Payday Loans Payday Loans

Archive for Dairy Cattle Classification

Is Type Classification Still Important?

Monday, April 8th, 2013

There are many changes going on in the dairy industry these days. Producers must try to understand what programs are worth still participating in and what ones to drop. At the Bullvine we have had some producers ask, “Should I still classify my cows?” To that we say a resounding, “YES!”  The following article explains why.

First, I would be remiss if I did not disclose that my father ran the Type Classification program here in Canada for 18 years, before it passed into the very capable hands of Jay Shannon and Tom Byers. I was raised understanding type classification and how the system works.  From when Dad and the late Dalton Hodgins first started playing with the handheld units to when it was time to update the True Type Model, you could say that classification was bred into me.   For me to even have to consider whether the program has merit is a very challenging situation.  But when a breeder from California asked me the other day, “Why should I still type classify?”  this caused me to stop and think about that, as I didn’t have an instant answer for him.  So, in typical Bullvine fashion, I did some more thinking about it, a little bit of research and here is what I came up with.

Why Type Classify if you Genomic Test All Your Females?

Tom Byers said it best, in our interview a year ago. “Classification will be the conformation verification of our Genomic selected sires.” (Read more: Tom Byers – “That’s classified”).  Genomics is not a perfect science and, in order to improve the accuracy of the genomic predictions, we need a larger data set.  That means we need more daughters classified by these new genomic sires so that the geneticists can compare the genomic predictions of these sires to the actual performance of their daughters. Only then can the geneticists improve the formulations so their predictions become more accurate.  Currently you can feel about 95% confident that a sire will come within 10% of their genomic prediction. With more information, that rate of confidence will increase while the range will decrease.

It’s also important to understand how these sires work in your herd.  I cannot tell you the number of times I have seen some sires work wonders in some herds and totally fail in others. While the sire’s proof may average out over all herds, that does not mean he or his blood lines will work well in yours.  That is why you still need programs like type classification and milk recording to validate that what you see on paper (genomic tests) is what you actually get in reality.

Why Classification is More Important than Ever When Marketing Your Cattle

It used to be that when a fresh 2 year old went Very Good many breeders wanted to see her picture to see if she really was a VG 2 year old.  Often times it was felt that maybe that animal got a gift and maybe would have only been a GP84 in a different herd.  Nowadays, with the state of dairy cattle photo ethics the way it is, I actually jump back to the classification to see if the picture really resembles the animal.

When I look at the picture and the heifer looks VG87+ but yet she is only classified VG85, I wonder why.  Often I notice that animal may only be a 2 or 3 for loin strength, yet in her picture with all the “hair” added she looks closer to a 9.  This causes a drastic change to the general appearance of the animal and greatly misrepresents her rump.  That is why now, more than ever, I look at the full classification breakdown in order to get a better understanding of just what the animal looks like.

Another area I often notice is size and stature.  With so many pictures having the original background removed and often the leadsperson as well, it is hard to get an accurate reference for the exact size of the animal.  When the photographer or graphic designer is adding in the new background, they are doing so by what makes the animal look the best.  While this is considered acceptable by today’s standards, it can greatly misrepresent the size and stature of the animal. (Read more: Has Photo Enhancement Gone Too Far?).

Another area where it is impossible to get an accurate read is heel depth and angularity.  Because these animals are being cropped out of their original images, often they lose some of the depth of heal in the picture as well as their necks get accidentally cleaned up.  While I do not think most photographers do so intentionally, the programs they are using combined with photographer’s Photoshop skills often cause some of these parts to be cropped, leaving a shallower foot and a cleaner head and neck.  It is for these reasons we have recently started the Dairy Cattle Marketer’s Code of Ethics (Read more: Introducing The Dairy Marketing Code of Conduct) in order to help re-establish credibility in dairy cattle photographs.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

There is no question that the industry is changing at a very rapid rate.  For some it`s not changing fast enough. For others, it seems too fast.  While all programs need to evolve to meet the needs of the modern dairy producer, there is no question that a dynamic Type Classification program has its place.  Since genomics is not a perfect science, and some dairy cattle photographs do not tell the full story, type classification remains the one constant for identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the individual, so that we can correctively mate to help the next generation function best in the different environments we ask her to work in. This combination of science and cow sense is what will lead us into a very prosperous future.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Cow Mobility: One Step Forward or Two Steps Back?

Wednesday, March 27th, 2013

The udder may be a cow’s most prized physical asset, but her feet and legs literally provide the support for everything she does. How many situations with problem cows boil down to problems with their feet and legs?

