Archive for European dairy industry

The Day LSD Crossed the Channel: Why This Changes Everything for Dairy Producers

Think LSD would affect you? Italy thought the same thing… until June 23rd changed everything for European dairy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Here’s what happened that should scare the hell out of every dairy producer: LSD isn’t staying “over there” anymore—it’s crossed into Europe and the economic fallout is brutal. Thailand’s outbreak data shows affected farms lost $727 per operation compared to $349 for clean herds, with milk production dropping 20-30% during acute phases… and some operations seeing losses up to 50%. Recovery isn’t quick either—we’re talking six months or more to get back to normal production levels, which means your feed conversion ratios go to hell while your cows burn energy fighting this virus instead of filling the bulk tank. The trade response was immediate and devastating: Australia and the UK suspended imports overnight, wiping out decades of market development in a single day. Climate change is extending vector seasons everywhere, making this a when-not-if scenario for most dairy regions. You need to start preparing your biosecurity protocols now, not after LSD shows up in your neighborhood.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Vaccination ROI beats outbreak costs by 10:1 — Mass vaccination runs $8-10 per head all-in, while outbreak losses can hit $200-500 per cow monthly during acute phases. Start conversations with your vet about homologous vaccine availability before you need it.
  • Vector control investments pay for themselves fast — European operations spending €50,000 on enhanced insect management systems are seeing immediate returns compared to potential 6-month recovery timelines. Audit your standing water, manure management, and housing ventilation this month.
  • Monthly clinical inspections are your new normal — Train your crew to spot skin lesions and nodules during high-risk periods (April-October) because early detection is the difference between managing a case and losing your herd. Document everything for insurance and trade certification purposes.
  • Insurance companies are already pricing LSD risk — Some providers are offering 3-5% premium discounts for documented biosecurity plans that include vector control measures. That’s $1,500-2,500 back in your pocket on a $50,000 annual premium, plus you’re ahead of the curve when regulations tighten.
  • Trade certification requirements are changing fast — Enhanced quarantine protocols and source verification are becoming standard for cattle purchases, so build relationships with suppliers who can meet the new documentation standards before they become mandatory.

You know that feeling when something you’ve been dreading actually happens? That’s exactly what hit me when I heard about Italy’s first LSD case back in June. We’d all been watching this disease tear through Africa and Asia for years, telling ourselves it was “their problem.” Well… not anymore.

The thing about Lumpy Skin Disease is that most of us dairy folks figured it would stay put in those distant regions. But June 23rd changed everything. Italy confirmed their first case on a farm in Sardinia, and within days, France had their own outbreak up in Chambéry. Their very first case ever.

I’ve been tracking disease patterns for over two decades, and this one’s keeping me up at night.

How Fast Everything Went Sideways

The European LSD Incursion (June 2025). The map shows the initial outbreak sites in Sardinia (Italy) and Chambéry (France), along with the documented spread to mainland Italy. EU protocols mandate 20-km protection zones and 50-km surveillance zones to contain the disease.

What strikes me about this whole situation is the speed—we’re talking days, not weeks or months. Italy went from zero cases to implementing stamping-out protocols across multiple sites faster than you could say “movement restriction.” France took the nuclear option and depopulated that entire Chambéry operation. When you’re talking about complete herd elimination, you know the veterinary authorities aren’t messing around.

Here’s what really gets you, though… the pathway tells you everything about how vulnerable our cattle movement systems actually are. Contact tracing showed animals moved from that original Sardinian farm straight to Lombardy’s Mantua province, carrying LSD right along with them. Despite all our protocols, despite everything we thought we had, we were still vulnerable.

The trade response was brutal and immediate. Australia pulled Italy and France from their LSD-free country lists faster than you could process an export certificate. Live cattle, genetics, raw milk products—all suspended overnight. The UK followed within hours. I’m talking about twenty years of market development, gone in a single day.

The Numbers That’ll Ruin Your Sleep

I’ve been digging through recent work from the Journal of Dairy Science on Thailand’s 2021 outbreak, and honestly… the economics are terrifying. According to research published in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases (2022), dairy operations during active outbreaks showed average total financial losses of $727 per farm compared to $349 for non-affected operations. That’s not just a statistical difference—that’s real money that determines whether you make your next loan payment or start having very uncomfortable conversations with your banker.

But here’s what really hits home for those of us in the milk business… the production impacts are devastating. You’re looking at milk yield drops that can reach 20-30% during acute phases, and some operations—especially those caught completely off guard—have seen losses pushing 40-50%. Your feed conversion ratios? They basically collapse when cattle are burning energy fighting this virus instead of putting it into the bulk tank.

What’s particularly troubling is how long recovery takes. This isn’t like treating a case of mastitis, where you see improvement in a few days. According to field observations across multiple countries (and I’ve talked to producers who’ve lived through this), it can take six months or more to get back to normal production levels. Factor in the reproductive impacts—and trust me, they’re significant—and you’re looking at a multi-year recovery timeline.

Europe’s Response Actually Worked… Sort Of

The EU’s response impressed me, and I don’t often say that about government responses to anything. They’ve got this vaccine bank system they built after that Balkan disaster from 2015-2017, and it actually functions when they need it to. According to work published in the EFSA Journal (2023), they maintain substantial vaccine reserves with established deployment protocols that can be activated within 48 hours of outbreak confirmation.

What’s fascinating is how much they learned from those Balkan outbreaks. Back then, according to the World Organisation for Animal Health surveillance data, they went from over 7,400 outbreaks in 2016 down to just 385 in 2017. That’s a 95% reduction in one year, and it came down to one thing: mass vaccination campaigns using homologous vaccines, not the cheap alternatives some countries tried.

The current protocol—20-kilometer protection zones with 28-day movement restrictions, 50-kilometer surveillance zones with enhanced monitoring—it’s all based on hard-won experience. The Balkans collectively spent over €20 million during their outbreak period, but they actually eradicated the disease completely. Compare that to the alternative…

Trade Reality That Changes Everything

Here’s where this gets personal for anyone moving genetics or dairy products internationally. I know folks in the genetics business who literally watched their European shipments stop overnight. Years of relationship building, market development, and customer trust—all put on indefinite hold because of disease detection.

That’s how the international trade system works with notifiable diseases under OIE protocols. LSD detection triggers automatic restrictions. It’s not negotiable, it’s not political—it’s just how the system functions globally. And with dairy genetics becoming increasingly international (artificial insemination companies are shipping semen globally now more than ever), these restrictions hit hard and fast.

The ripple effects extend way beyond direct exports, though. Feed suppliers, equipment dealers, and even AI companies feel the pinch when movement restrictions go up. I talked to a Wisconsin-based genetics company last week—they can’t name names, but they’re a major player—and their European business dropped 80% overnight. “Twenty years building those relationships,” the VP told me, “and one disease detection basically shuts it all down.”

The Vector Problem We Can’t Fence Out

An Integrated Vector Control Program. Since LSD is primarily spread by biting insects, biosecurity must extend beyond the fenceline. These four practices form the foundation of a robust program to reduce insect pressure and lower transmission risk.

This is where it gets really interesting—and honestly, scary. Recent work published in Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2024) has confirmed that stable flies, mosquitoes, and various tick species can all transmit LSD virus between cattle. These aren’t just theoretical vectors—they’re proven disease spreaders in real-world conditions.

The transmission dynamics are eye-opening. According to research from veterinary entomologists, clinical animals are significantly more likely to infect by feeding insects compared to subclinical cases. That differential explains why outbreaks can seem to explode seemingly out of nowhere. You might have subclinical circulation for weeks before seeing your first clinical case, then suddenly you’re dealing with a full-blown outbreak.

Most herd-to-herd spread happens over relatively short distances—often within 2-3 kilometers. What that means for producers in dense dairy regions like the Po Valley, Brittany, or even parts of Wisconsin and California… well, let’s just say traditional biosecurity just got a lot more complicated. You can’t exactly build a fence to keep out flies.

The Vaccination Game Changer

The data from mass vaccination programs tells a compelling story. Research published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2023) shows that properly implemented vaccination campaigns using homologous vaccines can achieve up to a 119% reduction in new case numbers. But here’s the critical part—and this is where I’ve seen producers get burned—vaccine choice matters more than most people realize.

Vaccines made from actual LSD virus (homologous vaccines) work. Period. Vaccines based on related poxviruses like sheep pox or goat pox… not so much. I’ve heard from producers in Eastern Europe who used heterologous vaccines and kept seeing cases despite achieving 90% coverage rates in their herds. The serology looked good, but the protection just wasn’t there.

The European experience during the Balkans outbreak proves this point perfectly. Countries that invested in homologous vaccines—Serbia, Bulgaria, North Macedonia—they eliminated the disease. Countries that went with cheaper alternatives because of budget constraints? Some are still dealing with sporadic cases eight years later.

What This Means for Your Bottom Line

Telltale Signs of Lumpy Skin Disease. Characteristic skin nodules on an infected bovine. Training all farm personnel to identify these lesions during routine checks is the most critical factor for early detection and containment.

Look, the climate data suggests vector seasons are getting longer everywhere. I’m seeing reports from extension services across multiple states showing warmer temperatures and extended insect activity periods. That’s creating more opportunities for disease spread, plain and simple.

According to global surveillance data compiled by veterinary epidemiologists, we’re seeing new countries report LSD outbreaks at a rate that’s frankly alarming. Since 2012, the pattern has been consistent—about 2-3 new countries per year joining the “LSD-affected” list. And that trend isn’t slowing down.

For dairy producers, this changes the biosecurity conversation completely. We’re not just talking about limiting visitors anymore (though that’s still important). We’re talking about integrated vector control programs, standing water management, and manure handling protocols that consider insect breeding sites. It’s a completely different level of operational complexity.

Here’s what monthly clinical inspections need to look like now: Train your crew to recognize skin lesions, nodules, and any suspicious clinical signs. I’m talking about systematic visual inspections of every animal, not just the ones that look “off.” The sooner you catch something, the better your chances of limiting the spread and avoiding worst-case scenarios.

Real Changes Happening Right Now

I’m seeing operations across different regions starting to adapt, and the investment levels are significant. Some dairies in the Netherlands (I can’t name specific operations, but these are 800+ cow facilities) have invested upwards of €50,000 in enhanced vector control—improved ventilation systems, strategic insecticide programs, even housing modifications to reduce insect pressure. That’s real money, but when you consider the alternative…

Others are completely overhauling their cattle purchase protocols. One large dairy in northern Germany told me they’ve extended their quarantine periods from 7 days to 30 days, added pre-movement health screening that goes way beyond basic health certificates, and implemented source verification protocols that would have seemed excessive just two years ago.

The insurance angle is particularly interesting. I’m hearing from farm insurance providers across multiple states that they’re starting to incorporate disease preparedness into their risk assessments. Some are offering premium discounts of 3-5% for operations with documented biosecurity plans that include vector control measures. That might not sound like much, but on a $50,000 annual premium, that’s $1,500-2,500 back in your pocket.

Regional Differences That Actually Matter

What’s fascinating is how different regions are responding based on their specific challenges. Operations in Mediterranean climates—southern Italy, parts of Spain, even southern California—are focusing heavily on vector control because their insect seasons are longer and populations are higher. Makes perfect sense when you think about it.

But up north in places like Denmark, Wisconsin, or even parts of New York, they’re more concerned about cattle movement patterns because their vector pressure is still relatively seasonal. Different problems, different solutions.

Feed costs are playing into the economics, too, and this is where regional differences really show up. Producers in France are telling me they’re paying €300-320 per metric ton for quality corn, up from €200 just three years ago. When you’re already dealing with elevated feed costs, any production hit from disease becomes even more devastating to already tight margins.

The Vaccination Investment Reality Check

The ROI on LSD Preparedness. The economics are not close. A one-time investment in a proper vaccination program is dwarfed by the potential monthly per-cow losses during an active outbreak, making proactive vaccination one of the highest-return biosecurity investments an operation can make.

Here’s what producers need to understand about vaccination economics, and I’m going to give you real numbers based on recent procurement data. Mass vaccination campaigns using homologous vaccines typically run $4-6 per head for the vaccine itself, plus administration costs. Let’s say you’re looking at $8-10 per head all-in for a proper vaccination program.

Compare that to the documented losses from outbreak situations… according to economic analysis published in the Journal of Dairy Science (2024), affected operations are seeing monthly losses that can run $200-500 per cow during acute phases. The math isn’t complicated—vaccination is cheap insurance.

Countries and regions with pre-positioned vaccine stocks consistently fare better than those scrambling to react. The EU’s vaccine bank model, supported by regional cost-sharing agreements, represents what every major dairy region should be implementing. But it requires upfront investment and political coordination that isn’t always easy to achieve.

Where This All Leads

The European outbreaks of 2025 probably mark the beginning of something much bigger. Vector-borne diseases don’t respect borders, and our global cattle trade networks create pathways for spread that simply didn’t exist fifty years ago. I mean, we’re moving genetics internationally at a scale that would have been unimaginable to previous generations.

Smart producers are already thinking ahead, and the investment levels I’m seeing suggest they’re taking this seriously. Enhanced surveillance systems, improved biosecurity protocols, vaccination preparedness—these aren’t just regulatory compliance exercises anymore. They’re business survival strategies.

What really worries me is how unprepared some regions still are. LSD has been devastating operations across Africa and Asia for decades, but somehow we convinced ourselves it wouldn’t reach European or North American shores. Well, it’s here in Europe now, and the learning curve is steep.

I keep thinking about that genetics company executive I mentioned earlier. Twenty years of building European markets, gone overnight because of disease detection. That’s the new reality we’re all operating in, whether we like it or not.

The Bottom Line for Your Operation

Don’t Wait, Prepare. The lesson from Europe is that reaction is exponentially more costly than preparation. Use this checklist to start a conversation with your team and your advisors this week.

The lesson from Europe is crystal clear: preparation costs way less than reaction. Whether you’re running 50 cows or 5,000, whether you’re in Wisconsin or Waikato, the economics of preparedness versus panic response aren’t even close.

This isn’t just about animal health anymore—it’s about protecting the economic foundation of dairy operations worldwide. Because once LSD gets established in a region, eradication becomes exponentially harder and more expensive. Look at how long it took to clear it from the Balkans, and they had the EU’s resources behind them.

The European dairy industry will adapt, like it always does. We’re resilient that way—we’ve weathered price crashes, regulatory changes, trade wars, and everything else thrown at us. But the cost of that adaptation… that’s what we’re all still calculating.

The producers who get ahead of this curve? They’re the ones who’ll still be in business when the dust settles. And the ones who wait until LSD shows up in their neighborhood? Well, let’s just say the Thailand and Balkan experiences suggest that’s not a strategy you want to bet your operation on.

Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Ireland’s Milk Production Surges 34% in November, Boosting European Output

Irish dairy farms shatter records with a 34% milk production surge. Discover how this boom reshapes European markets and what it means for global dairy trends.

Summary:

In November 2024, Ireland’s milk production jumped by 34%, producing a record 510 million liters. This growth came from better weather, higher profits for farmers, and help from dairy companies. Ireland’s milk, with fat content of 4.99% and protein content of 3.98%, matches high standards. This boom also increased production in European countries like Poland and France. While this could create more competition and affect prices worldwide, it might help European farmers sell more to places like Asia and Africa. Dr. Emma O’Sullivan points out that focusing on sustainable farming practices is crucial for the future.

Key Takeaways:

  • Ireland’s milk production in November 2024 marked a record-breaking 510 million liters, demonstrating a 34% surge compared to the previous year.
  • Improvements in weather conditions, favorable economic variables, and targeted processor initiatives have fueled this significant production increase.
  • Ireland’s milk showcased better fat and protein content than U.S. averages during the same period.
  • European milk production trends reveal growth in several key countries, balancing production declines in others, such as Germany and the Netherlands.
  • This surge suggests a potential reshaping of the global dairy market, which stakeholders will closely monitor.
Ireland dairy farms, milk production increase, European dairy industry, sustainable farming strategies, high-quality milk

Ireland’s dairy farms are making waves across Europe. In November 2024, they produced 510 million liters of milk, smashing previous records. This 34% increase over the prior year, 2023, is a testament to the resilience and adaptability of Irish dairy farmers, and it has drawn attention in the dairy world.

What’s Behind the Surge?

In 2023, it was tough for Irish dairy farmers. Lousy weather in late 2023 led to a 21% drop in milk production. But now, things have changed dramatically. Here’s why:

  1. Weather Shift: The bad weather lasted into early 2024, pushing the usual spring milk boost to later in the year.
  2. Increased Profits: Farmers earn more for their milk while reducing feed expenses.
  3. Encouragement from Irish dairy companies: Farmers are urged to increase production, with some even importing cows from Northern Ireland.

 “This significant increase in Irish milk production could impact the operations of the European dairy industry,” states Dr. Emma O’Sullivan, a dairy expert. The surge in production could lead to increased competition, potentially affecting prices and market dynamics across Europe.

Not Just More, But Better

Irish cows aren’t just producing more milk – it’s high-quality stuff, too. In November 2024:

  • Fat content was 4.99%
  • Protein content was 3.98%

These numbers are significantly higher than those produced by U.S. cows.

Europe-Wide Growth

Ireland isn’t the only country seeing more milk. Here’s how other European countries did:

CountryProduction IncreaseFat ContentProtein Content
Ireland34.0%4.99%3.98%
Poland3.9%4.20%3.40%
France1.8%4.15%3.35%
Italy1.5%4.10%3.30%
Spain0.9%4.05%3.25%
Germany-1.9%4.18%3.38%
Netherlands-0.4%4.22%3.42%

Some countries, like Germany and the Netherlands, saw small drops. But overall, Europe produced 1.8% more milk than in November 2023.

What This Means for Dairy Farmers

The Implications of the Rise in Milk Production for Farmers Worldwide

“We might see more competition in the global market,” says Michael O’Connor, an economist who studies the dairy industry.

Looking to the Future

With increased milk production, several outcomes may arise:

  1. Milk Prices: Prices might decrease initially because more milk is available.
  2. Selling to Other Countries: European farmers might be able to sell more milk to countries in Asia and Africa.
  3. Farming Practices: Farmers might need to find new ways to produce milk that is good for the environment.

Dr. O’Sullivan emphasizes the importance of Irish dairy farmers strategizing for sustainable long-term farm growth. This is not just a choice but a responsibility that we all share in preserving our environment and ensuring the future of our industry.

The Bottom Line

The Irish dairy industry is showing that it can recover from past challenges. As things change, farmers, dairy companies, and government officials must work together to keep the industry strong.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Bluetongue Virus Hits 9,044 French Farms: Impact on Dairy Industry

Explore the impact of France’s bluetongue outbreak on dairy farms. Can farmers overcome it? Learn about control efforts and regional effects.

Summary:

France is grappling with a formidable challenge as it fights an outbreak of the bluetongue virus, impacting over 9,000 farms across 52 of its 101 regions, with a stronghold in the northeastern areas near Belgium. This situation endangers the nation’s livestock stability, complicated further by concurrent epizootic hemorrhagic disease (EHD) cases. French authorities have initiated a comprehensive vaccination campaign, yet the swift spread of bluetongue virus serotype 3 remains a critical risk to dairy production and animal welfare. “The French Ministry of Agriculture has responded with urgent containment measures to address the bluetongue virus spread, emphasizing the critical need for effective disease management amid growing concerns,” states an industry expert. The ongoing spread calls for ongoing adaptation as France’s dairy industry confronts these dual threats, amid broader European epidemics and climate-related hurdles.

Key Takeaways:

  • France faces a significant outbreak of bluetongue virus, affecting over 9,000 farms and extending across 52 departments.
  • EHD infections pose additional threats to livestock, complicating the situation further with over 3,500 cases reported.
  • The northeastern regions bordering Belgium and southern areas near Spain are identified as major hotspots.
  • Efficacious control measures implemented include vaccination, emergency vaccine approvals, and movement restrictions.
  • Livestock farmers experience substantial challenges including high fever, reduced milk production, and potential fatalities in affected animals.
  • This epidemic is part of a broader European issue with neighboring nations experiencing similar outbreaks.
  • Continued vigilance and adaptive strategies are crucial to mitigate current losses and prepare for future outbreaks.
bluetongue virus, French agriculture, European dairy industry, livestock health, dairy production, Culicoides midges, veterinary care costs, vaccination campaigns, outbreak control measures, animal health impacts

Picture waking up to the sight of your once-thriving dairy farm being ravaged by a virus smaller than a grain of sand. This is the harsh reality for many farmers in France as the bluetongue virus spreads rapidly across the nation. With over 9,044 farms affected and the virus now present in 52 of the 101 regions, urgent action is imperative due to the escalating threat to livestock health and the dairy industry’s stability. 

“It’s like watching our livelihood slip away,” says a farmer from northeast France, where the outbreak is worst.

This outbreak is a major threat to French agriculture and the European dairy industry. The virus’s rapid spread endangers livestock health and dairy production, requiring urgent attention and action. 

  • Extent of Outbreak: Affects 9,044 farms.
  • Geographical Impact: Found in 52 of 101 regions.
  • Hotspot: Northeast France, near Belgium.

Bluetongue Virus Strikes France: A Dual Threat to Livestock Industry 

The bluetongue virus (BTV) is a viral disease that affects animals like sheep, goats, and cattle. It spreads through bites from Culicoides midges, which have a broad reach and challenging control. Infected livestock may experience fever, swollen heads, and mouth ulcers. BTV can cause a sharp drop in milk production for dairy cows, hitting the dairy industry hard. 

EHD, another disease spread by midges, adds to the problems by causing cattle fever and swelling. BTV and EHD are serious threats to livestock in France, and more efforts are needed to control them. These diseases significantly affect animal health, often leading to high fevers, mouth ulcers, and severe breathing issues. For example, the bluetongue virus can cause a significant drop in milk production, leaving dairy farmers struggling to meet demands. The French Ministry of Agriculture reports that outbreaks have led to a 20% reduction in milk yield on affected farms. Financially, the burden is heavy. Farmers face the direct costs of veterinary care and treatment and lose income due to lower productivity. A report noted that farmers had extra expenses of about €5,000 to €10,000 per farm in vet costs alone during past outbreaks. This establishes a challenging cycle where reduced production exacerbates the economic pressure on farmers as they strive to maintain their businesses amid the damage caused by the disease.

The surge of bluetongue cases in France’s northeastern regions is alarming. With over 9,000 cases reported this year, the outbreak’s severity is a cause for concern, especially for the dairy industry. The bluetongue virus is spreading rapidly in France, with 9,044 cases reported this year in 52 out of 101 regions. The northeastern areas near Belgium are the most brutal hit. This highlights concerns about the virus potentially crossing borders through infected insects or animals, complicating containment efforts and emphasizing the critical need for international coordination.

Severe Bluetongue Outbreak Threatens Dairy Industry’s Stability and Output

The bluetongue outbreak in France significantly impacts the dairy industry, leading to severe repercussions for production and economic stability. Dairy cattle are susceptible to the disease and show symptoms like high fevers and mouth ulcers. Nevertheless, the most substantial effect is the decrease in milk production, which directly impacts the industry’s fundamental operations. 

For dairy farmers, less milk means less income. Daily financial pressures increase as they must cover additional veterinary care costs while coping with reduced productivity. For instance, a farmer in the worst-hit region of northeast France has seen a 30% drop in milk production, leading to a significant decrease in income. This also affects the industry, disrupting supply chains and possibly causing price changes. 

Diminished supplies may influence the market presence of dairy and milk processors. This situation highlights how a biological threat can evolve into a complex economic issue. 

Experts warn of long-term impacts if control measures aren’t effective. These could include a prolonged decrease in livestock productivity, increased vet costs, and potential changes in market dynamics. While vaccine efforts offer some hope, recovery for farmers and the industry could be challenging and lengthy. This underscores the importance of proactive measures and ongoing vigilance.

France’s Strategic Response: Combating Bluetongue Virus with Swift Actions

The French authorities are actively tackling the bluetongue outbreak with focused control measures to protect the livestock industry: 

  • Vaccination Campaigns: France distributes 6.4 million vaccine doses, prioritizing high-risk livestock. Rapid vaccination is crucial to stop the virus spread, especially in remote areas.
  • Movement Restrictions: Zones are set up to limit animal movement in affected regions. Enforcing the rules is challenging, and the economic impact on farmers is significant.
  • Emergency Vaccine Approval: While approving vaccines like BULTAVO 3 and BLUEVAC-3 helps, availability and effectiveness against this bluetongue strain are key concerns.

These strategies rely on quick action and cooperation among the government, veterinarians, and farmers to stabilize France’s dairy industry amid the ongoing outbreak. 

The regional epidemic of bluetongue and EHD in Europe underscores the need for a unified response. The outbreaks in France and similar patterns in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and Luxembourg highlight the importance of international cooperation in combating these diseases. France’s bluetongue and EHD outbreaks are part of a larger European epidemic affecting several countries. Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and Luxembourg report increased BTV-3 cases, showing a similar pattern. This spread suggests environmental or migratory factors potentially linked to favorable climate conditions for disease vectors. Spain and Portugal are also facing EHDV-8 outbreaks, highlighting the persistent presence of these pathogens across Western Europe. 

This widespread epidemic complicates control efforts because trade and livestock movement increase cross-border transmission risks. Measures like movement restrictions and vaccinations face logistical challenges and need international cooperation. Differences in readiness among countries can create gaps for disease spread, causing ongoing outbreaks. 

Mild winters and warm summers in Europe likely extend active periods for disease vectors, worsening outbreaks. Climate changes could further affect vector behavior, requiring adaptive strategies. To control bluetongue and EHD in Europe, a multifaceted response with better surveillance, shared resources, and unified policies is essential.

Adaptation and Resilience: Navigating France’s Dairy Crisis Amid Disease and Climate Challenges

The concurrent outbreaks of bluetongue and EHD present significant challenges for France’s dairy sector. Many animals, especially in new outbreak zones, have never encountered BTV-3, increasing the risk of widespread, severe infections. This complicates control efforts and worsens the economic impact

Climate plays a crucial role in the spread of these diseases. Mild winters and warm summers create perfect conditions for disease-carrying midges. This means more frequent outbreaks, challenging established agricultural routines. 

If not addressed, these outbreaks might cause prolonged decreases in livestock productivity, affecting milk yield and quality and putting farmers under economic strain. Proactive measures like vaccinations, international cooperation, and climate adaptation strategies are vital. 

The French government and agriculture organizations must improve disease monitoring and explore novel solutions to make livestock more resilient. The future of French dairy farming hinges on this adaptability and commitment to sustainable approaches.

The Bottom Line

France is experiencing a significant bluetongue virus outbreak, with over 9,000 cases hitting the northeastern regions hardest. The presence of EHD adds to the urgency of ongoing vigilance and effective action from authorities and dairy farmers. Implementing comprehensive vaccination campaigns and stringent movement controls is essential in containing the bluetongue virus outbreak and safeguarding the dairy industry from further devastation. 

This situation demands unity and increased awareness in the industry. We invite you to share your successful approaches to managing outbreaks and strategies for combating agricultural threats. Your valuable insights can inspire and guide others in navigating similar challenges effectively. Whether it’s a successful vaccination campaign or a unique approach to movement controls, your experiences can help others in the community. Staying informed and actively participating in discussions are crucial for keeping up with developments and collaboratively tackling the challenges presented by agricultural crises. Together, the dairy community can build resilience and protect livestock health. 

What do you think of the current strategies? Have you faced similar situations, and what did you do? 

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend