Archive for Management – Page 4

Addressing the Challenge of Surplus Calves in the Dairy Industry

The dairy industry is currently facing the complex issue of surplus calves, presenting a puzzle that requires careful consideration and innovative solutions. As calf numbers increase, dairy farmers and stakeholders must address the challenge of managing surplus calves in a sustainable and economically viable manner. This article explores the intricacies of the surplus calf puzzle and highlights the importance of finding effective strategies to ensure the welfare and long-term viability of these young animals.

The Surplus Calf Dilemma: The rising number of surplus calves in the dairy industry poses significant challenges for farmers and the sector as a whole. As a result of selective breeding and improved reproductive technologies, dairy cows are producing more calves than are needed to maintain and replace the milking herd. This surplus places a burden on farmers, as they must find suitable outlets for these animals, while ensuring their welfare and avoiding potential economic losses.

Finding Sustainable Solutions: Addressing the surplus calf puzzle requires a multifaceted approach that combines proactive measures and industry collaboration. Some strategies being explored include:

  1. Enhancing Market Opportunities: Developing and expanding markets for surplus calves, such as veal production, offers a potential solution. Collaboration with veal producers and market development initiatives can help create additional outlets for these animals, ensuring their economic value is maximized.
  2. Calf Health and Management: Prioritizing calf health and implementing robust management practices can improve calf survival rates and reduce health-related challenges. This includes providing appropriate nutrition, suitable housing conditions, and implementing effective disease prevention protocols.
  3. Genetic Selection and Breeding: Breed selection and genetic improvement programs can help reduce the number of surplus calves. By focusing on breeding cows with higher genetic merit for milk production while considering fertility and calving ease, farmers can minimize the surplus calf dilemma.
  4. Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: The dairy industry benefits from collaboration and knowledge sharing among farmers, researchers, and industry stakeholders. Sharing best practices, experiences, and innovations can lead to the development of effective strategies and new opportunities for managing surplus calves.

Investing in Research and Development: Continuous investment in research and development is crucial for finding sustainable solutions to the surplus calf puzzle. Research institutions and industry organizations play a vital role in studying calf management, welfare, and market dynamics. By supporting research initiatives, the dairy industry can gain valuable insights and develop evidence-based practices to optimize calf utilization and address the challenges associated with surplus calves.

Effectively managing surplus calves is a pressing issue in the dairy industry. By adopting a comprehensive approach that encompasses market development, calf health and management, genetic selection, collaboration, and research investments, the industry can work towards sustainable solutions. By addressing the surplus calf puzzle, the dairy sector can optimize animal welfare, economic viability, and long-term sustainability, ensuring a balanced and thriving dairy industry for the future.

Helping Dairy Calves Beat the Heat

As the summer temperatures soar, it becomes crucial to ensure the well-being of dairy calves, as they are particularly vulnerable to heat stress. High temperatures can lead to dehydration, reduced feed intake, and overall discomfort, negatively impacting the growth and health of these young animals. However, by implementing appropriate measures and management practices, dairy farmers can help calves beat the heat and maintain optimal health. This article explores some essential strategies to mitigate heat stress in dairy calves.

  1. Adequate Shelter and Ventilation: Providing calves with suitable shelter is essential to protect them from direct sunlight and extreme heat. Shaded areas or well-ventilated barns can help maintain a cooler environment. Natural ventilation, such as open windows or fans, should be utilized to promote air circulation and prevent stagnant, hot air.
  2. Adequate Water Supply: Water is crucial for hydration and thermoregulation in calves. Clean and fresh water should be available at all times, and water troughs or buckets should be checked regularly to ensure an adequate supply. Calves may consume more water during hot weather, so it’s important to monitor their intake and refill water sources as needed.
  3. Electrolyte Supplementation: Electrolytes play a vital role in maintaining proper hydration and electrolyte balance in calves. During hot weather, calves may lose electrolytes through sweating and panting. Providing electrolyte supplements in their water or milk replacer can help replenish these vital nutrients and prevent dehydration.
  4. Adjust Feeding Practices: Heat stress can reduce feed intake in calves, affecting their growth and development. To encourage feeding during hot weather, it’s important to adjust feeding practices. Feeding smaller and more frequent meals, using easily digestible feeds, and providing fresh and palatable feed can help stimulate appetite in calves and maintain their nutritional requirements.
  5. Adequate Bedding and Flooring: Bedding materials like straw or sand provide insulation from hot surfaces and help calves stay cool. Calves should have access to clean and dry bedding that is regularly maintained to prevent bacterial growth and excessive heat retention. Flooring surfaces should also be adequately designed to minimize heat absorption.
  6. Time Management: Scheduling activities involving calves should be adjusted to avoid the hottest parts of the day. Routine tasks such as feeding, handling, and moving calves should be planned for cooler periods in the morning or evening, reducing the risk of heat stress.
  7. Monitoring and Early Detection: Regular monitoring of calves’ behavior, such as excessive panting, drooling, or seeking shade, can help identify early signs of heat stress. Prompt action should be taken if any signs are observed, such as providing additional water, adjusting ventilation, or contacting a veterinarian for assistance.

Heat stress can have detrimental effects on the health and growth of dairy calves. By implementing appropriate measures such as providing adequate shelter, ensuring water availability, adjusting feeding practices, and monitoring calf behavior, farmers can help calves beat the heat and minimize the impact of high temperatures. Dairy calf welfare during summer is crucial for their long-term productivity and overall well-being.

Tackling Inaccurate Dairy Data: Strategies for Improved Accuracy

Accurate data is vital in the dairy industry to make informed decisions, optimize herd management, and enhance overall productivity. However, inaccurate data can hinder progress and lead to suboptimal outcomes. This article discusses various strategies to tackle inaccurate dairy data, ensuring that farmers have access to reliable information for effective decision-making and performance evaluation.

  1. Data Collection Protocols: Establishing clear and standardized data collection protocols is essential to minimize inaccuracies from the outset. Provide training and guidelines to the personnel responsible for data collection, ensuring they understand the importance of accurate and consistent data entry. Emphasize the use of reliable measuring instruments and appropriate recording techniques to improve data quality.
  2. Regular Data Audits: Conduct regular audits of the data to identify and rectify any inaccuracies. This involves cross-checking data entries with physical records, such as milking logs, veterinary reports, and feed inventories. By comparing and verifying data from different sources, discrepancies can be identified and corrected promptly.
  3. Automated Data Collection: Implementing automated data collection systems, such as electronic identification (EID) tags, milk meters, and activity monitors, can significantly reduce the likelihood of human errors. These systems provide accurate and real-time data directly into computerized record-keeping systems, minimizing manual data entry and associated inaccuracies.
  4. Quality Control Measures: Introduce quality control measures to validate the accuracy of collected data. This can include periodic data spot checks, where a sample of records is randomly selected and verified against the original source. Additionally, implementing data validation rules within computerized systems can help identify and flag potential errors during data entry.
  5. Training and Education: Invest in training programs and educational initiatives for staff involved in data collection and management. Provide comprehensive training on data entry techniques, standard operating procedures, and the importance of accurate data. By enhancing the knowledge and skills of personnel, the chances of errors and inaccuracies can be significantly reduced.
  6. Collaboration and Peer Reviews: Encourage collaboration among dairy farmers and industry professionals to review data collection and management practices. Conduct peer reviews where colleagues assess each other’s data for accuracy and provide constructive feedback. This collaborative approach promotes accountability and helps identify areas for improvement.
  7. Data Analytics and Validation Tools: Utilize advanced data analytics tools and software that can identify patterns, trends, and potential errors in the data. These tools can provide automated data validation checks, flagging outliers and inconsistencies for further investigation. By leveraging technology, farmers can streamline the data validation process and identify inaccuracies more efficiently.
  8. Continuous Improvement: Establish a culture of continuous improvement within the organization regarding data accuracy. Regularly assess data management practices, solicit feedback from stakeholders, and implement necessary changes. Encourage open communication channels to address concerns and challenges related to data accuracy.

Accurate dairy data is crucial for effective decision-making and improving overall herd management. By implementing strategies such as standardized protocols, regular audits, automated data collection, quality control measures, training initiatives, collaboration, and the use of data analytics tools, farmers can tackle inaccurate data and enhance the reliability of information. Ensuring accurate data leads to better insights, optimized operations, and improved productivity in the dairy industry.

Waikato dairy farmers face feed shortage due to wet weather

Sharemilker and Waikato Federated Farmers dairy chair Matthew Zonderop said there had not been a good dry spell since October.

Sharemilker and Waikato Federated Farmers dairy chair Matthew Zonderop said there had not been a good dry spell since October. Photo: Matthew Zonderop

Dairy farmers in Waikato are facing a feed shortage – with consistent rain destroying pastures.

A sharemilker in Te Poi and Waikato Federated Farmers dairy chair Matthew Zonderop said the region had not really had a decent dry spell since October.

“We’ve had strong gusts of wind which have been driving the rain, it’s very wet, the water table is extremely high and grasses are turning yellow from being saturated, so it’s pretty grim.

“There’s going to be a feed shortage. We’re using a lot of our spring supplement now to feed the cows because we can’t feed them enough grass because the growth rates are very low, so yeah we don’t have enough feed.”

Zonderop said any grass that was around was quickly trampled into the ground by the cows because the soil was so sodden.

“Because of all the rain the water table is really high, so it doesn’t take much for my paddocks to flood.

“Farmers are well versed at winters in Waikato so they can cope but we’re getting to the point where we are not coping.”

Farmers were taking more drastic measures like standing cows off on yards overnight, he said.

“It’s hard on the farmers’ mental well-being as well at the moment because we just don’t know where to go. We don’t know which way to turn anymore because our options are running out, it’s quite stressful.”

Bart van de Ven, a sharemilker in Springdale near Morrinsville, said the soil on his farm was so water-logged only 5mm of rain causes flooding.

The wet weather was causing big problems on his farm, he said.

“We had a pasture cover of 2600 around the 15th of May and we now have a pasture cover of 2100 which is kind of unusual because normally during the winter time you have dry cows and you go on a longer round and build up grass for calving but we’ve actually gone down which is the main worry for us.

“The paddocks are flooding and it takes a while for the water to drain away so we have to take the cows off a little bit more than we’re used to so there’s certainly no weight gain on the cows at the moment.”

Van de Ven said there was not enough grass around but he was lucky that he had a really good summer and made a lot of silage.

Weather Watch duty forecaster Philip Duncan said things were not going to get much better anytime soon.

“It looks as though there’s at least 60 to 100 millimetres of rain coming to the Waikato in the next four weeks, mostly due to low pressure still crossing over the South Island and some parts of the country.

“And obviously with more westerlies blowing, that does encourage that rain to go all the way up the North Island, so Auckland and Northland will also get rain but it does seem that the heaviest falls will hit Waikato southwards down towards Taranaki and the west coast of the South Island.”

Source: rnz.co.nz

The Impact of Probiotics on Calf Gut Health

Maintaining optimal gut health is crucial for the overall well-being and development of calves in the dairy industry. Probiotics, known as beneficial live microorganisms, have gained attention for their potential to enhance gut health and improve calf performance. In this article, we will explore the impact of probiotics on calf gut health and their potential benefits in promoting healthy digestion and growth.

Understanding Probiotics: Probiotics are live microorganisms, primarily bacteria or yeast, that confer health benefits when consumed in adequate amounts. They work by colonizing the gut and interacting with the existing microbial community, promoting a balanced gut microbiota. Probiotics can help improve nutrient absorption, strengthen the immune system, and inhibit the growth of harmful pathogens.

Enhancing Gut Health in Calves:

  1. Improved Digestion: Probiotics play a significant role in enhancing calf digestion. They help break down complex nutrients, such as fibers and starches, into more digestible forms, improving nutrient availability and absorption. This can lead to increased feed efficiency and nutrient utilization, supporting healthy growth and development.
  2. Microbial Balance: The introduction of probiotics helps establish a favorable microbial balance in the calf’s gut. By populating the gut with beneficial bacteria, probiotics help prevent the overgrowth of harmful pathogens, which can cause digestive disorders and compromise calf health. Maintaining a diverse and balanced gut microbiota is crucial for optimal nutrient absorption and immune function.
  3. Immune System Support: Probiotics have immunomodulatory properties, meaning they can influence the calf’s immune response. By stimulating the production of immune cells and enhancing the gut’s barrier function, probiotics help strengthen the calf’s immune system, making them more resistant to infections and diseases.
  4. Reduction of Diarrhea Incidence: Diarrhea is a common issue in young calves, often caused by bacterial infections. Probiotics have been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of diarrhea in calves. They can inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, and enhance the gut’s immune response, all of which contribute to a healthier gut environment and reduced diarrhea risk.

Implementing Probiotics in Calf Rations: When incorporating probiotics into calf rations, it is essential to select strains that are specifically formulated for calf health. Probiotic products designed for calves often contain strains such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which are beneficial for the young calf gut. These products should be administered according to manufacturer instructions and in consultation with a veterinarian or nutritionist to ensure proper dosage and administration.

Probiotics have emerged as a promising tool for enhancing calf gut health in the dairy industry. By promoting a balanced gut microbiota, improving digestion, supporting the immune system, and reducing the incidence of diarrhea, probiotics offer numerous benefits for calf growth and well-being. As research in this field continues to advance, incorporating probiotics into calf management practices can contribute to healthier calves, improved performance, and long-term success in the dairy industry.

7 Steps to Enhancing Performance and Reducing Feed Costs in Dairy Cattle

Optimizing performance while minimizing feed costs is a key objective for dairy farmers. Efficient utilization of feed resources not only improves profitability but also promotes the overall health and well-being of dairy cattle. This article provides valuable insights and strategies to enhance performance and lower feed costs in dairy cattle management.

Step 1: Balanced Ration and Nutrition

One of the key factors in enhancing performance and reducing feed costs in dairy cattle is ensuring a balanced ration and nutrition. Here are some strategies and considerations to achieve this:

  1. Work with a Professional Nutritionist: Collaborate with a professional nutritionist who has expertise in dairy cattle nutrition. They can assess the specific needs of your herd and formulate a balanced ration accordingly.
  2. Analyze Feed Ingredients: Regularly evaluate the nutrient composition of feed ingredients to ensure accurate ration formulation. Conduct feed tests to determine the quality and nutritional value of the feed.
  3. Optimize Forage Quality: Forages, such as hay and silage, are crucial components of a dairy cow’s diet. Harvest and store forage at the optimal stage of maturity to preserve nutrient content. Proper ensiling techniques, including compacting and sealing the silage, can help maintain quality and reduce spoilage.
  4. Energy and Protein Requirements: Understand the energy and protein requirements of your dairy cattle. Energy-dense feeds like grains can provide the necessary calories, while protein sources such as soybean meal or canola meal can fulfill their protein needs. Balance these components to optimize production and reduce unnecessary costs.
  5. Mineral and Vitamin Supplementation: Dairy cows require essential minerals and vitamins for optimal health and performance. Conduct regular mineral and vitamin analyses to identify deficiencies and provide appropriate supplementation.
  6. Monitor Feed Intake: Keep track of the amount of feed consumed by each cow. This information helps identify any variations or potential issues and allows adjustments to be made to the ration if needed.
  7. Consider By-Products and Alternative Feeds: Incorporating by-products and alternative feeds can be a cost-effective strategy. For example, distillers’ grains, bakery waste, or citrus pulp can be used as alternative feed sources. However, consult with a nutritionist to ensure proper inclusion levels and maintain a balanced diet.
  8. Adjust Rations Based on Production Stage: Dairy cows have different nutritional requirements during various stages of lactation. Adjust the ration accordingly to meet the changing needs of the cows and optimize performance.
  9. Monitor Body Condition Score: Regularly assess the body condition score (BCS) of the cows. A BCS scale helps determine if cows are receiving adequate nutrition. Adjustments can be made to the ration if the BCS indicates over-conditioning or under-conditioning.
  10. Monitor Health and Reproductive Performance: Nutrition plays a crucial role in the overall health and reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Monitor health indicators, such as mastitis incidence or hoof health, and address any issues promptly. Good reproductive performance improves overall herd productivity.

Remember, a well-balanced ration should consider the specific requirements of your dairy cattle, including breed, age, stage of lactation, and production goals. Regularly review and adjust the ration with the guidance of a professional nutritionist to ensure optimal performance and cost-effectiveness.

Step 2: Effective Forage Management

Implementing effective forage management practices can significantly enhance performance and reduce feed costs in dairy cattle. Here are some strategies to consider:

  1. Harvesting at Optimal Maturity: Timing is crucial when it comes to harvesting forages. Harvesting at the optimal stage of maturity ensures maximum nutrient content and digestibility. Forage crops such as alfalfa or grasses should be harvested when they reach the pre-bloom or early-bloom stage.
  2. Proper Forage Storage: Appropriate storage methods are essential to minimize nutrient losses and maintain forage quality. Consider techniques such as bale wrapping, silage storage, or haylage to preserve the nutritional value of the forage.
  3. Silage Management: When ensiling forages, proper management practices are vital. Some key considerations include:
    • Achieving the appropriate moisture content: Forages should have the right moisture content (typically around 60-70%) to facilitate fermentation and prevent spoilage.
    • Ensuring proper compaction: Compact the forage to remove oxygen, which helps create an anaerobic environment for fermentation.
    • Adequate sealing: Ensure airtight sealing of silage pits or bales to prevent spoilage and nutrient losses.
  4. Pasture Management: Utilizing pasture effectively can significantly reduce feed costs. Implement rotational grazing systems, where cows are moved regularly to fresh paddocks. This allows for better forage utilization, regrowth, and reduces the reliance on stored feeds.
  5. Consider Alternative Forage Sources: In addition to traditional forages, consider incorporating alternative forage sources into the diet. This can include cover crops, crop residues, or annual forages. These alternatives can provide additional feed sources and reduce reliance on expensive purchased feeds.
  6. Monitor Forage Quality: Regularly assess the quality of forages through laboratory analysis. This helps in adjusting the ration formulation and identifying any potential deficiencies or imbalances.
  7. Optimize Forage Processing: Proper processing of forages can enhance their digestibility and nutrient availability. Techniques such as chopping, grinding, or pelleting can break down the forage fibers, making them more accessible to the rumen microbes.
  8. Weed Control: Effective weed control in pastures and forage crops is crucial to ensure the quality and palatability of the forages. Weeds can reduce forage yield and compete for nutrients, ultimately impacting animal performance.
  9. Monitor Dry Matter Intake: Keep track of dry matter intake from forages to ensure cows are meeting their nutritional requirements. Monitoring intake helps identify any deficiencies or overconsumption and allows for adjustments to the overall ration.
  10. Regular Forage Testing: Conduct regular forage testing to assess the nutrient composition, including protein, fiber, and energy levels. This information enables accurate ration formulation and reduces the risk of over- or under-supplementation.

By implementing effective forage management practices, dairy farmers can optimize the use of available resources, reduce reliance on costly purchased feeds, and enhance overall performance and profitability in their dairy cattle operations.

Step 3: Feed Evaluation and Testing

Feed evaluation and testing play a crucial role in enhancing performance and reducing feed costs in dairy cattle. Here are some ways in which feed evaluation and testing can be utilized:

  1. Nutrient Analysis: Regularly analyze feed ingredients, including forages, concentrates, and supplements, to determine their nutrient composition. This analysis provides valuable information about the protein, fiber, energy, and mineral content of the feed, allowing for accurate ration formulation.
  2. Ration Formulation: Utilize the results of feed analysis to formulate balanced rations that meet the specific nutritional requirements of dairy cattle. A well-formulated ration optimizes nutrient intake, supports milk production, and minimizes overfeeding or underfeeding, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased costs.
  3. Feed Efficiency: Analyzing feed efficiency metrics, such as feed conversion ratio (FCR) or milk-to-feed ratio, helps assess the effectiveness of the ration. Monitoring these metrics allows for adjustments to the diet to improve feed efficiency and reduce feed costs per unit of milk produced.
  4. Dry Matter Determination: Accurately determining the dry matter content of feed ingredients and total mixed rations (TMR) is essential for precise ration formulation. Variations in moisture content can significantly impact the nutrient composition and, therefore, the cow’s performance.
  5. Feed Quality Control: Regularly testing feed samples for mycotoxins, molds, or other contaminants is essential to ensure feed quality and prevent negative impacts on cow health and performance. Early detection of any issues allows for appropriate actions to be taken, such as sourcing alternative feed sources or implementing mitigation strategies.
  6. Individual Cow Monitoring: Utilize feed testing to assess individual cow performance and health. By monitoring the nutrient intake and nutrient status of each cow, adjustments can be made to the ration or supplementation to address specific needs, optimize production, and reduce unnecessary feed costs.
  7. Dry Cow Rations: Evaluate and adjust dry cow rations to meet the specific needs of cows during the dry period. Providing proper nutrition during this time supports cow health, improves immune function, and sets the stage for successful lactation, ultimately reducing health issues and related costs.
  8. Forage Quality Control: Regularly testing forage samples, including hay, silage, or pasture, helps determine their nutritional value and assess their suitability for inclusion in the ration. This ensures optimal utilization of forages, minimizes nutrient variability, and reduces reliance on purchased feeds.
  9. Feed Ingredient Selection: Use feed evaluation and testing to compare different feed ingredient options based on their nutrient composition and cost. This allows for informed decision-making when selecting cost-effective ingredients without compromising nutritional quality.
  10. Adjusting Rations: Periodically review and adjust rations based on feed testing results and cow performance. By fine-tuning the ration to match the cow’s requirements, feed efficiency can be improved, and unnecessary feed costs can be minimized.

Regular feed evaluation and testing provide critical information for effective ration formulation, feed quality control, and individual cow management. By utilizing these practices, dairy farmers can optimize performance, reduce feed costs, and improve the overall profitability of their operations.

Step 4: Feed Efficiency Measures

Implementing feed efficiency measures is essential for enhancing performance and reducing feed costs in dairy cattle. Here are some strategies to improve feed efficiency:

  1. Consistent Feeding Schedule: Establish a regular feeding schedule and stick to it. Consistency in feeding times promotes optimal rumen function and digestion. Cows develop a routine and are more likely to consume their feed promptly, reducing the risk of overeating or feed wastage.
  2. Total Mixed Ration (TMR) Mixing: Ensure that the TMR is thoroughly mixed to achieve a consistent blend of ingredients. This prevents cows from selectively sorting and consuming only certain components of the ration, which can lead to imbalances in nutrient intake. Consistent particle size and proper mixing techniques help maintain a uniform ration throughout the feeding period.
  3. Feed Bunk Management: Monitor feed bunk management practices to minimize feed spoilage and wastage. Avoid overfilling the feed bunk to prevent feed from going stale or being trampled. Regularly clean the feed bunks to maintain feed freshness and prevent the growth of mold or harmful bacteria.
  4. Feed Bunk Space: Provide sufficient bunk space for all cows to comfortably access their feed. This prevents overcrowding and competition, ensuring that each cow has equal opportunity to consume their allotted feed.
  5. Limit Feeding: Consider implementing controlled or restricted feeding practices under the guidance of a nutritionist. This involves providing cows with a specific amount of feed to meet their nutritional requirements, rather than allowing for ad libitum feeding. Limit feeding can promote better nutrient utilization and reduce feed wastage.
  6. Feed Additives: Explore the use of feed additives that improve nutrient utilization and feed efficiency. Probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes, and direct-fed microbials can enhance rumen fermentation and digestion, resulting in better feed conversion and nutrient absorption.
  7. Water Availability: Ensure that clean, fresh water is readily available to the cows at all times. Ample water intake is crucial for proper rumen function and nutrient absorption. Inadequate water supply can lead to reduced feed intake and lower feed efficiency.
  8. Monitor Cow Health: Regularly assess cow health and address any issues promptly. Health problems, such as mastitis or metabolic disorders, can negatively impact feed intake and utilization. Proper herd health management, including vaccination programs, regular veterinary check-ups, and preventive measures, can minimize health issues and improve feed efficiency.
  9. Monitor Body Condition Score (BCS): Regularly assess the BCS of cows to ensure they are within the target range. Over-conditioned cows have a higher risk of metabolic disorders and reduced feed efficiency. Adjust the ration or management practices to maintain optimal BCS and body condition.
  10. Record Keeping and Analysis: Maintain detailed records of feed consumption, milk production, and cow performance. Analyze the data to identify trends and patterns related to feed efficiency. This allows for targeted adjustments to the ration, management practices, or cow grouping strategies to optimize feed efficiency.

By implementing these feed efficiency measures, dairy farmers can improve nutrient utilization, reduce feed wastage, and ultimately enhance performance while lowering feed costs in their dairy cattle operations. Regular monitoring, record keeping, and collaboration with a nutritionist or dairy consultant are key to effectively implementing and fine-tuning these strategies.

Step 5: Utilize By-Products and Alternative Feeds

Incorporating by-products and alternative feeds into the diet of dairy cattle can be an effective strategy to enhance performance and reduce feed costs. Here are some considerations for utilizing these feed sources:

  1. By-Product Evaluation: Evaluate the nutritional composition and suitability of various by-products from local industries, such as distillers’ grains, bakery waste, or brewer’s grains. Conduct feed analysis to determine their nutrient content and ensure they meet the nutritional requirements of dairy cattle.
  2. Feed Availability and Cost: Assess the availability and cost of by-products and alternative feeds in your area. Consider establishing relationships with local industries to secure a consistent supply of these feed sources at a competitive price.
  3. Feed Quality Control: Implement quality control measures to ensure the consistency and safety of by-products and alternative feeds. Regularly test for contaminants, toxins, or adulterants to maintain feed quality and minimize health risks to the cattle.
  4. Ration Balancing: Work with a nutritionist to accurately balance the ration by incorporating appropriate levels of by-products and alternative feeds. Consider their nutrient composition, energy content, and digestibility when formulating a balanced diet that meets the specific nutritional needs of the dairy cattle.
  5. Energy and Protein Sources: Utilize by-products and alternative feeds as energy and protein sources in the ration. These feed sources can replace more expensive traditional feeds, such as corn or soybean meal, while still providing the necessary nutrients for milk production and growth.
  6. Fiber Sources: Some by-products and alternative feeds, such as wheat bran, beet pulp, or citrus pulp, can be valuable sources of dietary fiber. Including these fiber sources in the ration promotes rumen health and improves digestion, thereby enhancing feed efficiency and reducing the risk of digestive disorders.
  7. Introduce Gradually: When incorporating new by-products or alternative feeds into the diet, introduce them gradually to allow the rumen microbes to adapt. Sudden changes in the diet can disrupt rumen fermentation and potentially lead to digestive upsets. Monitor the cows’ response to the new feed sources and make adjustments as needed.
  8. Feed Storage and Handling: Proper storage and handling practices are essential to maintain the quality and nutritional value of by-products and alternative feeds. Follow recommended storage guidelines to prevent spoilage, mold growth, or nutrient losses. Keep feeds dry, protected from pests, and stored in suitable containers or silos.
  9. Monitor Performance: Regularly monitor the performance of the dairy cattle when incorporating by-products and alternative feeds. Assess milk production, body condition score, and overall health to ensure the new feed sources are positively impacting performance. Make adjustments to the ration if necessary to optimize results.
  10. Economic Evaluation: Conduct economic evaluations to assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating by-products and alternative feeds. Compare the cost per unit of nutrient provided by these feed sources with traditional feeds to determine their value in reducing overall feed costs.

By effectively utilizing by-products and alternative feeds, dairy farmers can diversify their feed sources, reduce reliance on costly traditional feeds, and enhance performance while lowering feed costs in their operations. Collaboration with a nutritionist or dairy consultant is crucial to ensure proper formulation and incorporation of these feed sources into the ration.

Step 6: Optimal Cow Comfort and Health

Optimizing cow comfort and health is essential for enhancing performance and reducing feed costs in dairy cattle. Here are some strategies to achieve optimal cow comfort and health:

  1. Adequate Housing: Provide comfortable housing facilities that protect cows from extreme weather conditions, such as excessive heat, cold, or humidity. Adequate ventilation, proper flooring, and sufficient space for resting and movement are essential for cow comfort.
  2. Clean and Dry Bedding: Ensure clean, dry, and comfortable bedding for cows to lie down and rest. Regularly clean and replace bedding materials to prevent the accumulation of moisture, pathogens, and odors, which can lead to mastitis and other health issues.
  3. Proper Ventilation: Maintain good air quality and ventilation within the barn. Proper airflow helps remove moisture, ammonia, and dust, creating a healthier environment for cows and reducing the risk of respiratory problems.
  4. Freestall Design: Optimize freestall design to provide cows with comfortable resting areas. Ensure adequate stall dimensions, proper slope, and appropriate bedding material. Comfortable stalls encourage cows to lie down for longer periods, improving rumination and nutrient utilization.
  5. Access to Clean Water: Ensure easy access to clean, fresh water at all times. Water availability and quality directly impact feed intake, digestion, and overall cow health. Regularly clean water troughs or bowls to prevent bacterial growth and ensure an adequate water supply.
  6. Nutritional Management: Develop and implement a well-balanced and consistent nutritional program based on the specific needs of the cows. Provide diets that meet the cows’ energy, protein, mineral, and vitamin requirements. Proper nutrition supports optimal milk production, reproductive performance, and overall cow health.
  7. Regular Health Monitoring: Implement a comprehensive health monitoring program in collaboration with a veterinarian. Regularly assess cow health through routine check-ups, vaccinations, and screenings. Early detection and treatment of health issues can prevent costly diseases, reduce treatment expenses, and improve overall cow performance.
  8. Cow Comfort Assessments: Conduct regular assessments of cow comfort and welfare. Monitor behavior, locomotion, and body condition score to identify any discomfort or potential health issues. Make necessary adjustments to the housing, feeding, or management practices based on the assessment findings.
  9. Cow Handling and Stockmanship: Train farm staff on proper cow handling techniques and stockmanship practices. Gentle and low-stress handling minimizes cow stress, improves cow behavior, and enhances overall well-being. Reducing stress levels positively impacts feed intake, digestion, and milk production.
  10. Preventive Health Measures: Implement preventive health measures, such as vaccination programs, parasite control, and biosecurity protocols. Preventing diseases and minimizing the risk of infection reduces the need for costly treatments and supports cow health and performance.

By prioritizing cow comfort and health, dairy farmers can enhance cow productivity, reduce the occurrence of health issues, and minimize feed costs associated with poor performance or disease. Regular assessments, collaboration with experts, and continuous improvement of management practices are key to achieving optimal cow comfort and health.

Step 7: Efficient Reproduction Management

Achieving optimal reproductive performance improves overall herd productivity. Here are some strategies to optimize reproduction management:

  1. Timely Breeding: Implement a well-planned and timely breeding program to ensure cows are bred at the optimal time for conception. Use heat detection methods, such as tail chalk, activity monitors, or timed artificial insemination, to accurately identify cows in heat. Timely breeding improves conception rates, reduces days open, and minimizes the number of non-productive days.
  2. Reproductive Health Monitoring: Regularly monitor the reproductive health of cows through pregnancy diagnosis, uterine health checks, and assessment of reproductive performance indicators. This allows for early detection and treatment of reproductive issues, such as uterine infections or cystic ovaries, minimizing their impact on fertility and reducing associated costs.
  3. Nutrition and Body Condition: Ensure that cows are on an appropriate nutrition program to maintain optimal body condition. Underfeeding or overfeeding can negatively affect reproductive performance. Proper nutrition supports estrus expression, follicular development, and overall reproductive function.
  4. Transition Management: Properly manage the transition period, including the prepartum and postpartum phases, to support reproductive health. Provide a balanced transition diet, minimize stress, and closely monitor cows during this critical period. Effective transition management reduces the risk of metabolic disorders, such as ketosis or displaced abomasum, which can impact reproductive performance.
  5. Heat Stress Management: Implement heat stress management strategies during hot weather to support reproductive performance. Provide shade, proper ventilation, and cooling systems to reduce heat stress and encourage normal estrus behavior. Heat stress can disrupt estrus expression, reduce conception rates, and increase embryonic loss.
  6. Reproductive Records and Data Analysis: Maintain detailed records of reproductive events, including breeding dates, pregnancy diagnoses, calving dates, and reproductive treatments. Analyze this data to identify trends, identify potential issues, and make data-driven decisions to improve reproductive performance. Monitoring reproductive metrics, such as days open, services per conception, and calving interval, helps track progress and identify areas for improvement.
  7. Genetic Selection: Utilize genetic selection tools, such as genomics and genetic evaluations, to improve reproductive performance. Select sires with favorable reproductive traits, such as fertility and calving ease, to enhance the reproductive potential of the herd. Utilizing sexed semen or targeted breeding strategies can also optimize genetic progress and reproductive efficiency.
  8. Reproductive Health Protocols: Implement reproductive health protocols, including routine reproductive exams, synchronization programs, and strategic use of reproductive technologies. Work with a veterinarian to develop customized protocols based on the specific needs and goals of the herd. Consistent and strategic use of reproductive technologies can improve the overall reproductive efficiency of the herd.
  9. Culling and Replacement Strategies: Develop culling and replacement strategies based on reproductive performance. Identify and cull cows with chronic reproductive issues or low fertility to minimize non-productive days and associated feed costs. Proper replacement heifer management ensures a steady supply of high-quality replacements, reducing reliance on external sources and improving overall herd productivity.
  10. Collaboration with Experts: Work closely with a veterinarian and reproductive specialists to optimize reproductive management. Regular consultations, fertility exams, and guidance from experts can help identify potential issues, implement effective strategies, and continuously improve reproductive performance.

Efficient reproduction management enhances the overall performance of the herd, reduces the number of non-productive days, and minimizes feed costs associated with extended calving intervals or poor fertility. Regular monitoring, data analysis, collaboration with experts, and the use of modern reproductive technologies are key to achieving optimal reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Boosting performance and reducing feed costs in dairy cattle necessitates a holistic approach that encompasses balanced nutrition, efficient forage management, accurate ration formulation, feed efficiency measures, and optimal cow health management. By implementing these strategies and best practices, dairy farmers can enhance profitability, animal welfare, and overall farm sustainability. Remember to seek guidance from experts in nutrition and dairy management to tailor these strategies to your

Heat Stress and its Impact on High-Producing Lactating Cows

Heat stress is a significant challenge for dairy farmers, particularly when it comes to high-producing lactating cows. Dairy cows are susceptible to heat stress due to their high metabolic rate and limited heat dissipation mechanisms. Heat stress negatively affects the cow’s health, well-being, and milk production. This article explores the impact of heat stress on high-producing lactating cows and provides insights into management strategies to mitigate its effects.

Understanding Heat Stress in Dairy Cows

  1. Heat stress is a major concern for dairy farmers worldwide, as it significantly affects the health, productivity, and overall welfare of dairy cows. Dairy cows are particularly susceptible to heat stress due to their limited ability to dissipate excess heat. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of heat stress in dairy cows, including its causes, effects, and effective management strategies.Causes of Heat Stress:
    Several factors contribute to the development of heat stress in dairy cows. The primary causes include:

    1.  High Ambient Temperature: When ambient temperature rises above the cow’s thermoneutral zone (usually around 68°F to 77°F or 20°C to 25°C), heat stress becomes more likely.
    2. Humidity: High humidity reduces the cow’s ability to dissipate heat through evaporation, exacerbating heat stress.
    3. Solar Radiation: Direct exposure to intense sunlight increases heat load on cows, especially those without access to shade.
    4. Ventilation and Airflow: Inadequate ventilation and poor airflow in barns or housing facilities limit the cow’s ability to cool down.
    5. Cow-Related Factors: Breed, coat color, body condition, previous exposure to heat stress, and individual variations influence a cow’s susceptibility to heat stress.
  1. Effects of Heat Stress on Dairy Cows:
    Heat stress negatively impacts dairy cows in various ways:

    1. Decreased Feed Intake: Heat-stressed cows often reduce their dry matter intake, leading to insufficient nutrient intake and reduced milk production.
    2. Altered Milk Production: Heat stress causes a decline in milk yield, along with changes in milk composition, such as reduced butterfat content and protein content.
    3. Reproductive Challenges: Heat stress impairs reproductive performance, resulting in decreased estrus expression, reduced conception rates, and extended calving intervals.
    4. Metabolic Disorders: Heat-stressed cows are prone to metabolic disorders, including ketosis, fatty liver, and acidosis, due to reduced feed intake and increased energy expenditure for thermoregulation.
    5. Increased Disease Susceptibility: Heat stress weakens the cow’s immune system, making them more vulnerable to various diseases, such as mastitis, metritis, and respiratory infections.
  1. Management Strategies for Heat Stress:
    To mitigate the effects of heat stress on dairy cows, the following management strategies can be implemented:

    1. Providing Adequate Shade: Access to shaded areas or shelter can help cows reduce direct exposure to sunlight and minimize heat load.
    2. Improving Ventilation: Proper ventilation systems, including fans, vents, and airflow management, promote air exchange and dissipate excess heat.
    3. Water Availability: Ensure a constant supply of cool, clean water to encourage hydration and aid in thermoregulation.
    4. Nutritional Considerations: Adjusting diets to include ingredients with higher fiber content, reducing heat increment, and providing nutrient supplements can help maintain feed intake and minimize metabolic disorders.
    5. Heat Abatement Techniques: Implementing cooling mechanisms such as sprinklers, misters, and fans can help lower the cow’s body temperature and reduce heat stress.
    6. Heat Stress Monitoring: Regularly monitoring temperature and humidity levels, as well as cow behavior and vital signs, can aid in early detection of heat stress and timely intervention.

Heat stress poses significant challenges to dairy cows, affecting their health, milk production, and reproductive performance. Understanding the causes, effects, and management strategies for heat stress is crucial for dairy farmers to ensure the well-being and productivity of their herds. By implementing appropriate measures, such as providing shade, optimizing ventilation, maintaining water availability, and considering nutritional interventions, farmers

Impact on Milk Production

Heat stress has a profound effect on milk production in dairy cows, posing significant challenges for dairy farmers. As temperature and humidity rise, cows experience physiological changes that disrupt their normal metabolic processes, leading to reduced milk yield and compromised milk quality. This article explores the causes, effects, and mitigation strategies related to heat-induced impacts on milk production in dairy cows.

  1. Causes of Heat-Induced Milk Production Decline:a. Heat Load: High ambient temperature and humidity increase the cow’s heat load, surpassing its ability to dissipate heat efficiently. This leads to elevated body temperatures, negatively affecting milk production.b. Reduced Feed Intake: Heat-stressed cows exhibit decreased appetite and reduced dry matter intake. This insufficient nutrient intake results in reduced milk production.

    c. Alterations in Rumination Behavior: Heat stress disrupts normal rumination patterns, reducing the cow’s ability to effectively digest and utilize nutrients from the diet.

    d. Hormonal Changes: Heat stress interferes with hormonal regulation, particularly affecting prolactin, a hormone essential for milk production. Reduced prolactin levels lead to decreased milk synthesis.

  2. Effects of Heat Stress on Milk Production:a. Decreased Milk Yield: Heat stress has a direct negative impact on milk yield in dairy cows. Studies have shown that milk production can decline by 10% to 35% during heat stress episodes.b. Altered Milk Composition: Heat-stressed cows may experience changes in milk composition, such as reduced butterfat content and protein content. This alters the nutritional value and marketability of the milk.

    c. Delayed Lactation Peak: Heat stress can delay the lactation peak, resulting in a longer period before cows reach their maximum milk production potential. This affects overall milk production efficiency.

    d. Reduced Milk Quality: Heat stress can compromise milk quality by increasing somatic cell counts and the risk of mastitis, leading to decreased milk shelf life and quality.

  3. Mitigation Strategies:a. Adequate Cooling Systems: Providing shade, fans, and sprinkler/mister systems in barns or housing facilities helps reduce heat load and maintain a cooler environment for cows.b. Optimal Ventilation: Improving ventilation by installing adequate vents and ensuring proper airflow within the barns enhances heat dissipation and reduces heat stress.

    c. Access to Cool Water: Dairy cows should have continuous access to cool, clean water to stay hydrated and aid in thermoregulation.

    d. Nutritional Management: Adjusting the diet to include ingredients with higher fiber content and reducing heat increment can help maintain feed intake during heat stress. Supplementing with additives, such as electrolytes or antioxidants, may also support cow health and milk production.

    e. Heat Stress Alleviation Measures: Implementing heat abatement techniques like misters, fans, and cooling pads can directly reduce body temperature and alleviate heat stress in cows.

    f. Timely Milking and Cooling: Ensuring prompt milking and proper milk cooling practices minimize the risk of bacterial growth and maintain milk quality.

Heat stress significantly impacts milk production in dairy cows, resulting in decreased milk yield and compromised milk quality. Understanding the causes and effects of heat stress on milk production is crucial for dairy farmers to implement effective mitigation strategies. By providing appropriate cooling systems, optimizing ventilation, ensuring access to cool water, managing nutrition, and implementing heat stress alleviation measures, farmers can mitigate the negative impacts of heat stress and maintain optimal milk production in their dairy herds.

Reproductive Challenges

Heat stress poses significant reproductive challenges for dairy cows, affecting their fertility, conception rates, and overall reproductive performance. High ambient temperatures and humidity disrupt the cow’s estrus cycle, ovulation, and embryo development, leading to reduced reproductive efficiency. This article explores the specific reproductive challenges faced by dairy cows due to heat stress and provides management strategies to mitigate its negative effects.

  1. Disrupted Estrus Expression:a. Reduced Estrus Detection: Heat-stressed cows may exhibit fewer or less obvious signs of estrus, making it challenging for farmers to detect and accurately time breeding.b. Shortened Estrus Duration: Heat stress can shorten the duration of estrus, reducing the window for successful artificial insemination (AI) or natural mating.

    c. Inconsistent Estrus Patterns: Heat stress may cause irregular or prolonged intervals between consecutive estrus cycles, further complicating breeding management.

  2. Decreased Conception Rates:a. Reduced Ovulation Rates: Heat stress disrupts the maturation and release of viable oocytes, resulting in reduced ovulation rates and decreased chances of fertilization.b. Poor Embryo Development: Elevated body temperature during heat stress negatively affects embryo development and viability, leading to decreased conception rates.

    c. Altered Hormonal Regulation: Heat stress interferes with hormonal signaling pathways involved in reproductive processes, such as the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge required for ovulation.

  3. Extended Calving Intervals:a. Delayed Time to First Service: Heat stress can prolong the time it takes for cows to resume normal reproductive cycles after calving, resulting in delayed first service and extended calving intervals.b. Reduced Pregnancy Rates: Decreased conception rates due to heat stress contribute to longer intervals between successful pregnancies, impacting the overall reproductive efficiency of the herd.
  4. Increased Pregnancy Losses:a. Early Embryonic Mortality: Heat stress increases the incidence of early embryonic mortality, leading to higher rates of pregnancy loss during the critical early stages of pregnancy.b. Heat-Related Stress on Pregnant Cows: Heat stress during late gestation negatively affects fetal development, increasing the risk of stillbirths and neonatal mortality.
  5. Management Strategies for Mitigating Reproductive Challenges:a. Heat Abatement Measures: Providing shaded areas, fans, misters, and sprinkler systems in barns and pastures helps reduce heat stress and create a more conducive environment for reproductive processes.b. Timely Breeding and AI Synchronization: Accurate estrus detection, prompt breeding, and AI synchronization programs help maximize the chances of successful conception within the narrowed windows of heat stress-affected estrus.

    c. Reproductive Hormonal Manipulation: Implementing strategies such as timed AI protocols and hormone synchronization programs can help optimize breeding efficiency during heat stress periods.

    d. Optimal Nutrition: Maintaining a well-balanced diet that meets the cow’s nutritional requirements supports reproductive health and improves conception rates in heat-stressed cows.

    e. Monitoring and Health Management: Regular monitoring of cow body condition scores, health status, and reproductive performance allows for early detection and intervention in cases of fertility-related issues.

Heat stress presents significant reproductive challenges for dairy cows, including disrupted estrus expression, decreased conception rates, extended calving intervals, and increased pregnancy losses. Implementing effective management strategies, such as heat abatement measures, timely breeding, reproductive hormonal manipulation, optimal nutrition, and diligent monitoring, can help mitigate the negative effects of heat stress on cow reproduction. By addressing these challenges, dairy farmers can enhance the reproductive efficiency of their herds and maintain sustainable breeding programs even under heat

Metabolic and Health Disorders

Heat stress significantly impacts the metabolic and health status of dairy cows, making them susceptible to various disorders. High ambient temperatures and humidity compromise the cow’s thermoregulatory mechanisms, leading to imbalances in energy metabolism, nutrient utilization, and immune function. This article highlights the metabolic and health disorders commonly observed in heat-stressed dairy cows and provides strategies to mitigate their occurrence.

  1. Negative Energy Balance:a. Reduced Feed Intake: Heat-stressed cows often exhibit decreased dry matter intake due to decreased appetite and increased heat increment associated with digestion.b. Increased Energy Expenditure: The cow’s energy expenditure rises as it attempts to dissipate excess heat, leading to an energy deficit and negative energy balance.

    c. Ketosis and Fatty Liver: Negative energy balance predisposes cows to ketosis, a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood ketone levels. It can progress to fatty liver syndrome, impairing liver function and overall cow health.

  2. Metabolic Acidosis:a. Reduced Rumination: Heat stress affects rumination behavior, resulting in decreased chewing time and compromised buffering capacity of saliva. This can lead to metabolic acidosis, characterized by a lower rumen pH and disrupted rumen microbial activity.b. Impaired Ruminal Fermentation: Acidotic conditions in the rumen negatively impact fiber digestion, volatile fatty acid production, and nutrient absorption, further exacerbating metabolic acidosis.
  3. Increased Susceptibility to Infectious Diseases:a. Mastitis: Heat stress weakens the cow’s immune system, making them more susceptible to mastitis, a bacterial infection of the mammary gland. Elevated temperature and humidity provide a favorable environment for bacterial growth.b. Metritis: Heat-stressed cows are prone to metritis, an inflammation of the uterus post-calving, due to compromised immune function and impaired uterine involution.

    c. Respiratory Illnesses: Heat stress compromises the respiratory system, making cows more vulnerable to respiratory diseases, including pneumonia and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections.

