Archive for Dairy Industry – Page 67

Price fluctuations decrease in dairy market

Trade wars, climate change and shrinking reserves. Many factors determine what the dairy market will look like in 2019. Those factors create uncertainty. Yet the market is expected to develop positively.

In the European Union, the drought in 2018 resulted in reduced milk production over the course of the last months of the year. In the autumn of 2018, the European Commission reported an expected production growth of approximately 0.8%. It should, however, be mentioned that production showed a growth of slightly more than 2%.

The growth turned out to be lower, due to the drought that affected the market only after that. Also in the first 6 months of this year milk production is expected to show little or no growth. Last year’s dry summer has resulted in disappointing corn and grass yields in comparison with previous years. The European Commission estimates an expected increase of slightly less than 1%. This growth has to be realised in the second halve of the year, as the lack of roughage will limit milk production in important parts of Europe during the first months of the year.

Figure 1 – Price of skimmed milk powder is increasing (in $ per tonne).

Growth in EU

The European Commission expects a 4.5% growth compared to last year. This growth is largely the result of a growing world demand for European dairy products. This increase in demand for dairy products from the EU requires a growth in production. The European Commission expects a 0.6% growth in milk production in 2019, while also consumption within the EU will show a 0.7% rise. Current figures for 2019 show that demand is exceeding production. This offers hope of a good milk price within the European Union. The fact that intervention stocks of skimmed milk powder is as good as sold, reinforces the European market. Because of this, the skimmed milk powder market is less distorted, which has already led to higher product prices in the last weeks of 2018. The market price even passed the intervention level of € 1,689 per tonne. Even though the European Commission did not succeed in selling a product above this level, the fact that intervention stocks are sold does result in a better skimmed milk powder market (Figure 1). Also no further drop in butter prices is expected (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – No further drop in butter prices (in $ per tonne).

US trade wars

The policy of American president Donald Trump is creating uncertainty in world trade. This also has consequences for the global dairy market. First and foremost due to the exchange rate of the dollar. Currency markets are very sensitive and can contribute to the export position of the United States and other major players in the dairy market. Trump’s trade conflicts with China, Canada and Mexico don’t make the situation any clearer. These 3 countries are the main destination for American dairy. Yet, Trump’s actions do not appear to be hitting the United States too hard. In the third quarter of 2018 dairy export in total was 14% higher than it was a year before. This growth is mainly caused by an increased export of skimmed milk powder to Mexico and a strong position in the South-East Asian market. Despite the increase in total export, the US has also paid heavily. Cheese exports from America to Mexico has dropped by 11% in the third quarter of 2018. Dairy exports to China was hit hard in this period: a decline of 22%. How the United States will manifest itself in the dairy market this year remains uncertain. Dutch agrofood banker Rabobank expects the exchange rate of the American dollar and the availability of dairy products in the months ahead will determine the role of the US in the global dairy market in the next few years.

Chinese demand remains

China remains an important export destination for dairy products. In 2019 the Chinese dairy import is expected to grow. In last year’s final quarterly report Rabobank speaks of an import growth of 11%. This is a 7% increase compared to previous forecasts. A moderate growth of Chinese milk production and a disappointing import in 2018 will probably lead to a substantial import growth this year. If Rabobank looks further ahead and says something about 2020, import growth is estimated at 4%. The fact that milk production in China lags behind expectations is largely due to the trade war with the United States. Chinese dairy farmers partially depend on American feed compounds. The trade war and the associated import tariffs drive up feed costs for dairy farmers. Rabobank estimates a 1% growth of milk production. That is less than previous estimates. Additionally there have been some modifications in the Chinese Statistical Year book. Between 2006 and 2017 milk production has been revised downwards by 15%. This shows the consumption was less than expected and there was a greater dependence on imports from other countries.

New Zealand

New Zealand is still one of the major dairy exporters. Up until November 2018 milk production in New Zealand is well above the previous season (June – May). From June till November 4.4% more milk was produced in comparison to the previous season. Milk production in New Zealand is expected to show another increase this season (Figure 3). Currently New Zealand is one of the most important producers on the global market.

Figure 3 – Good weather conditions increases milk output in New Zealand (in x 1,000 tonne / month).

Russia aims at own production

The Russian import ban on most major players in the dairy market, increases the pressure on domestic milk production. The predictions for 2019 are that a production growth of 1% will be realised. This increase will primarily be the result of a major efficiency boost and genetic improvements, because while more milk is needed, the size of the dairy herd is slowly declining. It is clear that Russian milk production will increase in the years ahead. Significant investments are made in the construction of large dairy farms. Last year the government announced their plans to build 800 large dairy farms. The objective of the Russian government is to eventually become self-sufficient. Although Russia has no strong economic growth, Russian consumers have increasingly greater spending power. This will lead to an increase in consumption of healthy dairy products, according to the forecasts of Hexa Research, and American research firm. In the near future, the Russian growth is not a restraining factor to the global dairy market. Many exporting countries have demonstrated that the Russian market is closed to them. By circuitous routes products do find their way into Russia, but these volumes are nothing compared to total export volumes. On the other hand it will take time before the Russians will be able to enter the global market with dairy products.

Positive undertone

Generally speaking the outlook for the dairy market is positive. Although the market will not show extremely high prices, in the months to come the market will have a firm ground on which basic dairy can support a good milk price. The only aspect the dairy market has little impact on are weather forecasts. They can slightly change production, but in general the dairy market has a strong position.

Dairy prices remain within narrower bandwidth

Consistent with last year, the dairy market shows few severe fluctuations similar to the previous period. This is what dairy market analyst Mark Voorbergen expects. “Prices will move, but within a narrower bandwidth.” Mr Voorbergen does not expect the basic dairy supply to significantly increase or decline this year. “I see no movements that indicate extra large volumes will enter the market from any region,” he says. Driving forces in the global market are currently New Zealand and Ireland. “They are the cornerstones of the dairy supply,” Mr Voorbergen believes. He is not impressed with milk production in the other export countries. China will play a role in the vision on the market in 2019. According to Mr Voorbergen the Chinese dairy farming sector is struggling due to the trade war with the United States. “Import duties on soy and other raw materials drive up feed costs. China’s dairy production and demand do show growth but not as strong as previous years. Also import requirements from China increase, even though this increase will be moderate compared to previous years.” For dairy exporters from the United States trade barriers are currently a killjoy. A large amount of cheddar is being kept in storage, while it was intended for neighbouring country Mexico. As long as the new trade agreement with Mexico remains unsigned, all they can do is wait. “For the product’s price this is not a positive development,” Mr Voorbergen says. “The more time passes before the agreement is signed, the greater the odds are that prices will drop.” All in all Mr Voorbergen thinks the market for butter, milk powders and cheese have a solid foundation and are likely to improve in the months ahead. “I don’t expect large fluctuations,” Mr Voorbergen shares. “The only thing we can’t influence, are weather conditions. They can play a significant role in pushing up prices.”

 

Source: Dairy Global

NMPF, IDFA Support Legislation Allowing Whole Milk in School Meals

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) and the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) welcome the introduction of legislation sponsored by Reps. Glenn Thompson (R-PA) and Collin Peterson (D-MN), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, allowing whole milk in school nutrition programs.

The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2019 (H.R. 832) has eight other co-sponsors, including Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), ranking Republican on the House Agriculture Committee.

Adding whole milk to school menus reflects research showing that such products benefit children and gives school administrators one more tool with which to develop healthy eating habits.

“Whole milk provides yet another way for children to receive dairy’s nutritional benefits as part of a healthy eating pattern,” said Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of NMPF. “This bill encourages the proper nutrition they need to lead healthy lives.”

“We thank Rep. Thompson for his leadership and Chairman Peterson for being an original co-sponsor on this bill to allow schools more flexibility to offer the same types of milk that children and teens enjoy at home. Providing expanded milk options will help ensure that students get the nutrients that milk uniquely provides, including calcium, vitamin D and potassium,” said Michael Dykes, D.V.M., president and CEO of IDFA.

 

Source: NMPF

Bega and Saputo step up

Bega Cheese and Saputo Dairy Australia-Warrnambool Cheese and Butter have announced milk price increases.

Saputo-WCB announced on Thursday it was stepping up its farmgate milk price by seven cents/kilogram for butterfat and 14c/kg for protein, lifting the amount it would pay farmers to $6.05c kilogram/MS.

The payment will be made with January 2019 proceeds, during February 2019

That’s up from $5.95c kg/MS.

“This payment is retrospective and applies to all qualifying milk supplied by current WCB and SDA suppliers from 1 July 1, 2018,” a Saputo Dairy Australia spokesman said.

Saputo also lifted its price in its NSW–Sydney market region by

8 cents/kg butterfat and 12 cents/kg protein.

This increases the average farmgate milk price for the 2018/19 season suppliers in the NSW–Sydney Market Region to 52.7 cents per litre, up from 52 cents per litre.

The Saputo spokesman said while world markets had seen some improvement recently due mainly to easing growth in milk production and a reduction in skim milk powder stockpiles in the European Union, prices declined across dairy commodities during the first half.

“As such, this price increase reflects our acknowledgement that farm conditions remain challenging for our suppliers and any sustained market recovery is still ahead.”

“We will continue to monitor the market and review the milk price again in April 2019, in accordance with our quarterly review process.”

Bega announced on Wednesday a milk price increase of 14c/kg milk solids.

Executive chairman Barry Irvin said the increase would equate to farmers receiving an additional $0.096c/kg for butterfat and $0.192c/kg for protein, as a loyalty payment from July 1 last year.

It would be applied as an increase for milk supplied from February 1 to June 30, this year.

 

Source: The Australian Dairyfarmer

Federal government provides $2.7M in funding to Dairy Farmers of Canada

The federal government has committed more than $2 million to support the Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC) in order to enhance public trust in dairy production.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister Lawrence MacAulay was at Ferme Geranik in St. Albert, Ont. recently to announce an investment of up to $2.7 million.

“Our government is pleased to support Canada’s dairy farmers in their efforts to demonstrate that their products meet the highest standards for quality and safety and are produced responsibly and sustainably. Building consumer confidence and trust helps ensure the growth and sustainability of Canada’s dairy sector,” said MacAulay.

The DFC has a quality assurance program called proAction. This and the pursuit of an industry environmental sustainability strategy will be the areas where the funding will be used.

The investment will help DFC further develop and implement proAction, pursue stakeholder engagement, initiate an industry environmental sustainability strategy and implement a plan to communicate with stakeholders, customers and consumers on DFC’s quality assurance and sustainability activities.

“Dairy farmers across Canada are committed to the highest standards in regard to sustainable production. As such, our proAction program has been instrumental in demonstrating farmers’ responsible stewardship in producing milk that is of the highest quality,” said Pierre Lampron, president of Dairy Farmers of Canada. “This funding will allow for ongoing improvement of proAction and will ensure that the industry meets the expectations of consumers for decades to come.”

 

Source: Truro News

As Dairy Farms Head Into 5th Year Of Low Milk Prices, Support Builds For Supply Management

Farmers stand for the Pledge of Allegiance at their annual banquet at the 2019 Vermont Farm Show. John Dillon / VPR

After four years of low milk prices — which has led to the loss of dozens of Vermont dairy farms — experts say to expect little improvement in 2019. As the downward spiral continues, policymakers are increasingly looking for ways to control the milk supply to stop the price freefall.

Douglas DiMento works for the Agri-Mark dairy cooperative, the largest in New England. He told farmers gathered Thursday at the Vermont Farm Show that the price situation is likely to improve, but only because fewer farmers will be making milk.

“We do expect prices to increase later this year, but most of that increase will come in the second half of the year,” DiMento said. “Unfortunately, a lot of the increase is going to come on the backs of farmers going out of business throughout the U.S. It’s been a tough four years, and we’re looking like it’s going to be another tough fifth year in a row for farmers.”

“It’s been a tough four years, and we’re looking like it’s going to be another tough fifth year in a row for farmers.” — Douglas DiMento, Agri-Mark

Vermont had 796 dairy farms in 2017 and 702 in the last quarter of 2018, according to numbers provided by the state.

The serious attrition in farm numbers has been the focus of work at the Vermont Milk Commission, a state body charged with improving the dairy economy.

The commission said in a new report that some form of supply management system is needed to curb the chronic overproduction that has depressed milk prices for years. 

The report recommends a “growth management plan” that would include a two-tiered pricing system that would pay farmers less above predetermined production limits. 

“What’s the signal to stop making milk? The signals aren’t there,” said Diane Bothfeld, the director of administrative services at the Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets. “Potentially in this program, your base gets the going rate. And if you’re over that, you get a much lower rate, much lower.”

“What’s the signal to stop making milk? The signals aren’t there. … We’re overproducing for what we have markets for.” — Diane Bothfeld, Vermont Agency of Agriculture

Bothfeld served as adviser to the Vermont Milk Commission. Her message to farmers Thursday was that the industry has to find some way to control its own production. She described herself as a reluctant convert to the idea of supply management.

“We’re overproducing for what we have markets for,” she said.

To underscore her point, she pointed to the latest federal data that shows 1.4 billion pounds of dairy products are stored around the country. 

“November the year before, it was 1.2 billion. This isn’t going away,” Bothfeld said. “We’ve got too much product. It puts downward pressure on prices and makes it hard for the prices to recover. We can try exporting it, we can try eating it, but we’ve got too much. I have never been an advocate of supply management. I don’t see any other way out of these prices. So I have been converted.”

Bothfeld said any supply management program needs to implemented nationally if it’s going to work, but she acknowledged it will be a tough fight in Congress.

And that is the challenge, said Bill Rowell who owns Green Mountain Dairy, a large farm operation in Sheldon.

Rowell has long advocated for supply management. He said overproduction is both a regional issue, and a national problem.

“This is a detriment to all of our farms and the rural communities across the country,” Rowell said.

“This [overproduction] is a detriment to all of our farms and the rural communities across the country.” — Bill Rowell, Sheldon dairy farmer

According to Rowell, half the nation’s milk comes from just 1,200 of the country’s 45,000 dairy farms.

“And [those farms] are not really in the East — they’re in the upper Midwest, the West, and the Southwest,” he said. “So Congress needs to pay attention.”

The milk commission report laid out some broad parameters for lawmakers to consider, including a governance board made up of dairy farmers that would work in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The program would also need a methodology to establish base production levels and would need to develop rules to deal with the the merging of farm operations and other changes in business structures.

Source: digital.vpr.net

Dairy Industry Struggles in a Sea of Plant-Based Milks

Fernand Gagne, with his granddaughter, started his career in the dairy industry and now owns Gagne Maple in Swanton, Vt.©Russell French Photography

There are many plant-based milks to sort through in the dairy aisle. Similarly, there are many reports on the dairy industry itself that require a closer look.

Is the industry declining?

Dairy farmers are seeking stable products, like plant-based milks, while struggling to survive in a volatile economy.

Historically, milk prices have been low compared to what small farmers pay for production, one of the incentives to produce cheese as well, according to Milk! A 10,000-Year Food Fracas, a 2018 book by Mark Kurlansky.

In 1942, the average cow produced under 5,000 pounds of milk in a lifetime, and that average has increased to 21,000 pounds, according to the book, with farmers overfeeding protein to their cows to increase output.

All of this has happened as dairy milk consumption has declined. Americans drank 149 pounds of dairy milk per capita in 2017, down from 247 pounds in 1975, according to USDA data. There is too much dairy milk.

Over the past five years, dairy companies who have invested in milk alternatives, by planting almond trees or buying brands, for example, have shown returns above standalone dairy, according to a Rabobank report. Even large dairy companies like Hood are producing their own oat milk to meet consumer tastes. It makes sense for farmers too.

“A lot of small dairy companies from upstate New York to the Midwest now do an almond or soy milk — and probably if this really takes off, oat,” Christopher Ross, vice president of marketing for Hood, said.

Other small dairy farmers are producing maple to stay afloat.