In most herds foot care and hoof trimming are considered to be a very necessary event and, therefore, an expense that cannot be avoided. With this absolute in mind, we tend to march on breeding, feeding and managing cows without taking the time to consider ways to stop merely treating the symptoms we`re stuck with. Solving the problem before it becomes a health or management problem could completely avoid starting our animals off on the wrong foot. The Bullvine invites you to consider the genetics of feet and legs with us to stimulate a breeding solution for these issues.

The Heels of a Dilemma

In milk recorded herds, culling cows for feet and leg problems is #1 on the list of conformation culling reasons. In the past, udder breakdown was once the leader. However breeders have placed sufficient emphasis on improving udders that we are now to the stage where milk producers are saying they do not need to select bulls for udder traits except to avoid ones that are too deep.  It’s encouraging to know that with focus and time identified problems can be solved.

Although removal of horns may be the current hot button for people concerned about the welfare of animals, and therefore breeders are selecting for polled, there are numerous reports predicting that lame cows will be the next and much larger target.

Certainly, there are no dairypersons who are saying that feet and legs are good enough that genetic improvement for feet and legs is not needed.

Locomotion is Costing Us an Arm and a Leg

Reports show that for a cow with one temporary sore foot it reduces her annual profit by at least $100.  So what is the cost of a cow with foot construction that requires trimming 3-5 times per year, medication, less milk production, milk withdrawal, extended calving interval and premature culling? Feet and leg problems could be costing some herds $300 per cow per year.  On a one hundred cow herd that is $30,000 less profit. Significant by anyone’s standard.

A Vet Looks at the Genetics of Lameness

Gordon Atkins, DVM and a member of Holstein Canada’s Type Classification Advisory Committee, was a speaker at the recent annual meeting of the Wisconsin Holstein Association. He is not prepared to accept the fact that feet and leg heritabilities are as low as they currently appear to be.  Additionally, he shared some interesting facts about feet and legs:

  • Lameness is 88% a rear foot situation
  • That leaves only 12% for it being a front feet and leg problem
  • The outside rear claws bear the brunt of the lameness issue
  • The fact is that the rear outside claw grows faster because it is growing tissue in response to the greater pressure it endures while walking
  • Thin cows have a higher incidence of lameness
  • Thin cows mobilized fat from their bodies including the fat from the foot pad or digital cushion within the base of the heel structure. This results in less protection for the foot and heel.
  • The foot’s fatty pad can be replaced as the cow regains body condition but over time scar tissue will form when adequate fat is not present in the pads

Dr Atkins went on to highlight

  • His very telling statement followed, that being, “we need to evaluate feet and legs better”

 

Diagram – cross section of the foot

Diagram – Cross Section of a Bovine Foot

Let`s Go Toe to Toe with the Facts Only Please

Let’s summarize:

  • Dairy cattle have a genetic problem relative to feet and legs especially for animals not allowed to get off cement or to exercise
  • It is rear feet that are the major portion of the problem with respect to lameness

The Achilles Heel for Classifiers

The classification system scores numerous traits but there are factors in the area of feet and legs that are beyond their control.  Foot angle is not a good trait to measure because it is so variable due to foot trimming. Cattle owners have feet trimmed before classification so type classifiers do not see the animals in their natural state.  Classifiers do the best they can, given the circumstances. Add to this the fact that classifiers do not see every cow walking. Since the ability to walk is what is most important, classifiers again are at a distinct disadvantage.

Estimating heritability using classification data shows these percentages:

  • 30% for bone quality (moderate)
  • 24% for rear legs side view (moderate)
  • 13% for rear legs rear view (low)
  • 11% for foot angle (low)
  • 8% for heel depth (low)

Yes the report card is in – we need to improve the evaluation feet and legs especially for rear feet and rear legs rear view. Genetically we have bred for thin cows and thus less fat in the foot pad. The only place we collect feet and leg data for genetic purposes is in the type classification programs and there the classifier, as mentioned, is at a disadvantage. What’s left that breeds, classifiers, people doing the genetic evaluations and breeders can do?

Getting a Toehold on the Solution

A collective approach is needed:

  1. We must admit that we have a problem and that we need to find a solution to more accurately knowing the genetics of feet and legs.
  2. The problem is not limited to one country and it is more prevalent in cattle not allowed to walk on natural surfaces.
  3. Resources (people and money) must be allocated to investigation and research.

Some suggestions the Bullvine has heard on ideas to consider include:

  • observe or measure the females over their lifetime
  • evaluate the feet on calves at weaning
  • evaluate the feet on heifers at first breeding
  • measure the feet on first lactation females on their first milk recording test day (before they are trimmed)
  • compare sire’s daughter feet and legs on confined versus pastured daughters
  • compare the genomic profiles of cow families that are both desirable and undesirable for feet (and legs)

It is encouraging to see that there is one hoof trimmers’ guild that has public support for a study to collect pedigree information at the time of trimming, to complete a report of the condition of the feet before trimming and then to have the data analyzed. That could be a start.

