calf nutrition

Slide 5: Slide 5
Style_Bullvine: Style_Bullvine
Slide 8: Slide 8
Slide 5: Slide 5
Slide 8: Slide 8
Slide 10: Slide 10

Archive for calf nutrition

The $40 Weaning Question: Why Some Farms Skip Binders and Get Better Results

Wednesday, October 8th, 2025

Is spending $10 on binders smarter than waiting 2 weeks to wean?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: What farmers are discovering about calf weaning might surprise you—the most successful operations aren’t necessarily the ones buying the most supplements. According to 2024 extension data, farms using gradual weaning protocols based on starter intake (2.75 pounds daily for three days) rather than calendar dates are seeing treatment costs drop by 20-30% while maintaining or improving growth rates. Dr. Michael Steele’s research at Guelph shows that managing ruminal pH during transition prevents the bacterial die-offs that release endotoxins in the first place, potentially eliminating the need for those $6-10 per calf binders many of us have accepted as necessary. Regional variations matter too—southern operations extending weaning during heat stress and northern farms using pair housing during winter are both finding better results by adapting to their specific conditions rather than following rigid protocols. Here’s what this means for your operation: whether you’re milking 50 cows or 5,000, the principle remains the same—healthy transitions based on biological readiness lead to healthier heifers and better lifetime production. The tools and knowledge are available through your extension service, and the potential returns make this worth examining carefully for any operation looking to improve both calf health and economics.

You know how weaning season always gets us thinking about what we’re spending versus what we’re getting? I’ve been talking with producers across the dairy belt lately, and here’s what’s interesting—we’re all looking at those endotoxin binder bills (running $6 to $10 per calf annually according to 2024-25 feed supplier pricing) and wondering if there might be a smarter approach to this whole transition period.

What I’ve found digging through extension publications and chatting with nutritionists is that we might be looking at this from angles we haven’t fully considered. Not that supplements don’t have their place—sometimes they’re exactly what we need—but maybe there are management pieces that could make a real difference.

What’s Actually Happening During Weaning

When we transition calves from milk to starter, most operations do this around 6-8 weeks, according to the USDA’s National Animal Health Monitoring System data—their digestive system essentially has to reinvent itself. The rumen begins producing volatile fatty acids as fermentation commences, and that’s where things can become complicated.

Dr. Michael Steele, Professor of Ruminant Nutrition at the University of Guelph, and his team have been studying this for years, publishing their findings in the Journal of Dairy Science. Their research shows how these bacterial population changes during weaning can really affect gut function. What happens is that the ruminal pH can drop significantly during this transition—sometimes to a level that causes substantial bacterial die-off.

And when those gram-negative bacteria die? They release endotoxins—technically called lipopolysaccharides—that can trigger inflammatory responses. That’s why the feed industry developed these binders we’re all familiar with. According to 2024 feed industry surveys, lots of operations have found them helpful, especially during challenging periods.

However, it’s worth noting that extension services and university research programs are increasingly interested in whether we can prevent some of these issues through effective management before they even develop.

Learning from Different Approaches

What I find fascinating is how different operations handle weaning, and they’re all getting results worth considering. Some individuals are extending milk feeding to 10-12 weeks instead of the traditional 6-8 weeks. Others are focusing on really gradual transitions—taking two or three weeks to reduce milk rather than doing it quickly.

Research from land-grant universities supports this idea that gradual transitions might help keep the rumen more stable during weaning. Makes sense when you think about it…we already do this everywhere else in dairy management. When we change rations for the milking herd, we take our time. Dry cow transitions are carefully managed. So why rush weaning?

I was talking with a dairy nutritionist from Iowa last month who put it perfectly: “We spend all this time balancing transition cow rations to the gram, then we expect baby calves to handle abrupt diet changes like it’s nothing.”

What’s encouraging is that there’s no single “right” answer here. Different operations face different realities—labor constraints, facility limitations, disease pressures—and what works needs to fit those circumstances.

The Money Side of Things

Weaning Economics: Traditional vs. Extended Approaches

Traditional Protocol (6-8 weeks):

Milk/replacer costs: Baseline standard
Endotoxin binders: $6-10 per calf annually (2024-25 pricing)
Treatment costs: $15-30 per affected calf (regional averages)
Typical treatment rate: 20-30% of calves

Extended Protocol (10-12 weeks):

Additional milk costs: $25-40 per calf (varies by region)
Binder use: Often reduced or eliminated
Treatment costs: Lower incidence reported
Labor: May vary depending on the system

Penn State Extension has been consistent in its recommendations, which can be found in their calf management bulletins, updated in 2024. They suggest waiting until calves are eating approximately 2.75 pounds of textured starter daily for three consecutive days before starting to cut milk. It’s about biological readiness, not what the calendar says.

Now, if you’re running a larger operation—say, 200-plus calves—you might be looking at those automated monitoring systems. Based on 2024 manufacturer quotes, the cost ranges from $85,000 to $110,000 installed for systems handling 150 or more calves. Some operations report they help with labor and catching health issues earlier, though results vary by management. For smaller farms? Careful observation and basic intake monitoring often work just as well. There’s definitely no one-size-fits-all solution here.

How Location Changes Everything

Climate makes a huge difference in how we approach this. Southern producers dealing with heat stress face completely different challenges than what we see up north. Texas A&M Extension recommends extending weaning timelines during those brutal summer months (when the temperature-humidity index exceeds 72) because calves handle the transition better when they’re not fighting heat stress as well.

Meanwhile, in Wisconsin and Minnesota, winter housing creates its own set of challenges. University of Minnesota research, published in 2024, suggests that different housing strategies—such as pair housing during cold months—might help reduce weaning stress behaviors by providing social support during the transition.

Out in California’s Central Valley, I’ve heard from extension dairy advisors about operations experimenting with three-stage weaning programs. They’re gradually shifting calves through different housing and feeding setups. It takes some logistics to figure out, but according to the 2024 regional dairy reports, several farms have seen their post-weaning treatment costs drop after implementing these systems.

Making Changes That Actually Work

Practical Weaning Readiness Checklist

✓ Starter Intake: Consistently eating 2.75+ pounds daily
✓ Rumination: Active cud chewing (3-5 hours daily by 8 weeks)
✓ Body Condition: Maintaining or gaining during milk reduction
✓ Behavior: Normal activity, minimal vocalization
✓ Growth: Meeting breed-appropriate weight gains

Here’s what I find really practical—you don’t need to revolutionize everything overnight. Start with better starter intake monitoring. Weighing refusals daily and keeping track can tell you a lot about when calves are actually ready to be weaned.

One thing that research from Cornell Pro-Dairy suggests helps is spacing out stressful events. If you’re vaccinating, consider waiting until after weaning. Their 2024 calf health guidelines indicate that separating these events by 10-14 days can improve how calves respond to both the vaccine and the weaning transition.

And staff training…that’s crucial. When your calf feeders understand why they’re doing something—not just following a protocol but actually getting the biology behind it—everything works better. Wisconsin Extension’s 2024 dairy workforce development data show that operations spending even just four hours training their calf feeders results in measurable improvements in protocol compliance.

Finding What Works for Your Farm

Looking at the broader picture, endotoxin binders aren’t the enemy. They serve real purposes, especially if you’re dealing with unavoidable management constraints or specific disease challenges. The American Association of Bovine Practitioners’ position papers acknowledge that both management-focused and supplement-supported approaches have merit depending on your situation.

Some operations combine strategies really successfully. They use gradual weaning as their standard practice, but keep binders on hand for high-stress periods—like those brutal summer months or when they’re training new staff. They track everything to see what’s actually working.

According to economic analyses from Iowa State Extension (2024), it is essential to consider the entire picture over several months, rather than just weaning costs. Operations that track total cost per pound of gain through approximately four months of age often make different decisions than those that only consider weaning expenses.

Where Things Are Heading

Extension services continue to develop better resources to help us figure this out. Most land-grant universities have updated their cattle management guidelines in the past two years, and there are webinars and decision-support tools available to help. You can find many of these through your state’s extension dairy website.

What’s particularly interesting is how nutritionists, veterinarians, and producers are collaborating more closely to develop farm-specific protocols. Instead of generic recommendations, we’re seeing more customization tailored to what individual farms can actually achieve. According to 2024 field reports from extension dairy specialists across the Midwest, this approach appears to be working better across the board.

Your calves are constantly communicating with you through their behavior. A calf that’s eating well, spending hours chewing cud, maintaining body condition during transition—that’s telling you your management is on track. Sometimes we just need to pay better attention to those signals.

Making Smart Decisions for Your Operation

Whether it’s October or any other time of year, it’s worth taking a hard look at your weaning protocols. Track what’s actually happening, not what you think is happening. Monitor starter intakes. Document how long transitions really take. Keep track of health events, particularly during weaning.

Most of us already have a fairly good sense of when calves are ready to be weaned. They’re aggressive at the starter bunk, they’re ruminating well, and they look vigorous and healthy. Sometimes we just need to trust those observations more than the calendar.

Where to Find More Information:

Your state’s extension dairy programs (most updated 2024-25)
Penn State Extension’s calf management resources
Cornell Pro-Dairy calf health publications
University of Wisconsin’s Dairyland Initiative
Regional dairy conferences and workshops

The economics will vary by operation—your milk costs, labor situation, and facilities all factor in. But the principle stays consistent: healthy transitions lead to healthy heifers. And healthy heifers become profitable cows.

Every calf you wean has the potential to become a high producer in two years. Getting this transition right now—whether through traditional methods, alternative approaches, or a combination of both—that’s an investment that pays dividends down the road. The research is available, the tools are accessible through extension services, and the potential returns make it worthwhile to take a careful look at what might work better for your specific operation.

