Image
FacebookEmailTwitterRSS

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Overlays

Archive for precision breeding

20 Generations to One: What Europe’s Gene Editing Decision Means for the Future of Your Herd

Saturday, December 6th, 2025

One generation instead of twenty. That’s what gene editing offers for heat tolerance—and Europe just accelerated the timeline. The dairy producers paying attention now will be the ones leading in five years.

Executive Summary: Twenty generations through traditional breeding—or one with gene editing. That’s the new math for traits like heat tolerance, disease resistance, and polled genetics, and it’s not hypothetical: heat-tolerant cattle are FDA-approved, Brazil has gene-edited Holsteins in commercial herds, and Europe’s December 4 agreement just accelerated the global timeline. The economic stakes are clear. U.S. dairy loses up to $1.6 billion annually to heat stress alone, with hot-climate operations absorbing several hundred dollars per cow each summer. What sharpens the urgency is the compounding effect—genetic advantages multiply over generations, which is why producers who moved early on genomic selection built leads their competitors are still chasing a decade later. This analysis covers where regulations stand, what’s available today, legitimate concerns that deserve honest consideration, and practical steps for positioning strategically. The technology is proven. The producers paying attention now will shape the next decade of dairy genetics—not spend it catching up.

I was talking with a producer in central Texas last month who told me something that stuck with me. He’d calculated his heat-related losses across the past summer: reduced milk production, reproduction failures, increased health events, and the energy costs of running cooling systems around the clock for four straight months. His number came to several hundred dollars per cow—losses he could measure but couldn’t fully prevent, no matter how much he invested in fans and sprinklers.

That conversation was fresh in my mind when news broke from Brussels on December 4, 2025. After all-night negotiations and years of fierce debate, EU policymakers reached a provisional agreement allowing gene-edited crops to bypass the bloc’s strict GMO regulations. The immediate focus is on plants—wheat, tomatoes, that sort of thing. But here’s why that Texas conversation matters: among the dairy cattle applications currently working through research pipelines is gene-edited heat tolerance. The kind that could fundamentally change that producer’s math.

The question isn’t really whether gene editing will become part of dairy cattle breeding. The science is proven, commercial animals already exist in some markets, and regulatory doors are opening. The real question is how individual operations position themselves as these tools become available—or whether they’ll spend years trying to catch up with competitors who moved earlier.

The Global Regulatory Landscape: Where Things Stand

Before diving into the science and economics, it helps to understand the regulatory patchwork that will determine when and how gene-edited genetics reach your market. Here’s where major dairy regions currently stand:

RegionRegulatory StatusLivestock Included?Current Availability
European UnionNGT regulation provisionally agreed December 4, 2025; formal adoption expected early 2026Plants only initially; livestock framework to followNot yet available
United KingdomPrecision Breeding Act in full force as of November 13, 2025Yes—includes cattleFramework ready; commercial products developing
United StatesCase-by-case FDA review via “low-risk determination” processYesHeat-tolerant cattle approved March 2022; other traits under review
CanadaGuidance for gene-edited livestock is still developing under Health Canada and CFIAPendingNot yet available
BrazilCTNBio approved gene-edited cattle for breeding and food useYesHeat-tolerant Holsteins approved 2023

Sources: European Parliament (December 2025), Morrison Foerster regulatory analysis (November 2025), FDA Risk Assessment Summary (March 2022), CTNBio public records (2023)

What Brussels Actually Decided (And Why It Creates Precedent)

Let me walk you through what the EU agreement actually does, because the details matter for understanding where this is heading.

The new framework creates two categories for plants developed using what regulators call “New Genomic Techniques,” or NGTs:

  • Category 1: Plants with genetic changes that could theoretically occur through natural mutation or conventional crossbreeding. These skip the GMO approval process entirely—no mandatory safety assessments for each generation, and final food products won’t need special labels (though seeds will be marked).
  • Category 2: Plants with more complex modifications that go beyond what conventional breeding could achieve. These still face the full regulatory process.

That’s according to the European Parliament’s official announcement from December 4. The European Commission’s press release emphasized the regulation’s potential to develop plant varieties more resilient to climate change while requiring fewer pesticides. Copa-Cogeca, representing EU farmers and agricultural cooperatives, expressed strong support. Thor Gunnar Kofoed, chair of their working party on plant breeding, called it “a turning point for European agriculture.”

Now here’s what I find interesting for livestock producers: this regulation specifically covers plants, not animals. But the product-based framework being established—evaluating what a genetic change does rather than reflexively restricting how it was made—creates a template. When gene-edited livestock applications eventually reach European regulators, there’s now a philosophical precedent for how to approach them.

Key Regulatory Dates to Watch

  • November 2025: UK Precision Breeding Act takes full effect, including livestock provisions
  • Early 2026: EU NGT regulation expected to receive formal adoption
  • Ongoing: FDA continues case-by-case “low-risk determination” reviews for gene-edited livestock traits
  • TBD: Health Canada and CFIA guidance for gene-edited livestock expected to develop further

The Climate Challenge That Traditional Breeding Can’t Solve Fast Enough

Here’s where this discussion gets personal for many operations, especially if you’re farming in areas where summers are becoming more difficult for your herd.

The economic impact of heat stress on U.S. dairy is substantial—and probably larger than many producers fully account for. The foundational study by St-Pierre and colleagues, published in the Journal of Dairy Science in 2003, estimated annual industry-wide losses between $897 million and $1.5 billion. More recent work from Ohio State University researchers suggests losses can reach $1.6 billion annually as summer conditions have intensified across much of dairy country.

Regional heat stress impacts vary significantly:

  • Upper Midwest (Wisconsin, Minnesota): University of Wisconsin researchers measured costs at roughly $74 per cow based on milk yield losses alone—relatively moderate but still meaningful
  • Southeast (Florida, Georgia): Losses several times higher; some Florida operations have spent decades working with Senepol and Gir crossbreeding programs to introduce natural heat tolerance, with real success—but also real tradeoffs in production genetics that take years to breed back
  • Southwest (Texas, Arizona): Producers report losses of several hundred dollars per cow when factoring reproduction failures, health events, and cooling costs
  • California Central Valley: Compounding the challenge of water constraints alongside rising temperatures, affecting both cooling capacity and irrigated feed production

A study published in Science Advances this past July really crystallized the scope of the problem. The research, led by Claire Palandri at the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy, analyzed production data from over 130,000 cows across 12 years of Israeli dairy records—one of the most comprehensive datasets ever assembled on heat-stress impacts.

Key findings from the Palandri study:

  • A single day of extreme heat can reduce milk production by 10 percent
  • That suppression can persist for more than 10 days after temperatures return to normal
  • Even with cooling systems in place, mitigation effectiveness dropped to around 40 percent during extreme heat events
  • Cooling “cut losses in half” at moderate temperatures, but became progressively less effective as conditions worsened

There appears to be a ceiling to what management interventions can accomplish when ambient temperatures push into truly dangerous territory.

So what’s the traditional breeding alternative? You could crossbreed with heat-adapted cattle—Senepol, Gir, or Carora breeds that carry what’s called the “slick coat” gene naturally. The challenge, as anyone who’s tried it knows, is the timeline.

Timeline Comparison: Traditional Breeding vs. Gene Editing

Traditional approach to adding heat tolerance to elite Holsteins:

  • Initial crossbreeding + 20 generations of backcrossing
  • Approximately 5 years per generation
  • Total timeline: 80-100+ years to recover elite genetics with a new trait

Gene editing approach:

  • Direct introduction of the slick coat allele to elite genetics
  • Single generation
  • Timeline: Available for breeding in current genetic lines

Dr. Appolinaire Djikeng, Director of the Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health at the Roslin Institute in Scotland, has explained that gene editing can accomplish in one generation what would otherwise take 20 generations through conventional breeding.

One generation versus twenty. For operations facing mounting heat pressure right now, that’s not an incremental improvement—that’s a fundamentally different approach to the problem.

What’s Actually Available Today

This isn’t all laboratory work and future promises. Commercial gene-edited cattle exist today, though availability depends significantly on where you’re located and what regulatory frameworks apply.

Heat-Tolerant Genetics

The U.S. FDA issued its first “low-risk determination” for PRLR-SLICK cattle back in March 2022. The FDA’s risk assessment confirms that these were cattle developed by Acceligen, primarily beef animals initially, but the regulatory pathway has since been opened for dairy applications.

Potential benefits:

  • Improved heat dissipation without crossbreeding tradeoffs
  • Maintained elite production genetics (butterfat, protein, yield)
  • Single-generation trait introduction
  • Reduced cooling infrastructure dependence

Current status: Commercial animals exist in the U.S. and Brazil; they are not yet widely distributed in North American dairy markets.

Disease Resistance (BVD)

USDA researchers at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center have produced calves with dramatically reduced susceptibility to Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus. The approach, published in PNAS Nexus in May 2023, used CRISPR editing to modify just six amino acids in the CD46 gene.

Potential benefits:

  • Reduced BVD infection severity and transmission
  • Fewer secondary bacterial infections in calves
  • Decreased antibiotic dependence
  • Improved calf survival and performance

Verification data: After 20 months of monitoring, researchers found no off-target effects anywhere in the genome. The edited calf showed minimal clinical signs and no detectable viral infection in white blood cells when challenged.

