 ºF).  Ruminal pH is typically lower in heat stressed cattle
  5. Decreased Milk Production
    Reduction in milk production is one of the major economic impacts of climatic stress upon dairy cattle.  Decrease in milk yield due to thermal heat stress is more prominent in Holstein than in Jersey cattle (Read more…).  Decreased synthesis of hepatic glucose and lower non esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels in blood during thermal stress causes reduced glucose supply to the mammary glands and results in low lactose synthesis, which in turn leads to low milk yield.  As mentioned earlier, reduction in milk yield is further intensified by decrease in feed consumption by the animals to compensate for high environmental temperature.  Actually 35% of reduced milk production is due to decreased feed intake while the remaining 65% is attributable directly to the thermal stress.  Other factors resulting in reduced milk production during thermal stress are decreased nutrient absorption, negative effects on rumen function and hormonal status and increased maintenance requirements.  These all mean that there is reduced net energy available for production.

To combat heat stress check out these articles (Read more: Are you feeling the heat?  and Heat Stress on Dairy Cattle) and to combat cold stress (Read more: COMMON SENSE, COWS and the UN-COMMON COLD of 2014!“COLD CALVES” – The Next Drama Coming to a Calf Pen Near You! and Cold Weather Effects on Dairy Cattle)

The Bullvine Bottom Line

There is no question that the world’s temperatures are changing because of atmospheric pressure changes caused by Global Warming.  Warming or cooling of the climate system of the earth has multifaceted effects on animals.  Intensification and increased frequency of thermal stress due to global warming has the most prominent impact on dairy cattle and causes   different physiological, metabolic and production disturbances.  The importance of responding to thermal stress has been increased for dairy farmers in tropical, subtropical and even in temperate regions of the world due to atmospheric warming.  As these effects increase, it will be increasingly urgent for the milk producers of the world to provide environments that are able to combat these effects and offer the greatest comfort for their cattle.  Global Warming is actually Global Warning for the dairy industry.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Are You Going To Make a Profit This Year?

Every day during this summer of 2012 dairy breeders are reading about or personally experiencing the challenges of feeding their dairy herd.  The articles in the press deal with the cost of corn and soybeans as well as the quantity and quality for forages preserved or available for purchase.  Since the cost of feed to produce a pound or kilogram of milk is usually 55 to 60% of the cost of production, feeding the dairy herd is extremely important.

In a recent article the Bullvine addressed key factors that contribute to profit on farm ( read Why Dairy Farmers Need To Know Their Key Performance Indicators).  However, for many dedicated North American dairy cattle farmers the immediate challenge is to implement steps that will contribute to or assist with profitability until we have another crop-growing season.  The following ideas are offered based on the results I saw from working with success farms participating in dairy farm management clubs.

A Check List for Managing

  1. Know your facts
    A saying often herd is “If you don’t measure, you can’t manage.”  So taking time to review the details on your last milk cheque, your current feed bills, your daily feed fed and the information for the past two years from your DHI printouts or from your farm management software reports, all are key to getting started.  Also critical to taking positive steps is the farm manager’s attitude to problem solving on farm.  Yes prices received and prices paid are important but most frequently they are mainly outside individual manager’s control.
  2. Output per Cow
    Simply put farms producing over 5 pounds or 2.3 kgs of fat plus protein per cow per day return between 25 to 40% more profit per cow per day than farms producing 4 pounds or 1.8 kgs per cow per day.  Filling the bulk tank with 100 cows producing 55 pounds (25 kgs) or 79 cows producing 70 pounds (32 kgs) is what this equates to.  Those extra 21 mouths to feed are paramount to profit.  Moving the lower producing cows to dry pens, selling below average producers for meat or buying of bringing in, take care to protect biosecurity (read more Biosecurity – How Safe Is Your Dairy or Biosecurity: Control What’s Coming In, Going Out Or Going Around), animal about to calve or recently fresh are all steps that will move the herd to more profit per milking cow per day.
  3. Dry Matter Intake (DMI)
    Average DMI of at least 50 pounds (23 kgs) of feed are achievable.  Herds with DMI’s over 55 pounds (25 kgs) make 15 to 25% more profit per cow per day than herds with a DMI of less than 44 pounds (20 kgs).  However, feed intake averages and profit per cow per day are not achieved by feeding the average cow.  Keys to achieving desired levels of DMI and profit are caring and grouping of cows and heifers three weeks before and after calving, feeding the highest quality forage to the cows producing the most milk and not overfeeding cows later in lactation in any year not just when feeds are in short supply or high in price.
  4. Feed Quality
    Without feed testing or knowing the quality of feeds, be it home grown or purchased feeds, decisions and corrective actions cannot be taken.  Managing for profit and using feed resources wisely depend knowing the products you are working with.
  5. The Heifer Herd
    Managing for profit is greatly influenced by how the heifer herd is feed and managed.  Not raising all heifer calves, feeding heifers according to their needs (high quality feed to heifers in their first three months), using milk replacer instead of keeping extra cows so calves can get be feed whole milk and breeding heifers to calve by 24 months of age all need re-consideration in times of tight feed supply, lower quality feeds, and expensive feedstuffs.  Having 0.7 or 1.1 heifers per milking cow can significantly affect profit through feed cost, labour costs and overhead costs. (read 10 Ways Cool Calves Beat The Heat)
  6. Manage Reproduction
    In times of high costs, lack of plentiful feed supply and pressure on the time to manage, managers take steps (often inadvertently) not to check as often for heats or eliminate regular visits by the herd reproduction specialists.  Current estimates run between $75 to $110 for every heat that a cow or heifer is either not bred on or does not conceive on.  Of course that cost is a function of taking more feed, more labour, more animals on-farm and more time to manage.
  7. The Basics are Important
    We all know how nice it is to have fresh air to breathe, our climate controlled and a fresh glass of clean water.  Well animals are no different.  Clean waterers, lack of manure build-up near animals and clean air all lead to high performance by dairy cattle.  Documented and delivered herd protocols are important and can be neglected in times of stress including when feedstuffs are in short supply.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Success in business very often is associated with managing to be ahead of challenges rather than in reaction to circumstances.  Profits on dairy farms depend on providing the crucial trinity, feed, environment and genetics.  Doing only two of the three is not sufficient.

Send this to a friend