Archive for farm mental health

The Phone Call Most Dairy Farmers Won’t Make- And the Three Marriages It Saved

Inside the Minnesota families who asked for help before it was too late—and why their choice could change how you think about survival.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Katie Elvehjem was ready to drive 95 miles per hour down a back road—anything to escape the pressure of cows calving, kids hungry, and a husband who couldn’t see she was drowning. Instead, she sent one email to a therapist. It saved her marriage. This article follows three Minnesota dairy families who made the call most farmers refuse to make: asking for help before the economics destroyed everything else. With Class III crashing toward $15 and margins at their lowest since 2012, the pressure is crushing—but nobody tracks how many farms fail because the marriage failed first. Free counseling exists. These families used it. And they discovered something the industry needs to hear: asking for help isn’t a sign of weakness. It’s the survival strategy that actually works.

Katie Elvehjem put fresh hay out for the cows on the family farm Monday December 8, in Glenwood, MN. Divorce rate has ticked up for farmers recently, as well as calls for marriage counseling. Therapists and farmers blame this rise in marriage stress on changing economics within farming, that have forced farmers to take up jobs off the farm. ] JERRY HOLT • jerry.holt@startribune.com

I’ll never forget the moment I first read Katie Elvehjem’s story in Jenny Berg’s December reporting for the Star Tribune. Something in those words stopped me cold—not because it was dramatic, but because it was so achingly familiar. So ordinary. The kind of breaking point that happens in kitchens and barns across dairy country every single day, invisible until someone finally finds the courage to speak.

It was a Friday evening in spring 2024. Katie’s cows were calving—you know what that means, someone checking every few hours around the clock. Her children were clamoring for dinner, that hungry-tired kind that doesn’t negotiate or wait. Her husband Matt Laubach was out in their Glenwood fields, racing daylight to get seed in the ground before the weather turned.

But the thing eating at her most? Matt couldn’t seem to see she was drowning.

“I felt like driving 95 miles per hour down a road somewhere just to get out some steam,” Katie told the Star Tribune.

What happened next still gives me chills. Because Katie didn’t bolt. She didn’t give up. Instead, she did something that would have been unthinkable to her grandparents’ generation of Minnesota farmers.

She sent an email to a therapist.

Within a week, Katie and Matt were in couples counseling. And what happened in those sessions didn’t just save their marriage—it transformed how they run their farm, raise their children, and talk to each other at 2 AM during calving season.

This is a story about what breaks. But more importantly, it’s about what heals when people find the courage to reach out.

The Numbers We Never Talk About

Here’s something that keeps me awake at night.

The dairy industry obsesses over metrics. Milk prices per hundredweight. Feed costs. Margins. Herd size. Butterfat percentages. We track every data point with religious devotion—it’s just what we do.

But there’s a number nobody tracks: how many farms we’re losing not to bad genetics or brutal markets, but to marriages that couldn’t survive the business.

“This could get uglier and uglier,” Katie remembered thinking that spring evening, according to the Star Tribune. “And the thing that brought us together, our farm, could drive us apart.”

The courage it took to admit that fear out loud. To name the thing so many of us carry silently.

Katie isn’t alone. But what the crisis headlines miss—what moved me most in researching these stories—is that families are fighting back. And against every odd, they’re winning.

The Woman Who Understands

Monica McConkey grew up on a farm in northwestern Minnesota. She’s spent over 25 years walking alongside families in crisis, and since 2019, she’s served as an agricultural mental health counselor through a program funded by the Minnesota Legislature and administered by Region Five Development Commission.

When Katie’s email arrived, Monica knew exactly what she was seeing. A family at the breaking point—but not yet broken.

“In tough economic years like we’re in right now, there might have to be changes to lifestyle and spending,” Monica explained to the Star Tribune. “That’s hard, and those are hard conversations to have in marriage.”

Her prescription was deceptively simple: schedule one hour every week to talk about money. Put it on the calendar. Make it happen. Run the marriage a little more like a million-dollar company might run its board.

Katie and Matt started holding weekly financial meetings at their kitchen table. And I won’t pretend those first conversations were easy—they were brutal. Raw disagreements about whether to till the fields. Whether to sell the cattle. Whether they could afford another year of hoping prices would turn.

But somewhere along the way, something shifted. The meetings stopped feeling like surgery and started feeling like planning.

“After almost two years with Monica,” Katie told the Star Tribune, “our fights sound more like banter now.”

Both she and Matt now call their marriage “solid”—a word neither would have used that spring evening in 2024.

What gives me hope? Their 10-year-old daughter, Finley, has started joining those weekly meetings. Not to burden her with adult problems, but to show her what her parents had to learn the hard way: farming isn’t really about driving tractors anymore. It’s about having the conversations nobody wants to have—and coming out stronger.

“We have too much invested in one another,” Katie said.

Even now, she frames love in economic terms. But watching her stand in that pasture with Matt, debating the cattle sale that used to spark real fights—what Berg captured in her reporting is something different in the air. Something that looks like a partnership rebuilt from the ground up.

The Math That Nearly Broke Them

Let me paint you a picture of what Katie and Matt were carrying.

They run more than 1,200 acres near Glenwood in Pope County. They’re bringing in about a million dollars annually, which sounds impressive until you realize, as the Star Tribune documented, they’re hoping to scrape off maybe $50,000 in profit.

Katie raises beef cattle. With beef-on-dairy calves now commanding prices north of $1,300—some auctions topping $1,375 per hundredweight according to industry reports—and fed cattle prices pushing toward $230 per hundredweight in late 2025, that side of the operation might be what’s keeping them afloat.

But the milk market told a different story through 2024 and into 2025. Class III hit $18.20 in September, then crashed toward the mid-$15 range for early 2026. The Dairy Margin Coverage program calculated margins below $7 per hundredweight through much of 2023—the lowest since 2012.

So when Katie and Matt stand in their pasture in November, staring at what the Star Tribune described as “a quarter million dollars” worth of cattle, and Matt says, “Why don’t we just sell?”—it’s not really about the cows.

It never was.

“Matt sees these animals and just sees dollar signs,” Katie told the Star Tribune, stroking a white cow’s fur with a slight smile that suggested they’d had this argument before. Many times.

But here’s what’s different now: they can have that argument without it threatening everything else.

“Each debt, each purchase, and each business decision is more stressful with kids waiting in the wings,” Matt reflected. “A bad decision could both destroy a business built over three generations and deprive their kids of a chance to farm in the future.”

The weight of that responsibility used to crush them separately. Now they carry it together.

A Princeton Family’s Quiet Revolution

Two hours east of Glenwood, another family was fighting their own battle—a story also documented in Berg’s Star Tribune feature.

Thomas and Kristin Reiman Duden had taken over Kristin’s family dairy in Princeton, Minnesota, in 2017. About 40 cows—a small operation by today’s standards. The choice that year was stark: invest millions in expansion, or find another way forward.

They chose diversification. Bought tractors. Added a baler. Within two years, according to the Star Tribune, they owed about half a million dollars.

Thomas couldn’t bear to milk the cows anymore. Each time he walked into the barn, all he could see was money draining away. Kristin noticed him becoming dismissive—”a little mean,” as she described it to the Star Tribune. His moods darkened in ways that scared her.

Kristin was already in therapy—healing from what she described to the Star Tribune as a previous abusive marriage. One day, she asked Thomas to sit in on a session. Just for support.

What the counselors observed changed everything. They gently suggested Thomas might be “steeped in depression” himself—words that caught him completely off guard.

The moment of recognition. That he simply hadn’t seen what was happening inside himself. How many farmers reading this right now are living something they’ve stopped being able to recognize? How many spouses are watching it happen, not knowing how to break through?

Thomas and Kristin started couples counseling. They attended a couples retreat. There must have been nights when giving up seemed easier than restructuring everything they knew.

But then something remarkable happened.

They made a decision that defied every expectation the industry puts on farm families. They reorganized their entire operation around their mental health—not their profit margins.

Kristin took on milking—trudging out to the barn every 12 hours, finding in that rhythm a kind of grounding instead of drowning. Thomas took a job off the farm, training other farmers to use self-propelled sprayers.

In an industry where “real farmers” don’t take off-farm jobs—where stepping back from milking can feel like admitting failure—what Thomas and Kristin did was quietly revolutionary. They decided their marriage mattered more than how it looked to the neighbors.