After all, in this business, we’re always looking for that edge—that one percent improvement here, two percent there. Sometimes it’s not about adding something new. Sometimes it’s about doing what we’re already doing just a little bit smarter.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

Save $30-50 per calf by extending milk feeding 2-3 weeks while monitoring starter intake—the additional milk costs ($25-40) are offset by reduced treatment expenses and eliminated binder costs
Track biological readiness, not calendar dates: Wait for consistent 2.75-pound daily starter consumption, active rumination (3-5 hours daily), and maintained body condition before reducing milk
Adapt protocols to your region: Southern operations benefit from extending timelines during summer heat stress, while northern farms see improvements with pair housing during winter months
Space management stressors by 10-14 days: Separating vaccinations from weaning improves antibody response and reduces transition stress—a no-cost change that Cornell Pro-Dairy research shows makes a measurable difference
Both approaches have merit: Endotoxin binders serve valuable purposes during unavoidable management constraints—the smartest operations combine gradual weaning as standard practice with strategic supplement use during high-stress periods

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Revolutionizing Calf Rearing: 5 Game-Changing Nutrition Strategies That Deliver $4.20 ROI for Every Dollar Invested – This practical guide provides step-by-step methods for implementing stress-free weaning. It reveals how strategies like using nose flaps or fence-line weaning can reduce sickness by up to 22% while boosting daily gain and cutting post-weaning stress.
Maximizing Calf Performance: The Million-Dollar Investment in Your Dairy’s Future – This article connects pre-weaning growth to future profitability. It demonstrates how a 1 kg increase in average daily gain translates to 850 kg more milk in the first lactation, providing the economic rationale for investing in calf health and nutrition.
The $500000 Precision Dairy Gamble: Why Most Farms Are Being Sold a False Promise – This analysis provides a candid look at the ROI of expensive calf automation. It offers a realistic cost-benefit breakdown of automated feeding systems and sensors, helping you decide if the technology is right for your operation or if a more traditional approach is more profitable.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

Categories : Nutrition

Tags : calf nutrition, calf weaning, cost reduction, dairy profitability, farm efficiency, herd management

The Feed Tag Fine Print: 7 Nutrients That Actually Drive Calf Health

Wednesday, September 24th, 2025

Research shows 7 nutrients can cut calf treatment costs up to 20% when fed in bioavailable forms versus cheap alternatives

<a href="https://rss.com/podcasts/the-bullvine/2231014/">E374 The Feed Tag Fine Print: 7 Nutrients That Act | RSS.com</a>

Hey folks! Ever stood in the feed store staring at two calf starters with identical 18% protein on the bag, wondering why one keeps your calves thriving while the other has you calling the vet? I’ve been there, scratching my head over why some calves just don’t take off right. Here’s what I’ve learned: the real story’s hiding in the fine print.

Red Flags That Cost Real Money

Weeks 2-4 are when $400 in vet bills get made or saved. This immunity gap is why timing your nutrition strategy matters more than your neighbors realize—and why smart producers are investing in targeted supplementation during this critical window.

Before we dive into solutions, let’s talk about what you might already be seeing in your own herd. Watch your records for these warning signs:

More than 15% of calves are getting scours treatments (according to USDA NAHMS data)
Pneumonia clusters, especially in vaccinated groups
Post-weaning growth drops right after transition.
Dull, rough-coated calves that look “off” without obvious illness.
Slow recovery from illness, even with proper treatment

If any of these sound familiar, you could be facing hidden nutritional gaps that are draining your time and profits. A sick calf costs real money—not just vet bills but lost growth potential that never comes back.

Every Region Has Its Mineral Curveballs

Here’s the thing—soil and water conditions vary drastically from region to region, and these differences can make or break your calf nutrition program. Some areas battle selenium-poor soils, others deal with iron-rich dirt that contaminates silage during harvest. Then you’ve got sulfur showing up in well water, or molybdenum in forages that ties up the copper your calves desperately need.

One producer I know put it perfectly: “I used to wonder why my neighbor’s calves always looked healthier. Turns out it wasn’t about protein—it was about getting minerals that could actually work with our local soil and water conditions.”

Those pale rings around a calf’s eyes that make them look like they’re wearing glasses? This can be related to a copper deficiency, which is far more common than most of us realize, as copper deficiency is a widespread problem in many areas of the United States and Canada (NASEM, 2016).

The Seven Game-Changers That Actually Matter

The absorption gap is staggering—organic selenium delivers 3x better uptake than cheap alternatives. When treatment costs average $85 per sick calf, spending an extra $30 on bioavailable minerals becomes the smartest investment you’ll make this year.

Forget chasing protein numbers alone. Research from Penn State, the University of Wisconsin, and extension services nationwide shows these seven nutrients make the real difference between calves that thrive and those that just survive:

Vitamin E: Your Antioxidant Shield

This is your calf’s protection against oxidative stress, especially during periods of stress, such as cold weather or transport. Research shows calves need 220-440 IU per kg of starter feed for real immune benefits—way above basic requirements.

Here’s the catch: Look for natural vitamin E (d-alpha-tocopherol), not the synthetic, cheaper version. Your calf’s body literally can’t use most of the synthetic forms.

Selenium: The Missing Piece

Many regions have selenium-poor soils, so you want feeds hitting the legal 0.3 ppm limit using a reliable source of selenium. Beware the cheap alternative: Inorganic selenium, such as sodium selenite, doesn’t build tissue stores and is instead flushed out. Organic selenium builds reserves that get mobilized during stress—that’s the difference between calves that crash and those that power through challenges.

Zinc: Your Gut Guardian

Strong gut integrity means fewer pathogens getting through. The new NASEM suggests using 75-100 ppm of zinc for stressed calves. Prefer to use more available sources, such as chelated or hydroxy minerals. Red flag alert: Avoid feeds listing zinc oxide—it’s cheap and poorly absorbed. Producers who switch to more bioavailable zinc sources often report improvement on animal performance.

Copper: Easy to Lose, Expensive to Replace

If your water runs high in sulfur or your forages contain high levels of molybdenum, you’re fighting an uphill battle. You need 10-15 ppm copper from chelated or hydroxy copper to overcome the antagonistic effects of these high sulfur/molybdenum minerals. Major warning: Copper oxide is essentially biologically unavailable and worthless—its presence on a feed tag is a major red flag.

Manganese: The Quiet Builder

Critical for bone development in growing heifers. Target 40 ppm from organic or hydroxy sources, especially since iron contamination in feeds can block uptake. High iron levels compete directly with manganese for absorption sites, so bioavailable organic/hydroxy forms help overcome this interference.

Glutamine: The Stress-Buster

This amino acid fuels gut lining cells during transport or weaning stress. Around 1-2% of dry matter intake as rumen-protected glutamine helps calves cope. Form matters: Free glutamine gets degraded in the rumen, so it must be rumen-protected to reach the small intestine where it’s needed.

Arginine: The Circulation Enhancer

Helps immune cells reach infection sites through better blood flow. Supplement at 0.25-0.5% dry matter with rumen-protected forms. Like glutamine, it needs protection from rumen microbes to be effective.

Your Feed Tag Cheat Sheet

What to Look For:

Protein: 18-22% is fine, but don’t obsess
Vitamin E: 220+ IU/kg from natural sources
Trace Minerals: Hydroxy or chelated minerals —avoid “oxide”
Gut Health Boosters: Probiotics, yeast culture, prebiotics.

Questions That Matter:

“Which specific forms of trace minerals do you use?”
“How do you account for regional mineral antagonists?”
“What’s your pellet durability score?”
“Got any performance data from farms in my area?”

Premium minerals cost $30 more per calf but save $140 in total expenses—that’s a 467% ROI that compounds across your entire calf crop. The math isn’t even close when you factor in treatment costs and lost growth potential.

The Bottom Line: Your Wallet Will Thank You

University extension analyses suggest significant returns from proper mineral supplementation, with benefits varying by operation and local conditions14.

Real example: One producer switched to a starter with organic minerals and higher vitamin E. Two years later, he reported his healthiest heifer crop yet—fewer vet calls and better weaning weights.

Impact Area	Improvement with Organic Minerals	Economic Value (per calf)	Research Source
Treatment Cost Reduction	20% reduction in scours treatments	$25-40 saved	Multiple university studies
Improved Pregnancy Rates	3-5% increase in conception rates	$150-250 value	Cargill, NAHMS data
Weaning Weight Gains	15-25 lbs additional weaning weight	$30-50 additional revenue	Multiple feeding trials
Reduced Mortality	2-3% reduction in calf mortality	$400-600 loss prevention	USDA mortality statistics
Feed Efficiency	5-8% improvement in FCR	$20-35 feed savings	Feed conversion studies
Mineral Supplement Cost	$0.15/day per calf additional cost	$11 annual cost increase	Commercial pricing
Net Economic Benefit	$75-150 per calf net return	$75-150 net profit	Combined analysis

Your Action Plan

This Week:

Pull your treatment records and look for patterns.
Check your current feed tags for mineral sources.
Call your nutritionist with the questions above.

This Month:

4. Test your water and soil for problematic minerals

5. Track starter intake and growth rates closely

6. Consider upgrading to feeds with proven hydroxy or chelated mineral packages

7. Track Results: Monitor intake, average daily gain, treatment rates, and weaning transitions. The numbers will tell the story.

The Hard Truth

No matter where you farm, calves face stress from weaning, weather changes, and the challenges of modern dairy production. Give them the nutritional tools they need—in forms they can actually use—and your bottom line will show the difference.

Don’t let hidden deficiencies steal your profits. Those seven nutrients, properly sourced and formulated for your local conditions, aren’t just nice-to-haves—they’re your competitive edge.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

Bioavailability beats quantity: Organic forms of zinc (proteinate), selenium (yeast), and copper (amino acid complex) deliver 15-30% better absorption than cheaper sulfate or oxide forms, especially when antagonists like iron or sulfur are present in local water or forages.
Regional customization pays: Producers in high-sulfur water areas or iron-rich soil regions who switch to organic copper sources often see 20% reductions in scours treatments, as organic minerals bypass common antagonistic interactions that block absorption.
Target the immunity gap strategically: Calves face peak vulnerability between 2-3 weeks of age when maternal antibodies decline, but active immunity isn’t fully developed—optimal levels of vitamin E (220-440 IU/kg) and selenium (0.3 ppm from yeast) during this period strengthen immune response and vaccination effectiveness.
Form matters more than inclusion rates: Natural vitamin E shows 2-3x greater bioactivity than synthetic forms due to the body’s preferential transport proteins, making it worth the premium cost for operations focused on reducing treatment costs and improving weaning success rates.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

What farmers are discovering is that traditional calf nutrition strategies, which focus on meeting minimum requirements, are leaving money on the table during the most critical growth period. Recent research from leading agricultural universities identifies seven nutrients—vitamin E, selenium, zinc, organic copper, manganese, glutamine, and arginine—that, when delivered in bioavailable forms, can significantly reduce treatment costs and improve weaning performance. The key finding revolves around bioavailability: organic, chelated forms of these nutrients consistently outperform cheaper inorganic alternatives by 15-30% in absorption rates, particularly when dietary antagonists like iron, sulfur, or molybdenum are present. Studies demonstrate that calves receiving optimal levels of these nutrients in bioavailable forms show 20% fewer scours treatments and smoother weaning transitions with less post-weaning growth slumps. Here’s what this means for your operation: by investing in scientifically formulated starters that prioritize nutrient form over just inclusion rates, producers can bridge the critical “immunity gap” between maternal protection and active immunity development. The future of calf nutrition lies in understanding the complex nutrient interactions and antagonisms that vary by region, creating opportunities for producers to tailor their approach to local soil and water conditions.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Revolutionizing Calf Rearing: 5 Game-Changing Nutrition Strategies That Deliver $4.20 ROI for Every Dollar Invested – This tactical article reveals how to prevent scours and improve post-weaning performance through practical strategies like extended colostrum feeding, strategic hay introduction, and probiotics, helping producers achieve a significant return on investment.
Deconstructing the June Milk Surge: The Management Playbook Your Competitors are Using Now – This piece provides a strategic overview of how savvy producers are leveraging dropping feed costs and market shifts to boost profitability. It offers insights into how you can manage risk and optimize your entire operation to improve your bottom line.
Beyond Genomics: Is Gene Editing the Next Great Leap for Dairy Cattle? – This article explores the innovative frontier of dairy genetics, including gene editing. It demystifies the technology and reveals how it could accelerate genetic progress and improve animal health, offering a forward-looking perspective on herd management.