  4. Dehydration and Electrolyte Imbalance:a. Reduced Water Intake: Heat-stressed cows may decrease water consumption, leading to dehydration and imbalances in electrolyte levels, particularly sodium, potassium, and chloride.b. Impaired Thermoregulation: Dehydration affects the cow’s ability to dissipate heat through evaporative cooling, further exacerbating heat stress.
  5. Mitigation Strategies:a. Shade and Cooling Systems: Providing shaded areas and implementing cooling mechanisms like fans, misters, and sprinklers in barns alleviate heat stress and reduce the incidence of metabolic disorders.b. Optimal Ventilation: Ensuring proper airflow and ventilation in housing facilities enhances heat dissipation and reduces the risk of respiratory illnesses.

    c. Nutritional Management: Adjusting diets to maintain adequate nutrient intake and incorporating feed additives like buffers or yeast products can help mitigate metabolic disorders and support immune function.

    d. Water Availability: Offering clean, cool water at all times promotes hydration and helps prevent dehydration and electrolyte imbalances.

    e. Timely Disease Detection and Treatment: Regular monitoring of cow health, including early detection and prompt treatment of mastitis, metritis, and respiratory diseases, minimizes their impact on overall cow well-being.

Heat stress predisposes dairy cows to metabolic and health disorders, including negative energy balance, metabolic acidosis, increased susceptibility to infectious diseases, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances. Implementing appropriate mitigation strategies, such as providing shade, optimizing ventilation, maintaining proper nutrition and hydration, and promptly addressing health issues, is crucial for minimizing the negative impacts of.

Mitigation Strategies

Heat stress poses a significant challenge for dairy farmers, impacting the health, productivity, and overall welfare of their cows. As temperatures rise, it is crucial to implement effective mitigation strategies to alleviate heat stress and create a comfortable environment for dairy cows. This article highlights various strategies that farmers can employ to mitigate the effects of heat stress on their dairy herds.

  1. Providing Adequate Shade and Shelter:a. Natural Shade: Ensuring access to shaded areas, such as trees or structures, allows cows to seek relief from direct sunlight and reduces heat load.b. Artificial Shade: Installing shade structures, such as shade cloths or roofs, in open areas and holding pens provides additional protection from intense sunlight.

    c. Adequate Shelter: Properly designed and ventilated barns or housing facilities offer a cooler and more comfortable environment during periods of heat stress.

  2. Optimizing Ventilation and Airflow:a. Natural Ventilation: Designing barns with proper orientation and utilizing open sidewalls or windows facilitates airflow and improves natural ventilation.b. Mechanical Ventilation: Installing fans, vents, and circulation systems helps enhance airflow and remove hot air from the barn, promoting heat dissipation.

    c. Airflow Management: Ensuring unobstructed airflow within the barn and proper positioning of fans and vents optimize ventilation efficiency.

  3. Water Availability and Cooling Mechanisms:a. Constant Water Supply: Providing a continuous supply of clean and cool water allows cows to hydrate and regulate their body temperature through drinking and wetting their bodies.b. Misters and Sprinklers: Installing misting or sprinkler systems in holding areas and shade structures creates evaporative cooling, reducing the cow’s body temperature.

    c. Cooling Pads and Soaking Systems: Using cooling pads or wetting systems on concrete floors or in holding areas provides additional cooling for cows.

  4. Nutritional Management:a. Balanced Rations: Adjusting the cow’s diet to meet nutritional requirements during heat stress helps maintain proper energy levels and supports overall cow health.b. Feed Additives: Incorporating additives such as electrolytes, buffers, or yeast products in the diet can assist in maintaining hydration, electrolyte balance, and rumen health.

    c. Feeding Times: Offering feed during cooler times of the day, such as early morning or evening, reduces the cow’s heat increment associated with digestion.

  5. Heat Stress Monitoring and Cow Management:a. Temperature and Humidity Monitoring: Regularly monitoring ambient temperature and humidity levels provides valuable information for timely intervention.b. Cow Behavior Observation: Observing cow behavior, such as increased respiration rates, reduced feed intake, or seeking shade excessively, helps identify heat-stressed individuals.

    c. Cow Handling and Herd Management: Implementing low-stress handling practices, proper sorting, and providing adequate space for cows reduces heat stress and promotes cow comfort.

    d. Breeding and Milking Time Management: Scheduling breeding and milking activities during cooler periods of the day minimizes heat stress and ensures optimal reproductive and milk production efficiency.

Mitigating heat stress in dairy cows is crucial for maintaining their welfare, productivity, and overall health. By implementing strategies such as providing shade and shelter, optimizing ventilation, ensuring water availability and cooling mechanisms, managing nutrition, and monitoring cow behavior and environmental conditions, dairy farmers can reduce the impact of heat stress on their herds. These proactive measures help create a comfortable environment, minimize heat-related health issues, and ensure sustainable dairy production even in challenging climatic conditions.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Heat stress poses a significant challenge to high-producing lactating cows, affecting their milk production, reproductive performance, and overall health. Dairy farmers must implement appropriate management strategies to mitigate the impact of heat stress. By providing optimal environmental conditions, nutritional support, and heat abatement measures, farmers can minimize the negative consequences of heat stress, ensuring the well-being and productivity of their high-producing lactating cows.

Optimizing Feed Factors to Maximize Milk Income in Dairy Farming

Maximizing milk income is a primary goal for dairy farmers, and achieving this requires a comprehensive understanding of the role that feed factors play in milk production. Feed constitutes a significant portion of the input costs in dairy farming, making it crucial to optimize feed factors to enhance milk production and profitability. This article discusses key feed factors that can be leveraged to maximize milk income in dairy farming.

  1. Feed Quality and Nutrient Composition:

    a. Forage Quality: High-quality forages, such as alfalfa and grasses, provide essential nutrients and support milk production. Ensuring proper harvesting, storage, and preservation techniques maintain forage quality and optimize nutrient availability.

    b. Concentrate Feeds: Balancing concentrate feeds, such as grains and protein supplements, with forages is essential to meet the nutritional needs of cows. Formulating rations based on accurate nutrient analysis and considering the cow’s production stage improves milk yield and efficiency.

    c. Feed Additives: Incorporating feed additives, such as rumen modifiers, enzymes, and direct-fed microbials, can enhance nutrient utilization, digestion, and rumen health, leading to increased milk production and feed efficiency.

  2. Feed Management and Delivery:

    a. Consistency and Regularity: Maintaining consistent feeding schedules and delivering feeds at regular intervals help establish a stable rumen environment and promote optimal rumen fermentation for improved milk production.

    b. TMR Mixing and Delivery: Proper Total Mixed Ration (TMR) mixing ensures uniform nutrient distribution, preventing sorting and selective feeding. Using well-maintained feeding equipment and techniques guarantees accurate TMR delivery to each cow, supporting consistent milk production.

    c. Feed Bunk Space: Sufficient feed bunk space allows all cows to access the TMR simultaneously, reducing competition and stress during feeding. This ensures adequate nutrient intake for optimal milk production.

  3. Feed Efficiency and Nutrient Utilization:

    a. Balancing Rations: Formulating rations that meet the cow’s nutrient requirements while minimizing excesses or deficiencies optimizes feed efficiency and nutrient utilization.

    b. Feed Processing: Proper processing of feeds, such as grinding grains and chopping forages, improves digestibility and enhances nutrient availability, resulting in increased milk production.

    c. Effective Fiber Content: Maintaining an appropriate level of effective fiber in the ration promotes rumen health and optimal fiber digestion, maximizing nutrient utilization and milk production.

  4. Water Availability and Quality:

    a. Adequate Water Supply: Providing clean and fresh water at all times ensures proper hydration, rumen function, and milk production. Cows should have easy access to water sources within their housing and grazing areas.

    b. Water Quality: Monitoring water quality regularly, including pH, mineral content, and microbial contamination, helps maintain cow health and supports efficient nutrient utilization.

  5. Monitoring and Record-Keeping:

    a. Production Monitoring: Regularly monitoring milk production, milk components, and cow performance metrics enables timely identification of any deviations or issues, allowing for prompt intervention and adjustments to maximize milk income.

    b. Feed Efficiency Tracking: Keeping records of feed consumption, ration formulations, and milk production allows for accurate assessment of feed efficiency and identification of areas for improvement.

Maximizing milk income in dairy farming relies on optimizing feed factors that impact milk production and profitability. Ensuring feed quality, nutrient composition, and balancing rations based on cow requirements, along with effective feed management practices, enhances milk yield and efficiency. Attention to water availability and quality, as well as diligent monitoring and record-keeping, further support optimal milk income. By focusing on these key feed factors, dairy farmers can improve their overall profitability and sustainability in the industry.

Strategies for Increasing Nitrogen Efficiency in Dairy Herds

Nitrogen efficiency is a critical aspect of dairy farming, as it directly impacts the environmental sustainability of the operation and can influence overall profitability. Efficient utilization of dietary nitrogen by dairy cows minimizes nitrogen excretion and reduces the potential for environmental pollution. This article explores various strategies that can be implemented to increase nitrogen efficiency in dairy herds, benefiting both the farm and the environment.

  1. Precise Nutrient Management:

    a. Balanced Rations: Formulating diets that meet the cow’s nutrient requirements optimizes nitrogen utilization. This includes accurately estimating the cow’s protein needs and avoiding excessive protein levels, which can result in increased nitrogen excretion.

    b. Rumen-Protected Protein: Utilizing rumen-protected protein sources, such as bypass proteins, ensures that more dietary protein reaches the small intestine for absorption, reducing nitrogen waste in the rumen.

    c. Amino Acid Balancing: Formulating diets based on essential amino acid requirements rather than crude protein levels allows for more precise nitrogen utilization, optimizing milk protein synthesis and reducing excess nitrogen excretion.

  2. Effective Forage Management:

    a. High-Quality Forages: Providing high-quality forages that are properly harvested, stored, and preserved improves digestibility and reduces the need for additional protein supplementation, minimizing nitrogen waste.

    b. Fiber Digestion: Maintaining adequate fiber content in the ration promotes rumen health and fiber digestion, enhancing nitrogen utilization and reducing the risk of excess nitrogen excretion.

    c. Silage Additives: Incorporating silage additives, such as microbial inoculants or enzymes, can improve forage fermentation and fiber digestibility, increasing nitrogen efficiency.

  3. Optimal Feeding Management:

    a. Feeding Frequency and Consistency: Establishing regular feeding schedules and avoiding abrupt dietary changes help maintain a stable rumen environment, optimizing nutrient digestion and reducing nitrogen loss.

    b. Feed Bunk Management: Ensuring sufficient feed bunk space allows all cows to access the ration simultaneously, minimizing competition and reducing the risk of overconsumption and excess nitrogen excretion.

    c. Feed Waste Reduction: Implementing strategies to minimize feed waste, such as proper feed storage, precise feed delivery, and minimizing refusals, helps avoid unnecessary nutrient losses, including nitrogen.

  4. Manure Management:

    a. Nutrient Management Planning: Developing a comprehensive nutrient management plan allows for efficient utilization of manure as a nutrient source, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers and minimizing nitrogen losses from manure.

    b. Proper Manure Handling: Implementing best management practices for manure storage, handling, and application, such as using covered storage structures and precision application techniques, reduces nitrogen losses and improves nutrient utilization.

    c. Composting and Anaerobic Digestion: Utilizing composting or anaerobic digestion systems for manure treatment can enhance nitrogen retention and reduce ammonia emissions, improving nitrogen efficiency.

  5. Regular Monitoring and Evaluation:

    a. Performance Tracking: Monitoring milk production, milk components, and cow performance metrics allows for assessing the effectiveness of nitrogen management strategies and identifying areas for improvement.

    b. Nutrient Analysis: Regularly analyzing feed ingredients, forages, and manure for nutrient content helps ensure accurate nutrient balancing and efficient nitrogen utilization.

Increasing nitrogen efficiency in dairy herds is vital for both environmental sustainability and farm profitability. By implementing precise nutrient management practices, optimizing forage utilization, improving feeding management, and adopting proper manure management strategies, dairy farmers can reduce nitrogen losses and enhance nitrogen utilization by cows. Regular monitoring and evaluation of performance metrics enable continuous improvement in nitrogen efficiency, ensuring a more sustainable and economically viable dairy operation. By adopting these strategies, dairy farmers can contribute to a greener and more efficient dairy industry.

Bupleurum Extract: A Promising Solution to Relieve Heat Stress in Dairy Cows

Heat stress has adverse effects on the health and productivity of dairy cows, necessitating effective strategies to alleviate its impact. Recent research has shown that bupleurum extract, derived from the Bupleurum plant, exhibits promising potential in relieving heat stress in dairy cows. This article explores the benefits of bupleurum extract and its application as a natural remedy to mitigate the effects of heat stress in dairy cows.

  1. Natural Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties:

    a. Anti-inflammatory Effects: Bupleurum extract possesses anti-inflammatory properties that help alleviate the inflammatory response triggered by heat stress, reducing tissue damage and improving overall cow health.

    b. Antioxidant Effects: Heat stress induces oxidative stress in dairy cows, leading to cellular damage. Bupleurum extract acts as an antioxidant, scavenging free radicals and reducing oxidative damage.

  2. Modulation of Heat Shock Proteins:

    a. Heat Shock Protein (HSP) Regulation: Bupleurum extract has been found to modulate the expression of heat shock proteins in dairy cows. HSPs play a vital role in protecting cells from heat stress-induced damage.

    b. Cellular Protection: By upregulating the expression of HSPs, bupleurum extract enhances the cellular defense mechanisms, promoting cell survival and minimizing the detrimental effects of heat stress.

  3. Improved Immune Function:

    a. Enhanced Immune Response: Heat stress compromises the immune system of dairy cows, making them more susceptible to infections and diseases. Bupleurum extract has shown immunomodulatory effects, boosting immune function and resistance against pathogens.

    b. Reduced Mastitis Incidence: Heat stress increases the risk of mastitis in dairy cows. Bupleurum extract’s immunomodulatory properties help strengthen the cow’s immune response, reducing the incidence of mastitis.

  4. Alleviation of Gastrointestinal Disorders:

    a. Improved Gut Health: Heat stress can disrupt the microbial balance in the cow’s gut, leading to digestive disorders. Bupleurum extract has been shown to promote gut health by modulating gut microbiota and improving nutrient absorption.

    b. Enhanced Intestinal Barrier Function: Bupleurum extract supports the integrity of the intestinal barrier, reducing the risk of endotoxemia and associated health issues.

  5. Mitigation of Metabolic Disorders:

    a. Regulation of Metabolic Pathways: Heat stress can disrupt metabolic pathways, leading to negative energy balance and metabolic disorders. Bupleurum extract has demonstrated the ability to modulate key metabolic enzymes, helping maintain metabolic homeostasis.

    b. Improved Liver Function: Heat stress can impair liver function in dairy cows. Bupleurum extract has hepatoprotective properties, supporting liver health and enhancing metabolic processes.

Bupleurum extract offers a promising natural solution for relieving heat stress in dairy cows. Its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and gut health-promoting properties make it a valuable tool in mitigating the negative effects of heat stress. By incorporating bupleurum extract into the management practices of dairy farms, farmers can enhance cow health, immune function, and overall productivity in the face of challenging heat stress conditions. Further research and field trials are warranted to fully understand the optimal dosage, timing, and long-term effects of bupleurum extract in dairy cow management.

Modifying genes to increase dairy cows’ resistance to heat

Average summer temperatures and the frequency of ‘severe heat days’ are rising in several regions of the globe.

Dairy animals on pasture are hence more susceptible to heat stress. Smaller cow breeds, such as the Guernsey, outperform larger ones, such as the Holstein, although coat type and colour also have a factor.

So far, there are two ways to modify the coat via gene editing to boost heat tolerance. First, consider the’slick coat,’ which consists of short, silky, and occasionally even shiny hair.
The characteristic of a slick coat

Holsteins with a smooth coat have superior heat tolerance, as seen by lower internal (vaginal) temperatures and respiration rates. Researchers from Mississippi State University and the University of Puerto Rico in Mayagüez released a report in 2020 concluding that under the hot and humid circumstances of Puerto Rico, Holstein cows with the slick gene outperform those without it in terms of reproduction.

When compared to qualities including several genes, the smooth trait involves a single dominant gene, making it ideal for gene editing. According to Dr Alison Van Eenennaam, a scientist at the University of California, Davis, gene editing entails directing enzyme’scissors’ to make a targeted, particular cut in a DNA sequence. “Depending on how that’s repaired, you can have inactivation of the gene located at that point on the strand, or a difference in how the gene functions,” she adds. “DNA from that organism, another of its species, or another species may also be introduced.” Van Eenennaam employed gene editing to make a bull calf with more than 50% male progeny.

The’slick coat gene’ was introduced into freshly fertilised eggs from cows lacking the gene by geneticists at the Roslin Institute (University of Edinburgh in Scotland). Modified embryos were implanted in surrogate mother cows, and calves with glossy coats (but no other alterations) were born.

The research believes that applying this gene change has a high potential for increasing cow herds that are better acclimated to heat stress across the globe, and that it would be particularly beneficial to small-holder farmers in tropical nations. They are currently collaborating with colleagues at Kenya’s International Livestock Research Institute on local cow breeds.

According to team member Dr. Appolinaire Djikeng, “we can do small edits in the genome that very quickly accomplish improvements that would otherwise take 20 generations.” “I am very excited about the potential application of this technology in Kenya, the United Kingdom, and other parts of the world.”
Another clever gene editing experiment

Meanwhile, a company in the United States called Recombinetics has utilised gene editing to create two beef calves with the smooth coat feature. The US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) issued its first verdict on gene-edited cattle pertaining to this gene modification in March 2022, calling it a ‘enforcement discretion determination.’ This implies that the FDA judged that the ‘risk’ connected with these calves and their gene edit was minimal, therefore they are exempt from the implementation of current US gene editing restrictions. The FDA now defines any genetic mutation to an animal by gene editing as a novel animal medication, and so US drug regulation standards apply. In the future, gene-edited animals in the United States may be governed by the US Department of Agriculture rather than the FDA, which now controls gene edits to plants that include the inactivation of a gene or any gene that may have been introduced via normal breeding.

Van Eenennaam speculates that “the FDA could consider a tiered system with risk levels.” And it will be shortly. We must keep in mind that postponing gene editing research and commercialization comes at a high cost.”

Other nations, like Brazil, Australia, and Argentina, see gene editing as regular breeding when a gene is knocked out and no new DNA is introduced.

Dr. Tad Sonstegard, President and CEO of Acceligen (owned by Recombinetics), said that the company would continue to work towards the commercialization of cows with the slick gene modification in the United States.
More heat with a black coat

Changes in coat colour are another method gene editing is being utilised to minimise heat stress in cattle. Unlike other light-colored dairy breeds such as Jersey, the Holstein cow has a black and white coat, with some of the breed having a lot of black – and dark colours absorb substantially more UV radiation than lighter.

A team of geneticists in New Zealand has previously done this with Holsteins, utilising a gene modification to eliminate the black coat hairs. The AgResearch, Ruakura Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Massey University Manawatu, and the Livestock Improvement Corporation are all part of the team.

They explain in their research that they induced a deletion in Holsteins in “the pre-melanosomal protein 17 gene, which has been proposed as the causative variant for the semi-dominant colour dilution phenotype observed in Galloway and Highland cattle.” Calves born from cells with homozygous edits have a unique grey and white coat pattern.”

“While we have demonstrated it for a dairy breed, the strategy could easily be applied to beef breeds such as Black Angus,” they say. Overall, our research demonstrated and confirmed genome editing as a viable new strategy for rapidly adapting cattle to changing environmental circumstances.”
Other genes associated with heat

Meanwhile, experts at Agriculture Victoria in the Australian state of Victoria have found many genes highly connected with heat tolerance.

Since 2017, Dairy Australia and the country’s dairy industry have made genomic breeding values for heat tolerance accessible to dairy producers via DataGene, an independent entity administered by Dairy Australia and the dairy industry.

Milk income-maximizing feed variables

Regardless of the feeding strategy utilised, efficient herd feeding is a critical aspect affecting dairy farm profitability. According to Dairy Australia, increasing the supply of home-grown feed is critical.

Research from throughout the globe, including Australia, has consistently shown a correlation between greater amounts of home-grown feed and better profitability. This is true independent of the farm’s feeding strategy or degree of intensity.

Dairy Australia underlines that, in the great majority of circumstances, locally produced feed is less expensive than imported or purchased feed. Maximising the production and exploitation of this resource is thus crucial to the sustainability of agricultural companies. Improving the resilience and profitability of agricultural systems requires increasing the production of home-grown feed.

Dairy Australia has produced a data sheet outlining the five most frequent feeding techniques used on dairy farms in Australia. Despite the fact that farms tend to get more intense from system 1 to system 5, there is a common misconception that home-grown feed is less important in more intensive systems.

“This is incorrect,” Dairy Australia points out, “as most successful examples of system 5 – where cows are fully housed – still grow a large percentage of their feed as home-grown feed, often as high-quality conserved forage such as maize silage or similar.”
Supplements are quite lucrative.

According to Dairy Australia, no system is superior to others, and all systems may be successful. Choosing the correct system for your farm will be primarily determined by the resources available and your risk tolerance.

On Australian dairy farms, home-grown feed seldom meets all of the feed gaps, thus supplements are employed. If utilised appropriately and effectively, they may be quite rewarding.

Dairy Australia has also prepared a ‘Designing balanced milker diets’ information sheet, which details how to optimise milk revenue minus feed costs in the herd and aids in the design of high-quality, nutritionally balanced milker diets.

Dairy Australia emphasises the need of farmers calculating cows’ daily food requirements. Cows need nutrient-dense diets for maintenance, pregnancy, exercise, growth, reproduction, and milk production. Although water, calories, protein, and fibre are the most important elements to consider when designing a diet, minerals and vitamins should not be overlooked.

Dairy Australia advises dairy farmers to consider several factors when selecting feeds to use in milker diets, including nutrient specifications, price, consistency of supply and quality, expected losses during storage (shrinkage), mixing and feed-out, increased capital requirements, extra labour required to handle, and other costs.
Farmers must determine the daily nutritional needs of their cows. Ronald Hissink is the photographer.
Farmers must determine the daily nutritional needs of their cows. Ronald Hissink is the photographer.
Milk earnings minus feed costs

The nutritional properties of feeds may vary greatly. The best approach to determine a feed’s nutritional properties is to get a feed test analysis. “High forage quality is paramount when designing diets for milking dairy cows,” states Dairy Australia. “Forage quality has a significant influence on feed intake because it is defined by its percentage of neutral detergent fibre [NDF] and NDF digestibility values.” The reaction to concentrates and diets is driven by forage quality.”

When developing a diet, farmers should consider three factors:

NDF digestibility and forage NDF percentage
The digestibility of starch in the rumen
Protein content and rumen degradability

According to Dairy Australia, an excess of nutrients may harm cow health, diminish feed conversion efficiency (kg of milk per kg of feed), and reduce milk revenue minus feed cost. “On the other hand, severe underfeeding will have an impact on performance as well as cow health and fertility.” It may take many cycles to balance the major components of a diet and discover a diet that is within the cow’s hunger limit and provides the highest potential milk revenue minus feed expense.”

Milk revenue less feed costs is a valuable indicator, according to Dairy Australia, especially when there is little or no pasture available. “It tells you how much of your milk income remains after you’ve paid for feed.” This sum must include running expenses such as herd, shed, labour, and administrative expenditures, as well as your finance and capital costs, including drawings.”
Efficiency evaluation

Farmers that feed a substantial quantity of purchased feed must obtain a high daily milk output per cow in order to get a higher milk revenue minus feed expense. The greater the milk output, the lower the proportion of unproductive money, that is, money spent on cow upkeep rather than milk production and income generation.

According to Dairy Australia, the concepts of marginal vs average milk output response are particularly important to grasp when administering supplements to optimise profit. The incremental increase in milk supply produced from an additional kilogramme of supplement provided is known as marginal milk response. The increase in milk supply averaged across all kilogrammes of supplement provided is referred to as the average milk response.

Dairy Australia believes it is critical to monitor the efficiency with which feed is transformed into milk since feed costs such a substantial amount of variable and total expenses on a dairy farm. Feed conversion efficiency (FCE) is a major indicator of a dairy farm’s feeding system performance, influencing feed cost per unit of milk and milk operational profit.

FCE is another major component that influences a farm’s greenhouse gas emissions. “FCE should always be used in conjunction with other farm physical and financial performance measures such as annual milk operating profit and return on assets,” Dairy Australia advises.

FCE is defined as the quantity of milk produced per kilogramme of feed fed to the herd. FCE for the milking herd may be calculated yearly or periodically throughout each year. “FCE is a useful form of measurement for monitoring the efficiency of a feeding programme,” according to Dairy Australia. “However, it should not be associated with farm profit too closely because it does not account for the cost of feed consumed by the herd.” FCE is useful in determining the quality of feed ingested by the herd, especially the forage component of the diet, since greater FCE is linked with better quality diets.”

Using selective breeding to reduce the risk of retained placenta in dairy cows

Retained placenta is a common reproductive condition in dairy cows, described as the inability to release foetal membranes within 24 hours following parturition, which increases the risk of uterine infections and infertility.

Due to increased culling risk, poorer reproductive performance, extended calving interval, higher veterinary expenditures, and decreased milk supply, retained placenta causes an estimated financial loss of US$ 150 to US$ 386 per cow every lactation. Previously, the emphasis was mostly on production and conformation qualities, which resulted in diminishing trends in health, reproduction, and lifespan features.

Although retained placenta has a modest heritability of 0.01 to 0.10, long-term selection on this reproductive abnormality may enhance resistance and boost herd profitability.

Risk hazards unique to cows

A lack of immunological function is one of the probable risk factors for retained placenta, since cows with retained foetal membranes have decreased neutrophil activity, which may affect their capacity to evacuate the placenta following parturition. Because of a shortage of dietary carotene, retained placenta is more common in the winter than in other seasons. Furthermore, shorter gestation durations and increasing parity are linked to a greater prevalence of retained placenta.

Retained placenta resistance

The anticipated resistance of dairy cow progeny to retained placenta in a herd with typical management circumstances is represented by resistance to retained placenta predicted transmission ability. The resistance rate is calculated by subtracting the incidence rate from 100. The average resistance rate in US Holsteins is 96%. Daughters of a Holstein bull with a predicted resistance to retained placenta of +2% are expected to have an average resistance rate to retained placenta of 98%, while daughters of a Holstein bull with a predicted resistance to retained placenta of -2% are expected to have an average resistance to retained placenta of 94%.

Furthermore, daughters from the bull with a projected transmitting capacity of -2% are likely to have three times the number of instances of retained placenta as daughters from the bull with a predicted transmitting ability of +2%.

Advantages of Choosing

Because retained placenta is a frequent risk factor for later metritis, improving resistance to retained placenta enhances resistance to metritis. Furthermore, retained placenta keeps the cervix open, which acts as a physical barrier to infection in unaffected animals. Retained placenta postpones uterine involution, lochia evacuation, and endometrial regeneration, and raises the risk of ovarian cystic degeneration, chronic endometritis, and pyometra.

However, the phenotypic occurrence of retained placenta reduces the afflicted dairy cow’s future milk output, and there is an antagonistic genetic association between retained placenta features and milk yield as well. Thus, improving resistance to retained placenta not only decreases the direct and indirect expenses associated with this condition, but it also improves dairy cow health, welfare, and reproductive performance.

Other reproductive problems

The discovery of a genetic link between retained placenta and other reproductive problems simplifies breeding for enhanced resistance to retained placenta. According to a research published in 2022 by Mahnani and colleagues, the estimated genetic connections with retained placenta were -0.04 for twinning, 0.32 for stillbirth, and 0.34 for dystocia. These findings suggest that twinning reduces the likelihood of retained placenta, and that selecting against retained placenta may indirectly select against dystocia and stillbirth.

Furthermore, modest genetic associations between retained placenta and dystocia and stillbirth show that cows that are vulnerable or resistant to retained placenta are genetically more susceptible or resistant to dystocia and stillbirth. The estimated genetic associations between retained placenta and production parameters such as milk, fat, and protein yields varied from -0.12 to -0.29 in this research, indicating that cows with greater output during early lactation are less likely to acquire retained placenta. The researchers also discovered a low negative genetic link (-0.09) between retained placenta and success of first insemination, but a significant positive genetic correlation (0.25) between retained placenta and days open, days from calving to first service, and number of inseminations per conception.

These findings indicate that dairy cows with retained placentas had longer days open, days from calving to first service, a higher number of inseminations per conception, and worse first insemination success. As a result, genetic selection against retained placenta enhances reproductive features.

Genetic regulation

When combined with appropriate management practises, improving disease resistant features via direct genetic selection gives a compelling potential for dairy farmers to better reduce disease incidence and enhance profitability. A helpful on-farm management tool is genomic prediction for health features such as resistance to retained placenta gained at a young age.

Genetically better heifers and cows may be bred with sexed sperm, whereas genetically inferior animals can be sold for meat early or bred with beef sperm. It is advised to assess the accuracy of genetic calculations in predicting the performance of each dairy cow. Furthermore, information gathered from commercial dairy herds may be utilised to correctly predict resistance features in dairy cows.
Conclusion

Retained placenta is a costly condition that impacts the health, welfare, and profitability of 7.8% of US dairy cows. To enhance dairy cow health, welfare, and performance, the genetic study of retained placenta and its relationship with other reproductive diseases, fertility, and production attributes must be prioritised.

More research is needed to examine health features and their relationship to retained placenta in order to properly classify dairy cows based on herd profitability.

How to to Boost Performance and Lower Feed Costs

Feed expenses will remain the most expensive item. Dr. Mike Hutjens, retired professor of animal science at the University of Illinois-Champaign-Urbana, points out that feed expenditures are the most expensive aspect of farming.

“With feed accounting for half of total farm expenses, keeping them under control is critical,” he explains. “The only reason to raise livestock is to increase the return on crops raised on the farm.”

Gary Sipiorski, an independent farm company finance expert, believes that understanding your expenses is critical. According to him, feed prices vary from 20% to 45% of total revenue, depending on how much feed you generate yourself.

“If you buy all of your feed, your feed costs will be around 50% of your milk check,” Sipiorski explains. “Feed is the most expensive cost for a dairy, and each farm must evaluate it individually based on variables such as needs and forage quality.”

Jim Salfer, a University of Minnesota Extension dairy specialist, gives some best practises to assist farmers reduce feed expenditures. In most herds, these guidelines may be adopted with minimum impact on performance.

  1. Reduce Waste and Shrink – A 100-cow dairy may save $58,400 in one year by switching from high to low shrink. Dairies often experience 30% shrinkage on forages with bunkers and piles, and 10% shrinkage on concentrates in commodity sheds. “This is the most significant and simple way to reduce feed costs,” he adds, adding that fodder held in bunkers or heaps is an insidious cost since you don’t pay for it.
  2. Work with your nutritionist to maximise the benefit of homegrown feeds if you raise the majority of your own feeds, he advises. “If you feed purchased dry hay, consider reducing the amount and increasing the corn silage in the diet if you have an adequate supply.” “Even if purchased protein costs more, the total diet cost is likely to be lower,” Salfer notes.
  3. Optimise Bunk Refusals — “Many have successfully reduced bunk refusals to 2% or less for lactating cows with excellent bunk reading and feed management.” “In a freestall barn, feed can be fed to replacement heifers or the low group,” he explains. As the number of refusals decreases, Salfer emphasises the need of high-quality meals, regular pushups, feed-maintenance methods, and consistent feeding hours.
  4. Avoid Nutrient Overfeeding —All kinds of animals should be fed at indicated nutrient needs, but no more. Heifer diets that are much beyond national research council standards, in my view, are a waste of nutrients. “Research shows that feeding at recommended levels is adequate for excellent growth,” adds Salfer. “Review additives and determine if they are cost-effective in the diet.”

 

The dos and don’ts of ketosis for dairy cows

Ketosis is a frequent transition condition that affects 5-80% of dairy farms. Ketosis is characterised as a high concentration of ketone substances in all bodily fluids, such as acetone, acetoacetate, and beta-hydroxybutyrate. Anorexia, reduced milk supply, loss of body condition, hard, dry stools, and rarely neurologic symptoms are clinical indicators of ketosis. This article discusses the dos and don’ts of ketosis management.

Other transition cow illnesses like as metritis, retained placenta, and left displaced abomasum have been linked to ketosis. Monitoring the herd’s degree of ketosis may therefore help to avert these economically important illnesses.
Ketosis monitoring in the dairy herd

It is critical to test enough animals in the herd to monitor the fresh cow incidence of ketosis. A reasonable approach would be to test 12-15 cows. If more than 10% of the cows have ketone levels higher than the established limit of 14.4 ml/dL, the group is said to be in ketosis.
Sufficient bed space and stocking density

Negative energy balance around the time of calving causes adipose mobilisation and ketone body formation because to increased energy demand from milking production and reduced dry matter intake. As a result, it is critical to address the conditions that contribute to decreased dry matter intake, such as bunk space and stocking density.

The minimal sleeping space per head is 24 inches, while the optimum bunk space per head is about 30 inches. The recommended bedded pack area per head is between 120 and 150 square feet (11-14 square metres), while free stall stocking density must stay at one cow per stall.
Pay attention to the dry time.

The dry phase in dairy production systems lasts 60 days and includes both far-off and close-up periods. The pregnant cow is given a break from milking before to the next calving during the dry season to recover body reserves and rebuild milk-secreting tissue after months of milking.

According to research, failing to provide a dry time for a cow lowers milk production in the next lactation by 25-30% and increases the risk of metabolic disorders such as ketosis and milk fever, as well as problems such as displaced abomasum. Furthermore, appropriate dry period management requires accurate record-keeping.
Collaboration with veterinarians and dietitians is essential.

Veterinarians and nutritionists work with dairy producers to detect and manage potential causes of ketosis. Veterinary treatment and preventative procedures must be considered. Subclinical ketosis, for example, may be treated with 300 mL of propylene glycol orally once every day for 3-5 days.
Body condition evaluation

Body condition rating is a useful instrument that has a substantial influence on transition performance and ketosis prevalence. The optimal post-calving body condition score varies from 2.75 to 3 out of 5.

During the transition phase, low and high body condition scores increase the risk of ketosis and have a negative influence on reproductive performance. As a result, it is important to frequently assess the body condition score during dry-off, moving to close-up, calving, and moving out of the fresh pen.
Cows and heifers should not be mixed.

Co-mingling heifers and older cows increases heifer stress, reduces dry matter intake, and contributes to a negative energy balance. Furthermore, in dairy herds, there is a social order, and transferring a cow into a new enclosure with animals it is unfamiliar with might cause further stress. in a result, it is advised that the cows be moved in a group so that they may be with other familiar cows.
Do not overfeed dairy cows.

Each stage of dairy production necessitates a different approach to feeding. Because the cow isn’t being milked during the dry time, too much energy in diet must be avoided. Furthermore, concentrates and grains promote fat accumulation and predispose the animal to difficult births, ketosis, udder edoema, downer cow syndrome, and abomasum displacement.

Dairy cows need a sufficient supply of calories, proteins, minerals, and vitamins. Furthermore, trace minerals promote a stronger immunological response after calving and the transition period, enhancing a cow’s inflammatory response and lowering the incidence and severity of ketosis.

Reducing ruminant heat stress

Since the previous decade, the ruminant market has been quickly evolving, offering both possibilities and problems for those involved in animal production. Heat stress in ruminants, in particular, is a significant concern in our profession due to its deleterious influence on performance.
Heat stress has serious repercussions.

According to Kemin study, the following negative impacts of heat stress have been demonstrated:

  • This has a negative influence on the animal’s usual physiological behaviour.
  • Reduced dry matter intake, which has a direct influence on dairy cow production.
  • Dry matter intake should be reduced by 20 to 25%.
  • Milk yield declines by 40 to 45%.
  • Reduced fibre digestive efficiency has an effect on ruminal acidosis.
  • Oxidative stress alters endocrine function and nutrition absorption.

Reduced reproductive efficiency.

Kemin argues that dietary solutions that improve the negative protein and energy balance associated with heat stress are crucial in helping cows to retain milk output and health. To reduce the impacts of heat stress, we must first enhance our general health and then implement a healthy dietary approach.
Heat stress mitigation strategies

There are two critical paths to reducing the consequences of heat stress. It is critical to ensure:

– Improved overall health

– Appropriate nutritional strategy

Both of these channels are critical not just during heat stress, but also throughout the animal’s life. Here’s an overview of both ways, along with some solutions:
1) Improved overall health

Improving dry matter intake to preserve and boost production under heat stress may be accomplished via two strategies: choline supplementation and dietary cation-anion balance (DCAB):

Choline. Choline nutrition has lately gained a lot of interest owing to its significance in boosting liver function. Aside from increased production, Choline’s significance in enhancing dry matter intake, immunity, and health makes a compelling case for improved bioavailable Choline supplies. We have demonstrated that choline changes the plasma NEFA concentration, enhancing hepatic fat export. This reduces hepatic fat content and, as a consequence, improves liver function, resulting in appropriate dry matter intake.

Arshad et al. (2020) did a meta-analysis of the effects of rumen protected choline supplementation on the performance and health of parous dairy cows. They discovered that eating 200 g dry matter prepartum and 500 g postpartum resulted in better body weight and body condition score.

Dietary cation-anion balance (DCAB). In animals, dietary cation-anion balancing (DCAB) increases dry matter intake. Rumination activity diminishes when plasma calcium levels fall during hypocalcemia. Rumination is distinguished by a complicated sequence of muscular contractions that transport a bolus of ingesta to the mouth for further mastication before swallowing it again. In pre-calving cows exposed to heat stress, DCAB may overcome impaired rumination induced by hypocalcemia.

Santos et al. (2019) just published a meta-analysis based on 42 studies, 134 treatments, and 1803 cows. The statistical models’ resultant equations suggested that decreasing the Dietary Cation-Anion Difference (DCAD) from +200 to 100 mEq/kg would raise blood total calcium on the day of calving from 1.86 to 2.04 0.05 mM, DMI postpartum 1.0 kg/d, and milk output 1.7 kg/d in parous cows.
2) Appropriate Nutritional Strategy: Diets include rumen-protected amino acids (AA), methionine, and lysine.

Effective nutritional management and adequate ration formulation are critical for improving health and productivity, and thereby alleviating the harmful impacts of heat stress in dairy cows. Heat stress entirely alters rumen and small intestine functions, impacting digestibility and feed efficiency, as well as metabolic responses to lower intake and a decrease in endogenous heat generated to sustain gluconeogenesis.

As a result, precision feeding with Amino Acid nutrition is critical to mitigating the effects of heat stress on animals. Formulating low-rumen degradable protein diets, as well as meeting methionine (Met) and lysine (Lys) requirements, lowers circulating insulin levels and improves both protein efficiency and the metabolic status of heat-stressed cows due to better AA utilisation.

The only viable approach to accomplish the above is to improve protein quality supply, increase the levels of the first two limiting AA, Met, and Lys in diets, and maintain an acceptable energy level.

One thing is certain: regardless of production level, temperature-humidity index, or diet components, we cannot meet Met and Lys demands without employing both rumen-protected Met and Lys.

Amino acids have been shown to provide the following advantages. They:

Increase the production and utilisation of glucose.
Reduce the negative energy balance (together with the negative protein balance) caused by heat stress.
Reduce oxidative stress while preserving immunological function.
Increase antioxidant capacity while preserving immunological function.
Assist us in developing low heat increment diets.
Increase your consumption of dry matter and energy-corrected milk under heat stress.
Restore the intestinal barrier when it has been damaged.

Conclusion

Two new meta-analyses of rumen-protected Choline and DCAB supplementation reveal that Choline and DCAB considerably enhance dry matter intake, which is crucial in improving farm profitability.

In addition, combining AA with other ingredients is one of the most cost-effective strategies to enhance health and performance at all times, particularly under heat stress.

Breeding more efficient cows to save food

Thousands of nursing Holstein cows in multiple states are supplying continuous data that is being evaluated to enhance breeding for improved feed efficiency in the US and worldwide as you read this.

Higher feed efficiency, which implies that less feed is required to produce the same quantity of milk, is clearly a win for everyone, not just because it reduces environmental effect, but also because it helps farmers cut feed costs.
Unrivalled quantity of cow performance data gathered

Breeding for improved feed efficiency (achieving valid ‘genomic breeding values for this characteristic) has been limited up to this point by a lack of sufficient, trustworthy data. That is why, around 5 years ago, a big research centred at multiple US colleges was launched. Not only is the quantity of cows unusual, but this research is also notable for collecting vast volumes of cow performance data of various sorts using automated sensors.

The project is being funded by the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR), a government-affiliated organisation that creates public-private partnerships to fund research projects that help solve critical food and agriculture challenges, complementing the USDA’s research agenda. In this example, FFAR provided a $1 million grant to Michigan State University, which was matched by a $1 million grant from the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.

Dr. Michael VandeHaar of Michigan State University is conducting the project, which includes a core group of six geneticists and four nutritionists from the University of Wisconsin, Iowa State University, the University of Florida, and the USDA Animal Genomics Improvement Laboratory.

The initiative will result in more accurate genomic feed efficiency forecasts, as well as the ultimate creation of a feed intake index that employs sensors to estimate feed intake on individual cows. The researchers will also look at whether genetic predictions of feed efficiency may help reduce methane emissions.
Sensors on the ears – a feed intake indicator that predicts feed intake on individual cows using sensors. Dr. James Koltes, Iowa State University.
Sensors on the ears – a feed intake indicator that predicts feed intake on individual cows using sensors. Dr. James Koltes, Iowa State University.
Data gathering

Because the emphasis is on feed efficiency, the data collected includes not only individual cow feed intake and milk output, but also body weight – and from sensors, body temperature, eating behaviour, and movement data. Milk from the research cows will also be tested.

“We currently have data on feed intake, body weight, and production from 8200 cows, milk spectra from 3250 cows, body temperature from 1200 cows, and activity (locomotion and feeding behaviour) from 1800 cows,” VandeHaar explains.

The team also fulfilled its objective of genotyping all new cows last year. They also measured methane emissions from 147 cows, which was three times the intended amount.

The diets of the research cows are normal commercial diets that differ amongst participating farms. All of the cows are at least two years old.

Although the research is proceeding well, there are some difficulties. The availability of cows to use in the study, for example, has been a challenge. Furthermore, VandeHaar claims that gathering quality data on feed consumption of individual nursing cows and integrating it to the database is costly and time-consuming.
Supplementing current dairy cow data

This initiative expands on a database built more than a decade ago by Michigan State scientists, who discovered in a USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture study that breeding for more feed-efficient cows may save the US dairy industry $540 million USD per year with no decrease in milk supply.

“We developed a database of 3950 US cows in that project,” VandeHaar continues. “Those cows had their feed intake, body weight, and production data recorded for at least 28 days and, in most cases, 42 days.” They were all genotyped as well.”
Individual cow feed intake and milk production are being collected, as well as body weight – and from sensors (here around the neck), body temperature, eating behaviour, and movement data. Dr. James Koltes, Iowa State University.
Individual cow feed intake and milk production are being collected, as well as body weight – and from sensors (here around the neck), body temperature, eating behaviour, and movement data. Dr. James Koltes, Iowa State University.
Sensor use in cow feed intake

VandeHaar and his colleagues are now assessing the efficacy of sensors for forecasting feed intake in their present study.

“Our goal was to have sensor data from a subset of the 3600 cows, mostly from Michigan State, Iowa State, and the University of Florida,” he says, “and we are currently at 1800.” To present, sensors and spectral data seem promise for forecasting certain changes in Residual Feed Intake (RFI, a measure of feed efficiency) among cows within a farm, but establishing equations that operate across farms will be tough.”

The team has previously released assessments of sensor data from individual stations and has begun studying data from several sensor stations. They have already begun examining sensor phenotype combinations for forecasting feed intake, although much more work need to be done.

Indeed, it is too early to tell what can be achieved on this front at this time.

“We can already use a cow’s body weight, body condition score, parity, and milk production to predict if she eats more or less than the other cows in her feeding group,” VandeHaar says. “Then, if we know the group’s average intake, we can predict her intake.” However, we know that certain cows consume more or less than anticipated, as predicted by RFI. Our objective is that data from sensors (particularly activity, feeding time, and rumination time) and milk spectra data may provide further information that can assist us in predicting RFI. But we don’t know how well that will work at the moment.”

VandeHaar observes that if it proves to be effective, organisations that sell sensors would most likely utilise this method of forecasting RFI using their own sensors.
Developing mathematical equations for farm management software

“Perhaps we’ll be able to develop equations for farm management software that combine activity and rumination time with milk spectra data, genomics data, automated body weight and body condition data, milk production, and group intakes from TMR feeding systems to predict intake of individual cows,” he adds. These might be utilised to estimate feed efficiency and aid in breeding and culling choices.”

Looking forward, he and his colleagues intend to publish equations to forecast feed intake of individual cows in group-fed circumstances in 2024 or 2025, which would be utilised in culling and breeding choices.
Feed Efficiency – Feed Savings

Because of the project’s first-year findings, the trait known as ‘Feed Saved’ (a feed efficiency trait based on RFI and body size) was added in the Net Merit Index in 2021, one of 39 qualities that have appeared in the Index since that time for Holsteins.

(The Net Merit Index is a 1994 US breeding index that forecasts net profit throughout the lifespan of the typical dairy cow or bull’s daughter. VandeHaar and his colleagues say that it’s frequently used to select sires for use on commercial farms across the US, and that these rankings will have a long-term impact on Holstein genetics throughout the globe.)
Increasing the number of novel RFI phenotypes

Last year, the researchers measured RFI phenotypes to match with genotypes of unique cows for 1170 cows, bringing the project’s total of novel RFI phenotypes to 4200.

However, the team also observed last year that the new Feed Saved trait’s dependability is lower than expected. “As a result,” they write, “we intend to continue phenotyping as many cows as possible in year 5 (2023) to maximise the effectiveness of the Feed Saved trait.”

Robotic milking is changing the dairy industry in Texas.

Technology is essential on Scott Vieth’s dairy farm in Windthorst.

A robot milks his cows, ushering in a new era in dairy production for this third-generation dairy farmer.

Vieth decided to transition to robotic milkers in 2022. His dairy is one of just six robotic dairies in the state, with the majority of them located in Windthorst.

“I began using robots because my old parlour was becoming outdated.” “I wanted to be more innovative and use the technology that is currently being used in the dairy industry,” Vieth said. “Genetics are important to me, and I wanted to maximise the genetic potential of my cows.” “The robots provide me with the best option for that.”

Vieth’s cows were producing 80 pounds of energy-corrected milk per day in his previous parlour, but since switching to robotic milkers, they are producing 95 pounds of energy-corrected milk per day.

Veith deployed nine Lely A5 robots under a climate-controlled tunnel vent barn of 100,000 square feet. During the sweltering Texas summers, the climate-controlled barn provides a cooler habitat for the cows.

The robots also collect data from the cows’ rumination collars, which they wear on a regular basis. The collars are necessary for robotic milkers because they communicate with the robot about the cow that is being milked. The robot scans the cow’s collar and gives the farmer with information about the cow, such as heat detection, animal health, and how much milk the cow is making, similar to a Fit-Bit.

“The robotic milker reads the cows’ collars as they come in to be milked, and if a cow has been in there for less than four hours, it automatically kicks them out because it is too soon for the cow to be milked again,” Vieth said. “What drives the cows to the robots are feed pellets that I refer to as cow candy.”

The number of pellets the cow is permitted to eat is determined by the amount of milk the cow produces. For this reason, the cows like being in the robot.”

The robotic milkers operate 24 hours a day, enabling the cows to come and go as they want. Every cow is milked at least twice a day, and perhaps up to five times a day if the animal desires.

Each robot can manage 60 cows, allowing Vieth to expand his farm from 450 to 550 with one less staff.

Vieth’s farm has become more efficient because to technology and his willingness to adapt.

“I believe people hear machines or robots and believe there is a schism between the person and the animal.” There isn’t one. It is providing the greatest care for the animals,” Vieth said. “The cows adore the robots because they never have to worry about their milk.” If they come in three or four times a day, their bags are not as agitated as they would be if you milked twice a day in a regular parlour.”

When the cow enters the robotic milker, their collar is scanned, and the milking procedure starts.

The quantity of grain supplied to the cow is dropped by the robot. Before milking, the cow’s teats are cleansed with a brush and disinfectant.

Before the robot attaches to the cow’s teats and starts milking, a laser scans the positioning of the teats.

After milking, the teats are sprayed with an orange dye that protects the teats.

The cow is returned to the herd, and the next cow arrives.

According to Vieth, there are often two to three cows waiting to enter the robotic milker.

After the cows are milked, the liquid is cooled to 35 degrees in the milk tank. The faster the milk cools, the longer its shelf life.

After a day, the milk is delivered to Daisy for use in sour cream before being supplied to a big restaurant chain.

Vieth’s cows now produce 5,500 litres of milk every day.

The robotic milkers have increased Vieth’s output and allowed him to maximise the genetic potential of each cow. According to Vieth, his father was well-known for his farm’s genetics and was a major dairy farmer in Texas and the nation.

He aspires to maintain the same reputation.

“I think the biggest benefit of this type of technology is that sometimes there is human error, and the robot eliminates that,” Vieth said. “At any time of day, I can go to my computer or check the app on my phone to see if a cow is sick or has any problems.”

Vieth’s schedule may now be more flexible, allowing him to spend more time with his family.

The dairy business has long been a focal point in the Windthorst community. There were formerly 100 dairies in the Windthorst and Scotland region, but that number has since dropped.

“It’s been a big part of this community, and it’s been sad to see some of the farms go over the years,” he says. “The dairy industry is extremely competitive.” You will be left behind if you do not keep up with the times and technology.”

Vieth also has a Juno, which is similar to a Roomba for dairy cows and pushes the feed up six times a day. As the cows pick through their grain, the Juno moves along the rows, pushing the meal closer to the animals so they can continue eating.

After being milked, the cows even have waterbeds to rest on.

Vieth’s dairy is a perfect illustration of the dairy industry’s continual innovation. This vital area of Texas agriculture relies heavily on cow comfort, animal health and nutrition, efficiency, and sustainability.

And it allows him to continue on his family’s dairy farming history.

Professional Opinions on Dairy Cow Chewing

Explained are the effects of forage qualities and feed-bunk management on cow health and production.

In Applied Animal Science, a fresh viewpoint and commentary evaluates previous evidence on how fibre content and particle size of feed impact eating, rumination, and productive response in dairy cows. Previous research has shown that recumbent rumination is the most effective since it increases saliva output and is helpful to the cow’s general health. Furthermore, longer recumbent rumination time has been associated to higher fat and protein content in milk. This article recommends forage chop length to balance feeding and recumbent rumination time in order to optimise cow calorie intake, health, and production.

“In a dairy cow’s ideal environment, 80% or more of daily rumination should occur while lying down,” stated main scientist R. J. Grant, PhD, of the William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute. “Recumbent rumination results in a healthier rumen pH, greater DMI, and milk with higher milk fat and protein content.”

Cows frequently crush feed to a relatively common particle size before consuming, even though the total mixed ration (TMR) has a broad variety of particle sizes, according to research. Larger particles need more chewing, although this does not always imply longer rumination durations. “Dairy managers, nutritionists, and crop personnel must all consider the time it takes a cow to ingest forage in her TMR and understand that eating, resting, and ruminating behaviours are biologically linked, and our nutritional and management systems must not unlink them,” Grant said. “Forage fibre within the TMR must be optimised for efficient consumption, and cow comfort must be optimised for the dairy cow to effectively process the swallowed feed via recumbent rumination.”

“This article provides well-founded perspectives and commentary about factors influencing dairy cattle chewing behaviour,” said David Beede, PhD, editor in chief of Applied Animal Science. The essay, written by two well-known and experienced researchers and practitioners, offers practical advice for integrating ideas and information regarding forage maturity, fibre degradability, particle size, fragility, and moisture content.”

Beede has observed that forage fibre qualities interact with feed bunk management to influence correct balance in order to optimise feeding time, rumination, and resting activity. “Recommendations (e.g., for theoretical length of cut and ration particle size distribution) emerge from these concepts to optimise lactational performance.”

The authors stated that by following the guidelines for forage chop length and TMR particle distributions, cows would be able to obtain the most nutritious value from their forages.

“Time spent eating at the feed bunk can be considered an integral component of forage quality,” Grant said. “Lower quality forage is less fermentable and requires more time to digest.” Both have the potential to decrease energy use, as well as health and productivity.”

The authors proposed that the length of cut for forages be changed depending on fibre degradability, fragility, and moisture content for crops such as maize silage based on the reviewed study. “As forages mature, their degradability decreases, and they become less fragile,” Grant stated, “they should be chopped shorter to ensure optimal eating and ruminating responses.” Similarly, young or more delicate forages should be chopped for a longer period of time.”

6 tips to integrate beef embryos into your dairy

Full-blooded beef calves from HerdFlex® beef embryos provide dairies with greater opportunities to meet market demands for high-quality beef, especially when farms follow six keys to success.

The market for full beef calves from dairy farms has steadily increased in recent years, offering farmers a more profitable option than the traditional dairy-beef crossbred or straight-bred dairy calf markets.

Driving this trend are:

  • Rising demand for high-quality beef
  • Advances in genetics allowing dairy farmers to produce calves that meet demands for beef production and marketing
  • Historically low beef cow inventory

“Beef embryos have huge potential to positively change the economics of a dairy farm by increasing calf value, maximizing return on investment and offering a consistent profit stream in addition to milk production,” says Brady Hicks, Simplot Animal Science manager. “However, adopting this reproductive tool oftentimes requires a shift in mindset, employee resources and animal marketing.”

Use these six considerations to help smooth the way for adopting a beef in dairy program.

1. Use embryos strategically.

Embryos fit well in a strategic breeding program. On average, you can expect to achieve pregnancy rates similar to artificial insemination (A.I.), and sometimes even better. As with A.I., conception and loss rates can vary by farm and production or management systems.

Dairies adopting HerdFlex® beef embryos report:

  • Conception rates similar to those for the herd’s A.I. performance
  • Higher conception rates during the heat of summer
  • Summer embryo conception rates for cows and heifers may increase as much as 15% above a herd’s AI performance[1]

Heat-stressed cows often show an improvement in pregnancy rate with embryos over A.I. because the implanted embryo circumvents fertility-related challenges and starts with the placement of an already viable embryo.

2. Choose recipients carefully.

Select the correct recipients to increase success. Selecting only first-, second- or third-lactation cows with no more than three services is recommended. Maintain a mandatory 70-day waiting period for dairy cows. Heifers are slightly better recipients than cows. Cows should be in adequate body condition; those with histories of reproductive problems or infertility are not good candidates for use as embryo transfer recipients. Anestrus cows result in much lower conception rates following synchronization.

3. Invest in training.

Embryo transfer is an exacting procedure, so proper technician training and continuing education are essential. A combination of classroom sessions and hands-on training produces the best results.

Embryo transfer can be a more time-consuming process than insemination. Successful programs incorporate embryo transfer as part of their overall dairy management system to help avoid disruption to cows’ and people’s routines.

4. Choose sires to manage calving ease.

Sire calving ease must be monitored and selected for when making all mating decisions, including the use of embryos.

You can and should analyze embryo sire selection before implantation. Proper pre-fresh cow management can help overcome concerns about calf size at birth. Dairies incorporating beef embryos correctly into their programs achieve birthweights similar to those of dairy breeds.

5. Follow accurate animal ID practices.

Traceability back to the farm gate and early health and nutrition are important distinctions for these calves. These benefits are expected, valued and rewarded by the beef marketing chain.

Dairies are strongly encouraged to manage these full beef calves the same way they do replacement females, using health protocols and managing procedures that are already in place. No additional time or effort is necessary to manage beef calves. Simply identify, feed and care for these calves as you would dairy replacement animals.

6. Become a price maker, not a price taker.

Carefully consider marketing options and develop a strategic plan to ensure the best sale price for your calves.

For example, local partnerships with restaurants or locker beef to end consumers could be a marketing pathway as these cattle possess high genetics and desired carcass/marbling traits. Marketing day-old calves, weanlings or feeders are further options to consider. Retaining ownership or entering into a marketing agreement with a cattle feeder are additional routes to explore that can lead to larger profits.

Dairies may receive a significant premium for full beef calves versus straight-bred dairy calves. However, these rewards are the result of deliberate marketing plans and the development of trusted relationships within the value chain. Ultimately, the right marketing plan is critical to getting the most out of your beef embryo investment.

To learn more about incorporating beef embryos into your dairy’s breeding program, visit HerdFlex.com.

The J.R. Simplot Company, a privately held agribusiness firm headquartered in Boise, Idaho, has an integrated portfolio that includes phosphate mining, fertilizer manufacturing, farming, ranching and cattle production, food processing, food brands, and other enterprises related to agriculture. Simplot’s major operations are located in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Australia, South America and China, with products marketed in more than 60 countries worldwide. For more information, visit simplot.com.

Three ways to tackle inaccurate dairy data

What’s the big deal if a data point is off here and there? Or a couple of cows are in the wrong pen? Or you miss a milk weight or two?
 
“It is a really big deal,” says Ron Dehli, Nedap technical business development manager, “because everything circles back to accurate data. If the wrong cow is identified at the wrong time, you could inadvertently sort a cow for breeding that’s on the do not breed list. Or perform a mastitis intervention on a cow needing treatment for something else.” 
 
Herd management systems gather information from the animal and give you an active solution based on that intelligence. However, if input data are inaccurate, the action item will be too.
 
Here are three things you can do to increase animal identification (ID) accuracy and data precision on your dairy.
 
1.   Know system capabilities and component placement
 
Data accuracy depends on consistent, accurate, timely information for each correctly identified animal from select points throughout the dairy. Having the right tools in place to accurately gather information is crucial to ensure you have the best input data from which to make decisions.   
 
For example, a transponder tag with a large read range combined with properly placed antennae offers highly accurate animal identification. Larger transponder tags housed on neck collars help increase tag read range and additional data points such as rumination and animal activity.
 
Additionally, it’s important to know the capabilities of system components, which are designed to read International Organization for Standardization (ISO) protocol RFID tags. The ISO standard is globally recognized for animal identification.
 
There are two types of these tags:
  • FDX tags (or full duplex)
  • HDX tags (or half duplex)
 
Some manufacturers’ equipment can read both tag types and some can read only one or the other. It’s important to know if your system’s components are compatible to ensure accurate data transmission.
 
Regardless of the tag used, it’s essential to ensure proper tag and reader placement.
 
“If tags are randomly applied and not consistently placed in the right position, then the read range is significantly impacted and data accuracy may be compromised,” says Dehli. “It’s worth spending extra time and training with your team to confirm proper tag placement.”
 
2.   Monitor electrical interference
 
Electrical interference can play a major role in interrupting data collection.
 
Before investing in a herd management system, your dealer should conduct a site survey to detect equipment and technology which can interfere with data collection, including variable speed fans and manure pumps, variable speed drives on well pumps and fluorescent lighting. If not installed properly, this equipment can affect your identification system and the reading of tags.
 
“A rule of thumb is to install the variable speed drive as close as possible to the motor it’s controlling. While that’s not easy to do on a dairy farm, it limits the cable length a variable frequency is transmitted through and reduces the chance it will interfere with data collection systems,” explains Dehli.
 
Be mindful of interference and keep an eye out for changes, like the addition of new equipment or flickering fluorescent lighting which may influence ID performance. If there’s a change in data over time, check to see if a device is impeding accurate information flow.
 
3.   Watch, analyze and adjust
 
The beauty of data is you can use it to investigate deeper and see what’s happening on your dairy down to the minute. When reviewing animal performance, it’s vital to assess information accuracy and ensure IDs are read correctly at all checkpoints around the farm, from the milking parlor to the sort gate.
 
Start by developing protocols to regularly assess the accuracy of the identification system.
 
For example, pick a shift to stand in the parlor, either weekly or monthly, to double-check the system by monitoring whether the cow’s ID matches to the stall ID. If not, explore factors possibly skewing the data: Is the RFID tag in the ear? Is the system transponder tag on the neck? Is it twisted? Is the tag working? Did the tag fall off? Is the reader malfunctioning?
 
Many herd management programs offer diagnostic tools to record the number of cows identified or the number of cows not identified. If the number of cows identified changes significantly, check to see what occurred on that date.
 
“Most modern cars will tell you how many miles it’s running per gallon, but if you don’t reset it after every tank of gas, how accurate is it? Were those highway or city miles? Stop-and-go traffic or an 800-mile road trip? Where data comes from and how often it’s calibrated defines whether or not it is relevant,” says Dehli.
 
“You invest in technology to give you actionable information,” he concludes. “If you’re taking actions with animals that don’t need it, what’s the point? It comes down to efficient actions, and accurate data is the key piece of the equation.”
 
Visit nedap-livestockmanagment.com for more information about accurate data management.
 
Nedap Livestock Management is the global leader in farming automation using individual animal identification. For more than 40 years, Nedap strengthens dairy farmers through the most reliable and innovative cow identification, monitoring and automation solutions. They empower managers and personnel with dependable information to make operational and strategic decisions and help dairies become more efficient, productive and successful.
 
For Nedap, trust and reliability in both partnership and technology are key. Leading international dairy farming companies, including genetics and milking equipment suppliers, partner with Nedap to include its technology in their systems. A publicly listed company, Nedap employs more than 800 people globally, across 10 locations and seven business units.

5 Steps To Maximize Your Dairy Cattle Breeding Program

To maximize your dairy cattle breeding program, there are several key steps you can take:

Step 1: Set clear breeding goals

Identify the specific traits you want to improve in your herd, such as milk yield, fertility, or disease resistance. These goals will guide your breeding decisions and help you select the best cows and bulls for your program. Setting clear goals is important for maximizing your dairy cattle breeding program. Here are some steps you can follow to set clear goals:

  1. Identify your priorities: Start by identifying your priorities, such as milk production, genetics, health, or temperament.
  2. Define your breeding objectives: Once you have identified your priorities, define your breeding objectives. For example, if milk production is a priority, your breeding objective might be to increase milk yield while maintaining or improving other traits such as fertility or disease resistance.
  3. Use data to inform your decisions: Use data from your herd, such as milk yield records, health records, and pedigree information to inform your breeding decisions.
  4. Select the right bulls: Use proven bulls that are genetically superior for the traits you want to improve in your herd.
  5. Implement a breeding program: Develop a breeding program that includes a clear plan for selecting sires and managing the genetic diversity in your herd.
  6. Monitor progress: Monitor the progress of your breeding program by regularly measuring and analyzing performance data.
  7. Make adjustments as needed: Adjust your breeding program as needed to ensure you are meeting your goals and making progress towards your objectives.

Remember, setting clear goals and implementing a well-designed breeding program takes time and effort, but can result in significant improvements in your herd’s performance over time.

Step 2: Use the best genetics available

Invest in high-quality genetics from reputable breeders, and use artificial insemination to access the best bulls in the industry. Consider using genomic testing to identify the best animals for breeding, and prioritize animals with strong genetic merit. Using the best genetics available is essential for maximizing your dairy cattle breeding program. Here are some steps you can take to use the best genetics available:

  1. Identify the traits you want to improve: Identify the traits that are most important for your herd, such as milk production, fertility, or disease resistance.
  2. Select high-quality sires: Use high-quality sires with superior genetics for the traits you want to improve. Look for sires that are proven through genetic evaluations, have high breeding values, and come from a reputable breeding program.
  3. Use artificial insemination (AI): AI allows you to use sires from all over the world, giving you access to the best genetics available. Use AI to breed your cows with the highest quality sires.
  4. Monitor performance data: Monitor the performance of your herd and record data on traits that are important for your breeding objectives. This data can help you make informed breeding decisions and track progress over time.
  5. Consider genomic testing: Genomic testing can provide information on the genetic potential of individual animals. This information can help you make more informed breeding decisions and select animals with the highest genetic potential.
  6. Implement a breeding program: Develop a breeding program that includes a clear plan for selecting sires and managing genetic diversity in your herd. Use a combination of natural breeding and AI to achieve your breeding objectives.
  7. Continuously evaluate and adjust: Continuously evaluate the performance of your breeding program and make adjustments as needed to ensure you are making progress towards your breeding objectives.

By using the best genetics available and implementing a well-designed breeding program, you can maximize the performance of your dairy cattle and achieve your breeding objectives over time.

Step 3: Maintain detailed records

Keep accurate and up-to-date records on the performance and traits of each animal in your herd, including milk yield, calving intervals, and health status. This will help you make informed breeding decisions and track the progress of your program over time.  Maintaining detailed records is essential for maximizing your dairy cattle breeding program. Here are some steps you can take to maintain detailed records:

  1. Identify the important data points: Identify the data points that are important for your breeding objectives, such as milk production, fertility, health, and genetic information.
  2. Use a herd management software: Use a herd management software to record and manage data efficiently. Many software options are available that can help you track important data points and make informed breeding decisions.
  3. Develop a record-keeping system: Develop a system for recording data consistently, such as using a standardized format and maintaining records in a centralized location.
  4. Record data regularly: Record data on a regular basis, such as daily, weekly, or monthly, depending on the data point. This will ensure that you have accurate and up-to-date information to inform your breeding decisions.
  5. Analyze data: Analyze data regularly to identify trends and patterns in your herd’s performance. This analysis can help you make informed decisions about breeding, management, and health.
  6. Use data to make informed decisions: Use the data you collect to make informed breeding decisions, such as selecting sires, culling animals, or adjusting management practices.
  7. Continuously evaluate and adjust: Continuously evaluate the performance of your breeding program and adjust your record-keeping system as needed to ensure you are collecting the most relevant data and using it to achieve your breeding objectives.

By maintaining detailed records, you can make informed decisions that maximize the performance of your dairy cattle breeding program.

Step 4: Practice proper herd management

Ensure that your animals are well-fed, healthy, and have access to clean water and comfortable housing. Practice good reproductive management, including timely breeding and proper heat detection, to maximize breeding success.  Here are some steps you can take to practice proper herd management:

  1. Provide good nutrition: Provide your cattle with a balanced diet that meets their nutritional needs. Consult with a nutritionist to ensure that your feed program is optimized for your herd.
  2. Maintain herd health: Develop a herd health program that includes regular vaccinations, parasite control, and preventative care. Monitor your herd for signs of illness or disease and take appropriate measures to treat and prevent the spread of disease.
  3. Manage reproduction: Implement a reproductive management program that includes regular estrus detection, artificial insemination, and pregnancy diagnosis. Monitor the reproductive performance of your herd and adjust your program as needed to optimize breeding success.
  4. Practice good environmental management: Maintain a clean and comfortable environment for your cattle that is free from excess moisture, temperature extremes, and other stressors.
  5. Provide adequate space: Provide your cattle with adequate space to move and access feed and water. Overcrowding can lead to stress, illness, and reduced productivity.

Step 5: Continuously evaluate and improve

Regularly assess the performance and traits of your herd, and make adjustments to your breeding program as needed. Stay up-to-date on new technologies and industry trends, and be willing to adapt your program to changing circumstances. Here are 5 steps you can take to continuously evaluate and improve your program:

  1. Set clear goals: Establish clear goals for your breeding program and regularly assess whether you are making progress towards those goals. This will help you identify areas where you need to focus your attention and make adjustments.
  2. Collect and analyze data: Collect and analyze data regularly to monitor the performance of your herd and track progress towards your breeding objectives. Use this data to identify areas for improvement and make informed breeding decisions.
  3. Seek expert advice: Seek expert advice from veterinarians, nutritionists, and other industry professionals to ensure that you are following best practices and implementing effective strategies.
  4. Continuously educate yourself: Stay up-to-date on the latest research and best practices in dairy cattle breeding by attending conferences, reading industry publications, and networking with other breeders.
  5. Adjust your program as needed: Continuously evaluate the performance of your breeding program and make adjustments as needed to improve efficiency, increase productivity, and achieve your breeding objectives.

By continuously evaluating and improving your breeding program, you can stay on track towards your goals and maximize the performance of your dairy cattle herd.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

By following these steps, you can maximize the success of your dairy cattle breeding program and produce a high-quality, productive, and healthy herd.

Gene-Editing Creates First BVDV-Resistant Calf

Scientists have partnered to create the first gene-edited calf with resistance to bovine viral diarrhoea virus, a virus that costs the cow industry in the United States billions of dollars each year. The USDA’s Agricultural Research Service, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the University of Kentucky, and industry partners Acceligen and Recombinetics, Inc. collaborated on the latest research.

The bovine viral diarrhoea virus is one of the most serious viruses impacting the health and well-being of cattle globally, and experts have been researching it since it was discovered in the 1940s. Although this virus has no effect on humans, it is very infectious among cattle and may cause serious respiratory and intestinal problems.