The farm didn’t fail. The marriage didn’t fail. They found a different way to make both work.

“Success on the farm is success in the relationship,” Thomas told the Star Tribune.

It’s the kind of wisdom that only comes from nearly losing both—and choosing, every single day, not to let go.

What Farm Family Therapy Actually Looks Like

When a farmer calls Monica McConkey at (218) 280-7785, something remarkable happens: they don’t have to explain themselves.

They don’t have to translate what it means when the banker calls about the operating note. They don’t have to describe “spring fieldwork” or “calving season” or why taking a vacation is logistically impossible when you’re milking twice a day.

Monica grew up on a farm. She already knows.

The service is free and is funded through an appropriation from the Minnesota Legislature to the Region Five Development Commission. No insurance hoops. Phone, Zoom, or in-person. For as long as you need.

But what actually happens in those sessions? It’s not lying on a couch talking about your childhood. It’s practical. Strategic. Sometimes it’s as simple as scheduling that weekly financial meeting. Sometimes it’s harder: restructuring who does what, acknowledging depression that’s been hiding in plain sight, learning to fight in ways that don’t leave scars.

The couples who make it through often discover something unexpected: they’re still arguing over the same decisions, but now they’re on the same team.

That distinction—same team versus opposing sides—might be the difference between farms that survive this crisis and farms that don’t.

The Invisible Weight Farm Women Carry

A University of Georgia Extension study on farm wives documented something researchers call “emotional labor”—the invisible work that falls overwhelmingly on women in farm families. Being the eternal cheerleader. Tolerating stress-related irritability. Serving as a mediator when father and son clash over decisions.

One wife in the study captured it perfectly: “So my son has that stress of not filling his daddy’s shoes… So I have to kind of—be the mediator.”

Another described what farm families sacrifice: “Time is huge. The things that they miss… Everything. They miss everything… Everything.”

That word, repeated three times. Everything. Anyone who’s farmed knows exactly what she means.

But the Georgia researchers also found what helps. Faith and prayer. Talking with other farmers who “get it”—often at the fuel pump or seed store. Making creative use of limited time: grabbing a meal away from the farm, turning a drive to the parts store into “couples time.”

Small moments that don’t look like anything from the outside—but feel like oxygen when you’re drowning.

Echoes of the 1980s

Minnesota has been here before.

Bob Worth farms soybeans and corn near Lake Benton. When Berg interviewed him for the Star Tribune, he talked about 1986—the year his local bank told him he couldn’t get any more money.

That harvest, he couldn’t get out of bed. Fighting with his wife. Sleeping on the couch.

“There were times we were shaky,” he admitted.

But Bob and his wife made it through. Nearly four decades later, watching young families navigate similar pressures, he carries a weight of understanding few others can share.

“I feel for the young families,” he told the Star Tribune.

Emily Hansen, a Commercial Agriculture Educator with University of Illinois Extension, drew the parallel carefully in recent comments to Brownfield Ag News: “Comparing these economic times… to what happened back in the 80s, we’re not quite at that point, but everybody’s stressed right now.”

Greg Ibendahl from Kansas State University was more direct: today’s debt load is “similar to the run up to the 1980s farm crisis.” Land prices remain high, he noted, “but it wouldn’t take much to duplicate a 1980s situation where land prices would drop. So far, we haven’t seen that.”

The Federal Reserve’s agricultural credit report confirms the pattern—credit conditions have softened for eight straight quarters.

Here’s what the history books miss about the 1980s: the economy turned around in 1986, but rural communities took much longer to heal. The wounds don’t heal on the market’s timeline. They heal on the family’s timeline. Or they don’t heal at all.

The Relief Milker Who Gives Families Their Lives Back

I want to share one more story—one that’s circulated through Minnesota’s dairy community and captures something essential about what survival really looks like in this industry.

Michele Schroeder’s family dairy farm in Glenwood sold their cows in 2018-2019. Rock-bottom milk prices. Bulk tank needed replacement. The writing was on the wall.

The last night before the cows left, all five family members milked together. There were tears—some more than others. Who would have thought that years of working every day without a break, the stress of paying bills, dealing with bitter cold and extreme heat day in and day out would result in tears at the end?

But here’s what happened next. Instead of leaving dairy entirely, Michele became a relief milker for other farms—showing up so families can take the breaks she never got to take.