In the Interim… Feet Forward

Research takes time and cows are bred every day, in the mean time, breeders must use the information currently available from sire indexes or proofs. It is strongly recommended that sires be highly ranked for Net Merit, TPI or LPI and higher than 1.5 FLC or +7 Feet & Legs. A recent addition to the information to consider on bulls is their Body Condition Scoring index. Bulls whose daughters do not get as thin during lactation should not drain all the fat from their foot pads.  (Some Bullvine recommended sires to use can be found at From Fantasy To Reality – Top Sires To Address Herd Culling Problems)

The Bullvine Bottom Line- “Stop “Digging in Our Heels”

What is needed is an international approach to studying dairy cattle feet, much like the approach being taken to studying feed efficiency.  Hopefully a way will be found to move feet research in dairy cattle to the DNA level. If the industry collectively has the will, there will be a way. All we need now is a champion to take the first step.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

 

SANDY-VALLEY BOLT SHEILA now EX-92
Sandy-Valley Farms, Scandinavia, Wisconsin,  classified March 11th with the following results:
  • SANDY-VALLEY BOLT SHEILA EX-92 95 FL EX-MS @ 6-0
    (Bolton x 87 Forbidden x 89 BWM x 87 Rudolph x Tesk Della)
    Sheila is the dam of Planet Sapphire VG-87-2YR, who has 2 sons in the top 50 GTPI bulls and granddaughters up to over 2600G
  • SANDY-VALLEY JETSTR TAVI EX-92 93-MS @ 4-7
    (Jetstream x 92 Manager x 91 Finley x 88 Convincer x 93 Terry Tory)
  • SANDY-VALLEY BOLTO TASHA EX-91 92-MS @ 4-5
    (Bolton x EX Juror Ford x 87 Rudolph x EX Tesk Della)
  • SANDY-VALLEY STO ALANDRA EX-91 @ 4-4
    (Stol Joc x EX Shottle Aloshi x 87 Champion x 92 BWM)
  • SANDY-VALLEY MAC SHELBY EX-91 @ 5-5
    (Mac x 88 Shottle x EX Finley x 92 Rudolph Missy)
  • SANDY-VALLEY SANDY DAISY VG-88 EX-MS @ 3-10
    (Sandy x Shottle Dalashi 94 x Champion Dellia EX-91 x Patron Debbie Jo 92)
  • WINTERLANCE STOL JOC MIA VG-88 EX-MS @ 4-5)
    (Stol Joc x VG Goldwyn x 88 Outside x Ravens)
  • SANDY-VALLEY DRCY SHAMAY *TY VG-87 VG-MS @ 2-7
    (Dorcy x 88 Shottle x EX Finley x 92 Rudolph Missy)
  • LARCREST CAKE VG-86 86-MS @ 2-8
    (+2398G Super x Shottle Cosmopolitan 87 x Outside Champagne EX)
  • SANDY-VALLEY SUPER BEYLA VG-86 VG-MS @ 2-10
    (Super x Shottle Brynna 91 x Durham Barbie 92)
  • SANDY-VALLEY SUPER BITSY VG-85 86-MS @ 2-6
    (+221G Super x Ramos Brylliant 86 x Shottle Brynna 91)
  • SANDY-VALLEY FRD SHERYNN VG-85 VG-MS @ 2-6
    (Freddie x 88 Shottle x EX Finley x 92 Rudolph Missy)
  • SANDY-VALLEY FREDDI GIFT GP-83 VG-MS @ 2-5
    (+2218G Freddie x Planet Gobea 87 x Shottle Goldy 87
  • SANDY-VALLEY NIAGR AGNES GP-83 VG-MS @ 2-5
    (Niagra x 83 Roumare x 86 Potter x 89 BWM)

Read more about Sandy-Valley in our recent interview with them

Redman Rally-Red  now EX-91 2E @ 7-01 (Nominated All-American R&W Aged Cow 2012)

Redman Rally-Red now EX-91 2E @ 7-01 (Nominated All-American R&W Aged Cow 2012)

Ryan, Karen, Curtis & Evelyn Griffin of Thief River Falls, MN are excited to share the following results from their Holstein classification! They report that it was -10 degrees outside and even -26 two days before, but things were much warmer inside the barn as their exciting day resulted in new herd totals of 4 EX, 5 VG (all 1st lact) and 2 GP (all Red or *RC)!  They are very excited as their BAA is sure to go up from 110.1 in 2012!

