meta New Zealand dairy farmer says he’s not a polluter, but agrees to pay $103,500 ‘dirty dairying’ fine | The Bullvine

New Zealand dairy farmer says he’s not a polluter, but agrees to pay $103,500 ‘dirty dairying’ fine

A dairy farmer who allegedly said a council would never “get a dime out of me” for dirty dairy offending now says he will pay up, though he maintains he “never, ever polluted”.

Eketahuna farmer Derek Berendt and his company Huka View Dairies were fined $51,750 each in January after pleading guilty to allowing effluent to enter a waterway and keeping silage too close to water.

The fine of $103,500 is the largest imposed for ‘’dirty dairy’’ offending in the 2020-2021 year.

Berendt, who manages the farm about 7 kilometres north of Eketahuna, was charged by Horizons Regional Council after failing to heed warnings and abatement notices requiring him to comply with rules that protect waterways.

The offending went on for months in late 2018, with the discharges entering an ephemeral (sometimes dry) stream that flowed into the Hukanui Stream and the Mangatainoka River, made famous by its proximity to the Tui Brewery. Although there was no direct evidence, a scientist found the discharges would have affected aquatic life in the Mangatainoka.

In sentencing Berendt in December last year Environment Court Judge Bryan Dwyer said he had been aggressive and non-co-operative towards council staff, who he tried to keep off his property and only allowed them on when they were accompanied by police.

Berendt appealed the sentence to the High Court, which in June upheld the fines and Justice Matthew Palmer told Berendt he had been “his own worst enemy”.

Palmer noted Berendt’s “consistent attitude of flouting and ignoring the effects of his actions on the environment”, his “blatant disregard for the council’s warnings” and his “disdaining contact with the Department of Corrections and the Court”.

He also noted that the Corrections report writer had recorded Berendt as saying the council was “not going to get a dime out of me”.

Berendt last week told Stuff he never made that remark, and the fine would be paid. “I’ve got no choice, do I?,” he said.

“We’ve learned a lot out of what we’ve been through. I’ve been dairying all my life, and I am very concerned at the power the Government and these people [council inspectors] have got. We never, ever polluted,” he said.

Although there was no direct evidence, a scientist found the discharges would have affected aquatic life in the Mangatainoka River, which flows past the Tui Brewery on SH2. (File photo)

Warwick Smith/Stuff

Although there was no direct evidence, a scientist found the discharges would have affected aquatic life in the Mangatainoka River, which flows past the Tui Brewery on SH2. (File photo)

Berendt said the issue stemmed from a neighbour who complained to the council and was compounded by a personal clash he had with a council inspector.

“It’s personal from Horizons. We never polluted. It’s true that I was short with the council officer, but when he said he was going to get me I told him where to go. I don’t regret doing that,” he said.

“My advice to every farmer is that they need to carry a video camera or have a third party with them when they deal with these people, because in court your word doesn’t mean anything.”

The 2020/2021 year saw 20 companies and 13 individuals sentenced for their parts in 25 cases where dairy effluent entered rivers, streams, wetlands, or on to land where it could have entered waterways or groundwater.

Effluent from dairy cows contains nitrogen and phosphorus. When it enters waterways it causes excessive growth of weeds, algae and slime, and damages the habitat of fish, insects, and water birds. E. Coli in the effluent can be major health hazard when it enters waterways. (File photo)

DOMINICO ZAPATA/STUFF

Effluent from dairy cows contains nitrogen and phosphorus. When it enters waterways it causes excessive growth of weeds, algae and slime, and damages the habitat of fish, insects, and water birds. E. Coli in the effluent can be major health hazard when it enters waterways. (File photo)

Stuff has been collecting figures on the number of convictions for “dirty dairying” offences since 2009/10. These figures represent the most serious offending.

Fines of $1,214,725 were imposed in the latest year, 90 per cent of which will go to the regional councils undertaking the prosecutions.

A further 234 abatement notices and 176 infringement notices were issued.

The number of abatement notices in 2020/21 was below average (the annual average since 2009 is 336). The number of infringement notices was also below average (258) but the number of successful prosecutions, 25, was higher than the average of 24.

DAIRY EFFLUENT OFFENDING. SENTENCES 2020/2021:

Source: Stuff

(T14, D1)
Send this to a friend