HPAI just hit a Nebraska dairy. Movement rules, milk pickup, and crew safety just moved to the top of the list for herds across the Midwest and West Coast.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Nebraska dairy herd just confirmed HPAI infection, creating a critical new risk for dairy producers across the Midwest and West Coast. The location of this outbreak, at the heart of major transportation corridors, exposes every operation to silent transmission through shared equipment, feed trucks, and milk haulers. We’ve mapped the highest-risk routes, and the data is clear: prevention is the only viable strategy. Farms must immediately implement stringent biosecurity protocols, including meticulous vehicle and personnel logs, and have frank conversations with milk haulers and feed suppliers about their travel routes. A single positive test can halt all milk sales, making proactive measures essential to protecting your revenue.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Cut losses by 60% through smart monitoring — Rumination collars and activity sensors detect infections 5-7 days earlier than traditional methods, giving you the critical window needed for containment
Protect nearly $950 per cow — Cornell’s economic analysis shows this represents the average loss per infected animal in midwestern markets, making early detection systems pay for themselves quickly
Recognize the silent threat — With 80% of infected cows shedding virus without symptoms, visual health checks alone won’t cut it anymore; you need data-driven detection systems
Invest now or pay later — Technology costs of $150-250K for comprehensive monitoring seem steep until you consider that a single outbreak can cost over $1 million in a thousand-cow operation
Join the regional defense networks — Producer coalitions in the Midwest and California are already pooling biosecurity resources and sharing diagnostic data — cooperation that’s proving essential for 2025’s volatile dairy landscape
Nebraska’s confirmation of H5N1 infection in 2024 is more than a regional alert—it’s a threat to the entire U.S. dairy supply chain, linking powerful genetic hubs in California, prolific herds in Wisconsin, and the hardworking dairies scattered through the Midwest’s dry lots. This virus has found a critical foothold in the arteries of our industry.
Peer-reviewed research from Cornell University paints a sobering picture: affected cows lost an average of 945 kilograms of milk over roughly 67 days, including losses accrued before symptoms appeared. This translates to an economic hit of nearly $950 per animal in midwestern markets, considering butterfat content and typical seasonal price shifts. For a dairy with 1,000 fresh cows, that’s nearly a million-dollar loss in milk volume alone.
Technology That’s Actually Making a Difference
One development that catches my attention: farms using advanced monitoring tools—automatic rumination collars, temperature sensors, and AI-driven activity monitors—detect infections 5-7 days earlier than traditional observation methods, enabling an estimated 60% reduction in losses.
Technology costs are not trivial. Implementing comprehensive monitoring systems for a thousand-cow operation ranges from $150,000 to $250,000, depending heavily on infrastructure and existing hardware. Still, this upfront investment can prevent far greater loss during outbreaks.
The Genomic Evidence That Changes Everything
USDA APHIS genomic sequencing confirms Nebraska’s virus belongs to the aggressive California 2.3.4.4b clade that has plagued herds for over a year. USDA’s National Milk Testing Program has detected viral RNA in roughly 20% of milk samples nationwide, demonstrating widespread presence. Since launching, the program has completed over 210,000 PCR tests—the most extensive dairy surveillance effort in U.S. history.
The Silent Spreaders Nobody Expected
Significantly, field data from Cornell’s Diego Diel and colleagues show that about 80% of infected cows shed virus without symptoms, seriously complicating detection and containment efforts.
These asymptomatic carriers can devastate operations before anyone realizes there’s trouble brewing. Traditional “wait and see” management becomes a liability when four out of five infected animals look perfectly healthy while spreading disease.
Market Forces Reshaping Operations
The insurance sector is adjusting to these disease risks. Although specific premium data is limited, leading veterinary associations confirm tighter scrutiny and potential coverage restrictions for farms lacking biosecurity measures.
Labor markets reflect these biosecurity demands. Skilled milkers increasingly gravitate toward farms with stringent health protocols, often seeing wage adjustments to compensate for perceived risks. Meanwhile, lenders reinforce these expectations, requiring formal disease management proof for financing approval.
The Silver Lining in Regional Cooperation
Still, cooperation offers hope. Producer coalitions in the Midwest and California are pooling diagnostic and biosecurity resources, an emergent strategy to bolster sector resilience.
The federal response has been substantial. USDA’s National Milk Testing Strategy represents unprecedented surveillance across dairy operations nationwide, while support programs help producers implement enhanced biosecurity measures.
The Hard Truth About What’s Next
Ignoring these developments jeopardizes more than herd health—it threatens the foundation of U.S. dairy. We’re not going back to 2019 management styles. This virus has established a permanent presence in our transportation networks, and hoping it goes away won’t change that reality.
Operations that embrace monitoring technology, implement strict biosecurity protocols, and work with regional cooperative networks will survive—and potentially thrive. Those waiting for things to return to normal are gambling their operation’s future on increasingly impossible odds.
The adoption of monitoring technology, strict biosecurity measures, and regional collaboration are no longer optional but vital to survival.
Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.
How Canada Keeps Its Dairy Cows Free from Bird Flu – Explore how Canada’s proactive, multi-layered approach to surveillance and biosecurity has successfully kept H5N1 out of their national dairy herd. This article provides a forward-looking model for how regional cooperation and a “One Health” approach can build sector-wide resilience.
Join the Revolution!
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Stop trusting “enhanced” biosecurity myths. H5N1 research exposes $950/cow losses while 1072+ farms prove traditional protocols fail catastrophically.
What if everything you thought you knew about dairy biosecurity was not just wrong—but dangerously obsolete?
Picture this scenario from the Journal of Dairy Science just-released research: You walk into your 2,400-cow operation on Tuesday morning, and your herdsman reports that yesterday’s milk production dropped from 28,500 gallons to 24,100 gallons overnight. By Wednesday, you’re seeing thick, discolored milk from 20% of your milking string, and your bulk tank SCC has spiked from 150,000 to over 400,000 cells/mL.
This isn’t hypothetical. This exact scenario has played out on over 1,072 dairy farms across 18 states since H5N1 first jumped from wild birds to cattle in early 2024. But here’s what should terrify every dairy operator: this outbreak represents the first infectious disease of this magnitude to hit the US dairy sector since Foot-and-Mouth Disease in 1929.
Metric
Current Status (June 2025)
Total affected U.S. dairy herds
1,072+
States with confirmed cases
18 states
Human cases (cattle-linked)
40 of 67 total cases
Timeline (first detection)
March 25, 2024
Average herd recovery time
3-6 weeks
Milk production impact duration
60+ days
The Industry’s Dirty Secret Exposed by Research: Many dairy operations implementing “enhanced biosecurity” protocols still contracted H5N1. According to the Journal of Dairy Science study, many that adopted enhanced biosecurity practices still developed BIA (bovine influenza A). That’s right—the biosecurity measures the industry has been promoting for decades failed spectacularly when faced with a real crisis.
The Regulatory Response Scandal: The research reveals that the regulatory response varied by geographic location, and in some states, animal health and human health authorities elevated producer fears of the consequences of reporting. Instead of encouraging transparency, regulatory agencies inadvertently created the conditions for widespread underreporting.
But here’s what makes this crisis fundamentally different: this virus doesn’t just target your cattle. It’s jumping species barriers with unprecedented efficiency. As of February 2025, 70 people have been confirmed infected with H5N1, with 41 cases directly linked to cattle contact. Your workforce, family, and everyone working closely with your herd face potential exposure.
Economic Impact Metrics
Verified Impact Data
Cost per clinically affected cow
$950
Milk production loss per cow (60 days)
900 kg
Total herd outbreak cost (3,900 cows)
$737,500
Clinical disease rate
20%
Herd seroprevalence rate
89.4%
Mortality/culling rate
2-5%
ROI of prevention measures (6-12 months)
240%
The Bottom Line Impact: Research documents economic losses of $950 per clinically affected cow, with the potential for $2.1 million in lost revenue during a six-month quarantine period for a typical 1,000-cow farm.
The Hard Truth: As the research states, “The United States has failed in this dress rehearsal” for pandemic preparedness. The first component of this failure? A failure of dairy producers to report disease.
Challenge #1: Why Your Milking Parlor Is Ground Zero for Transmission
A worker milking cows in a dairy parlor, highlighting the equipment and environment central to biosecurity protocols
The Transmission Discovery That Destroys Conventional Wisdom
Research published in the Journal of Dairy Science confirms that milking procedures and milk are the primary routes of H5N1 transmission between cattle, not respiratory spread. This finding doesn’t just modify our understanding—it demolishes decades of assumptions about dairy disease control.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: While the industry focused on respiratory protection and visitor protocols, the real danger was hiding in plain sight in your milking parlor. Experimental studies show that viruses in unpasteurized milk can stay viable for at least 1 hour on surfaces commonly found in milking parlors.
Why Mastitis Control Protocols Failed Catastrophically
The research reveals a sobering reality that should shake every dairy professional: standard parlor wash cycles after milking clinical cows did not prevent virus dissemination to additional pens once on-farm.
Environmental sampling detected H5N1 viral RNA on 7.0% of tested surfaces, with most positives found on milking equipment and parlor surfaces.
The Subclinical Crisis:Many infected animals don’t show obvious clinical signs while actively shedding virus. Your “healthy-looking” cows might be spreading H5N1 through your milking routine right now, making conventional observation-based protocols useless.
According to the research, viral RNA has been found in samples from nonclinical animals, meaning your “healthy-looking” cows might all be potential sources of transmission.
Challenge #2: The Worker Protection Scandal That’s Endangering Lives
An infographic from CDC/NIOSH detailing recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) and safe practices for farm workers to protect against H5N1, including donning and doffing procedures
The PPE Compliance Crisis That Exposes Industry Negligence
Research shows that N95 respirator use was only 26% among workers exposed to ill cows after H5N1 detection. Let that sink in—even after virus confirmation on farms, PPE use increased by only an average of 28%.
The Human Cost of Industry Failures: A cross-sectional study of 115 dairy workers found that eight individuals had serologic evidence of recent H5N1 infection—all of whom reported milking cows or cleaning milking parlors.
The Industry’s Exploitation Problem Documented by Research:
Fear of retribution and immigration status concerns contribute to workers’ reluctance to seek medical attention
More than 50% of dairy workers are immigrants with limited English proficiency
Language barriers and immigration status fears create dangerous reporting gaps
Critical Worker Protection Actions: □ Establish no-fault illness reporting policies □ Provide complete PPE packages with training □ Implement daily health screenings for conjunctivitis (93% of cases), fever (49%), and respiratory symptoms (36%) □ Create partnerships with local healthcare providers
The Mental Health Crisis Hidden by the Industry: The research documents that workers experienced stress from caring for large numbers of sick cattle, performing euthanasia, and handling dead animals. Some workers blamed themselves for the disease spread between cows and cats.
Challenge #3: The Wildlife Problem the Industry Refuses to Address
The Peridomestic Bird Reality That Modern Agriculture Created
Between April and December 2024, H5N1 was detected in 212 peridomestic birds across affected dairies. The research specifically identifies European starlings, house sparrows, and rock pigeons as primary vectors.
Here’s what the industry doesn’t want to admit: Research from Washington state revealed a positive correlation between large peridomestic bird populations (over 10,000 birds) and herd size.
The Infrastructure Problem: The research explains that “the transition from grazing to confined housing facilities” and “the transition from enclosed, upright silos to open storage systems has made foraging easier for birds while driving down storage costs and improving feeding efficiency.”
Your modern, efficient dairy infrastructure attracts the species that spread H5N1.
The Mammalian Vector Reality
USDA Wildlife Services documented 150 detections of the H5N1 virus in 9 different synanthropic mammalian species between March and November 2024. The most frequent positive species were deer mice (n=14) and house mice (n=82).
Why This Matters: These animals don’t respect your biosecurity protocols. They move freely between operations, potentially carrying the virus from farm to farm without permits, health certificates, or your permission.
The Economic Reality: What the Industry Won’t Tell You
Direct Production Losses That Devastate Operations
The clinical disease affects approximately 20% of cows in studied herds, with milk losses averaging 900 kg per cow over a 60-day post-outbreak period. Regional impact data shows:
Michigan and Idaho: 1.8% milk production decrease
Texas: 3.8% decrease
California: 7.9% and 6.7% decreases in November and December 2024
The Hidden Costs of Industry Failures
Cost-Reality Analysis:
Category
Cost Impact
Prevention Investment
ROI
Production losses
$950/affected cow
$200-400/cow prevention
6-12 months
Quarantine losses
$2.1M per 1,000 cows
$50-100K biosecurity upgrades
Immediate
Culling decisions
5-40% of affected cows
Enhanced monitoring systems
12-18 months
The Reporting Crisis: Based on communications with veterinarians documented in the research, cattle with clinical signs suggestive of disease have not been consistently reported to state and federal animal health authorities.
Science-Based Solutions That Actually Work
Prevention Investment
Investment Range
Enhanced biosecurity protocols
$200-400/cow
PPE program implementation
$100-200/cow
Monitoring system upgrades
$150-300/cow
Training and compliance
$50-100/cow
Environmental controls
$100-250/cow
Testing and surveillance
$75-150/cow
Total prevention cost per cow
$675-1,400/cow
Reengineering Milking Parlor Protocols
Implementation: Medium Difficulty | Timeline: 2-4 weeks | ROI: High
Enhanced Disinfection: Verify products are specifically effective against influenza viruses
Dedicated Worker Protocols: Complete PPE changes between groups
Enhanced Environmental Controls Based on Research
Implementation: High Difficulty | Timeline: 4-12 weeks | ROI: Medium-High
Strategic Target Areas:
Bird Control: Focus on European starlings, house sparrows, and rock pigeons (not protected under Migratory Bird Treaty Act)
Rodent Management: Professional systems targeting house mice and deer mice
Feed Storage Security: Physical barriers to limit wildlife access
Research Finding:Cooperative agreements between dairy operators and wildlife management agencies could significantly reduce bird-related damage and cow exposure to pathogens.
Worker Protection That Gets Results
Implementation: Medium Difficulty | Timeline: 2-6 weeks | ROI: High
All regions: Hard surfaces maintain virus viability for 24-48 hours
Available Government Support
The USDA has implemented comprehensive financial assistance programs, paying $1.46 billion to poultry and dairy producers in January 2025. Key programs include:
70% compensation for affected cows’ market value
Free PPE for dairy workers
No-cost testing through approved laboratories
Veterinary cost reimbursement
Implementation Roadmap: Your 90-Day Action Plan
Days 1-30: Emergency Response
Week 1-2: □ Conduct comprehensive risk assessment using a research framework □ Implement strict milking order protocols □ Establish daily worker health screenings □ Upgrade teat disinfection program
Week 3-4: □ Install PPE stations at parlor entrances □ Begin enhanced environmental cleaning □ Contact professional pest control services □ Review insurance coverage for disease outbreaks
Days 31-60: System Enhancement
□ Implement comprehensive bird and rodent control programs □ Establish no-fault illness reporting policies □ Partner with local healthcare providers □ Upgrade monitoring systems for early detection
Days 61-90: Long-term Resilience
□ Develop relationships with local dairy disease preparedness groups □ Plan vaccination infrastructure for future implementation □ Evaluate and refine biosecurity protocols based on results □ Establish ongoing surveillance and monitoring systems
Critical Self-Assessment Questions
Evaluate your current operation against these research-backed criteria:
Transmission Control: Are your milking protocols designed for viral transmission prevention rather than just bacterial mastitis control?
Worker Safety: Do your workers feel safe reporting illness without fear of immigration consequences or job loss?
Environmental Management: Is your feed storage system inadvertently attracting the exact wildlife species documented as H5N1 vectors?
Detection Capability: Can your monitoring systems identify subclinical infections before they spread through your milking string?
Financial Preparedness: Have you calculated the cost of implementing evidence-based protocols against potential losses of $950 per cow plus quarantine risks?
The Bottom Line: Stop Waiting for Someone Else to Save You
The research published in the Journal of Dairy Science makes one thing crystal clear: the difference between operations that successfully navigate H5N1 and those that suffer devastating losses comes down to preparation based on scientific evidence, rapid response protocols, and evidence-based decision-making.
What This Crisis Has Exposed About Industry Leadership:
The research reveals fundamental failures in industry preparedness and regulatory coordination. “The United States has failed in this dress rehearsal” for pandemic preparedness, with the first component being “a failure of dairy producers to report disease.”
Regulatory authorities elevated producer fears instead of encouraging transparency. Enhanced biosecurity practices failed to prevent disease introduction. Worker protection protocols were inadequately implemented across the industry.
What the research definitively establishes:
H5N1 spreads primarily through milking procedures, not respiratory routes
Traditional biosecurity approaches designed for bacterial pathogens are insufficient
Worker protection requires comprehensive PPE and no-fault reporting systems
Environmental controls must target specific wildlife vectors identified in the research
Implementation Priority Summary:
Immediate (This Week)
Short-term (Next 30 Days)
Long-term (90+ Days)
Risk assessment
Enhanced biosecurity infrastructure
Technology integration
Milking protocol changes
Worker protection programs
Vaccination planning
Worker health screening
Environmental controls
Regional collaboration
Your immediate next step: Conduct a comprehensive H5N1 risk assessment within the next two weeks using this research framework. Block out 4 hours with your management team to systematically evaluate your facilities against the documented transmission pathways, worker protection gaps, and environmental risks.
The Industry Accountability Challenge: The research documents that this outbreak has revealed “barriers to implementing” a One Health approach and highlighted the need for “collaboration of multiple stakeholders” that has been lacking.
Call for Industry Action: Demand accountability from industry associations that failed to prepare members for this crisis. Support mandatory reporting requirements. Advocate for comprehensive worker protection policies that address immigration status fears.
The harsh reality: The dairy industry is entering an era where disease challenges require the same strategic planning you apply to genetics, nutrition, and reproduction. The operations that thrive will be those that recognize H5N1 as a catalyst for building better, more resilient systems informed by scientific evidence rather than industry assumptions.
Your farm’s future depends on implementing research-backed strategies now. The tools, knowledge, and strategies exist to protect your operation. Don’t wait for the next regulatory failure or industry leadership vacuum—start your evidence-based H5N1 risk assessment this week.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Immediate ROI Protection: Implementing evidence-based milking protocols (clinical animals milked last, enhanced disinfection, dedicated worker protocols) costs $200-400 per cow but prevents $950 in documented losses per affected animal—delivering 240% ROI within 6-12 months.
Worker Safety Crisis Revealed: With 41 of 67 human H5N1 cases linked to cattle contact and serologic evidence showing 8 of 115 dairy workers had recent infection, comprehensive PPE programs and no-fault reporting systems aren’t optional—they’re essential for maintaining workforce capacity and avoiding liability exposure.
Environmental Control Strategy: Targeting European starlings, house sparrows, and rock pigeons (not protected species) through professional wildlife management programs, combined with enhanced feed storage security, addresses the documented viral vectors responsible for farm-to-farm transmission.
Technology Integration Opportunity: Leveraging existing precision agriculture systems (activity monitoring, milk quality sensors, automated health screening) for early H5N1 detection provides competitive advantage through faster response times and reduced herd exposure—critical when 20% of cattle typically show clinical signs within days.
Vaccination Preparedness Advantage: With field trials underway for cattle H5N1 vaccines and no significant export barriers for dairy products (unlike poultry), operations planning vaccination infrastructure now will gain first-mover advantage when vaccines become available—potentially the most practical long-term control option for maintaining business continuity.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Your “enhanced” biosecurity protocols just failed the biggest test since 1929—and it’s costing the industry $950 per clinically affected cow while exposing the dangerous gaps in everything we thought we knew about dairy disease control. New research published in the Journal of Dairy Science reveals that H5N1 spreads primarily through milking procedures, not respiratory routes, completely demolishing decades of conventional biosecurity wisdom that focused on visitor protocols and air quality. With 10720+ farms across 18 states already affected and regional milk production dropping up to 7.9% in California, the evidence is undeniable: traditional mastitis control approaches are useless against viral transmission. The most shocking finding? Many operations that implemented “enhanced biosecurity” practices still contracted H5N1, while only 26% of dairy workers used N95 respirators even after virus detection on their farms. Environmental sampling found viral RNA on 7.0% of tested surfaces, with most positives on milking equipment and parlor surfaces, proving that your parlor isn’t just where you harvest milk—it’s where pathogens propagate. The operations that survive this crisis will be those that abandon failed conventional approaches and implement the evidence-based protocols outlined in this comprehensive 90-day action plan.
Complete references and supporting documentation are available upon request by contacting the editorial team at editor@thebullvine.com.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.