Highlights Included:

  • Redman Rally-Red  now EX-91 2E @ 7-01 (Nominated All-American R&W Aged Cow 2012)
  • Advent Sara-Red now EX-92 2E @ 7-06 (Res. Grand Champion, National R&W Convention Show 2011)
  • Redliner Sugar-Red  permanent EX-90 @ 5-06 (dry Redliner x Advent Sara)
  • Goldwyn Silhouette *RC  EX 90 @ 3-08 (2nd Lact. Goldwyn x Advent Sara)
  • Contender Shawna-Red VG-87 EX-MS @ 2-08 (Contender x All-American Nominee Redliner Shania x All-American Nominee Advent Sheena)
  • Contender Laurel-Red VG-86 @ 2-10 (Res. All-MN R&W Jr. 2-Year-Old 2012)
  • Debonair Josefina-Red VG-85 (Debonair x EX Rubens x Redmarker Jena)

Quality Goldwyn Flansco now EX-95-6Y

Thursday, November 29th, 2012

Quality Goldwyn Flansco

Quality Goldwyn Flansco now EX-95-6Y (CAN). 1st 3rd Generation EX-95 or higher CDN cow. Read more about Flansco and her breeders -http://www.thebullvine.com/breeder-profiles/quality-holsteins-well-deserved-congratulations/

SANDY-VALLEY OUTSIDE ARA now EX-93

SANDY-VALLEY OUTSIDE ARA now EX-93

Sandy-Valley Farms, classified recently with the following results:

  • SANDY-VALLEY OUTSIDE ARA EX-93, EX-MS @ 8-00
    [Outside x VG89 BWM x VG87 Rudolph Tatum]
  • SANDY-VALLEY RAMOS BRYSK EX-91, EX-MS@ 5-02
    [Ramos x EX-91 Shottle Brynna x EX92 Durham Barbie]
  • SANDY-VALLEY LB SHILOH-P EX91, EX-MS @4-05
    [Lawn Boy x VG89 Sept Storm x EX93 Terry Tory]
  • SANDY-VALLEY MAC LYDIA VG88, EX-MS @ 4-08
    [Mac x Ex90 Lynch x EX92 Mathie]
  • SANDY-VALLEY MANO BRYDAN VG-88, VG-MS @ 2-08
    [MOM X EX-91 Shottle Brynna x EX92 Durham Barbie]
  • LARCREST CINNAMON VG-87, VG-MS @ 5-01
    [Ramos x EX90 Oside Champagne x EX94 Juror]
  • SANDY-VALLEY PLANET TRESS VG-87, VG-MS @ 3-08
    [Planet x EX91 Laudan x VG87 BWM]
  • SANDY-VALLEY DRCY SHAMAY VG-86, VG-MS @ 2-03
    [Dorcy x VG-87 Shottle x EX-90 Finley]
  • SANDY-VALLEY SUPER BRAYVA VG-85, VG-MS @2-02
    [Super x VG86 Ramos x EX91 Shottle Brynna]
  • LARCREST CAKE VG-85, VG-MS @ 2-04
    [Super x VG-87 Shottle Cosmopolitan]

Visit their website for the latest photos and genomic results

A total of 4 new Excellents & 13 Excellents with Multiple “E”s

Earning Multiple “E”s

  • Ploegsway Gibson Electric – EX-94-5E-11Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill I T Rae – EX-93-3E-7Y (CAN)
  • Moneden Terrason Carmen – EX-93-5E-9Y (CAN)
  • Cavendish Ionic Zoe – EX-93-3E-8Y (CAN)
  • Holywell Progress Risingstar – EX-92-7E-11Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Derry Soleil – EX-92-5E-9Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Lheros Amanda – EX-90-3E-6Y (CAN)
  • Priority Dundee Lolli Pop – EX-90-3E-6Y (CAN)
  • Vioris Windstar Mix – EX-90-3E-8Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Adition Carly – EX-90-2E-6Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Metro Sally – EX-90-2E-6Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Terrason Seven Up – EX-90-2E-6Y (CAN)
  • Mallettdale Champion Delta – EX-90-2E-6Y (CAN)

First Time Excellents

  • Breeze Hill Fortune Daytona – EX-91-4Y (CAN)
  • Bashlee Decker Delight – EX-90-4Y (CAN)
  • Breeze Hill Carisma Sobriety – EX-90-5Y (CAN)
  • Regan-ALH B Evanna-ET – EX-90-4Y (CAN

Cookiecutter Holsteins of Hudson Falls, NY recently had an outstanding classification with daughters and full sisters to Cookiecutter Gld Holler-ET VG-88 DOM.

  • Cookiecutter Sht Hollerwood was raised to EX-90  (Shottle x VG-88 Goldwyn Holler back to EX-95 Dellia)
  • Cookiecutter MOM Halo was raised to VG-88 EX-MS (Man Oman x VG-88 Goldwyn Holler back to EX-95 Dellia)
  • Cookiecutter MM Hallmark went VG-86 87-MS (Man Oman x VG-88 Goldwyn Holler back to EX-95 Dellia)
  • Full sisters to Holler
    • Cookiecutter Goldwyn Hackney is now EX-91 EX-MS
    • Cookiecutter Goldwyn Horizon is now 2E-91
    • Cookiecutter Goldwyn Heather is now 2E-92 EX-MS
Irwindale Leduc Macy is now EX-95-4E-12 Years

Irwindale Leduc Macy is now EX-95-4E-12 Years

Irwindale Leduc Macy is now EX-95-4E-12 Years (CAN) as of yesterday 10/19/12

Born: 09/03/00
Sire: Lystel Leduc-ET
Dam: Irwindale Encore Mandy-ET
EX-90-5Y (USA)
2nd Dam: Irwindale Counselor Marsha
EX-93-3E (USA)
3rd Dam: Edele-C Edele Mark Marie
VG-87-5Y (USA)
4th Dam: Willview Juniper Milly
EX-90-6Y (USA)

Owned by: RockyMountain Holsteins
Cochrane, Alberta, Canada

http://rockymountainholsteins.com/

&
Continental Holsteins
Leduc, Alberta, Canada

Bred by: Steven Irwin/Irwindale Holsteins
Beason, Illinois, USA

Macy has a long string of achievements:

2009
Res. Grand Champion – Calgary Spring
2nd Place Mature-Cow – Calgary Spring
1st Place Mature-Cow – Red Deer
1st Place Mature Cow – Westerner Champ.
HM. All-West – Mature-Cow

2008
1st Place Mature-Cow – Calgary Spring
All-West – Mature-Cow

2007
Res. Grand Champion – Westerner Champ.
1st Place Mature-Cow – Westerner Champ.
All-West – Mature-Cow

2006
Res. Grand Champion – Calgary Spring
Grand Champion – Westerner Champ.
1st Place 5-Year-Old – Westerner Champ.
1st Place 5-Year-Old – Saskatoon Expo
1st Place 5-Year-Old – Calgary Spring
Nom. All-Canadian 5-Year-Old

2005
1st Place 4-Year-Old – Royal Winter Fair
Grand Champion – Westerner Champ.
1st Place 4-Year-Old – Westerner Champ.
All-Canadian – 4-Year-Old

2004
Grand Champion – AB Dairy Congress
1st Place Sr. 3-Year-Old – AB Dairy Congress
Intermediate Champ. – Westerner Champ.
1st Place Sr. 3-Year-Old – Westerner Champ.

2003
1st Place Sr. 2-Year-Old – Royal Winter Fair
All-Canadian – Sr. 2-Year-Old
1st Place Sr. 2-Year-Old – Westerner Champ

APPLEVUE GOLDWYN GINA - Canada's Newest 95 point cow

APPLEVUE GOLDWYN GINA – Canada’s Newest 95 point cow

Applevue Goldwyn Gina is Canada’s newest EX-95-2E Point Holstein as of 09/26/12. Gina becomes the 8th Canadian Holstein to score EX-95 in 2012 and the 6th Braedale Goldwyn daughter to earn and retain a 95-point designation in Canada.

Born: 01/06/2006
Age at Classification: 6-Years/4th Lactation
Previous Score: EX-94-2E-5Y
Sire: Braedale Goldwyn
Dam: VG-86 (CAN)
2nd Dam: VG-87 (CAN)
3rd Dam: VG-85 (CAN)

Show Record:
NOM. ALL-QUEBEC 4-YR 2010
RES.GRAND LOTBINIERE 2012,2009
1ST MATURE COW LOTBINIERE 2012
1ST SR.3-YR LOTBINIERE 2009

Owned by: Ferme Rolandale Enr., St-Flavien, Québec, Canada http://www.rolandale.com/
Breeder: Applevue Farm, Brampton, Ontario, Canada

For a complete list of Canadian Holsteins that have earned & retained the EX-95 designation, go to… http://www.dairycowdaily.com/Excellent-95-Point-Canadian-Holsteins-By-Name.html

Rosayre BB Flip  VG-88-2yr

Rosayre BB Flip VG-88-2yr

Rosayre BB Flip – VG-88 @ 2-03 (CAN) and last year’s Royal Agricultural Winter Fair Jr. Champion is this year’s Eastern Ontario/Western Quebec Show’s Supreme Champion as a Jr. 2-Year-Old

Hoards Dairyman – Holstein Association USA classifier Willis Gunst recently attended a twilight meeting in Wisconsin to share the new classification changes with Holstein breeders and to answer questions they have on the program.

The changes were brought about by a recommendation of the Holstein Association USA’s Type Advisory Committee. It was approved and announced this summer at the national Holstein convention. The decision puts more emphasis on long-term profitability traits and penalizes 2-year olds that are over 59 inches tall and shorter than 53 inches. This in essence, makes stature at two-way trait where the extreme is not rewarded. The goal is to have a more uniform breed, which in turn makes cows able to fit their facilities and manage herd members equally.

A cow’s final score is based on five major classification categories or breakdowns of front end and capacity, dairy strength, rump, feet and legs and udder. The classifier numerically assigns each breakdown a score ranging from 1 to 100 points. The numbers are based on the level of desirability exhibited by individual cows for each category compared to the true-type model. The final score is the weighted sum of the five major breakdown scores.

The two major breakdowns affected are front end and capacity, and feet and legs. Five of the scorecard points allocated to front end and capacity have been moved to feet and legs. This makes front end and capacity at 15 percent and feet and legs at 20 points. Udder at 40 points, dairy strength at 20 points and rump at 5 points remain unchanged.

 

Type appraisal comparisons
 

The United States places much less emphasis on feet and legs as compared to other countries. Even with boosting the percentage to 20 percent, we are still behind other countries that value feet and legs as high a 35 percent of final score. Feet and legs are not as highly heritable as other body traits. Environment and herd management can impact feet and legs to a high degree, and so the Holstein leadership has chosen not to overvalue feet and legs’ genetic component.

The Holstein changes also bring their type appraisal closer to the PDCA scorecard, which was updated in April of 2009. While classification of any breed is a method to compare dairy cattle to the ideal for the breed, it is not a hard-and-fast rule to determine showring type. The two are closely correlated, but are not interchangeable.

Link to the new Holstein Association USA ‘s Linear Descriptive Traits
Link to the PDCA scorecard

LUCK-E DUNDEE JENNAThe Holstein breed welcomes yet another 95 point cow into its ranks.  Luck-E Dundee Jenna, owned by Milksource Genetics of Kaukauna is the newest EX 95 point cow in the breed.  Bred by the Engels of Hampshire, IL, Jenna is a well-know showring contender, having been nominated All-American and All-Canadian as a 4 Year Old in 2010.  In addition, Jenna was named the All-Wisconsin Aged Cow earlier this summer the Wisconsin Championship Show, as well as winning the Aged Cow Class at the 2012 Midwest Spring National.  Jenna won the 5 Year Old class at the Midwest Spring National Show in 2011, as well.  Jenna is a Regancrest Dundee daughter of an EX 91 Leduc, with the second dam being an EX Inspiration daughter.  Congratulations to Milksource on Jenna’s continuing achievements.

A New EX 95 Jersey “Impacts” RJF!

Friday, August 24th, 2012
 RJF Belle's Impact Robert & April Jarrell and family of  RJF Jerseys in Corbyville, ON are thrilled to announce that RJF Belles Impact has joined the league of EX 95Jerseys at 5 years of age!  Impact, who also has been scored 2E, is an Iatola daughter of RJF Remake Belle SUP-EX 92-5E.
In addition to Impact, other classification highlights include:
  • RJF Iatola Sadie EX 94 at 4 Years (Iatola x Piedmont Jonathans Sally EX 90 2E)
  • RJF Jade Gem EX 93 3E as an Aged Cow (Jade x RJF First Prize Georgette EX 92 6E
  • RJF Whistler Treasure EX 91 2E as an Aged Cow (Bonnyburn Ali Whistler x RJF Barber Teresa SUP EX 90 8E)
  • RJF Ressurection Bombshell EX 91 at 4 Years (Ressurection x RJF Remake Becky SUP EX 96 6E)
  • RJF Remake Belleflower EX 90 4E as an Aged Cow (Remake x RJF Star Barb)
  • Big Trouble EX 90 as an Aged Cow (RJF Big Show x RJF Premonition Tiffany EX 90 2E)
  • RJF Iatola Rascal EX 90 at 4 Years (Iatola x RJF Remake Rattle EX 90 4E)
  • RJF Iatola Cinnamon EX 90 at 4 Years (Iatola x Huronia Imp Christie EX 90 3E)
  • RJF Bella’s Jewel VG 89 as a Senior 3 Year Old (Jade x RJF Centurion Bella EX 93 2E)
  • RJF Rocket Laker VG 88 as an Aged Cow (OF Barber Rocket x Pine Creek Respect Lori)
  • RJF Big Rebound VG 86 as a Junior 3 Year Old (RJF Big Show x RJF Just Wait Raven EX 91)
  • RJF Comerica Cherish VG 86 as a Senior 2 Year Old (Comerica x Huronia Imp Christie EX 90 3E)
  • RJF Belmont Taffy VG 85 as a Junior 2 Year Old (Belmont x RJF Whistler Treasure EX 91 3E)
  • RJF Belles Freedom VG 85 as a Junior 3 Year Old (Sunset Canyon Futurity x RJF Remake Belle SUP EX 92 5E)
  • RJF Iatola Chanel GP 83 as a Junior 2 Year Old (Iatola x Huronia Imp Christie EX 90 3E
Holstein:
  • RJF Jet Daffney VG 86 as a Senior 2 Year Old

Is Good Plus Good Enough?

Thursday, May 31st, 2012

For years GP-84-2YR was the kiss of death when it came to marketing and selling genetics.  However, along comes genomics and it seems that GP is good enough.  Nevertheless, the question it has me asking is “Is Good Plus Good Enough?”

I can still remember when Summershade Icebreak Luke, was the #1 LPI cow in Canada.  The problem was she was scored GP-83-2YR.  The A.I. companies where not sure if they should even sample bulls from her and how would they convince their members to use them in their young sire programs.  Then came along Summershade Igniter and Summershade Inquirer and A.I. companies took the chance.  While hindsight is 20/20, maybe they should have passed.  On the female side, Icebreak had 34 daughters classified and only 7 of them going VG.  We ourselves had one of those daughters Summershade Icemarti.  While she did score VG, it was not until her 2nd lactation, long past her peak marketing time.  In the past, we have purchased many daughters out of GP 83 and 84 two year olds, expecting them to go VG before our purchase calved in.  It has proven to be a risky move, but one that could have paid off big time.  On the male side Icebreak had six sons enter A.I. service but none where ever returned to service.

On the flip side, I can also remember when we first purchased into the Braedale Gypsy Grand family and many people around us had concerns about her GP-83-2YR dam.  While there was a very good reason why Moonriver never went VG, we still found ourselves having to explain things many times.  Then along came Second Cut, Baler Twine, Freelance and Goodluck and we found that changed everything.

As we all know genomics has changed the name of the game, and we now see A.I. companies sampling high genomic sires irrelevant of their score or the score of their dam.  With that in mind, I decided to take a look at the current high index dams that are NOT scored VG.  The following is what I found.

The Story in the US

In the US, there are three GP cows on the Top 25 GTPI Cows List (GP-83-or Higher).  Leading the way is BEN-AKERS PLANET LUISE26-ET, she the #3 GTPI cow and the #1 NM cow scored over 83 points.  While Luise is from the Ricecrest Luke Lisa family and has solid type numbers, her genomic values for type are actually lower than her parent average and yet she still has a son at Alta Genetics, Ben-Akers AltaRazzle.  Joining Luise on the top GTPI list at #18 is SURE-VIEW MP PLANET LEXI.  Lexi is from the M&M-Pond-Hill Leadman Luba family and is scored GP-83-2YR.  Similar to Luise, Lexi has high genomic values compared to her parent average but yet again has conformation scores that just meet expectations.  Unlike Luise, it appears to this point that Lexi does not have any sons currently in A.I..  The third member of the list is SULLY PLANET MANITOBA , this GP-83-2YR is out of the great brood cow, Sully Shottle May the former #1 GTPI and GLPI cow of the breed.  Of course May is believed to have more offspring genomic tested over 2200 & 2300 GPTI than any other cow in the breed.  Unlike the other two GP 2yr olds on the top list, Manitoba has outstanding type numbers and her genomic values are actually higher than her parent average.  It’s these outstanding values that have her with at least three sons currently in A.I., SULLY HART MERIDIAN-ET and SULLY HART MUNICH-ET at Semex, and SULLY ALTABRANDON-ET at Alta Genetics.

The Canadian Story

Much like the US list the #3 spot on the Canadian List is held by a GP-83-2YR, Benner Planet Jakova-ET.  Being a Planet from a Goldwyn, Jakova has strong parent average for type and has strong genomic values as well.  Coming from the Benner Luke Jean family, Jokava has yet to put a son into A.I.. Joining Jokova on the list is Delaberge Planet Lulu.  However, on April 25th Lulu was raised to VG-85-2YR, 244 days fresh.  Lulu comes from the Bryhill Lindy Lilly family and already has a son at Semex, DONNANDALE LUMI.  The third member on the list is Alexerin Oman 993. Of interesting note about 993 is that there are no VG dams anywhere in her pedigree, she has mostly production sires and yet her parent average for conformation is five and her genomic value is a six.  Not surprisingly, 993 does not have any sons currently in A.I.  The last member on the list is Calbrett Planet Empress.  Much like Lulu, Empress has since been moved to VG-86-2YR later in lactation.  Empress is from the WABASH-WAY EVETT dam of the popular genomic sire Genervations Eclipse and the same family as Epic and Highway.  Given the strong maternal pedigree, Empress has PA of +10 for conformation and actually exceeds that with a +12 for her direct genomic value.  Given her increase in score and strong maternal pedigree it is just a matter of time before she has sons in A.I..

The Bullvine Bottom Line

While GP-84-2YR use to be the kiss of death for many marketing and genetic programs, genomics has changed the game.  With genomics, we are seeing many GP 83 or 84 cattle used as dams that would have never been touched before.  While many will increase in score later in life, many do not, and yet that does not seem to be as big a factor.  Many A.I. companies and breeders are more concerned about their genomic values than that of their actual classification score.

 

Not sure how much to spend on that great 2 year old?
Want to make sure you are investing your money wisely?
Download our Dairy Cow Investment Calculator.

 

TOM BYERS: “THAT’S CLASSIFIED!”

Monday, March 26th, 2012

Tom Byers, who is in charge of classification for Holstein Canada knows a lot about the differences in cattle. “The show ring cow, with the emphasis on red carpet style is more the extreme. This is exactly what she should be. When you see her at the Royal in that ring every Holstein breeder in Canada wants to own her whether he thinks he’s commercial or not . Good breeders know that. They appreciate a good cow, show ring or barn.” Having said that, Tom points out that the Canadian classification system does not reward extremes.  He goes on to point out where they are similar. “There are two things that make the show cow and the cow in barn the same, when it comes to being judged or classified. Those two things are the two most important traits - udders and feet and legs.”

Tom Byers - Ferme GilletteUDDERLY EXCELLENT

Byers has classified many amazing cows but, when it comes to udders, he tells about one cow that got him excited. “It was at Ferme Gillette and it was the old Smurf cow who is the new World Champion for Lifetime production. We were walking past her stall when I asked Louis, ‘What is that cow classified?’ He gave her a pat on the rump and she immediately got up. Faster than some two year olds I might add. When I saw that udder and felt the texture I could have stretched it from Ferme Gillette to the Parliament Buildings in Ottawa and it would have sprung right back. Looking at her spring of fore and rear rib, I knew I had to make her EX.” Classification doesn’t reward extremes but Byers can sure describe them!

ARE YOU CLASSIFICATION READY?

Tom doesn’t really think it is necessary to have cows ready for the previously mentioned red carpet when the classifier comes. “The simple answer is ‘No!’ it’s not necessary.  But I do think it makes a difference to the Holstein member. A self satisfaction if you will. Classifiers always appreciate good housekeeping.” Having said that, he goes on, “If you mean getting up in the middle of the night to have their udders full and most times over full to present to the classifier, I would just like to quote an old colleague and mentor of mine, Don Aylsworth “Feed the cow and the udder will fill itself.” Classified information indeed!

Future of Dairy Cattle ClassificationFACING FORWARD WITH CLASSIFICATION

Dedicated to his career and the members he serves, Byers takes his customary positive approach to the future. “I think we will continue to evolve our program to meet the needs of the dairy producer. Classification is without a doubt a very important animal welfare program and by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the individual, we can corrective mate to help the next generation take care of herself in the different environments we ask her to work in. We have always combined science and cow sense as we have made changes.”

 OH CANADA! GENOMICS IS THE NEW BUZZ WORD

Byers feels that “Classification will be the conformation verification of our Genomic selected sires.” He is justifiably proud of the dairy industry, “We must always remember that the world comes to Canada for its cow.  If Genomics can enhance our accuracy of genetic selection that will be a bonus! Our cow in Canada has never been better than she is today.  She is calving from 22 to 25 months of age. For the first time her udder is 5 inches above her hock and she wants to milk 40 plus liters.” That’s “Oh Canada” as sung by classifier Byers.

BULLVINE BOTTOM LINE

Tom Byers feels it has been his privilege to represent Canada domestically and internationally and to build lasting memories with his colleagues and Holstein Breeders.

“IT’S ALL ABOUT TRUST” Tom Byers