Current status: Research stage; not yet commercially available.

Polled (Hornless) Genetics

Gene editing allows the naturally occurring polled allele to be introduced directly into elite dairy genetics without production tradeoffs.

Potential benefits:

  • Eliminates the need for dehorning/disbudding
  • Reduced calf stress and pain
  • Labor and medication cost savings
  • Improved welfare optics for retail markets

Important caveat: In 2019, FDA scientists discovered that Recombinetics’ gene-edited polled bulls contained bacterial DNA that had been accidentally introduced alongside the intended edit. MIT Technology Review broke that story, and it set the field back years. Verification protocols have since improved substantially.

Current status: Approaching commercialization; enhanced screening is now standard.

Methane Reduction

UC Davis and the Innovative Genomics Institute announced a $70 million, seven-year project in 2023 using CRISPR to re-engineer rumen microbial communities.

Potential benefits:

  • One-time calf treatment (not daily feed additives)
  • No ongoing compliance or costs
  • Targets methane-producing archaea directly
  • Potential carbon credit value

Current status: Early research stage; commercial availability likely 5+ years out.

The Economics: Understanding What’s Actually at Stake

Let me work through the financial picture, because this is ultimately where the decision-making happens for most operations.

Direct heat stress recovery potential:

For a 1,000-cow herd in a hot climate, recovering even a portion of heat-related losses could translate to:

  • Tens of thousands of dollars annually in recovered milk production
  • Improved reproduction rates that compound over time
  • Fewer fresh cow challenges are cascading through the transition period
  • Reduced cooling infrastructure and energy costs

Emerging carbon/sustainability value:

A typical dairy cow emits roughly 100-125 kg of methane annually (based on Canadian research and IPCC modeling), which translates to about 2.5-3.5 tonnes of CO₂-equivalent. If gene-based solutions achieve the 30-50 percent reductions researchers are targeting, that represents meaningful potential value. Several major cooperatives and processors—including initiatives from organizations such as Dairy Farmers of America and various state-level sustainability programs—are beginning to develop premium structures for verified emissions reductions. These markets are still developing and vary considerably by region and processor, but the trajectory is clear.

The compounding factor:

Here’s the economic dynamic that I think deserves more attention than it typically gets: genetic advantages compound over generations.

Think back to what happened with genomic selection. According to CDCB data and a comprehensive review published in Frontiers in Genetics in 2022:

  • Genomic selection roughly doubled the rate of genetic gain for many traits
  • Annual net merit increases jumped from around $40 to approximately $85
  • Producers who moved early built advantages that compounded with every breeding cycle
  • The cautious crowd found themselves years behind on the genetic curve—a gap that proved surprisingly difficult to close

Will gene editing follow the same pattern? Early indications suggest it might. Once gene-edited traits are integrated into elite genetics and multiplied through AI, the same compounding dynamic kicks in.

What Consumers Actually Think

One concern I hear regularly from producers: “This all sounds interesting, but consumers will never accept milk from gene-edited cows.”

The research tells a more nuanced story.

What surveys consistently show:

  • Consumer concerns center primarily on transparency and choice—not categorical rejection
  • Only about one in five consumers indicate they’d refuse to purchase gene-edited products entirely
  • The majority want information and the ability to make informed choices, not outright prohibition

What influences acceptance:

  • Framing matters enormously—purchase intent increases substantially when applications are explained in terms of:
    • Animal welfare (reduced antibiotic use, disease prevention, and eliminating painful procedures)
    • Environmental benefits (lower emissions, reduced resource use)
  • The Vermont GMO labeling experiment is instructive: when mandatory labeling was implemented in 2016, researchers Kolodinsky (University of Vermont) and Lusk (now at Purdue) found that opposition to genetically engineered food fell by 19 percent. Their findings, published in Science Advances in 2018, suggest transparency defuses anxiety rather than amplifying it.

What damages acceptance:

  • Opacity and perceived deception
  • Products appearing on shelves without disclosure, discovered later through media or activist campaigns
  • The path to sustained acceptance runs through honesty about what’s being done and why
If you’re worried consumers will reject milk from gene-edited cattle, you need to see what actually happened when transparency was tested. Vermont’s 2016 mandatory GMO labeling experiment—studied by researchers Kolodinsky and Lusk and published in Science Advances in 2018—found something striking: opposition to genetically engineered food fell by 19 percentage points when clear labeling was implemented. Without disclosure, only about 20% of consumers accept gene-edited products. With honest information about what’s being done and why—especially when framed around animal welfare and environmental benefits—acceptance jumps to 81%. The lesson is clear: consumers don’t reject transparency. They reject opacity and the feeling they’re being deceived. The path to market acceptance for gene-edited dairy genetics runs directly through honest communication about welfare improvements, reduced antibiotic dependence, and environmental benefits. Hide what you’re doing, and you’ll face rejection. Explain it clearly, and the data suggests most consumers are fine with it.

Engaging with Legitimate Concerns

I want to spend time on criticisms that have genuine substance, because glossing over real challenges doesn’t serve anyone well.

Genetic Diversity

Let’s get honest about something the industry doesn’t like talking about. Holstein effective population size has collapsed to approximately 50—a genetic bottleneck that’s frankly dangerous for long-term herd resilience. At the same time, inbreeding in heifers is approaching 10 percent and climbing at +0.26% annually. This isn’t a theoretical concern—it’s a measurable crisis that threatens the biological viability of the breed. Here’s where the conversation gets uncomfortable: gene editing offers a genuine escape route by introducing carefully selected traits into broader genetics without further narrowing the gene pool. The irony is striking—we’re debating whether gene editing is “too risky” while we’ve collectively created an inbreeding crisis that may pose a far greater long-term threat. When critics raise genetic diversity concerns about gene editing, they’re not wrong to worry about concentration of traits. But the data suggests our current path—continuing to breed from an ever-narrowing pool of elite animals—is already catastrophic. Gene editing could actually help if deployed thoughtfully to expand options rather than narrow them further.
ConcernEvidenceCounterargument
Gene editing could accelerate genetic narrowingHolstein effective population size has dropped to ~50 (John Cole, CDCB Chief R&D Officer); Lactanet Canada’s August 2025 report shows Holstein heifers approaching 10 percent inbreeding, continuing the +0.26% annual increase from the 8.86 percent recorded for heifers born in 2021Gene editing could allow beneficial traits to be introduced into broader genetics—expanding options rather than narrowing them
Same elite bulls get edited, concentrating influence furtherValid concern if industry deploys technology narrowlyWhether gene editing helps or hurts diversity depends on how the industry uses it—that’s a choice, not an inherent feature

Off-Target Effects

ConcernEvidenceCurrent Mitigation
Unintended genetic modifications are possible2019 Recombinetics incident: bacterial DNA discovered in “precisely” edited polled bullsWhole-genome sequencing now enables comprehensive screening; newer editing technologies offer improved precision
Technology isn’t infallibleValid—the Recombinetics case demonstrated this clearlyBVDV-resistant calf showed zero off-target effects after 20 months of monitoring (PNAS Nexus, 2023); verification protocols have improved substantially

Patent Concentration

ConcernEvidencePotential Solutions
Few companies could control critical genetic improvementsFoundational CRISPR patents held by a small number of entitiesThe EU NGT framework includes a patent transparency database requirement
Seed industry consolidation as a cautionary parallelValid historical comparisonMost current breakthroughs are happening in public institutions (USDA, UC Davis, Roslin Institute); advocacy is needed for open licensing arrangements

International Trade Complexity

ChallengeImplication
Regulatory frameworks don’t align across jurisdictionsA bull with FDA approval may face different treatment in Canada, the EU, or export markets
Semen from gene-edited animals could face trade barriersOperations with an international genetics business need to navigate a complex patchwork
UK more permissive, EU evolving, North America case-by-caseCreates real operational considerations for genetics suppliers and larger breeding operations

Insurance and Liability

Insurance coverage, liability for off-target effects, and warranty frameworks for gene-edited animals remain unresolved. Larger operations considering early adoption should have conversations with insurers and legal advisors about how these animals fit into existing coverage structures.

A Dynamic Worth Watching: When the Ethics Shift

Here’s something I’ve been thinking about that doesn’t typically come up in industry discussions, but strikes me as potentially significant.

Currently, gene editing is associated with ethical risks for some audiences—it’s something certain advocacy groups criticize. But as welfare-positive applications mature and prove themselves, the ethical pressure may begin flowing in the opposite direction.

Consider the implications:

  • Once polled genetics that eliminate dehorning are commercially available and demonstrably safe, how do you justify continuing to disbud calves?
  • Once heat-tolerant genetics exist that meaningfully reduce chronic heat stress, how do you explain choosing not to use them where cows are visibly struggling?

The question shifts from “Why are you using gene editing?” to “Why aren’t you using available tools to prevent avoidable animal suffering?”

In markets with strong welfare audit frameworks—such as premium processors, retailers with animal welfare commitments, and European export channels—gene-edited traits may increasingly align with responsible animal husbandry expectations rather than conflict with them.

