Every Memorial Day, dairy farmers watch millions of gallons of milk get dumped while processors fail at basic demand forecasting. Here’s why.

While planning your Memorial Day barbecue, dairy processors are quietly orchestrating one of agriculture’s most predictable disasters—dumping millions of gallons of fresh milk because they can’t figure out what consumers want during holiday weekends. This isn’t just waste; it’s a systemic failure that’s bankrupting farms and exposing the dairy industry’s shocking inability to manage the most basic supply-and-demand equation in agriculture.

Here’s a truth that’ll ruin your holiday weekend: every Memorial Day, while Americans fire up their grills expecting abundant dairy products for their spreads, dairy farmers across the nation watch their life’s work literally flow down the drain.

We’re talking about millions of gallons of perfectly good milk being dumped because processors can’t seem to master the art of predicting what people want to eat during a three-day weekend.

Sound ridiculous? It is. And it’s been happening for decades.

But here’s the question nobody wants to ask: Why are we still accepting this annual disaster as inevitable when the technology exists to fix it?

It’s like having a perfect breeding program consistently producing high-quality heifers, only to watch the market crash every time they’re ready to freshen. Except this market crash happens on schedule every year, and we keep acting surprised.

The Spring Flush Reality Check: When Biology Exposes Industry Incompetence

Let’s start with some basic dairy science that apparently escapes our processing giants. Every dairy farmer knows the spring flush as intimately as they know their own herd’s lactation curves.

This predictable surge when your cows hit peak production between March and May isn’t some mysterious agricultural phenomenon—it’s basic bovine biology that’s been documented longer than we’ve had Holstein registration papers.

The 2024 numbers tell the real story. Last year’s spring flush perfectly illustrated the crisis we’re facing again this Memorial Day weekend. According to USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service, February 2024 saw U.S. milk production jump 2.4% from February 2023 to 17.4 billion pounds. Even accounting for the leap year, this represented significant seasonal pressure on processing systems.

But here’s what the year-over-year comparisons miss: the biological reality of spring flush continues to create predictable 6-7% surges over fall production levels, regardless of whether annual totals are up or down. Your cows don’t care about market trends—they’re doing exactly what decades of genetic selection have programmed them to do: converting spring pastures and optimal body condition into maximum milk yield.

With the U.S. dairy herd at 9.245 million head as of April 2025, the sheer volume during peak production periods overwhelms processing capacity designed for average daily volumes. The spring concentration creates the same dumping crisis even when production shows modest declines.

Yet somehow, this entirely predictable biological peak catches processors off guard year after year, like a first-time farmer surprised that calves need colostrum.

Professor Jared Hutchins from the University of Illinois captured the farmer’s impossible position perfectly: “If your buyer says they have enough and don’t need anymore, you can’t go to your cows and say, ‘Hey, girls, you know, we have enough milk, you can stop producing now.'”

Here’s the brutal reality: Unlike a corn farmer who can choose when to plant or a feedlot operator who can adjust cattle purchases, dairy farmers are locked into a biological production cycle that doesn’t pause for market volatility.

Your cows don’t read commodity reports or adjust their output based on Memorial Day weekend forecasts.

So why is this our problem to solve instead of theirs?

The $47 Million Smokescreen: Follow the Money Trail

Let’s cut through the industry spin about that “$47 million Memorial Day loss” figure that’s been circulating like a bad case of mastitis through industry circles.

That number isn’t actually from milk dumping—it represents the USDA’s abrupt termination of Local Food Purchase Assistance funding in California. But here’s why this matters: it demonstrates just how financially precarious our sector has become that processors use policy funding cuts to deflect attention from their operational failures.

The real dumping numbers tell a more disturbing story. During peak periods, U.S. farmers are forced to dispose of up to 3.7 million gallons of milk daily—that’s equivalent to dumping the entire daily production of roughly 370 average-sized dairy operations.

Just last year, Upper Midwest farmers dumped up to 350,000 gallons per day during spring flush periods, and this Memorial Day weekend threatens a repeat performance.

Think about that math for a moment. A typical operation producing about 8.1 gallons per cow per day sees their entire day’s work—equivalent to filling 1,120 standard milk jugs—poured onto the ground because processing plants operating at capacity couldn’t handle the spring surge they knew was coming.

Question for the room: If we can predict calving dates nine months in advance and forecast feed needs for the entire lactation, why can’t processors handle a production surge that happens every single spring?

Real Farmers, Real Fury: The Human Cost of Corporate Failure

Mitch Thompson’s reaction to watching his milk dumped? “A real kick in the shorts”—Minnesota nice for “this is absolutely infuriating.”

Thompson ships around 70,000 pounds daily from his Lewiston operation, milk that meets all quality standards and represents the culmination of careful breeding, nutrition management, and herd health protocols.

Yet haulers picked up his milk only to dump it in a neighboring field because regional processing capacity was maxed out.

Sarah Schmidt from Associated Milk Producers Inc. (AMPI) confirmed what many cooperative members already know: during peak periods, milk from member farms regularly exceeds processing and marketing capacity.

It’s like having a perfectly timed breeding program where all your heifers freshen at optimal body condition, only to discover the maternity barn is full, and you have nowhere to put them.

The 2024 spring flush brought this crisis into sharp focus. With processing bottlenecks forcing producers to discard milk, and a new processing capacity of $8 billion coming online in 2025 that still won’t address seasonal surge management, the structural problems become even more obvious.

Let that sink in: facilities designed to process milk for a living that can’t handle the milk they’re supposed to process.

Why are we tolerating this level of operational incompetence from the companies we depend on to market our product?

The Financial Bloodbath Behind Federal Band-Aids

Here’s what should make every dairy farmer’s blood pressure spike like a cow with milk fever: this crisis unfolds against a backdrop of chronically negative dairy economics.

Over the past decade, the average dairy farm net income was negative in all but one year—imagine running a breeding program where only one out of ten bulls actually improve your herd.

During COVID-19, Class I milk prices collapsed from $19.01 per hundredweight in January 2020 to $11.42 per hundredweight by June—a price drop equivalent to losing $760 in revenue per cow annually based on average production.

Pennsylvania dairy producers alone faced potential monthly losses of $25.2 million, translating to nearly $40,000 per farm.

Here’s how the Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system handles dumping: When milk gets dumped, it’s “pooled” at the lowest class price, with the financial burden spread across all producers in the order.

According to NC State Extension, “The dumped milk will be allowed to be priced and pooled on the FMMO. The FMMO draw will not make any pooling handler or dairy farmer whole but will provide nominal financial assistance.”

It’s like having your neighbor’s mastitis outbreak affect your milk check because you’re both in the same cooperative—everyone pays for systemic failures, but nobody fixes the system that creates them.

Here’s the math that should enrage you: When your milk gets pooled at Class IV prices (currently around $11-12 per hundredweight) instead of Class I prices (typically $18-20 per hundredweight), you’re losing $6-8 per hundredweight.

For a 1,000-cow herd producing 70 pounds per cow daily, that’s a daily revenue loss of $4,200-$5,600 during dumping events.

Question: Why are we subsidizing processor incompetence through our own milk checks?

The Perfect Storm: Four Systemic Failures That Guarantee Crisis

Beyond basic forecasting incompetence, four interconnected vulnerabilities transform manageable seasonal surges into annual disasters. Understanding these failure points reveals why the Memorial Day crisis isn’t just predictable—systemic design flaws engineer it.

The Perishability Trap: Racing Against Biology

Raw milk isn’t corn or soybeans that you can store in bins until market conditions improve. Unlike virtually every other agricultural commodity, milk has a biological countdown timer that starts ticking the moment it leaves the cow. You’ve got roughly 72 hours from production to processing before quality deterioration makes it unsuitable for fluid consumption.

This perishability creates what economists call “distressed inventory”—product that must be sold or disposed of regardless of market conditions. When production spikes 6-7% above normal levels during the spring flush, this biological clock becomes a loaded gun pointed at farmer profitability.

Think about it: your corn farmer neighbor can wait for better prices, but you’re literally racing against bacterial counts and somatic cell proliferation. Every hour that extra milk sits in storage, its value deteriorates. When processing capacity gets overwhelmed, that 72-hour countdown becomes a ticking bomb that explodes into dumped milk.

Processing Capacity: The Rigid Bottleneck

Nobody wants to discuss the infrastructure reality: Most processing plants operate at 85-95% capacity during normal periods, leaving virtually no surge capability for seasonal peaks. It’s like running your milking parlor at maximum throughput every day—when something breaks or demand spikes, you’re instantly overwhelmed.

The numbers are stark. A typical processing facility handling 2 million pounds of milk daily has maybe 200,000-300,000 pounds of surge capacity—less than the daily production of 30 large farms. When the spring flush hits, that microscopic buffer gets obliterated in hours.

Even more infuriating: Processors know exactly when the spring flush will hit. It’s not a surprise hurricane or market crash—it’s as predictable as calving dates. Yet they continue to build infrastructure optimized for average volumes rather than seasonal peaks.

Processing capacity constraints during 2024’s spring flush forced:

• Upper Midwest farms to dump up to 350,000 gallons daily during peak periods
• Wisconsin cooperatives to divert milk to out-of-state facilities at significant transportation costs
• Regional price discounts of $2-3 per hundredweight due to local oversupply

The School Closure Demand Crater

Here’s a demand destruction mechanism that processors completely ignore in their forecasting: Schools represent roughly 7-10% of total fluid milk consumption in many regions, and they shut down en masse during Memorial Day week.

Memorial Day weekend doesn’t just reduce school milk consumption—it eliminates it entirely for 3-4 consecutive days, creating an immediate demand crater that processors somehow “forget” to account for in their forecasting models.

Meanwhile, the spring flush is simultaneously pushing production to annual peaks. It’s like having your highest-producing cows fresh at exactly the moment your biggest customer stops buying. This isn’t a forecasting challenge—it’s a recurring calendar event that processors treat like an unpredictable weather disaster.

Transportation and Logistics: The Invisible Chokepoint

Even if processing capacity existed and demand remained stable, the sheer logistics of moving 6-7% more milk during spring flush would strain transportation networks beyond breaking point.

Most farmers don’t realize that milk hauling operates on just-in-time scheduling with minimal excess capacity. Routes are optimized for average daily volumes, not seasonal peaks. When production spikes, the transportation network becomes the invisible bottleneck that can force dumping even when processing capacity is available.

Real-world example: During 2024’s spring flush, Wisconsin farms with available processing capacity 200 miles away couldn’t get their milk transported because regional haulers were already operating at maximum route density. The result? Perfectly good milk was dumped while processing plants in neighboring states ran below capacity.

Question for cooperatives: Why aren’t you investing in surge transportation capacity the same way you invest in surge storage capacity?

Technology Solutions: Innovation Exists; Adoption Doesn’t

While the dairy industry dumps milk using methods that haven’t evolved since the 1950s, other sectors have revolutionized demand forecasting and supply chain management.

Companies like Milk Moovement provide platforms with enhanced forecasting capabilities and real-time milk tracking specifically designed to reduce dumped milk—think of it as DHI testing for your supply chain.

Here’s the scale we’re talking about: Milk Moovement manages over 30 billion pounds of raw milk annually, representing about 15% of the U.S. dairy market. Their network includes 2,500 dairy farms and over 5,000 users, including Fortune 100 companies.

AI-driven forecasting systems can analyze datasets, including historical sales, weather patterns, market trends, and holiday patterns, to generate precise demand predictions. Reports suggest AI-driven forecasting can cut food waste by up to 30% and optimize supply chains to reduce spoilage by 50%.

This is like moving from visual heat detection to activity monitors—the technology exists to improve accuracy dramatically.

Imagine if your milk pricing could respond to supply and demand in real-time, like a dynamic feed purchasing program that adjusts corn buying based on inventory levels and production needs. AI-driven dynamic pricing allows retailers to adjust prices based on commodity costs, demand, and market conditions.

Some grocery retailers explore dynamic pricing strategies, including discounts for products nearing expiration—directly relevant to managing perishable surplus milk.

The technology exists in retail agriculture. The regulatory framework could be adapted.

So why aren’t we demanding this from our processors? Why are we settling for systems that would be laughably outdated in any other industry?

What Forward-Thinking Cooperatives Are Actually Doing (Spoiler: Not Enough)

Progressive cooperatives aren’t waiting for industry-wide solutions—they’re implementing changes like farmers who adopted robotic milkers before their neighbors figured out what a VMS system was.

In October 2024, USDA announced .04 million in funding to support dairy businesses under the Dairy Business Innovation Initiatives (DBI) grant program. Wisconsin’s Dairy Business Innovation Alliance (DBIA) received .45 million to continue empowering dairy farmers and processors in the Midwest.

The program offers two types of grants:

• Dairy Business Builder grants up to $100,000 for small-to-medium farms or processors
• Dairy Industry Impact grants from $50,000 to $250,000 for innovative ideas with industry-wide potential

However, these programs focus more on product development and marketing than addressing fundamental forecasting and surplus management challenges. It’s like investing in improved genetics while ignoring basic nutrition management—you’re solving part of the problem but missing the core issue.

What we need are cooperatives exploring:

• Regional milk supply balancing initiatives that function like sharing breeding services across farms
• Strategic investments in flexible processing facilities that can shift between products like farms that can adapt facilities for different housing systems
• Real-time data collaboration between processors and retailers, similar to how progressive farms share performance data with nutritionists and veterinarians

Harsh reality check: Most cooperatives still operate like they’re marketing commodity corn instead of a highly perishable product with complex demand patterns.

The Policy Vacuum: Subsidizing Failure Instead of Preventing It

Current Federal Milk Marketing Order provisions include mechanisms for “pooling” dumped milk at the lowest classified price, but this reactive approach only distributes losses rather than preventing dumping.

It’s like having a health protocol that treats sick cows but does nothing to prevent disease outbreaks.

The USDA’s Milk Loss Program compensates for weather-related disasters, not systemic processing or forecasting failures. We have programs that help farmers recover from floods and hurricanes, but nothing addresses the annual, predictable crisis that costs tens of millions annually.

This represents a fundamental policy failure—imagine having crop insurance that covers hail damage but not drought, even though drought happens more frequently and predictably.

Here’s the uncomfortable question: Why are taxpayers and dairy farmers subsidizing processor incompetence instead of demanding actual solutions?

What This Crisis Means for Your Bottom Line

You’re missing the bigger picture if you think this doesn’t affect your farm because you haven’t personally dumped milk.

The spring flush and associated dumping contribute to overall market oversupply, depressing prices for all milk through the Class III and IV pricing mechanisms. It’s like how one farm’s mastitis outbreak can affect bulk tank quality for an entire hauling route—the system’s failures impact everyone.

For farms already operating on margins thinner than optimal body condition scores, these events accelerate industry consolidation and family farm exits. Even if you’re not dumping milk, you’re paying for the industry’s surplus management failures through:

• Reduced milk prices during spring flush periods
• Increased market volatility affecting forward contracting opportunities
• Competitive disadvantage against operations in regions with better processing flexibility
• Higher cooperative marketing costs spread across all members

The brutal truth: Every gallon dumped is money stolen from your milk check.

The Innovation That’s Already Happening: Why Aren’t You Part of It?

Smart farmers aren’t waiting for industry-wide solutions. Some operations are investing in on-farm processing capabilities—like installing their own cheese or yogurt production facilities—that provide flexibility during surplus periods.

Others develop direct-marketing relationships that bypass traditional processing bottlenecks, similar to how some farms market breeding stock directly rather than through conventional channels.

Progressive dairy operations are implementing:

• Real-time production monitoring systems that provide early warning of peak production periods
• Alternative processing outlets for surplus milk, including ingredient manufacturing partnerships
• Value-added product development that can absorb seasonal production peaks
• Direct marketing strategies that command premium prices during traditional dumping periods

The technology exists. The market opportunities exist.

So, what’s your excuse for not exploring these options?

The Bottom Line: Stop Accepting the Unacceptable

Memorial Day milk dumping isn’t a weather disaster or an act of God—it’s a management failure that our industry has accepted for too long, like tolerating high somatic cell counts because “that’s just how dairy farming is.”

The collision between predictable biological production cycles and antiquated forecasting methods is bankrupting farms and destroying the value that should be feeding families.

The solutions exist: AI-driven forecasting systems that work like genomic evaluations for market prediction, dynamic pricing mechanisms that respond to supply conditions like automated feeding systems respond to individual cow needs, and flexible processing infrastructure that adapts to seasonal peaks like modern freestall barns adapt to different group sizes.

But change won’t happen until farmers demand it from their cooperatives, processors invest in 21st-century forecasting instead of relying on methods older than your foundation sires, and policymakers recognize that predictable crises deserve proactive solutions.

Memorial Day 2026 is 365 days away. Are you going to dump milk again, or will you finally fix the system?

Here’s what needs to happen—and it starts with you refusing to accept the status quo:

Your Move: The Five-Point Action Plan

1. Challenge your cooperative’s forecasting transparency. Demand to see their accuracy rates during spring flush periods. If they can’t provide them, ask why not.
2. Push for real-time data sharing agreements with processors, similar to how you share production data with DHI. No more black-box decision making that affects your income.
3. Explore DBI grant opportunities for alternative marketing channels during peak production periods. Applications for Dairy Business Builder grants (up to $100,000) are accepted regularly through the four regional initiatives.
4. Demand investment in flexible processing capacity from your cooperative—capacity that can handle seasonal peaks without dumping, the same way you invest in facilities that can adapt to changing herd sizes.
5. Connect with technology providers like Milk Moovement that are already managing 15% of the U.S. dairy market and reducing transportation costs for clients.

The power to change this system starts with informed farmers who refuse to accept “that’s how we’ve always done it” as an answer—whether it’s about breeding decisions, nutrition management, or milk marketing.

Stop subsidizing processor incompetence with your milk check. Demand better. Your farm’s survival depends on it.

Ready to stop accepting annual milk dumping as inevitable? Start by asking your cooperative one simple question: “What’s your forecasting accuracy rate during spring flush, and what are you doing to improve it?” Their answer will tell you everything you need to know about whether they’re part of the solution or part of the problem.

Key Takeaways

• Predictable Crisis Goes Unfixed: The spring flush creates 6-7% higher milk production every March-May, yet processors consistently fail to manage this biological reality, forcing farmers to dump millions of gallons annually during Memorial Day weekend.
• Technology Gap: While AI-powered forecasting systems can reduce food waste by up to 30% and companies like Milk Moovement already manage 15% of the U.S. dairy market, most processors still use 1950s-era forecasting methods that can’t handle holiday demand volatility.
• Processing Infrastructure Failure: Even accurate demand forecasts become irrelevant when processing plants operate at fixed capacity and can’t handle seasonal surges, creating bottlenecks that force dumping regardless of actual consumer demand.
• Financial Burden Shifted to Farmers: The Federal Milk Marketing Order system’s “pooling” mechanism spreads dumping losses across all producers at the lowest class price, meaning every farmer pays for systemic failures while processors avoid accountability.
• Solutions Exist but Aren’t Implemented: Real-time data sharing, dynamic pricing, flexible processing capacity, and AI-driven forecasting could solve these issues, but adoption lags due to industry inertia and lack of farmer demands for change.

Executive Summary

Memorial Day weekend has become an annual financial disaster for dairy farmers, as the predictable spring flush—when cows reach peak milk production—collides with processors’ inability to forecast holiday demand patterns accurately. During these periods, up to 3.7 million gallons of milk are dumped daily due to processing bottlenecks and outdated forecasting methods that haven’t evolved since the 1950s. While advanced AI-driven forecasting and dynamic pricing technologies exist and have proven successful in other industries, the dairy sector continues to rely on historical data and moving averages that fail catastrophically during volatile holiday periods. The current Federal Milk Marketing Order system only redistributes dumping losses across all farmers rather than preventing the waste, effectively forcing producers to subsidize processor incompetence through reduced milk prices. This systemic failure is accelerating farm consolidation and exits, turning what should be profitable holiday periods into financial bloodbaths that threaten the viability of American dairy operations.

Learn more:

• Dairy’s Golden Window: WASDE Forecasts 12 Months of Opportunity Before Component Value Compression – Explores how proper market forecasting and timing can create profitable opportunities for dairy producers, offering insights into the predictive analytics solutions discussed in the main article.
• Dairy Industry Crisis: B.C. Farmers Struggle with Rising Debts – Examines the broader financial pressures facing dairy farmers, providing additional context for how milk dumping events compound existing economic challenges threatening farm viability.
• Canadian Dairy Dilemma: Unpacking the Controversial Milk Dumping Report and Its Industry Implications – Analyzes systemic milk waste issues within supply management systems, offering a comparative perspective on how different regulatory frameworks handle surplus milk challenges.

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.