She regularly drives—sometimes 45 minutes or more, often in the dark—to milk someone else’s cows. In an industry that lost 58 dairy permits in a single month (November 2023, according to state data), she’s become a quiet lifeline for families trying to hang on.

That means a family gets to attend a kid’s game. Or just sleep. Or have a conversation that doesn’t end with someone walking away.

Her husband Jason joining the township board made a difference for their family—thinking and doing something completely different, a mental break from the constant weight of farming.

One farmer she milks for had a father who was dying of cancer. Every milking she covered meant the family could continue harvest while saying goodbye.

That’s what survival looks like. Not just hanging on yourself—but showing up so others can hang on too.

The Warning Signs Nobody Talks About

Agricultural mental health professionals and clinical research identify patterns that signal a farm family may need support:

  • Arguments about farm decisions that circle back to the same unresolved tensions
  • One partner feeling invisible, unheard, or carrying the emotional weight alone
  • Avoiding financial conversations because they always end badly
  • Physical exhaustion that doesn’t lift even after rest
  • Irritability that’s becoming the default, not the exception
  • Kids are starting to sense the tension, even when you think you’re hiding it
  • Fantasies about just driving away—even for an hour

None of these make you broken. They make you human—a human carrying more than anyone should carry alone.

If you recognized yourself in that list, you’re not alone. You’re just at the point where Katie was when she sent that email instead of driving 95 miles per hour down a back road.

She made the harder choice. And it saved everything.

What Survival Really Looks Like

The industry will tell you we’re losing thousands of dairy farms each year. We’ll debate make allowances, milk pricing formulas, and export markets. But there’s a question underneath all the data that nobody seems willing to ask: How many of those farms are failing because the marriage failed first?

Katie and Matt are proof that it doesn’t have to end that way. They asked for help. They did the weekly meetings. They learned to argue on the same team. Their daughter is learning what it takes to run a business from a kitchen table in Glenwood—and she’s also learning that her parents love each other enough to fight for the marriage, not just the farm.

Their story proves it’s possible”. They restructured everything. Found new roles. They’re still milking 40 cows, still married, still showing that sometimes the unconventional choice is the only one that works.

Monica McConkey keeps answering her phone. So do Jennifer Vaughn in northern Minnesota and Tracie Rutherford-Self in the south. Relief milkers like Michele Schroeder keep showing up—often in the dark, often far from home—so another family can catch their breath.

Not every story ends this way. Some couples wait too long. Some farms can’t be saved even when the marriage survives. That’s the truth of it.

But Katie and Matt are proof that it’s possible. Thomas and Kristin are proof there’s more than one way through. And sometimes that’s enough—knowing it’s possible. Knowing you don’t have to figure it out alone.

This is what survival looks like. Not white-knuckling through alone. Not pretending everything’s fine when the kitchen-table conversations have gone silent. Not driving 95 miles per hour, hoping to outrun something that’ll be waiting when you get home.

Survival looks like sending that email. Making that call. Saying out loud, to someone who understands, “We need help.”

In an industry that prizes self-reliance, that’s not weakness. It’s a strategy. It’s deciding that staying afloat matters more than looking strong.

And for Katie, for Thomas and Kristin, for the families Michele milks for—it turned out to be the decision that saved everything else.

If You Need Help

Minnesota Farm & Rural Helpline: 833-600-2670 (free, confidential, 24/7)

Text: “FARMSTRESS” to 898211

Monica McConkey (Western MN): (218) 280-7785

Jennifer Vaughn (Northern MN): (218) 820-6626

Tracie Rutherford-Self (Southern MN): (507) 514-7057

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (nationwide, 24/7)

For Canadian Producers: Contact your provincial farm stress line—every province has free, confidential support. In Ontario: 1-866-267-6255. In Alberta: 1-800-387-6030. In Manitoba: 1-866-367-3276.

You don’t have to explain what calving season means. You don’t have to justify why you can’t just “take a vacation.” You just have to reach out.