Coombs Family Farms is a seventh-generation organic maple brand in the U.S. Coombs purchases maple from about 3,000 farmers, serving as their outlet to the marketplace and sees increased maple production as a good thing, Arnold Coombs, owner of the company, said.

“There’s not much else to do in springtime up here. It’s always been good second crop for dairy farmers,” Coombs said. “There’s money in maple, and it brings more stability to the annual cash flow.”

The best weather for maple is low 20s at night and 40 degrees during day, he said. Since many dairy farmers don’t spend much time in the fields in that type of weather, maple is a great crop for them.

The process is labor intensive. Forty gallons of sap creates only 1 gallon of maple. The raw sap looks like water when it leaves the tree and spoils very quickly, he said.

The farm bill approved an important update for the maple industry. Along with honey, agave and other syrup companies, maple makers no longer have to state “includes X g Added Sugars,” on their labels, since their products do not have added sugars. The bill also extended grants for maple research and promotion.

With a bustling CBD market, hemp could be the next alternative crop for dairy farmers, Coombs said.

“They are under a lot of stress and trying to figure out other ways,” he said.

Source: forbes.com

Dairy Producers Fret Over China’s Shrinking Newborn Population

A customer shops for milk powder in a supermarket in Nantong, East China’s Jiangsu Province, in November 2017. Photo: IC

Chinese dairy producers may face problems in 2019 as the number of births in the country is expected to keep dropping while more foreign rivals enter the market amid government moves to encourage imports, ramping up pressure on domestic players.

In the latest sign of demographic pressures on China’s dairy industry, US investment bank Goldman Sachs cut the price target on Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group from 29 yuan ($4.28) to 28.3 yuan a share and that of Mengniu Dairy from $HK24.5 ($3.12) to $HK24.2.

It also trimmed the target on milk powder manufacturer H&H Group from $HK66.2 to $HK65.1.

China’s newborn population is estimated to have fallen 7 – 13 percent year-on-year to between 15 million and 16 million in 2018, according to a report issued by Gaohua Securities in January. In 2017, 17.23 million newborns were added to China’s population, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

The decline has prompted Goldman Sachs to estimate that sales of baby formula this year will be flat with last year or perhaps post a 0.5 percent slight increase, financial news website caixin.com reported over the weekend. Sales are estimated to drop 2 percent year-on-year in 2020.

This year “will see the end of the ‘golden era’ for China’s dairy industry, which has boomed since 2014,” Song Liang, a Beijing-based expert on the dairy industry, told the Global Times on Sunday.

Also, domestic prices are relatively higher than those of foreign brands both in terms of raw materials and processing costs, so local producers are losing competitiveness amid government policies to encourage imports, Song added.

The processing cost for milk products in the US and Europe is about 4,000 yuan a ton, but in China it is 7,000 – 8,000 yuan a ton, according to Song.

Despite the slowing domestic economy, industry analysts point out that Chinese consumers are still willing to pay hefty prices for high-end infant formulas.

“Maybe Chinese milk producers should think about how to take advantage of their geographic proximity to conquer the high-end market,” Song said.

Source: Global Times

Dairy report says U.S. exports to Japan endangered

A study released today by the U.S. Dairy Export Council projects new trade agreements between Japan and other countries will put U.S. dairy exports at a competitive disadvantage, resulting in lost sales of $5.4 billion over 21 years.

The Japanese dairy market, the fourth largest export destination for U.S. dairy exports, is expected to continue to grow in years to come, but new trade agreements between Japan and Australia, New Zealand and the European Union will give the advantage to competitors, according to the study conducted by Tokyo-based Meros Consulting.

However, “without swift and effective action by the U.S. to secure a strong trade treaty with Japan that exceeds Japan’s agreements with Australia, New Zealand and the European Union, the U.S. could see its market share drop in half over the next decade,” the study says.

Australia and New Zealand have the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership in place with Japan already and as of this Friday, Europe’s agreement with Japan will take effect too, the U.S. Dairy Eport Council noted. Without a strong U.S.-Japan trade treaty, competitors will seize a cumulative $1.3 billion in dairy sales over the next decade that would otherwise have been supplied from the U.S., a toll that climbs to $5.4 billion once CPTPP and the Japan-EU agreements are fully implemented, USDEC added.

“These agreements will give our competition a significant economic advantage that will enable them to increase their market share in Japan, costing the U.S. dairy industry billions of dollars in lost sales,” said Tom Vilsack, USDEC’s president and CEO.

“U.S. dairy farmers and processors strongly support the administration’s launch of trade talks with Japan. We hope this report provides fresh ammunition to our negotiators about why a strong U.S.-Japan agreement is so important for American agriculture.”

“U.S. dairy farmers are facing economic hardships, and expanding opportunities overseas is the best way to counter that,” said National Milk Producers Federation President and CEO Jim Mulhern. “A trade deal with Japan that significantly expands dairy access would make 2019 a brighter year.”

 

Source: The Fence Post

Experts predict another challenging year for dairy farmers

Brickstead Dairy in Greenleaf was awarded the 2017 Wisconsin Leopold Conservation Award, December 8, 2017. (WLUK)

Experts are predicting another challenging year for dairy farmers following four straight years of low farm milk prices.

Mark Stephenson, director of Dairy Policy Analysis at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, says he expects prices to be better this year than in 2018, but not by a lot.

One plus is that the new farm bill includes an improved insurance program to help farmers during times of low prices but that program has been delayed by the partial government shutdown. While the shutdown is over, the Farm Services Agency still needs to write the rules for the program before the payments start. Experts expect the payments to be retroactive.

“Vermont dairy farmer Walter Bothfeld says, “It helps but it’s almost too little too late.”

Source: fox11online.com

Study Shows Trade Agreements by Competitors will Threaten U.S. Dairy Exports to Japan

A study released today by the U.S. Dairy Export Council projects new trade agreements between Japan and other countries will put U.S. dairy exports at a competitive disadvantage, resulting in lost U.S. sales of $5.4 billion over 21 years.

The Japanese dairy market, the fourth largest export destination for U.S. dairy exports, is expected to continue to grow in years to come. With a level playing field, the U.S. could roughly double its market share, according to the study conducted by Tokyo-based Meros Consulting.

However, without swift and effective action by the U.S. to secure a strong trade treaty with Japan that meets or exceeds Japan’s agreements with Australia, New Zealand and the European Union, the U.S. could see its market share drop in half over the next decade. 

Australia and New Zealand have the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) in place with Japan already and as of this Friday, Europe’s agreement with Japan will take effect too. Without a strong U.S.-Japan trade treaty, competitors will seize a cumulative $1.3 billion in dairy sales over the next decade that would otherwise have been supplied from the U.S., a toll that climbs to $5.4billion once CPTPP and the Japan-EU agreements are fully implemented. 

“These agreements will give our competition a significant economic advantage that will enable them to increase their market share in Japan, costing the U.S. dairy industry billions of dollars in lost sales,” said Tom Vilsack, USDEC’s President and CEO. “U.S. dairy farmers and processors strongly support the Administration’s launch of trade talks with Japan. We hope this report provides fresh ammunition to our negotiators about why a strong U.S.-Japan agreement is so important for American agriculture.”

“U.S. dairy farmers are facing economic hardships, and expanding opportunities overseas is the best way to counter that,” said National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) President and CEO Jim Mulhern. “A trade deal with Japan that significantly expands dairy access would make 2019 a brighter year.”   

 

Source: U.S. DEC

Tough to maintain US dairy farms now

We’re moving into the New Year and I have been reflecting on the changes in farming in this area over the many years since I grew up in North Bloomfield. Dramatic changes have taken place in the dairy industry and in growing grain.

As I have written in the past, 50 to 60 years ago roads in the rural areas were lined with dairy farms, mostly small herds of 15 to 50 cows. These cows were housed in small stanchion barns with a silo attached on the side or end.

Much of the milk was being sent to market in 10-gallon milk cans, with bulk tanks just starting to become popular. In the barn, pipelines were being used on a few farms, with better cooling being done in the milk house through mechanical rather than water cooling.

Take a look around and you will see that a dramatic change has taken place.

First, there are just a fraction of the dairy farms still in business today. With milk prices continuing to be below cost of production, we will probably lose more farms in the future. One of the most recent ones was the Polchin Family herd up in Cherry Valley, Ashtabula County.

The Polchins had received a letter from the processor that was taking their milk telling them they no longer wanted it after a certain date. Polchins searched for a buyer but there was no demand for their milk, so they made the decision to sell their registered herd of Holsteins.

It was not an easy decision for them since dairy farming had been a big part of their lives for many years.

Milk prices going into 2019 do not look good. There is just plain too much milk in this country and without a strong export market, prices won’t increase to levels needed for profitable dairy farming.

Actions taken by our federal government, such as tariffs and discontinuing trade agreements, have had a negative effect on the dairy export market. Right now, USDA is sitting on about 1.4 billion pounds of cheese, the largest in history. Until that surplus is disposed of, it will depress milk prices because cheese is one of the products that support the milk price.

According to the USDA, China has just now started to buy substantial amounts of our agricultural products as well as manufactured and other products. How long this will continue is not known because China is an erratic and uncertain market.

Other factors not related to exports affect the milk price. For example, when you walk into the grocery store, you may see the dairy case full of products that are labeled “milk.” It may be an almond, coconut or other plant-based beverage, but it is not real cow’s milk and is an inferior product. But some people buy it thinking it is equal nutritionally to milk, but it is not.

Regulations have been passed requiring these beverages to be label something other than milk but they have not been enforced. A recent survey found that 61 percent of consumers want FDA to enforce regulations that require plant-based beverages to be labeled other than milk.

Considering the outlook for better milk prices, what is the future for dairy farming in this area? While we have seen many local dairy farms hang on in spite of low prices, this can’t continue forever. Across Ohio and in many states, dairy farms keep going out of business.

This may continue until the amount of milk and the demand are in balance and that may take some time. The future is not as bright as those still in the business would like. Let’s hope prices get at least good enough for them to stay in business.

Source: tribtoday.com

Big Island Dairy’s closure presents hardship for Oahu dairy

The impending closure of Big Island Dairy is complicating the operations of a small dairy on another island.

Naked Cow Dairy in Waianae is the only dairy on the island of Oahu. It produces gourmet butter and artisan cheese with milk from its small herd. When their cows aren’t milking, they rely on shipments from Big Island Dairy.

Citing financial and regulatory reasons, Big Island Dairy will cease operations by the end of April. As part of a settlement with a community group and an environmental organization, the dairy must stop milking cows by end of February. Kupale Ookala and the Center for Food Safety filed a lawsuit against Big Island Dairy in 2017, alleging violations of the federal Clean Water Act.

Residents have long complained about releases of manure-laden water from the dairy into the nearby gulches that run through or next to the community.

Naked Cow Dairy is now rushing to raise $200,000 to purchase about 50 cows from the closing dairy, Hawaii News Now reported.

“We’re going to have to do it on our own somehow, otherwise we won’t exist,” said Naked Cow Dairy owner Monique van der Stroom. “Somehow we’ll figure it out, but this is an opportunity, a sad opportunity, but an opportunity for us to actually grow and take on some of the milk that we’re losing.”

Other cows from Big Island Dairy have already been sold. A group that rescued animals during last year’s Kilauea eruption bought 61 bottle-fed calves. Those animals now have homes at animal sanctuaries and private properties across the Big Island. The Hawaii Lava Flow Animal Rescue Network hopes to raise money to buy another group of cows.

 

Source: The Wichita Eagle

U.S. Dairy Farmers Say Billions of Exports at Risk

The U.S. dairy industry stands to lose billions of dollars over the next two decades if trade agreements with Japan, one of the biggest buyers, don’t materialize, according to a U.S. Dairy Export Council report released Wednesday.

The Japanese are gobbling up more cheesy pizzas and proteins like whey, at the same time that its own dairy industry is seeing a decline. Exporters are aggressively competing to supply that growing demand, and the European Union has a leg up on the U.S. due to a trade agreement that went into affect at the end of last year. Other major exporting countries are set to benefit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a pact from which the U.S. withdrew.

The U.S. saw record dairy exports in 2018, said former Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who now heads the Dairy Export Council. But if nothing else changes, in a decade, half of the U.S.’ Japanese business will be wrested away by competitors. Two decades from now in 2038, American dairies will have lost $5.4 billion.

It’s not just Japan that U.S. dairy farmers are worried about. Trade spats with their No. 1 cheese customer, Mexico, and with China have led to lost sales. The pile of tariffs may begin to erode farmers’ support for the administration.

‘Very Patient’

“We have momentum that can be either significantly supercharged or we can have further depression on prices by limiting our capacity to export,” Vilsack said by telephone. “Dairy farmers have been very patient, but at some time they need to see some positive light at the end of the tunnel. They need to see some success.”

There are several reasons why Japanese people are eating more dairy. The economy is growing, so people are buying higher-end products. There’s an interest in easy-to-prepare foods, like pizza, and wellness is big, so sports associations are touting whey protein, Vilsack said. Meanwhile, Japanese dairy farmers are aging and younger farmers aren’t replacing them, so production is in decline.

Japan is the second biggest cheese importer, and if the U.S. could negotiate market access equal to its rivals, it could supply 24 percent of the the country’s cheese by 2027, up from 13 percent in 2017, according to the report.

American dairy farmers have been struggling with a years-long slide in milk prices. Many aren’t making it. In Wisconsin alone, more than 600 dairies left the industry last year.

“If competitors have a 10 to 20 percent advantage, it doesn’t make a difference how good your product is,” Vilsack said.

 
 
Source: Bloomberg

New Zealand dairy cattle numbers drop for the second year

The number of dairy cattle in New Zealand has dipped for the second year, while beef cattle numbers increased strongly in 2018, the country’s statistics department Stats NZ said on Thursday.

Provisional figures from the 2018 agricultural production census showed dairy cattle numbers fell 1 percent to 6.4 million in June 2018, Stats NZ said.

“This followed a similar small dip in 2017, though overall dairy cattle numbers have been relatively steady since 2012,” agricultural production statistics manager Stuart Pitts said in a statement.

Total dairy cattle were at their highest level in 2014 at 6.7 million, Pitts said.

Dairy products are a huge export for New Zealand. The value of milk powder, butter, and cheese exports for the year ended June 2018 was 14.1 billion NZ dollars (9.5 billion U.S. dollars), statistics showed.

Beef cattle numbers rose for the second year in a row, up 5 percent to 3.8 million in 2018, Pitts said.

Total sheep numbers eased again in 2018, down 1 percent to 27.3 million, he said, adding sheep numbers have fallen in 10 of the past 12 years, in total down about 12.8 million from about 40.1 million in 2006.

“New Zealand now has 5.6 sheep for every person, after peaking at 22 sheep for every person in 1982,” Pitts said.

A large fall in sheep and beef cattle numbers since 1990 means overall stock units have fallen in the past 28 years, despite a rise in dairy cattle numbers, he said.

The Ministry for Primary Industries’ latest report showed that about 52,000 dairy cattle have been culled as part of the response to the cattle disease Mycoplasma bovis.

Source: xinhuanet.com

Rhode Island dairy farms vanishing amid crash in milk prices

There are no days off for Edwin “Scooter” LaPrise and his family at their 12-acre dairy farm, EMMA Acres.

They rise by 5:30 a.m., 365 days a year, rain or shine. “Sometimes we have breakfast before coming down, sometimes we don’t; it depends on the day,” said Maggie LaPrise, Scooter’s 19-year-old daughter. “Then we get chores started. We milk the cows first, then go feed the calves, clean all the barns and feed everyone.”

Morning chores are usually done by 9 a.m. Then in the afternoon, around 4 p.m., the whole cycle starts up again.

For Scooter, it’s a way of life. “You can’t get farming out of you,” he told WPRI 12 on a recent visit to the Exeter farm. “I mean, once it’s in you, you’re there.”

The LaPrise family’s routine was once the most common type of agriculture in Rhode Island. But today, it’s vanishing.

In 1964, the federal Census of Agriculture found 420 dairy farms in Rhode Island, many of them small operations to sustain an individual farm family. Now, a half-century later, there are just 11 in the whole state — nine cow dairies and two goat dairies. (One of the nine cow dairies only produces cheese and yogurt.)

“The number of dairy farmers going out of business is a scary thought, to be honest,” said Ken Ayars, longtime chief of the Division of Agriculture at the R.I. Department of Environmental Management. He estimates Rhode Island is losing an average of one dairy farm annually. Just last year, the Cottrell Homestead off Route 138 in South Kingstown sold its cows after 118 years of operation.

“Dairy has been struggling for a long period of time. … It’s a big concern of ours,” Ayars said. “We’ll do whatever we can to keep them viable.”

LaPrise said the biggest current challenge is the national price of wholesale milk, which has been down for more than four years. It costs him about $22 to produce roughly 90 gallons of milk, but he’s only paid $16.50 to $17.50. He and his wife, who bought the property in 1990, work off the farm to make ends meet: she is a registered nurse, while he runs a trucking company.

“Every day, you can walk down through the barn and say, yup, I’m losing $5 a day on her, $5 a day on her,” LaPrise said.

In addition to the oversupply of milk, consumption has dropped considerably as more people consume non-dairy alternatives made from almonds, coconuts or oats. Another recent setback has been the ongoing U.S. trade war: the National Milk Producers Federation estimates tariffs have cost dairies more than $1 billion. There are local challenges, too, such as the high cost of land and energy in Rhode Island.

Nationwide, the strain on dairy farmers has become so severe that some have taken their own lives.

“The despair is palpable; suicide is a fact of life, though many farm suicides are listed as accidents,” Jim Goodman, a Wisconsin farmer who is leaving the dairy business after 40 years, wrote in The Washington Post last month. “A farmer I knew for many years came home from town, folded his good clothes for the last time and killed himself. I saw no warning, though maybe others did.”

Ayars said one of his biggest concerns is succession — recruiting another generation to take over local dairy farms when the current proprietors retire.

“Dairy farming is the most year-round, intensive type of agriculture that exists,” he said. “Cows are milked twice a day minimally. It’s hard to break away from the farm. There are not a lot of young people that want to live that lifestyle, to be honest.”

The disappearance of dairy has occurred despite a broader revival in agriculture across Rhode Island, where the number of farms jumped from about 850 in 2002 to more than 1,200 in 2012. In fact, some former dairy farms have converted to other crops.

Even for the Rhode Island dairy industry, it’s not all bad news. Ayars pointed to family-owned Wright’s Dairy Farm in North Smithfield, which just completed a renovation of its on-site store.

“You have a retail environment happening right at the farm, processing happens at the farm, everything’s more or less self-contained,” he said. “Those are the types of dairy environments where we find much more chance of a long-term future. When you’re not able to tap into it, that’s much more of a challenge.”

Another boost has come from Rhody Fresh, a brand of locally produced milk that’s now sold in more than 100 area supermarkets. The Rhode Island Dairy Farmers Cooperative launched Rhody Fresh in 2004 with grants of $21,000 from DEM and $30,000 from The Rhode Island Foundation. The group also got a $125,000 loan from the state’s Small Business Loan Fund.

“It really took off pretty rapidly,” Ayars said. “They were able to pay the loan back faster than the terms required.”

Four of the state’s eight remaining milk-producing cow dairies are part of Rhody Fresh: EMMA Acres, Escobar’s Highland Farm in Portsmouth, Elmrock Farm in Ashaway and Breene Hollow Farm in West Greenwich. The farmers wind up with more of the proceeds from their milk by selling it themselves rather than to a large out-of-state processing company.

Ayars said Rhody Fresh is a clear success story. “If it wasn’t for that, I wouldn’t be talking about eight or nine dairy farmers,” he said. “We’d probably be talking about far less than that.”

LaPrise said Rhody Fresh has helped, but he’s frustrated that it gets undercut on price by other brands, especially at large national chains. “They sell it for less than it costs us to make it,” he said. “That’s really hurt.” He urged Rhode Islanders to buy milk from Rhody Fresh, Wright’s or other local producers. “At least the money that you’re spending stays here,” he said.

LaPrise said he would also like to see the state legalize the sale of raw milk, which is allowed in Massachusetts and Connecticut and appeals to consumers who don’t want it pasteurized. But bills to do that have died repeatedly at the State House.

In 2017, the Senate created a legislative commission to study the state’s policy on raw milk and report back by Jan. 2, 2018. But a spokesperson confirmed no one was ever actually appointed to the commission, so it never got off the ground. (The commission’s prime sponsor, former state Sen. Nick Kettle, has since resigned.)

State Sen. Sue Sosnowski, a South Kingstown Democrat and an influential voice on agricultural issues, said she’s open to allowing raw milk but has heard testimony for and against in the past. “If Scooter LaPrise would come to me and say he would testify, I would be right on it,” she said, though she added that the state would need to establish clear rules.

Sosnowski says the state has taken other steps to help dairy farmers, including exemptions from sales tax and turning their acreage into conservation land to lower property taxes. She suggested the state’s public colleges should switch to buying Rhody Fresh milk for students to give the industry a further boost.

Massachusetts and Connecticut have other programs to help dairy farmers that Rhode Island does not, including tax credits and price supports, according to LaPrise. Ayars said the new farm bill, which President Trump signed late last year, includes additional supports for dairy farmers that he hopes will “provide a safety net for the industry.”

In the meantime, LaPrise is taking a page out of Wright’s book at EMMA Acres. The family is currently building a small store they hope to have open in the spring that will sell milk and cheese as well as fruits and vegetables.  “Hopefully,” he said, “it will catch on and we can help support the farm by selling a little finished product.”

Maggie, his daughter, acknowledges the idea of taking over the farm makes her anxious. “It can’t really sustain supporting a family,” she said. “They can barely support themselves, these cows. So it stresses me out a little bit thinking about my future.”

“But as of right now,” she said, “my future is going to be on the farm.”

Source: wpri.com

How dairy company Synlait went from a wobbly start to sharemarket darling in 10 years

Synlait Milk chairman Graeme Milne. Photo / Christine Cornege

Synlait Milk didn’t get to be a sharemarket sweetheart by doing U-turns, but its chairman Graeme Milne remembers exactly where he did one on the Hamilton-Auckland highway 10 years ago.

It was 2009 and Synlait was in a corner.

The new dairy ingredients exporter had made a loss in its first year and had too much debt. It was under pressure from its banks and the global financial crisis (GFC) had paralysed debt markets.

But a golden opportunity in China was going begging. A food-safety scandal the previous year, when infant formula was poisoned with melamine, had fired huge demand for baby milk from safe producers like New Zealand.

“To get into the infant formula market – the most sensitive of all markets – takes years and years of trust to be built in the supply chain. But now the environment had changed and it looked like we could enter the infant formula market much faster than we’d otherwise have been able to,” recalls Milne from his home at Tamahere, near Hamilton.

Synlait needed equity to build a second, specialised drier for infant formula – and fast.

But after the GFC, “debt was a bad word”.

So Synlait, owned by Japanese company Mitsui, with 20 per cent, and a clutch of small private investors, decided to try to list, “even though the environment was terrible”, says Milne.

“We were too fresh, too young, too new, but we needed to do something. And the banks were pushing us. We went for the big bang, tried to raise $150 million. It was a really bad time – the company wasn’t launching it off a strong platform. We only had one year of results and one dryer operating.

“But we couldn’t give up.”

Long story short, Canterbury-based Synlait got its $150m in bids but not enough competition to reach the desired share price.

“The share price would’ve been too low and our existing shareholders would’ve been diluted away. So we made the very difficult decision not to accept the offers, to pull the IPO. John [Penno, then managing director] had flown up from Christchurch to our investment bankers and I was on my way to Auckland to sign the papers.

“I did a U-turn on the motorway and came home.”

Within six months, global market sentiment began stabilising and “early investors were getting brave and coming back to the market”, Milne recalls.

Time for Synlait to go back to the private placement market for equity. This time there was strong interest from several companies and the upshot was that China’s Bright Foods paid $82m for a nearly 51 per cent stake.

“We were willing to sell control … to get enough equity into the company and to get to a situation where our shareholders weren’t diluted too much and sufficient funds to build the next dryer,” says the Opotiki-born, Hawke’s Bay-reared Milne.

“We built the second infant formula dryer and got ourselves into the bulk infant formula market. That went successfully so we built a third dryer and now we’re building a fourth.”

And Synlait has since listed successfully – on the NZX in 2013 when Bright’s stake diluted to 39 per cent, and on the ASX in 2016.

Last year it was the best performing stock on the NZX and Synlait’s market capitalisation today is nudging $2 billion.

The company has been growing at 15-20 per cent a year since 2013, has moved from packaged bulk infant formula powder to consumer canned production, has a partnership with another sharemarket darling, a2 Milk – a 17 per cent shareholder – and is about to enter what it calls the “everyday” dairy market, producing homebrand milk and cream for supermarket chain Foodstuffs in the South Island.

The $125m plant being built at Synlait’s main site at Dunsandel, in Canterbury, to handle the move into the consumer dairy market can also make long-life cream, liquid infant formula and drinking yoghurts. Milne implies that Synlait is eyeing the North Island market but won’t elaborate.

Meanwhile, the company will make its North Island debut this year as a raw milk processor at Pokeno in the Waikato, and it has inked a deal to buy the South Island’s Talbot Forest Cheese company for up to $40m in August. Its environmental protection and sustainability initiatives lead the $17b dairy industry.

Synlait has made spectacular progress look easy. But Milne, chairman since the company’s earliest days and probably in his last term, shares the U-turn story because he knows better.

Getting this far has involved sleepless nights, difficult decisions, a lot of hard work building export customer and investor relationships, analysing markets, acquiring talent and building teams, and at times, dollops of courage.

As Milne recalls, when the genesis of Synlait Milk emerged in 2006-07 from a small group of separately-owned dairy farms, and contractors were engaged to build the first dairy factory, “we had nothing except a corner of one of the farms where we said we were going to build”.

“We didn’t have a pilot plant, we just built a commercial plant. So we didn’t have any samples from a pilot plant to say [to potential export customers] this is what the product will be like. We were going into a crowded market.”

But they had the dynamic and visionary John Penno, co-founder of the original Synlait Farms Ltd, founder of Synlait Milk and until last year, its managing director. He remains a director.

Penno did a fantastic job of meshing farmers, investors and the banks in those very early days when “everything was contingent on everything else”, says Milne, an experienced chief executive and director in a range of sectors, but with a solid pedigree in global dairy markets. He met Penno on a dairy industry advisory board and was asked for his ideas on making a dairy manufacturing debut.

Milne obliged with “one page of bullet points” and was asked to explain it to the fledgling Synlait board. “Next thing I was chairman”.

He’s kept a low profile – long his business style.

“Profile is for the company – for the benefit of the company and John was bloody good at that. I think the CEO is the front of the company.”

In 2019, Synlait is entering a new stage in its life. Now headed by ex-Fonterra senior executive Leon Clements as chief executive, it is still a growing company but “now it’s more about execution and building on the strategy”, says Milne.

No dividend has been paid yet, and is unlikely to be anytime soon.

“There are no immediate plans to pay a dividend. Like I say we are a growth company. I start every AGM pretty much saying that. The last AGM was the first I never got asked the question.”

“In September [2016] we raised $100m in a rights issue to make sure we had the platform for investing further. We have $500m of investment ahead. [We want] more equity, less debt. Our history is a bit too leveraged, and personally, I like to run companies conservatively.

“When you pay a dividend it doesn’t make the company worth more – it makes it worth less. Paying a dividend or not is not a positive or a negative. It’s other people’s money and you need to treat it responsibly.

“How I judge it is, if we have good ideas that we think will bring a great return on investment, we’ll keep the money and invest it for you. If we haven’t, we’ll give it to you.”

Milne says Synlait can handle the projected investment in new plant and infrastructure in the next two or three years without needing to raise more equity.

“If another thing came around the corner we thought worth doing in the immediate future, we are comfortable funding that with debt and earnings. There’s a lot of cash coming into the company.”

At the time of the rights issue, Synlait’s share price was $3.62. It has climbed as high as $13 and yesterday was trading around $9.90.

Milne says the stock moves around because it is held in big blocks and relatively thinly traded. It is sensitive to sentiment about China’s economy and export registration and approvals.

“We don’t have an opinion on the share price,” says Milne. “I say to the team, we run the company – not the share price. We run the top and bottom line of the company and the strategy, the sharemarket makes up its mind about what the share price is.”

As for Synlait being the best performing stock on the NZX last year, “I certainly don’t use those sort of statistics internally in the company”.

“We are building a company. It’s young and we are relatively exposed to infant formula, but we’re not just an infant formula company. We are building … in other categories and making sure we do that well so if there is a threat in one area, we have others. We want multiple sites in multiple sectors. But we don’t want to do too many things, we are a dairy company, but we do want to do things we can be very good at.

“We are not a yield stock and I tell shareholders that.”

Milne says that from day one he cautioned Synlait against entering the own-brand, fast-moving consumer goods market – and in 10 years the company hasn’t been tempted.

“Some people say you should capture as much of the value chain as possible and that’s true depending on what sector you’re in. But you’ve also got to cut your cloth and if you’re going to do things, you have to do them really well. We’ve done technical development of the product and we’ve done that well, so now we’re replicating that in the local market.

“I’m not saying we will never get into our own brand, but if we do it won’t be in sectors that compete with our own existing customers.

“There’s a desire to get into other parallel dairy-related sectors so that we can de-risk the company and at the same time work with branded partners. There’s profit to be made and we think we can do it well.

“If you’re entering a sector with existing players you have to be pretty damn sure you can do well and prosper. We did a lot of analysis.”

Looking ahead, Milne says he indicated last year that he doubted he would seek re-election in three years, but had agreed to stay on for the chief executive transition.

“There’s a general understanding [in governance] that if you’re there forever you can’t be independent. It’ll be a hard thing because Synlait is a nice company.”

Meanwhile, there will be a “comprehensive” external review of the board this year.

External board reviews are regular at Synlait but this one will look at bit deeper, he says.

“There’s an age and stage thing with everybody. We don’t want everyone shifting at once.”

Milne told the market Synlait should post a “substantial” increase in profit for the 2019 financial year but that the scale of the rise won’t be in the same league as last year’s 89 per cent.

Risk areas ahead include diversifying into new sectors as Synlait broadens into the crowded sports and adult nutrition sectors, and speed wobbles, he says.

“In a fast-growing company it’s easy not to service your employees as well as you should. Systems can get behind, there’s temporary accommodation and you could can easily disappoint staff.”

Within the next year, Synlait’s staff is expected to swell to nearly 900. Ten years ago it had about four.

“With anything over 10 to 15 per cent annual growth you have challenges – we have been growing at 15 to 20 per cent for a long time.”

Graeme Milne
• Former chief executive: NZ Dairy Group, Bonlac Australia, BayMilk, Richmond Meats. Former Dairy Board senior executive. Former chairman, Waikato District Health Board.
• Current chairman: Synlait Milk, TerraCare NZ, PF Olsen, Nyriad.
• On the management boards of Proform Plastics and Rimani Farms management.
• Director: Alliance Group, NZ Pharmaceuticals, Waikato University council.

Source: nzherald.co.nz

The US government’s dairy conundrum

The United States’ dairy surplus has reached a record high, rounding out at 1.4 billion pounds of cheese. Reports attempting to quantify this astonishing amount have deferred to metrics like “enough to wrap around the U.S. Capitol.” Suffice to say, nobody’s suggesting we could consume it all.

The nation eating this much cheese is not only mind-boggling: It’s growing less and less likely. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture data, Americans have cut their milk consumption down from 35 pounds to an average of 15 per person annually. The excess is turned into cheese for storage and longevity (and the enjoyment of delicious cheese products). At the same time, government subsidies have continued to support dairy production, buying up surplus to keep prices steady. That leaves us with more cheese than anyone, even the experts, knows what to do with.

“What has changed — and changed fairly noticeably and fairly recently — is people are turning away from processed cheese,” Cornell University agriculture economist Andrew Novakovic said in an interview with NPR. “It’s the same as it is for everything else: If you’ve got too much of something, the price has to go down until consumption rises.”

In the past, the U.S. government has supported dairy farmers through various programs and agencies, accumulating a staggering surplus with policies unique to this industry. What it’s done with that surplus has changed the American welfare state and diet forever.

Early direct promotion

The dairy industry has always had a close relationship with the USDA, from the formation of the country’s most powerful dairy lobby, the National Dairy Council, to initial attempts at regulation. As Pacific Standard recently reported:

After milk was first fortified with Vitamin D in the 1930s, the federal government’s inaugural public-health nutrition campaign promoted it as a miracle cure, a rite of passage, and, later, a means to support the troops in World Wars I and II, as outlined in anthropologist Andrea Wiley’s book Re-Imagining Milk. (Drink your milk and your vitamins: American efficiency in action.)

The federal government’s price supports, which maintain a minimum price for milk, grew out of what the New York Times describes as an “outgrowth of a Depression-era commitment” to a commodity that nutritionists once hailed as a “perfect food.” (This support is in addition to the $20 billion a year the government now spends on farm subsidies, according to the Cato Institute.) At the outset, these policies were intended to help a struggling industry. But as milk production surpassed demand, the government focused largely on attempts to control the boom and bust of the dairy industry’s glut — with little success.

Policymakers have left many of these supports in place. As a result, dairy legislation enacted in the 1930s remains largely unchanged, according to economists Eric Erba and Andrew Novakovic. Consumer demand, however, has not: Milk consumption has declined steadily since the 1970s, guided largely by new studies linking dairy to increased risk of health problems. Cheese has fared only slightly better.

Government cheese

Over the years, the government has gravitated toward one method of unloading dairy surplus: giving it to the poor.

In 1949, the Agricultural Act first gave the Commodity Credit Corporation, a government-owned agency created to stabilize farm incomes, authority to purchase dairy products. The corporation’s stockpile grew over the years — amassing 500 million pounds worth $4 billion across 35 warehouses — and so did public outrage. “Probably the cheapest and most practical thing would be to dump it in the ocean,” a USDA official told the told the Washington Post in 1981.

To clear out the CCC’s surplus under the Reagan administration, the USDA created the Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program, which “helps supplement the diets of low-income Americans.” At the time, that help took the form of “government cheese,” which was distributed to poor seniors en masse. According to History, the five-pound blocks of cheese were neon orange and sometimes moldy, with a taste like Velveeta.

Today, the government unloads its surplus through several public benefit programs. Thanks to decades of USDA policy, milk is firmly embedded in the federal dietary guidelines, school lunches, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

But it’s still not enough to manage the surplus. In 2016, farmers poured out tens of millions of gallons of excess milk onto fields and into pools of manure, the Wall Street Journal reported. And the buyouts continue: That same year, the USDA announced a new plan to purchase $20 million of cheddar cheese to deal with the then-record surplus, “while assisting food banks and other food assistance recipients” — the latest of many bailouts for the industry. In 2018, the USDA said it would also buy more fresh fluid milk to distribute to the Emergency Food Assistance Program, unrelated to the buyouts.

Fast food companies

Americans can only eat so much cheese (35 pounds a year, according to USDA data). But while marketing surplus directly to consumers has its limits, company partnerships have had greater success.

To help sell its surplus in the 1990s, the National Dairy Promotion Board created Dairy Management Incorporated, a semi-public marketing branch of the USDA funded through government “checkoff” fees from dairy producers. This agency gave us the “Got Milk?” campaign and a host of popular fast food menu items, including Domino’s seven-cheese pizzas and Taco Bell’s very cheesy Quesalupa. A 2017 Bloomberg Businessweek investigation called the group of chemists and nutritionists the “Illuminati of cheese.” “The checkoff [program] puts DMI’s agents inside Burger King, Domino’s, McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, and Wendy’s, where they’re privy to each restaurant chain’s most closely guarded trade secrets,” writes Clint Rainey.

For a federal agency dedicated to improving overall nutrition and providing dietary guidance, these partnerships may seem like a contradiction — with good reason, experts say. DMI’s efforts “impose health costs on Americans generally, but disproportionately harm low-income African Americans and Latinos who live in urban centers dominated by fast food restaurants,” argues legal scholar and food oppression expert Andrea Freeman in a 2013 report.

All the Taco Bells in the nation cannot solve the record-breaking surplus. In recent years, producers have turned their focus to foreign markets, in the hopes that the government can pass this glut onto other countries. But as Novakovic points out, the demand worldwide is not for processed American cheese. It’s for the “specialty, European-style” variety (and perhaps, the occasional Quesalupa).

Source: theweek.com

McKinsey & Company Study Provides Winning Growth Formula for Dairy

Groundbreaking Research Captures Four Strategies for Success in Domestic, International Markets

Modest growth forecasts, shifting consumer tastes and increased domestic competition mean dairy executives will need to look for new models at home and abroad to capture growth, according to new research from McKinsey & Company released today at Dairy Forum 2019 in Orlando, Fla. In a presentation to nearly 1,000 dairy executives from across the country, McKinsey consultants concluded that future growth in the competitive dairy landscape will require a bold outlook and a winning combination of new strategies.

Today’s presentation, “Resilience and Growth: Perspectives from McKinsey & Company,” revealed independent research that McKinsey conducted last fall, in partnership with the International Dairy Foods Association. It captures insights from in-depth interviews with 30 CEOs of international dairy companies and findings from a survey of more than 1,000 American households to chart the consumer preferences that are shaping the domestic dairy market.

“The success of our industry lies in our ability to partner together to move dairy forward. Sharing these findings at IDFA’s Dairy Forum, the industry’s largest gathering, provided an excellent capstone to our deep discussion of dairy’s future,” said Michael Dykes, D.V.M., IDFA president and CEO. “This is just the start of the way we’ll use these findings to transform our industry for continued prosperity.”

“With the right mix of scale and innovation, the industry can use these data-driven strategies to transform opportunities into advantages, secure new pockets of U.S. market growth and prepare for long-term success in international markets,” said Roberto Uchoa de Paula, senior partner at McKinsey and presenter at Dairy Forum 2019.

Uchoa de Paula, along with Ludovic Meilhac, partner, and Christina Adams, associate partner, told Dairy Forum attendees that U.S. dairy manufacturers have the option of chasing international opportunities or competing for share in their home market, which is increasingly competitive and slow growing.

Based on the research, the consultants believe U.S. dairy companies should consider four strategic responses – innovating to capture domestic growth, revamping the supply chain to serve a new type of demand, exporting to markets with high projected dairy deficits and attractive trade agreement groundwork, and investing directly in deficit markets to maximize long-term success– to create a winning growth formula for dairy.

Dairy companies are better positioned to compete in the domestic dairy environment, the consultants said, if they adopt a strategy that combines innovation that supports a diverse range of consumer preferences along with a revamped supply chain to serve new types of demand.

Dairy companies can meet these new demands by strategically responding to six major factors shaping the market: Consumers’ desire to explore new or different brands and experiences, the growing volume of consumer data and highly personalized microsegments, the proliferation of smaller brands, consumers’ focus on health and wellness, the shifting retail landscape and rising commercial costs.

Tactics that comprise a winning strategy, the consultants said, include a focus on identifying growth spaces through analytics, making quick and small investments instead of big bets and investing in new supply chain capabilities.

However, even the most impressive innovators will be hard pressed to gain major growth at home, the consultants said. Their findings revealed that globally focused companies have increased their revenues significantly from 2007 to 2018, while those active in local markets have seen their revenues fall. Dairy’s future is global, the consultants stressed, and the greatest gains lie in markets beyond American borders, primarily in Africa and Asia.

U.S. dairy companies with an international presence will need to pursue a two-pronged strategy to expand their global footprint, the consultants said. Dairy companies must first adopt a strong defensive strategy to maintain their footholds abroad, proactively managing risk with a robust tool kit of financial and demand-hedging tools. Companies must also play offense, capturing growth not only by focusing on growing exports, but also by devising a long-term strategy for developing capital, talent and products.

When defensive risk management and proactive investment are combined, the consultants said, companies can unlock a positive cycle of global growth.

McKinsey & Company will soon release a white paper, “A winning growth formula for dairy,” that highlights the research findings and suggested responses in more detail. Interested parties may contact Heather Soubra, IDFA chief of staff, at hsoubra@idfa.org to request a copy.

 

Source: IDFA

CWT Assists with 3 million Pounds of Dairy Product Export Sales

Cooperatives Working Together (CWT) member cooperatives accepted 15 offers of export assistance from CWT that helped them capture sales contracts for 2.932 million pounds (2,020 metric tons) of Cheddar, Monterey Jack and Gouda cheese, and 83,776 pounds (38 metric tons) of butter to customers in Asia, Central America, the Middle East, and Oceania. The product will be delivered during the period from January through July 2019.

CWT-assisted member cooperative export sales for the first two weeks of 2019 total 7.385 million pounds of American-type cheeses, 537,928 pounds of butter (82% milkfat) and 1.124 million pounds of whole milk powder to 13 countries in six regions. These sales are the equivalent of 88.5 million pounds of milk on a milkfat basis.

Assisting CWT members through the Export Assistance program positively affects all U.S. dairy farmers and all dairy cooperatives by strengthening and maintaining the value of dairy products that directly impact their milk price. It does this by helping member cooperatives gain and maintain world market share for U.S dairy products. As a result, the program has significantly expanded the total demand for U.S. dairy products and the demand for U.S. farm milk that produces those products.

The amounts of dairy products and related milk volumes reflect current contracts for delivery, not completed export volumes. CWT pays export assistance to the bidders only when export and delivery of the product is verified by required documentation.

Branded milk could offer brighter future for UK dairy industry

“The white stuff is knackered,” pronounced dairy market analyst Chris Walkland, on the state of margins in the UK liquid milk market.

“We need to grow the size of the cake,” added Mr Walkland, who is an advocate of increasing milk retail prices to raise farmgate returns for dairy farmers.

Mr Walkland said that margins were believed to be only about 1% for milk processors on liquid milk, so growing producer milk cheques would require shoppers paying more at the till.

British consumers would be willing to pay more for milk, according to a 2016 YouGov survey.

The study, undertaken in conjunction with AHDB Consumer Insights, found that 80% of shoppers would be willing to spend more to provide producers with a fairer return, with 19% indicating they would happily pay more than 20p extra for four pints of milk.

Consumers have also shown their willingness to pay higher prices for milk, through Morrisons’ Milk for Farmers, which returns a 10p/litre premium to Morrisons’ Arla dairy farmer-suppliers.

Since October 2015, shoppers have purchased nearly 1bn litres of Milk for Farmers, returning an extra £12m to farmers’ pockets.

Milk in decline

The commoditisation of milk and its retail in “no frills” plastic containers in supermarkets is stifling excitement and innovation in dairy, according to journalist and Nuffield scholar, Tom Levitt.

“The market for milk is evolving, not disappearing, but milk has lost its monopoly,” says Mr Levitt, who undertook a two-year study of branded milk across seven countries.

“The problem is, held back by low margins in milk. the sector had been slow to adapt to the trends and desires of a new generation of consumers.”

He said that consumers were turned-off by red, blue and green plastic cartons of milk and the ugly metal trollies.

Some businesses had adapted to capitalise on the fact that 80% of UK consumers regularly bought milk, he says.

“People are willing to pay more for branded and innovative milk products.”

Mr Levitt pointed to the recent boom in popularity of kefir – a fermented dairy product half way between milk and yoghurt.

A 250ml bottle of branded kefir retails at a minimum of £1, a mark-up over standard liquid milk of more than 700% and already sells 16m bottles a year.

“[Kefir’s] biggest consumer base is slimming women, exactly the consumer that we are told is most likely to be avoiding dairy,” he added.

The only sustainable future for the industry is to turn milk into a more valuable and attractive product that consumers will be willing to spend more money on, warned Mr Levitt.

Target market

Generation Z – those aged between three and 23 – are the group that the industry needs to target, according to new Arla UK chief executive Ash Amirahmadi.

“This group aren’t necessarily against dairy, they are just more excited by plant-based at the moment.

“We just need to give them a reason to find dairy more exciting.”

Mr Amirahmadi said Arla’s future consumer strategy would be based around increasing the size of the pie through innovation of dairy products, urging other processors to follow Arla’s lead.

“We have to innovate products around milk. Milk is not just milk.”

“We have to modernise the category and appeal to young women. If we can do this, we will appeal to anyone out there.

“Lots of dairy companies need to produce products that consumers want to pay more money for.”

The Arla UK boss said that consumers need to be reminded that dairy is food in its own right, rather than an accompaniment to the likes of tea and cereal.

Branded milk in practice

Going it alone and launching an independent dairy brand has come with a whole series of challenges, but allowed Nemi milk to maintain full control of its brand direction, says Nemi director Andrew Henderson.

The brand, which retails at £1.49 for a two-litre bottle, is busy growing its UK liquid milk alongside developing its presence in global markets and already exports to the Middle East.

“We were offered a partnership with a major processor in the early days, but they wanted to own the brand.

“We didn’t want to end up like Innocent Smoothies selling themselves [to Coca-Cola] so we turned them down and have done things ourselves.”

Mr Henderson, a dairy nutritionist by trade, says this has allowed him to develop his selenium-enriched milk within his own ethics and, crucially, retained the power to pay his dairy farmer suppliers a fair return.

“We have never paid less than 30p/litre for any Nemi milk throughout the past two-and-a-half years,” he says.

Trying to enter a market dominated by the UK’s two largest processors has its challenges, adds Mr Henderson, citing the need for substantial start-up capital and access to existing transport logistics as his two biggest headaches.

“You need to know who your customers are and how you are going to get the milk to them. Logistics are crucial.”

Who is getting milk branding right?

Our Cow Molly

Sheffield-based dairy Our Cow Molly was launched in response to diminishing returns of the UK dairy processor market.

The brand prides itself on the freshness of its milk, with shorter supply chains meaning milk is on shelf in hours rather than days. The brand currently supplies several local coffee shops and in 2016 struck a deal to supply the Co-op in the town’s stores.

Fairlife milk

US dairy farmers Sue and Mike McCloskey created Fairlife to add value to their milk and highlight its nutritional and welfare benefits. In 2012, Fairlife went into a distribution partnership with Coca-Cola.

The product has 50% more protein, 30% more calcium and 50% less sugar than ordinary milk. The brand adds value by offering full traceability of its milk as well as interacting with consumers online and in person. Its farm has been branded as “the Disneyland” of agricultural tourism.

The brand retails at almost twice the price of regular milk at £2.20/litre.

C’est qui le patron? [Who is the boss?]

A French milk brand that has, since 2015, expanded into a number of other products, including pizza and apple juice, having sold more than 50m litres of milk.

The brand established a “fair price” for farmers by holding a consumer survey, where shoppers could choose how much they valued milk and therefore would be willing to pay farmers for it.

They chose €0.39/litre (35p/litre), which was 26% more than the average price. The brand, just 18 months old, is now in most major French supermarkets.

 

Source: Farmers Weekly

Fonterra’s big problem of needing to be right

OPINION: Apparently, there’s been a big shake-up at Fonterra.

The old executives are gone, and some even older executives got promoted. Farmers fired some of the directors and re-elected some other, old directors again. They also made an old director the new chairman.

The problem with Fonterra is they only employ the best, most intelligent, educated and competent people.

These people are high achievers and they are used to being successful.

You don’t see Fonterra executives in the wild very often. Occasionally we get a glimpse of one doing a radio or television interview.

Looking at them, it’s like there’s someone holding a gun against their back. About to pull the trigger if the executive makes a wrong move or worse, an admission they may have made a bad decision once in their unblemished lives.

Each word is carefully considered, just the right amount of professionalism and corporate speak. All the time making sure they don’t actually say anything, to ensure they won’t say something wrong.

Being wrong to these types of people is a very bad thing indeed.

These high-achieving people tend to succeed in life because they are so damn talented.

They just do things better than the rest of us.

It’s great to have these people on your team, but too many have some downsides. Intelligent and competent people are used to being right and being right has always worked for them.

The problem with being right is it also means your mind is closed. You’re not open to new ideas if you believe you are right.

Being right is based upon knowledge and experience. Knowledge is drawn from the past which makes it easily provable and safe.

Experience is built from the solutions that were used to solve the problems of the past.

The problem with people who have experience is they rely on it. They overrate its relevance.

They try to shoehorn the solutions of the past into solving the problems of the future.

Knowledge and experience are technically out of date.

Of course, knowledge and experience are valuable and critical to success. But we should be aware that knowledge is the opposite of originality, and experience is the opposite of creativity.

If you’re scoring 10 on knowledge and experience, that leaves no room for originality and creativity.

Fonterra employs an army of PR agents to communicate to the public and even their own farmers.

Being right is very important to these people, they need to control the message so nothing can go wrong.

But if you don’t mind being wrong, suddenly anything is possible.

You don’t need to be infallible anymore. You can just tell the truth. In this environment, there are so many more options, so many more possibilities.

Of course, there’s no way of knowing what’s going to happen. Things could get wild really quickly. But there’s a good chance something amazing will happen, too.

This is where smart, competent people come in handy. They create order from the chaos and make it all work, which makes them tolerable.

Anything that is amazing, new, fresh and exciting is still hidden from view. These things haven’t been discovered yet.

The discovery of amazing things requires originality and creativity to uncover them. It also requires that you must be wrong more than you are right. It’s risky being wrong. Many people avoid risk at all costs.

People who won’t take risks are trying to preserve what they have.

Fonterra is owned by 10,000 risk-averse dairy farmers.The last thing they want is “wild”, “new” and “amazing”. They’re trying to preserve their land, their wealth, their way of doing things and their way of life.

Fonterra HQ is filled with high achievers all preserving their careers, high pay packets and self-worth.

These stakeholders have a lot to lose and people with a lot to lose don’t take risks.

The irony is, this aversion to risk is likely to be the riskiest approach to take in today’s world.

Successful inter-generational companies are not afraid to reinvent themselves, even when it means cannibalising their existing business.

Kodak and Fuji Film were two identical companies who approached the future differently. Only one exists today.

The least risky thing to do is to let go of the past and the old ways of doing things and embrace the freshness of the new world.

Dairy has a big part to play, it just has to be done differently.

Fonterra should start hiring some people who are going to cause a ruckus.

Glen Herud is founder of Happy Cow Milk Company.

 

Source: Stuff

No end in sight for dairy farmer struggling with loan issue

Bill Smith was only notified in August that his farm loan matured last March, leading to problems.

The impact of the government shutdown is real for Reynoldsville, Pa., dairy farmer Bill Smith.

He was having problems with his local USDA Farm Service Agency long before the shutdown, but his situation has gotten worse since the shutdown began.

Smith is the fifth generation on his dairy farm, which is located along Interstate 80. He has a milking herd of 120 registered Holsteins and prides himself in showing cattle, including winners at the All-American Dairy Show in Harrisburg, Pa.

In August, when Smith realized that his Margin Protection Program payment had not arrived, he called his local Farm Service Agency office. He learned, to his dismay, that he was delinquent on his FSA loan.

“How could I be delinquent?” he said in a recent phone interview. “They take their money out of my milk check before I even get it.”

According to the records, he was delinquent, and FSA stopped his MPP payment. In March 2010, the Smith family dairy applied for and received a loan that had to be paid back over the next seven years. This helped Smith during a difficult time with low milk prices.

Fast forward to March 2018. The loan matured, and Smith did not apply for a new loan. He says FSA did not contact him to let him know that the loan was about to come due.

“I didn’t get a letter or an email or anything,” he says.

Since that time, FSA reorganized, and Smith’s file was moved to a new loan officer in another office about an hour and a half away from his farm. He says the staff in this new office has not been as responsive, which has caused him stress as he only learned in August that his loan matured in March and that he was about to lose his farm.

When he asked why FSA had not contacted him before the loan came due, Smith says he was told that the office could not show partiality by notifying him.

Situation gets worse
The question became, what did he have to do to correct the situation?

In September, a new loan officer came to his farm and helped him fill out an application and other paperwork that was needed.

A month later, Smith was asked to come to the FSA office so employees could get a better grasp of his situation.

“I called my previous (FSA) loan officer and asked what they would have done,” he says. “I was told that they would have come in March of 2017 to begin to rewrite the loan. I was told that what I had was a supervised loan that required FSA to visit the farm several times a year. That wasn’t happening.”

Thanksgiving came and went, and he still had not received any information on whether his application would be accepted. Part of the process requires the farmer to come up with a cash flow statement and projections for the coming year. Making those projections is difficult, he says, especially considering the current dairy market.

He also learned that if he accepted any more federal program money it would go straight to paying off the loan. Therefore, he couldn’t use it for any farm purposes.

Finally, on Dec. 20, the Thursday before Christmas, he got a call from the FSA loan officer. They were ready to close on the loan. But Smith was told to get an attorney so that the closing could take place.

“I lost it,” he says. “They had to be kidding. How was I going to get an attorney a few days before Christmas and get the paperwork done before the first of the year?”

Smith did call his attorney, who is also a friend, and arrangements were made to have the paperwork emailed from the FSA office to his attorney by 8 a.m. the next day.

“My attorney said that he would work on the paperwork on Friday and that my wife and I and representatives of FSA should be in the attorney’s office at 8 a.m. on Saturday,” he says.

The meeting was held, but no one from FSA showed up. Smith surmises that they didn’t show up because it was Saturday. But the federal government shutdown, the result of a disagreement between President Donald Trump and Congress on funding for a border wall, commenced at midnight on Saturday, Dec. 22.

His local FSA office was closed. Now, Smith continues to wait.

USDA recalled 2,500 Farm Service Agency employees to reopen offices during normal business hours on Thursday, Jan. 17; Friday, Jan. 18; and Tuesday, Jan. 22 to assist producers with existing farm loans and to ensure the agency provides 1099 tax documents to borrowers by the IRS deadline.

Frank Urbanick, FSA farm loan manager in western Pennsylvania, says the office is completing work from 2018 and is taking names of people to contact once the office is open again. Urbanick did not comment on Smith’s situation.

It’s unclear whether or not his office reopened.

To make matters worse, his skid-steer loader recently broke down and one of the restrictions on the loan is that he must contact FSA for any expenditure over $5,000.

“I can call, but I will get a recording that they are not there,” he says. “What am I supposed to do?”

Smith and his family were able to put all of this aside for a few days as he and his wife went to Harrisburg to see their second son, Justin, receive his Keystone Farmer Degree at the FFA Mid-Winter Convention during the Pennsylvania Farm Show.

“It is good to get away from the farm for a little while,” Smith says.

 

Source: Farm Progress

Are retailers destroying the dairy industry?

At a time when thousands of U.S. dairy operators of all sizes are starved for revenue, declaring bankruptcy or selling off multi-generational operations, the latest inequity is a particularly cruel twist of the knife.

Squeezed on virtually every front — multi-front trade wars, eroding international markets, government shutdowns, etc. — the entire dairy sector is feeling the vice tighten even more from a direction they never anticipated — the retail sector.

According to the National Dairy Products Sales Report, the December Class III cheese price was 27.4 cents (or 16.6 percent) lower than December 2017.

However, the U.S. retail average price for cheddar cheese in December, according to CPI data, was 41 cents (or 8.3 percent) higher than December 2017.

That gap — the difference between what consumers are paying and what dairymen are earning — is just one factor contributing to a national cheese glut of 1.4 million pounds of cheddar. As National Public Radio’s WBUR in Boston recently pointed out, that amounts to 900,000 cubic yards of excess cheese, enough to form a wheel as large as Washington, D.C.

Even as supermarkets are selling cheese at artificially high prices, the dairy producer is earning only 25.6 percent of the average retail price — the lowest proportion since April 2012.

There’s no magic bullet on the horizon: A shakeout will continue in the dairy sector until markets stabilize, and supply and demand realign. Until then, dairy professionals at all levels are working on a day-by-day, if not hour-by-hour, basis to keep their operations afloat. Cheese sales will be a critical component of that eventual rebound.

Over the last decade, significantly more fluid milk has been manufactured into cheese, butter and other products, due in a large part to the continuous reduction in domestic fluid milk consumption. Fluid milk sales have fallen about 13 percent during that time, while sales of products, such as butter and cheese, are increasing.

From field to fork, every business that touches the American food chain must guard against self-inflicted wounds. Now, more than ever.

No business can control the outside forces that have a corrosive effect on its revenues but taking steps that erode consumer confidence can leave a particularly damaging legacy.

It’s a discouraging predicament: Even though consumer demand for cheese is high, production costs are low and wholesale costs are optimal, the dairy industry — producers, processors and affiliated industries — are being cut out of profits by retailers. Consumer-facing price gouging couldn’t come at a worse time for an already burdened industry.

Laurie Fischer is the CEO of the American Dairy Coalition.

—From American Dairy Coalition news release

Dairy farmers could soon be breeding cows for lower methane emissions

Ground-breaking research is set to give dairy farmers the tools to breed cows with lower methane emission has received significant funding from Science Foundation Ireland.

Teagasc researcher Dr Sinead McParland, was awarded over €375,000 in a Starting Investigator Research Grant to develop tools to identify the most efficient and profitable cows in the national herd.

According to Dr McParland, global growth in demand for dairy products currently exceeds supply and this is anticipated to continue.

Efficient cows, which have higher milk solids output per unit input, are required to help meet this shortfall.

However, she says it is not possible to identify the most efficient cows using currently available tools.

“The research will address the seismic challenge we face to breed more efficient animals (producing more milk from less input) with a lower environmental hoof-print.”

McParland said the current tools which evaluate the efficiecy of cows are very laborious and expensive to operate.

Therefore, to-date, she says they are typically only used in research centres, and the numbers of records we can attain each lactation and the number of individual animals recorded remains small.

“In order to include traits such as efficiency and emissions in our breeding programme, we need lots of unbiased data on as wide a representation of the national herd that is possible,” she said.

“We will use information generated as part of routine milk recording to predict intake, efficiency and methane emissions.

Milk recording, (in Ireland and globally) is operated by taking a small sample of milk (40-50ml) from individual cows during milking 4-12 times across the lactation.

The samples are sent to a laboratory where they are processed by a fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy machine.

The machine shines light through the sample at over 1,000 wavelengths, and the absorption of light through the milk at particular wavelengths is used to determine the fat and protein content of the milk.

The same process is applied to all bulk tank samples analysed for milk composition.

According to Dr McParland recent research (by Teagasc and collaborators) has shown that the spectrum generated to predict the macro fat and protein composition can be used to predict the energy intake of cows as well as methane emissions.

“We aim to build on this initial research to build the most accurate equations in order to capture this data from all milk recorded animals and feed this data into the national genetic evaluations.

“Farmers involved in routine milk recording will have these data recorded on their individual animals enabling them to identify their most efficient, lowest emitting animals.

“If the project is successful and the traits of efficiency and emissions are included in the breeding goal, all farmers will benefit through a national goal that is genetically selecting for more efficient, environmentally sustainable animals,” she said.

Source: independent.ie

Eight years on, one dollar milk is still crippling Australian dairy farmers

On January 26, 2011, Australian supermarket heavyweight Coles began a war for market share against arch-rival Woolworths.

Promoting a strategy for the benefit of shoppers through price cuts, Coles had already slashed the price of more than 5,000 grocery staples under its Down Down campaign, in some cases making up for the cuts through its own funds. The idea of a round-number discount had appealed to the supermarket’s marketeers behind the move and decided to apply it to white milk.

At the time, surging demand was causing milk prices to rise. Coles said it would cover the cost of the discount itself, while also trimming its margin substantially, from 20 cents to as low as 3 cents. The discount, it said, would save consumers A$1m (US$714,000) a week.

But experts cautioned that one dollar milk would have a big impact on Australian dairy farmers. They warned that northern farmers, who mainly sell their milk domestically, would be particularly badly affected, while the price of branded milk would also inevitably fall over time.

Backlash

The backlash from the move was swift and unprecedented. A defiant Coles was hauled up by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and a Senate inquiry within months.

Coles’ customers rightly expect us to keep prices for essential grocery items as low as possible. We will continue to put the interests of our customers first, by delivering on our commitment to offer quality and value ,” Ian McLeod, then managing director, said at the time.

In 2016, increased milk production in the EU led to the price paid back to farmers at the farmgate being significantly slashed. In 2014, Coles’ backed farmer-controlled co-op Murray Goulburn Group with a 10-year private label milk supply contract.

Though this appeared to be an excellent public relations move to show the supermarket’s support for the industry, MG almost collapsed through being forced to cut its milk prices by 15% to below the cost of production.

Helped expansion

At around the A$1.30 mark, the average price of white milk is now cheaper than bottled water and soft drinks, taking into account private label and branded prices.

On the other hand, some processors that have secured supermarket supply contracts have been vocal about how this has helped them expand.

Norco chef executive Brett Kelly credited his cooperative’s deal with Coles for an unprecedented earnings growth, allowing the business to move into the Chinese market. By the same token, the security that comes with contracts to supply milk to supermarkets certainly helps absorb the blow of global price downturns.

Boutique supermarket chain Harris Farm Markets even saw a way to turn expensive milk into a marketing tool. In 2016, it announced it would no longer sell one dollar milk, and announced a deal with Norco to start supplying under the new “Farmer Friendly Milk ” label.

Its chief executive said at the time he believed customers would be happy to accept a 14.5% price hike if the extra money goes to dairy farmers.

Helping farmers

In fairness, supermarkets have made moves to help struggling farmers.

Coles launched milk in Victoria under the Farmers’ Fund brand. For every two liter bottle of Farmers’ Fund milk sold at Coles supermarkets across Victoria, 40 cents is contributed to a dairy industry fund that delivers grants to farmers. The supermarket also operates similar funds with industry groups in other parts of Australia.

Woolworths, meanwhile, sells Farmers Own brand milk which is sourced through negotiated supply contracts with dairy collectives that are paid a premium over the average farm-gate price.

Coles and Woolworths also increased the price of 3-liter containers of milk from A$3 to A$3.30 (US$2.14-US$2.36) and have promised to donate the entire increase to farmers affected by drought.

A December 2017 ACCC ruling found supermarkets selling home-brand one dollar milk are not to blame for Australian dairy farmers being paid low farm-gate prices.

Instead it pointed at a power imbalance between farmers and milk processors, and called for a mandatory code of conduct to strengthen farmers’ bargaining power and improve their share of profits.

Draft clauses for that code were released this month and have been cautiously welcomed by dairy farmers. Under the code, all processors will be forced to release a standard form milk price agreement on a set date each year.

More price wars

But all this may be too little, too late, not least the newly priced supermarket milk. It is estimated that only about 13% of the milk produced by Australian dairy farms ends up as fresh milk. At the same time, most milk production goes to cheese, which is at the heart of a new supermarket war.

At A$6.90 (US$4.93) for a kilo block of Coles home brand cheddar, assuming that 10 liters of milk are used to make it, the cost of the raw materials alone would be under 70 cents per liter of milk before any other price factors are taken into account.

This year will be a crucial one for dairy farmers. Low farm gate prices and crippling drought have led to mounting numbers of them going out of business. Speaking to the ABC, one even predicted that half of his colleagues in New South Wales will go broke this year.

The cost of milk, just to source the feed alone, is $1.30 per liter ,” he told the broadcaster. The only salvation would come from a bump in farm gate prices or a break to the drought, he said.

Neither of these seems likely in the near future.

Source: dairyreporter.com

Regulators Sign Off on Dairy Farm in Northwestern Indiana

Indiana regulators have a granted a key permit for an organic dairy farm that could become home to more than 4,000 cows in Newton County.

Natural Prairie Dairy says its cows will graze on alfalfa and grass that hasn’t been treated with synthetic herbicides or pesticides. Critics, including the Hoosier Environmental Council, fear the northwestern Indiana farm could harm wells and reduce property values.

The site is near The Nature Conservancy’s Kankakee Sands natural area . But the Indiana Department of Environmental Management says Natural Prairie has presented a satisfactory plan to deal with manure, which will be used as fertilizer.

Kim Ferraro, a lawyer with the Hoosier Environmental Council, tells The (Northwest Indiana) Times that the state’s decision is “irresponsible.” Dairy manager Will De Jong says planning has improved, based on “listening to our neighbors.”

Source: WPTA21

U.S. Stocks of Dairy Products Remain Large But Begin to Dip

Milk production during 2018’s final quarter is projected to post the smallest year-over-year increase since 2015. November output was up 0.8% year-over-year, and the quarterly tally should come in below that increase, assuming milk cow inventories and cow productivity maintain recent trends. A consequence of moderating milk supplies has been reductions in burdensome frozen stocks of dairy products.

End-of-November inventories of butter were down 6 million pounds from 2017’s, the first decline from a year earlier since March. Butter inventories started November up 13 million pounds over the previous year, which followed September’s jump, which was the biggest increase of the year (up 27 million pounds from a year earlier). Butter prices (wholesale, AA Chicago Mercantile) averaged within a penny of $2.25 per pound from September throughout November. According to USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) calculations, domestic butter use was up 1% from a year ago during September and October. November dairy product production data was not released as scheduled due to the government shutdown, but butter production in the latest reported month was down a fraction of percent from a year earlier. The decline in butter inventory during November hints at production falling short of a previous year by a wider margin than in October.

Similar, but more pronounced, trends are occurring in the milk powder market. Non-fat dry milk inventories at the end of October dropped to the lowest levels since March 2017, a decline of 20% from a year earlier. Inventories of non-fat dry milk during the last quarter of 2017 were record-large, surpassing year earlier volumes by about 50%. Even with this year’s decline in milk powder storage, inventories will still be the second largest volume ever for the fourth quarter of the year; exceeding stocks in years prior to 2017 by at least 15-20%. To curtail stocks, non-fat dry milk prices have averaged below 90 cents per pound since September of last year. Low prices have discouraged production (down by at least 10% from a year ago in since July) and encouraged exports (on a pace to be up 20% from a year ago for 2018). Non-fat dry milk prices have approached 95 cents per pound in December, the highest values since June 2017.

Source: LMIC

Australia Day celebrations marred by the anniversary of $1 litre milk

On January 26 2011, dairy farmers across Australia woke to news that changed the face of the industry.

In truly un-Australian fashion, the then Coles director of merchandise John Durkan and CEO Ian McLeod felt $1 a litre private label milk had a nice ring to it and decided to announce milk price cuts – on Australia Day.

Under the pretence that the price cut helped the average Australian shopper, the strategy was, in truth, designed to take market share from Woolworths and the up-and-coming new kids on the block, Aldi.

At the time, Coles was warned of the potential consequences to the dairy industry but insisted that keeping prices down for customers was more important. At the time they also argued that farmgate prices and price paid to processors were fair.

Fast forward to 2016 – the virtual collapse of Murray Goulburn due to mismanagement and the increased milk production in the EU, meant that the price paid back to farmers at the farmgate was significantly slashed.

And now here we are 2019 and our industry is still in crisis.

Australia Day should be cause for celebration. It is a timely reminder of the importance of mateship, fairness and the necessity to be as one in times of trouble.

We live in a land of highs and lows; of drought and flood. It has always been our perseverance and strength of character that has seen us through. Despite everything, most of us wouldn’t want to live anywhere else.

We have seen the Australian spirit shine with the amount of public donations, business and community support right across the country to our farmers doing it tough in these drought conditions.

Even though the new head of Coles, Steven Cain, is another import from the UK, we ask that he embrace the Australian ethos and put an end to $1/litre milk.

 

Source: Queensland Country Life

Ohio dairy farms are disappearing

Third-generation Brown Township dairy farmer Jeff Knoop goes about milking his herd recently

While the $1 gallon of milk may be a boon for the consumer, it’s been a bust for the American dairy industry’s small to mid-sized farmers.

Small to mid-size dairies across Ohio and the country are shutting their doors in record numbers after nearly four years of low milk prices and rising operating expenses.

According to Dianne Shoemaker, a field specialist and dairy production economics professor with The Ohio State University, the exit at the end of 2018 was “enormous.”

In October 2018, there were 2,130 dairy farms in Ohio. To date, 2,045 dairy farms remain— a total of 85 dairy farms called it quits in Ohio in three months.

“That’s enormous. It’s not just small farms, it’s medium size farms and large farms … a lot of these are closed for good,” she said.

For one local Miami County family, four straight years of low milk prices means walking away from their prized registered herd, leaving behind an agricultural lifestyle that has been in their family for generations.

Jeff and Kathy Knoop of Fletcher shared how they, too, will join the national dairy farm “exodus.” The Knoop family has operated a dairy farm for generations, starting with Jeff’s grandfather John, then his father Hugh.

With low milk prices and no indication of improvement for the commodity, the Knoop dairy, which has 64 milking stalls all full at one time, started the process to down size last fall and eventually will bow out in 2019.

According to the USDA census and statistics, Miami County had 25 dairies in 1997; 27 in 2002; 21 in 2007; and 15 in 2012. According to Amanda Bennett, OSU Miami County extension field specialist, nine dairies remain in Miami County to date.

“Overall, it’s a national issue. The dairy industry is starting year four of very depressed milk prices and farms can only hang on so long if they aren’t making money,” Shoemaker said. “The bottom line is we have too much milk — too many cows and too much milk.”

Jeff Knoop shared their farm’s break-even milk price is $16-17 per hundred pounds, today’s price is about $14.44 per hundred pounds. When prices dropped to $12 per hundred pounds last February, Kathy thought there had been a mistake in their bi-weekly milk check. It was shortly after the family sat down to plan for their exit out of the business for good.

“Financially, they have to make me money. I have to make a living out of it and it’s not happening,” Jeff said. “The co-ops will say it’s the milk surplus and it’s now a global market. Not just the United States figures into this, but our world figures into this. Personally, I don’t believe that. You don’t have a choice because that’s what they are telling you. That’s where it’s at.”

Jeff said he felt the downturn in 2009 when grain prices spiked, devastating the dairy industry, noting the last time the dairy industry was “good” was in the mid-’90s up through 2005, before its slow descent.

“Everything in the dairy industry has always went in cycles. You had several years of really good milk prices and then it’d go down and it’s just been down the last eight years,” Jeff said.

Jeff said no silage was planted or harvested to feed their dairy herd to prepare for 2019. The Knoops sold half of their milking cows to a Mennonite farmer in Chillicothe last October. Kathy shared how watching half their cow herd leave the farm was an emotional day. Jeff, visibly upset, just shakes his head as he continues setting up to milk the rest of the herd.

Knoop said the remaining cows will be fed out until the silage is depleted. The rest of the cows will likely be sold at a livestock yard in DeGraff unless another buyer steps in.

Jeff looked down the line of cows, knowing their worth in their prime, shakes his head and stated, “I can’t even give them away.”

Like the majority of small to mid-sized dairy farmers, it’s a family operation passed down from generation-to-generation. The Knoops milking operation is located on his father Hugh’s farm in Brown Township.

Milked out twice a day every day, their son Josh, a history and government teacher at Tecumseh Local Schools, gets up at 4 a.m. and gets the milking process started on his grandfather’s farm. Jeff joins him to finish milking before Josh leaves to teach for the day. Kathy, the transportation director at Miami East Local Schools, helps after she finishes her bus routes in the morning and evenings.

When the milk price plummeted, the Knoops had to lay off family members including Jeff’s brother Alan’s wife Rhonda who would feed and milk as well as nephews who helped with the milking and chores on the farm. Kathy shared that the most difficult part for her was the decision to lay off family.

It’s the” ripple effect” in the local dairy closing that the community, and later consumers, may see, according to Shoemaker.

“For communities, it means a real change. Every time a farm closes its doors, we’re talking dairy farms, there’s a ripple effect, which might not immediately be felt by consumers, but within the community they’ll feel that impact. Every dairy farm works with local suppliers, local businesses that support the production of milk. It could be the veterinarian practice that lost a client, there’s a nutritionist who lost a client … There’s employees and family members that lose their jobs,” Shoemaker said. “There’s all these support industries. They are buying feed, they are selling calves, someone would buy those calves for beef. There’s a tremendous number of transactions that happen every month that are no longer going to help some local business. When enough leave the industry, some of those local businesses may shut their doors. From fuel suppliers, to the hoof trimmer, that’s one less client. That’s someone that goes farm-to-farm to do hoof trimming and feet care, they lose the ability to have a full-time job for their family.”

Josh said the exit out of the diary business will be tough due to work being a family affair, which his own son was starting to join.

Josh’s son young son Luke walked in the barn after half the herd was sold and was looking for his cow “Honest” in the stalls.

“That was hard tell him that ‘his cow’ Honest had to go to another farm,” Kathy said, noting they paired their grandson up with another to take the cow’s place.

Jeff can point out the lineage of each cow in the stall, even ones bred from his 4-H project in his youth. Josh can do the same. While the Knoops are still toying with keeping some part of the livestock at their farm, Jeff was quick to state no one with their last name will start up another dairy in his lifetime due to the start-up costs and the years of breeding it takes to optimize production.

Josh shared how he had once expressed interest in going into the diary farming business before he attended college, but his parents talked him out of it, thus leading him to chose a career in teaching.

The plight of the dairy industry made national news in 2018 when dairy co-ops starting inserting suicide prevention information along with their milk checks. Kathy shared her stunned reaction when she found one enclosed in their milk checks last spring.

“It was like a slap in the face,” she said.

CORPORATE PUSH FOR MEGA FARMS

Jeff said many dairy product corporations are switching to “one-stop and drop” operations where milk comes from one large operation instead of several smaller farms filling a milk truck together.

“For whatever reason, America says they don’t want factory farms. That’s simply what these guys are doing, they are creating the factory farms, even though the American people say they don’t want that, but that’s where it’s going,” Jeff said. “The smaller dairies like this and small family farms are gone. They are the first ones going out. These other guys are losing money just like I am, they are losing a whole lot more, but they have a whole lot more coming in, but they offset it and the bank will say it has to get better at some point.”

Jeff also attributes the surplus and its impact on his farm to social media, which he feels has attacked his livelihood with misinformation from groups such as PETA as well as the surge in soy and almond “juice” and alternative dairy products. Both Jeff and Kathy point out the American diet void of starting the day with a cold glass of milk, instead opting for soda or energy drinks.

“This is the only agriculture industry, the only one, that is inspected on the farm. You have to pass a state inspection. No hog producer has to pass an on-farm inspection. His is done after it’s killed. Sheep, chicken, eggs, beef, the same way. You can’t even grow lettuce today and not have it recalled. There’s never been a recall on milk. Ever. Never. It’s the safest food you can absolutely have,” Jeff said.

Jeff explained how his farm would be inspected three times a year. He expressed the importance in passing state inspection to keep the Grade A product from being downgraded to Grade B, which he said is worth “absolutely nothing.”

“Nothing that can leave this farm with antibiotics in it. It’s tested,” Jeff said, sharing how he’d fight misinformation being spread about their product on social media.

Kathy also noted most of the milk in the dairy aisles aren’t from local sources. She said she entered codes located on the containers and found milk in large grocery chains came from the East Coast. She found gallons of milk sold under the Friendly Farms label at Aldi come from Springfield.

“No one drinks milk like they used to,” she said. “It’s why kids break bones all the time. It’ll be too late to see what the long term effects may be on our health with people not drinking milk. When I was a kid, it was milk or water. A soda was a treat and we got one on Saturday night. It was like liquid gold. Now people get up in the morning and open up a Mountain Dew.”

While the exit out of the agriculture sector they love is still in the process, the Knoops found a silver lining in the fact their farm isn’t in debt like many they know in the business.

While each cow is known by name and its breeding lineage and not by ear tag number, the Knoops consider themselves lucky knowing they aren’t passing down farm loans or in danger of losing everything to creditors.

Kathy shared how they are making plans for retirement in the coming years and ways they’ll be enjoying their family outside of the farm. She also shared how her husband Jeff is looking forward to hiking trips with their son Kyle, a Troy Police officer, and they both will still tend to other farm projects outside of the dairy parlor.

“We’re going to be OK. It’s going to take some time getting used to it, but we’ll be OK,” she said.

 

Source: tdn-net.com

Dairy Prices May Be Ready to Rise in 2019

Milk prices haven’t exactly jumped higher early on in 2019. A Drovers’ report says dairy farmers are in need of a market rally after years of low prices. However, at least some relief may be coming this year.

Bryan Doherty, VP of Stewart-Peterson, tells Drovers that dairy is a tough market to be in right now because there’s too much product out there yet. The rate of efficiency per cow is still improving, which makes the market difficult to get going in the right direction because there’s just too much milk. Doherty says prices are low enough where demand is starting to grow again. Global dairy prices have begun to rise once again. Doherty also predicts more culling in the U.S. dairy herd while demand for dairy products should continue to increase. Recent cow numbers in the national dairy herd have been dropping. He points to that as a sign of a possible rally in milk prices in the coming months.

Trade will also play a role in which direction the price of milk goes. Ongoing negotiations with China could possibly bring a boost to the demand side of the milk pricing equation.

 

Source: Southeast Ag Net

Milk production running ahead of forecast on high demand from China: Fonterra

New Zealand’s Fonterra said on Thursday the multinational dairy co-operative’s production forecast for this season stands at 1.55 billion kg of milk solids, up 3 percent from the previous season.

As one of New Zealand’s largest company, Fonterra is responsible for about 30 percent of the world’s dairy exports.

“We are seeing really good demand out of China, which is going to support it,” the company’s Interim Chief Executive Miles Hurrell told local media, adding favorable growing conditions had boosted production but that the 3-percent forecast still stood.

“Europe was holding down a bit of skim milk powder stock, and most of that is exhausted now, so you are starting to see that play out through the shortage of supply,” Hurrell said, adding hot weather in Europe was helping to drive up skim milk powder prices.

Rural lending specialist Rabobank said continued good weather across much of New Zealand has seen feed reserves aplenty and milk production volumes still strong.

“While November 2018 milk collections saw modest year-on-year growth of one percent, we anticipate stronger December 2018 growth given that the tail end of 2017 was hot and milk supply dipped,” it said.

 

Source: Xinhua Net

PA Dairy Princesses raise $10,000 for ‘Fill a Glass with Hope’

Great news for area food banks was announced at the Pennsylvania Farm Show this week. Rising to the challenge of helping families in need, Pennsylvania Dairy Princesses from across the state have raised more than $10,250 for Fill a Glass with Hope in a year-long campaign to get milk to families using food banks and community feeding programs.

With a celebratory milk toast and official bell ringing, members kicked off the 2019 Fill a Glass with Hope campaign — a charitable fresh milk distribution program at the Pennsylvania Farm Show Complex and Expo Center.

Launched in 2015 in Central Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh, Fill a Glass with Hope expanded in 2016 to become the first statewide charitable fresh milk distribution program in the country. Since its inception, Fill a Glass with Hope has provided more than 10 million servings of milk to families in need through Feeding Pennsylvania’s eight member food banks statewide. The fundraising for the 2019 campaign launched today with major donations of $136,300.

Jane Clements-Smith, Executive Director of Feeding Pennsylvania said, “Milk is one of the most requested items in our charitable food network and Feeding Pennsylvania’s member food banks are extremely appreciative of our dairy farmers and  business leaders for investing in this amazing program so that we can purchase milk, at a reduced price, directly from local dairy processors and distribute it to Pennsylvania families in need.”

Dairy farmer Jeff Raney, and Chairman of the Pennsylvania Dairy Promotion Program, encouraged attendees to this year’s Farm Show to join this year’s efforts. “Pennsylvania dairy farmers are proud of the Fill A Glass with Hope campaign, an initiative that showcases our dedication for producing wholesome, nutritious milk, and also for ensuring it is accessible to families in our communities throughout the state,” said Raney.

After the milkshake toast, and official bell ringing to officially open the PA Farm Show Food Court, celebrities, including those from the media, joined efforts to tackle hunger as Celebrity Milkshake Servers at the PA Dairymen’s Association Milkshake Booth, to raise awareness and resources for the award-winning program. To learn more or to donate, visit their website.

Fresh milk is the most requested item at food banks, but the least donated. Pennsylvania Dairy Princess and Promotion Services, Inc., is dedicated to inspiring passion about Pennsylvania’s official beverage — MILK.

 

Source: Ag Daily

2019 is likely to be a watershed year for New Zealand dairy farmers

2019 is likely to be a watershed year for New Zealand dairy farmers.

Ahead there is the DIRA review with submissions closing on Friday the 8th and the final recommendations being given to Government supposedly not long after likely means most of the decisions have already been made.

The potential for radical change is there however, it is unlikely there will be much change although the issue around open entry (and departure) which is one of Fonterra’s weaknesses which competitors are able to exploit is likely to be looked at closely.

With the Fonterra issues from last year still to be resolved and asset sales being one of them it appears the return to basics call has resulted in the Fonterra Farm Source division being sold off to Carrfields Livestock, a company that seems to be on the move. Other sales are still to take place both domestically, i.e. Tip Top and a number of international sell offs including the ill-fated Beingmate investment most likely to go.

Government regulations around greenhouse gas emissions and the ongoing pressure with farming around impacts upon water quality mean that environmental issues may will be the greatest area of change and most likely cost. 2019 may only be the precursor for more to follow on this front. Whether farmers are able to adapt fast enough to satisfactorily meet these challenges is one thing and whether there is enough cash in the kitty to fund them is another with dairy debt continuing to rise, much of it to fund infrastructure to help mitigate their environmental footprints.

At least the GDT has continued to move in the right direction with the latest auction being the fourth on the trot to lift. For the key Whole Milk Powder sector this now is nearly an +11% rise from the recent trough in November with the latest price now putting WMP at $2,777 per tonne. A way to go to catch the $3,000 at this time last year and the $3,300 in April. However, the price for WMP for the last two years has been relatively stable trading mostly between $2,500 and $3,500 when prior to that in the 2014-2015 years it was wildly volatile ranging from a high of $5,500 before plummeting to $1,500. The average may be similar, but I suspect farmers would rather live with the more recent trend.

Recently the dollar has chipped off -½c which will also help the returns. As usual though we may not see any translation of GDT prices into farm gate predictions as there is a lot of water to flow, but still the results give room for some optimism.

In the meantime, milk flows are up for most regions on the back of regular rainfalls, the far north and north west of the South Island being the exception both suffering from a lack of moisture. The long promised El Nino is still to make its impact on eastern regions although there is still time for this to occur. NIWA have brought a new term into the vernacular now calling the latest El NIWA event a “Modoki” – a Japanese term meaning the same but different, hence why the weather patterns aren’t bringing the usual extremes of an El Nino.

Overall milk production is +3% ahead of last year, which was still suffering from poor spring conditions.

Further clouds for 2019 include the Trump effect and the ongoing saga of Brexit and 2019 is likely to be of interest to farmers and observers alike. The influence of the ongoing issues between the US and China is being reflected in lower than average consumer confidence in China with the fourth consecutive quarter being weaker than the previous year while in the US has the government shut down has 800,000 federal employees missing pay-checks and no sign of a compromise solution between Trump and seemingly everyone else.

So, with the old Chinese curse “may you live in interesting times” ringing in my ears, put your seat belts on we could be in for a roller coaster of a year.

Source: interest.co.nz

 

Australian dairy farmers hope milk code will address ‘David and Goliath’ fights

Dairy farmer Graham Forbes says he’s never really heard of a farmer keen to escalate a dispute with a milk processor, but he hopes a new code will remove the need to take on big businesses in court.

“Let’s hope so — if this works properly, farmers shouldn’t have to need to,” he says.

The department of agriculture and water resources released a draft of its mandatory dairy code of conduct on Tuesday morning. The 98 clauses cover hot-button issues like the use of exclusive milk supply clauses and whether processors can reduce the price paid for milk mid way through a contract.

Forbes, whose family dairy farm at Gloucester has been running for several generations, has negotiated with a number of milk processing businesses. He hopes the blueprint will allow the milk industry to “settle down”.

“Basically, we were always virtually in a ‘David and Goliath’ position every time you went in. Farmers had no ability to adjust the provisions within those contracts,” Forbes says.

The draft code will now be circulated for consultation at a range of public meetings in the coming months before potentially proceeding to legislation.

It has been in development since the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission recommended a compulsory code in April 2018 as part of its final report on its dairy inquiry.

In the report, the ACCC found contracts between farmers and processors “weighted heavily in favour of processors and which make it difficult for farmers to make efficient investment decisions”.

Agriculture Minister David Littleproud said the policy would help “balance the market power between dairy farmers and processors and improve farmers’ bargaining power”.

A key part of the draft code is the banning of retrospective step downs, which would stop milk processors from revising the agreed upon price of milk downwards mid-way through a contract.

It would also rule out compulsory exclusive supply deals, stopping a processor from insisting that a farmer only supply milk to them.

Under the compulsory code, unilateral changes to contracts would also be limited.

Companies that process milk would be made to publish a standard form contract on their websites outlining milk purchase terms and update this each year.

The code would apply to contracts between small farming businesses and processors and does not involve retailers or the major supermarkets.

However, a Woolworths spokesperson said it was good to see the government work through the “sensible, evidence-based” recommendations made by the consumer watchdog on dairy.

The draft is a good start, says chief executive of Dairy Connect, Shaughn Morgan, but a broader cultural shift is needed to ensure farmers have certainty when supplying their products.

“It’s a mandatory code that will bring that culture change – we would say that’s the way for it to start,” Morgan says.

But while the draft code says pecuniary penalties would be available if a breach of the code was found, there’s still uncertainty on what that looks like in practice.

The framework also wouldn’t set a guide on minimum milk prices, even though this is where many are getting squeezed, says Taree dairy farmer Tim Bale.

“This is a start, but it’s about the base price of milk in the first place. Processors have got to realise they have some responsibility there.”

Morgan also hopes the suggested dispute resolution paths, including mediation and arbitration, are followed in good faith by everyone in the sector once they become compulsory.

In a statement, milk processor Fonterra said it had worked with government previously on the voluntary dairy code and looked forward to consulting on the new draft.

“We note the release of the draft mandatory code for public comment, and look forward to continuing our participation in the consultation process, working with industry and government to ensure Australian dairy remains internationally competitive, and continues to encourage investment and innovation,” a spokesperson said.

Processors Lion Dairy and Saputo Dairy Australia have been contacted for comment.

 

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

 

Shutdown delays payments, creates challenges for US dairy farmers

The federal government shutdown stopped two checks to Hildebrand Farms Dairy, forcing the owners to delay payments on some of their bills, a situation that probably won’t be sustainable.

Kathy Hildebrand, co-owner of the Junction City dairy farm, said the farm received neither of the payments made through the Market Facilitation Program. That federal program provides support to farmers to make up for dollars lost because of trade wars.

Hildebrand’s voice was cheerful despite the pressures on the business, and she said they had made plans to handle things without the checks.

“We just keep plugging along,” she said. “It will be nice when we get it, so we can pay some extra money on the other bills that we have.”

She said they have reached out to their lenders and assured them that “we’ll get you paid.”

“We’re doing OK,” she said. “It hasn’t, as of yet, directly affected us.”

But it all depends on how long Hildebrand farm vendors are willing to be patient. Those vendors need their money to pay their creditors too, she said.

Jackie Klippenstine, a senior vice president for Dairy Farmers of America, said many dairy farmers have been challenged because the second round of their payments through the MFP were held up.

Late last year, the federal government announced there would be support payments to help farmers make up for the losses they were experiencing as a result of the trade war. Dairy farmers were slated to receive $0.12 cwt, a hundredweight measurement used in commodities trading, based on their 2018 production. While many farmers received the first half of the payments, the shutdown held up the second half of payments — although with the U.S. Department of Agriculture closed, it is difficult to determine how many checks didn’t go out.

“I can’t speak to the other segments that are impacted, but the dairy industry has been going through several very challenging years,” Klippenstein said. “That would have been much appreciated relief to the farmers that were the most affected. Those funds will not be dispersed until the government reopens. That’s one of the most immediate challenges that I can see.”

Klippenstein said the USDA indicated about $40 million was left on the table from the first round of dairy payments.

“We know there are some farmers out there that likely don’t think they’re eligible,” she said. “There’s probably a small group of farmers who are not interested in getting it at all. Nobody wants the idea of getting these types of payments, but I think it was timed well to help producers with some of the bills they had to pay end of year.”

In addition to delayed tariff-support payments, the U.S. Department of agriculture is “basically shut down,” which creates challenges for processing loans, grants and other information, she said.

In talking with officials from other states about the shutdown challenges, Klippenstein said she believes many may be unaware how the entire chain is impacted when it comes to food production.

“We don’t realize how much government interaction that the industry has on a regular basis,” she said. “We apparently secure permits for some of our trucking fleets, and the IRS and the department of transportation are both involved in securing those permits. If those entities aren’t open, we have difficulty securing the permits. We have difficulty moving milk.”

Not as imperative as missed MFP payments is the fact that the dairy industry received support in the recently passed farm bill, particularly in how the margin protection program was changed to be more flexible, affordable and accessible, Klippenstein said.

“Now rolling out the new program will be delayed with USDA being shut down like most of the government,” she said.

One benefit of the shutdown, though, is that Dairy Farmers of America has been able to speak to lawmakers on the local level, Klippenstein said.

“While several have been in Washington doing some work, especially the House because they had some votes over the last two weeks or so, we have seen legislators home more,” she said. “Farmers are able to directly speak with them. Most legislators are seeking meetings with stakeholders to better understand how this shutdown is impacting them. I think that’s a very positive sign. Our farmers are very politically active and always willing to share how the industry is being impacted by good ideas or bad ideas that they see the government putting forth.”

Hildebrand holds out hope that those in Washington, D.C., will find a solution to reopen the government.

“It’s frustrating that they can’t get along and figure things out,” she said.

 
Source: Cjonline.com

Indiana Dairy Farms Decreased By 10 Percent In 2018, But That Could Be A Good Thing

Ten percent of Indiana’s dairy farms closed last year. It is a trend that has been happening across the country, but the situation may slowly be improving.

Indiana has lost two out of every three dairy farms in the past twenty years, but experts say 2018 was worse.  Last year, Indiana lost twice as many dairy farms than it has in years past.

Doug Leman is the Executive Director of the Indiana Dairy Producers. 

“There is a normal attrition every year in dairy farms, and these are Grade A dairy farms we’re talking about,” Leman says. “Last year, was more like double the normal rate.”

Leman says declining consumption leads to lower demand, but production continues to increase. That makes it difficult for farmers who have to absorb lower prices.

Despite grim numbers from 2018, Leman believes the situation is beginning to improve because production is moving closer to demand.

 

Source: Indiana Public Media

Jersey cows and milk being promoted by Jersey Australia in new campaign

A new promotion called Dairy’s Finest highlights the strength of the Jersey cow and milk.

Jersey Australia general manager Glen Barrett said the promotion wasn’t just about the cow but also a focus on the qualities of Jersey milk.

Along with a new corporate logo, Jersey Australia has developed sub-brands as part of the campaign.

In the genetics field, the `5 Star’ Jersey is being highlighted as the finest cow. A `5 star’ Jersey is one that is registered, A.I-bred, herd tested, classified and genomic-tested, Mr Barrett said.

“It can also be promoted for five features of what is best known and loved about the Jersey cow as the highly fertile, feed efficient, heat tolerant, medium-sized and most profitable cow for Australia farming conditions,” he said.

Mr Barrett said it was a bold marketing strategy but one based on facts and Australian experiences.

“We see Jersey milk as dairy’s finest milk and the Jersey cow as dairy’s finest cow and we believe that this premium quality should be well known across Australia,” he said.

There are now about 10 processors in Australia providing jersey-branded product, sold for a premium price and delivering premium returns to farmers.

“There are opportunities to support the growth of Jersey milk in the market place and we want to grow the breed and increase demand for the product,” Mr Barrett said.

Jerseys currently represent about 15 per cent of the Australian dairy industry but Jersey Australia wants to achieve 25pc market share by 2030.

“It is an ambitious target but we’re working towards growing the number of cows and product lines because we see Jerseys as the ideal cow for the Australian dairy industry,” Mr Barrett said.

“We also get a lot of feedback from coffee shops that pure Jersey milk makes the best coffee.”

The new logos and brands will be officially unveiled at International Dairy Week where people will also be able to enjoy coffees made with Jersey milk for a gold coin donation to an IDW charity.

IDW 2019 will run from Sunday January 20 to Thursday January 24.

Source: adf.farmonline.com.au

New Jersey’s Dairy Farms Are in Crisis

Lambertville—a family-run business, like most Jersey dairy farms—has been milking cows for 109 years. Turning a profit from pails of milk keeps getting harder. Photo credit: Matt Rainey

Since he started milking his neighbors’ cows at age 10, Jared Weeks knew he wanted to be a dairy farmer. At 12, he scraped together $2,100 to buy his first cow, a Brown Swiss. At 19, he rented land in Hunterdon County, near where he grew up, and bought 15 cows.

Today, Weeks has a herd of about 200 cows on 250 acres in Ringoes. He owns 82 of the acres and rents the rest from his wife’s family and from other owners who benefit from a farm-assessment tax cut on the land he works. At 32, Weeks is starting to question his career choice.

“The scariest part for me is seeing these guys who have been in the business for generations selling out,” he says. “These are good farmers, better than what I am. It makes me wonder, If they can’t hack it, how am I going to?”

New Jersey, by most accounts, had more than 500 dairy farms in the 1950s and ’60s. Those days seem halcyon now. In the last 20 years, the dairy industry has been in free fall. In 2000, just 225 dairy farms were left. By 2009, the number had dropped to 103. By last fall, it had plunged to 48. In 2017, sales of milk and of milk cows were a mere $27 million, trailing blueberries ($84 million), peaches ($44 million) and tomatoes ($39 million).

Last summer, amid what he saw as a crisis, Weeks asked the New Jersey Department of Agriculture what, if anything, was being done to help the state’s remaining dairy farmers to hang on. In response, the department organized a statewide dairy summit, held in October. Afterward, Tom Beaver, marketing director for the department, sounded upbeat.

“We wanted to get everyone in the same room and, hopefully, put good opportunities together,” he said. “Everybody’s trying to figure out how we can find solutions for our 48 producers.”

Sadly, five weeks after the summit, a dairy farmer whose family had been milking cows in Sussex County for generations transported his herd of milkers to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, to auction them off, thereby reducing the number of dairy farms in New Jersey to 47.

“We’re dying a slow death,” says Weeks. “And yet you feel so helpless because it’s not something you have any control over.”

That holds true, at least in one respect, across the country. Milk is sold as a commodity. In almost all cases, farmers sell their milk not to consumers, but to processing plants or co-ops that pasteurize, homogenize, bottle and distribute the milk. The price the processors pay the farmers is set by the United States Department of Agriculture through its Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO).

The FMMO was established in the 1930s to support farmers facing low milk prices and to assure consumers an adequate supply of milk. Prior to the FMMO, processors controlled the prices.

The FMMO is calculated based on several factors, notably regional, national and international supply and demand.

Photo credit: Matt Rainey

In 2014, processors paid American farmers an average of $24 per 100 pounds of milk (approximately 12 gallons). By early 2015, the FMMO price had dropped almost 40 percent, to between $14 and $16 per 100 pounds.

According to dairy-industry surveys, the nationally averaged current cost of producing 100 pounds of milk is $18-to-$20, meaning dairy farmers lose money on every gallon they produce. Yet the FMMO overall has not budged, and retaliatory tariffs by China threaten to reduce demand for dairy exports.

Meanwhile, consumers have increasingly turned to nondairy alternatives. Since 2012, according to a 2018 national survey by market research firm Mintel, sales of plant-based alternatives like almond, soy and coconut milk have grown 61 percent, while dairy milk sales have shrunk 15 percent. Nondairy milks now constitute a $2.11 billion industry competing for space in supermarket dairy sections.

Although total U.S. milk sales are down, the 2018 survey noted an uptick in sales of whole milk and a big drop in sales of skim milk. The renewed popularity of whole milk—38 percent of the national $16.1 billion dairy market, compared to 29 percent five years ago—might be attributable to studies showing whole milk’s health benefits, including possible links to reducing diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Still, in New Jersey, where virtually all dairy farms are small and most are family run, turning a profit is increasingly difficult, and not just because of the static FMMO.“New Jersey is a very challenging state for farming,” says the NJDA’s Beaver. “Even with the farmland tax program, our farmers are paying some of the highest property taxes on agricultural land in the country.”

The Farmland Assessment Act, passed in 1964, was intended to stem the tide of farmers selling their arable land to developers. The law established a reduced tax rate for acres being actively farmed. The reduction, however, applies only to those acres, not to farmhouses or any other buildings on the property.

Worse than selling milk at less than it costs to produce is not being able to sell it at all. Across the country, reports have spread of farmers being turned away by milk processors due to lack of demand. Last year, a New York dairy farmer took his own life. It was the third suicide in the last few years among farmers who sell to Agri-Mark, a large dairy co-op based in Massachusetts. Afterwards, Agri-Mark began sending notices to its members on dealing with depression and seeking suicide-prevention counseling.

Though there have been no reports of farm-related suicides in New Jersey, farmers here have received similar notices from the co-ops that process their milk, according to Weeks.

“I’ve seen them,” he says. “Letters that say, ‘We know times are tough. If you’re thinking about killing yourself, here’s a number to call.’ It’s an unfortunate part of the business, but people get pretty desperate.”

New Jersey, for its part, has been urging dairy farmers to explore what Beaver calls “value-added revenue streams.” These include agritourism programs and the production of milk byproducts.

Robert Fulper and daughter Mikayla, fourth and fifth generation farmers, have added farm tours, which often end with visitors buying cheese and yogurt. Photo credit: Matt Rainey

Mikayla Fulper, the 23-year-old herd manager of Fulper Farms, attended the dairy summit with her father, Robert Fulper II, who runs the 1,100-acre farm in Lambertville with his brother Fred. Mikayla, who is among the fifth generation of Fulpers to milk cows in Hunterdon County, has helped steer the 109-year-old farm into the new revenue streams the state has been championing.

A few weeks after the summit, on a grey, blustery Saturday, when most of New Jersey was being threatened by a Nor’easter, Mikayla was leading two families on a tour of the farm.

“We dehorn the females at birth because they can hurt each other or get themselves stuck in a bad situation,” she said, explaining why a calf born hours earlier was wearing a cap of silver duct tape on her head. “We put a salve on to prevent horn growth, and the tape is there to make sure it doesn’t spread to the other calves.”

The tour ended in the 60-year-old milking parlor, where Mikayla deftly attached suction cups to each cow’s four udders, starting the automated milking process that takes five to seven minutes per cow.

In addition to being in charge of more than 200 animals on the farm, Mikayla handles most of the tourist activities, including a farm adventure camp each summer, and helps sell the cheese and yogurt the family produces, multiplying the value of its milk.

But as engaged as she is with her visitors, the recent Penn State grad is clearly most in her element with the 105 cows that line up twice a day to be milked. As she speaks, she pats black-and-white Sassy on the head and lets Sassy’s long tongue lick her jacket.

“I’m passionate about tourism, but slightly more passionate about the cows,” says Mikayla, who expects to one day take over the farm with her brother, RJ, who oversees the crops.

Almost all milk produced in Jersey is sold to one of three in-state processing plants. Each processor comingles it with milk from neighboring states. Beaver says this is necessary because New Jersey produces much less milk than Pennsylvania and New York. So while Jersey dairy farmers would love to wrap themselves in the state’s Jersey Fresh branding campaign that promotes Jersey fruits, vegetables and other farm products, the comingling of milk rules that out.

It’s especially frustrating because Jersey Fresh could give dairy farmers a lift. Just before the summit, NJDA assessed consumer attitudes about Jersey Fresh milk. Beaver says 85 percent of those surveyed said they would be interested in buying such a product.

Joe Calilillo, who owns five ShopRite supermarkets in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, says the Jersey Fresh label has been extremely helpful in selling local produce at his stores.

“If we could produce milk from a local farm, I think there would be a market for it,” Calilillo says. “People want to support the local farmers. They see them as neighbors, and it’s something tangible.”

One of the more pressing topics at the summit was the stranglehold the processors have on Jersey milk. Farmers are not required by law to sell their milk to processors, but as a practical matter, most can’t afford to do their own processing and bottling, let alone distribution.

So far, only one New Jersey farm, Springhouse Creamery in Fredon, is doing that, albeit on a small scale. Springhouse is owned by Peter Southway, a former commercial banker who retired from the corporate world 15 years ago to start a dairy farm with his wife and six children. Every day at 4:30 am and again at 4:30 pm, Southway and his family can be found in their 1930s barn milking their 52 Holstein and Jersey cows, which produce about 275 gallons of milk a day.

Last February, seeking more control over his end product, Southway purchased bottling equipment and a pasteurizing machine to kill pathogenic bacteria. He pasteurizes to levels just above the minimum required by the state. (Unlike Pennsylvania and 11 other states in the country, New Jersey does not allow the sale of raw, or unpasteurized, milk.)

The milk is sold in glass bottles at a roadside stand next to the barn. The stand operates on an honor system. The family also delivers bottles to about 15 stores in the area.

The milk sports a thick layer of cream on top because it is not homogenized. If you want whole milk, just shake it up. Southway says skipping the vigorous mechanical homogenizing process, which vastly reduces the size of the fat globules, makes the milk easier to digest. Scientifically, it’s an unproven claim, but Southway’s aims are nonetheless admirable.

“We’re trying to deliver a product right from the cow, and that is very fragile,” explains Southway, 58. “We don’t pump it a lot, and we heat it to the minimum temperatures for the least amount of time allowable. We don’t add anything to it or take anything away.”

The milk—chocolate or regular—sells for $7 a gallon, with all proceeds going to the farm. By comparison, Southway would receive just over $1 a gallon for milk sold to a processor. “We set our price, we don’t get a price set for us,” he says, noting that consumers today are willing to pay more for a fresh, natural product.
Southway says he invested $150,000 to launch his pasteurizing and bottling operation, saving some money because he already had a building and some equipment in place for the farm’s cheese making.

For Weeks to build a bottling site at his Ringoes farm would, he estimates, cost him twice that amount, and possibly as much as $400,000. That is money he does not have.

Weeks grows all his own feed for his cows and earns extra money by selling leftover crops. But he loses money on every gallon of milk he produces. Lately, the milk checks—issued by the processing plant have hovered around $14 for every 100 pounds of milk, though it costs him $18.50 to produce that amount.

“Each month when we get our milk check,” says his wife, Treacy, 31, “we don’t know what we’re going to get, but it’s always an unpleasant surprise.” She helps make ends meet by boarding horses and running a corn maze for tourists.

Weeks has been going to great lengths, literally, to create at least some products bearing his Hun-Val Farm label. He’s teamed with Jon McConaughy of Brick Farm Market in Hopewell to supply the market with non-homogenized milk he bottles in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Weeks pays someone to make the 200-mile round trip to deliver and pick up his milk twice a week.

He sells some of the milk to McConaughy to make the ice cream sold at McConaughy’s Red Barn Milk Company in Ringoes. Yet that, plus milk he sells to a few local organic markets, accounts for just 10 percent of the milk Weeks produces. The rest goes to Readington Farms, a milk processor in Whitehouse Station.

For now, NJDA is not looking to upset the milk status quo. “Our market is relatively stable,” says Beaver, referring to overall supply and demand. “We have the benefit of reliability from our processors”—compared, he explains, to states where milk processors have terminated their contracts with longtime dairy providers.

Nor does the state plan to help fund on-farm bottling operations. Describing the state’s role as that of matchmaker, Beaver says such funding would have to come from federal grants or loans or private-equity investments.

For their part, the dairy farmers have no illusions.

“It’s nice to know we’re still being heard and cared about, but the state can only do so much,” says Fulper. “I don’t think there are going to be many solutions.”

As he watches farms around him close, Weeks worries that the state is losing not only the collective knowledge of seasoned farmers, but also the infrastructure that once supported dairy farming. With his own debt exceeding the value of all his cows and equipment, Weeks couldn’t call it quits now even if he wanted to.

“Supplies and repair [services] are non-existent in New Jersey,” he says. “If the machine I use to milk the cows breaks down, I have to call somebody from Lancaster, and it’s $400–$500 by the time they pull into my driveway, because the meter starts ticking as soon as they head out.”

Walking through his barn, describing the personalities and milking characteristics of Paris, his 17-year-old Brown Swiss, and her companions, Milkweed, Queenie, Darla and Pearl, Weeks turns wistful.

“Everything starts to dry up around you, and you don’t have any means to change it,” he says. “Unfortunately, we have a bad habit of trying to solve things after they’re already gone.”

Source: njmonthly.com

Drinking More Milk Won’t Save Dairy Farmers

The mainstream media has discovered the crisis in the dairy industry. While it has been taking place for a long time, the fact that large numbers of dairy farmers are going out of business has just captured their attention. Several local TV and newspaper stories surfaced last week lamenting the fact that in approximately 10% of Indiana dairy farmers went out of business in 2018. The stories behind these failures are heartbreaking, which is one of the reasons the media has picked up on the story.

“Just walking around here, it’s like the rapture happened and we didn’t go,” Johnson County farmer Joe Kelsay told an Indianapolis television station. Last fall he had to sell all his 500 dairy cows, ending 6 generations in the dairy business. Kevin Benter, of Jackson County, is another former dairy producer who was forced out of business. “I get asked every day if I miss dairy farming,” Benter told a Columbus newspaper. “It’s unbelievable how much I miss it.” All farm failures are unfortunate and emotional, but dairy farmers even more so since dairy producers have a real emotional connection with their cows. Selling a dairy herd is a lot like breaking up a family.

The reasons for the downturn in dairy are many, complex, and varied. Industry experts blame a drop in milk consumption caused by increased competition from other beverages, especially those calling themselves milk.  Dairy farmers blame large, mega-dairy operations that milk thousands of cows each day.  While there is truth in both these statements, there are  many other reasons, some caused by dairy producers themselves.

No other sector of agriculture has made more advancements in efficiency than the dairy industry. Every year for the past several decades, milk production per cow has increased. Thus, even with a continued decline in milk cow numbers and a decline in dairy farmers, total U.S. milk output continues to grow. This keeps the wholesale price of milk low and gives large dairy operations a competitive advantage over small producers. The lack of an effective government safety net program for dairy is the result of a divided dairy industry that cannot speak with one voice on policy issues.

Consumers are also to blame, not just for drinking more almond milk, flavored water, or Diet Coke, but for refusing to put a higher value on milk. Whenever the retail price of milk creeps up, consumers are the first to scream. They expect the dairy case to always be full and to always be cheap. At my local Target store, the everyday price for a gallon of milk is 99 cents. Considering what it takes to produce a gallon of milk and deliver it fresh to a retail dairy case, that is a ridiculously low price. Target may be taking a loss in order to get people into their stores to buy their other overpriced food items, but it still reinforces in the mind of the consumer that milk is a low-cost commodity.

Almost every state is seeing dairy farms disappear, and this trend is not likely to change. The price outlook for milk in 2019 is not good. Milk production continues to rise while demand continues to fall. Some say just getting people to drink more milk will solve the problem. Some well-meaning groups have even launched what they called the 10 Gallon Challenge. This was for each of us to buy 10 gallons of milk to donate to food banks. In addition, the USDA has reversed an Obama era rule that banned some milk from school lunches. While measures like this will help some, it is a drop in the milk bucket.

U.S. Milk production in the 23 major states during November of 2018 totaled 16.4 billion pounds, up 0.8% from November 2017. To drink our way out of the dairy crisis would mean a lot more milk would have to be consumed to have an impact. While some dairy operations will find a specialty market they can produce for, the sad reality is more and more dairy producers will shut down in the coming year.

What is happening in the dairy sector is happening in most other sectors of agriculture. The farm economy is moving into two different sectors: the commodity sector and the high value specialty sector. While the transition will be painful, in the end, both will present opportunities for different scale operations to be successful.

 

Source: Hoosier Ag Today

Holstein UK Announces Winner of President’s Medal Award

The prestigious 2018 President’s Medal Award was awarded last night by Holstein UK. Jess Mills from the Derbyshire Holstein Young Breeders Club claimed the title, and has won an engraved medal and a trip to the Royal Winter Fair in Toronto, kindly funded by HYB’s principal sponsor, Semex, later this year. Holstein UK also congratulate the two runners up James Doherty from the Shropshire Club and Jess Hurren from the North East Club.

Sponsored by Semex, the Holstein UK President’s Medal is regarded as an ‘Oscar’ of the dairy world; it recognises and rewards young talent and highlights individuals who are the dairy farmers of the future. The Award, presented at the Semex Conference last night in Glasgow, recognises a HYB member who has made an outstanding contribution to the breed, Holstein Young Breeders, and, in particular, their own Club. 

The entry process started with each HYB Club being asked to nominate one young breeder aged between 23 and 26 years of age. Six young breeders were shortlisted for interview with the panel of judges, including Peter Waring (Holstein UK President), Darren Todd (Holstein UK Geneticist) and Rodger Mather (Semex Representative), following submission of an essay titled “Nine years after the first genomic bulls were used female genomic testing is on the rise. Discuss the role of this technology within modern dairy farming and how you could use this data within your own herd management”.  Following the interviews, the final three were selected and, last night, the winner was officially announced.

Holstein UK President, Peter Waring, was one of the judges and commented on the winner, “All three candidates were very impressive and came across as particularly hard-working, dedicated young people. We were very impressed by their passion and enthusiasm for the industry as a whole, but in particular pedigree breeding. They displayed some very innovative thinking in their quest to improve their herds.  HYB has obviously been a great experience for them, both socially and in terms of developing their knowledge of dairying.  With the future of our industry in the hands of such capable young people, we should be confident that British dairying will progress and thrive in the years to come.”

Hannah Williams, Head of Events & Marketing for Holstein UK, added, “It is wonderful to see such inspirational young people coming through Holstein Young Breeders and we would like to congratulate them all. On behalf of Holstein UK and HYB I would also like to thank our principal sponsor Semex UK who continue to make a significant financial contribution to the advancement and success of Holstein Young Breeders.”

 

Source: Holstein UK

Send this to a friend