Archive for Canada dairy tariffs

Trump’s Tariff Gambit: Will Dairy Farmers Win or Lose in Global Trade Showdown?

Trump’s tariff gamble: Dairy sees trade war leverage while grain fears collapse. Will new tariffs crack EU cheese barriers or spark Chinese retaliation?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: President Trump’s new tariffs on major trade partners have divided agriculture, with dairy leaders cautiously supporting the measures as potential leverage against long-standing EU cheese restrictions (blocking $168M in exports) and Canada’s quota system (where U.S. exports fill less than 30% of allowed volumes). However, grain producers warn of permanent market loss to Brazil, citing 2018’s $25B trade war damage. The tariffs target EU GIs, India’s lactose taxes, and China’s retaliatory risks, with dairy advocating for swift negotiations to dismantle barriers. While the strategy could pressure reforms, farmers face uncertainty as implementation begins today.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Canada’s dairy paradox: 200%+ tariffs exist but apply only if exports exceed quotas—a scenario that’s never occurred due to systemic barriers.
  • EU’s $168M cheese blockade: Geographical Indications block U.S. products from using names like “feta,” costing millions annually.
  • China gamble: 34% tariffs risk retaliation in America’s third-largest dairy export market ($584M), already down 12% YoY.
  • Sector divide: Dairy backs tariffs as negotiation tools; grain growers fear irreversible market loss, per Purdue’s Ag Barometer.
  • TRQ reality: Complex tariff-rate quotas govern global dairy trade, with most countries failing to fill allocated volumes.

As President Trump’s newly announced tariffs are set to take effect tomorrow, dairy industry leaders are expressing cautious optimism that these measures could help address longstanding trade barriers that have hindered U.S. dairy exports. The tariff plan, which includes both a baseline 10% duty on all imports and higher targeted rates for specific countries, is being viewed by some dairy representatives as a potential lever to create more equitable trade conditions.

Breaking Down Trump’s Bold Tariff Strategy for Dairy Markets

President Donald Trump unveiled his tariff plan during a “Make America Wealthy Again” event at the White House Rose Garden, announcing a universal 10% tariff on all imports beginning April 5, 2025, with additional targeted tariffs on countries with which the U.S. has significant trade deficits starting April 9. The higher rates include 34% for China, 20% for the European Union, and targeted percentages for countries including Vietnam (46%), Japan (24%), and India (26%).

Unlike some agricultural sectors expressing concern, dairy industry leaders offered measured support for the administration’s approach. Gregg Doud, President and CEO of the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) framed the tariffs as potentially beneficial for U.S. dairy producers.

“Tariffs can be a useful tool for negotiating fairer terms of trade,” Doud stated. “We are glad to see the administration focusing on long-time barriers to trade that the European Union and India have imposed on our exports.”

Krysta Harden, President and CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that a “firm hand and decisive approach” is particularly needed with the European Union and India “to correct their distortive trade policies and mistreatment of American agriculture.”

The USMCA Paradox: How Canada Blocks U.S. Milk Despite “Zero” Tariffs

President Trump has specifically highlighted Canadian dairy policies as problematic, claiming Canada imposes tariffs of 250-270% on U.S. dairy products. While these high rates do exist on paper, the reality is more complex and often misrepresented.

These triple-digit tariffs would only apply if U.S. exports exceeded predetermined quota thresholds established under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump himself negotiated during his first term. Below these quotas, American dairy sales to Canada face zero tariffs.

The critical fact often overlooked is that U.S. dairy exports have never come close to reaching these quota limits. For dairy products subject to a quota year tariff, the average fill rate as of March 2025 was only 21.24%. In practice, this means “these tariffs are not actually paid by anyone,” according to agricultural economists.

“We’ve never hit 50% of our tariff-free milk quota. Canada’s system is designed to look open while keeping U.S. products out.”

Becky Rasdall Vargas, IDFA Senior VP of Trade Policy
Dairy ProductTRQ Year Basis2024 Fill RateMarch 2025 Fill Rate
Cheese & CurdCalendar18%14%
Skim Milk PowderQuota (Aug-Jul)32%23%
Fluid MilkCalendar29%19%
ButterQuota (Aug-Jul)41%27%

The real issue, according to U.S. dairy representatives, lies in Canada’s implementation of the quota system. Becky Rasdall Vargas, senior vice president of trade and workforce policy at the IDFA, argues that “Canada imposes unfair barriers that make it increasingly difficult for U.S. products to enter the Canadian market”.

“Our complaint is we’re not able to get anywhere near the quota cap, even though we have buyers who tell us they would like to bring in our product,” Rasdall Vargas explained.

USMCA Promised Big Gains for Dairy—But Delivery Falls Short

The USMCA established significant growth in market access for U.S. dairy exports to Canada, with TRQ volumes scheduled to increase substantially over the agreement’s implementation period.

Product CategoryYear 1 TRQYear 6 TRQYear 19 TRQGrowth Mechanism
Cheese10,416 MT15,624 MT17,860 MT+25% Y3, +20% Y6, +1% annually
Skim Milk Powder5,000 MT7,500 MT8,575 MT+50% Y2, +1% annually
Fluid Milk7,000 MT10,500 MT12,005 MT+33% Y3, +1% annually
Butter3,000 MT4,500 MT5,145 MT+50% Y2, +1% annually

Under CUSMA (the Canadian term for USMCA), butter TRQs increased by 25% in the 2023/24 dairy year. With an 81.3% fill rate, this year’s rate is lower than last year’s at 97%, indicating some challenges in fully utilizing the expanded market access.

$168 Million Lost: How EU Cheese Rules Block American Exports

The relatively moderate 20% tariff on European Union goods reflects a strategic approach to a complex trade relationship. According to Doud, this rate is “a bargain for the EU considering the highly restrictive tariff and nontariff barriers the EU imposes on our dairy exporters.”

One of the most contentious issues between U.S. and EU dairy trade involves Geographical Indications (GIs), which the EU uses to protect regional food names. These designations prevent U.S. cheesemakers from labeling their products as “feta” or “gorgonzola” when exporting to EU markets, as these terms are reserved for regionally produced cheeses.

The EU’s GI restrictions effectively “erase American products from store shelves overseas,” as Krysta Harden of USDEC has noted, blocking $168 million in potential U.S. cheese exports in 2024 alone.

“If Europe retaliates against the United States, we encourage the administration to respond strongly by raising tariffs on European cheeses and butter,” Doud stated, signaling the industry’s support for a tough stance on this issue.

China’s $584 Million Dairy Market at Risk: Will Retaliation Follow?

The highest targeted tariff rate—34% on Chinese goods—raises significant questions for U.S. dairy exports to what has become America’s third-largest dairy export market, worth $584 million in 2024. U.S. dairy exports to China declined by 12% year-over-year in 2024, reaching their lowest level since 2020, a trend that could be exacerbated by new trade tensions.

China has previously imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. dairy imports in response to earlier Trump-era tariffs, with dairy products facing a 10% duty. During the 2018 trade war, these retaliatory measures cost dairy farmers $1.5 billion in lost revenue. With the new 34% U.S. tariff set to take effect April 9, there is concern about potential escalation.

“China will take necessary measures to firmly safeguard its legitimate interests against these WTO-violating tariffs.”

Guo Jiakun, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson

Chinese officials have already signaled their opposition to the new tariffs. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated that the measures “seriously violate WTO rules” and promised that “China will resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its legitimate interests”.

The Trade Barrier Paradox: U.S. Import Quotas Remain Unfilled Too

While much attention focuses on barriers to U.S. exports, it’s worth noting that many countries face challenges accessing the U.S. market as well. Current data shows varying utilization rates for dairy TRQs established under U.S. free trade agreements:

Trade PartnerTRQ Type2024 UtilizationKey Barrier
CanadaCheese1%Quota allocation complexity
EUButter44%GI restrictions
MexicoSMP8%Section 232 tariffs

This data from the USDA Dairy Import Circular shows that trade barriers can flow in both directions, with complex quota systems sometimes limiting the effectiveness of market access provisions.

“We’re Handing China to Brazil”: Grain Farmers Fear Permanent Market Loss

While dairy industry representatives see potential benefits in Trump’s tariff strategy, grain producers have expressed significant concerns. Chase Dewitz, who operates a large farming operation in North Dakota, worries about permanent market loss.

“We’re handing China to Brazil,” warns Dewitz, reflecting grain growers’ fears of losing export markets. “I think there’s going to be some pain here for a while, and the biggest thing is these export markets.”

These concerns are reflected in broader industry sentiment, with 43% of farmers citing shifting trade policy as their primary concern in the Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer for March.

During the 2018 trade war with China, U.S. agriculture experienced more than $25 billion in losses. The United States has yet to fully recover its former market share of soybean exports to China, the world’s largest buyer of the commodity.

“Tariffs tear us apart—raising input costs while crushing commodity prices. This isn’t trade policy; it’s economic vivisection.”

Vance Ehmke, Kansas Farmer (6th Generation)

“These tariffs are just absolutely bad news,” said Vance Ehmke from the western Kansas farm his ancestors homesteaded in 1885. “They cause the prices for everything that we buy to go up, and the price for everything that we sell to go down. I mean, it is being economically drawn and quartered”.

Tariff Rate Quotas Explained: Why the “Milk Tank” Analogy Matters

Think of Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) like a milk tank—fill it tax-free, but overflow costs steeply. Both the U.S. and Canada use this system for dairy products, allowing a certain number of imports at low or zero tariffs, with significantly higher rates applied to imports exceeding these quotas.

For example, while U.S. dairy exports to Canada face potential tariffs of 241-298.5% if they exceed quota limits, these exports have never reached even 50% of their tariff-free allocation. Similarly, Canadian butter exported to the U.S. faces no tariffs under quota thresholds but would be subject to over-quota tariffs of about 24-39%.

Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for dairy producers navigating international markets and evaluating the potential impact of Trump’s new tariff strategy.

Will Your Dairy Operation Benefit or Suffer Under New Tariffs?

As the April 5 implementation date approaches tomorrow, dairy producers should consider how these tariffs might affect their specific operations. Would a 34% tariff on Chinese imports benefit your bottom line? Or would retaliatory bans on milk powder erase your profits?

The contrasting reactions between dairy and grain sectors highlight the diverse impacts trade policies can have across different agricultural commodities. While dairy organizations see an opportunity to leverage tariffs for negotiations with problematic partners like the EU, India, and Canada, they also emphasize the importance of quickly resolving tensions with constructive trading partners.

“Through productive negotiations, this administration can help achieve a level playing field for U.S. dairy producers by tackling the numerous tariff and nontariff trade barriers that bog down our exports,” Doud stated.

Tariffs as Leverage: Strategic Tool or Economic Self-Harm?

As the dairy industry navigates the complex landscape of international trade, the response to Trump’s tariff announcement reflects a strategic calculation: potential short-term disruption weighed against the possibility of addressing persistent barriers to U.S. dairy exports.

“Every farmer says trade needs fixing—until it affects their bottom line. Well, buckle up: this storm will hit us all.”

James Mintert, Purdue Ag Economist

“Broad and prolonged tariffs on our top trading partners and growing markets will risk undermining our investments, raising costs for American businesses and consumers, and creating uncertainty for American dairy farmers and rural communities,” warns Becky Rasdall Vargas of the IDFA.

The dairy sector appears poised to support targeted use of tariffs while advocating for swift negotiations to expand export opportunities and eliminate both tariff and non-tariff barriers that have limited U.S. dairy’s global competitiveness. As implementation begins tomorrow, the industry will be watching closely to see whether these tariffs serve as effective negotiating tools or trigger costly trade conflicts.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Trade Wars vs. Trade Wins: U.S. Dairy Relations with Canada and Mexico

Is Mexico truly a better dairy trade partner for the U.S. than Canada? Dive into market access, trade policies, and economic perks. What’s your take?

Summary:

The debate often centers around Canada and Mexico when considering the best trading partner for U.S. dairy from a conservative perspective. Both countries play significant roles in the dairy trade under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). However, Mexico seems to be pulling ahead due to its open market policies and zero tariffs, facilitating smoother trade relations. In contrast, Canada’s complex tariff rate quotas (TRQs) and protective measures have led to trade disputes. With U.S. dairy exports valued at $9.6 billion in 2023, identifying trading opportunities is crucial. Canada’s tariffs and protective measures pose significant challenges for U.S. exporters despite the substantial trade value reaching almost $800 million. Meanwhile, the U.S.-Mexico partnership has strengthened, with U.S. dairy exports to Mexico increasing by 59% from 2014 to 2023 to$1.4 billion. Major exports to Mexico include nonfat dry milk (NDM) and skim milk powder (SMP), making Mexico responsible for almost one-third of all NFDM/SMP exports from the U.S. Cheese shipments have also climbed by about 80% over the same period, highlighting the favorable trade environment and geographical proximity that benefit this relationship.

Key Takeaways:

  • Mexico is the largest market for U.S. dairy exports, benefiting from zero tariffs and a collaborative trade relationship under the USMCA.
  • Canada, a significant market, imposes protective measures and complex TRQ systems that hinder U.S. dairy exports.
  • Despite USMCA reforms, Canada poses challenges through its dairy pricing system and TRQ measures.
  • Mexico’s open market policies and joint efforts with the U.S. help promote dairy consumption and productivity, creating a favorable export environment.
  • Canada’s supply management system supports local farmers but limits U.S. market access, which results in higher prices for Canadian consumers.
  • Ongoing trade disputes with Canada highlight U.S. dairy exporters’ difficulties, contrasted with the smoother relationship with Mexico.
  • Future outlook suggests persistent challenges in the U.S.-Canada dairy trade while the U.S.-Mexico relationship thrives.
  • Overall, Mexico offers a more reliable and advantageous partnership for U.S. dairy exports than Canada.
U.S. dairy exports, Canada dairy tariffs, USMCA trade agreement, Mexico dairy market, dairy export growth, nonfat dry milk exports, cheese exports to Mexico, dairy trade challenges, tariff rate quotas, U.S. dairy industry value

Did you know that the U.S. dairy industry’s export value in 2023 alone was a staggering $9.6 billion? With such a substantial contribution to the economy, it’s crucial to identify the most promising trading opportunities. Which country is a more favorable partner for the United States dairy industry: Canada, with its stringent TRQs and protective measures, or Mexico, with its open market and zero tariffs? This essay will delve into the complexities of dairy trade under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and determine which countries emerge as the top trading partners for U.S. exports.

Canada and Mexico stand out differently when considering market access and trade volume for U.S. dairy exports. Both markets hold substantial prospects, but each faces hurdles under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

Canada 

Canada is an important market for U.S. dairy goods, with fluid milk and cheese prospects. However, optimism fades owing to Canada’s restrictive trade regulations. Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) management presents considerable hurdles for U.S. exporters. Although the USMCA sought to alleviate these constraints, ongoing trade battles impede complete market access.

Canada’s dairy industry uses a supply management system to maintain local output and pricing, which limits imported dairy products. Despite the USMCA’s elimination of the contentious Class 7 pricing mechanism, Canada continues to deploy sophisticated TRQs to protect its market. This strategy has resulted in many disagreements between the two nations.

The United States objections to Canada’s TRQ allocations have had inconsistent results, highlighting the persistent complexity of managing these trade obstacles. These protective restrictions prevent U.S. dairy exporters from fully capitalizing on new market opportunities. Frustration with Canada’s failure to fully implement trade agreements causes recurrent tensions and disagreements, jeopardizing the stability and predictability required for long-term trading ties.

The U.S. dairy business interacted significantly with the Canadian market in 2023, but the statistics indicate underlying trade difficulties. Cheese, butter, and milk powders were among the products exported to Canada, reaching almost $800 million. While this accounts for a significant share of U.S. dairy exports, it also highlights the constraints imposed by Canada’s protective measures and TRQ laws. Despite these obstacles, the trade volume between the two countries demonstrates the possibility of more substantial exchanges if trade barriers are well controlled.

Mexico 

When we switch our focus to Mexico, the terrain seems more welcoming. Mexico is the biggest market for U.S. dairy exports, with no tariffs on dairy goods. The USMCA strengthened this partnership, assuring easy and steady market access. Mexico’s historical dependence on dairy products imported from the United States significantly reinforces this link. There are fewer obstacles here, with no tariff barriers and a cooperative partnership aimed at mutual progress.

The collaborative spirit of the USMCA has preserved Mexico as the leading consumer of U.S. dairy, aided by a zero-tariff regime on dairy imports. Unlike Canada, Mexico has maintained its commitment to free trade, strengthened by reciprocal endeavors to increase dairy consumption and production. This cooperative posture makes it easier for U.S. dairy products to enter Mexican markets. It encourages combined efforts to grow and enhance the dairy industry in both nations.

From 2014 to 2023, U.S. dairy exports to Mexico saw a significant 59% increase, from just under 1 billion pounds to over 1.6 billion pounds. Over the same period, overall U.S. dairy exports increased by 19%, or 942 million pounds, with Mexico driving much of this growth. With other markets expected to purchase less U.S. dairy in 2024, Mexico’s imports have already surpassed 2023 levels. By July 2024, exports had exceeded 950 million pounds, up 2% from the first seven months of 2023. This trend indicates a promising future for U.S. dairy exports to Mexico.

Favorable trade agreements and geographical closeness have aided this connection. The most significant exports to Mexico are nonfat dry milk (NDM) and skim milk powder (SMP). A decade ago, Mexico accounted for almost one-third of all NFDM/SMP exports from the United States; this figure is expected to rise to nearly 50% by 2023. 35% of the 2.56 billion pounds produced in 2023 were sent to Mexico for use in culinary applications, cheese fortification, and reconstituted milk.

Cheese is the second biggest category. From 2014 to 2023, cheese shipments to Mexico climbed by about 80%, reaching approximately 327 million pounds. Market share increased from 20% to 35%. Exports may achieve a new record in 2024, even if cheese shipments are delayed owing to rising costs. NFDM/SMP sales will increase as Mexican processors switch to U.S. powder.

The USMCA and NAFTA have played pivotal roles in the growth of U.S. dairy exports to Mexico, opening up new markets and boosting demand and pricing. These agreements have driven the rapid expansion of U.S. dairy exports to Mexico over the past decade. However, a weak Mexican peso may pose a challenge as U.S. products become more expensive. Despite this, the future of U.S. dairy exports to Mexico looks promising, thanks to robust trade agreements and geographical advantages.

Mexico is a better partner for U.S. dairy exports. Its open market, minimal tariffs, and collaborative attitude outperformed Canada’s convoluted TRQ policies and protectionist position. While Canada has market potential, its problems cannot be overlooked. Mexico has a consistent and transparent market, making it a more appealing partner. Canada’s aggressive approach creates impediments, but Mexico’s cooperative policies offer a more streamlined environment. This disparity significantly impacts U.S. dairy market penetration, making Mexico the superior overall partner. The importance of the U.S.-Mexico dairy trade relationship cannot be overstated, and it is a testament to the value and significance of the audience in this context.

Deciding whether Canada or Mexico makes for a better partner with the U.S. is no small feat when trading dairy products. Let’s break it down with complex numbers to see who stands out in this fierce trading battle. 

CountryTotal U.S. Dairy Exports (in USD)Tariffs on Dairy ProductsMarket Access under USMCARecent Trade Disputes
Canada$731 millionVariable, with TRQsComplex, with ongoing disputesYes
Mexico$1.4 billionZeroSmooth and cooperativeNo

Battle of Borders: Recent Developments in U.S.-Canada Dairy Trade

Recent developments in the US-Canada dairy trade relationship have been defined by ongoing trade disputes and judicial fights over Canada’s TRQ allocation mechanisms. Despite the USMCA’s goal of reforming the dairy industry, Canada’s use of protective regulations has resulted in various conflicts. Recent verdicts have often supported Canada’s TRQ administration, much to the chagrin of U.S. dairy exporters, who allege that these policies limit market access. These continued conflicts indicate that the obstacles experienced by U.S. dairy exporters in Canada will undoubtedly endure, impeding the smooth increase of market share and causing uncertainty.

Unless significant legislative reforms are implemented, the future of the US-Canada dairy trading relationship will be dogged by ongoing conflicts and trade restrictions. The United States may continue to seek resolution via dispute settlements. Still, the chances of significant progress are slim, given Canada’s unwavering defensive attitude. On the other hand, the dairy trade relationship between the United States and Mexico is expected to strengthen and stabilize further. The continuous joint efforts and commitment to zero tariffs indicate a bright future in which both nations will benefit from a strong trade relationship.

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, our extensive research shows that Mexico is a better trade partner for the U.S. dairy business than Canada. Mexico’s dedication to open market policies, zero tariffs, and a proactive approach to collaborative efforts have laid the groundwork for a stable and mutually advantageous economic environment. In contrast, Canada’s protective TRQ policies and complicated trade dynamics provide considerable obstacles to U.S. dairy producers. With these considerations in mind, one must wonder: In a world where market stability and growth are critical, might the strategy taken with Mexico create a precedent for altering U.S. dairy trade tactics on a larger scale?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Send this to a friend