The farm can wait an hour. Your family can’t wait forever.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The metric nobody tracks: We obsess over milk prices and margins, but nobody counts how many farms fail because the marriage failed first—and it’s more than you think
  • 95 mph or one email: Katie Elvehjem was ready to bolt. She sent an email to a therapist instead. Two years later, she and her husband call their marriage “solid.”
  • Same team, not opposing sides: The couples who survive aren’t fighting less—they’re fighting together. Weekly financial meetings turned kitchen-table wars into planning sessions.
  • Free help exists—use it: Monica McConkey: (218) 280-7785. Minnesota Farm & Rural Helpline: 833-600-2670. No insurance. No cost. No judgment. Just someone who gets it.
  • Self-reliance is killing us: The families in this article did something the industry calls weakness. Turns out it was the smartest business decision they ever made.

This story draws on Jenny Berg’s deeply reported feature in the Star Tribune (December 2025), research from the University of Georgia Extension, Minnesota Department of Agriculture records, Federal Reserve agricultural credit data, and verified industry sources. The families profiled agreed to share their experiences publicly in hopes of helping others find the courage to reach out. If your story could help someone else, we want to hear from you: editor@thebullvine.com.

Learn More

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

The Great Drought Wake-Up Call: Why Australia’s Crisis Just Shattered Every Sacred Cow About “Smart” Farming

Australia’s worst drought in 125 years just destroyed every assumption about ‘smart’ farming. When $100k weekly feed costs become the new normal, the rules change!

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Australia’s unprecedented drought crisis is exposing the complete failure of traditional “drought planning” as farmers who followed every textbook rule are still drowning in $100,000 weekly feed costs and forced livestock liquidation. This isn’t just a regional disaster—it’s a preview of synchronized climate extremes that are breaking down traditional safety nets like inter-regional feed sourcing when multiple areas get hit simultaneously. The mental health crisis is as severe as the financial one, with 60% of farmers meeting criteria for depression while government response lags eight months behind farmer warnings. Traditional drought management assumes gradual deterioration allowing measured responses, but conditions now move from “tough to critical” in just two weeks, overwhelming all conventional coping mechanisms. The solution requires building “anti-fragile” systems that strengthen under stress through diversified infrastructure, redundant water sources, and technology investments that provide options during crisis rather than just efficiency during normal times. Smart farmers worldwide must abandon the myth that good management and conservative planning will see them through any challenge, because the climate has fundamentally changed and extreme events are becoming the new baseline rather than rare exceptions.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Traditional drought planning is dead – Farmers who built reserves, planned conservatively, and managed risk properly are still facing bankruptcy when feed markets completely fail and basic inputs become unavailable regardless of price.
  • Mental health is now a business-critical issue – With 60% of farmers meeting depression criteria compared to 17% in the general population, psychological resilience becomes as important as financial resilience for making sound operational decisions during crisis.
  • Infrastructure investments are survival tools, not luxuries – Water security, feed storage, and monitoring systems provide the redundancy and optionality needed to maintain functionality when primary systems fail during extreme events.
  • Government response will always lag crisis reality – Relying on policy support during emergencies is a fatal strategy when bureaucratic timelines operate in months while farm crises escalate in weeks.
  • Climate extremes are becoming synchronized globally – The breakdown of traditional inter-regional support systems means every dairy operation needs to prepare for extended periods without external assistance when multiple regions face simultaneous stress.
Australian drought crisis, dairy farming resilience, climate change agriculture, farm mental health, agricultural risk management

Australia’s worst drought in 125 years isn’t just breaking farms—it’s obliterating every comfortable myth we’ve told ourselves about agricultural resilience. When three generations of farmers call current conditions unprecedented, and operations burning $100,000 weekly on hay are the new normal, it’s time to ask the hard question: Have we been planning for yesterday’s droughts while tomorrow’s climate reality was already here?

Let me be brutally honest with you. If you’re reading this thinking, “That’s an Australian problem,” you’re making the same mistake that’s currently destroying generational dairy operations across Victoria. This isn’t about one country’s bad weather—this is about the complete failure of traditional risk management in an era where “unprecedented” has become the most overused word in agriculture.

Stop Calling It “Planning” When It’s Really Just Hoping

Here’s the first sacred cow we must slaughter: the myth that good dairy producers simply “plan for drought.” President of Dairy Farmers Victoria, Mark Billing, destroyed this comfortable fiction with one devastating observation: “Most farming businesses in the southwest plan for drought and build a reserve, but two years of low rainfall had depleted reserves.”