BVDV may be fatal to pregnant cows because it infects developing calves, resulting in spontaneous abortions and poor birth rates. Some infected calves live to birth and are permanently infected, releasing huge quantities of virus to other cattle. Despite the availability of vaccinations for more than 50 years, managing BVDV illness remains a challenge since immunisations are not always successful in halting transmission.
However, scientists have uncovered the major cellular receptor (CD46) and the location where the virus attaches to that receptor, producing infection in cows during the last 20 years. In this latest work, scientists changed the viral binding site to prevent infection.
“Our goal was to use gene-editing technology to slightly alter CD46 so it wouldn’t bind the virus but would retain all of its normal bovine functions,” said Aspen Workman, lead author and researcher at ARS’ U.S. Meat Animal Research Centre (USMARC) in Clay Centre, Nebraska.
This hypothesis was initially explored in cell culture by the researchers. Acceligen manipulated bovine skin cells to create embryos with the changed gene after witnessing encouraging results in the lab. These embryos were implanted into surrogate cows to see whether this method may help minimise viral infection in living animals.
It worked, and Ginger, the first CD46 gene-edited calf, was born healthily on July 19, 2021. The calf was monitored for many months before being challenged with the virus to see whether she may get sick. She was kept with a BVDV-infected dairy calf that was born shedding virus for a week. Ginger’s cells were substantially less susceptible to BVDV, resulting in no obvious detrimental health consequences.
Ginger’s health and capacity to conceive and nurture her own calves will be continuously monitored by the experts.
This proof-of-concept research shows that gene editing has the potential to reduce the burden of BVDV-associated illnesses in cattle. Because BVDV infection puts calves at risk for secondary bacterial infections, the altered calf provides another possible possibility to reduce the requirement for antibiotics in agriculture. This intriguing characteristic is still in the research stage, and no linked beef is currently entering the US food supply.
The Agricultural Research Service is the primary scientific in-house research organisation of the United States Department of Agriculture. ARS works every day to find answers to agricultural challenges that impact America. Each dollar spent in agricultural research in the United States has a $20 economic effect.

Investigating Dairy Feed: Climate, Cost, and Regional Sourcing

The Netherlands is a European pioneer in using local vegetables and food sector byproducts into dairy cow diets. Every month, the local dairy sector makes greater success in this area, and other nations such as Germany are keeping a careful eye on it.

However, the issue is complicated, according to Dr Wilfried van Straalen of Wageningen University’s Schothorst Feed Research.

What do dairy cows consume now in the Netherlands, and why?

“Cattle feed is primarily byproducts of grain or oil seed processing, with palm expeller meal imported from Indonesia and Malaysia being a common ingredient,” Van Straalen explains. “From 5-25% of the concentrate feed can be palm expeller meal, because it’s high in protein, the price is reasonable, and it’s well evaluated as an energy source within the Dutch feed industry.”

However, utilising less of this feed source is typically regarded desirable in Holland due to worries about local use/transportation as well as concerns about burning forests to produce palm. According to Van Straalen, this feed component is no longer utilised in certain other European nations, such as Scandinavia. This is owing to environmental concerns, but it might also be due to its high transportation costs and abundant supply of local crops like barley and oats.

Dairy feed efficiency: from low protein diets to youngstock
Feed efficiency on a dairy farm improves animal performance while also ensuring a profitable and sustainable enterprise. Rosalinde Goselink was interviewed in this video at the Dairy Campus in Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. She works at Wageningen Livestock Research and does research on this topic. Continue reading…
“Also, in the Netherlands, we feed dairy cows meadow grass, corn silage, and grass silage, as well as wet by-products like beetroot pulp, brewer’s grains, and potato byproducts,” Van Straalen explains. “These products are well suited to ruminant diets.” Brewer’s grains are rich in fibre and low in protein. By-pass starch is present in relatively high concentrations in potato processing by-products. Beetroot pulp was formerly dried and pelleted, but owing to costs, it is now maintained moist and ensiled. It has a lot of digestible fibre, which is great for dairy cows.”

Corn gluten feed, wheat gluten feed, wheat middlings and corn DDGS are also fed to Dutch dairy cows, either locally or from across Europe. These materials are also abundant in protein and fibre. Citrus pulp is also often consumed, although it is becoming more scarce. Wheat, barley, and sunflower meal are further ingredients.

According to Van Straalen, more of these local feed sources from additional areas and sectors are projected to be introduced to the dairy cow diet in Holland. “The dairy industry, as well as the consumer and government, want this,” he argues.

Legislative thrust

The urge for more local feed is motivated by cost, but it is also motivated by rising environmental concerns and laws. Farmers are facing rising limits in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (nitrous oxide, CO2, methane, and ammonia) across the EU, with a particular emphasis on nitrogen restrictions in Holland, as everyone in agriculture is aware.

That is why, as Van Straalen says, there is a trend towards more crude protein in diets, which minimises nitrogen waste. “This will entail a focus on high-quality protein sources, as well as a much closer look at amino acid levels in diets to better match cattle needs,” he adds. In the future, this will be increasingly essential in ruminant feeding.”

Climate Change and Cows From the environment and emissions to food and welfare. Many variables influence how to effectively manage dairy cows in order to farm sustainably. We look at everything from ammonia to carbon emissions and methane in this section. More information may be found here.
He also believes that additional study into how to utilise by-pass amino acids and protein in the diet is needed. That is, there are several methods for protecting amino acids from ruminal breakdown, such as altering the chemical structure or adding a protective coating, to guarantee they remain intact until they are absorbed in the small intestine.

According to Van Straalen, the good news is that amino acid products have greatly improved in terms of by-pass protection as well as gut digestibility.

In the past, good by-pass value was obtained by treating rapeseed meal and soybean meal with formaldehyde, but this treatment has been outlawed in other EU countries and will be phased out in the Netherlands this year. As a result, in the next months, there will be a quick shift in the Netherlands to alternate therapies, untreated meals, or other sources of by-pass protein.

While lupins and peas contain protein with high by-pass value, they must be toasted to do so. According to Van Straalen, this is not yet an industrial practise, but study into it is ongoing at Schothorst Feed study and other institutions and enterprises.

Soybean meal, presumably certified against rainforest damage, is one dairy feed component Van Straalen does not anticipate to alter in Europe in the coming years. This is because to its high protein quality.

ALSO READ: A trial using almond husk feed to minimise methane emissions in dairy cows
Olam Food Ingredients will shortly begin a study in which almond hulls and shells will be reused as a healthy feed source for New Zealand dairy cows. Using this byproduct of almond processing has the potential to cut methane emissions as well as agricultural input costs. Continue reading…
Commitment to sourcing local feed

According to Van Straalen, the Dutch Dairy Association (NZO) has made a general promise that in the future, 65% of protein in the national ration would originate from local sources (including grass). This is part of the bigger ‘On the Way to PlanetProof’ food certification system.
PlanetProof says that “by having a minimum of 50% of the feed generated in-house, [farms] are motivated to further close the cycle…The dairy farmer may conclude the cycle by employing self-produced raw materials such as manure and calf feed, as well as acquiring raw materials in an efficient and restricted manner.”

Education provided by the government

According to Van Straalen, the largest hurdle to raising the quantity of local feed used by Dutch dairy producers is government officials’ lack of expertise.

“To reduce ammonia, the government here has requested voluntary milk production stops and plans to force farm buyouts in 2024 if necessary, but there are other solutions,” he adds.

“We’ve done a lot of research on how to reduce protein, but there’s still work to be done to figure out how low you can go without affecting cow performance.” And if we utilise more grass, if grass is the primary food supply, and farmers do not fertilise the fields, the nitrogen/protein concentration of the grass will be reduced, resulting in decreased ammonia emissions from cow excrement. This implies that we may have to tolerate decreased milk output in order to minimise ammonia levels. More debate of these and other topics is required.”

Should we monitor the number of ovarian follicles in our heifers and cows?

Before answering this question, we need to understand how follicles are formed and what they do. Follicles are the final stage in which germ cells (oocytes or “eggs”) reside before they are ovulated for fertilization by sperm. There is a long history of cattle research in this area, and one of the most important findings was by B.H. Erickson in 1966 (Figure 1). He found that the greatest number of germ cells in ovaries occurred during the fetal stage. At the peak, there were more than 2.5 million germ cells in the ovaries of fetuses. The number of germ cells or follicles then declines throughout life. Importantly, heifers and cows with more ultrasound detectable follicles stay in herds longer. Herd life is a key component of profitability.
 

Figure 1. Number of germ cells in bovine fetuses during gestation.

Follicle development.

Germ cells are the foundational cells that develop into follicles. A germ cell is an oocyte or egg that will eventually be surrounded by other cells to form a microscopic follicle that will continue to grow until it can be monitored by modern ultrasound devices. As shown in Figure 1, most of the germ cells are depleted before the calf is born, but the newborn calf will still have up to hundreds of thousands of follicles for its future.

Small batches of follicles grow regularly in waves during the late fetal stage, and this continues throughout the heifer or cow’s life. Before puberty, it is possible to aspirate oocytes from the follicles of young heifers, and these can be fertilized in vitro to produce embryos that are then transferred into recipients that have reached puberty.

Once a heifer reaches puberty, generally one follicle will ovulate an unfertilized egg into the oviduct about 24 to 30 hours after onset of estrus. If mated or inseminated, most of these newly released oocytes will be fertilized.

In cyclic heifers and cows, batches of follicles develop to detectable sizes in waves that occur 2 or 3 times during each estrous cycle. Longer estrous cycles are more likely to have 3 waves and shorter cycles are more likely to have 2 waves. One can monitor these waves by daily or twice-daily ultrasound detection, and if the animal is monitored several times daily it is easy to monitor the dominant follicle, which will surpass its cohorts in size before it ovulates.

Postpartum cows that are not yet cycling may show irregular patterns of follicle growth. The ovaries may be “small and smooth” without recurring sizable follicles, or there may be a large persistent follicle that is not accompanied by several normal-sized follicles. This is influenced by postpartum uterine function as well as energy balance.

Why does the number of follicles matter?

If one uses ultrasound technologies to monitor the number of follicles on both ovaries of heifers and cows, it will be found that there is about a 7-fold difference among animals. Nevertheless, the number for each animal is highly repeatable (0.95) https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.036277 .

Various research studies have provided evidence that heifers or cows with more ultrasound-detected follicles will stay in the herd longer. Cattle with more follicles respond better to superovulation or oocyte retrieval.

Would monitoring the number of follicles lead to more fertile longer-lived cattle?

Maybe it is time to start monitoring follicle numbers in heifers and cows to determine if there is a genetic basis for the different patterns we see. Heifers with lower numbers of follicles may have lower reproductive life in the herd.

Like any new monitoring technology, there must be some standard practices so that data from different herds are comparable. Monitoring follicle numbers may be easier than one might think. Multiple studies with beef cattle have shown that heifers can be monitored by using ultrasound technologies to count the number of follicles, and this does not have to be done on a specific day of an estrous cycle. This makes it much simpler to collect data at any time once a heifer reaches about 12-14 months of age.

From a practical standpoint, it would be beneficial if we could identify heifers that are more likely to stay in the cow herd longer by monitoring the number of follicles present when these heifers are 12 to 14 months of age. It is too early to know whether this would be valuable in most herds until we have data from many herds across many locations.

The process may be simple. Heifers would be screened by ultrasound evaluation of their ovaries at about 12 to 14 months of age, around the time they are reaching puberty. Subsequently, it would be necessary to correlate the number of follicles counted with important traits such as milk yield, conception rates and herd life. This opportunity, like many others in our dairy selection programs, will only become useful if we find meaningful relationships that are related to herd life and profitability.

 

 

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

 

 

The impact of confinement period on milk production

In a recent study, Texas A&M University researchers discovered that keeping cows in self-locking head stanchions for lengthy periods of time had a negative impact on dairy cow performance.

Lock-up time is the length of time an animal spends restricted or locked into a head stanchion every day, which is often seen at dairy farm feed bunks. Dairy cattle are confined on a regular basis for pregnancy testing, artificial insemination, veterinarian treatments and inspections, immunisations, heat detection, and feeding.

However, it has been shown that using a head lock as a technique of restraint may have a detrimental influence on an individual animal’s well-being and productive performance within a herd, particularly if the device is used outside of the typical management routine.

According to studies, when this management practise is not followed correctly and cows are confined for lengthy periods of time (>4 hours daily), the animals suffer varied degrees of stress, which might jeopardise their productivity, health, and wellbeing.

Researchers investigated the effects of prolonged or extended lock-up period in dairy cattle in this study.

Milk production effects

Reduced milk output in cows is typical when lock-up period surpasses 4 hours, according to data from several research. Scientists from the University of Cambridge discovered that when cows are denied of eating and laying for more than 4 hours during hoof clipping, milk output is lowered by 2 litres per day for 3 days.

Stress is linked to longer durations of lock-up time. According to research, stress alters mammary homeostasis in dairy cows. It has been proposed that the stress caused by a longer lock-up period may result in suboptimal performance of alveoli in the mammary gland, resulting in reduced milk supply, increased mastitis incidence, and worse milk quality.

A comparable investigation on the effects of lying or standing on mammary blood flow in dairy cows found that lying time resulted in 24% greater blood flow to the mammary glands owing to cardiovascular homoeostasis caused by gravity. As a result, decreased lying time as a result of increased lock-up time may be another cause for the reduction in daily milk output in dairy cattle.

Cow protection

Recent research has linked headlock restraint for more than 4 hours per day to increased aggressiveness in dairy calves. This violent activity was discovered to be the result of dissatisfaction or discomfort experienced throughout the constraint phase. Aggressive conduct in dairy cows has been linked to worse reproductive performance, including decreased conception rates for heifers at first service, according to a recent research.

When compared to cows in an extended lock-up period, normal herd management increased the amount of time cows spent reclining, self-grooming, ruminating, and feeding. The changed time budget management as a result of increased lock-up time (>4h) has an impact on total daily cow behaviour. In another research, the authors discovered that cows that were denied laying for 2 hours lost their feeding time for the following 24 hours, and cows who were denied lying for 4 hours required 41 hours to regain their feeding time.

ALSO READ: Dairy feed: cost, climate, and local sourcing
The Netherlands is a European pioneer in using local vegetables and food sector byproducts into dairy cow diets. Every month, the local dairy sector makes greater success in this area, and other nations such as Germany are keeping a careful eye on it. Continue reading…
Lameness and heat exhaustion

Lameness is a serious problem on dairy farms all around the globe, and studies suggest that longer lockup durations may increase the problem. Although studies examining the direct relationship between lock-up hours and lameness are lacking, some study work implies the possibility of the impact.

Researchers discovered that cows exposed to tight feed alleys and limited lunge space, resulting in more cow standing, were more prone to lameness in their study published in the Journal of Dairy Science. According to another research, prolonged lock-up time adds to departures from the typical daily time budget, demonstrating variability in lying time and lying bouts that predispose cows to lameness. However, experts recommend that the possible direct relationship between increased lock-up time and lameness be investigated further.

Furthermore, studies found that extended lock-up time (>4h) was more detrimental in hotter temperatures than in mild temperatures due to the additive effect of restraint stress and heat stress, implying that it is more critical to minimise lock-up time in extreme heat environments to reduce the detrimental effects of these stressors.

Cow in transition

During the changeover phase, the cows need extra lock-up time. Cows change their behaviour during the transition period, which is defined as the three weeks before and three weeks after calving. The transition phase is a key stage in the life of a dairy cow because of the animal’s vulnerability to illness and the nutritional, physiological, and social changes that occur around the time of calving.

However, due of the need to carefully watch the animal for post-calving examinations and treatment of health concerns, dairy cows in the transition phase are more prone to extended headlock periods. As a result, transition cow stressors should be reduced, and lock-up management procedures should be constantly monitored for the effects on the transition cow’s time budget and cow comfort.

What is the ideal timing for head lock-up?

The head lock-up time studies fall short of identifying the required period without causing health and productivity issues. Several studies have shown that keeping cows in self-locking head stanchions for a lengthy amount of time (>4 hours per day) may have a negative impact on dairy cow performance. The emphasis should be on properly managing the farm by limiting restraint time to less than 4 hours per day and avoiding the use of headlocks during the late morning and afternoon hours of the warmer months.

Mitch Theurer and Mike Brad, dairy consultants affiliated with the Standard Nutrition Company, recommended the following lock-up periods in their research concentrating on issues that restrict cows’ time budget:

Lock-up periods should be kept to a maximum of two hours.
Schedule lockup periods to correspond with feedings and urge cows to the bunk, rather than setting the locks 3 hours before the event.
During lock-up, always have enough of fresh feed on hand.
Researchers proposed future study effort to focus on the impact of varied lock-up periods on the health and productivity of dairy cows in order to better appropriate lock-up time.

Type characteristics, inbreeding, and productivity all have an impact on survival in US Jersey cattle.

Lower replacement costs, greater average milk output, and fewer replacement heifers are all connected with increased lifespan. Because longevity statistics are collected late in life, stayability, defined as the chance of surviving from birth to a specific age, may be used as an alternative metric. The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of various type features, inbreeding, and production level on the stayability of Jersey cows at various ages, as well as to track changes over time. The data set included 460,172 to 204,658 stayability records for survival from birth to 36, 48, 60, 72, or 84 months of age, depending on the duration of the opportunity period. Threshold models were used to analyse the stayability features, which included explanatory factors such as various type attributes, inbreeding coefficient, and within-herd production level. Stayability trait heritability estimates varied from 0.05 (36 mo) to 0.22 (84 mo). As predicted, the likelihood of survival declined with age. Regardless of age or the type attribute tested, highly productive cows were more likely to survive than their poor-producing peers. Our data show that farmers’ selection choices tend to penalise low productivity in the beginning and reward good production later on. Inbreeding reduced the likelihood of survival, particularly when inbreeding coefficients surpassed 10%, and this effect was most obvious at 48 months of age or later. Some personality features, such as size and foot angle, have minimal influence on survival. Other type attributes, such as strength, dairy shape, rump breadth, and rear legs, had a better likelihood of survival at intermediate scores, while fore udder attachment, rear udder height, udder depth, and final score had a lower probability of survival at higher scores. Finally, our findings show that the chance of survival has reduced over the previous decade, most likely owing to a larger number of available heifers and, as a consequence, increased culling rates.

Longevity in dairy cattle is linked to lower replacement costs and higher average milk output. Farmers cull low-producing cows willingly for economic reasons in order to increase farm profitability. Poor reproduction, injuries, and diseases, on the other hand, might require the forced culling of productive animals, increasing veterinary expenses and decreasing farm profitability. In addition to milk output, linear type features and inbreeding may be linked to culling, either directly or indirectly via connections with disease, injury, or infertility. Stayability may be used as an alternate metric to longevity since it is assessed late in life. Small heritability estimates for STAY36, STAY48, STAY60, STAY72, and STAY84 in our analysis imply that selection for enhanced stayability would result in gradual genetic gains. Kern et al., 2014 discovered similar findings when using a threshold model to assess the lifetime of Holstein cattle. Productive life is used to assess the duration from first calving till culling in the lifetime net merit index (NM$) published by the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (Cole et al., 2021), and it gets a relative economic focus of approximately 20% in Jersey cattle (VanRaden et al., 2021). As a result, despite the possibility of sluggish genetic improvement owing to low heritability, selection for longevity is critical in US dairy cattle. Furthermore, since it is substantially and favourably connected with survival until later ages, stayability till younger ages may be a suitable selection criteria for longevity.
Through its correlation with the occurrence of certain illnesses and injuries, type features are indirectly associated to lifespan. Poor foot and limb conformation, for example, has been linked to higher lameness genetically (Khansefid et al., 2021). In earlier research, however, the connection between chance of survival and foot angle and rear leg scores in Jersey and Holstein-Friesian cows was minimal (Caraviello et al., 2003; Williams et al., 2022a). Our research discovered a little link between STAY60 and foot angle score, while rear leg score seemed to have greater impacts on survival, with reduced survival at both extremes. Rump angle scores with low or high pins may be connected to calving problems, which might increase the likelihood of culling (Sewalem et al., 2004), and our findings revealed that cows with an intermediate rump angle were more likely to live to 60 months of age. Poor teat placement has been linked to lower machine milking efficiency and a higher incidence of subclinical mastitis (Singh et al., 2017), and our study found that cows with more central teat placement, and thus intermediate scores for front and rear teat placement (side and rear views), had a higher chance of survival. Other udder-related type features, including as udder depth, udder cleft, fore udder attachment, rear udder height, and rear udder breadth, are linked to variances in milk production and injury sensitivity. Among the type characteristics evaluated, Caraviello et al. (2003) found that udder features were the most significant predictors of lifespan in Jersey cattle. Similar to the current research, the authors reported a significant danger of culling for animals with low scores for those features, with declining rewards in survival likelihood as type scores neared their maximum. In earlier investigations with Holstein and Jersey cattle, height was shown to be the least relevant feature in terms of survival (Caraviello et al., 2003; Sewalem et al., 2004). Notably, within-herd ranking for milk production has a considerable effect on culling choices, and its relevance in comparison to type features seems to have risen over time. Cows with high final scores had identical chances of surviving in the past, regardless of milk production level. Cows with poor milk output, although having excellent type ratings, seem to be removed from the herd in recent years.
owing to increased homozygosity, inbreeding depression has significant direct consequences on performance, which may lead to greater culling owing to poor production, longer calving intervals, lower conception rates, and higher somatic cell scores (Doekes et al., 2019). Caraviello et al., 2003 found that animals with inbreeding coefficients more than 7% had a higher risk of culling, and they found a roughly linear association between risk of culling and inbreeding coefficients. According to Sewalem et al. (2006), Jersey cows with inbreeding coefficients more than 12.5 were around 30% more likely to be culled than their less-inbred peers. Furthermore, the impact of inbreeding on survival may rise throughout parities; for example, du Toit et al., 2012 found a greater correlation between inbreeding and survival in second-lactation Jersey cattle in South Africa than in their first-parity counterparts.
Because mature cows who are highly productive and need minimal veterinary treatments are extremely lucrative, genetic increase of lifespan may have a large economic effect on dairy herds (Garca-Ruiz et al., 2016; Dallago et al., 2021). Furthermore, most cows do not recoup their raising expenses until the second lactation (Boulton et al., 2017), and early culling of cows results in economic losses for the farmer. Longevity increases may also have an impact on environmental sustainability and animal welfare. Increased annual herd replacement rates, for example, can contribute to higher greenhouse gas emissions at the farm level (Wall et al., 2012; Grandl et al., 2019), and higher involuntary culling rates in young animals can indicate poor welfare, which can influence consumers’ perceptions of and demand for dairy products. Furthermore, excess heifers that are not required as herd replacements may be sold to generate extra farm revenue (Dallago et al., 2021). Finally, by combining the use of sexed semen on young cows and heifers with the use of beef semen on older cows, farmers can profit from high milk production from mature cows without jeopardising genetic progress, allowing mature cows that are healthy and reproductively sound to remain in the herd for one or two additional lactations.
Management practises, infrastructure, herd size, economic demands, and other variables have all lowered the likelihood of cow survival in commercial dairy herds. For example, with the introduction of sexed sperm, a greater number of heifers are now accessible as herd replacements. Furthermore, producers may be driven to raise culling rates if facilities or available area restrict herd size (de Vries, 2020). Furthermore, genomic selection has accelerated genetic development and produced replacement heifers with increased milk production capacity (Meuwissen et al., 2001; Williams et al., 2022b). Despite genetic advances in productive life and other fitness qualities, these and other variables have resulted in a lower chance of surviving to old ages in Jerseys and other breeds. This apparent paradox results from ongoing changes in the balance of voluntary (economic) and involuntary (forced) culling, and breed improvement programmes should aim to improve animals’ genetic proclivity to remain healthy, fertile, and productive as long as they can make greater economic contributions to the herd than their potential replacements.

Source: Journal of Dairy Science

The implications of precision livestock farming on sustainable dairy

Precision animal husbandry, according to researchers, produced more sustainability on various dairy farms than conventional practises.

Precision livestock farming approaches involve installing sensors and instruments on livestock farms and/or animals to monitor them and assist farmers in making decisions. Precision livestock husbandry recognises warning signs and increases cattle efficiency.

This monitoring has a direct impact on animal welfare, health, and production, as well as on farmer lifestyle (fewer hours worked), knowledge, and traceability of livestock products. Instead, the indirect implications include a reduced carbon footprint and enhanced social-economic indices of cattle products.

Researchers from the University of Milan in Italy investigated the development of a dairy farming indicator that takes into consideration the indirect repercussions.

Dairy farmers’ sustainability cornerstones

The indicator was created by merging the three sustainability pillars (with particular criteria): environmental (carbon footprint), social (animal welfare freedoms and antibiotic usage), and economic (cost of technology and labour utilisation).

It was then tested on three dairy farms in Italy, where a baseline conventional scenario (BS) was contrasted to an alternative scenario (AS) that used precision animal farming methods and better management solutions.

The first farm investigated heat stress, while the other two focused on the identification of oestrus occurrences and the impact of unrestricted access to pasture.

The findings showed that the carbon footprint in all AS decreased by 6% to 9%, and the socioeconomic metrics improved animal and worker welfare, with slight variances according to the investigated approach.

Investing in precision livestock farming methods has a beneficial impact on all or almost all of the sustainability indices, with case-specific considerations. According to the researchers, since the indicator is a user-friendly tool that allows for the testing of many scenarios, stakeholders (policymakers and farmers) might use it to choose the optimal path for investments and incentive programmes.

Using Automation to Benefit New York Dairy Farmers

Dairy cow illnesses cost New York dairy producers millions of dollars each year in diminished milk sales and treatment, labour, and culling expenses. Maintaining a healthy and productive herd, as every dairy farmer knows, requires robust health monitoring practises for accurate and early illness identification. However, owing to labour restrictions, this has proven more challenging for farmers.

The usage of Automated Health Monitoring systems (AHM) might be one approach. AHMs use sensors to monitor cow behaviour and physiology and identify possible health concerns. While farmers are using this technology, there is little independent study showing its worth. NYFVI is supporting a research at Cornell University with Dr. Julio Giordano to investigate their efficacy.

In this study, researchers will evaluate the performance of AHM systems to non-intensive health monitoring methods used on dairy farms. The study will specifically compare AHM systems to dairy farm situations that lack labour, time, or both for effective cow monitoring.

The initiative also aims to close a significant knowledge gap in the dairy sector by teaching farm health-care personnel, extension educators, professionals, and students at SUNY institutions and Cornell University in the use of AHM. Participants will learn how to utilise and maximise the value of AHM tools in hands-on workshops in English and Spanish.

“We are excited to roll out this project aimed at addressing some of the most pressing herd management challenges for commercial dairy farms in NY,” stated Cornell University professor and project leader Julio Giordano. We will increase cow health by using automated health monitoring technology while lowering labour requirements and animal disturbance. We will test and illustrate the benefit of automated monitoring systems for farms who, owing to a lack of time or manpower, struggle to identify cows that need treatments or interventions.

“Our on-farm training programme for cow health-care technicians will help current and future users of technology be more proficient and feel more comfortable with their operation and value for herd management in order to foster adoption and better use of automated monitoring technologies.” Finally, this research will benefit dairy farms by enhancing the health and production of dairy cows and assisting farm staff in more efficiently using technology.”

Simple Management Strategies for Your Dairy Herd’s Fertility Cycle

Over the last two decades, the dairy sector has seen a revolution in herd fertility success. Widespread fertility programmes, as well as the industry’s greater understanding—and optimization—of the holistic relationships between a dairy cow’s body condition, general health, and fertility, are at the core of this leap ahead. Researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Michigan State University synthesise the past three decades of scientific research explaining these relationships and highlight the key actionable takeaways for establishing and maintaining high fertility in a dairy herd in a recent mini-review published in a special fertility issue of JDS Communications®, published by Elsevier.

One of the co-authors, Richard Pursley, PhD, of Michigan State University, created the phrase “high fertility cycle” to reflect this knowledge of the interconnected components on a dairy farm that combine to promote reproductive success.

“We now know that reproductive success is tied to other health markers in a dairy herd after two or more decades of research,” Pursley explained, “and we set out to show how this knowledge can be utilised to maximise a herd’s fertility rate through simple, applicable changes in farm production management.”

In their mini-review, the scientists looked back over three decades of dairy research to give the fundamental findings on this issue. They begin by creating a link between fertility and the bodily condition score (BCS), which is a consistent 5-point scoring system in.A realistic management tool for Holstein cows that is 25 increments long and utilised to understand their body fat or energy levels.

“We know from the research that healthier postpartum cows have better embryo quality, higher fertility at first insemination, and fewer early pregnancy losses after becoming pregnant,” said co-author Paul Fricke, PhD, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Furthermore, BCS reduction after calving was linked to an increase in health difficulties, while maintaining or increasing BCS after calving was linked to less reported health events, such as metritis, mastitis, ketosis, and pneumonia.

So, how can dairy farms guarantee that their herds retain or grow BCS after calving in order to produce healthy cows and good reproductive rates? According to the study, the crucial aspect is calving cows with a BCS between 2.75 and 3.0, which may be accomplished by employing an intensive reproductive control programme. Getting cows pregnant as soon as the voluntary waiting period ends assures a lower BCS at calving, which leads to less body condition loss after calving and hence healthier cows who are more reproductive and better able to get pregnant again, resuming the cycle.

NY farmers face growing labour expenses as minimum wage rises again.

New York state legislators approved a $229 billion spending package earlier this week that would gradually raise the state’s minimum wage to $17 in New York City and its suburbs and $16 in the rest of the state by 2026.

Raising the minimum wage might be the last nail in the coffin for many.

“There will be changes at farms as these costs rise and farms look to cope and deal,” said Steve Ammerman, Communications Director for the New York Farm Bureau.
In Valatie, dairy farmer Eric Ooms of A. Ooms and Sons Dairy has hundreds of cows to milk every day – a large chore that used to take several hours of labour.

With labour prices rising, he realised something had to give.

“To address higher costs, we’ve always tried to find ways to minimise labour.” “In the dairy industry, that means robotics,” said Ooms.
Instead of training employees, he now uses technology to educate his cows to milk themselves.

When the cows want to be milked, they just go up to the machine, which does the rest.

“So, the cow comes in, and the robot identifies who she is, and it has all the information on the cow on the screen,” Ooms added.

He claims that, in the long run, employing technology is less expensive than paying workers.

However, rising expenses have made it impossible for some dairy producers to remain in business.

“With inflation, overtime, minimum wage, unions, and so on, it’s no longer worth doing business in this state,” said dairy farmer Raymond Dykeman of Dykeman & Sons Inc in Fultonville.

“We can’t make ends meet because we have no control over the price we’ll receive for our product,” he continued.

Dairy pricing are federally controlled, which means they are not determined by farmers.

“As a result, they have no control over passing on those higher labour costs,” Ammerman said. “They’re going to have to absorb them.”

While the state has implemented tax credit schemes to assist farmers financially, there are concerns about their long-term viability.

“Tax credit–someone has to pay for that, so people’s taxes pay for that, and that doesn’t make a lot of sense to me,” Ooms said.

Selecting The Sires of Tomorrow’s to Get the Best Herd Replacements

The entire dairy cattle improvement industry is involved as new data points are captured and analyzed and the information is provided back to the farm level for both genetic and management purposes.

The challenge that presents for each herd genetic manager is to determine which sire information and sires need to be used starting today to produce tomorrow’s heifer and milking herds.

Sire Selection is Important and Challenging

Using top-ranked sires is and will continue to be important. It is a known fact that over ninety per cent of a herd’s genetic advancement is the result of sires used to produce the sire stacks of a herd’s females.

The on-farm decisions are no longer as simple as which breed to own and making breeding decisions based on phenotypic sire daughter averages and female phenotypes. Dairy farmers realize that sires that leave average or below average performance in their daughters are not the best choices.

Refining Sire Genetic Indexing

The global dairy cattle breeding industry is working on research and development to identify sires which have the important heritable traits for maximizing tomorrow’s milk checks and minimizing on-farm costs of production. This work is not a new initiative but the rate of change in traits with data points, in the importance of traits and in identifying superior parents is ever increasing.

What is the Scope of Future Dairy Cattle Breeding?

Until the present time in dairy cattle breeding the major focus has been on the milking cows. That has already started to change. It will continue to expand to cover both milk composition and meat production.

Breeding will include all animal lifecycle stages, starting at conception. Data definition, data accuracy, trait heritabilities and economic values will continue to be key components in male and female genetic indexing. We can expect the scope and rate of change in dairy cattle breeding information to speed up. This is called dynamic progress.

Future Breeding Themes in Sire Selection

Dairy farmers recognize that the process of genetically improving their animals is dynamic. The Bullvine offers the following four sire selection themes for the consideration of our readers:

Theme #1 – Sire Selection for Revenue Generation 

Milk composition has become a key determining factor in the size of every milk check. Ways to maximize future revenue via sire selection decisions can include shipping only A2A2 beta casein milk, shipping only BB kappa casein milk and shipping high %Fat milk.

Other revenue sources can include beef animal sales and breeding stock or genetic sales. Profit margins for these sources will depend on marketing of the product, customer availability or preference and cost-control.

Theme #2 – Sire Selection for Production and Efficiency 

Increased on-farm profit from sire selection for increased production and efficiencies will be an even more integral part of every herd’s and the dairy industry’s future success. Animal genetic indexing associated with feed conversion and methane reduction will gain in accuracy and use in the next few years.

Theme #3 – Sire Selection for Functionality and Longevity

With automated data capture occurring for more functional traits dairy farmers will be able to select sires that improve heifer performance, reduce cow cull rates and extend average female lifetimes. In a few years there will be sire indexes available for genetically improving feet, locomotion, parlor performance and heifer performance.

Theme #4 – Sire Selection for Health and Fertility

Many traits are now genetically evaluated for both health and fertility traits, but dairy farmers can expect genetic indexes for more traits coming from new data capture systems. On the health side the data will be beneficial at both the farm level and at the consumer satisfaction level.

Sire Selection Step #1 – Getting in the Ball Park

From the top 25 Jersey to 100 Holstein sires on the total merit index lists (TMI’s) select 10-20 sires for closer examination. Include in the list only sires that are breed improvers (60-99%RK) for at least three of the four above themes.

Some notes:

Sires selected can be either daughter proven or genomic.

National or company TMI’s are designed to improve a dairy cow population. However individual herds may see benefit from using a customized TMI.

Sire Selection Step #2 – Fine Tune the Selection

Narrow down the list of sires from Step #1, ensuring there is at least one breed leading sire for each theme and then purchase semen from either or both proven and genomic evaluated sires. Sires should be mated to females according to their breeding theme strength(s) and their mates breeding theme limitations(s).

Some notes:

  • The number of sires from which semen is purchased will vary by herd size. Larger herds should purchase more sires, especially genomic sires. That will spread the risk.
  • Some dairy farmers may choose after purchasing sires to randomly mate their females.
  • Make semen purchase decisions based on cost-benefit, not lowest cost. Semen cost is only 1% of dairy farm expenses.

It is Best to Rank Sires Relative to Their Peers

A sire’s genetic index number is not informative on where a sire ranks amongst his peers. The index number does not tell what the population average or range in animal index values are for a trait.

Productive Life (PL) for USA sires, born 2015-2022, average (50% rank) 2.8 in Holsteins and 1.7 in Jerseys. Note those averages are not zero. For PL to be significantly improved in USA dairy cattle sires should be more than 84%RK. That means that a sire’s PL’s need to be greater than 4.7 (proven) and 5.9 (genomic) for Holsteins and 3.5 (proven) and 5.1 (genomic) for Jerseys.

Functional traits published by Lactanet must be 105 for a sire to have an 83%RK for a trait. Sires rate 115 and higher are 99%RK.

Analysis of the Current Top TMI Sires for %RK

Tables 1 and 2 contain twenty-seven breed leading sires (April 2023) for Holstein and Jersey breeds and their %RK’s for four currently genetically indexed major categories/traits and three milk composition assessments.

Table 1 Breed Leading Holstein Sires %RK for Breeding Themes

Rank in Population (April ’23) for Breeding Themes

Sire(NAAB Code) Industry Leadership Production    Fertility     Longevity Conformation   Beta Casein Kappa Casein % Fat Change                Sire Stack              
Holstein – Canada – Lactanet                  
Alligator(200HO10593)     #5Tie CONF & #8 LPI     65 %RK     77 %RK     83 %RK     99 %RK     A1A2     AE      zero Kingboy x McCutchen x Observer
Lambda (551HO03379) #2 LPI & #5 tie CONF     78 %RK     70 %RK     98 %RK     99 %RK     A1A2     BB      zero Delta x Uno x Snowman
Master (799HO00016)     #1 tie CONF       11 %RK     08 %RK     17 %RK     99 %RK     A1A2     n/a      – Avalanche x Doorman x Goldwyn
PUNCH* (200HO12619)     #1 gPro$       99 %RK     91 %RK     92 %RK     88 %RK     A2A2     BB      +++ Ranger Red x AltaZazzle x Yoda
Pursuit (200HO11186)     #2 Pro$ & #5 LPI     95 %RK     44 %RK     83 %RK     91 %RK     A1A2     AA      ++ Imax x Profit x Supersire
RANGER RED(200HO07956)      #1 Red gLPI       94 %RK     91 %RK     98 %RK     96 %RK     A1A2     BB      ++ Rubels x Salvatore x Rubicon
Sidekick (200HO10992)     #1 tie CONF       13 %RK     48 %RK     72 %RK     99 %RK     A2A2     AB      +++ Abbott x McCutchen x Lavanguard
Unix (20003913)     Highly Used       13 %RK     37 %RK     55 %RK     96 %RK     A1A1     BE      Uno x Domain x Goldwyn
Zard (200HO12711)      #1 gLPI       99 %RK     38 %RK     94 %RK     99 %RK     A2A2     BB      ++ Ranger Red x Cockpit x Helix
Holstein – United States – CDCB                  
Captain (551HO04119)     #1 TPI, #3 NM$ & #3 CM$     99 %RK     89 %RK     88 %RK     65 %RK     A2A2     AA      ++ Charl x Sabre x Shamrock
Frost Bite (7HO15821) #1gDWP$, #6gNM$, #6gCM$     99 %RK     99 %RK     97 %RK     25 %RK     A2A2     AB      + Granada x Lionel x Samuri
King Doc (250HO12961)    Highly Used & PTAT 3.23     60 %RK     18 %RK     58 %RK     99 %RK     A1A2     BB      zero Kingboy x Mack x Snowman
Lockstep (001HO16537)     #1 gNM$ & #1 gCM$     99 %RK     77 %RK     96 %RK     30 %RK     A1A2     AB      +++ GreyCup x Stealth x Positive
Lionel (7HO14454) #1NM$&CM$, #2TPI&DWP$     99 %RK     36 %RK     65 %RK     46 %RK      A2A2     AA      + Frazzled x Montross x Supersire
Luster-P (7HO14160)     #1 P TPI & PTAT 2.83     81 %RK     57 %RK     64 %RK     99 %RK     A2A2     AB      + Zipit-P x Kingboy x Supersire
Myriad-P (29HO20620)     #1 P gTPI       99 %RK     94 %RK     62 %RK       59 %RK     A1A2     AE      +++ Mendel-P x Luster-P x Achiever
Parfect (7HO15085)     #3 TPI & PTAT 2.71     95 %RK     77 %RK      80 %RK     96 %RK     A2A2     BB      ++ Renegade x Lambda x Denver
Thorson(551HO04520)   #2 gNM$, #2 gCM$, #3 gTPI      99 %RK     80 %RK     57 %RK     42 %RK     A2A2     AB      +++ Cowen x Charl x Director

 

CODING
* Punch has an identical twin with exactly the same indexes
%Fat – +++/++ significant improver, + improver, zero no improvement, -/– lowers %Fat
Color – (Red) theme <60%RK and daughters will be average or below average
         – (Black) theme 60-83%RK and daughters will be above average
       – (Blue) theme 84-99%RK and daughters will be significantly above average
Note
Data Sources – CDCB and Lactanet files, reports and publications – April 2023

Table 2 Breed Leading Jersey Sires %RK for Breeding Themes

Rank in Population (April ’23) for Breeding Themes

              Health &     Potential for Increased Revenue  
Sire(NAAB Code) Industry Leadership Production    Fertility     Longevity Conformation   Beta Casein Kappa Casein % Fat Change                Sire Stack              
         %RK              
Jersey – North America                  
Chatham (7JE01789)     #1 CM$ & #2 JPI     99 %RK     99 %RK     92 %RK     70 %RK      A2A2     BB      Enzo x Lemonhead x Pharoah
Chief (200JE10034) #1Pro$, #2LPI, #2CM$, #4JPI     99 %RK     60 %RK     80 %RK     89 %RK     A2A2     BB      – Checkmate x Chrome x Fastrack
CINNAMON (200JE01422)     #1 gLPI       99 %RK     97 %RK     87 %RK     91 %RK     A2A2     BB      zero Machoman x Got Maid x Cord
Schooner (29JE04426)     #1 gJPI & #5 gCM$     99 %RK     50 %RK     56 %RK     53 %RK     A2A2     BB      zero  Thrasher x Completely x Marlo
TheBoss (200JE01334)     #1gCM$       98 %RK     97 %RK     95 %RK     68 %RK     A1A2     BB      + Got Maid x Chief x Viceroy
Thrasher (7JE01758)     #1 JPI & #3 CM$     99 %RK     99 %RK     87 %RK     50 %RK     A2A2     BB      — Pilgrim x Viceroy x Soleil
Victorious (7JE05032)     #1 CONF       41 %RK     60 %rRK     83 %RK     99 %RK     A2A2     BB      + Barnabas x Iatola x Duaiseoir
VIVALDI (200JE07756)     #1 LPI & #2 Pro$     97 %RK     71 %RK     85 %RK     99 %RK     A2A2     n/a      ++++ Lix x Implus x Paramont
Wichita (200JE01343)    #1 gPro$       99 %RK     21 %RK     38 %RK     81 %RK     A2A2     AB      Sinatra x Dancer x Tarheel
CODING
%Fat – ++++ significant improver, + improver, zero no I,improvement, –/- lowers %Fat
Color – (Red) theme <60%RK and daughters will be average or below average
       – (Black) theme 60-83 %RK and daughters will be above average
         – (Blue) theme 84-99 %RK and daughters will be significantly above average
Note
Data Sources – CDCB and Lactanet files, reports and publications – April 2023

Some takeaway points from Tables 1 and 2 are:

  • All the sires in the table are breed leaders for one or more TMI or trait indexes.
  • %RK is a good and quick tool to position a sire’s indexes in the national herd for its breed.
  • It is a high standard but only two Holstein and two Jersey sires of the twenty-seven are improvers or leave the desired milk components for all seven categories in the tables.
  • 85% of the sires are breed improvers for production. It is the other categories that require focused consideration when selecting sires. 37.5% of the time in the six other categories the sire is not an improver or desired for milk composition.
  • A TMI index is a good first sort for selecting sires, but it is necessary to dig deeper and identify a sire’s strengths and limitations.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Dairy farmers should be prepared to select and use sires based on new functional, health and performance trait indexes once those indexes become available.

It is recommended that dairy farmers have a plan for which traits need genetic improvement in their herd.

Use all the genetic facts when making sire selection decisions, including if a sire is below average for a trait.

The saying – Select the Best (>83%RK) and Ignore the Rest (<60%RK) – should be practised when selecting sires.

 

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

 

 

What is Mastitis Costing You?

Mastitis is a common and costly problem in the dairy industry, and it can have a significant impact on the profitability of dairy farms. Mastitis is an infection of the udder that can result in reduced milk production, increased veterinary costs, and decreased milk quality. Here are some ways that mastitis can cost you:

  1. Reduced milk production
    Cows with mastitis produce less milk than healthy cows, which can lead to lower revenue for dairy farmers.  The severity of milk production loss can vary depending on the severity and duration of the infection, as well as the cow’s immune response and management practices. Cows with mastitis may also have a reduced appetite and may not eat as much feed, which can further contribute to reduced milk production. In addition, cows with mastitis may experience pain and discomfort, leading to reduced activity and mobility, which can also impact milk production. Reduced milk production due to mastitis can have a significant impact on the profitability of dairy farms, as milk is the primary source of revenue for most dairy operations. In addition to the direct loss of milk yields, mastitis can also result in lower milk quality, increased veterinary costs, and decreased cow health and welfare. To minimize the impact of mastitis on milk production, dairy farmers can implement good management practices to prevent and control infections. This can include regular udder health monitoring, proper milking techniques, appropriate use of antibiotics and other treatments, and maintaining clean and comfortable living conditions for cows. Early detection and treatment of mastitis is also important to prevent further damage to the udder and minimize the impact on milk production.
  2. Increased veterinary costs
    Treating mastitis can be expensive, especially if multiple cows in a herd are affected. Antibiotics, veterinary services, and other treatment costs can quickly add up.  In addition, mastitis can also lead to other health problems, such as lameness or reproductive issues, which may require additional veterinary attention and expense. Cows with severe or chronic mastitis may also require culling, which can result in lost revenue and increased replacement costs. Preventing and managing mastitis is essential for reducing veterinary costs in dairy farming. Implementing good management practices, such as regular udder health monitoring, proper milking techniques, and maintaining clean and comfortable living conditions for cows, can help prevent infections and minimize the need for veterinary treatment. Early detection and treatment of mastitis is also important to prevent further damage to the udder and minimize the need for more extensive and costly therapies. Regular herd health evaluations and working closely with a veterinarian can help identify and address mastitis and other health issues in a timely and cost-effective manner. Overall, the cost of veterinary treatment for mastitis can vary depending on the severity and duration of the infection, as well as the management practices and resources available to the farm. By implementing good management practices and working closely with a veterinarian, dairy farmers can minimize the impact of mastitis on veterinary costs and the overall profitability of their operation.
  3. Decreased milk quality
    Mastitis can also affect the quality of milk, leading to lower prices and reduced demand from processors and consumers. Milk with high somatic cell counts (a measure of udder health) can also result in penalties from milk buyers.  One of the primary ways that mastitis can impact milk quality is by increasing the somatic cell count (SCC) in milk. Somatic cells are white blood cells that are present in milk as a response to infection or inflammation in the udder. When cows have mastitis, their udder tissue is inflamed, which causes an increase in the number of somatic cells in the milk. High SCC levels in milk are an indicator of udder health problems, and can negatively impact milk quality and shelf life, leading to lower prices and decreased demand from processors and consumers. Mastitis can also cause changes in the composition of milk, such as decreased protein and fat content. This can lead to lower milk yields and decreased profitability for dairy farmers. In addition to the direct impact on milk quality, mastitis can also result in milk waste, as milk from cows with mastitis may need to be discarded or diverted for other uses. This can further impact the profitability of dairy farms. Preventing and managing mastitis is essential for maintaining milk quality in dairy herds. Good management practices, such as proper milking techniques, regular udder health monitoring, and appropriate use of antibiotics and other treatments, can help prevent infections and minimize the impact of mastitis on milk quality. Early detection and treatment of mastitis is also important to prevent further damage to the udder and minimize the impact on milk quality.
  4. Time and labor
    Treating mastitis can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring extra attention and care for affected cows. This can take time away from other farm activities and increase labor costs.  To effectively manage mastitis, dairy farmers need to invest time and labor in several tasks, such as:

    1. Regular monitoring and examination of cows: This involves checking the udder for any signs of infection, such as swelling, heat, or pain. Regular monitoring is important to detect mastitis early, which can help prevent further damage to the udder and minimize the impact on milk production.
    2. Isolation and treatment of infected cows: Infected cows need to be identified and separated from the rest of the herd to prevent the spread of infection. They also require treatment with antibiotics and other therapies, which may need to be administered multiple times a day for several days.
    3. Additional milking time and labor: Infected cows may require additional milking time and labor, as their udder may need to be milked more frequently to reduce swelling and prevent further damage to the udder tissue.
    4. Cleaning and disinfection: Proper cleaning and disinfection of milking equipment, barns, and other areas where cows are housed is essential to prevent the spread of mastitis and other infections.

    The time and labor required to manage mastitis can vary depending on the severity and duration of the infection, as well as the management practices and resources available to the farm. Dairy farmers can minimize the impact of mastitis on time and labor costs by implementing good management practices, such as regular udder health monitoring, proper milking techniques, and maintaining clean and comfortable living conditions for cows. Early detection and treatment of mastitis is also important to prevent further damage to the udder and minimize the need for additional time and labor in managing infected cows.

Overall, the cost of mastitis can vary depending on the severity and extent of the infection, as well as the management practices and resources available to the farm. Preventing and managing mastitis is essential for maintaining the health and profitability of dairy herds. This can include regular udder health monitoring, good milking practices, and appropriate use of antibiotics and other treatments.

An experiment in feeding cows hopes to mitigate the climatic damage caused by their flatulence.

A vital experiment to address the effect of cattle on climate change is underway in our own neighbourhood, as a farm in the North Bay approaches carbon neutrality.

According to scientists, methane is 25 times more powerful than carbon dioxide.

UC Davis professor Ermias Kebreab has been spearheading studies on how feed additives like red seaweed might minimise methane emissions from animals.

“I see this as a way to drastically reduce methane emissions,” Kebreab remarked.

His most recent experiment, conducted with his team of animal scientists, involves the addition of grape pomace, a byproduct of winemaking, to cow diet.

“We are looking into some feed additives that would allow us to reduce methane emissions by 80-to-90%, which was unthinkable about ten years ago,” said Kebreab.

So far, the red seaweed seems to be the most promising.

It includes bromoform, a chemical that reduces methane formation in cow stomachs. The Straus Family Farm in Tomales Bay hosted the first commercial trial in the United States in 2021.

“This is a continuation of what I’ve been working on all my life,” Albert Straus said.

Straus has dedicated his life to making his farm carbon-neutral, including converting heavy gear like the farm’s front loader to all-electric.

The UC Davis research on seaweed feed found that it reduced methane emissions by up to 82%. This indicates that the farm’s organic milk will have a lower environmental effect.

When Blue Ocean Barns’ production ramps up in the following months, the farm anticipates that all of its dairy animals will be given the new seaweed supplement.

“By the end of this year, this dairy will have the same or lower carbon footprint as any plant-based dairy alternative,” Straus said.

Kebreab and animal science specialists in the lab continue to examine what else may be utilised in the battle against climate change, including various additives like almond husks and more, using a machine created to imitate what occurs in a cow’s stomach.

“There’s no better feeling than seeing all of this work being done and implemented in the real world and in scenarios all over the world,” Kebreab added.

It’s a step in the right path to strive for what can be done to reverse mankind’s influence on Mother Nature.

UC Davis researchers are also conducting experiments at a ranch in Montana to evaluate methane emissions from beef cattle.

Straus Creamery believes that by the end of the decade, all 11 of its milk suppliers will be feeding their calves a seaweed diet and will be carbon neutral.

4 ways precision agriculture is transforming dairy farming

The use of precision agriculture is bringing about a number of changes in the dairy farming industry, including the following:

  1. Improving Productivity: Technologies for precision agriculture, such as sensors, global positioning systems (GPS), and drones, may be used to gather data on the conditions of soil and crops, as well as on the health and behaviour of animals. These data may be put to use to enhance the management of herds, agricultural production, and the usage of resources, which will ultimately result in increased productivity and cost savings.
  2. Improving Animal Health: Technologies used in precision agriculture may also be used to monitor the health and behaviour of dairy cows. This gives farmers the ability to spot potential health problems early on and deliver remedies that are more specific to the problem. This has the potential to result in improved animal wellbeing, increased milk production, and less use of antibiotics.
  3. Minimising the Impact on the Environment: Precision agriculture may assist farmers in lowering their environmental impact by improving nutrient management, lowering the amount of fertiliser and pesticides used, and minimising the amount of soil erosion that occurs. This might lead to an improvement in water quality, a reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases, and an operation that is more sustainable overall.
  4. Improving the Quality of Milk: Not only can precision agriculture assist farmers in improving the quality of their milk, but it can also assist farmers in recognising problems with cow health, nutrition, or milking practises. The quantity and quality of milk produced as well as the amount of food thrown away might both improve as a consequence of this.

In general, precision agriculture is revolutionising dairy farming by providing farmers with improved data and tools that enable them to manage their operations in a manner that is more effective, profitable, and environmentally friendly.

Lock-up time and dairy productivity

In a new study, Texas A&M University researchers discovered that keeping cows in self-locking head stanchions for extended periods of time had a negative impact on dairy cow performance.

Lock-up time is the amount of time an animal spends restrained or locked into a head stanchion per day, which is typically found at dairy farm feed bunks. Dairy cattle are confined on a regular basis for pregnancy testing, artificial insemination, veterinary treatments and examinations, vaccinations, heat detection, and feeding.

However, it has been discovered that using a head lock as a method of restraint can have a negative impact on an individual animal’s well-being and productive performance within a herd, especially if the system is used outside of the normal management routine.

According to studies, when this management practise is not followed correctly and cows are restrained for extended periods of time (>4 hours daily), the animals experience varying levels of stress, which can jeopardise their production, health, and welfare.

Researchers investigated the effects of prolonged or extended lock-up time in dairy cattle in this study.
Milk production effects

Reduced milk production in cows is common when lock-up time exceeds 4 hours, according to observations from various studies. Scientists from the University of Cambridge discovered that when cows are deprived of feeding and lying for more than 4 hours during hoof trimming, milk yield is reduced by 2 litres per day for 3 days.

Stress is linked to longer periods of lock-up time. According to research, stress alters mammary homeostasis in dairy cows. It has been proposed that the stress caused by a prolonged lock-up time may result in suboptimal performance of alveoli in the mammary gland, resulting in decreased milk yield, increased mastitis incidence, and lower milk quality.

A similar study on the effects of lying or standing on mammary blood flow in dairy cows found that lying time resulted in 24% more blood flow to the mammary glands due to cardiovascular homoeostasis caused by gravity. As a result, decreased lying time as a result of prolonged lock-up time may be another explanation for the decrease in daily milk yield in dairy cattle.

Cow protection

Recent research has linked headlock restraint for more than 4 hours per day to increased aggression in dairy cattle. This aggressive behaviour was discovered to be the result of frustration or discomfort experienced during the restraint period. Aggressive behaviour in dairy cows has been linked to lower reproductive performance, including lower conception rates for heifers at first service, according to a recent study.

When compared to cows in an extended lock-up period, normal herd management increased the amount of time cows spent lying, self-grooming, ruminating, and eating. The altered time budget management as a result of longer lock-up time (>4h) has an impact on overall daily cow behaviour. In another study, the authors discovered that cows who were denied lying for 2 hours lost their feeding time for the next 24 hours, whereas cows who were denied lying for 4 hours required 41 hours to regain their feeding time.

Lameness and heat exhaustion

Lameness is a serious problem on dairy farms all over the world, and studies show that longer lockup times may exacerbate the problem. Although studies examining the direct relationship between lock-up times and lameness are lacking, some research work suggests the possibility of the effect.

Researchers discovered that cows exposed to narrow feed alleys and obstructed lunge space, resulting in increased cow standing, were more prone to lameness in their study published in the Journal of Dairy Science. According to another study, longer lock-up time contributes to deviations from the regular daily time budget, indicating variability in lying time and lying bouts that predispose cows to lameness. However, researchers recommend that the potential direct link between extended lock-up time and lameness be investigated further.

Furthermore, studies found that extended lock-up time (>4h) was more detrimental in hotter temperatures than in mild temperatures due to the additive effect of restraint stress and heat stress, implying that it is more critical to minimise lock-up time in extreme heat environments to reduce the detrimental effects of these stressors.

Cow in transition

During the transition period, the cows require more lock-up time. Cows change their behaviour during the transition period, which is defined as the three weeks before and three weeks after calving. The transition period is a critical period in the life of a dairy cow because of the animal’s susceptibility to disease and the nutritional, physiological, and social changes that occur around the time of calving.

However, because of the need to closely monitor the animal for post-calving evaluations and treatment of health disorders, dairy cows in the transition period are more prone to longer headlock times. As a result, transition cow stressors should be limited, and lock-up management routines should be closely monitored for the effects on the transition cow’s time budget and cow comfort.

What is the ideal time for head lock-up?

The head lock-up time studies fall short of defining the appropriate time without causing health and production issues. Several studies have found that keeping cows in self-locking head stanchions for an extended period of time (>4 hours per day) can have a negative impact on dairy cow performance. The emphasis should be on properly managing the farm by limiting restraint time to less than 4 hours per day and avoiding the use of headlocks during the late morning and afternoon hours of the summer months.

Mitch Theurer and Mike Brad, dairy consultants affiliated with the Standard Nutrition Company, recommended the following lock-up times in their report focusing on factors that limit cows’ time budget:

  • Lock-up times should be kept to a maximum of two hours.
  • Schedule lockup times to coincide with feedings and push cows to the bunk, rather than setting the locks 3 hours before the event.
  • During lock-up, always keep plenty of fresh feed on hand.

Researchers proposed future research work to focus on the effects of different lock-up times on the health and production of dairy cows in order to better appropriate lock-up time.

Farm business advancement is aided by genomic data.

One south west Victorian dairy farming family has found it easier to decide which animals to keep in their milking herd.

They are making more informed and confident breeding, culling, and bull selection decisions as a result of the addition of genomic testing.

Dale and Karen Angus, Ondit dairy farmers, began genomic testing their young stock four years ago and believe it will improve their business bottom line because of its ability to improve their genetic base across their herd.

“From a genetic standpoint, genomic testing allows us to make informed, data-supported decisions about who stays and who goes,” Karen explained.

Dale’s visual assessment of the animals is used to make the final decision, which is based on genomic data.

Dale and Karen milk 400 autumn-calving Holstein cows in a grazing-based system north of Colac.

When the Angus family participated in the Dairy Australia Focus Farm programme, they were introduced to genomic testing.

They were intrigued at the time by how other farmers chose heifers for the export market.

What began as a “casual lunchtime discussion” evolved into an important part of their farm and a factor in their business’s growth.

The latter benefit is attributed to making more informed decisions with the genomic data to which they have access.

Thanks to genomic data “taking away the guesswork,” Karen and Dale have also felt more empowered in discussions with breeding advisors.

“This year and last year, we’ve developed a much broader understanding of genetics, and it’s helped us make decisions about the bulls we use,” Karen said.

“We understand the data a lot more, opposed to having catalogues put in front of us. We make our own choices. It’s our company, and we need to feel comfortable and confident in every decision.”

When selecting bulls and evaluating heifers, the Angus use DataGene’s Balanced Performance Index (BPI) and consider several animal traits such as fertility, milk fat and protein percentage, yield, and survival.

The BPI has the “most weighting,” but fertility comes in second.

“We rank them first by BPI and then look at individual traits,” Karen explained.

“We’ve been trying to improve fertility in our herd since we started on our own seven years ago.”

In practise, this means that if two high BPI animals had a “toss-up,” the one with the higher fertility would be chosen.

They believe that as more of the milking herd is tested, the information generated by genomic testing will inform more of their breeding decisions.

“Genetics may be a small part of our business, but the one percenters often determine how profitable and sustainable our business is,” Karen explained.

Nearly 20% of heifers fail second lactation.

According to research, nearly one-fifth of milking heifers do not reach their second lactation – the point at which they would recoup their rearing costs.

Reading University researchers discovered that 17% of milking heifers leave the herd before their second lactation for a variety of reasons that vary from farm to farm.

They discovered that fertility, feed, health, housing, and grouping decisions had a significant impact on their longevity with the herd.

einsteineruploading up to get together with. In-calf heifers require special attention because the soft tissues of the sole inside the hoof are thinnest in young animals and around calving, increasing her risk of sole bruising.

According to the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB), reducing stress and disease gives heifers the best chance of calving a second time. In addition to lowering costs (heifer rearing is the second-highest annual expense after feed), it will increase herd longevity, reduce the farm’s carbon footprint, and improve consumer perception of dairy farming.
ALSO READ: The Benefits and Drawbacks of Extended Lactation in Dairy Cattle

The cow reaches her peak milk production approximately 3-6 weeks after parturition, and then the yield gradually declines. Lactation lasts 305 days on average. Nonetheless, as demand for milk and other dairy products rises, many farmers are looking for ways to boost production and profitability. One strategy that has gained popularity in recent years is extended lactation, which has both advantages and disadvantages. Continue reading…
Top heifer advice

The following are some helpful hints for transitioning heifers into the calving herd:

  • Train heifers to the parlour
  • Make sure the calving pen is in a quiet area.
  • After calving, provide them with pain relief.
  • Keep an eye out for clinical and subclinical milk fever, ketosis, and displaced abomasum. 21-30 days post-calving
  • Maintain dry matter intake during transition Monitor body condition score and rumen fill Allow adequate feed space and push up feed at least 4-6 times per day Allow adequate lying space of at least one cubicle per heifer/per 10 square metres in a loose yard
  • Reduce soil stress by limiting group changes.
  • Make sure your heifers are not lame.

The AHDB is holding farmer meetings across the country to teach them how to improve a heifer’s chances of calving a second time. The first meetings will take place on March 21 in Preston, Lancashire, and Denbighshire, Wales, and will continue until March 31.

Farmers will learn more about the economic benefits of optimising the performance of their milking heifers, the latest on the effects of social stress and monitoring the various transitions, and the benefits of anti-inflammatories at calving at the events. Case studies from several commercial farms will be available.

Dairy calves benefit greatly from social interaction with humans.

The welfare of calves, including their physical and emotional health, is always top of mind for those in the dairy industry, especially during the weaning stage. Researchers from the University of Florida demonstrated that socialisation with other calves and humans, even for as little as five minutes, can improve overall calf well-being in a recent study published in JDS Communications®, published by Elsevier.

According to lead researcher Emily K. Miller-Cushon, PhD, of the University of Florida Department of Animal Sciences in Gainesville, FL, USA, assessing how a calf is feeling is usually done by observing behaviours, particularly abnormal behaviours such as “sucking or chewing on their housing pens or bedding, on their pen-mates or human handlers—all of which are common in the period after calves are fed.” These types of behaviours are generally regarded as signs of frustration and can have an impact on the health of calves.

“Because calves are active and seek stimulation after milk-feeding, providing more activities, such as brushing, may calm calves, reducing sucking behaviours after feeding and increasing rest,” Miller-Cushon explained.

Because previous research has shown that calves seek human contact, the researchers set out to discover how the human-animal relationship might influence these sucking behaviours. To find out, the researchers randomly assigned 28 Holstein heifer calves to either individual or paired housing from birth to seven weeks old, and they standardised their contact with humans during this time to include feeding and health exams. The calves began weaning at six weeks of age, and the researchers introduced additional human contact and continuously video-recorded its effects on behaviour over a four-day study period during weaning. During this time, each calf had two days of normal human contact and two days of experimental human contact, which included an extra five minutes of neck scratches with their familiar human handlers.

Why do people scratch their necks? “Previous research has shown that calves enjoy tactile contact, including brushing from humans. “This type of contact can lower their heart rates, and calves lean into the scratches and stretch out their necks for more,” Miller-Cushon explained. “We also notice that calves suck on the pen less when there is a stationary brush against which they can rub.”

After reviewing the video recordings, the research team concluded that human contact influences calf behaviour and promotes calm and well-being. The five minutes spent with humans reduced the duration of the calves’ sucking behaviours and increased the amount of rest they received after meals. This reduction in sucking behaviour was especially noticeable in calves housed alone versus those with a pen-mate, indicating the importance of socialisation not only with humans but also with other calves.

Miller-Cushon was careful to point out that the study’s human contact did not completely eliminate sucking behaviours: “Our findings showed benefits of human contact, but the results also suggest that our work in finding the most beneficial and natural methods of feeding and housing our dairy calves is not done.”

–Elsevier

Farming shows the value of virtual fencing

Tim Cronshaw writes that a couple in North Canterbury has signed up their large dairy herd for high-tech collars and farming without fences.

Emlyn Francis, a farmer in Culverden, likes to say that the GPS collars on his dairy cows are the way of the future.

As he walks toward a group of people with collars sitting around a water tank, he points to fences in the distance.

Virtual technology, which is being used by a small but growing number of farmers across the country, has almost made them obsolete.

The cows are happy to graze in their small area, which has no visible edges.

Mr. Francis finds this interesting because he grew up in a time when the only chips in a car were thrown all over the back seat.

In June, he and his wife Hilary put solar-powered Halter smart collars on 250 of their winter-milking cows. By the end of the month, they had put them on all 1,500 cows in their dairy herd.

Keeping good employees was one of the most important parts of using the technology.

“I’m a sucker for a glossy brochure, but I also see the benefits of labour efficiencies and staff engagement,” he said.

“Young people are pretty good with their phones, so if they can move the cows, bring the cows in, do farm work, or anything else while they’re on their phones, that’s great. Since we have Halter, they are all very interested in it.”

The collars were made by a tech company in New Zealand. They have a simple app that helps farmers move cows without using fences, wires, motorbikes, gates, or dogs.

When a cow gets close to or goes over a virtual fence, it makes a noise, and a vibration lets it know it’s on the right path. If a cow goes in the wrong direction, the collar sends out a “low-energy pulse” using technology that the AgResearch Animal Ethics Committee has approved.

The Francis family found that their herd knew how to find the virtual fences by the second day.

When a mistake was made and someone put a collar on backwards, people learned quickly.

“When you put them on, they have to be on the right way, because the idea is that if they turn left, it makes a noise, a vibration, or a zap. If you put it on the wrong way, it tells her to go left instead of right, which really confuses them.

“One would go in the wrong direction and not know why.”

He had even heard of smart cows that learned to back through a feed break to get to a tasty treat, but for the most part, it worked well and helped their business.

The system moves the cows automatically and tracks how they graze each day so farmers can keep track and change their feed. They get advanced heat detection and health alerts to help them have more calves.

Mr. Francis liked the idea that he could sit in the kitchen and use his smart phone to keep track of their herd.

Friends came over for coffee the other day and watched as they sat around the table and moved the cows by drawing on the phone.

With a quick swipe, you can open an app that shows each cow in every paddock as a small white circle. With another click on the button, their information is shown.

So that cow over there, in the circle, is number 1344, he said. She was last bred on December 8. She is ruminating, moving up a little bit today and down a little bit today, but it’s still early in the day, as shown by the graphs of her movement and grazing. It doesn’t eat, but ruminating can be used as a stand-in for eating.

“I haven’t done it yet, but I’d like to get a mob with high average ruminating and try to feed them more. If they’re ruminating more, they’re probably eating more, and it would be good to use that to get the super tankers together.”

Scroll Media ads

0 minutes of 0 minutes

Volume 0%

The couple also liked that Halter was based in New Zealand and had people there who could be reached if there were any problems.

Mrs. Francis said that at first they were interested in the Allflex collars for health and heat detection, but then they started looking at other things.

She said, “At first, we were looking at the other collars.”

“So while we were doing that, we thought, ‘Why not look at the Halter collar, just to see what it’s all about?’ We didn’t really think we’d join.

The benefits of moving cows virtually and putting up virtual fences were enough to win them over.

Mr. Francis said that they were using a lot less fuel because “guys aren’t sitting behind cows,” so they rode their motorcycles less.

He thought that this could save about 1,000 travel hours a year if it only took three hours a day to get the cows in.

“We need better productivity, a better rate of calves born within six weeks, less waste, and all these other things. So the savings won’t pay for it on their own, and you need productivity and small improvements to make it work.

Trying to get a large herd to give birth is hard, and even with a camera that could tell when cows were in heat, time was still spent watching the cows. They thought it would be better to find a way to automate it.

The Halter app tracks a cow’s movements. If a cow was in heat, it probably ate less, moved around more, and had a faster heart rate.

Mr. Francis said, “The algorithms and AI build up a picture of a normal pattern of movement.”

“So, when she’s on heat, that will change every three weeks, and all of these things will go up. That gives you a number and lets you know she’s armed and dangerous.”

At first, they had to manually enter the heat numbers into Protrack. But because Halter made a deal with LIC, the information about mating can now be linked to the farm automation software, which is a big plus.

Mr. Francis was sure that they grew more grass in the spring because every pasture break was back-fenced and the herd only ate where it was supposed to. This was hard to prove, though.

“It’s still early, and we’re having trouble getting water sometimes, but we’re on track to make more money per cow. As long as we can keep it together from here on out, we should be fine and should be able to get 25–30 kg more milk per cow than we did last year. These are small improvements.

“That’s good for the environment because it means we have fewer cows. We’re already 2% ahead and have 100 fewer cows than we did last year.”

Less work has to be done, which is another good thing.

Mrs. Francis said that their staff probably worked 45 hours a week in the spring, compared to 50 hours a week when milking was at its busiest, but that they were now only working 40 hours.

She said that because they saw more of their friends and family, they were happier people.

There are pros and cons to every new thing on a farm.

When they cut their team from nine people to seven during the busy summer, those who are left will probably have to do more milking. The staff are getting up an hour later in the mornings because there are fewer cows and less work to do by hand.

On their Kenmare Dairy farm, the only animals that don’t have collars are 20 beef animals that are free to roam and cut the grass.

Kenmare is in the middle of the Amuri Basin. Since modern irrigation came along a few decades ago, the Amuri Basin has become a large dairy farming area.

In 1995, Mrs. Francis’s father started the first Kenmare farm on a piece of the property that has since grown to 630ha.

Send this to a friend