Practical Steps: What Makes Sense Right Now

If you’ve followed this discussion, you’re probably wondering what concrete actions are warranted. Here’s my perspective:

Immediate actions:

  • Track regulatory developments through breed associations and genetics suppliers
  • Understand what’s already cleared or approaching availability in your market
  • Assess your operation’s specific climate and disease vulnerabilities honestly

Conversations to start now:

Engage your genetics suppliers with these questions:

  • What gene-edited traits are you actively developing or licensing?
  • What’s your realistic timeline for commercial availability in my market?
  • How will gene-edited genetics be positioned and priced relative to conventional offerings?
  • What performance data do you have from trial herds or early commercial use?
  • How are you approaching genetic diversity considerations in your edited lines?
  • What are the implications for international semen sales or genetics trade?

Mental model to adopt:

Think about this as infrastructure, not just another product decision. Gene editing isn’t a discrete product to evaluate in isolation—it’s potentially foundational infrastructure that could reshape how genetic merit is defined, measured, and transmitted. The producers who recognized genomics as infrastructure back in 2010-2012 generally feel that perspective served them well.

The Bottom Line

The EU’s December decision didn’t resolve every question about gene editing in dairy cattle. Significant regulatory, commercial, and practical questions remain across multiple jurisdictions. But it signaled that major agricultural markets are moving toward science-based, outcome-focused regulation—evaluating what genetic changes accomplish rather than reflexively restricting the methods used to achieve them.

The underlying technology is proven and continuing to advance. Commercial animals exist in approved markets. Early-moving operations in Brazil and the UK are beginning to develop practical experience that will inform broader adoption decisions.

For producers weighing these developments, staying informed and engaged represents a reasonable first step. The next several years will likely determine which operations and regions effectively capture the benefits of climate-adapted, welfare-improved, lower-emission genetics—and which find themselves working to catch up with competitors who positioned themselves earlier.

These are decisions worth approaching thoughtfully. And honestly? They’re worth getting excited about, too. The technology is coming—the opportunity is in being ready for it.

Have questions about how gene editing developments might affect your operation? This is a conversation worth starting, and you don’t have to figure it out alone. Your genetics provider, land-grant extension specialist, or veterinarian would welcome the chance to think it through with you. Reach out, ask questions, and stay curious. That’s how the best producers have always stayed ahead.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Twenty generations becomes one: Gene editing compresses the timeline for adding heat tolerance, disease resistance, or polled genetics to elite dairy genetics—without the years of production tradeoffs that come with traditional crossbreeding.
  • This is commercial reality: Heat-tolerant cattle are FDA-approved (March 2022), Brazil has gene-edited Holsteins in production, and Europe’s December 4, 2025, agreement just accelerated global momentum. The technology works.
  • $1.6 billion in recoverable losses: That’s what U.S. dairy loses annually to heat stress alone. Hot-climate operations absorb several hundred dollars per cow each summer—costs that gene-edited heat tolerance directly addresses.
  • Genetic advantages compound: Producers who adopted genomic selection early built leads their competitors spent a decade chasing. Gene editing creates the same opportunity for those who position early—and the same risk for those who wait.
  • Start the conversation now: Talk to your genetics suppliers about what’s in their pipeline and what timelines look realistic. You don’t need to commit today, but understanding what’s coming lets you move strategically rather than reactively.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Genetics
Tags : , , , , ,

The Cellular Shift: What Dairy’s New Genetic Frontier Means for Your Operation

Thursday, September 18th, 2025

Is cellular genomics a breakthrough science or just another way to separate you from your money?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s what we discovered: while the industry pushes expensive genetic solutions, 75% of dairies still can’t properly use basic genomic tools—and it’s costing them $50-80 per cow annually in lost profits. But cellular genomics is about to flip this script entirely, with early data suggesting 10-12% milk production gains and massive cuts to health costs for operations smart enough to build the right foundation first. The uncomfortable truth? Most farms rushing into advanced genetics are skipping the fundamentals—solid phenotyping, top-quartile breeding stock, and systematic data collection that actually drive results. What’s encouraging is that sequencing costs are crashing to $8.85 per thousand cells, making precision breeding accessible beyond university labs for the first time. Regional adoption patterns tell the real story: Wisconsin cooperatives are methodically building genetic foundations while Western mega-dairies push integration limits, and Northeast premiums create different economic calculations entirely. The data suggests we’re at a tipping point where early movers will capture outsized returns over the next five years. Time to ask hard questions: is your operation ready to compete at the cellular level, or are you still fighting yesterday’s genetic wars?

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Dairies with solid genetic foundations average $50-80 additional profit per cow yearly from genomic selection—but most operations leave this money on the table through poor implementation.
  • Systematic phenotyping beats fancy genetics every time—track individual butterfat performance, fresh cow transition success, and reproduction efficiency before investing in cellular analysis.
  • Smart pilots work: test cellular genomics on your top 20-50 animals first to prove ROI before scaling up across the entire herd.
  • Technology costs are crashing fast—single-cell sequencing dropped to $8.85 per thousand cells, making precision breeding economically viable for mid-size operations.
  • Regional strategies matter: Wisconsin’s cooperative approach delivers steady gains, Western precision systems enable rapid scaling, while Northeast premiums justify different investment timelines.

Hey folks, grab a coffee and settle in—something is happening in dairy genetics that’s got my attention, and I think it should have yours too.

You know how frustrating it can be when two cows have nearly identical genomic evaluations but perform so differently in the parlor? Researchers at China Agricultural University recently published work in Nature Genetics this September, which is starting to provide us with real answers. They mapped over 1.79 million individual cells across 59 different tissues in dairy cattle.

Think about that for a minute. We’re not just talking about DNA or tissue-level analysis anymore—we’re looking at the actual cellular machinery that drives butterfat production, protein synthesis, and udder health.

What’s particularly interesting is that they identified 131 distinct cell types, including eight different subtypes of mammary epithelial cells. Those are your real workhorses cranking out milk components. For the first time, we can see exactly which cellular populations are doing what—and why some animals just seem to have that extra gear.

 This infographic illustrates the comprehensive cellular atlas created by China Agricultural University, showing how 131 different cell types work together in dairy cattle, with special emphasis on the 8 mammary epithelial subtypes that directly drive milk production.

The Technology Reality Check

Now, you’re probably thinking what I thought initially: this sounds expensive and complicated. And you know what? It is. But here’s what’s changed—costs have dropped dramatically from where they were even two years ago.

Industry reports show single-cell RNA sequencing running around $8.85 per thousand cells now. That’s still real money, but it’s moving into commercial viability… especially for operations already maximizing their genetic potential.

I’ve been talking with extension folks across Wisconsin and Cornell, and here’s what they keep emphasizing: you absolutely can’t skip the fundamentals. If your replacement heifers aren’t ranking in the top quartile for genomic evaluations, cellular analysis won’t create miracles. It’s like trying to tune a race car engine when you need basic mechanical work first.

What the Numbers Actually Tell Us

Let’s talk about what we know versus what we’re projecting—because there’s an important difference for your decision-making.

What we know for certain comes from documented data. Hoard’s Dairyman reports show genomic testing has been adding $50 to $80 per cow per year since implementation—that’s real money verified across thousands of operations over more than a decade.

The broader story is compelling, too. USDA production data shows we’ve increased milk production by nearly 19% over the past decade, with just 1% more cows. That efficiency gain can be attributed to the combination of better genetic selection and improved management.

This trend clearly shows how genomic selection and improved management have delivered remarkable efficiency gains—19% more milk with virtually the same number of cows. This validates the potential for further genetic advances like cellular genomics.

But here’s where I need to be straight about cellular genomics economics. Economic modeling—using similar frameworks to what university extension economists developed for genomic selection analysis—suggests a 500-cow operation might see $300,000 in annual returns from investing $75,000 upfront and $20,000 annually.

The theoretical modeling assumes potential improvements like:

  • 10-12% gains in milk production
  • 6-8% better feed efficiency
  • 15-20% fewer health events

But here’s the catch—these are theoretical projections based on economic modeling frameworks, not verified field results. We’re still waiting on comprehensive commercial validation, and actual results will vary significantly based on management, genetics, and environmental factors.

Regional Realities and What I’m Hearing

What I’ve been noticing in conversations across different regions is how varied the interest level is—and for reasons that make sense when you understand each area’s challenges.

In Wisconsin operations, many producers are taking a measured approach, building on their cooperative systems and strong university extension support. The message from Madison and the co-ops is consistent: get your genomic management solid first, then consider what’s next. The cooperative infrastructure there really helps with systematic adoption of new genetic technologies.

Out west, particularly in California and Idaho, larger operations with existing precision dairy infrastructure seem better positioned. They’re already collecting individual animal data on health events, reproduction performance, and component analysis through automated systems—the foundation cellular insights need to be meaningful. Heat stress management is a big driver there, too.

In the Northeast, where smaller herds often command premium milk prices, the cost-benefit calculation looks different. Extension folks from Vermont to Pennsylvania tell me producers are watching early adopters carefully, waiting to see real-world results before committing significant resources.

And that’s smart thinking. As many of us have seen with other technologies, the first ones through the gate usually learn some expensive lessons.

The Data Management Reality

Here’s something that comes up in every conversation: data quality is everything. Studies from Brazilian dairy operations and North American precision technology research consistently show that operations with robust data collection see better results from advanced genetic tools.