Did you catch that? These aren’t hobby farmers or weekend warriors. These are multi-generational operations that did everything the textbooks told them to do. They built silage reserves like stacking inventory for market volatility. They planned conservatively, maintaining optimal body condition scores through the summer. They managed cash flow risk like rotating breeding groups. And they’re still drowning.

Bernie Free, United Dairyfarmers of Victoria president, delivers the knockout punch: “We’ve had other periods where it has been dry, but we’ve been able to buy hay; now we’re at the stage where we can’t buy hay.” When the market for basic inputs completely fails—like trying to source quality genetics during a disease outbreak—your drought plan becomes as worthless as a broken milk line during peak lactation.

Question: If your “drought plan” assumes you can always buy feed at some price, do you really have a plan or just an expensive form of wishful thinking?

The Global Reality: It’s Not Just Australia Anymore

Want to know how widespread this problem is becoming? Australia’s dairy sector has contracted by 62% in just 25 years—from 7,400 farms in Victoria to fewer than 2,800 today. Last year alone, 8% of Victorian dairy farmers quit the business, while 11 milk processing plants closed nationwide.

But here’s what should terrify dairy producers worldwide: Australia’s milk production has shrunk to its lowest level in 30 years, with current production nearly 3 billion liters below the industry’s peak of 11.2 billion liters in the early 2000s. Meanwhile, dairy imports have nearly tripled to 27% over the past 22 years.

This pattern isn’t unique to Australia. The European heat waves of 2022, California’s persistent drought conditions, and flooding across the American Midwest all point to the same reality: climate extremes are becoming more frequent, severe, and synchronized across multiple regions simultaneously.

Think about it: What’s your backup plan when traditional safety valves—like sourcing feed from unaffected regions—break down because multiple areas get hit at once?

The $100,000 Weekly Reality Check

Let’s talk numbers that should terrify every dairy producer worldwide. Brendan Rea, who has been farming for 45 years in Victoria, is purchasing “four B-double loads of hay a week at ,000 a load”. That’s burning through $100,000 every seven days just to maintain basic nutrition—like feeding a maintenance ration that costs more than your milk check.

But here’s what should really keep you awake at night: This isn’t just happening to one farm. Ben Bennett, president of Australian Dairy Farmers, confirms his operation relies “100 percent on bought-in feed” and warns that the “market was getting tight.” When multiple operations in the same region compete for the same limited feed supplies, we’re not talking about high operational expenses anymore—we’re witnessing market failure for critical input.

Research from Australian farming communities reveals that operations most impacted by drought share three critical vulnerabilities: lower levels of business management skills, inadequate pre-drought preparedness during non-drought periods, and slower responses when drought intensity increases.

Think about it: When was the last time you stress-tested your operation against feed costs that exceeded your milk revenue for six consecutive months?

The Mental Health Catastrophe Hidden in Plain Sight

Here’s a devastating statistic that should shock every agricultural leader: Research shows that 60% of both adult farmers and their adolescent children meet the criteria for at least mild depression, while 55% of adults and 45% of adolescents qualify for generalized anxiety disorder. Compare that to the general population’s depression rate of just 17-18%, and you’re looking at a mental health crisis of unprecedented proportions.

The most alarming finding? Farm debt shows a high correlation with depressed mood in adults, which directly correlates with adolescent depression and anxiety. This isn’t just about individual suffering—it’s about the complete breakdown of knowledge transfer to the next generation.

Bernie Free doesn’t sugarcoat the psychological reality: “Farmers are pretty depressed.” Brendan Rea captures the psychological torture: “It’s very difficult to look at another weather forecast and another feed bill and continue on with enthusiasm.”

The uncomfortable truth: Mental health support isn’t soft psychology—it’s hard economics. Farmers in a psychological crisis make poor decisions about culling, miss opportunities for financial assistance, and often wait too long to implement necessary herd management changes.