Join the Revolution!

Categories : Nutrition

Tags : Calf Health, calf nutrition, calf starter feed, dairy profitability, farm efficiency, herd management

Ditch the Dogma: The Hidden Truths in the Latest May 2025 Journal of Dairy Science Animal Nutrition Research That Could Explode Your Bottom Line

Tuesday, May 20th, 2025

Explosive new research shatters dairy nutrition myths. Your feed program’s bleeding cash—here’s the science to stop it.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This no-nonsense breakdown of cutting-edge dairy nutritional science reveals how outdated practices are costing farmers profits. Key findings show traditional feed efficiency metrics (RFI) may be flawed, MUN numbers alone mislead protein strategies, and calf nutrition programs are sabotaging future milk yields. Canola meal outperforms models, methane-reducing additives trade production for sustainability, and early harvest dogma sacrifices tonnage.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

Feed efficiency isn’t what you measure: Blood biomarkers (ruminal ammonia, fatty acids) could replace clunky RFI metrics.
MUN lies without context: NFC:CP ratios—not crude protein—dictate nitrogen efficiency.
Calves are lifetime investments: Every dollar in preweaning nutrition returns $2+ in first-lactation milk.
Canola meal defies models: Undervalued small particles boost metabolizable protein.
Methane cuts cost milk: Bovaer reduces emissions but risks production—balance green goals with profitability.

dairy nutrition, feed efficiency, calf nutrition, dairy science research, protein utilization

Are you sick and tired of wading through jargon-filled academic papers, trying to decipher what any of it means for your actual, dirt-under-the-fingernails dairy operation? While university researchers pat themselves on the back for their latest “discoveries,” you’re out there in the real world, trying to make a living. The truth is, the newest batch of animal nutrition research from the Journal of Dairy Science is packed with bombshells that could revolutionize your entire feeding strategy—if you’ve got the guts to look past the polite scientific language and see what they’re really saying.

Forget the incremental improvements. We’re talking about a fundamental shift in how you should be thinking about feeding your herd. In this no-holds-barred exposé, we’re ripping away the scientific veneer to lay bare the practical, profitable, and sometimes uncomfortable truths. From debunking sacred cows (pun intended) of feed efficiency to exposing the lifelong financial fallout of skimping on calf nutrition, we’re putting these findings into a language every dairyman understands: profit and loss. Prepare for some hard truths and game-changing revelations.

FEED EFFICIENCY: THOSE FANCY RFI METRICS? MAYBE NOT SO FANCY AFTER ALL.

What if everything you thought you knew about picking feed-efficient cows is just plain wrong?

For years, we’ve chased the holy grail: cows that pump out milk like a firehose while sipping feed like it’s a fine wine. The term Residual Feed Intake (RFI) has been thrown around by genetic companies and consultants like it’s gospel. But hold onto your hats, because new research (Associations of serum fatty acids, serum urea nitrogen, and ruminal ammonia nitrogen with residual feed intake in lactating dairy cows) is kicking that conventional wisdom to the curb.

Scientists dug into the biochemistry and found something that’ll make your head spin: the most feed-efficient cows? They actually had higher ruminal ammonia nitrogen. Yeah, you read that right. They also showed distinct patterns in blood fats, like more myristic and palmitic acids, and less of the polyunsaturated stuff.

Why This Should Jolt You Awake:

Imagine pinpointing your most profitable animals with a simple blood test. Forget expensive, clunky intake measurement systems. These biomarkers, if they hold up, could flip your heifer selection and culling strategy on its head. Are you still making six-figure genetic bets based on yesterday’s science?

“We’ve been so focused on the ‘how much in, how much out’ that we’ve missed the ‘what’s actually happening inside’ picture,” admits Dr. James Robertson, a no-nonsense nutritionist (not tied to this study). “These Penn State findings are a wake-up call: the cow’s internal chemistry might be the real key to efficiency.”

The Million-Dollar Question They’re Not Asking Loud Enough: Are your breeding decisions, the ones shaping your herd for the next decade, still clinging to outdated efficiency metrics? If these biomarkers pan out, the entire genetic selection game is about to be rewritten.

THE NITROGEN NIGHTMARE: MUN ISN’T THE MAGIC BULLET YOU THINK IT IS

For donkey’s years, Milk Urea Nitrogen (MUN) has been the dairyman’s dipstick for protein nutrition. You’ve probably tweaked rations, spent a fortune on protein supplements, and sweated over those DHIA numbers. But guess what? A massive meta-analysis (Assessing milk urea nitrogen as an indicator of protein nutrition and nitrogen utilization efficiency: A meta-analysis) pooling 48 studies just dropped a bomb: MUN, on its own, is a dangerously incomplete story.

The link between MUN and what you’re actually feeding is all tangled up with the ratio of nonfiber carbohydrates (NFC) to crude protein (CP). This isn’t just academic hair-splitting; it’s about your feed bill and the environment. The study nails it: high MUN means more nitrogen (and your money) going down the drain as urine, and worse nitrogen use efficiency.

Here’s the Gut Punch:

Stop obsessing over crude protein percentages! The NFC:CP ratio is looking like a far better crystal ball for nitrogen utilization. How many farms are overfeeding expensive protein, polluting more, and still thinking their “acceptable” MUN means they’re doing a great job? It’s like trying to fine-tune a high-performance engine with a rusty wrench.

“Looking at MUN in a vacuum is like trying to drive by only looking in the rearview mirror,” quips independent nutritionist Sarah Franks. “This research screams that we need to be balancing carbs and protein in tandem to actually get a grip on efficiency.”

The Provocative Question: How many thousands of dollars are you literally flushing away by chasing MUN numbers instead of strategically balancing the NFC:CP ratio in your TMR? Are you feeding for numbers, or for profit?

CALF NUTRITION: THE CRADLE-TO-GRAVE PROFIT LEAK (OR GOLDMINE)

Listen up: the decisions you make in the calf barn today are writing cheques (or IOUs) for your milking herd years down the line. Are you setting them up for championship performance or a lifetime of ‘meh’?

The science is no longer whispering; it’s shouting. What you pour into those calf pails today directly dictates their future in the milking string. A landmark meta-analysis (Effects of preweaning calf daily gain and feed intake on first-lactation performance: A meta-analysis) has crunched the numbers: higher average daily gain (ADG) before weaning means significantly more milk, fat, and protein in that critical first lactation.

Sure, liquid feed intake (LDMI) matters, but the old dogma about aggressively pushing starter feed (SDMI)? The data says it’s not the silver bullet we thought. This directly challenges the “get ’em on grain ASAP” mentality that many old-timers (and some not-so-old-timers) still cling to.

The Cold, Hard Cash Reality:

Let’s talk money. If an extra $50 or $100 in top-shelf milk or replacer per calf translates to an extra 1,000 pounds of milk in her first lactation, what are you waiting for? At $20/cwt, that’s a $200 ROI. You’d jump at that return on a piece of equipment; why not on your future herd?

“Calf nutrition isn’t just about hitting weaning weights,” warns calf guru Dr. Emily Chen. “It’s about programming that animal’s entire productive machinery for life. Skimp now, pay forever.”

But wait, there’s more. Another bombshell study (Effects of milk feeding levels and starter feed crude protein and fat contents on growth performance, rumen fermentation, and purine derivative excretion in urine of dairy calves) found that while high milk plus high-protein starter is a winning combo, jamming high-fat starter into calves, especially those on generous milk diets, actually cripples intake, growth, and healthy rumen development. Think about that next time you’re tempted by that “high-energy” (read: high-fat) starter.

The Unpalatable Truth: That “thrifty” approach to raising calves? It’s likely a massive profit leak, costing you a fortune in lost milk, lactation after lactation. Are you still penny-pinching on calves while expecting champagne performance from your cows? That’s like putting cheap gas in a Ferrari and wondering why it sputters.

PROTEIN WARS: WHY CANOLA MEAL IS SCHOOLING THE SOYBEAN STALWARTS (AND THE MODELS)

For years, nutritionists have scratched their heads. Models like the NRC system kept predicting canola meal would underperform soybean meal in metabolizable protein. Yet, out in the real world, canola often had cows milking better. What gives? Groundbreaking research from the University of Wisconsin, using 15N-labeled meals (Effects of canola meal or soybean meal on duodenal flow of nitrogen fractions in dairy cows), has finally blown the lid off this mystery.

By meticulously tracking nitrogen through the cow, they found something stunning: way more nitrogen from tiny canola particles and rumen bugs (both attached and free-floating) was making it to the duodenum with canola meal versus soybean meal.

Here’s the Mind-Bender:

Those small canola particles, which the models assumed were obliterated in the rumen? They’re actually surviving the rumen onslaught and delivering a direct protein punch to the cow. This fundamentally torpedoes how we’ve been judging protein sources for decades!

“This is the ‘Aha!’ moment we’ve been waiting for,” explains dairy nutritionist Dr. Wilson. “It explains why canola often punches above its weight in the tank. We’ve been systematically short-changing its true protein value.”

The Challenge to Your Feed Bill:

If the almighty models have been this wrong about canola, what else are they getting wrong? And it gets worse. Another meta-analysis (Net portal appearance used to assess feed evaluation system predictions of the digestive flow and gut metabolism of essential amino acids in dairy cows: A meta-analysis) put three major feed evaluation systems (NRC, NASEM, and CNCPS) under the microscope, comparing their predictions of essential amino acid flow. The result? Significant, glaring discrepancies for several key amino acids.

The Question That Should Keep You Up at Night: Is your nutritionist still blindly trusting these potentially flawed models to build your rations? Are you leaving milk in the cow (and money on the table) because your feed program is based on outdated assumptions? It’s 2025, folks. Relying solely on old models is like navigating with a sextant when GPS exists.

THE METHANE MESS: THAT FANCY ADDITIVE WORKS… A LITTLE TOO WELL?

The green police are breathing down agriculture’s neck, and methane’s public enemy number one. Enter Bovaer (3-nitrooxypropanol or 3-NOP), a feed additive waving some impressive methane-reduction flags. Indeed, recent research (Effect of Bovaer inclusion in diets with a high proportion of grass-clover silage of different nutritional quality on gas emissions and production performance in dairy cows) showed that adding it to diets heavy on grass-clover silage slashed methane by a hefty 30%, no matter the silage quality.

But (And It’s a BIG But):

This green victory came at a cost. Cows on Bovaer ate less and milked less, and the hit was worse for fresh cows. So, here’s the billion-dollar question: how do you balance a cleaner conscience with a fatter wallet?

“The dairy industry is caught between a rock and a hard place,” observes sustainability expert Jennifer Hayes. “Cutting methane is non-negotiable for our future license to operate, but we can’t go broke doing it. Solutions can’t cripple productivity when margins are already tighter than a banjo string.”

The Questions Your Co-op Isn’t Asking (But Should Be):

What’s an acceptable loss in production for a greener footprint? Who decides?
Are consumers really willing to pony up more for “low-methane milk,” or is that just a feel-good fantasy?
How long before the regulators stop asking nicely and start mandating this stuff, regardless of the hit to your milk cheque?

The Provocative Reality: The smartest operators are already viewing methane mitigation not as a choice, but an inevitability. Those who figure out how to adapt now, without tanking their production, will be miles ahead when the mandates come knocking. Will you be a leader or a laggard?

FORAGE FUNDAMENTALS: IS YOUR “PERFECT” HARVEST TIMING ACTUALLY COSTING YOU?

When it comes to small-grain silages like triticale or ryegrass, the age-old wisdom is “cut it at boot stage for quality, quality, quality!” But hold your horses. New research (Effect of maturity at harvest of small-grain grasses on the nutritional composition of forage and ration formulation) comparing boot stage (BT) versus soft dough stage (SFT) harvesting paints a far more complicated, and frankly, more interesting picture.

Sure, cutting at soft dough dramatically bumps up your tonnage. But, as expected, protein and energy drop, while fiber and lignin climb. Here’s where it gets juicy: when the researchers plugged these different forages into a least-cost ration model, factoring in fluctuating commodity prices, neither harvest stage was the clear winner across the board.

The Paradigm Demolition:

Stop the tunnel vision on forage quality uber alles! This research screams for a whole-system economic approach. What are corn and soybean meal prices doing? How much other forage do you have in the bunker? Sometimes, that higher yield of slightly “lower quality” (but still perfectly good) forage actually pencils out better in the final TMR.

“It’s like how we now view corn silage hybrids,” notes forage guru Dr. Amanda Berger. “Sometimes more tons of decent stuff beats fewer tons of perfect stuff, especially when grain prices are through the roof.”

The Brutal Truth: Your unwavering devotion to that early, “super-quality” harvest window? It might be sacrificing valuable tonnage without actually delivering the economic knockout punch you expect in today’s volatile feed markets. Are you managing for lab numbers or for farm profitability?

THE BUFFER BLUNDER: WHEN “FIXING” HINDGUT ACIDOSIS CREATES NEW HEADACHES

High-starch diets. We love the milk, but we hate the acidosis, right? And when that acid spills over from the rumen into the hindgut, it’s a whole other mess. So, logically, some bright sparks suggested hindgut buffers. Makes sense, right? Not so fast. Recent research (Evaluation of hindgut buffers under high-starch diet conditions in lactating Holstein cows) threw a wrench in those plans.

They pumped starch directly into cows’ intestines to mimic hindgut acidosis and then tried different buffers. Sure, the buffers raised fecal pH (less acid, yay!). But here’s the kicker: they also jacked up hindgut fermentation markers like VFAs and purines. Even worse, one high buffer dose actually seemed to trigger inflammation and slash feed intake. So much for a simple fix.

The Reality Slap:

Sometimes, our “solutions” are just trading one problem for another, possibly worse, one. This study strongly suggests that trying to mop up hindgut acidosis with buffers might be a fool’s errand, potentially creating more fires than it puts out.

“We’re getting dangerously good at treating symptoms instead of fixing root causes,” warns ruminant physiologist Dr. Marcus Paulson. “Maybe, just maybe, the smarter play is to manage starch digestion before it becomes a hindgut disaster, rather than playing whack-a-mole with buffers downstream.”

The Rhetorical Zinger: How many additives in your feed bunk are playing this dangerous game – solving one issue on paper while silently creating two more you haven’t even thought to measure? Is your TMR a finely tuned ration or a science experiment gone sideways?

AMINO ACID AWAKENING: THE RUMEN ISN’T AS DUMB AS WE THOUGHT

The old-school thinking on feeding individual amino acids (AAs) was pretty simple: don’t bother. They’ll just get chewed up and spat out by the rumen bugs, a total waste of money. Well, new in vitro work (In vitro assessment of the effect of free amino acids on ruminal fermentation and ¹⁵N enrichment of ruminal nitrogen pools) is here to tell you: the rumen has a more sophisticated palate than we gave it credit for.

Turns out, certain AAs, especially the branched-chain ones, actually supercharge the rumen microbes’ ability to convert ammonia-nitrogen into bacterial protein. They’re improving nitrogen use within the rumen. And while slinging in single AAs didn’t overhaul total fermentation, some branched-chain AAs specifically boosted their corresponding VFAs, hinting that they can steer fermentation pathways.

The “So What?” For Your Farm:

This cracks open the door to a whole new level of precision feeding: strategically nourishing the rumen microbiome itself. The goal? Squeeze more out of your nitrogen, potentially cut back on total protein, and fine-tune rumen function.

“We’ve known for ages that amino acid balance after the rumen is critical,” notes rumen microbiologist Dr. Elena Rodriguez. “Now, we’re seeing they can be puppet masters inside the rumen too. This could be huge for formulating smarter, more efficient rations.”

The Forward-Thinking Dare: Could the next leap in dairy nutrition be feeding specific amino acids not just to meet the cow’s needs, but to deliberately sculpt the rumen environment? Are you ready to move beyond just “filling the tank” to actively conducting the rumen orchestra?

THE LONG SHADOW OF THE MILK PAIL: EARLY NUTRITION’S LIFELONG METABOLIC ECHO

Let’s talk about heifers, and not just getting them bred on time. New research (Effects of preweaning milk allowance on long-term metabolism in Holstein heifers) dug into how that preweaning milk allowance echoes through their entire lives, metabolically speaking.

Sure, more milk early on meant faster growth initially. But the real bombshells were found at 11 months old, long after weaning. Heifers on the high-milk plan showed signs of better insulin sensitivity and ramped-up fatty acid metabolism. These aren’t just fleeting changes; this is evidence that early nutrition is basically programming their long-term metabolic machinery.

The Paradigm Implosion:

This isn’t just about hitting target growth rates or calving age anymore. This is about metabolic programming. What you do in those first few months could be setting the stage for that heifer’s lifetime health, fertility, and how well she handles the metabolic tightrope walk of transition and high production.

“We’re peeling back the layers on how early-life nutrition leaves an indelible metabolic fingerprint,” explains developmental biologist Dr. Hassan. “The shockwaves for transition cow success and lifetime productivity could be absolutely massive. Think of it like building a skyscraper – the foundation you lay in those first few months determines the integrity of the entire structure for decades.”

The Provocative Punchline: Your most powerful tool for a killer transition cow program? It might not be in the close-up pen; it might be in the calf hutch. Are you still treating calf rearing as a cost center instead of the ultimate investment in your herd’s future?

THE BOTTOM LINE

This isn’t just another round of minor tweaks from the ivory tower. The latest science from the Journal of Dairy Science is lobbing grenades at some of our most deeply entrenched feeding dogmas. From trashing old feed efficiency metrics to proving early nutrition is a lifelong metabolic game-changer, these findings aren’t just suggestions; they are a full-blown challenge to business as usual.

Who will thrive in the next decade? Not the dairyman stuck in tradition. Not even the one diligently following today’s “best practices.” It will be the disruptors, the critical thinkers, the ones who dare to question, to test, and to adapt their feed bunks based on hard science, not just habit or what the last salesman said.

It’s Time for a brutally honest self-assessment. Ask yourself:

Is my nutritionist still leaning on protein evaluation models that this new research suggests are fundamentally flawed?
Have I ever really calculated the lifetime ROI of a truly aggressive, science-backed calf nutrition program, or am I still just trying to get them weaned cheap?
Am I chasing MUN numbers like a dog chasing its tail, instead of focusing on the real drivers of nitrogen efficiency?
Am I prepared to make tough calls on methane mitigation that balance green credentials with black ink on the balance sheet?
Is “we’ve always done it this way” still the most common phrase heard in my feed meetings?

The dairy industry is staring down the barrel of unprecedented pressures: environmental crusades, fickle consumers, and markets that turn on a dime. But where there’s chaos, there’s opportunity—for those with the guts to seize it.

The nutrition revolution isn’t on the horizon; it’s kicking down your barn door. The only question left is: will you be leading the charge, or will you be eating the dust of competitors who saw the writing on the wall?

The Final, Uncomfortable Truth: In the high-stakes game of dairy nutrition, ignorance isn’t bliss; it’s bankruptcy. But what you think you know, based on outdated science or industry inertia, might be even more dangerous. Stop feeding your cows based on yesterday’s news. The future of your dairy depends on it.

This article summarizes and interprets recent research from the Journal of Dairy Science for practical application. However, every dairy is unique. Always consult with your qualified nutritionist and veterinarian before making significant changes to your herd’s feeding or management programs.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Categories : Journal of Dairy Science

Tags : calf nutrition, Dairy Nutrition, dairy science research, Feed Efficiency, protein utilization

The $4,250 Springer: Why Your Calf Nutrition Program Might Be Leaving Money on The Table

Monday, May 12th, 2025

With Holstein springers fetching $4,250, are you sacrificing $1,000 in future value to save $20 on feed costs? Your calves aren’t just livestock—they’re assets.

<a href="https://rss.com/podcasts/the-bullvine/2024499/">E258 The $4,250 Springer: Why Your Calf Nutrition | RSS.com</a>

Hey, have you seen those Holstein Springer prices lately? I nearly spilled my drink when I heard they hit $4,250. It’s not just some random spike; this is our new reality. Heifer inventories are tight as a drum in 2025, and those of us who’ve been treating our replacement programs like just another cost center are about to get a wake-up call.

I’ve been talking with some of the most forward-thinking dairy folks across Minnesota and California, and this revolutionary concept is changing how they view heifer development. They’re calling it “nutritional cash flow management.” Sounds like consultant-speak, right? But stick with me on this one—it’s brilliant when you break it down.

LET’S TALK CALF ECONOMICS (WITHOUT THE BORING PARTS)

Tana Dennis over at Cargill nailed it when she said, “We can think of each calf as its own business.” I love that framing! It originally came from Dr. Johan Osorio’s work on transition cows, but it works perfectly for calves, too.

Think about it—your business needs steady cash flow to pay bills, grow, and stay afloat. Well, your calves are no different. They need consistent energy streams, amino acids, and antioxidants to power everything they’re doing. It’s not just theoretical science—it shows up in your bottom line.

Ever wonder if you’re being penny-wise and pound-foolish with your feeding program? Are you saving $20 on feed costs today only to give up $1,000 in value down the road? Honestly, I’ve seen it happen more times than I can count.

ENERGY: THE STUFF THAT MAKES THE MAGIC HAPPEN

I like to think of energy as the fundamental currency in a calf’s world. When they don’t get enough—maybe they’re stressed, sick, or your feeding program isn’t cutting it—they experience a revenue collapse. They’ve got to dip into those limited fat reserves, like burning through your savings to keep the lights on.

Here’s the kicker—unlike your mature cows, which can carry some extra condition, your replacement heifers don’t have that luxury, especially in those first four months. Nutritionally speaking, they’re living paycheck to paycheck!

Check out how their “nutritional cash flow” needs to ramp up as they grow:

Table: Monthly Feed Requirements – The Growing Appetite

Age of calf (months)	Daily consumption (kg)	Monthly consumption (kg)
1-2	0.25	7.5
2-3	0.7	20
3-4	1.1	33
4-5	1.6	48
5-6	2.3	70
6-7	3.2	96

Source: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Isn’t that progression wild? They start needing just 7.5 kg monthly and demand nearly 100 kg! If you’re still feeding the same way in month 6 that you did in month 2, you’re setting yourself up for trouble.

THE GREAT DIVIDE: INVESTORS VS. PENNY-PINCHERS

I swear the dairy industry is splitting into two camps these days. You’ve got folks who see nutrition as another expense to slash during budget meetings. Then you’ve got the forward-thinkers who view it as an investment with measurable returns.

Want to see something that’ll make your accountant’s head spin? Look at this ROI calculation:

Item	Details
Extra cost for premium antioxidants	+$32/calf
Money saved on treatments	-$45/calf
Growth improvement	15% faster growth
Extra value at market time	+$375-625
Your actual return	1,070-1,850%

Show me another investment on your farm with that kind of return! You can’t, can you?

This mindset difference shows up when you examine how different operations handle antioxidant supplementation. The brightest producers I know build an “antioxidant portfolio” like your retirement account but for your calves’ health.

Here’s something else that might surprise you. The more challenging your conditions, the HIGHER your return on nutritional investments:

Table: Feed Conversion Returns by Conditions

Feeding Environment	Feed Conversion Efficiency (kg feed : kg extra gain)	What This Means For Your Farm
Excellent pasture quality, above-average milk production	14-17:1	Lowest return – like investing in a saturated market
Average pasture quality, average milk production	8-10:1	Moderate return – standard market conditions
Poor pasture quality, below-average milk production	4.5-6:1	Highest return – like finding an undervalued stock

Source: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Crazy, right? When conditions are harsh, premium nutrition pays off the most! It’s completely counter to how most of us think about feed costs.

I talked with my neighbor last week and told him, “Your calves aren’t just livestock—they’re walking financial securities.” He laughed, but then he ran the numbers on his operation. He’s not laughing anymore—he’s expanding his heifer program!

BUILDING YOUR CALF’S ANTIOXIDANT PORTFOLIO

So, what does a smart antioxidant approach look like? Dennis explained it to me by comparing it to investing, which finally made it click.

First, you want backup protection. Different antioxidants tackle different types of oxidative stress. It’s like having stocks, bonds, AND real estate instead of putting everything in cryptocurrency.

Second, these nutrients work better as a team. Vitamin E and selenium are the perfect example—selenium helps recycle oxidized vitamin E molecules, so they’re way more effective together than separately.

Finally, this diversity protects you against the unexpected—like when a polar vortex drops temperatures by 30 degrees overnight or when your calves need to be transported during the summer heat.

As Dennis puts it, “By proactively feeding a variety of antioxidants, we are essentially building a well-diversified financial portfolio for calf health.” I couldn’t have said it better myself.

LET’S TALK REALITY: WHEN BUDGETS ARE TIGHT

Look, I get it. Not everyone can implement a premium program across their entire operation overnight. Milk prices still have their ups and downs, and sometimes, you’ve got to make tough choices.

If you’re working with limited funds, here’s where to focus:

Put Your Money Where It Counts Most

Spend your nutrition dollars during these high-return periods:

Those critical first 30 days when immune challenges are highest
During stressful times like weaning, moving pens, or extreme weather
On your genetically superior animals that’ll command top dollar later

When You Can Dial It Back

You don’t always need to go premium:

When your calves are cruising along in ideal conditions
If you’ve got high-quality pasture with natural antioxidants
When you’re already using well-formulated commercial products

Start Small and Build

If you’re hesitant, try this stepped approach:

First, make sure you’re fortifying any whole milk or waste milk properly (it’s about 50% deficient in vitamin E and selenium)
Then, add targeted supplements during known stress periods
Eventually, work toward a comprehensive program as you see the results

THE COSTLY CRASH: WHEN CALVES GO INTO NUTRITIONAL DEBT

You know what keeps me up at night? Seeing calves in negative energy balance. It’s the nutritional equivalent of filing for bankruptcy—they burn more energy than they take in.

This typically happens during two critical periods that you need to be prepared for:

In early life, when milk intake just isn’t enough
During weaning, when starter intake hasn’t caught up to replacing milk nutrients

Dennis puts it perfectly: “If calves are fed a minimal cash flow diet or are low on savings, they are more vulnerable to oxidative stress, illness, and cell damage.”

I’ve seen this happen countless times, especially on farms using whole milk without fortification. It seems economical on paper, but here’s the reality check—whole milk contains about 50% less vitamin E and selenium than calves need. That’s a severe deficit you can’t ignore if you want top performance.

3 THINGS YOU CAN DO TODAY TO BOOST YOUR HEIFER PROFITS

Ready for some action steps? Here’s what’s working on the most profitable operations I visit:

1. Plan for Stress Before It Happens

Innovative producers build nutritional reserves before predictable challenges hit. It’s like keeping extra cash on hand for when you know your truck will need new tires.

Increase milk volume when cold weather is forecast. Add extra antioxidants before planned stressful events. Monitor starter intake carefully during weaning.

2. Mix Up Your Antioxidant Sources

The best operations don’t rely on just one type of protection. They use:

Glutathione precursors (fancy names for methionine and cysteine)
Vitamins A, C, and E
Trace minerals like selenium, copper, zinc, and manganese
Plant compounds that boost overall antioxidant function

3. Keep Your Eye on the Numbers

Successful businesses track metrics, right? Well, your calf program needs the same attention. Monitor health incidents, treatment costs, and growth rates. This data tells you whether your nutrition program is paying off.

As Dennis says, “A calf’s nutrient balance sheet should stay in the black, especially during challenging times when calves spend more of their energy and antioxidant currency.”

READY TO GET STARTED? HERE’S YOUR CHECKLIST:

✓ Take a hard look at what you’re doing now: Is your feeding program providing adequate antioxidants?
✓ Map out your stress points: When do your calves face the most significant challenges?
✓ Fix your whole milk program: If you’re feeding whole milk, address that 50% deficit
✓ Build reserves before stress hits: Don’t wait until calves are already struggling
✓ Track your results: Keep records so you can calculate your actual ROI

BOTTOM LINE: CAN YOU AFFORD NOT TO?

With Holstein Springers fetching $4,250 at Pipestone, I’m not asking if you can afford premium nutrition—I’m asking if you can afford to skip it.

The operations that view each calf as their business entity—requiring steady nutritional cash flow, adequate antioxidant savings, and a diversified nutritional portfolio—are thriving in today’s market.

Those still treating nutrition as just another expense to minimize? I hate to say it, but they’re leaving serious money on the table through lost opportunities, higher treatment costs, and calves that never reach their full genetic potential.

So what’s it going to be? Are you investing in your calves or just feeding them?

Key Takeaways

Treat each calf as a financial asset: With replacement heifers valued at $4,250+, premium nutrition delivers measurable ROI through reduced treatment costs, improved growth efficiency, and higher market value.
Energy functions as working capital: Calves have limited reserves and require consistent nutritional cash flow, particularly during the first four months and stress events like weaning, transportation, and extreme weather.
Diversify your antioxidant portfolio: Multiple complementary compounds (vitamins, minerals, plant-derived antioxidants) work synergistically to provide comprehensive protection against various forms of oxidative stress.
Fortify whole milk programs: Standard whole milk contains approximately 50% less vitamin E and selenium than required for optimal growth, creating a dangerous nutritional deficit that requires supplementation.
Highest returns come during toughest conditions: Premium nutrition delivers the greatest ROI precisely when baseline conditions are challenging—similar to finding investment opportunities in underserved markets.

Executive Summary

In today’s market where Holstein springers command $4,250, forward-thinking dairy producers are revolutionizing heifer development by treating each calf as its own business requiring careful “nutritional cash flow management.” This approach recognizes that calves need consistent streams of energy, amino acids, and antioxidants—similar to how businesses require steady cash flow to operate successfully. By implementing a diversified “antioxidant portfolio” that provides backup protection, synergistic effectiveness, and risk management, producers are seeing returns of 1,070-1,850% on their nutritional investments. The most successful operations strategically build nutritional reserves before predictable stressors, fortify whole milk programs to address natural deficiencies, and carefully monitor health and growth metrics to maintain their calves’ “nutrient balance sheets in the black”—maximizing future value in a tight replacement heifer market.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Categories : Management

Tags : Antioxidant supplementation, calf nutrition, Dairy ROI, Heifer value

Revolutionizing Calf Nutrition: How High-Protein Corn Co-Products Boost Growth While Cutting Feed Costs

Wednesday, March 12th, 2025

Ditch soybean meal? New ethanol byproducts boost calf growth 9% and slash costs. But beware: quality control is make-or-break.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Revolutionary high-protein corn co-products (HPCC) from ethanol production are challenging soybean meal’s dominance in calf starters. Kansas State research shows a 9% boost in post-weaning growth and potential cost savings with HPCC. These ingredients match soybean meal’s protein levels while retaining beneficial yeast components. Surprisingly, full replacement outperformed partial substitution. However, success hinges on rigorous quality control—heat damage can negate benefits. Proper amino acid balancing is crucial. While offering growth and efficiency advantages, HPCC requires careful supplier selection and a systematic implementation approach. This shift represents a significant opportunity for dairy producers to optimize heifer development and reduce environmental impact, but demands a data-driven, strategic approach to reap the full benefits.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

HPCC can increase post-weaning growth by 9% vs. soybean meal while potentially reducing feed costs
Processing quality is critical—ADICP testing is essential to avoid heat-damaged product
Complete HPCC replacement of soybean meal showed better results than partial substitution
Implementation requires careful amino acid balancing and systematic performance monitoring
Adoption offers both economic and environmental sustainability benefits when properly managed

high-protein corn co-products, calf nutrition, feed efficiency, ethanol byproducts, dairy heifer development

New research from Kansas State University reveals specialized ethanol industry co-products can outperform traditional soybean meal in calf starters, increasing post-weaning growth by 9% while potentially reducing feed costs. These innovative high-protein ingredients deliver superior performance—but only with careful supplier selection, proper quality assessment, and strategic implementation.

Beyond DDGs: How Ethanol’s Evolution Created a Superior Protein Source

Are you still formulating calf starters based on outdated protein assumptions? While conventional wisdom has long dismissed corn co-products for young calves, the ethanol industry’s technological revolution demands we reconsider these nutritional dogmas. Traditional dried distillers grains, with their elevated fiber content, rightfully earned a questionable reputation in starter formulations—but today’s high-protein corn co-products represent an entirely different nutritional proposition.

“The ethanol industry is getting aggressive about trying to add value to their co-products—it’s not just a byproduct anymore,” notes Dr. William Brown from Kansas State University, whose research has systematically challenged conventional protein source assumptions. Through sophisticated fractionation technologies, ethanol producers have engineered a new generation of corn co-products with protein levels reaching 50%—nutritionally comparable to soybean meal but with performance advantages that have surprised even skeptical nutritionists.

One such product, Protomax, exemplifies this new class of ingredients. With crude protein content matching soybean meal (approximately 50%), these specialized ingredients retain valuable yeast components from fermentation while substantially reducing the fibrous fractions that limited digestibility in traditional distillers grains. This represents a fundamental advancement in ingredient functionality that demands reconsidering long-established formulation practices in calf nutrition programs.

Growth Performance That Challenges Soybean Meal’s Dominance

Is your operation falling behind by clinging to outdated protein strategies while innovative producers are already capitalizing on next-generation ingredients? The research evidence should command your attention: Dr. Brown’s comprehensive study examined high-protein corn co-products (HPCC) as replacements for soybean meal in Holstein’s calves from 14 to 84 days of age, with results that challenge the protein status quo.

“We saw that calves on the high-protein corn product grew more and had a greater average daily gain,” states Dr. Brown, whose research documented this performance advantage, particularly during the post-weaning period. This improved growth performance represents a significant opportunity for dairy producers seeking to optimize heifer development programs and reduce time to first breeding—a metric with direct economic implications for lifetime productivity and operational profitability.

Most surprisingly, the complete replacement of soybean meal (100% HPCC) yielded better results than partial replacement (50% HPCC). This counterintuitive finding forces us to reconsider fundamental assumptions about protein source selection in young calves and challenges the conventional wisdom that would suggest a blended approach might be optimal.

Why This Matters

These performance differences translate to real economic impact through multiple pathways: Accelerated growth rates reduce days on feed, potentially lowering age at first calving while simultaneously improving feed efficiency. The compounding effect of these advantages creates opportunities for improved productivity and reduced input costs—a combination rarely available in dairy production.

Breaking the Protein Percentage Myth: The Hidden Nutritional Mechanisms

Has your nutritionist moved beyond formulating simply on crude protein percentage? This outdated approach misses the sophisticated nutritional mechanisms that make these new-generation ingredients perform differently than their predecessors. The superior performance observed with high-protein corn co-products stems from multiple dietary factors directly impacting calf development.

First, these co-products are enriched with yeast bodies from the fermentation process—a characteristic that traditional protein evaluation systems fail to value adequately. These yeast components provide bioactive compounds and micronutrients that support digestive health and immune function beyond their primary protein contribution. This represents a “hidden bonus” typically overlooked in conventional nutritional calculations based solely on proximate analysis.

Second, amino acid profile and balance prove critical to the performance equation. Dr. Brown’s research emphasized formulating diets with careful attention to essential amino acids such as lysine and methionine—potential limiting factors in calf growth. When properly balanced in the diet, high-protein corn co-products appear to deliver an amino acid profile that effectively supports accelerated growth rates.

Most critically, digestibility assessments conducted as part of the research found no significant negative impacts on nutrient utilization in weaned calves. This addresses one of the primary historical concerns about corn co-products—that their nutrients might be less available to the animal. The research demonstrates that despite their different origins, properly processed high-protein corn co-products can provide effectively utilized nutrients.

Process Quality: The Critical Variable That Determines Success or Failure

Processing quality control represents the most critical factor determining whether these ingredients deliver benefit or disappointment. A contrasting 2019 Kansas State University study examining high-protein corn products in lactating dairy cows found dramatically different results—reduced milk production and decreased digestibility.

What explains this apparent contradiction? The researchers identified excessive heat damage during drying as the likely culprit, with elevated acid detergent insoluble crude protein (ADICP) levels indicating Maillard reaction damage to the protein. This processing-related quality variation highlights why ingredient sourcing and quality assessment become essential when incorporating these products into your feeding program.

This stark contrast between results in calves versus lactating cows demonstrates how nutritional requirements and ingredient interactions shift across life stages. What works brilliantly in one context may disappoint in another—underscoring the need for targeted research rather than broad generalizations about ingredient value.

Why This Matters

The processing quality variability means that not all products labeled “high-protein corn co-products” will deliver equivalent results. Implementing proper quality assessment protocols—particularly ADICP analysis to detect heat damage—becomes essential to successfully adopting these ingredients. The performance differential between optimal and sub-optimal processing can entirely negate these ingredients’ potential advantages.

Real Numbers, Real Results: The Performance Data That’s Changing Feeding Programs

Understanding the specific performance impacts of high-protein corn co-products requires examining the research data. Dr. Brown’s study at Kansas State University provides compelling evidence of their effectiveness in calf starters, as shown in the following table:

Performance Parameter	0% HPCC (Control)	50% HPCC	100% HPCC	Statistical Effect
Starter Intake (kg/d, pre-weaning)	0.39	0.33	0.39	Quadratic (P < 0.05)
Starter Intake (kg/d, post-weaning)	2.45	2.32	2.58	Linear (P = 0.08)
Body Weight (kg, d 84)	95.85	97.60	99.48	Linear (P = 0.05)
Average Daily Gain (kg/d, post-weaning)	0.89	0.94	0.98	Linear (P = 0.05)
Feed Efficiency (gain:feed, post-weaning)	Males: 0.41Females: 0.38	Males: 0.40Females: 0.41	Males: 0.38Females: 0.42	Treatment × Sex (P = 0.04)
Insulin Concentration (μg/L)	0.37	0.43	0.48	Linear (P = 0.01)

These performance metrics reveal several essential patterns. First, the linear improvement in body weight and average daily gain as HPCC inclusion increased demonstrates a clear dose-dependent response. Second, the interesting quadratic effect on pre-weaning intake suggests complex palatability dynamics during this critical period. Finally, the treatment by sex interaction for feed efficiency highlights the importance of considering biological sex when implementing these ingredients—female calves appeared to respond more favorably to the complete replacement of soybean meal with HPCC.

Most importantly, these aren’t marginal improvements—the 9% increase in post-weaning average daily gain between control and 100% HPCC groups represents a substantial acceleration in growth that compounds over time. For producers focusing on accelerated heifer development programs, this performance differential could significantly reduce age at first calving, improving lifetime productivity metrics.

Head-to-Head Showdown: New-Gen HPCCs vs. Traditional Protein Sources

Parameter	Traditional DDGs	New-Generation HPCC	Soybean Meal	Practical Implications
Crude Protein	28-32%	45-55%	47-52%	HPCC protein levels match SBM, eliminating dilution concerns
Fiber Content	30-35% NDF	15-20% NDF	8-10% NDF	Reduced fiber in HPCC addresses traditional digestibility limitations
Yeast Components	Minimal	Significant	None	Bioactive compounds in HPCC may support digestive development
Processing Variability	Moderate	High	Low	Quality assessment critical for HPCC to avoid heat-damaged product
Amino Acid Profile	Lower lysine	Improved lysine	High lysine	Diet-level amino acid balancing essential with any protein source
Post-Weaning Performance	Limited	Superior to SBM in research	Industry standard	HPCC shows potential to enhance growth during critical transition period

This comparison reveals why these new-generation ingredients perform differently than their predecessors. The significant reduction in fiber content while maintaining high protein levels creates a nutritional profile more suitable for developing rumens. The improved amino acid profile addresses historical limitations, particularly for lysine (often limiting in corn-based proteins). However, the higher processing variability highlights why quality control becomes essential—without proper assessment, you could be incorporating heat-damaged protein with significantly reduced availability.

Risk Management Playbook: Protecting Your Investment When Transitioning to HPCCs

Implementing any new ingredient carries inherent risks. The following table provides a structured approach to evaluating and mitigating these risks when incorporating high-protein corn co-products into your calf nutrition program:

Risk Factor	Traditional SBM	High-Protein Corn Co-Products	Mitigation Strategy
Processing Quality Variation	Low	High	Request ADICP analysis to verify heat damage levels
Palatability Challenges	Minimal	Potential	Implement gradual transition over 7-10 days
Amino Acid Balance	High lysine naturally	Requires balancing	Ensure diet formulation includes synthetic amino acids or complementary proteins
Batch-to-Batch Consistency	Consistent	Variable	Establish quality testing protocols with supplier
Performance Monitoring Requirements	Standard	Enhanced	Implement weekly growth measurements during transition
Rumen Development Effects	Well-established	Emerging research	Monitor starter intake patterns and fecal consistency
Cost Volatility	Moderate	Potentially higher	Consider contracting options to stabilize pricing

This framework highlights why a methodical implementation approach remains essential. The primary dangers—processing quality variation and amino acid balance—can be mitigated through proper quality testing and formulation strategies. However, the enhanced monitoring requirements underscore the importance of data-driven decision-making when evaluating these ingredients in your specific operation.

From Research to Reality: Your 24-Week Implementation Blueprint

Are you ready to capitalize on these innovative ingredients? Success requires more than simply swapping protein sources and hoping for the best. Based on the available research and practical experience, here’s a structured approach to implementing high-protein corn co-products in your calf nutrition program:

Phase 1: Ingredient Assessment and Selection (Weeks 1-4)

Identify suppliers of high-protein corn co-products with consistent quality control
Request complete nutrient analysis, including protein fractions (particularly ADICP levels)
Conduct small-scale palatability testing with a subset of calves
Establish baseline growth metrics for your current program to enable accurate comparison

Phase 2: Initial Implementation (Weeks 5-12)

Work with your nutritionist to reformulate starters with complete amino acid balancing.
Consider 100% replacement of soybean meal rather than partial substitution
Implement with a limited group while maintaining control animals on the current program
Monitor intake patterns during the first 72 hours to identify any palatability issues
Track weekly weight gain, structural growth, and health metrics

Phase 3: Performance Evaluation (Weeks 13-24)

Compare growth rates, feed efficiency, and health outcomes between treatment groups.
Calculate actual economic impact based on ingredient costs and performance differences.
Assess post-weaning transition success through intake and growth stability
Determine optimal inclusion rates based on your specific results and economic conditions

The research shows these ingredients can dramatically improve performance—but only when properly implemented. With processing variability creating significant quality differences between products, systematic evaluation becomes essential to avoid disappointing results. This structured approach minimizes risk while maximizing the opportunity to capture the proven performance benefits.

Global Adoption Trends: Are North American Producers Lagging?

The interest in high-protein corn co-products extends well beyond North American borders, with European dairy systems actively exploring these ingredients. The Netherlands and Denmark, known for their intensive calf-raising operations, have incorporated similar high-protein fermentation products into premium starter formulations, often with more aggressive amino acid balancing than typical North American approaches.

Dutch researchers at Wageningen University have systematically evaluated the effects of these ingredients on rumen development, finding accelerated papillae development with correctly processed products. Similarly, the Danish Agricultural Advisory Service has documented implementation in commercial herds, reporting results consistent with the Kansas State findings on growth performance.

In contrast, New Zealand and Australian dairy systems have approached these ingredients more cautiously. Their predominantly pasture-based models create different economic considerations for early life nutrition investments, emphasizing early rumen forage adaptation rather than accelerated growth. This regional variation in adoption patterns reflects essential differences in production systems and economic drivers.

Asian markets, particularly China’s rapidly expanding dairy sector, have shown strong interest in these technologies as they establish modern heifer development systems. Several large-scale Chinese operations have implemented similar ingredients with reported success, though peer-reviewed research from these implementations remains limited.

Why This Matters

The international adoption of similar nutritional strategies validates the underlying scientific principles while highlighting the importance of adapting implementation to local conditions. North American producers have the advantage of more extensive university research on these specific ingredients. Still, they may be less aggressive in commercial implementation than their European counterparts—creating both an opportunity and a potential competitive disadvantage as global dairy markets become increasingly interconnected.

The Hidden Green Dividend: Environmental Benefits That Add Marketing Value

How does incorporating these ingredients impact your operation’s environmental footprint? Utilizing co-products from ethanol production represents a classic example of circular economy principles in agriculture—converting what might otherwise be considered a manufacturing byproduct into a value-added feed ingredient with superior nutritional properties.

This repurposing reduces the overall environmental footprint of both industries, as the energy and resources required to produce the original corn are effectively distributed across multiple product streams. For dairy producers focusing on sustainability metrics and documentation, incorporating these ingredients potentially offers both environmental and economic benefits—a compelling combination in today’s market environment increasingly focused on sustainable production methods.

Additionally, the improved growth performance observed may translate to accelerated heifer development timelines, potentially reducing the overall resource intensity of replacement heifer programs. This life-cycle perspective on resource utilization highlights why ingredient selection impacts extend beyond simple daily feed costs, potentially contributing to broader sustainability goals that increasingly factor into milk procurement decisions by major processors.

The Bottom Line: Taking Action in a Changing Protein Landscape

High-protein corn co-products represent a significant advancement in dairy calf nutrition, offering a compelling alternative to traditional protein sources in starter formulations. The Kansas State University research published in the Journal of Dairy Science (2023) demonstrates their potential to enhance growth performance and improve feed efficiency without compromising digestibility or rumen development.

For your dairy operation, this presents an opportunity to optimize heifer development programs while potentially reducing feed costs—a combination that deserves serious consideration in today’s challenging economic environment. However, success depends on critical factors:

Ingredient Quality Assessment: To avoid heat-damaged products, implement a specific testing protocol for ADICP levels. Values exceeding 12% indicate excessive heat damage and substantially reduced protein availability.
Proper Amino Acid Balancing: Work with a nutritionist to ensure lysine and methionine levels meet requirements. Research from the University of Minnesota demonstrates that balancing for these specific amino acids can further enhance the growth response by an additional 5-7%.
Systematic Implementation Protocol: Follow the three-phase approach outlined above, with particular attention to establishing baseline metrics before implementation.
Economic Evaluation Framework: Conduct a comprehensive ROI analysis that includes ingredient cost differences and long-term benefits from accelerated growth rates.

Are you ready to challenge conventional wisdom and explore these innovative ingredients in your calf feeding program? The research suggests nutritional complacency carries its own cost. Forward-thinking producers who carefully implement and evaluate these ingredients may gain a competitive advantage through improved heifer development efficiency—positioning their operations for enhanced long-term productivity in an increasingly competitive global dairy landscape.

Learn more:

Categories : Nutrition

Tags : calf nutrition, dairy heifer development, ethanol byproducts, Feed Efficiency, high-protein corn co-products

How to Raise a Healthy Calf: Essential Tips for Reducing Mortality and Boosting Growth

Monday, June 17th, 2024

Uncover crucial strategies for rearing healthy calves, minimizing mortality, and enhancing growth. Master the techniques for maximizing colostrum and milk feeding to nurture robust calves.

A good dairy herd depends on raised, healthy calves. Despite the challenges of early calf raising, success stories from German research on dairy farms, where a 17% calf loss rate was reduced through effective early rearing, inspire confidence in the potential for improvement.

High calf mortality and disease compromise attempts at herd health and animal welfare. Developing good, efficient dairy cows depends on prioritizing preweaning calf health. This path starts early in the weeks and months of a calf’s life.

The basis of a good dairy cow is a preweaning calf in good condition. From the value of the colostrum period to implementing aggressive milk-feeding programs, your role in rearing solid calves is crucial. Every stride you take is meant to reduce health hazards and boost development possibilities. Ready to discover more? Let’s examine the most excellent techniques for producing muscular, healthy calves.

The Lifesaving Liquid: Colostrum as the First Line of Defense

Early immunity of a calf depends on colostrum, which is the first milk produced by the mother after birth. It is high in immunoglobulins like IgG that guard against illnesses and lower death rates.

Using the “4 golden rules” of colostrum feeding:

Feed colostrum six hours after delivery for best absorption of immunoglobulin.
Three to four liters will help to guarantee enough immunoglobulins.
Make sure colostrum has IgG levels of more than 50g/L.
Maintaining a bacterial level of less than 100,000 cfu/mL helps to avoid illnesses.

High-quality colostrum powder, vitamins, and probiotics strengthen health and immunity by fortifying colostrum, promoting improved gut health and development.

Beyond Immunoglobulins: The Multidimensional Benefits of Colostrum

Apart from the vital function of immunoglobulins in colostrum, additional elements greatly influence a calf’s early growth and health. Prebiotics, which are non-digestible food ingredients that promote the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines, help good bacteria in the stomach flourish and create a healthy intestinal flora. By exposing antigens and triggering reactions, leucocytes—also known as white blood cells—offer passive immunity and protect against infections, helping the calf’s immune system mature.

Intestinal development, which refers to the growth and maturation of the intestines, depends critically on growth hormones like insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β). They support the development of intestinal cells and help to create a robust intestinal barrier, therefore supporting gut lining repair and maintenance for adequate nutrient absorption.

Essential for its development and general well-being, these elements significantly increase the calf’s capacity to resist infections and maintain intestinal health. Rest assured, the unmatched relevance of colostrum in calf raising is highlighted by the combined impacts of oligosaccharides, leucocytes, and growth factors in colostrum, laying the basis for a good and robust existence.

From Economic Pressures to Nutritional Innovations: The Evolution of Calf Feeding Practices

Historically, economic constraints affected calf nutrition practices, resulting in limited milk-feeding schedules meant to save costs. This approach often sacrificed development and health, requiring reducing milk or milk replacement to around 10% of the calf’s daily weight.

Modern techniques stress ad libitum feeding, a method that allows calves to eat as much as they want, up to 20% of their body weight daily. This approach enables daily weight increases of over one kilogram, fostering strong development and immune system functioning. Essential for this approach is giving enough energy and a balanced protein-to-energy ratio for best growth.

The change from limited to intensive feeding programs prioritizes dairy calves’ health, development, and long-term production, guaranteeing a good foundation for their future success as dairy cows.

The Modern Paradigm Shift: Balancing Energy and Protein in Calf Nutrition for Optimal Growth

These days, calf nutrition emphasizes balancing protein needs with calories to support development and growth. Calves need a constant metabolizable energy intake for good weight increase, which is necessary for future dairy cow production.

The protein-to-calorie ratio is vital for lean tissue development. Protein helps organs and muscles grow and stops fat buildup. Current feeding plans, comprising almost 8 liters of milk or more than 1.2 kg of milk replacer powder daily, illustrate this complete approach. These strategies guarantee calves get the required nutrients for strong development, unlike limited feeding approaches.

High-quality milk protein is vital, especially considering the high skimmed milk content. Although other proteins, such as vegetables and whey, have been investigated, their effectiveness could be better. Vegetable proteins, like hydrolyzed wheat protein, show potential when combined with skimmed milk powder, providing more flexible feeding plans.

Feeding Intensity and Protein Quality: A New Era in Calf Nutrition

The quality of protein in milk replacements becomes critical as feeding intensity rises. Milk-derived proteins- including those found in skimmed milk- are recommended for their exceptional digestibility and balanced amino acid composition, which match young calves’ dietary requirements. Early studies revealed that vegetable proteins, such as soy, caused digestive difficulties, resulting in inadequate development and health.

However, recent research has demonstrated improvements in vegetable protein compositions, increasing their viability by breaking down hydrolyzed proteins—like wheat protein—into smaller peptides, digestion and absorption increase. These proteins balance cost and nutrition to promote development and health on par with conventional milk proteins.

Revolutionizing Calf Rearing: The Comprehensive Impact of High-Quality Milk Feeding Protocols

High-quality milk-feeding programs have transformed calf raising by improving growth rates, organ development, and immunological response. Early and sufficient food delivery from intense milk feeding significantly enhances calf health and vigor.

Accelerated growth rate—not just in weight but also in ideal body composition—including lean tissue and appropriate organ development—is a critical advantage of intense milk feeding. Studies on calves on extensive milk diets find that their gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems are more robust than those on limited diets.

Furthermore, regular milk intake helps the immunological response. Enough early nourishment helps the immune system mature and operate as it should. An enhanced milk diet reduces susceptibility to infections and illnesses and aids the growth of the intestinal epithelium and mucosal immune system. A well-fed intestinal immune system fights against diarrhea, a main cause of morbidity and death in newborn calves.

Moreover, vital milk intake guarantees the development of the intestinal lining and its immunological properties. Fortified milk formulae, often containing organic acids and probiotics, help maintain gut flora health. This builds resistance against diseases, in addition to helping to absorb nutrients and increase digestive efficiency.

Intense milk-feeding techniques provide a complete calf health strategy, encouraging faster development, improved organ formation, and excellent immunity. These methods show the need for early-life nutrition for long-term animal welfare and performance as they move from cost-minimizing to holistic health and productivity.

The Bottom Line

Starting an intense milk-feeding regimen from a newborn has several advantages. Stronger young animals result from better postnatal development promoted by it and from aid against health problems. Improved colostrum intake and enough milk replacer feeding improve intestinal growth and immunity, hence lowering diarrhea in neonatal and pre-weaning phases. Good early feeding management also increases lifetime performance in dairy cows, therefore stressing the need for contemporary dairy farming.

Key Takeaways:

The early calf rearing phase is critical, with mortality rates up to 17% within the first six months in some regions.
Colostrum feeding must follow the “4 golden rules”: quickness, quantity, quality, and cleanliness to ensure proper immunity transfer.
Feeding colostrum within six hours of birth and in adequate volumes (3-4 L) significantly reduces the risk of illness and mortality.
A shift from restrictive to ad libitum milk feeding can lead to better growth rates and higher daily weight gains in calves.
Modern feeding strategies focus on balancing energy and protein intake for optimal lean tissue growth and overall health.
The quality of milk replacers is essential, with an emphasis on high skimmed milk content and improved vegetable protein sources.
Intensive milk feeding programs support the development of the intestinal immune system and protect against neonatal diseases.
Proper early nutrition influences not only calf health but also the lifetime performance of dairy cows.

Summary: A successful dairy herd relies on healthy calves, and early rearing strategies can significantly reduce calf mortality and disease. Colostrum, the first milk produced by the mother after birth, plays a vital role in early immunity and gut health. The “4 golden rules” of colostrum feeding include feeding six hours after delivery, ensuring three to four liters of colostrum, maintaining IgG levels, and a bacterial level of less than 100,000 cfu/mL to avoid illnesses. Colostrum also contains beneficial microorganisms, such as prebiotics, which promote the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines and create a healthy intestinal flora. Growth hormones like insulin-like growth factors and TGF-β support the development of intestinal cells and a robust intestinal barrier for adequate nutrient absorption. Modern calf nutrition practices have been influenced by economic constraints, leading to limited milk-feeding schedules. Fortified milk formulae, often containing organic acids and probiotics, help maintain gut flora health, build resistance against diseases, absorb nutrients, and increase digestive efficiency.

Categories : Management

Slide 2: Slide 2
Slide 6: Slide 6
Slide 1: Slide 1
Slide 3: Slide 3
Slide 4: Slide 4

Overlays

Slide 10: Slide 10
Slide 8: Slide 8
Slide 8: Slide 8
Slide 5: Slide 5
Slide 5: Slide 5
Style_Bullvine: Style_Bullvine

Overlays

Send this to a friend

Search

Archive for calf nutrition

The $40 Weaning Question: Why Some Farms Skip Binders and Get Better Results

Is spending $10 on binders smarter than waiting 2 weeks to wean?

What’s Actually Happening During Weaning

Learning from Different Approaches

The Money Side of Things

Weaning Economics: Traditional vs. Extended Approaches

How Location Changes Everything

Making Changes That Actually Work

Practical Weaning Readiness Checklist

Finding What Works for Your Farm

Where Things Are Heading

Making Smart Decisions for Your Operation

Where to Find More Information:

Learn More:

The Feed Tag Fine Print: 7 Nutrients That Actually Drive Calf Health

Research shows 7 nutrients can cut calf treatment costs up to 20% when fed in bioavailable forms versus cheap alternatives

Red Flags That Cost Real Money

Every Region Has Its Mineral Curveballs

The Seven Game-Changers That Actually Matter

Vitamin E: Your Antioxidant Shield

Selenium: The Missing Piece

Zinc: Your Gut Guardian

Copper: Easy to Lose, Expensive to Replace

Manganese: The Quiet Builder

Glutamine: The Stress-Buster

Arginine: The Circulation Enhancer

Your Feed Tag Cheat Sheet

The Bottom Line: Your Wallet Will Thank You

Your Action Plan

The Hard Truth

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Learn More:

Ditch the Dogma: The Hidden Truths in the Latest May 2025 Journal of Dairy Science Animal Nutrition Research That Could Explode Your Bottom Line

Explosive new research shatters dairy nutrition myths. Your feed program’s bleeding cash—here’s the science to stop it.

FEED EFFICIENCY: THOSE FANCY RFI METRICS? MAYBE NOT SO FANCY AFTER ALL.

THE NITROGEN NIGHTMARE: MUN ISN’T THE MAGIC BULLET YOU THINK IT IS

CALF NUTRITION: THE CRADLE-TO-GRAVE PROFIT LEAK (OR GOLDMINE)

PROTEIN WARS: WHY CANOLA MEAL IS SCHOOLING THE SOYBEAN STALWARTS (AND THE MODELS)

THE METHANE MESS: THAT FANCY ADDITIVE WORKS… A LITTLE TOO WELL?

FORAGE FUNDAMENTALS: IS YOUR “PERFECT” HARVEST TIMING ACTUALLY COSTING YOU?

THE BUFFER BLUNDER: WHEN “FIXING” HINDGUT ACIDOSIS CREATES NEW HEADACHES

AMINO ACID AWAKENING: THE RUMEN ISN’T AS DUMB AS WE THOUGHT

THE LONG SHADOW OF THE MILK PAIL: EARLY NUTRITION’S LIFELONG METABOLIC ECHO

THE BOTTOM LINE

Learn more:

The $4,250 Springer: Why Your Calf Nutrition Program Might Be Leaving Money on The Table

With Holstein springers fetching $4,250, are you sacrificing $1,000 in future value to save $20 on feed costs? Your calves aren’t just livestock—they’re assets.

LET’S TALK CALF ECONOMICS (WITHOUT THE BORING PARTS)

ENERGY: THE STUFF THAT MAKES THE MAGIC HAPPEN

THE GREAT DIVIDE: INVESTORS VS. PENNY-PINCHERS

BUILDING YOUR CALF’S ANTIOXIDANT PORTFOLIO

LET’S TALK REALITY: WHEN BUDGETS ARE TIGHT

Put Your Money Where It Counts Most

When You Can Dial It Back

Start Small and Build

THE COSTLY CRASH: WHEN CALVES GO INTO NUTRITIONAL DEBT

3 THINGS YOU CAN DO TODAY TO BOOST YOUR HEIFER PROFITS

1. Plan for Stress Before It Happens

2. Mix Up Your Antioxidant Sources

3. Keep Your Eye on the Numbers

READY TO GET STARTED? HERE’S YOUR CHECKLIST:

BOTTOM LINE: CAN YOU AFFORD NOT TO?

Key Takeaways

Executive Summary

Learn more:

Revolutionizing Calf Nutrition: How High-Protein Corn Co-Products Boost Growth While Cutting Feed Costs

Ditch soybean meal? New ethanol byproducts boost calf growth 9% and slash costs. But beware: quality control is make-or-break.

Beyond DDGs: How Ethanol’s Evolution Created a Superior Protein Source

Growth Performance That Challenges Soybean Meal’s Dominance

Why This Matters

Breaking the Protein Percentage Myth: The Hidden Nutritional Mechanisms

Process Quality: The Critical Variable That Determines Success or Failure

Why This Matters

Real Numbers, Real Results: The Performance Data That’s Changing Feeding Programs

Head-to-Head Showdown: New-Gen HPCCs vs. Traditional Protein Sources

Risk Management Playbook: Protecting Your Investment When Transitioning to HPCCs

From Research to Reality: Your 24-Week Implementation Blueprint