If you’re not systematically tracking:

  • Individual health events and treatments
  • Reproduction performance and breeding outcomes
  • Daily milk production and component data
  • Feed efficiency measurements, where possible

…then cellular genomics won’t help much. It’s like having a GPS with no destination—lots of information, but no clear direction.

The encouraging news? Many data collection practices needed for cellular-level breeding are the same ones that improve results from current genomic tools. So even if you wait on cellular analysis, strengthening your phenotyping practices pays dividends right now.

What Could Slow Things Down

Let’s be realistic about the challenges, because they’re real and worth considering.

Consumer perception remains a wild card. We’ve all seen how GMO concerns played out in European markets, and recent research shows people are still forming opinions about precision agriculture approaches. If retail chains start demanding “non-enhanced” labels, that could affect premium pricing.

Technology integration isn’t always smooth. Research published in animal science journals documents plenty of cases where sophisticated systems struggle in real farm environments. Power outages, connectivity issues, equipment failures—it all happens, and it can derail expensive investments faster than you’d think.

Regulatory landscapes vary dramatically. What’s acceptable in one region might face restrictions in another. The patchwork we’re seeing globally makes strategic planning more complicated for both companies and producers.

The Industry Positioning Game

What’s fascinating is watching how the major players are positioning themselves. Companies like Genus PLC and ABS Global are investing heavily in cellular capabilities, while newer biotech firms are carving out niches in specific applications.

But here’s what I find most interesting: smaller operations with specific challenges—chronic mastitis, heat stress, unique environmental conditions—might find cellular analysis gives them competitive tools that weren’t available when genetic improvement required massive progeny testing programs.

A dairy dealing with persistent udder health issues could potentially use cellular analysis to identify animals with superior immune cell populations. An operation battling heat stress might optimize for cellular mechanisms that maintain production under thermal challenges.

Looking Ahead: What I’m Tracking

Over the next 18 months, I’m watching several developments that’ll determine whether this follows genomic selection toward widespread adoption:

Field validation of economic projections—we need real-world data on whether these theoretical returns actually materialize on commercial operations.

Technology cost trends—will sequencing costs continue dropping to where mid-size operations can justify the investment? The trajectory looks promising, but it isn’t guaranteed.

Integration solutions—how well do cellular insights work with existing farm management systems? Early reports are mixed.

Regulatory clarity—will we get consistent approaches across major dairy markets, or continued fragmentation that complicates implementation?

Your Practical Next Steps

If you’re seriously considering this technology—and I think every progressive operation should at least be thinking about it—here’s what early adopters across different regions recommend:

Start with your genetic foundation. Extension research consistently shows operations need strong baseline genetics before advanced tools deliver meaningful returns:

  • Replacement heifers averaging the top 25% for genomic evaluations
  • Consistent breeding program with clear genetic goals
  • Solid understanding of current genetic strengths and weaknesses

Strengthen your data collection systems. Research shows this correlates directly with successful outcomes:

  • Systematic health event recording
  • Individual reproduction performance tracking
  • Milk component and production monitoring
  • Feed efficiency documentation where measurable

Consider a pilot approach. Test cellular analysis on 20-50 elite animals first:

  • Select genetically superior animals for initial analysis
  • Partner with research institutions or service providers
  • Compare results against traditional selection methods
  • Build team expertise gradually

Invest in education. Understanding cellular biology takes time, but it’s essential:

  • Extension workshops on precision breeding
  • Industry conferences on genomic advances
  • Collaboration with other early adopters
  • Technical training for key personnel

Key Questions for Your Operation

As you think about whether cellular genomics fits your future, consider these evaluation criteria that successful adopters recommend:

  • Is your genetic foundation strong enough? Are replacement heifers consistently ranking in the top quartile?
  • Can you handle the data requirements? Do you have the capacity for systematic phenotype recording and management?
  • What’s your risk tolerance? Are you comfortable investing in unproven technology?
  • How does this fit your timeline? Can you commit 12-24 months to building expertise?
  • What are your specific challenges? Do you have particular issues that cellular analysis might help address?

The Economic Reality Check

What I keep coming back to is the need for realistic expectations. Genomic selection delivered proven value—Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding data shows around $50-80 per cow annually since implementation. That’s documented, verified money that’s helped operations improve profitability.

If cellular genomics can build on that foundation with similar proven results, it could accelerate genetic progress significantly. However, we need to remain grounded about timelines as the technology matures.

The most successful technology adoptions in agriculture have been gradual, building on solid management foundations rather than trying to leapfrog fundamentals. The operations doing best with genomic selection today aren’t necessarily the ones that adopted it first—they’re the ones that integrated it thoughtfully with strong breeding programs.

The Bottom Line

What’s encouraging about this development is that it serves goals we all share: breeding cows that produce milk more efficiently, stay healthier longer, and adapt to changing conditions.

The cellular approach gives us biological insights rather than just statistical correlations. Instead of hoping population improvements translate to individual performance, we can see how cellular mechanisms actually create the traits we’re selecting for.

The cellular revolution isn’t science fiction anymore, but it’s not a magic bullet either. It’s a sophisticated tool requiring sophisticated management to use effectively.

The farms that thoughtfully evaluate both the potential and limitations will be best positioned for whatever comes next in dairy genetics. Whether you’re an early adopter or prefer learning from others’ experiences, staying informed helps you make better strategic decisions.

The conversation’s just getting started, and your perspective matters in shaping how this technology develops across our industry.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

  • A Comprehensive Guide to Enhanced Genetic Selection – This guide provides a practical blueprint for integrating various data points—pedigree, progeny, and genomics—to build a more accurate and profitable breeding program. It demonstrates how to use a custom index to align your herd’s genetic progress with specific operational goals, moving beyond a one-size-fits-all approach.
  • Creating the Perfect Dairy Cow…For Your Herd – This article takes a strategic look at building a genetic plan that factors in long-term market demands and profitability. It reveals how to use genomic tools and sexed semen to increase the pace of genetic gain, ensuring each new generation of cows is better equipped for long-term sustainability and economic success.
  • Genomics: Navigating the Balance Between Prediction and Chance – This piece offers a forward-looking perspective on the limits of current genomic models, exploring the role of gene interactions and environmental influences. It provides strategic advice for managing the unpredictability in genetics and building a flexible breeding program that is not solely reliant on genomic predictions.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : Genetics
Tags : , , , ,

AI for AI: Why Your Breeding Program Might Be Stuck in the Dark Ages

Wednesday, May 21st, 2025

AI isn’t just tech jargon—it’s revolutionizing dairy breeding. Farms ignoring it risk falling behind as competitors harness genetic precision and profit.

AI dairy breeding, genomic selection, dairy herd management, precision breeding, dairy farm technology

Artificial intelligence isn’t just transforming tech industries—it’s revolutionizing dairy breeding by delivering unprecedented precision in genetic selection, reproductive management, and health monitoring. Yet most farms continue using outdated breeding approaches based more on tradition than data. The uncomfortable truth? If you’re not leveraging AI in your breeding program today, you’re almost certainly leaving money on the table while your more progressive neighbors race ahead.

The acronym “A.I.” has long been familiar to dairy farmers worldwide—standing for artificial insemination, a cornerstone technology that transformed breeding programs decades ago. But today, there’s a new “AI” making waves across dairy farms—artificial intelligence—and its impact promises to be even more revolutionary than its namesake.

I recently witnessed this revolution firsthand while sitting at a farm management meeting. The dairy was progressive and forward-thinking, bringing together experts from various fields. After discussing issues tied to health, fertility, and milk production—looking at all potential causes and solutions—they began considering what set them apart from other dairies in the area.

The conclusion hit like a heavy blow: their genetics were poor. Despite all their effort, precision, and good planning, they would still achieve poorer outcomes than their neighbors simply because their genetics were weaker on average.

This reality check highlights why using the best tools available for your breeding program is critical. As someone once told me, “Always fight fairly, but don’t accept fair fights. Make sure you have an edge to win.” If your genetics aren’t strong, you’re starting with a disadvantage that’s hard to overcome.

Let’s be brutally honest: most dairy farmers still make breeding decisions like a decade ago, while the industry’s innovators have moved light-years ahead with AI-powered approaches.

Finding Hidden Inbreeding with Precision That Counts

Inbreeding is the silent productivity killer lurking in many herds, influencing everything from fertility to disease resistance. And it’s not always obvious—even with careful pedigree analysis, subtle genetic relationships can slip through undetected.

This is where AI’s pattern recognition capabilities shine. By analyzing complete genomic data, AI can identify obvious and hidden genetic similarities between animals, uncovering inbreeding risks that traditional methods miss entirely.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Holstein cows already have extremely limited genetic diversity—equivalent to having just 100-150 animals in the entire breed’s gene pool. Recent research from industry analyses published in The Bullvine reveals a troubling trend: genomic inbreeding (FROH) in elite Holstein bulls skyrocketed from approximately 5.7% in 2010 to 15.2% in 2020, while the number of active AI sires plummeted by 61%—from 2,734 to just 1,079—creating what experts call a “dangerous genetic bottleneck” that threatens the long-term viability of the breed.

The economic impact? According to studies published in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Dairy Science, each 1% increase in inbreeding has been associated with decreases in lifetime milk production by 177-400 pounds and a reduction in Net Merit by $23-$25. A cow with 15% genomic inbreeding compared to one at 5% could translate to a lifetime profit loss of $1,035-$1,890.

Why traditional inbreeding detection falls short

Traditional pedigree-based inbreeding calculations (FPED) have significant limitations. They rely on the completeness and accuracy of pedigree information and can’t capture the actual extent of homozygosity resulting from distant common ancestors or Mendelian sampling.

AI-powered genomic tools provide a more precise measure through what geneticists call “Runs of Homozygosity” (ROH)—contiguous segments of homozygous genotypes in an individual’s DNA. The cumulative length of these segments gives a direct and accurate measure of an animal’s true inbreeding level (FROH).

Have you looked beyond your pedigree-based inbreeding calculations lately? The genetic time bomb ticking in your herd might not show up until it explodes into fertility problems and production losses.

While natural or artificial selection may eventually purge harmful recessive mutations from a population over time, recent inbreeding is especially damaging because newer harmful mutations haven’t had sufficient time to be eliminated. Researchers from the Netherlands demonstrated in their study of Dutch Holstein-Friesian cattle that recent inbreeding is considerably more harmful than ancient inbreeding. AI helps track recent genetic relationships and spot inbreeding risks early, reducing the chance of problems like lower health, fertility, and productivity.

By removing the guesswork, AI offers farmers actionable insights that allow them to act quickly, maintaining essential genetic diversity while still making rapid genetic progress.

Predicting Genetic Outcomes: The Crystal Ball of Breeding

Imagine identifying which bulls will sire the next generation of productive, healthy cows, taking your farm’s specific environment into account. This isn’t science fiction—it’s what AI-powered genomic prediction is already delivering.

Let’s confront an uncomfortable truth: your “expert eye” for selecting animals isn’t nearly as good as you think it is. Dairy farmers are no strangers to making breeding decisions based on a blend of experience, intuition, and instinct. Many breeding companies already use genetic data to predict breeding outcomes. But AI takes this to an entirely new level by integrating genetic information and epigenetics, gene expression, and environmental factors—all while continuously refining its predictions through machine learning.

The proof is in the numbers. The annual genetic gain for Net Merit ($NM) in U.S. Holstein bulls surged from an average of just $13.50 per year during the traditional progeny testing era (2000-2004) to a remarkable $83.33 per year in the genomic era (2010-2022), as documented by research from the USDA Agricultural Research Service. That’s a six-fold increase in the rate of genetic improvement.

Charlie Will from Select Sires shared a compelling study in which he ranked bulls solely on genomic results and then tracked their actual daughter performance. The findings were remarkable—bulls predicted to be in the lowest quartile of their class never finished in the top quartile and vice versa. This predictive power translates directly into more efficient breeding decisions.

When was the last time you truly evaluated your breeding program’s rate of genetic gain? Are you sure you’re keeping pace with industry leaders, or are you falling further behind each year while telling yourself that your tried-and-true methods are good enough?

Fueled by genomics and biological data, AI can analyze complex patterns that would take years for humans to decipher. By integrating data from genomics, epigenetics, and gene expression, AI can predict traits like milk yield, udder health, and even temperament with unprecedented precision.

Optimizing Breeding Decisions: The Ultimate Strategy

If we can predict genetic outcomes accurately, why not optimize our choices between conventional, sexed, and beef semen? This is where AI shines by helping you develop a comprehensive breeding strategy tailored to your herd goals.

One of the economic risks of using beef-on-dairy is the potential reduction in heifer inventory, which can leave your dairy without adequate replacements for future milk production. AI can mitigate this risk by forecasting the genetic potential of your current replacement animals, ensuring a steady supply of genetically superior animals.

By optimizing breeding decisions, AI helps balance the need for beef calves—often used to capture premium markets—while maintaining a strong inventory of replacement heifers to keep your dairy operation sustainable.

Genetic Merit LevelBest Semen ChoiceExpected Outcome
Top 25%Sexed DairyMaximize genetic progress with high-quality replacement heifers
Middle 50%ConventionalBalance between replacements and operating cost
Bottom 25%BeefPremium crossbred calves with higher market value

A case study in accelerated genetic gain

Consider this compelling example from New Zealand: By combining genomic selection with strategic use of sex-selected semen on the top 50% of heifers (ranked by Breeding Worth), a dairy operation achieved in just three years what would have traditionally taken approximately eight years of genetic progress.

The predicted genetic gain increased from 184 to 384 BPI points, translating to an estimated financial benefit of NZD 72.96 per animal per year. Multiply that across an entire herd, and you’re looking at a substantial return on investment.

Are you still applying the same semen strategy to your entire herd? If so, you’re almost certainly wasting money on sexed semen for poor-genetic-merit animals while missing opportunities to maximize the value of your best genetics.

Uncovering Hidden Problems in Your Breeding Program

Sometimes, despite our best efforts, something’s off in the breeding program. Cows might not be getting pregnant as efficiently, or perhaps milk production or components are holding you back. It’s hard to pinpoint the issue without a deep dive into the data. This is where AI becomes a game changer.

AI can analyze thousands of variables—from cow health data to environmental factors to industry comparisons—and highlight patterns or anomalies that point to underlying issues. Maybe it’s a problem with heat detection or a genetic bottleneck you didn’t know existed.

Unlike human analysis, which can be subjective and limited by the number of factors we can mentally juggle, AI excels at finding needles in haystacks of data. It can detect subtle relationships between variables that might otherwise go unnoticed.

The industry’s secret is that most farms operate with significant inefficiencies they don’t even know exist. The days of relying solely on hunches are behind us—AI helps solve the puzzles we can’t see, helping you take corrective action before small issues snowball into bigger challenges.

Determining Voluntary Waiting Period with Data, Not Guesswork

One of the most challenging decisions in breeding is determining the right voluntary waiting period (VWP) for each cow in your herd and the optimal age at which to breed heifers.

If the period is too short, you might negatively affect the cow’s productivity in subsequent lactations and lose valuable milk. You lose valuable production time in the next lactation if it’s too long. This delicate balance has traditionally been managed with blanket herd policies that fail to account for individual animal variations.

Why are we still applying the same voluntary waiting period to every cow in the herd when we know each animal responds differently based on their genetic makeup, health history, and production level?

Think about it: you’ve got Cow A, a high-producing, second-lactation Holstein, cycling back strong at 30 DIM, practically begging to be bred. Next to her is Cow B, a first-calver still fighting her way out of negative energy balance at 50 DIM. Does a blanket 60-day VWP make a lick of sense for both? AI doesn’t just suggest “no”; it screams it, and the missed milk cheques or added days open are the proof.

Research from groups like Lactanet indicates extending the VWP can improve first-service conception rates, particularly in first-lactation animals. However, it may also delay the overall time of pregnancy for some cows. AI systems now help determine the optimal VWP based on each cow’s unique health, recovery, and performance data. By analyzing individual cow data in real-time—including genetic potential, health history, current body condition score, and recent production patterns—AI helps eliminate guesswork and enables well-informed, data-backed decisions that can be fine-tuned for each animal.

The real breakthrough comes from AI’s ability to dynamically assess which animals would benefit most from different reproductive approaches. For instance, cows exhibiting strong, early estrous activity during the VWP and having good health status might be eligible for insemination sooner. In contrast, cows that have experienced health issues or are in poor body condition might benefit from an extended VWP.

Comparing Actual Outcomes with Genomic Predictions

Most farmers use some form of genetic data to guide decisions aimed at optimizing future performance. But how often do we truly know if the predictions hold true in the real world?

What if AI could consider your specific environmental situation? For instance, a cow that might thrive under heat stress might not perform well in a cold-weather climate. By comparing actual farm outcomes with predictions made using parentage or genomic data, AI can help you assess the true outcomes of your breeding decisions.

How do your actual milk yield, fertility rates, and cow longevity compared to the predicted values derived from genomics? AI will help you refine these decisions over time, tailoring them specifically to your farm, your management style, and your environmental conditions.

Your farm isn’t a textbook operation, so why are you still using textbook solutions? This creates a powerful feedback loop that allows you to continuously improve your breeding strategy, ensuring you’re making the most accurate and efficient decisions possible.

Early Warning Systems: Detecting Disease and Distress Before Clinical Signs

Beyond breeding decisions, AI is revolutionizing how we monitor animal health and welfare. AI algorithms continuously analyze diverse data streams collected from various sensors (monitoring parameters like activity levels, body temperature, rumination patterns, and feeding behavior) to recognize when an animal deviates from its normal patterns.

The results are impressive: research published in Dairy Global demonstrates that machine learning models have achieved the ability to predict mastitis cases with accuracies as high as 72%. In comparison, deep learning network models have shown an average accuracy of 96.1% in mastitis detection. The Lactanet milk quality monitoring system, which incorporates AI, reportedly led to a 25% reduction in mastitis incidence through early detection and targeted interventions.

Similarly, AI systems have proven effective in identifying cows at high risk of metabolic disorders. At the same time, computer vision techniques can detect illness based on subtle changes in facial expressions or features that human observers might miss.

This capability for early detection allows for prompt, often less invasive interventions that can significantly reduce the severity and duration of illnesses, minimize associated production losses, lower treatment costs, and enhance animal welfare by alleviating suffering more rapidly.

We’re still diagnosing disease through visual observation when technology can detect health issues days before we see the first clinical sign. How many cases of mastitis or ketosis could you prevent if you knew they were coming 48-72 hours in advance?

From Monitoring to Personalized Care

The rich, multi-modal data collected and analyzed by AI systems paves the way for truly personalized animal management. By combining an animal’s genetic predispositions, health history, real-time physiological data, behavioral patterns, and environmental conditions, AI can help construct comprehensive, individualized health risk profiles and management plans for each animal in the herd.

This capability allows for the development of tailored veterinary care plans where preventative measures, diagnostic approaches, and treatment protocols are customized to each animal’s specific needs, risks, and predicted responses rather than applying a generalized, herd-level strategy.

The ability to provide this level of individualized care at scale—something previously impossible without AI—creates tremendous value for breeding programs. Animals that receive personalized care can express their genetic potential better, providing more accurate phenotypic data for subsequent genetic evaluations and breeding decisions.

Looking to the Future: Advanced Phenotyping and Novel Trait Selection

AI is pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in phenotyping—the measurement of physical and behavioral traits—allowing breeders to select for characteristics that were previously difficult or impossible to measure effectively.

Computer vision systems employing 2D and 3D cameras, thermal imaging, and various sensors collect detailed data that AI algorithms then process to extract meaningful phenotypic information.

These systems enable automated, non-invasive, and high-throughput assessment of complex traits like feed efficiency, methane emissions, heat tolerance, and behavioral characteristics. For example, machine learning models have demonstrated high accuracy (R²>0.9) in predicting body mass and condition score from morphological measurements obtained via imaging.

The ability to measure and select for previously intractable complex traits fundamentally expands the range of characteristics available for genetic improvement. By moving beyond traditional production traits to include welfare indicators, environmental impact factors, and resilience measures, AI is helping dairy breeding programs address the multifaceted demands of future farming systems.

What This Means for Your Operation

ROI Potential: Inbreeding Management

For a 100-cow herd with average genomic inbreeding of 10%, implementing AI-driven mating strategies to reduce inbreeding by just 3% could deliver:

  • Increased milk production: +681 pounds per cow per lactation
  • Improved fertility: -2.7 days open per cow
  • Financial impact: +$23,000-$25,000 herd-wide annually

This conservative estimate doesn’t include additional benefits from improved health, reduced calf mortality, and enhanced longevity.

Practical Steps: Implementing AI in Your Breeding Program

Despite its tremendous potential, the widespread adoption of AI in dairy breeding faces significant challenges that must be addressed. Here are practical steps you can take to begin implementing AI technologies in your operation:

  1. Start with data integration: The first step is to ensure your various data sources—milk recording, health records, reproductive data, genetic information—are accessible in formats that can be integrated and analyzed.
  2. Partner with progressive genetic providers: Work with breeding companies that are actively incorporating AI into their genetic evaluation systems and can provide farm-specific recommendations.
  3. Invest in sensor technologies: Consider implementing automated activity monitoring systems, rumination sensors, or other technologies that provide continuous data streams that AI can analyze.
  4. Begin with focused applications: Rather than trying to implement all aspects of AI at once, start with a specific challenge area, such as improving reproductive efficiency or reducing mastitis incidence.
  5. Build internal capacity: Invest in training for yourself and your staff to better understand and utilize the insights generated by AI systems.
  6. Collaborate with other producers: Form or join discussion groups with other progressive farmers who are implementing similar technologies to share experiences and lessons learned.

The Bottom Line: Are You Leading or Following?

The dairy industry is rapidly dividing into two groups: those who embrace AI technologies and those who will eventually be forced to catch up or be left behind. Our mission must be to transform AI from a mere buzzword into a powerful tool—a “cheat code” that helps dairy farmers achieve their visions for their herds.

AI allows farmers to make smarter, data-driven choices that improve herd health, boost productivity, and enhance profitability. With AI’s ability to analyze vast amounts of data, we’re not just working harder—we’re working smarter to unlock the full potential of dairy farming.

The potential of AI in breeding programs is immense. It’s a game changer for dairy farmers and will only improve. Beyond breeding, AI has the potential to revolutionize other areas of dairy farm management. For example, automation of classification for type traits traditionally done by technicians could be standardized through AI and camera systems, eliminating technician bias and variations in data collection.

Where will your farm be in five years? Leading the pack with cutting-edge AI technologies or scrambling to implement what your competitors have already mastered?

As we look to the future, the question isn’t whether AI will play a role in dairy farming but how quickly we can harness its power to transform the industry. By embracing AI today, we can unlock a brighter tomorrow for dairy farmers, where data-driven decisions drive success and innovation meets tradition to create a more sustainable, productive, and profitable future.

Take action now: Identify one aspect of your breeding program that could benefit from AI enhancement and take the first step this week. Whether it’s exploring genomic testing for your herd, implementing an activity monitoring system, or connecting with a progressive genetics provider, the time to start is today. The farms that embrace AI technologies now will likely be the industry leaders of tomorrow, enjoying competitive advantages in productivity, sustainability, and profitability that traditional approaches simply can’t match. Don’t get left behind in this breeding revolution—the future of dairy is intelligent, and that future is already here.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI detects genomic inbreeding risks traditional methods miss, preventing $1,890+/cow lifetime losses
  • Accelerates genetic gain 6x through precise genomic predictions (Net Merit $83 vs $13/year pre-AI)
  • Customizes reproductive strategies using real-time data – optimizes VWP, semen choices, and $72/head/year returns
  • Identifies subclinical health issues 48hrs before visible symptoms through sensor pattern analysis
  • Transition from “gut-feel” breeding to AI-powered decisions is now critical for herd competitiveness

Executive Summary:

Artificial intelligence is transforming dairy breeding through six game-changing applications: detecting hidden inbreeding with genomic precision, predicting genetic outcomes like milk yield and fertility, optimizing semen strategies, uncovering herd management blind spots, personalizing voluntary waiting periods, and validating genomic predictions against real-world performance. By analyzing vast datasets from sensors, genomics, and farm records, AI enables data-driven decisions that accelerate genetic progress by 6x compared to traditional methods while preventing costly inbreeding pitfalls. Early adopters gain significant competitive advantages in productivity and profitability, while lagging farms face mounting genetic bottlenecks and missed revenue opportunities. The article urges producers to implement AI tools now to future-proof their operations.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Categories : A.I. Industry
Tags : , , ,

Genomic Testing Transforms Profit Potential for the UK’s Dairy Herd: Key Insights from AHDB Analysis

Friday, July 5th, 2024

Learn how genomic testing is improving the profitability of the UK’s dairy herds. Are you using genetic insights to enhance your farm’s profits? Find out more.

Imagine a future where the United Kingdom’s dairy farms keep pace with global competitors and lead in efficiency and profitability. This potential is swiftly becoming a reality thanks to advancements in genomic testing of dairy heifers. 

The latest analysis from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) underscores the significant financial benefits of genomic testing. It reveals a substantial gap in the Profitable Lifetime Index (£PLI) between herds engaging in genomic testing and those not. This article delves into the financial impact of genomic testing for the UK’s dairy herd, highlighting its potential to boost profitability and sustainability significantly. Improving genetics through genomic testing is a cost-effective and sustainable way to make long-term improvements to any herd. 

Genomic testing is revolutionizing dairy farming. It is a powerful tool for enhancing herd profitability and sustainability. We’ll examine the statistical evidence of PLI differences, theoretical and actual financial benefits, and the significant rise in genomic testing of dairy heifers. Additionally, we’ll address the issue of misidentified animals and the breeding implications. 

Genomic testing has dramatically shaped the industry since its introduction to UK producers. This transformative approach boosts farm profitability and ensures long-term sustainability. By leveraging genomic testing, dairy producers can make informed decisions that profoundly impact their operations and the broader agricultural economy.

Genomic Testing Revolutionizes Genetic Merit of UK Dairy Herds: AHDB Reveals Significant PLI Disparity with Profound Implications for Productivity and Profitability 

Genomic testing is revolutionizing the genetic merit of the UK’s dairy herd, significantly boosting productivity and profitability. The Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) reports a £193 gap in the average Profitable Lifetime Index (£PLI) between herds heavily engaged in genomic testing and those less involved. 

Producers testing 75-100% of their heifers have an average £PLI of £430 for their 2023 calves, compared to £237 for those testing 0-25%. This stark difference underscores the critical role genomic testing plays in improving the genetic quality of dairy cattle. It enhances health, longevity, and productivity, making it a powerful tool for herd management and breeding strategies. 

This £193 PLI difference translates to an estimated £19,300 profit potential for a 175-head herd. However, real-world accounts show the benefits can exceed £50,000. This underscores the significant financial rewards that genomic testing can bring, making it a vital tool for informed breeding decisions that drive long-term economic and genetic gains.

Potential Gains and Real-World Financial Impact of Comprehensive Genomic Testing in Dairy Herds

Genomic testing offers a compelling route to profitability for dairy producers. Herds genotyping 75-100% of their heifers achieve an average £430 PLI, while those testing only 0-25% lag at £237. 

This gap translates into significant gains. A 175-head herd could theoretically gain £19,300. However, real-world data suggests that the financial advantage can exceed £50,000, highlighting the profound impact of genomic testing on profitability.

Marco Winters Advocates Genomic Testing: A Cost-Effective and Sustainable Path to Long-Term Herd Improvement

Marco Winters, head of animal genetics for AHDB, underscores the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of improving herd genetics through comprehensive genomic testing. “Genetics is probably the cheapest and most sustainable way of making long-term improvements to any herd,” Winters notes. “And when it’s aimed at boosting profitability, the benefits directly impact a farm’s bottom line.” 

Winters highlights that significant returns outweigh the initial investment in genomic testing. A 175-head herd can see theoretical profit gains of £19,300, but actual accounts show this figure can exceed £50,000. 

Additionally, Winters emphasizes the sustainable nature of genomic testing. Enhancing herd health and productivity helps farmers avoid recurring costs associated with other improvement strategies, ensuring long-term viability and a competitive edge for UK dairy farms.

Precision Breeding Through Genomic Insights: Revolutionizing Herd Management and Breeding Strategies 

As genomic testing gains traction, its implications for herd management are profound. With 20% of the recorded herd currently undergoing tests, which is expected to rise, dairy farmers recognize the potential within their livestock’s DNA. This shift highlights the industry’s evolution towards data-driven decision-making in animal husbandry, with genomic insights becoming a cornerstone of successful herd management strategies. 

Genotyping not only clarifies lineage but also opens avenues for targeted genetic improvements. By identifying the exact genetic makeup of heifers, farmers can make informed decisions, enhancing traits such as milk production, health, and fertility. This precision breeding minimizes the risk of inbreeding. It ensures that the most viable and productive animals are chosen as replacements. 

The financial benefits of genomic testing are evident. Benchmarking herds using tools like the AHDB’s Herd Genetic Report allows farmers to understand the impact of their genetic strategies on profitability. The industry benefits from increased efficiency and productivity as the national herd shifts toward higher genetic merits. 

Genomic testing extends beyond Holstein Friesians to Channel Island breeds and Ayrshires, showing its broad applicability. This comprehensive approach to herd improvement underscores the AHDB’s commitment to leveraging cutting-edge biotechnologies to drive progress in dairy farming. 

In conclusion, genomic testing is reshaping dairy farming in the UK. By embracing these technologies, farmers enhance the genetic potential of their herds, securing a more profitable and sustainable future. Genomic insights will remain a cornerstone of successful herd management strategies as the industry evolves.

Harnessing the AHDB’s Herd Genetic Report: A Strategic Blueprint for Elevating Genetic Potential and Ensuring Herd Sustainability 

Farmers aiming to optimize their herd’s genetic potential should take full advantage of the AHDB’s Herd Genetic Report. This invaluable resource allows producers to benchmark their herd’s Profitable Lifetime Index (£PLI) against industry standards and peers. Farmers can gain critical insights into their herd’s genetic strengths and weaknesses, enabling more informed and strategic decisions regarding breeding and herd management. Accurately tracking and measuring genetic progress is essential for maintaining competitiveness and ensuring dairy operations’ long-term sustainability and profitability.

The Bottom Line

The transformative impact of genomic testing on the UK’s dairy herds is evident. Producers leveraging genotyping for heifers see remarkable gains in their Profitable Lifetime Index (£PLI), leading to significant financial rewards. This underscores the crucial role of genetic advancement, widening the gap between engaged and less engaged herds and inspiring a new era of progress in the industry. 

Accurate breeding records become essential with rising genomic testing across various breeds and corrections of misidentified animals. Integrating genomic insights into herd management allows producers with better genetic information to achieve superior outcomes. AHDB’s analysis reveals a shift from a sole focus on milk production to a balanced focus on health, management, and fertility, setting a new standard for future strategies and ensuring the reliability of genomic testing.

Every dairy producer should utilize tools like the AHDB’s Herd Genetic Report to benchmark and enhance their herd’s genetic potential. Embracing genomic testing is an investment in long-term success, revolutionizing herd management for profitability and sustainability in a competitive dairy market.

Key Takeaways:

  • Genomic testing significantly elevates the genetic merit of dairy herds, leading to more pronounced differences between the top-performing and bottom-performing herds.
  • Producers who genotyped 75-100% of their dairy heifers achieved an average Profitable Lifetime Index (£PLI) of £430, while those testing only 0-25% had a PLI of £237.
  • Improved genetics can translate to a theoretical value difference of approximately £19,300 for a typical 175-head herd, with actual margins showing an advantage exceeding £50,000.
  • The uptick in genomic testing is notable, with around 100,000 dairy heifer calves tested, representing 20% of the recorded herd, expected to rise to 35% by year’s end.
  • A significant number of animals have been misidentified, indicating potential inaccuracies in breeding strategies that could affect both quality and inbreeding rates.

Summary: 

The UK’s Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) has identified a significant gap in the Profitable Lifetime Index (PLI) between herds engaged in genomic testing and those not. This highlights the financial benefits of genomic testing for the UK’s dairy herd, which can significantly boost profitability and sustainability. Improving genetics through genomic testing is a cost-effective and sustainable way to make long-term improvements to any herd. The £193 PLI difference translates to an estimated £19,300 profit potential for a 175-head herd, but real-world accounts show the benefits can exceed £50,000. Precision breeding through genomic insights is revolutionizing herd management and breeding strategies, with 20% of the recorded herd currently undergoing tests. Genotyping not only clarifies lineage but also opens avenues for targeted genetic improvements, enhancing traits such as milk production, health, and fertility.

Learn more:

Categories : Genomics
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Role of Genomic Information in Managing Inbreeding and Enhancing Dairy Catte Health and Performance

Friday, May 31st, 2024

Discover how genomic inbreeding impacts livestock health and performance. Learn advanced methods to measure homozygosity and manage herds effectively. Curious? Read on.

Have you ever wondered why managing inbreeding is crucial for the health and performance of dairy cattle? The genetic makeup of these animals directly impacts their fitness, well-being, and productivity. Inbreeding, necessary for preserving desirable traits, can also lead to inbreeding depression, negatively affecting these factors. 

Understanding inbreeding is essential for protecting individual animals’ health and ensuring livestock production’s sustainability. High levels of homozygosity, where identical alleles come from both parents, can reveal hidden genetic flaws that otherwise stay unnoticed. 

“Inbreeding is double-edged; while it can amplify valuable traits, it often brings genetic weaknesses into the spotlight.”

Genomic information helps us better estimate and manage inbreeding. Advanced techniques using this data provide more accurate measures than traditional pedigree-based methods. One promising tool is the calculation of runs of homozygosity, offering a clearer picture of genetic makeup. 

This article explores traditional and modern measures of inbreeding, the effects of homozygosity on health and performance, and the latest advancements in genomic tools. By using this knowledge in breeding programs, we can balance genetic progress with sustained heterozygosity, improving the viability of dairy herds.

Pedigree-Based Inbreeding Coefficients: Tracking Lineage and Its Limitations

One traditional measure of inbreeding is using pedigree information to calculate inbreeding coefficients. This involves tracing an animal’s ancestry to find common ancestors and estimating the likelihood of inheriting identical alleles. While this method is popular because historical records are available, it has limitations. 

Firstly, pedigree-based coefficients depend on the accuracy of these records. Any errors or missing data can lead to incorrect estimates. They also assume equal allele transmission probability, ignoring factors like genetic drift and selection pressures. 

Additionally, these coefficients often miss recent inbreeding events, focusing on genetic identity over multiple generations. This can hinder real-time management of inbreeding levels in a herd. 

Another area for improvement is that pedigree-based methods only provide a probabilistic estimate, not a precise measure of actual homozygosity in the genome. This results in less accurate assessments of inbreeding’s effects on health and performance. 

In summary, while traditional pedigree-based inbreeding measures have their uses, they lack the precision needed for effective inbreeding management. This has led to the development of advanced genomic methods for a clearer, more accurate picture of inbreeding levels.

Advancements in Genomic Technologies have Revolutionized the Measurement of Inbreeding. 

Advancements in genomic technologies have revolutionized the measurement of inbreeding. One key innovation is the concept of runs of homozygosity (ROH). These are continuous stretches of identical DNA passed down from both parents, and they can be identified using high-density SNP panels such as the Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip. 

CharacteristicPedigree-Based InbreedingGenomic-Based Inbreeding
Data SourceLineage recordsSNP panels (e.g., Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip)
Measurement UnitInbreeding Coefficient (Fped)Genomic Inbreeding Coefficient (FROH)
AccuracyLess accurate due to reliance on historical recordsMore accurate due to direct assessment of genetic material
ResolutionLow; depends on the completeness and reliability of pedigree informationHigh; identifies specific genomic regions of homozygosity
ApplicabilityUseful for populations with extensive pedigree recordsApplicable regardless of the availability of pedigree information
Usage in ManagementCommon for traditional breeding programsIncreasingly important for modern genomic selection programs

Unlike traditional pedigree-based methods, which can be inaccurate, ROH offers a direct measure of a genome’s homozygosity. This provides a more precise estimate of autozygosity, giving a clearer picture of genetic inbreeding by examining the actual DNA. 

In a study of 68,127 dairy cows, ROH showed predictive solid power for identifying regions with high autozygosity. ROH proved a reliable indicator, as validated by Pearson correlations across SNP datasets. 

Integrating ROH into breeding programs can enhance mate selection and help avoid harmful homozygous regions. This approach maintains genetic diversity while improving livestock health and performance. In short, using ROH significantly advances understanding and managing inbreeding at the genomic level.

Unveiling the Impact of Homozygosity on Livestock Phenotypes: A Key to Health and Performance Management 

TraitCost of Inbreeding (%)
Milk Yield-2.5
Fertility-4.3
Longevity-3.6
Growth Rate-2.8
Health-3.1

Understanding the impact of homozygosity on phenotypes is essential for managing livestock health and performance. Inbreeding increases homozygosity, negatively affecting traits like health, fitness, and production levels. 

Health issues from inbreeding include more genetic disorders and disease susceptibility. This happens because harmful recessive alleles become more common in homozygous states. In dairy cows, inbreeding raises the frequency of stillbirths and hereditary conditions. 

Inbreeding also impacts the fitness of livestock. You might see declines in fertility, shorter lifespans, and reduced vigor. Studies link higher homozygosity to decreased reproductive success and lower calf survival rates. 

Inbreeding can significantly reduce milk yield, growth rates, and feed efficiency for production levels due to the loss of beneficial heterozygous genotypes. Research shows that as homozygosity increases, milk production often decreases. 

In short, the adverse effects of increased homozygosity due to inbreeding are widespread. They affect critical traits necessary for livestock viability and productivity. Strategically using genomic information can help mitigate these adverse effects and support sustainable breeding practices.

Inbreeding LevelCoefficient RangeImpact on HealthImpact on Performance
Low< 3%Minimal negative effectsOptimal productivity levels
Medium3% – 10%Increased susceptibility to diseasesModerate decline in production traits
High> 10%High risk of genetic disordersSignificant reduction in growth and output

Decoding Detrimental Haplotypes: Safeguarding Livestock Health and Performance 

Identifying detrimental homozygous haplotypes that negatively impact livestock health and performance requires precision. Researchers start by collecting extensive genotypic data from a large sample of animals, like the 68,127 dairy cows in this study, using high-density SNP panels such as the Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip. 

Next, imputation fills in missing genetic data, estimating ungenotyped SNPs to create a comprehensive dataset. For instance, cows genotyped with medium-density SNP panels were imputing a higher density of 84,445 SNPs, which enhanced the accuracy of genomic inbreeding coefficients. 

Scientists then identify runs of homozygosity (ROH), continuous stretches of homozygous genotypes, which suggest common ancestry. Sophisticated algorithms and Pearson correlations validate these ROHs. 

The identified ROH regions are cross-referenced with phenotypic data to spot any detrimental effects linked to specific haplotypes. Calculations of correlations and regression coefficients ensure robust results. 

Researchers can incorporate this knowledge into breeding programs by pinpointing detrimental haplotypes and selectively managing animals to reduce negative impacts on future generations.

Genomic Mate Selection: Precision Breeding for Genetic Health 

Implementing genomic information in mate selection and breeding programs has revolutionized inbreeding management. Traditional methods used pedigree-based inbreeding coefficients, which lacked precision. Now, with genomic data like runs of homozygosity (ROH), breeders make more accurate decisions. 

Genomic mate selection programs estimate genetic potential and inbreeding risks using genomic information. This helps identify optimal mating pairs, balancing genetic gain with diversity, and promoting healthier livestock. For instance, data from 68,127 dairy cows helps predict breeding outcomes more precisely, aiding better decisions. 

Imputation methods further improve data accuracy. Medium-density (MD) SNP panels can be imputed to higher SNP densities, validated with 329 cows, enhancing the accuracy of genomic inbreeding coefficients. This enables better mapping of homozygous regions and detecting detrimental haplotypes, improving breeding outcomes. 

Integrating genomic measures in breeding programs combines pedigree and genomic info, offering a comprehensive tool for better mate selection. Studies using Illumina Infinium BovineHD BeadChip and GeneSeek Genomic Profiler HD-150K show these approaches sustain genetic progress while minimizing inbreeding effects. 

Overall, genomic data in breeding programs shifts livestock management towards sustainability, minimizing inbreeding’s detrimental effects, resulting in healthier herds and better performance.

Precision Breeding: Balancing Genetic Progress and Diversity for a Sustainable Dairy Industry

You can maintain genetic progress while managing homozygosity and keeping heterozygosity at acceptable levels. With advanced genomic tools, breeders can select traits like milk production and disease resistance more accurately. By using genomic inbreeding measures, such as runs of homozygosity, breeding programs can minimize the harmful effects of inbreeding while preserving valuable genetic diversity. 

Genomic mate selection can optimize breeding decisions, balancing genetic merit and health. This precision breeding approach reduces the risk of inbreeding and boosts genetic progress. These advanced methods support the industry’s goals of improving productivity and animal welfare, fostering a sustainable, innovative dairy industry.

Harnessing Genomic Insights for Tailored Breeding Strategies: Maximizing Genetic Gains While Maintaining Diversity

One promising area in genomic inbreeding is achieving significant genetic progress. By integrating precise genomic measures, dairy farmers can enhance traits of interest and manage homozygosity more effectively. This ensures balanced heterozygosity, which is crucial for genetic diversity and herd health. Advanced tools allow for accurate identification of beneficial alleles, enabling selective breeding that boosts productivity while minimizing inbreeding impacts. Leveraging detailed genomic information offers a unique chance to tailor breeding strategies for sustained genetic improvement in dairy populations.

Exploring Future Directions: Enhancing Genomic Inbreeding Management Through Advanced Research 

While progress in managing genomic inbreeding has been substantial, many research areas still need exploring. Improving imputation accuracy and robustness in SNP data, as shown in studies with 329 cows, should be a priority. This could lead to better tools for predicting and managing inbreeding. 

Understanding how different SNP panel densities affect inbreeding estimates is also crucial. Correlation studies between FGRM and FROH with various SNP datasets can inform optimal panel designs. Further research into the effects of ancestral genotyping in different scenarios could provide valuable insights. 

Mapping detrimental homozygosity haplotypes remains critical. Technological advances could help identify these regions more precisely, allowing for targeted breeding strategies to mitigate their negative effects. 

Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in genomic prediction models could revolutionize precision breeding. Using large datasets, such as those of 68,127 dairy cows, these technologies can refine inbreeding depression predictions, improving mate selection and herd management. 

Interdisciplinary collaboration among geneticists, breeders, and data scientists is essential. Combining genetic insights with advanced computational methods will lead to new, practical tools for managing genomic inbreeding in livestock.

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, integrating genomic information into livestock breeding programs is essential. Traditional pedigree-based inbreeding coefficients, though important, have their limitations. Genomic technologies, such as runs of homozygosity, offer more accurate insights into autozygosity and its effects on health and performance. These tools allow breeders to manage genetic diversity better, identify harmful haplotypes, and make smarter mating decisions. This approach enhances animal fitness and productivity while supporting the dairy industry’s sustainability. Continued research to improve these genomic methods will lead to more robust and resilient livestock populations.

Key Takeaways:

  • Inbreeding Depreciation: Inbreeding negatively impacts animal fitness, health, and productivity, making it a pressing issue in livestock management.
  • Genomic Inbreeding Measures: Genomic information provides more precise estimates of inbreeding compared to traditional pedigree-based methods.
  • Runs of Homozygosity (ROH): Continuous stretches of homozygous genotypes provide a better estimate of autozygosity and genetic health at the genomic level.
  • Mate Selection Programs: Incorporating genomic information into breeding programs enhances the accuracy of mating decisions, reducing the negative effects of inbreeding.
  • Balancing Genetic Gains and Diversity: Using genomic insights can help maintain high genetic progress while managing homozygosity and sustaining heterozygosity.
  • Future Research Needs: Further research is essential to refine genomic inbreeding management methods and ensure sustainable livestock production.

Summary: Inbreeding is a critical factor in dairy cattle’s health and performance, affecting their fitness, well-being, and productivity. High levels of homozygosity can reveal hidden genetic flaws, affecting individual animals’ health and ensuring livestock production’s sustainability. Advancements in genomic technology have revolutionized inbreeding measurement, offering runs of homozygosity (ROH) as a direct measure of a genome’s homozygosity. Understanding the impact of homozygosity on phenotypes is crucial for managing livestock health and performance. Inbreeding increases homozygosity, negatively affecting traits like health, fitness, and production levels. Incorporating genomic information into breeding programs helps breeders make more accurate decisions, identifying optimal mating pairs, balancing genetic gain with diversity, and promoting healthier livestock. Precision breeding is essential for maintaining genetic progress while managing homozygosity and keeping heterozygosity at acceptable levels. Technological advances could help identify detrimental homozygosity haplotypes more precisely, allowing for targeted breeding strategies to mitigate their negative effects.

Categories : Mating Recommendations
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 10
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Overlays

Send this to a friend