Building Anti-Fragile Systems: The Technical Solutions You Need

Australian drought research reveals that resilient farming operations follow specific technical protocols that go far beyond traditional “drought planning.” Here are the evidence-based strategies that separate survivors from casualties:

Feed Security Framework

Research indicates that truly resilient operations maintain one tonne of dry matter per hectare farmed or 30 days of feed reserves when the forage cycle is finished. But that’s just the baseline. Progressive operations are implemented:

  • Multi-source feed contracting: Forward contracts with suppliers in different geographic regions to prevent single-point-of-failure scenarios
  • Alternative feed identification: Pre-negotiated access to non-traditional feeds like cotton seeds and almond hulls that become available during grain shortages
  • Storage infrastructure investment: On-farm storage capacity for 60-90 days of feed, eliminating dependence on just-in-time delivery during crisis periods

Monitoring and Decision Support Systems

The research emphasizes systematic monitoring as essential: quantifying and measuring forage growth, crop yields year-to-year, current production versus requirements, and silage quality metrics. Smart operations are investing in:

  • Automated pasture monitoring: Satellite-based systems that track biomass production and predict shortfalls 2-3 weeks before visual confirmation
  • Feed quality testing: Regular nutritional analysis to optimize supplementation strategies and reduce waste
  • Financial threshold modeling: Predetermined decision points for culling, purchasing feed, and accessing emergency credit

Water Security Infrastructure

John Fahey’s observation that “We’re not as bad as farms east of the Curdies River because we have underground water” highlights the critical importance of secure water access. Research-backed investments include:

  • Diversified water sources: Combination of groundwater, surface water rights, and emergency storage capacity
  • Efficient irrigation systems: Precision irrigation technology that maximizes pasture production per unit of water
  • Water recycling systems: On-farm treatment and reuse systems for reducing dependency on external sources

The Economics of Survival vs. Thriving

Here’s the brutal economic reality: Australian milk production is forecast to recover to just 8.7 billion liters by 2024-2025 under optimistic scenarios but could fall below 8.2 billion liters under continued drought conditions. That represents a permanent contraction of production capacity as farms exit and processing infrastructure closes.

The Murray-Darling Basin water buyback program is simultaneously removing water access from agricultural production, creating a double squeeze of climate pressure and policy pressure that’s pushing operations beyond viability thresholds.

Investment ROI Analysis for Resilience Infrastructure:

Based on Australian farm data, here’s what smart resilience investments actually cost and return:

  • Emergency feed storage (90-day capacity): Initial investment of $150,000-$300,000 for 500-head operation, break-even after 2-3 drought events
  • Groundwater access development: $75,000-$200,000 investment, provides 15-20% production stability during drought years
  • Automated monitoring systems: $25,000-$50,000 investment, reduces feed waste by 8-12% annually while providing early warning capabilities

Question: If a single drought can cost you $100,000 weekly in emergency feed purchases, what’s the real cost of not investing in resilience infrastructure?

The Anti-Fragile Farm: Beyond Survival to Strength

Australia’s crisis forces us to move beyond traditional resilience toward what Nassim Taleb calls “anti-fragility”—dairy systems that strengthen under stress rather than merely surviving it. Research shows that the most successful operations don’t just survive droughts—they use crisis periods to gain competitive advantages while neighbors struggle.

Design principles for anti-fragile dairy operations:

  • Diversification is essential in revenue streams, production systems, and market access. Operations dependent on single production methods or markets become uniquely vulnerable when conditions change rapidly.
  • Redundancy in critical systems prevents single points of failure. Multiple water sources, diverse feed options, and flexible facility infrastructure allow continued operation when primary systems fail.
  • Optionality creates opportunities to benefit from volatility. Operations positioned to expand when competitors fail or pivot to different markets when conditions change can actually improve their position during crisis periods.

The Government Response Gap: What Every Farmer Should Expect

Want to know how unprepared our policy systems are for real crises? Ben Bennett delivers the most damning indictment of government responsiveness: “We provided significant evidence eight months ago, and we’ve just heard crickets, and things continue to go downhill.”

Eight months. That’s enough time for dairy operations to exhaust feed reserves, sell breeding stock, and accumulate crippling debt. When bureaucrats acknowledge a crisis, farmers have already made irreversible decisions about genetic lines that took decades to develop.

Here’s the hard truth: If your survival strategy depends on the government’s response, you’re already dead in the water.

The specific requests from Australian farmers reveal just how inadequate our support systems are:

  • Interest rate subsidies for young producers carrying expansion debt
  • Transport subsidies when trucking costs exceed commodity value
  • Formal drought declarations to unlock programs that should already exist
  • Protection from price gouging during crisis periods

Question: If these basic protections don’t exist before crisis hits, what makes you think they’ll appear when you need them most?

The Technology Gap That’s Creating Winners and Losers

While Australia’s farmers struggle with immediate survival, their crisis illuminates the growing importance of technological resilience in modern dairy operations. Operations with secure water access, efficient irrigation systems, and sophisticated monitoring capabilities survive. At the same time, neighbors fail—like herds with automated health monitoring systems that catch problems early versus those relying on visual observation alone.

The brutal reality: Traditional rain-fed pasture systems that worked reliably for generations are now potentially catastrophic vulnerabilities.

Ask yourself: How many single points of failure exist in your current production system?

The Youth Exodus: Losing the Next Generation

Hidden within Australia’s immediate crisis lies a longer-term catastrophe—the exodus of young farmers. Research shows strong correlations between adult depression and adolescent depression on farms, creating a psychological barrier to next-generation succession that compounds the economic barriers.

Young dairy farmers typically carry higher debt loads from facility modernization and expansion and have fewer accumulated reserves to weather extended crises. The current situation, where operations require $100,000 weekly just for basic feed, creates impossible financial pressures for beginning farmers—like asking a new graduate to manage a 2,000-cow facility during a market crash.

Each farm exit represents lost genetic material, infrastructure, and, most critically, accumulated knowledge about local conditions and optimal management practices.

Building the Future: Strategic Investments That Actually Work

Based on Australian research and farmer experience, here are the infrastructure investments that provide measurable returns during a crisis:

Water Security (Highest Priority)

  • Underground water access: $100,000-$250,000 investment provides 20-30% production stability during drought
  • Efficient irrigation systems: 15-25% improvement in water use efficiency, critical when water becomes scarce or expensive
  • Emergency water storage: 60–90-day capacity prevents catastrophic dehydration events

Feed Security (Second Priority)

  • On-farm storage facilities: Reduces emergency feed costs by 40-60% during shortage periods
  • Alternative feed processing capability: The ability to utilize non-traditional feeds reduces dependence on hay markets
  • Forward contracting systems: Locks in feed availability and pricing before crisis periods

Decision Support Technology (Third Priority)

  • Automated monitoring systems: Provides 2–3-week advance warning of pasture shortfalls
  • Financial modeling tools: Helps optimize culling and purchasing decisions under stress
  • Weather prediction integration: Links local conditions to management decision triggers

The Bottom Line: Time to Rewrite the Rules

Australia’s drought crisis isn’t just a regional disaster—it’s a preview of the new reality facing dairy operations worldwide. The speed and severity of the collapse should shatter any remaining illusions about traditional risk management approaches working in an era of climate extremes.

Here’s what the Australian farmers are really telling us:

  • Traditional drought planning becomes inadequate when extreme events exceed historical variability
  • Feed markets can fail completely under stress, making market-based solutions insufficient
  • Government response typically lags crisis reality by months or years
  • Mental health support becomes as critical as nutritional management during extended stress periods
  • Infrastructure and technology create competitive advantages during extreme events
  • The geographic concentration of production capacity creates systemic vulnerabilities

Your action plan starts now:

  1. Audit your vulnerability to extended extreme weather. Model scenarios that exceed your worst historical experience by 50%. If your current risk management plan fails under those conditions, it’s inadequate for the future.
  2. Invest in resilience infrastructure that provides options during stress. Water security, feed storage, and monitoring systems aren’t luxuries—they’re survival tools as essential as having backup systems for critical facility operations.
  3. Strengthen relationships with suppliers, lenders, and government officials before you need them. Crisis management begins during profitable years, not when disaster strikes.
  4. Build mental health and community support systems into your risk management plan. The Australian experience shows that psychological resilience becomes as important as financial resilience when facing unprecedented challenges.

The old assumption that good dairy management practices and conservative financial management would see you through any challenge is dead. Australia’s dairy farmers followed all the traditional rules and still found themselves fighting for survival.

The question isn’t whether extreme events will hit your region—it’s whether you’ll be prepared when they do. The farmers still fighting in drought-stricken areas of Australia aren’t just battling for their own survival. They’re providing intelligence about the future of milk production worldwide.

Are you listening?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Weekly for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend